From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 01:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010104.n4114P5O004958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Jeff Schroeder changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jeffschroeder at computer.org --- Comment #11 from Jeff Schroeder 2009-04-30 21:04:24 EDT --- Kernel version check patch submitted upstream: http://selenic.com/pipermail/smem/2009-April/000016.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 01:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010157.n411vw9J013939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-30 21:57:56 EDT --- You still really don't need those macros. There is no reason to keep unnecessary cruft in a package, derived from another or not. Also, it is generally good form to bump the release and add an entry to the changelog whenever making a change to the spec file, even during review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 02:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010259.n412x5Dn004239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 22:59:04 EDT --- Ok, then. I'll adjust it later if I ever get a response from upstream. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jVorbisEnc.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.1-3 - License is LGPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 03:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010330.n413Uh0e010120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-04-30 23:30:42 EDT --- Package approved. But keep bugging upstream... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 03:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010338.n413cAdK011410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-04-30 23:38:09 EDT --- Sure, I will. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jVorbisEnc Short Description: Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 04:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 00:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010406.n4146jXs016192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-01 00:06:43 EDT --- Some notes: * About shebang or so related rpmlint warning ------------------------------------------------------------ find %{buildroot}%{geminstdir} -name "*.rb" | xargs chmod a+x for script in \ /lib/case_sensitive_require/RedCloth.rb \ .... .... /extras/ragel_profiler.rb; do chmod +x %{installroot}/$script sed -i -e '1i #!/usr/bin/ruby' %{installroot}/$script done ------------------------------------------------------------ - No, this is not right. If these ruby scripts are not meant to be executed directly from user, these script should not have shebang and should have 0644 permission. Rather the following is correct: ------------------------------------------------------------ find %{buildroot}%{geminstdir}/test -type f -name \*.rb | \ xargs grep -l "^#!%{_bindir}/env" | xargs chmod 0755 ------------------------------------------------------------ * About copying files into ruby_sitelib ------------------------------------------------------------ cp %{installroot}/lib/redcloth.rb %{buildroot}%{ruby_sitelib}/redcloth.rb ------------------------------------------------------------ - What is this line for? * Documents - IMO the following files/directories should be marked as %doc: ------------------------------------------------------------ %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* %{geminstdir}/test/ ------------------------------------------------------------ * About missing files for debuginfo rpm: - I wrote a comment for this on fedora-packaging list. This is not rubygem specific issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 04:19:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 00:19:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010419.n414Jn5t018117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 00:19:48 EDT --- I just copied that out of another spec file i've seen, i figured it was part of the coding standards. I'm assuming that setup.py should do The Right Thing (TM). If it doesn't, getting upstream to fix that shouldn't have to be considered a blocker to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 04:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 00:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010459.n414xUVp014589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 Renich Bon Ciric changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |renich at woralelandia.com --- Comment #13 from Renich Bon Ciric 2009-05-01 00:59:27 EDT --- what has happened with this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 05:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 01:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010508.n41585Nw026536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arthurg.work at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from arthurguru 2009-05-01 01:08:04 EDT --- Hi Silas, please treat this review as advisory as it's my first review of someone elses work against the Fedora Guidelines. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - rpmlint funcshell-0.0.1-1.src.rpm -Ok -rpmlint funcshell-0.0.1-1.noarch.rpm -Not OK - rpm package does not build on my system. Processing files: funcshell-0.0.1-1 error: File not found by glob: /var/tmp/funcshell-0.0.1-1-root-root/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell-0.0.1-*.egg-info - Not OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - Doesn?t build (on my system) - Not OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. -OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - Doesn?t build on my system Must: Python eggs must be built from source. They cannot simply drop an egg from upstream into the proper directory. - No egg-info files generated. Must: If egg-info files are generated by the modules build scripts they must be included in the package. - No egg-info files generated, package is expecting them. - Not OK MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - See above - Not OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - Missing python requirement in spec file: BuildRequires: python - Not OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK, no locales available MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK, no shared library available MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - OK, no relocatable package MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. URL: and Source0: could be more consistent with %{name} macro - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no library files MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK, no devel package MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la files MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, no gui available MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Regards, Arthur Gouros - OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010608.n4168VSP026169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010607.n4167rdF026111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com Bug 492397 depends on bug 492396, which changed state. Bug 492396 Summary: Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 492397 depends on bug 492395, which changed state. Bug 492395 Summary: Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-01 02:07:51 EDT --- Source1: websvn-httpd.conf Patch1: websvn-2.2.0-use_system_libs.patch What is source for patch1? Where do you get websvn-httpd.conf? in spec file you have 2.2.0-1 but srpm is for 2.1.0-3 could you please give a link to 2.2.0 srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] New: Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any Alias: perl-Config-JFDI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-JFDI/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Config-JFDI.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Config::JFDI is an implementation of Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader that exists outside of Catalyst. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331209 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010635.n416Z8x7030928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet 2009-05-01 02:35:06 EDT --- Upstream have push a new configure with hsieh hash method disabled by default. Here a updated RPM using this patch Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/libmemcached.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/libmemcached-0.28-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010644.n416iffG032114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-05-01 02:44:38 EDT --- Yes, I have updated all the bioconductor packages to the latest stable version and update Biostrings as well: SPEC: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Biostrings.spec SRPM: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Biostrings-2.12.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010652.n416qrho011011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 02:52:52 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'data/lxshortcut.ui' '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/lxshortcut/lxshortcut.ui' /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 'data/choose-icon.ui' '/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10.x86_64/usr/share/lxshortcut/choose-icon.ui' - Addind INSTALL="install -p" to make install arguments should fix this. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Fix the time stamp issue before importing to cvs. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 06:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 02:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010658.n416wVBf011891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 02:58:30 EDT --- Taking into review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 07:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 03:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010710.n417AsEX004251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 03:10:53 EDT --- rpmlint output: fedora-devshell.noarch: E: description-line-too-long Fedora Devshell is a developers toolbox for creating packages and developing software for Fedora. It aims to simplify the process of creating and maintaining packages in the Fedora repositories, and simplify the workflow between other Fedora components. fedora-devshell.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/devshell/devshell.py 0644 fedora-devshell.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/devshell/ports.py 0644 fedora-devshell.src: E: description-line-too-long Fedora Devshell is a developers toolbox for creating packages and developing software for Fedora. It aims to simplify the process of creating and maintaining packages in the Fedora repositories, and simplify the workflow between other Fedora components. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. - You need to break the description lines to match the 80 character width restricition. - Either add executable bits to devshell.py and ports.py or remove their shebangs to fix the non-executable-script problem. Python library files should not have shebangs; please contact upstream to remove them. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - License is GPLv2, not GPLv2+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX - No source URL provided. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory.?~OK - Instead of using %{python_sitelib}/* please use %{python_sitelib}/devshell/ %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-*.egg-info instead, as this is more likely to pick up errors. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add PKG-INFO to %doc. MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 07:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 03:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010726.n417QRFC016625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 03:26:26 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - There is nothing mentioned about a license in the tarball => the tarball has no license. - Since the GPLv2+ license is in upstream svn, use a svn revision for now, until upstream releases a stable tarball with a license. (Of course, you can ask upstream to make a new stable release with the license info ASAP.) MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Use "cp -a" instead of plain "cp" in setup phase. - Also, use install -D -p -m 755 smem $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/smem to preserve the time stamp of the python file itself. -D creates the directory if necessary, so you can drop the dir creation line: install -p -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX - Use the svn revision until upstream releases a new tarball with license information included. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 08:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 04:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010822.n418MKDn027114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-01 04:22:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Source1: websvn-httpd.conf > Patch1: websvn-2.2.0-use_system_libs.patch > > What is source for patch1? > Where do you get websvn-httpd.conf? > I wrote both of them. The patch allows to use external php-geshi and php-feedcreator. The source is the conf needed for httpd. > in spec file you have 2.2.0-1 but srpm is for 2.1.0-3 > could you please give a link to 2.2.0 srpm? Sorry, I updated the package but forgot to update the ticket... Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/websvn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/websvn-2.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm 2.2.0 needs a bit of work because an option to move the config file is now provided and the symlink to /etc trick is not needed anymore. I'll fix that asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 09:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010942.n419gJHg008508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #74 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-01 05:42:13 EDT --- I reworked my patch to preserve the name of all the current rpms (src and noarch): Please test: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/publican/publican-0.45-0.4+naming.fc11.noarch.rpm This package should have brew-* and web-* targets continuing to work unchanged as before (only changes to the .spec and tarball names), and provide new make targets fedora-* and koji-* for creating fedora rpms and pushing builds to koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 09:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 05:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905010956.n419uZgf010904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-05-01 05:56:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Alright, here is the review. Nothing serious: Thank you very much for the review! > ! Please make the description span 80 columns evenly (as much as possible) Done. > ! The file Changes can be packaged as %doc Done. > ! There is no information about the license except at the end of the > lib/JSON/RPC/Common.pm file. Could you advise upstream for putting a COPYING > file into the tarball and adding headers that contain license information to > the source files? Yes, I've mailed upstream. The author replied that he'll have a look at this. > ! It looks like these BR's can be removed: > BuildRequires: perl(Moose) > BuildRequires: perl(namespace::clean) > The package builds fine without them. The other packages pull them in so they > don't cause any harm. I'll leave this up to you. Done, I've removed them. > * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. I > don't think this package should own %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ . It should own > %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/RPC instead. Ownership of %{perl_vendorlib}/JSON/ will > be satisfied by rpm's automatic dependency generation. Done. new package: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 10:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 06:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497827] Review Request: shortrpm - Short-circuit binary RPM package build In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011022.n41AM1db015149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497827 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-01 06:21:57 EDT --- *** Bug 478463 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 11:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 07:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011111.n41BBZBf023958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-01 07:11:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fix the time stamp issue before importing to cvs. Will do, thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxshortcut Short Description: Small utility to edit application shortcuts Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 11:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 07:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011133.n41BXTYD016910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 07:33:28 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 12:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 08:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011218.n41CIYr2004138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |466737 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 12:18:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 08:18:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011218.n41CIZd0004171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 12:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 08:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011227.n41CRhxt006007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #10 from Fabien Georget 2009-05-01 08:27:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > Please follow the procedure written on: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join > > from "Get a Fedora Account". > > After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor > > members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies > > that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on > > this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and > > your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. > > I apply to the packager group. > Sorry, I forgot to give my login : It is manawy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 13:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498604] New: Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498604 Summary: Review Request: apron - Abstract numerical domain library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/apron/apron.spec SRPM URL: http://www.openproofs.org/packages/apron/apron-0.9.10_pr-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: APRON is a library of functions that allows the definition and analysis of abstract numerical domains. APRON allows for different types of numerical coefficients, both arbitrary precision floating-point and rational, and different types of domain structures like intervals and polyhedra. It allows for variable assignments and constraints involving domains, and operations on these variables like comparisons, existential quantification, substitution, meet and join. I have done the following with respect to checking the packaging guidelines: rpmlint produces: apron.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libap_pkgrid.a (... many more like this about static libs...) ocaml-apron.i386: W: no-documentation ocaml-apron.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/aprontop ocaml-apron.i386: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/aprontop ocaml-apron.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/ppltop ocaml-apron.i386: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/ppltop ocaml-apron.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/apronppltop ocaml-apron.i386: W: ocaml-mixed-executable /usr/bin/apronppltop 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 49 warnings. The first category of warnings are all about inclusion of libraries in the main package. Ostensibly, the whole purpose of the apron package is these libraries, so I was not sure of whether these belong in -devel. Furthermore, these libraries are all static. Ideally, this would not be the case, and I have mentioned to upstream aspects of their build procedure that complicate packaging, and intend to continue to move them toward better practices for packaging compatibility (eg: shared libraries, using standard "configure, make, make install" process). Packaging already requires an extensive set of changes to their makefiles to allow for configuration at locations as specified by RPM parameters (which was included in the form of a patch). If there are more things I should be doing in the short term for the static libraries (eg: moving them all into -devel, creating a -static or a virtual package -static via "provides") or if this static library creation is a problem for packaging this overall, let me know. The second set of warnings are a standard set of warnings for OCaml bytecode binaries - I will tell upstream to try not to "-custom" for future releases (which goes hand-in-hand with switching to shared libraries). Note that the version name is due to the fact that this is a "pre-release" of version 0.9.10 in the sense that 0.9.10 will soon be released and this was taken from the SVN repository as "most of the way there". (It incorporates the changes that are necessary for me to next package Frama-C.) I also verified that the package builds in koji for dist-(f9 to f12) (eg: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331353). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 13:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011306.n41D60rM013333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 --- Comment #9 from Darryl L. Pierce 2009-05-01 09:05:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Some notes: > > * About shebang or so related rpmlint warning Thanks for the feedback. I'll incorporate them into the first build for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 13:16:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011316.n41DGK3Z004784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |489564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 13:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011316.n41DGLPM004836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 13:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 09:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011333.n41DXTdb019158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-01 09:33:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Sorry, I forgot to give my login : It is manawy. Well, the email used in your account on FAS differs from what is used on this bugzilla, which must coincide. Please change either of them, then I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 14:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011404.n41E4wre014861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 14:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454980] Review Request: axel - Download accelerator, wget replacement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011421.n41ELr40018303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454980 --- Comment #42 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-05-01 10:21:50 EDT --- Ok, I built it: http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora9/axel/axel-2.4-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 14:32:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:32:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011432.n41EW5iC030984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-01 10:32:04 EDT --- Thanks Arthur. Just curious how you ran your build; this is what I did and it worked. 1. [silas at silas SRPM]$ wget http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 2. [silas at silas SRPMS]$ mock -r fedora-10-i386 funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm NFO: mock.py version 0.9.14 starting... State Changed: init plugins State Changed: start INFO: Start(funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(fedora-10-i386) State Changed: lock buildroot State Changed: clean State Changed: init State Changed: lock buildroot Mock Version: 0.9.14 INFO: Mock Version: 0.9.14 INFO: enabled root cache State Changed: unpacking root cache INFO: enabled yum cache State Changed: cleaning yum metadata INFO: enabled ccache State Changed: running yum State Changed: setup State Changed: build INFO: Done(funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) Config(fedora-10-i386) 1 minutes 1 seconds INFO: Results and/or logs in: /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result 3. [silas at silas SRPMS]$ rpmls /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/funcshell-0.0.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/funcshell drwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell-0.0.1-py2.5.egg-info -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/__init__.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/__init__.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/__init__.pyo -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/utils.py -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/utils.pyc -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/funcshell/utils.pyo drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/funcshell-0.0.1 -rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/funcshell-0.0.1/LICENSE 4. [silas at silas SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. P.S. If the syntax of the egg file name is different, let me know the name and I will make the glob more general. Thanks again, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 14:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011442.n41EgZWA022854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 10:42:35 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 14:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011442.n41EgUEB022814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 10:42:29 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 15:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011525.n41FPor0009490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-01 11:25:49 EDT --- Thanks. But now we have the rpmlints: perl-JSON-RPC-Common.src: E: description-line-too-long objects to convert the model objects into JSON text and HTTP requests/responses. perl-JSON-RPC-Common.src:54: W: macro-in-%changelog doc perl-JSON-RPC-Common.src:56: W: macro-in-%changelog perl_vendorlib Please fix these. Also, running rpmlint on the SPEC and SRPM files after you're done editing is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 15:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011536.n41Fa7x3011658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 11:36:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 15:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 11:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011536.n41Fa2f5011528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 11:36:02 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 16:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 12:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011633.n41GXUZG012896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-01 12:33:28 EDT --- Here's a mostly-complete review with a few questions: - naming and licensing are fine - versioning is fine - where does Source3 (the build.xml) come from? what about Patch1 (-jar-up)? - I didn't know you could use the %setup macro more than once but I don't see anything in the guidelines about not doing this - a comment other than "apply patches" would be useful before the %patch macros. I personally like to say what each patch is doing - lines 16, 99, 101, 108, 109, 110 are all > 80 characters - the Makefile(s) they provide do something weird with debuginfo ... or /usr/bin/lpg isn't executable so strip-debuginfo isn't run on it? I have to go over the non-Java packaging guidelines for the C++ stuff. That'll take me a while but I'll get back to you when I'm done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011710.n41HAk4K021048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-01 13:10:44 EDT --- OK, bumped to -2.aw_fc11 with that change made: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/gst-mixer/gst-mixer-2.26.0-2.aw_fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011716.n41HGEWo032676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-01 13:16:12 EDT --- Thanks Remi, patch seems to work. Starting full review. [ x=ok -=dont't apply !=please fix ?=may fix ] MUST [x] rpmlint must be run on every package [x] package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] spec file name must match the base package %{name} [-] package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [x] [BSD] package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license [x] license field in the package spec file must match the actual license [x] includes the text of the license(s) in its own file: include in %doc [x] be written in American English [x] spec file for the package be legible [x] sources used to build the package must match the upstream source md5sum: 3e022f51301a73ddfc3df32de5b748b19fd97c65 : ok [x] compile and build into binary rpms on at least one architecture http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331611 [-] not successfully compile an architecture: use ExcludeArch [x] all build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [-] spec file MUST handle locales properly [x] shared library files not in any default linker paths: ldconfig [-] relocatable package: the packager must state this fact [x] package must own all directories that it creates [x] not any duplicate files in the %files listing [x] permissions on files must be set properly [x] package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] consistently use macros [x] must contain code, or permissable content [-] large docs should go in a -doc subpackage [x] %doc must not affect the runtime of the application [x] header files must be in a -devel package [-] static libraries must be in a -static package [!] containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' -devel package should have this added. [x] library files that end in .so: go in a -devel package [x] devel pkg: require base package using a fully versioned dependency [x] no .la libtool archives [-] gui app include a %{name}.desktop file [x] must not own files or directories already owned by other packages [x] %install includes rm -rf %{buildroot} [x] filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 SHOULD [x] test that the package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331611 [x] compile and build into binary rpms on all archs http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331611 [+] package functions as described [x] those scriptlets are sane [x] subpackages require the base packag fully versioned dep [x] pkgconfig(.pc) in devel [x] no explicit file dep outside /etc, /bin/, /sbin, /usr/{sbin,bin} Add req on pkgconfig in -devel on importing and you are done. libmemcached is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:19:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:19:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] New: Review Request: uget - A download manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uget - A download manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Summary: Review Request: uget - A download manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/uget/uget.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/uget/uget-1.4.7-1.fc.src.rpm Description: A download manager using GTK+ and libcurl. Koji scratch build: for dist-f11-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331576 for dist-f10-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331581 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011734.n41HYq7E004503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-01 13:34:51 EDT --- 1] rpmlint is not silent on actual package 2] do you really need patch for replacing 3 lines? sed with comment in %prep will be imho better readable. 3] I think that it would be good to add webserver into requires. Because websnv wouldn't work without webserver. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011756.n41HuDHi009208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet 2009-05-01 13:56:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review and the head up on license. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmemcached Short Description: Client library and command line tools for memcached server Owners: remi Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 17:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 13:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011759.n41HxrC1009941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 13:59:52 EDT --- Thanks for taking up the review Jussi. Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-devshell.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/fedora-devshell-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm This release fixes all the above comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 18:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011828.n41ISRb1015608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #12 from Fabien Georget 2009-05-01 14:28:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Sorry, I forgot to give my login : It is manawy. > > Well, the email used in your account on FAS differs from > what is used on this bugzilla, which must coincide. > Please change either of them, then I will sponsor you. Sorry, I didn't pay attention to that point. (too many e-mails !) So : Account name : manawy Email : fabien.georget*at*gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 18:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011843.n41IhSR7018592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-01 14:43:27 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 19:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011937.n41JbgVd030911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-05-01 15:37:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please fix these. Also, running rpmlint on the SPEC and SRPM files after you're > done editing is a good idea. Sure, your're right. Here are the new packages: Spec URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common.spec SRPM URL: http://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 19:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011939.n41JduYu020854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-01 15:39:54 EDT --- So it does. The package has been APPROVED. PS. You might still want to remove the hash comment about noarch packages that have been left over from the spec file template. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 19:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011950.n41Jo9cV001167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-01 15:50:08 EDT --- Great. Thanks! ------------------------------------------------------- This package (perl-JSON-RPC-Common) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 19:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 15:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905011958.n41JwfQQ025448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Christian Krause 2009-05-01 15:58:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JSON-RPC-Common Short Description: Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects Owners: chkr Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012007.n41K7Gpi027540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Mike McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmcgrath at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012006.n41K6OLe027392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Mike McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012007.n41K72ZW027499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Mike McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mmcgrath at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmcgrath at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012014.n41KEJi4028787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Mike McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mike McGrath 2009-05-01 16:14:18 EDT --- rpmlint: pam_yubico.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1-1 ['2.1-1fc9', '2.1-1fc9'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. name matches approved license, matches what is in README Very simple package, all things look good. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:24:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:24:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012024.n41KOEOb031920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Mike McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mike McGrath 2009-05-01 16:24:13 EDT --- rpmlint looks ok: ykclient.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.2-1 ['2.2-1fc9', '2.2-1fc9'] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. The license isn't explicitly listed as BSD but the text is BSD clause two and valid. Name matches, package builds and I can auth against the yubico server. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012033.n41KXWSn003809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:33:31 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012044.n41Ki9uA014400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:44:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ykclient Short Description: Yubikey management library and client Owners: ausil Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: CVS Done thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012046.n41Kkf6s006826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:46:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pam_yubico Short Description: A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys Owners: ausil Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: CVS Done thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012051.n41KpUeK008098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:51:29 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012050.n41Ko6Wf007714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:50:05 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012052.n41Kq6Yu008175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:52:05 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012049.n41KnH82007295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:49:16 EDT --- CVS Done I took the liberty to add a F-11 branch also -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012055.n41Ktsjv009385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012053.n41KrfqG008673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:53:40 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012052.n41Kqp2F008575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:52:50 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:55:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012055.n41KttVP009406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Bug 476530 depends on bug 472819, which changed state. Bug 472819 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497640] Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012055.n41KtDIs017412@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 Darryl L. Pierce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012056.n41KudtF017729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:56:38 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012055.n41KtF7q017455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:55:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012055.n41Ktvcq017540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:55:56 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012054.n41KsjGk017021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:54:44 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012058.n41Kwlhm018068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:58:46 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:58:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:58:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012058.n41Kw6TA017930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:58:04 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476530] Review Request: projxp - Agile project management server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012055.n41KtEll017433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476530 Bug 476530 depends on bug 497640, which changed state. Bug 497640 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-RedCloth - Textile parser for Ruby. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497640 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NOTABUG Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012102.n41L274k010791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:02:06 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498186] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012059.n41KxZ2p010006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:59:34 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012100.n41L0n9R010596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:00:48 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012057.n41KvPSk009647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 16:57:24 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 20:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 16:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012058.n41KwMBq009844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #54 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-01 16:58:20 EDT --- Building mumble on ppc64 fails. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331819 Reason: ice-devel witch is required by mumble is not available for ppc64 arch. Should I fill this as a bug report or? NEW SPEC: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75:81/tj/etmain/mumble/mumble-1.1.8-7.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012101.n41L1LF9019022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:01:20 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:02:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:02:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012102.n41L2hJi019345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:02:42 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:00:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012100.n41L0ET0018719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:00:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012103.n41L3ES2011087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012103.n41L3nDG011179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-05-01 17:03:48 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012114.n41LEbtg021656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #14 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-01 17:14:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > > works fine in its basic usage without it. > > and fails gracefully if its not installed. Not to mention the ridiculous > depchain difference between only python and python-matplotlib. Would be nice if upstream could separate gui stuff in a module such that we could ship smem and smem-gui, with smem-gui having a dep on python-matplotlib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012121.n41LLFrU014752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:21:12 EDT --- zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012122.n41LMGh4023438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:22:15 EDT --- zfstream-20041202-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zfstream-20041202-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012154.n41Ls8W0028960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:54:07 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:54:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:54:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012154.n41LsHfJ028998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 17:54:17 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012157.n41Lvbf5029711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012158.n41LwG8S021121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 21:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 17:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012159.n41LxUbc021202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012245.n41MjrIa000482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:45:52 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:43:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:43:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012243.n41MhvtH032393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:43:56 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012244.n41MivxF032473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:44:56 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012245.n41MjfT0005134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 18:45:40 EDT --- You mean the remark on the first line? I've seen that in other packages as well, so i'm not really gonna bother. Thanks again for the speedy review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:48:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:48:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012248.n41MmE3e005384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-01 18:48:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: fedora-devshell Short Description: Fedora Developer's Toolbox Owners: ynemoy Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012258.n41MwlJB006875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:58:46 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012259.n41Mx0ob006949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498688 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 23:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012300.n41N0MBE007462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:00:22 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 22:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 18:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012259.n41MxWPt007084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 18:59:32 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 23:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012307.n41N7lLP008537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:07:46 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.15-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 23:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012307.n41N7qKS008572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:07:51 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 1 23:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905012307.n41N7ucU003697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-01 19:07:56 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/powwow-1.2.15-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 03:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497686] Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020351.n423puIl014243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-01 23:51:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 03:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020350.n423ocoZ018600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2009-05-01 23:50:35 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8.1-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1332306 1332306 build (dist-f10, mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm): open (x86-6.fedora.phx.redhat.com) -> closed 0 free 0 open 5 done 0 failed 1332306 build (dist-f10, mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm) completed successfully RPMLint: rpmlint mathgl.spec ../SRPMS/mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/mathgl-1.8.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm mathgl.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libmgl-glut.so.5.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. With regards to the error, quoting from http://www.opengl.org/resources/libraries/glut/spec3/node90.html "GLUT has no special routine for exiting the program. GLUT programs should use ANSI C's exit routine. If a program needs to perform special operations before quitting the program, use the ANSI C onexit routine to register exit callbacks. GLUT will exit the program unilaterally when fatal errors occur or when the window system requests the program to terminate. For this reason, avoid calling any GLUT routines within an exit callback." Thus this is entirely a glut limitation, and I don't think that we should drop GLUT support for this reason. GLUT is a convenient first foray into OpenGL programming. Changelog: * Fri May 02 2009 1.8.1-1 - Update to 1.8.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 03:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 23:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497869] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020355.n423tMSh019227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-01 23:55:21 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020406.n4246ujN016435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:06:55 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020403.n4243MKm015714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:03:21 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020403.n4243w8M015765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:03:57 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020406.n4246kfs016396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-05-02 00:06:45 EDT --- SPEC URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.spec SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm Koji : No, pending mathgl. RPMLint output: $ rpmlint udav.spec ../SRPMS/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Changelog: * Sat May 02 2009 0.5.1-1 - Update to 0.5.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020407.n4247Vpc020953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 00:07:30 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ykclient-2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020412.n424CDMS017325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 --- Comment #8 from D Haley 2009-05-02 00:12:12 EDT --- SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm Should beL SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/udav-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424LkmM018885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439630] Review Request: jogl - Java bindings for OpenGL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424Lod6019000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439630 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431251] Review Request: rep-gtk - GTK+ binding for librep Lisp environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424LlGa018917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431251 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431249] Review Request: sawfish - An extensible window manager for the X Window System. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424Ljaq018846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431249 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424LmrR018955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456242] Review Request: gavl - A library for handling uncompressed audio and video data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424LqIw019058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456242 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454888] Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424LpSP019030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454888 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456256] Review Request: frei0r-plugins - Frei0r - a minimalistic plugin API for video effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424LrID019090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456256 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020421.n424Li2e018792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |456242, 456256, 454888, | |439627, 439630, | |431250(librep), | |431251(rep-gtk), | |431249(sawfish) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jxcF022862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 383271] Review Request: b43-firmware - V4 firmware for Broadcom wireless devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jpdU022617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=383271 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jvxK022786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jqCT022646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464781] Review Request: flexdock - Java docking UI element. First package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jtbX022758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464781 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player (This is my first package-sponsor needed!) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020446.n424k0H3022883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468797] Review Request: jrosetta - A common base to build a graphical console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jwlO022821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468797 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424js3d022702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jnsu022576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |464781, 467363, | |459979(mlt), 468797, | |383271, 443771, 490210, | |484644 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424jAEf026376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |metal3d at gmail.com --- Comment #19 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-02 00:45:06 EDT --- *** Bug 429486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 04:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 00:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429486] Review Request: screenlets - A widget system for Compiz-fusion and Beryl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020445.n424j8aM026327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429486 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE --- Comment #34 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-02 00:45:06 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 484644 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 05:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 01:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020559.n425x0B5000753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|467363 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 05:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 01:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020559.n425x6BU000846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|459979(mlt) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 05:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 01:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467363] Review Request: mlt++ - C++ wrapper for the MLT library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020558.n425wxdX000684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467363 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|496433(RussianFedora) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 05:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 01:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459979] Review Request: mlt - Toolkit for broadcasters, video editors, media players, transcoders In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020559.n425x5Kt000809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459979 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|496433(RussianFedora) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020601.n4261F8f004902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Fabien Georget changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Fabien Georget 2009-05-02 02:01:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xcowsay Short Description: xcowsay displays a cute cow and message on your desktop Owners: manawy Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:40:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:40:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020640.n426eJVp007126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 02:40:18 EDT --- libmemcached-0.28-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.28-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020641.n426fQh0010585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 02:41:26 EDT --- libmemcached-0.28-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.28-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020648.n426m5Cw011396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #2 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-02 02:48:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - What's this for? > > %if %{fedora} < 11 > %exclude %{_bindir}/psize.pyc > %exclude %{_bindir}/psize.pyo > %endif > A dumb way to prevent byte compiling .py scripts that reside in /usr/bin on F10 but not on -devel: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=182498 When I have a chance to build the srpm on my devel machine, i can take this part out. > - Instead of > pushd bin > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' CPPROG="cp -p" > popd > and so onyou can just use > make -C bin install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' CPPROG="cp > -p" > make -C src/aaa_lib install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p' > CPPROG="cp -p" > ah, thanks. > > - Why do you generate autoconf files, aren't they distributed in the tarball..? Only because I patch the configure.ac and makefile.am files, so the autoconf stuff needs to be regenerated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472819] Review Request: rubygem-rufus-scheduler - Scheduler for Ruby (at, cron and every jobs) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020656.n426ukEB012663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472819 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 07:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 03:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020701.n4271Wnl009969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |484485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 07:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 03:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020700.n4270bjG009888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-02 03:00:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > You mean the remark on the first line? I've seen that in other packages as > well, so i'm not really gonna bother. Yeah, and in the files section. It's not really a problem, it's just not necessary to have it :) > Thanks again for the speedy review. No problem. You can return the favor by reviewing other packages in the queue, there are lots of them waiting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494862] Review Request: podofo - Tools and libraries to work with the PDF file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020658.n426wDaw009326@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494862 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-02 02:58:11 EDT --- imported and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 07:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 03:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020701.n4271V66009949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498703(perl-Term-Completion | |) Bug 484485 depends on bug 497686, which changed state. Bug 497686 Summary: Review Request: perl-Archive-RPM - Work with an RPM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497686 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 484485 depends on bug 497869, which changed state. Bug 497869 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-Role-XMLRPC-Client - Provide the needed bits to be a XML-RPC client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497869 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 06:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 02:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions Alias: perl-Term-Completion https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-Completion OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Term-Completion.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Term-Completion-0.91-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Term::Completion is an extensible, highly configurable replacement for the venerable Term::Complete package. It is object-oriented and thus allows subclassing. Two derived classes are Term::Completion::Multi and Term::Completion::Path. A prompt is printed and the user may enter one line of input, submitting the answer by pressing the ENTER key. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1332443 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 07:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 03:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020724.n427Oug6012932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-02 03:24:56 EDT --- rpmlint output: apbs.src:53: W: setup-not-quiet apbs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - Use "%setup -q" to fix the first warning. - Your patches are incorrectly named, add a abps- prefix to them. Send the patches upstream. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - You are mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, which is not allowed. - Please add comments about why the patches are necessary. - You can shorten the install section with the hints given above. - Use the same description as in the review request. The one you have now in the SPEC is a bit too long and contains unnecessary information (the last two paragraphs). MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - Stuff under contrib/ seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+, but nothing seems to be packaged from there. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Drop INSTALL and NEWS from %doc, include README. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 07:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 03:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020725.n427PFQc016575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 09:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 05:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020943.n429hgbs001550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 05:43:41 EDT --- > * Please update to the latest version (3.0.4) It is too new to take up and not much changes ... as this package is dependency for whole Mayavi stack which is very big... I would only take it .. after it goes some thorough testing. The one I am using is tested with other packages. > * %{version} should be dropped from URL. Done > * Please make the description span 80 columns. It was already under 80 columns. Still I have adjusted a bit. >* For macro consistency you should either convert X to %{__X}, where >X=(sed,mv,rm), or convert %{__python} to python Done. > * Please preserve the timestamps of the .txt files. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#file-not-utf8 to convert files not in utf8 to utf8 .. I am using above method. Due you have a better way to save timestamp here? I don't know .. whether it is worth for these files. Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsGUI.spec Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 09:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 05:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020948.n429ma0H004870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-02 05:48:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: extras-soci Short Description: The database access library for C++ programmers Owners: denisarnaud Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: denisarnaud -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 09:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 05:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020959.n429x83N006477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 10:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 06:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021002.n42A26BS004579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-02 06:02:05 EDT --- Fortunately, there's no real assembler involved - just including object code as data inside another binary. Trivial to rewrite using "as" rather than nasm and have it work (or at least build - I've no idea how to test it) everywhere. Example: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1332503 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 09:59:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 05:59:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905020959.n429xa7l006556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 10:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 06:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021024.n42AOVDi010280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #24 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-02 06:24:31 EDT --- Uh, extras-soci? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 11:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021106.n42B6lnO014389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-02 07:06:45 EDT --- REVIEW for 9b3acf561848fe69cc8c1896160f5cfe uget-1.4.7-1.fc.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/uget-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: LGPLv2.1 OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. FAIL - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc, but it is GPLv3 instead of LGPLv2.1 OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 e2bb31a1e1064db59ce7f341b9d7b013 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates (None). OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. The %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Others items: OK - Review and package are no duplicates OK - Latest version packaged OK - Properly obsoletes urlgfe OK - Timestamp of Source0 matches OK - Timestamps are preserved during install OK - optflags are honored Issues: Wrong license text included in source Suggestions: - Enhance Summary and %description. Summary: Remove the leading "A " from summary but make it a little more elaborate: "Download manager using GTK+ and libcurl". %description: "Uget is a download manager that allows you to import downloads from HTML files and classify them by categories. Every category has an independent configuration that can be inherited by each download in that category. Uget is the successor of urlgfe, which was called URLget before." - Desktop file is very sparse. Suggestion: [Desktop Entry] Name=Uget Download Manager Comment=Download files from the internet Comment[de]=Dateien aus dem Internet herunterladen GenericName=Download Manager Exec=uget-gtk Icon=document-save Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=GTK;Network;FileTransfer; I used document-save.png for the icon, but you could also use urlgfe-icon.png from the urlgfe package. These are just suggestions you should take into account but no blockers. The only problem is the license. If you are sure that LGPLv2+ is really sure, you can import the package, but in case of doubt ask upstream first. Ether way, upstream should be notified of this issue. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 11:11:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:11:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021111.n42BBjqe015303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 11:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021108.n42B8Fp7014636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #79 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-02 07:08:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #78) > Please check : > > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-5.fc10.src.rpm I did - simple removal of directory from one sub-package isn't acceptable. I propose you to create another one sub-package - firebird-filesystem, which will contain all (or almost all) firebird directories and nothing else. All other sub-packages should require this one. Here is a list of all owned directories, listed in spec. $ grep ^%dir firebird.spec | sed s/" %attr(.*)"//g|sort %dir %{fbroot} %dir %{fbroot}/bin-classic %dir %{fbroot}/bin-superserver %dir %{fbroot}/include %dir %{fbroot}/intl %dir %{fbroot}/lib %dir %{fbroot}/UDF-classic %dir %{fbroot}/UDF-superserver %dir %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name} %dir %{_localstatedir}/lib/%{name}/data %dir %{_localstatedir}/log/%{name} %dir %{_sysconfdir}/%{name} %dir %{_var}/run/%{name} $ However we should not set all directories ownership to this sub-package. I think that we may limit directory ownership of filesystem-subpackage by %{fbroot} (since every sub-package depends on it) and %{fbroot}/lib (since it doesn't harm anyone). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 11:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021112.n42BCUwb015431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 11:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 07:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021124.n42BOaH1017168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-02 07:24:35 EDT --- Still here. Sorry for the delay. I'm afraid we cannot simply ignore explicit dependencies, needed for part of the package's functionality and safely move them all into subpackage. I think, that we may move to subpackage only vtk-python and PyQt4. And I advice you to rename supplementary subpackage to gui subpackage. These dependencies should be moved to main package: Requires: PyQuante Requires: python-biopython Requires: python-openbabel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 12:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 08:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021248.n42CmQur000386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #15 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-02 08:48:25 EDT --- Wow! That's some great news. Thanks for your work! So how would you suggest to continue? Do you want to import the package? Or should I import it and set you as co-maintainer? Or do you wish to not be involved with the package at all? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 12:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 08:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021252.n42CqVaS031159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021314.n42DEDgI002190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #25 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-02 09:14:12 EDT --- Sorry! The new package request if for SOCI (pristine version 3.0.0), not extras-soci! The last modifications you suggested are on their way (a few checks, and I shall upload it on fedorapeople.org). ------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: soci Short Description: The database access library for C++ programmers Owners: denisarnaud Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 EL-5 InitialCC: denisarnaud ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021318.n42DIYjB005291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #80 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-02 09:18:33 EDT --- > However we should not set all directories ownership to this sub-package. I > think that we may limit directory ownership of filesystem-subpackage by > %{fbroot} (since every sub-package depends on it) and %{fbroot}/lib (since it > doesn't harm anyone). I don't understand what you wanted to solve doing that In fact %{fbroot}/lib is need for server-common, libfbembed and libfbclient but ok, let see if you agree with this : %package filesystem Summary: Filesystem for Firebird SQL RDBMS Group: Applications/Databases %description filesystem This is the Firebird SQL Database root file system. %files filesystem %dir %attr(0755,%{name},%{name}) %{fbroot} %dir %{fbroot}/lib and add Requires: %{name}-filesystem to server-common, libfbembed and libfbclient would it be ok ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021321.n42DLj4Q003553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #336173|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #337120|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #81 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-02 09:21:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342172) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342172) spec with filesystem-subpackage for checking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:30:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:30:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] New: Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 Summary: Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jbowes at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg-0.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: gitg is a GitX clone for GNOME/gtk+. It aims at being a small, fast and convenient tool to visualize git history and actions that benefit from a graphical presentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021332.n42DWCJ6007540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 09:32:11 EDT --- I solved this a bit and got stuck in here (reported upstream and waiting for response): https://mail.enthought.com/pipermail/enthought-dev/2009-May/021335.html Sorry for late response. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021348.n42DmklL007610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 09:48:45 EDT --- New dependencies are python-configobj and python-AppTools (under review) python-AppTools - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 URL for download http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-AppTools-3.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm This package has three dependencies: 1. python-EnthoughtBase - (also undergoing review) - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 URL for download http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm 2. python-TraitsGUI also under review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 URL for download http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm which has one dependency python-TraitsBackendQt via yum 3. python-Traits via yum Now tests run for me. But yeah .. they are supposed to be run as sudo or root. Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-EnvisageCore.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 13:54:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 09:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021354.n42DsOhQ010817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 09:54:23 EDT --- https://mail.enthought.com/pipermail/enthought-dev/2009-May/021337.html Reported this one also upstream and waiting for reason for its failure. it looks like no demo and examples are working correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021403.n42E3xIV012504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 10:03:58 EDT --- https://mail.enthought.com/pipermail/enthought-dev/2009-May/021338.html Confirmed that these demo's and examples are not correctly written. We can ignore this demo run. These demo's and examples have dependencies with other packages .. even though package does not have those dependencies in actual. So, we can ignore them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021404.n42E4qUO010250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 10:04:51 EDT --- php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021407.n42E7GDF010995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |giallu at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-05-02 10:07:15 EDT --- If the provided config files works with httpd I think it's better to require it rather than a generic web server. On the other hand, those _not_ wanting to use httpd as web server will be disappointed... A possible solution to this (used in the mantis package) is to split the config file in a subpackage and let that require httpd. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:04:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:04:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021404.n42E4l4p012612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 10:04:47 EDT --- php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021410.n42EA0A8011364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 10:09:59 EDT --- https://mail.enthought.com/pipermail/enthought-dev/2009-May/021340.html You may ignore this test also. I had a chat with one of developers and he confirmed .. currents tests and examples need some love. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021436.n42EaE6B016009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-02 10:36:13 EDT --- Updated to 3.0.4 http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsGUI.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021434.n42EYsKE015456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-02 10:34:53 EDT --- Thank you for review! (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > Wrong license text included in source - I will ping to upstream. > Suggestions: > - Enhance Summary and %description. > - Desktop file is very sparse. - Thank you for suggestions. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: uget Short Description: Download manager using GTK+ and libcurl Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 14:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 10:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] New: Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? Webdavv is a part of eZ Components : https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/php-channel-ezc This component allows you to set up and run your own WebDAV (RFC 2518) server, to enable online content editing for the users of your system through the WebDAV HTTP extension. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Webdav.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ez_components/php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rpmlint: builder at enterprise ~> rpmlint rpmbuild/**/php-ezc-Webdav * 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Pear CompatInfo: +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | Files | Version | C | Extensions | Constants/Tokens | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ | ./* | 5.1.1 | 0 | date | DATE_ISO8601 | | | | | hash | DATE_RFC1123 | | | | | libxml | __CLASS__ | | | | | mime_magic | abstract | | | | | pcre | catch | | | | | | clone | | | | | | final | | | | | | implements | | | | | | instanceof | | | | | | interface | | | | | | private | | | | | | protected | | | | | | public | | | | | | throw | | | | | | try | +-----------------------------+---------+---+------------+--------------------+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021518.n42FIab4024345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498723 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021518.n42FIaNo024325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498721 Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] New: Review Request: eZ Publish Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eZ Publish https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Summary: Review Request: eZ Publish Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora eZ Publish is an Open Source Content Management System chosen by thousands of enterprises and organizations world wide. It helps you build corporate websites, intranets, webshops and media portals. eZ Publish is 100% Open Source, available either as a free download or as an enterprise solution ?eZ Publish Premium? with support, guarantees and maintenance. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish-4.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021523.n42FNcFH023048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498725 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498725] New: Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498725 Summary: Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: llaumgui at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 498723 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? eZ Online Editor 5.0 is the replacement for Online Editor 4.x that uses another editor, specifically tinyMCE, witch makes it work on IE7 Vista, support full screen editing, re sizable edit area and a lot more out of the box. SPEC: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish.spec SRPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish-4.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish-ezoe-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021529.n42FT94Q025992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498725 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498725] Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021528.n42FSdIi025914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498725 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|498723 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498725] Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021529.n42FT8bT025972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498725 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498723 Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498725] Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021528.n42FSMtO025863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498725 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-05-02 11:28:21 EDT --- Oups, same SRPM = same review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021528.n42FScrE025894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|498725 | --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-05-02 11:28:37 EDT --- With the same SPEC/SRPM : RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish-ezoe-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm RPM: http://llaumgui.fedorapeople.org/review/ezpublish/ezpublish-ezodf-4.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021529.n42FTXGI026112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|498725 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498725] Review Request: ezpublish-ezoe - ezoe extension for eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021529.n42FTW4w026090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498725 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|498723 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:45:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:45:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021545.n42FjLr5026519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 11:45:20 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfoview-1.4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021545.n42FjGev026482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 11:45:15 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfoview-1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 15:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 11:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021545.n42FjBWq028660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 11:45:10 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfoview-1.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:23:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:23:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021623.n42GNLwP001781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:23:19 EDT --- vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021623.n42GN5Ua001653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:23:03 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021623.n42GN98a001696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021623.n42GNGa5001734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:23:15 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Mail'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4089 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021625.n42GPTkI032615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:25:27 EDT --- perl-Devel-FastProf-0.08-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021626.n42GQc4B000405@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:26:36 EDT --- perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021625.n42GPMqX032558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021626.n42GQV81000364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.31-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021623.n42GNQ2M031932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.12-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021625.n42GPHx4002536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:25:16 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021626.n42GQNSa002915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:26:22 EDT --- cppcheck-1.31-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021627.n42GREDv003117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:27:13 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:25:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:25:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495440] Review Request: perl-Devel-FastProf - Fast perl per-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021625.n42GPXrB002599@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495440 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.08-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021627.n42GRjfr003262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:27:44 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GT0oB003494@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:28:59 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021628.n42GSen0003387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.006.2-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021627.n42GRJf2003157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.17-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021627.n42GRov0003298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.04-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021626.n42GQgtI002974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.00-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021627.n42GRc2s003225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:27:37 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-SystemInformation'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4104 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTMq8001026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:29:21 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021630.n42GU5NL001558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:30:05 EDT --- abby-0.2.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021628.n42GSMme000823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:28:20 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021628.n42GSabg000897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:28:35 EDT --- perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTt5E001185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:29:54 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021631.n42GVIUg001922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-2.fc9 |0.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTjIi001138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:29:43 EDT --- mingw32-gtkmm24-2.14.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021628.n42GSQ5X000862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTQeo001072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.0-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTx2f001228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GT51D000965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021630.n42GUsDC001867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:30:53 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-PersistentObject'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4125 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021627.n42GRXKq000696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:27:31 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update powwow'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4103 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021628.n42GSASm000760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:28:09 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pam_yubico'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4109 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021631.n42GVXch004725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:31:29 EDT --- parrot-1.0.0-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021632.n42GWq6t005109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:32:51 EDT --- parrot-1.0.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021633.n42GXv4Y005338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:33:56 EDT --- tucan-0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021630.n42GUAo5004321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.0-2.fc9 |0.2.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021632.n42GWagL005018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-3.fc9 |0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:31:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021631.n42GVDaT004632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:31:12 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021631.n42GVcAa004796@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-6.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021633.n42GXMU7005274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20041202-5.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492130] Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTnUe003972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.14.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021634.n42GY7hD005384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:34:06 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ykclient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4149 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021629.n42GTYXF003842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:29:33 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-PersistentObject'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021631.n42GV1xn004491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:31:00 EDT --- libmemcached-0.28-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmemcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4126 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:32:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:32:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021632.n42GWVOK002574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:32:31 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021632.n42GWwCQ002866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-6.fc9 |1.0.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021633.n42GXHw1002905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:33:16 EDT --- zfstream-20041202-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021636.n42Ga5fa003809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:36:04 EDT --- febootstrap-1.7-1.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021634.n42GYdun003109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-1.fc9 |1.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021634.n42GY1qk003005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021635.n42GZ9Jx003472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021637.n42Gb6Ux004065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.11.7-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:35:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:35:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021635.n42GZG5l003597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:35:15 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update powwow'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4157 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021637.n42Gb14T006974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:37:00 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021634.n42GYqP7006035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:34:51 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021636.n42GaFGP006773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:36:14 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021636.n42GaJo7006807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc9 |2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021638.n42Gcd02007287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:38:38 EDT --- perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021637.n42Gbch8007071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:37:37 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021634.n42GYYQj005775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:34:34 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021635.n42GZ56Q006397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:35:04 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:38:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:38:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021638.n42GchhJ007316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.00-1.fc10 |1.00-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021637.n42GbgZp007110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-1.fc9 |0.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021636.n42Ga9RS006718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.7-1.fc10.1 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021634.n42GYuGT006069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42GdMPM007433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:39:21 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Mail'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4189 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021635.n42GZnCU006555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:35:48 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Cache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4160 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42Gd6Ng004894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:39:05 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42GdA7F004930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-2.fc9 |1.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021642.n42GgGp2006053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.7-1.fc10.1 |1.7-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42Gdact004992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:39:35 EDT --- perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021637.n42GbQ1E004158@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:37:24 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021637.n42GbUag004205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20071018-7.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021638.n42GcMgE004355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:38:21 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-SystemInformation'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4181 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42Gd1ct004852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:39:00 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jnettop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4186 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021638.n42Gc5X0004296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:38:04 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Template'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4178 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021643.n42GhEMM009165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:43:13 EDT --- cclive-0.3.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021642.n42GgSgN008971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:42:27 EDT --- geanyvc-0.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021643.n42GhIQf009192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.2-2.fc10 |0.3.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490725] Review Request: geanyvc - Version Controler plugin for geany In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021642.n42GgWwQ009007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490725 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021641.n42GfA6T008564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.006.2-2.fc9 |1.006.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021642.n42GgBZA008904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:42:10 EDT --- febootstrap-1.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42GdQQq007479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:39:26 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jnettop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:41:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:41:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021641.n42Gf6Vp008532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:41:05 EDT --- perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42Gdfnu007873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.11-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021639.n42GdohQ007913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:39:49 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Template'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4195 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021643.n42Gh408009106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:43:03 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Cache'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021642.n42GgdwR006135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 12:42:38 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021642.n42GghA7006169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.17-2.fc9 |0.0.17-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021650.n42GohV3008204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 David Sugar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021648.n42GmKgA007598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #26 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-02 12:48:19 EDT --- I've taken that opportunity to re-deliver a 6th version of the RPM specification file: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-6.fc10.src.rpm [Patch URLs: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gcc43-compatibility.patch (same file as before) and http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/pristine300/soci-3.0.0-fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility.patch (has been updated) ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ The conditional builds are now fine for all the backend types (MySQL, PostGreSQL and Oracle). For Oracle, though, I should add a conditional build switch for every major version (9, 10 and 11), as the Oracle client library has hard-coded that version within its name (e.g., -lnnz11 for version 11). But on Fedora, I guess that that is not an issue (due to license problems): it will occur only for non-free repositories. As there are now less conditional build flags, I'll apply your suggestion (having a single switch by backend type) on the extras-soci package (after having played with it), rather than on the pristine one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] New: Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Summary: Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dyfet at gnutelephony.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnutelephony.org/dist/redhat/ucommon-2.0.5-0.src.rpm Description: uCommon is a lightweight C++ library to facilitate using C++ design patterns even for very deeply embedded applications, such as for systems using uClibc along with POSIX threading support. For this reason, UCommon disables language features that consume memory or introduce runtime overhead. UCommon introduces some design patterns from Objective-C, such as reference counted objects, memory pools, and smart pointers. UCommon introduces some new concepts for handling of thread locking and synchronization. ADDITIONAL NOTE: This is a new package, it is being introduced as part of a set of what will be in total 4 package submissions, that will include libosip2, libeXosip2, and sipwitch which collectively offers a means to construct private and public secure voip telephone networks. As this is my first package, I am also looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 16:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 12:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021651.n42GpxDC011131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-02 12:51:58 EDT --- OK, I checked everything including the license mess (upstream did a good job in classifying things though). There are a few minor issues and questions: ! The md5sum you put in the specfile is wrong. But you don't need to put an md5sum there anyway. * Each package must consistently use macros: %{__python} needs to be converted to python * The new guidelines prefer usage of %global over %define. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture ? Is there a way of generating/packaging the API docs? How about the docs directory? ? How about the examples directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021730.n42HUCw5014269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-02 13:30:11 EDT --- btw, both libeXosip2 and libosip2 are already included into Fedora: [petro at Sulaco ~]$ yum list *osip* Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Available Packages compat-libosip2.ppc 2.2.2-16.fc9 fedora compat-libosip2-devel.ppc 2.2.2-16.fc9 fedora libeXosip2.ppc 3.1.0-1.fc9 fedora libeXosip2-devel.ppc 3.1.0-1.fc9 fedora libosip2.ppc 3.1.0-1.fc9 fedora libosip2-devel.ppc 3.1.0-1.fc9 fedora [petro at Sulaco ~]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021735.n42HZkwp017928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021734.n42HYhFF017507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021740.n42He8vE015887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-02 13:40:07 EDT --- Some random comments after just glancing at your spec file: - First of all please make check that if this is "ucommon" or "commoncpp". Note that commoncpp is already in Fedora. - don't define %version, %release. These macros are defined automatically. - And why do you want to define %uses_stdcpp ? - Now Fedora suggests to use %global instead of %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define - Duplicating package name in Summary is regarded as redundant on Fedora. - Please use license tag valid on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing - BR: gcc-c++ is redundant: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Please don't use "Packager" item. On Fedora this is automatically defined by buildsys. - Please use tarball name directly as main package name and ucommon-devel as development package name. Fedora's naming rule is different from debian. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming - Please write %changelog at last and actually write something on %changelog. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs - %setup should be quiet. Please use "%setup -q". - Please don't use %makeinstall unless avoided: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used - Don't strip binaries. Debug information is needed to create debuginfo rpm: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo - Please check if document files such as "INSTALL" "BUILDS" are needed. I have not read these files (as I am now just watching your spec file) but these files are usually for people who want to compile/install packages by themselves and not needed for people using rpm. - Don't ship static archive or libtool .la files unless needed by some reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries - Package shipping pkgconfig .pc file should have "Requires: pkgconfig": https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Pkgconfig_Files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] New: Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Summary: Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/grfcodec.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/grfcodec-0.9.11-0.1.r2111.fc12.src.rpm Description: A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021749.n42HnZXt020156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |491519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021749.n42HnYX1020116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498744 --- Comment #16 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-02 13:49:32 EDT --- I'll bite the bullet - grfcodec review submitted as bug #498744 - you want to co-maintain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021759.n42HxKrY021703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #7 from Ryan Bair 2009-05-02 13:59:19 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342187) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342187) Fixes build on x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021757.n42HvaE8021535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #3 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 13:57:35 EDT --- 1. ucommon is NOT the same as commoncpp. Both can also co-exist. ucommon is technically a successor package to commoncpp. 2. I use a macro for that because ucommon can be built in a deeply embedded profile without using libstdc++, so if in theory one uses to spec to cross-compile such a target, one can force libstdc++ off. Incidentally, related to this, unfortunately libtool forces libstdc++ into a build even if you neither use nor want it, even if otherwise --nostdc is specified for example. To get around this, some special build magic is done to link in libtool under "C" profile. Is there a better way to do this? 3. I define %version and %release this way because I have a build script to override (autogenerate) values for a rpmbuild through the --define option (also why I have %uses_...). These can be killed of course to normalize the spec file :). Hence my goal was to have a single spec I could use internally as well as externally. But easy enough to redefine by normal conventions :) 4. Remaining items look also easy enough to resolve. How do I submit an updated spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 17:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 13:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021757.n42Hvocw018535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #6 from Ryan Bair 2009-05-02 13:57:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342186) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342186) Fixes RELEASE build configuration and libdir on x86_64 I'll pass these changes on to upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021807.n42I7Gn6020205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Ryan Bair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #342186|0 |1 is obsolete| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] New: Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Summary: Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/rpmdepsize.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/rpmdepsize-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: rpmdepsize is an interactive graphical tool for visualizing the size of RPM dependencies. It's useful for shaming RPMs that have too many dependencies or pull in large amounts of data because of indirect dependencies. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021809.n42I9fqU023499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #8 from Ryan Bair 2009-05-02 14:09:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342189) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342189) Fixes RELEASE build configuration and libdir on x86_64 Removed make.config and make.log from the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021812.n42ICrNx021152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #4 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 14:12:52 EDT --- Yes (exosip/osip)...those are also current enough, too! Then the only other package I will need to submit is sipwitch, keeping track of the issues noted here too :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021817.n42IHnda024885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |llaumgui at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-05-02 14:17:48 EDT --- + rpmlint is ok php-pecl-memcached.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-memcached-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking php-pecl-memcached.src: I: checking 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines + License ok : PHP + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources 646c3ffb622adc0379a3951155f7f4bb memcached-0.1.5.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F10.x86_64 BuildRequires is ok php-devel >= 5.2.0, php-pear libmemcached-devel, zlib-devel + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section + use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + devel package OK + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (F-10 i386 & x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok + Final Requires ok php(zend-abi) = %{php_zend_api} php(api) = %{php_core_api} + Final Provides ok php-pecl(%{pecl_name}) = %{version}-%{release} -------- APPROVED -------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021820.n42IKIdQ025347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-02 14:20:17 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file. - The license is GPLv2+ (see source header, 'either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version.') not GPLv2 - 'Release: 1' should be 'Release: 1%{?dist}' - 'Source0' should point to the upstream location of the source tarball if possible https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - There is 'gcc' mentioned in the 'BuildRequires' this is not needed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Please replace 'BuildArch' with 'ExcludeArch' https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#ExcludeArch_.26_ExclusiveArch - 'Provides: olpc-kbdshim = 4' is not needed https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Other_tags - README is missing in %doc - You must use macros in the %files section https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021820.n42IKWJF025416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-02 14:20:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1. ucommon is NOT the same as commoncpp. Both can also co-exist. ucommon is > technically a successor package to commoncpp. - The reason I am asking you about this is that I see the term "commoncpp" in URL. I guess the upstream URL for this is http://www.gnutelephony.org/index.php/UCommon > 2. I use a macro for that because ucommon can be built in a deeply embedded > profile without using libstdc++, so if in theory one uses to spec to > cross-compile such a target, one can force libstdc++ off. - Well, okay. > 3. I define %version and %release this way because I have a build script to > override (autogenerate) values for a rpmbuild through the --define option (also > why I have %uses_...). - Please don't do this but directly define version, release in Version, Release. > 4. Remaining items look also easy enough to resolve. How do I submit an > updated spec file? - Upload the new spec file and new srpm on somewhere. spec file can be overwritten on the URL you used on the original post, however please make it sure that you change the Release number every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion (so the filename of srpm will change every time you modify your spec file). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021828.n42ISgdT023323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-02 14:28:40 EDT --- Well, in that case I don't think there is much sense in creating a supplementary package [this is a library, not a frontend]. I put everything in the main package. Due to the additional requirements this package is quite big: PyQuante is ~4MB, biopython ~4MB, openbabel is ~3MB and the two latter pull in other stuff also. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/python-cclib-0.91-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021843.n42IharM028795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #7 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 14:43:36 EDT --- Opps...wrong url for sipwitch src rpm: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-0.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021842.n42IgQY7025697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #6 from David Sugar 2009-05-02 14:42:25 EDT --- Yes, we share the same upstream. Actually there was also a request to change the package name to ucommon because of some trademark dispute with someone who (much later, as in mid 2006) created an entirely new package they also called "Common C++" (GNU Common C++ has been in continual use since 1999/2000), and the FSF does not wish to fight the issue. Hence all upstreams will likely migrate to the ucommon name at some point... I have uploaded updates that should cover all initial issues raised: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-1.src.rpm I also put what will be the sipwitch spec I will submit up there to, after covering the issues raised here in that one also in advance: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-1.src.rpm That one is more complicated, as it has swig and plugins... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 18:53:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 14:53:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021853.n42Irirp027298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #82 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-02 14:53:42 EDT --- Finaly I made filesystem-subpackage and move all that was in common into firebird see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333348 http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 19:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021913.n42JDO2s001009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #9 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-02 15:13:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created an attachment (id=342189) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342189) [details] > Fixes RELEASE build configuration and libdir on x86_64 > > Removed make.config and make.log from the patch. Hi Ryan, are you making those changes?, where can I find the modified files?, I was under the impression that I was commiting this packages and I was in charge of make the modifications (also to learn and hopefully at some point don't need a sponsor..) So is summary, you are going to make the necesary changes and I don't have to do anithing else? I'm sure that you are concern about upcomming fedora releases, but I'm also worrie about the current state of the stable fedora release (the 10, remember that one??) I also have semi-prapered other monodevelop packages for fedora that need a reviewer/sponsor, is this the way in witch you are going to deal with my packages? Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 19:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021943.n42Jh25T002655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 --- Comment #5 from Wart 2009-05-02 15:43:01 EDT --- Importing now. Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 19:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 15:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905021947.n42Jl8Xr003329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 Wart changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Wart 2009-05-02 15:47:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: compat-guichan07 Short Description: compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 Owners: wart Branches: F-9 This package is for F-9 only. F10 and later have an updated version already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 21:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 17:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022124.n42LOnvi021628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |polkit-qt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 21:48:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 17:48:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022148.n42LmVp6021727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-02 17:48:30 EDT --- polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 23:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022323.n42NNstQ006566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-02 19:23:53 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 2b5e5173d73f6484b08e5279ba737f5c gausssum-2.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/gausssum-2.1.6-1.fc11.* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. Ok - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 80d0c796f1fc8d2959bb28a8e9f09d58 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. (noarch) OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. FIX - MUST: The package contains a GUI application but does not include a %{name}.desktop file. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: FIX - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. Although I have to admit that I don't have a clue what is really does... :) N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - I think you should include a desktop file. - License text not included. Please poke upstream. - Help -> Documentation does not work, it's liked to file:///usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gausssum/Docs/index.html You should sed/patch this. - File -> Settings -> Gnuplut is set to /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gausssum/gnuplot400/bin/wgnuplot.exe by default. You might want to fix this too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 23:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022327.n42NRKVK003838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-02 19:27:19 EDT --- Please preserver timestamps during cp. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 23:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022328.n42NSE7J007278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from manuel wolfshant 2009-05-02 19:28:13 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, this review has slipped completely below the radar. package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 23:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022334.n42NYh9D004725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #2 from Paul Fox 2009-05-02 19:34:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just some quick comments on your spec file. > thanks! > - The license is GPLv2+ (see source header, 'either version 2 of the License, > or > * (at your option) any later version.') not GPLv2 yup. > - 'Release: 1' should be 'Release: 1%{?dist}' okay. i can't find a reference for %{dist}. when is it set? > - 'Source0' should point to the upstream location of the source tarball if > possible > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL there won't normally be an upstream tarball location. the srpm comes from the same place the tarball would -- i.e., git. so i commented Source0 as in: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control is that okay? > - There is 'gcc' mentioned in the 'BuildRequires' this is not needed > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 okay. > - Please replace 'BuildArch' with 'ExcludeArch' > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#ExcludeArch_.26_ExclusiveArch i suppose. but this package really is intended just for the XO laptop -- it specifically supports the "Grab" keys on the XO keyboard, and handles rotation of the touchpad and local bezel-mounted arrow pad when the XO "rotate" button is used. i didn't see a point in building for non-i386 platforms. should i simply remove the BuildArch line? i confess i won't be much interested in fixing build problems for architectures on which this will never run. > - 'Provides: olpc-kbdshim = 4' is not needed > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#Other_tags okay > - README is missing in %doc yup. > - You must use macros in the %files section > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros oops. rpmlint told me about libdir, but it didn't occur to me to look for the others. what's the next step? after fixing, do i build new rpms for you (or someone else) to look at? or would just a spec file be enough? -paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 2 23:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 19:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905022349.n42NnJmQ006865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-02 19:49:17 EDT --- Hi Guido, thanks for this submission. I guess after the recent discussions about mixers, pluseaudio, alsa etc, it's just the right time for this package. I do have the hardware, so I' going to review this. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 00:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 20:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030049.n430ni8l018575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-02 20:49:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > okay. i can't find a reference for %{dist}. when is it set? in rpmmmacros, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag > there won't normally be an upstream tarball location. the srpm comes from the > same place the tarball would -- i.e., git. so i commented Source0 as in: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control > is that okay? Yes, but add a comment how the tarball was generated. > > > - Please replace 'BuildArch' with 'ExcludeArch' > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures#ExcludeArch_.26_ExclusiveArch > > i suppose. but this package really is intended just for the XO laptop -- it > specifically supports the "Grab" keys on the XO keyboard, and handles rotation > of the touchpad and local bezel-mounted arrow pad when the XO "rotate" button > is used. i didn't see a point in building for non-i386 platforms. should i > simply remove the BuildArch line? i confess i won't be much interested in > fixing build problems for architectures on which this will never run. > what's the next step? after fixing, do i build new rpms for you (or someone > else) to look at? or would just a spec file be enough? We are reviewing rpms, not specs, so please build a new package for me to review. I can also take over sponsorship. And of course I have to test this on my XO first. URL does not work. And worst of all this patching thing wont work. How is one supposed to uninstall it? You need at least make a backup of the file that is restored when the package is uninstalled. Even this is *very* dirty, i never want to see anything like that in Fedora, but maybe we can make an exception for OLPC. Alternatives would be much better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 00:58:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 20:58:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030058.n430wXnO016862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 00:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 20:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030059.n430xDNi016932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 02:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 22:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030256.n432uDKA001607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 02:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 2 May 2009 22:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030256.n432uFiK004409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 04:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 00:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030416.n434GEP5012671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #4 from Paul Fox 2009-05-03 00:16:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > okay. i can't find a reference for %{dist}. when is it set? > > in rpmmmacros, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag > thanks. i seem to have a lot of trouble googling for this kind of thing in the fedora docs. > > > there won't normally be an upstream tarball location. the srpm comes from the > > same place the tarball would -- i.e., git. so i commented Source0 as in: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control > > is that okay? > > Yes, but add a comment how the tarball was generated. oh! sorry. iadded just such a comment, but after i released the version you're reviewing. my mistake. it now says: "the source tarball is created by "make tarball" from within a clone of this git tree: git://dev.laptop.org/users/pgf/olpc-kbdshim" > > what's the next step? after fixing, do i build new rpms for you (or someone > > else) to look at? or would just a spec file be enough? > > We are reviewing rpms, not specs, so please build a new package for me to > review. I can also take over sponsorship. okay. i'll rebuild after cleaning up the next two issues. > And of course I have to test this on > my XO first. > > URL does not work. it doesn't? what result do you get? URL: http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/pgf/olpc-kbdshim/tree/README my understanding is that the URL: should lead to more information describing the package. since this package doesn't have a home page, a link to the README seemed appropriate. not acceptable? > > And worst of all this patching thing wont work. How is one supposed to > uninstall it? You need at least make a backup of the file that is restored when > the package is uninstalled. Even this is *very* dirty, i never want to see > anything like that in Fedora, but maybe we can make an exception for OLPC. > Alternatives would be much better. i expected some issue with that. in defense, the code added by the patch is conditioned on a check for the existence of a script which is installed by my package, and so is benign after olpc-kbdshim is uninstalled. if this is insufficient, i guess i can make a backup, but that feels even uglier to me. paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 04:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 00:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030423.n434NvwF013663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #5 from Paul Fox 2009-05-03 00:23:56 EDT --- > > URL does not work. > > it doesn't? what result do you get? > URL: http://dev.laptop.org/git/users/pgf/olpc-kbdshim/tree/README > my understanding is that the URL: should lead to more information describing > the package. since this package doesn't have a home page, a link to the README > seemed appropriate. not acceptable? argh! i seem to have fixed the URL after releasing as well. sigh. you're right -- it was certainly broken before. i'll rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 04:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 00:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030433.n434XV8Z015026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 00:33:30 EDT --- Ok, I don't see other issues, so this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 04:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 00:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030452.n434q0hD020404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #6 from Paul Fox 2009-05-03 00:51:59 EDT --- new spec file and rpm are here: Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim.spec-5-1 SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim-5-1.src.rpm (the Version changed because this picked up a recent code change.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 05:03:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 01:03:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030503.n4353naE019189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-05-03 01:03:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-memcached Short Description: Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon Owners: remi Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 05:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 01:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030552.n435qgB5029094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 01:52:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-cclib Short Description: A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 06:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 02:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030645.n436jYS5000954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497338 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 06:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 02:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030645.n436jZK1000979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498214 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 06:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 02:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030645.n436jH21003840@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 02:45:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Issues: > - I think you should include a desktop file. > - License text not included. Please poke upstream. > - Help -> Documentation does not work, it's liked to > file:///usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gausssum/Docs/index.html > You should sed/patch this. > - File -> Settings -> Gnuplut is set to > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gausssum/gnuplot400/bin/wgnuplot.exe by > default. > You might want to fix this too. Done. (In reply to comment #2) > Please preserver timestamps during cp. cp -a DOES preserve timestamps. ** I also removed the included cclib, to install you need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum-2.1.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 06:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 02:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030656.n436um0I002721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 02:56:47 EDT --- - Don't ship static libraries. Try adding --disable-static to %configure. If you can't get static libraries not to build, your development package needs to Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}. - The dependency of the devel package on the main package must be fully versioned: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - Instead of having %dir %{_includedir}/ucommon %{_includedir}/ucommon/*.h in the devel file section just put simply %{_includedir}/ucommon/ as this will include the directory and all the files in it. You can also leave out the trailing slash but having it makes the statement a bit clearer. - Do you really need to set %attr(0755,root,root) %{_bindir}/ucommon-config won't a simple %{_bindir}/ucommon-config do? - You have the Group attribute set twice on the main package. - %configure automatically sets CXXFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS", you don't need that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 06:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 02:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030657.n436vmvH002853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030702.n4372tkF006215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 03:02:54 EDT --- - You don't need a vendor tag to build, and if you do it should be empty: --vendor="" according to the policy. - Package does not build in mock, at least dbus-devel is missing. - The build might also fail on schema installation, which you may need to disable: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225253] Merge Review: apr In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030717.n437H0xe005643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225253 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225254] Merge Review: apr-util In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030716.n437G6cp005540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225254 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225299] Merge Review: automake15 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030716.n437GkEH005607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225302] Merge Review: automake In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030717.n437HXd8008346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225302 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:17:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:17:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225301] Merge Review: automake17 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030717.n437HIFT008314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225301 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030715.n437FoQU008144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 03:15:45 EDT --- Ping? It seems the package still does not use %{optflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030718.n437Ix3r005848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225635] Merge Review: cairo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030719.n437JfoS005875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225635 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225304] Merge Review: avahi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030718.n437IOiY005788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225304 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ivazqueznet at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030728.n437S8To007145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 03:28:07 EDT --- bind-dyndb-ldap-0.1.0-0.1.a1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bind-dyndb-ldap-0.1.0-0.1.a1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 07:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 03:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030737.n437b3W0008463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 Martin Nagy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Martin Nagy 2009-05-03 03:37:02 EDT --- The package was built for F-11 and devel. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030814.n438EpeR017536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |llaumgui at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Cache/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This plugin gives you access to a variety of systems for caching data. It allows you to use a very simple configuration API, while maintaining the possibility of flexibility when you need it later. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333666 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030836.n438aFJS022332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030835.n438ZXL9022146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-03 04:35:32 EDT --- Hi Silas, Builds on my system ok, egg file is present. (In reply to comment #3) > MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires > - Missing python requirement in spec file: BuildRequires: python > - Not OK python is required by python-devel in BuildRequires, explicit buildrequires is not needed IMHO (correct me if I'm wrong) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030836.n438aC4g022304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 04:36:11 EDT --- I definitely need to update Data::Visitor, but the warnings here seem to be just annoying rather than material. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1331209 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): ee9d3bac1c341752ac64d4457da4316e60b3a932 Config-JFDI-0.05.tar.gz ee9d3bac1c341752ac64d4457da4316e60b3a932 Config-JFDI-0.05.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Config::JFDI) = 0.05 perl-Config-JFDI = 0.05-1.fc12 ====> requires for perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Carp::Clan) perl(Clone) perl(Config::Any) perl(Data::Visitor::Callback) perl(Hash::Merge::Simple) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Moose) perl(Path::Class) perl(strict) perl(Sub::Install) perl(warnings) =====> perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Config-JFDI-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(Carp::Clan) perl(Clone) perl(Config::Any) perl(Data::Visitor) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Hash::Merge::Simple) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Moose) perl(Path::Class) perl(Sub::Install) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Most) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030842.n438g8cG020373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030842.n438g55G023253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 04:42:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-JFDI Short Description: Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030844.n438iQdp020690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #14 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-03 04:44:24 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030856.n438uFPs022596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 04:56:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qmforge Short Description: Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 08:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 04:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030858.n438wvri022810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Alexander Bostr?m changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |abo at kth.se --- Comment #7 from Alexander Bostr?m 2009-05-03 04:58:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Even this is *very* dirty, i never want to see > anything like that in Fedora, but maybe we can make an exception for OLPC. Don't do it. Just file a bug against the sugar package with the patch in it. Though I have a feeling the patch should also contain code to actually check if it's XO1 hardware, since olpc-rotate could be installed for some other reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030914.n439EqL0025184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:26:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:26:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030926.n439QUN1031083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 05:26:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333703 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030951.n439pm8N031391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 05:51:47 EDT --- Aargh! There's already a nopaste rpm (with /usr/bin/nopaste that conflicts with this one). Will leave this as a single RPM, and rename the installed nopaste script and man page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030954.n439smYa031675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 05:54:47 EDT --- perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030956.n439uoIb032225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030954.n439sq6U002642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 05:54:52 EDT --- perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 09:59:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 05:59:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498397] Review Request: perl-Devel-REPL - Modern perl interactive shell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905030959.n439xCiI003359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498397 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 10:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 06:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031008.n43A8qar001537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-03 06:08:51 EDT --- So far no update from upstream. Here are the updated file: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bournal.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/bournal-1.3-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 10:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 06:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031023.n43ANlgr003799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #83 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 06:23:46 EDT --- Ok, I don't see other serious issues so far. So, please tell me - who will be a primary maintainer of Firebird? You, Philippe, or Jonathan? Since my fedora account was upgraded recently, I can sponsor you, so this is not a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 10:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 06:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: perl Build.PL ./Build ./Build test ./Build install Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333726 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 10:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 06:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] New: Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information Alias: perl-Term-Prompt https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Term-Prompt/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Term-Prompt.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This main function of this module is to accept interactive input. You specify the type of inputs allowed, a prompt, help text and defaults and it will deal with the user interface, (and the user!), by displaying the prompt, showing the default, and checking to be sure that the response is one of the legal choices. Additional 'types' that could be added would be a phone type, a social security type, a generic numeric pattern type... Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333730 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031106.n43B6Jcb013658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #84 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-03 07:06:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #83) > Ok, I don't see other serious issues so far. Thanks, I appreciate your help > So, please tell me - who will be a > primary maintainer of Firebird? You, Philippe, or Jonathan? Since my fedora > account was upgraded recently, I can sponsor you, so this is not a problem. since Jonathan said that I can be the one (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c71), I'll be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:09:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031109.n43B9Gm3013896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-03 07:09:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > cp -a DOES preserve timestamps. Sorry, seems like it was to late yesterday. > I also removed the included cclib, to install you need > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Damn, I missed something really obvious. > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum.spec > http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/gausssum-2.1.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Ok - Requirements look sane, should be covered by cclib. Too bad this package now pulls in PyQt4 and it's deps. OK - Package builds in mock. OK - Package includes a desktop file. OK - Help -> Documentation works OK - File -> Settings -> Gnuplut correct, Test works Issues: You are installing an icon into /usr/share/icons/hicolor/, but you are not running the gtk-update-icon-cache srciptlet. I would simply install to /usr/share/pixmaps, then you don't need to require hicolor-icon-theme. Desktop file: "Analyze output of Quantum Chemistry packages" is a comment, not a GenericName. GenericName would be something like "Quantum computation analyzer" or just GaussSum. Add more categories to allow nested menus: Chemistry (?), DataVisualization and Physics are good candidates I guess, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html IMHO you should just symlink GaussSum.py instead of excluding it's pyc and pyo as you did in the previous package, but this is up to you. Apply fixes and consider this package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031115.n43BFF3X011570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #32 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-03 07:15:11 EDT --- Ping?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031113.n43BDoQ5010997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-03 07:13:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Because of the upcoming release of F11, I suggest not to incorporate this > package until the build issues for F11 and F12 have been resolved. I assume you > agree with me on this. Ok, there are some weired things going on with libtool, your package probably is not the only one that fails here. > I will incorporate the above issues and revert as soon as possible. That will > probably be with a new upstream release to fix the build issues. Ok, feel free when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:14:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461849] Review Request: garmintools - Communication tools for Garmin devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031114.n43BEaxl011088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461849 Bug 461849 depends on bug 468631, which changed state. Bug 468631 Summary: Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-03 07:14:34 EDT --- - libgarmin is now in Fedora. - New upstream version 0.10 Updated files Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/garmintools.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/garmintools-0.10-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031126.n43BQVmv016926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #85 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 07:26:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #84) > (In reply to comment #83) > > Ok, I don't see other serious issues so far. > Thanks, > I appreciate your help > > > So, please tell me - who will be a > > primary maintainer of Firebird? You, Philippe, or Jonathan? Since my fedora > > account was upgraded recently, I can sponsor you, so this is not a problem. > > since Jonathan said that I can be the one > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c71), I'll be Ok, then you should * Open another ticket for firebird review * Mark this one as duplicate of your new ticket. And then I'll approve it. You should start with filling this form: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] New: Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Summary: Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: makowski.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10.src.rpm Description: Firebird is a relational database offering many ANSI SQL standard features that runs on Linux, Windows, and a variety of Unix platforms. Firebird offers excellent concurrency, high performance, and powerful language support for stored procedures and triggers. It has been used in production systems, under a variety of names, since 1981. The Firebird Project is a commercially independent project of C and C++ programmers, technical advisors and supporters developing and enhancing a multi-platform relational database management system based on the source code released by Inprise Corp (now known as Borland Software Corp) on 25 July, 2000. I'm member of the Firebird Admin Team, Q/A tester and I need a sponsor for that rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031141.n43Bf9AQ015592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 07:41:08 EDT --- Will do, thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gausssum Short Description: A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031140.n43BeCYa018997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031143.n43BhDcp015954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #86 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-03 07:43:12 EDT --- ok 498790 created Jonathan, please mark this one (488100) as duplicate of 498790 thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43BusbY018491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43Burwn018437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43Bus8L018462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498790 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43BuqO5018416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495412(flamerobin), | |495949(kinterbasdb), | |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031155.n43Btjo1018233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bioinfornatics at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 07:55:43 EDT --- *** Bug 488100 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031155.n43Btmoi018310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 488100, which changed state. Bug 488100 Summary: Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031155.n43BtkY1018254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Bug 495412 depends on bug 488100, which changed state. Bug 488100 Summary: Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031155.n43BtlOp018278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Bug 495949 depends on bug 488100, which changed state. Bug 488100 Summary: Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031155.n43Btiwc018204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #87 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 07:55:43 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 498790 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43Buh3G021984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|488100(firebird) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43BufQG021929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|488100(firebird) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43BugQ0021955@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|488100(firebird) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031156.n43Buf3u021905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|495412(flamerobin), | |495949(kinterbasdb), | |496433(RussianFedora) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 11:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 07:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031155.n43Bt6sP021635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031201.n43C1em2019401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-03 08:01:39 EDT --- Desktop file includes a mime type, but you are not updating the desktop-database, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database Plus you are not installing the mime stuff, see kde/install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031206.n43C6wgG023639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 08:06:57 EDT --- Ok, the review process is done in the comments to ticket 488100: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100#c66 I'm sponsoring you, and this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031209.n43C923V020453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031210.n43CAGgO020982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031211.n43CBGWN024465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 08:11:15 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I sponsored Philippe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031211.n43CBt4r024572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031211.n43CBXDv024515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-03 08:11:32 EDT --- Unblocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR - I sponsored Philippe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480607] Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031216.n43CG6D5021935@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480607 Yuan Yijun changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bbbush.yuan at gmail.com Bug 480607 depends on bug 490101, which changed state. Bug 490101 Summary: Upgrade dbus-java to 2.5.1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490101 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 12:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 08:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031224.n43COqFE022953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 08:24:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Desktop file includes a mime type, but you are not updating the > desktop-database, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database Done. I'll post the new spec after you have reviewed other stuff as well. > Plus you are not installing the mime stuff, see kde/install. Okay, about half the files are missing from chemical-mime-data. These really should go there as they are not application specific files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 13:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 09:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator Alias: perl-Text-Textile https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Textile/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Textile.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Text::Textile is a Perl-based implementation of Dean Allen's Textile syntax. Textile is shorthand for doing common formatting tasks. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333759 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 13:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 09:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031316.n43DGUbV002265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 09:16:29 EDT --- pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 13:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 09:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031345.n43Dj2NA003174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Ryan Bair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ryandbair at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Ryan Bair 2009-05-03 09:45:01 EDT --- I added the two patches as attachments to the bug. The first patch is against the spec file and the second patch is against the unpacked source tarball. Both patches fix the assumption that the libdir should be in prefix/lib (/usr/lib) which works on x86 but not on x86_64 (where it is /usr/lib64). Also, the x86_64 build does not work because of the pc file issue described in bug 490025 (which I also wrote a patch for yesterday). I would mark it as a blocker, but I don't seem to have access to do so. I'm not trying to take over your package, just fixing a few miscellaneous issues that prevented me from compiling/installing/using/enjoying the package myself. As a warning, I am new to both RPM packaging and the Fedora guidelines so I could have committed a major sin. Please check my patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 13:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 09:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031353.n43DrHHo007568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #9 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 09:53:16 EDT --- That is a rather interesting question. Traditionally I have always shipped static libs as part of the -devel package just in case someone does actually want to build static linked, although I imagine is likely extremely rare to see this happen anymore for anything produced for a mainline distro (embedded on the other hand certainly...) outside I think of perhaps those who are creating proprietary/source secret binaries and I have no interest in that myself. Shipping static libs as a separate -static package seems acceptable to me, just like the debug package is separate from devel. The reason I set attr for ucommon-config is that automake/autoconf generated Make kept dropping the execute attribute when installing that file. All these changes I will add. I recall that historically %configure only had set CFLAGS with RPM_OPT_FLAGS, and NOT CXXFLAGS (hence C++ never by default built with optimizations). I gather this has changed... I like all of these comments and changes...I will also feed them back into the tarball generated spec upstream... Updated: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-2.src.rpm http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 13:53:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 09:53:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] New: Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Summary: Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wavemon.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wavemon-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Project URL: http://eden-feed.erg.abdn.ac.uk/wavemon/ Description: wavemon is a wireless device monitoring application that allows you to watch all important information like device configuration, encryption, and power management parameters and network information at once. Adaptive level bargraphs for link quality, signal/noise strength and signal-to-noise ratio. The customizeable "level alarm" feature that notices the user of changes in signal level strength audibly and/or visually. wavemon is able to list of access points in range and shows full-screen level histogram displaying signal/noise levels and SNR. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334026 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint wavemon* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint wavemon-0.6-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 14:14:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:14:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031414.n43EEJfU010461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #8 from Paul Fox 2009-05-03 10:14:18 EDT --- okay -- i get the message. :-) a sugar bug was filed some time ago, and the patch mechanism was always intended as an interim solution. i have some new ideas on how things should work, and since olpc-powerd (the next package i'll be submitting for review) has a similar patching issue, i'll solve them both before continuing. many thanks for the comments thus far! paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 14:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031418.n43EIuO6007958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-03 10:18:55 EDT --- For bugs tracking: .desktop file and icon : https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?13468 optflags and targets : https://gna.org/bugs/index.php?13469 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 14:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031448.n43Emvfj015833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 14:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031448.n43EmhSw015784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-03 10:48:42 EDT --- Hi, FULL review done, here are the results: MUST FIX: -add comments how *exactly* to generate the tarbal from svn -License should be GPLv2+ -Patch Makefile to not pass -O3 to gcc, that is not part of the default Fedora CFLAGS Should FIX: -Preserve timestamps of docs while converting them, replace: iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 $f >$f.conv && mv $f.conv $f with: iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 $f >$f.conv touch -r $f $f.conv mv $f.conv $f -Is the BuildRequires: subversion really needed ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 14:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 10:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031457.n43Ev1a3013881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-03 10:57:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I'll have a new look once you have fixed the time stamp problem. The issue about the broken time stamps seems to be a typical problem for googlecode hosted projects. A little test with one of my other packages which is hosted at googlecode. [fab at laptop24 SOURCES]$ LC_ALL=C wget -N http://backup-light.googlecode.com/files/backup-light-0.4.tar.gz --2009-05-03 16:54:54-- http://backup-light.googlecode.com/files/backup-light-0.4.tar.gz Resolving backup-light.googlecode.com... 74.125.43.82 Connecting to backup-light.googlecode.com|74.125.43.82|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 13111 (13K) [application/x-gzip] Last-modified header missing -- time-stamps turned off. --2009-05-03 16:54:54-- http://backup-light.googlecode.com/files/backup-light-0.4.tar.gz <-----%>----------> -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031521.n43FLdKg017758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 11:21:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #9) > > I'll have a new look once you have fixed the time stamp problem. > > The issue about the broken time stamps seems to be a typical problem for > googlecode hosted projects. A little test with one of my other packages which > is hosted at googlecode. Oh but it's not the tarball itself that is the problem, since the time stamps of the files are embedded in it. What you need to do is fix the install command to use -p, as per comments 7 and 8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031528.n43FS6G2022165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 11:28:06 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031528.n43FSBcx018700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 11:28:11 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031528.n43FS2pp018661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 11:28:01 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031536.n43Fabd3023533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-03 11:36:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). lkoji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333726 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0c4b9383741e71a2fcad20b2298c3855 Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=5, Tests=13, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.32 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.42 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc12.noarch -> Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv) = 0.03 Requires: perl(MRO::Compat) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031539.n43FdK5c023777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-03 11:39:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). lkoji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333730 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 505213e26be3e46ed03d47f0c955f5f9 Term-Prompt-1.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.06 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.11 CPU) + Package perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc12.noarch -> Provides: perl(Term::Prompt) = 1.04 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006001 perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Term::ReadKey) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031536.n43FafeS023563@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-03 11:36:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). lkoji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333703 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1bd5edb5df1530fb71c4c3c5ba22916a Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=6, Tests=60, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.02 sys + 1.63 cusr 0.17 csys = 1.89 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc12.noarch-> Provides: perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache) = 0.08 perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Backend) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Backend::Memory) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Choose::KeyRegexes) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Curried) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Store::Memory) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Backend::Memory) perl(Catalyst::Plugin::Cache::Curried) perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(MRO::Compat) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Storable) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031539.n43FdlKs023917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-03 11:39:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). lkoji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1333759 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 227cc4c97850b4f8448fa2d73c9c328a Text-Textile-2.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=5, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.47 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.62 CPU) + Package perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc12.noarch -> Provides: perl(Text::Textile) = 2.03 Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031548.n43FmaTR025254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-03 11:48:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1332443 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6f5920facb98b20923559f57608bb6ef Term-Completion-0.91.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test outputs Files=9, Tests=100, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.02 sys + 0.70 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.89 CPU) + Package perl-Term-Completion-0.91-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Term::Completion) = 0.91 perl(Term::Completion::Multi) = 0.90 perl(Term::Completion::Path) = 0.90 perl(Term::Completion::_POSIX) perl(Term::Completion::_readkey) perl(Term::Completion::_stty) perl(Term::Completion::_termsize) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(IO::Handle) perl(POSIX) perl(Term::ReadKey) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031557.n43FvL8T023132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031556.n43FuqEf022998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031556.n43FuekO022963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 11:56:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache Short Description: Flexible caching support for Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031556.n43Fuxo9023067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 11:56:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-Prompt Short Description: Perl extension for prompting a user for information Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031557.n43FvJsn026742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 11:57:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Textile Short Description: A humane web text generator Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031556.n43FuhVn026612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031557.n43Fv2AY026681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031556.n43FuneR026644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 11:56:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv Short Description: Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 15:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 11:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031554.n43FsqYI026085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 11:54:51 EDT --- Dank je wel, Hans. All issues should be addressed now, both MUST and SHOULD. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/grfcodec.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 16:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 12:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031617.n43GHrX9030107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|firebird | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031730.n43HUSOH005247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-03 13:30:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031738.n43HcN2N006382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 13:38:22 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334190 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:43:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:43:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031743.n43Hh824007264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031743.n43Hh5Uq007237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 13:43:05 EDT --- Generally speaking, dos2unix (or the ever popular "sed -e 's/\r//'") doesn't strictly belong in %prep, but it fits far better in there than it does in %build. Stripping dos-like EOL characters from source is as much preparing it as is patching it, or removing errant execute bits, etc. Absent a very compelling reason, we wouldn't include a %patch in %build, would we? koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334190 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 0034e6c7961d2f9ed8b5e6ad60ac7333941d73d9 Acme-PlayCode-0.11.tar.gz 0034e6c7961d2f9ed8b5e6ad60ac7333941d73d9 Acme-PlayCode-0.11.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Acme::PlayCode) = 0.11 perl-Acme-PlayCode = 0.11-2.fc12 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::Averything) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::DoubleToSingle) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::ExchangeCondition) = 0.10 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::NumberPlus) = 0.11 perl(Acme::PlayCode::Plugin::PrintComma) = 0.10 ====> requires for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Data::Dumper) perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Path::Class) perl(PPI) perl(PPI::Token::Comment) perl(vars) =====> perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Acme-PlayCode-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm dos2unix perl(List::MoreUtils) perl(Module::Build) perl(Moose) >= 0.57 perl(MooseX::Object::Pluggable) >= 0.0008 perl(Path::Class) >= 0.16 perl(PPI) >= 1.201 perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031758.n43HwZAp013460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031755.n43Ht24D013078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #9 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 13:55:01 EDT --- Hmm... looks like a small ruby script hardcoded to use http://www.rafb.net/paste. Given that both of these packages provide similar base functionality (but this one supproting significantly more), I wonder if it wouldn't be approprate to just have perl-App-Nopaste explicitly Conflict: with nopaste; or perhaps leverage the alternatives system (see, e.g. man update-alternatives). I admittedly know a very small amount about the alternatives system, but it would seem to fit this situation... Anyways, I've probably hijacked the review tix enough :) Let me know if there's anything I can do if you decide to go either of those routes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 17:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 13:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031758.n43HwbF9009561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 18:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031826.n43IQmoX017885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-03 14:26:46 EDT --- Assigning. Before doing full-review - Why is %install section empty this time? - Please consider to use %?dist tag: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag - Is this the expected behavior on ucommon-config.in? ---------------------------------------------------------------- 16 if [ "`ldd /bin/sh | grep lib64`" = "" ] 17 then 18 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib 19 else 20 libdir=${exec_prefix}/lib64 21 fi .... .... 56 case "$1" in 57 --prefix=*) 58 prefix=$optarg 59 includedir=$prefix/include 60 libdir=$prefix/lib 61 ;; ---------------------------------------------------------------- Here when --prefix or --exec_prefix is specified, libdir will always points to XXXXX/lib even on 64 bits architecture. - Please follow Fedora's %changelog format: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs ! For sipwitch please submit a new review request for the package and make this review request block the review request for sipwitch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 18:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031831.n43IVUov014761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 18:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031831.n43IVTBj014740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 14:31:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Term-Completion Short Description: Read one line of user input, with convenience functions Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 18:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031830.n43IUEmj018474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 14:30:13 EDT --- Let me know when perl-JavaScript-Minifier is in rawhide :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 18:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 14:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031838.n43IcWQn015739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-03 14:38:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: firebird Short Description: SQL relational database management system Owners: Philippe Makowski Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 19:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031910.n43JArs4024436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-03 15:10:52 EDT --- It may be nice, if you can tell the upstream authors, that this is important to get a minimum of QA insurance, to make sure, that the package works well on all of our supoorted plattforms. Even if you can build an application for a specific plattform, you doesn't have the warrenty, that the application will run on this specific plattform. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 19:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498197] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess-mobile - Zarafa Webaccess Mobile is a simple web interface for mobile phones In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031931.n43JVdKT027579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498197 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-03 15:31:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess-mobile.spec If you currently want to test this package, you need to be an approved Zarafa beta tester. Needed patch for webaccess-mobile is included in the *.nosrc.rpm package. Note, that 6.30.0 hasn't been released and I'm updating the snapshot whenever a new beta preview gets available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 19:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031933.n43JXaUr027930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #11 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 15:33:34 EDT --- Result of too much last minute editing :).... Added %?dist...and "%{__make} DESTDIR=%{buildroot}/ install" for %install. Updated %changelog entry to correct format... I will do the sipwitch one later today (or in the week) as you suggest. As for ucommon-config.in...hmm...that one I have to think about a bit. I actually use pkgconfig, so I do not normally think about ucommon-config :), and passing --prefix is perhaps a less common use case. This may be an issue to resolve for the next upstream patch release... Updated files: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-3.src.rpm There was a time I used to create a lot of rpm packages, but that was years ago... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 19:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 15:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498195] Review Request: zarafa-webaccess - Zarafa Webaccess featuring a 'Look & Feel' similar to Outlook In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905031944.n43JirCK025476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498195 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-03 15:44:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa-webaccess.spec If you currently want to test this package, you need to be an approved Zarafa beta tester. Needed patch for webaccess is included in the *.nosrc.rpm package. Note, that 6.30.0 hasn't been released and I'm updating the snapshot whenever a new beta preview gets available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:12:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032012.n43KCqvH002070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 LukasHetzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |luhe at gmx.at --- Comment #5 from LukasHetzi 2009-05-03 16:12:51 EDT --- rpmlint output: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package naming and spec file name is correct. License is correct. Spec file is legible, but doesn't consistently use macros (see below) Package is correct. - Do not mix $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} - You could copy all php files in one line -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032024.n43KOjrP003743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498837 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032026.n43KQsBg004289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #12 from David Sugar 2009-05-03 16:26:53 EDT --- rpmlint gave me a couple of useful additional things: ucommon.src: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install ucommon.src: W: non-standard-group System/Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] New: Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically Alias: perl-Any-Moose https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Summary: Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Any-Moose OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Any-Moose.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Any-Moose-0.07-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows one to take advantage of the features Moose/Mouse provides, while allowing one to let the program author determine if Moose or Mouse should be used; when use'd, we load Mouse if Moose isn't already loaded, otherwise we go with Moose. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334395 Additional Comment: This is a new dep of Data::Visitor 0.24 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032029.n43KTukZ004639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032037.n43Kb8hH001555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |needinfo?(gp at zimt.uni-siege | |n.de) --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 16:37:07 EDT --- Do you have a timeframe in which you plan on submitting this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498839] New: Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-so.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-so-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Somali hunspell dictionary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032040.n43KeBNt002084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 16:40:10 EDT --- Marking as blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481442] Review Request: clutter-perl - Perl bindings to the Clutter OpenGL canvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032042.n43KgYtR006886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481442 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |needinfo?(allisson at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-03 16:42:33 EDT --- Marking needinfo w.r.t. comment #1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032046.n43Kk7FD003125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #15 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-03 16:46:05 EDT --- (update - can't work on this this weekend but will monday or tuesday.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 20:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 16:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032043.n43Kh6I5002443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-03 16:43:05 EDT --- Oh, this has been left hanging, sorry. Lukas is right: you are mixing macros which is not allowed. Choose either $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %{buildroot} and stick with it, don't mix the two. Also, I don't like to see macros used for standard unix commands, but this is maybe more a matter of style. I think it just makes the spec file harder to read. I'll trust you to fix the macro issue upon import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 22:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032205.n43M5nK9015558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #11 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-03 18:05:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > I added the two patches as attachments to the bug. The first patch is against > the spec file and the second patch is against the unpacked source tarball. Both > patches fix the assumption that the libdir should be in prefix/lib (/usr/lib) > which works on x86 but not on x86_64 (where it is /usr/lib64). Also, the x86_64 > build does not work because of the pc file issue described in bug 490025 (which > I also wrote a patch for yesterday). I would mark it as a blocker, but I don't > seem to have access to do so. > > I'm not trying to take over your package, just fixing a few miscellaneous > issues that prevented me from compiling/installing/using/enjoying the package > myself. Is not what I meant, is just that you are making changes to a also newbie guy package, so I don't have a clue if your patchs are correct or not, thats is way I was waiting to some sponsor/experienced guys to let what to do with the packaes. But sure, if in the meantime you test some of your patch and you know that makes the magic, so then is a step forward, is just that we are going to wait for someone that really tell us that our changes are correct...Still have lot of doubts about how koji works, etc... Thanks!! Mauricio.. > > As a warning, I am new to both RPM packaging and the Fedora guidelines so I > could have committed a major sin. Please check my patches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 22:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032224.n43MOIYB022117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Bug 497663 depends on bug 497662, which changed state. Bug 497662 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-03 18:24:17 EDT --- Imported and built for F-9, F10 and F-11. Imported and built a slightly older version for EL-5 to be able to fulfil the build requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 22:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032227.n43MR3bP018528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 18:27:03 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 22:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032226.n43MQx1P018498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 18:26:58 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 22:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 18:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032226.n43MQsk9018467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-03 18:26:54 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032303.n43N3kHu027783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-03 19:03:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1] rpmlint is not silent on actual package websvn.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/websvn apache websvn needs this to be able to temporarily cache some generated files. The owner is indeed apache. websvn.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/websvn/temp ../../../var/tmp I believe this warning is bogus. /var/tmp exists on the file system. I've tried to fix this, but failed. I'd love to see it fixed though and I welcome any suggestion. > 2] do you really need patch for replacing 3 lines? sed with comment in %prep > will be imho better readable. Well, the patch is perfectly legible imo. And also, I'd rather not use sed for this kind of thing, it would be too easy to break things w/o noticing. I'd rather keep a patch and possibly rebase it if the underlying code changes, rather than silently breaking it with sed. > 3] I think that it would be good to add webserver into requires. Because websnv > wouldn't work without webserver. Right, and also the package wouldn't even install because the apache user wouldn't exist. I'll add : Requires(pre): httpd (In reply to comment #4) > If the provided config files works with httpd I think it's better to require it > rather than a generic web server. On the other hand, those _not_ wanting to use > httpd as web server will be disappointed... > > A possible solution to this (used in the mantis package) is to split the config > file in a subpackage and let that require httpd. It looks a bit too much to me to have a subpackage just for the apache conf and I'm not sure this would be enough anyway, because some files are owned by the apache user. Actually, I've never used any other webserver, and I'm not sure how, say lighttpd, works (user, conf file, etc...). I'll dig the guidelines for advices. Any pointers welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] New: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Summary: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/R-msm.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/R-msm-0.8.2-1.fc10.src.rpm [FE-NEEDSPONSOR] That is my third package for Fedora, but the first one for R, and I thus still need a sponsor. ------------------------------------------------ Description: Functions for fitting general continuous-time Markov and hidden Markov multi-state models to longitudinal data. Both Markov transition rates and the hidden Markov output process can be modelled in terms of covariates. A variety of observation schemes are supported, including processes observed at arbitrary times, completely-observed processes, and censored states. Web site: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/ ------------------------------------------------ Additional notes: * I followed the R-specific guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R). * I need that package, as it is a dependency of another package I would like to submit, namely R-RM2 (for which I shall open a distinct package review request). ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032313.n43NDJlt025039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032313.n43NDhPH025082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032315.n43NFU2B029759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905032315.n43NFVH5029784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |498846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] New: Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Summary: Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/R-RM2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/R-RM2-0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm [FE-NEEDSPONSOR] That is my fourth package for Fedora, but the second one for R, and I thus still need a sponsor. ------------------------------------------------ Description: RM2 is a simple package that implements functions used in revenue management and pricing environments. Web site: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/RM2/ ------------------------------------------------ Additional notes: * I followed the R-specific guidelines (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R). * That package requires the R-msm package, which I submitted for review/approval separately (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845) ------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 3 23:35:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 19:35:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] New: Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Summary: Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekcejk at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This application is especially designed for generating an image (e.g. PNG) from a LaTeX equation, this using a nice GUI. Support for Copy-Paste, Save as image/pdf/ps and drag-and-drop is included. In addition to supporting a whole GUI-based user interface, this package includes the library KLFBackend to integrate KLatexFormula functionality into your programs. $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-debuginfo-3.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-devel-3.0.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm klatexformula.src: W: %ifarch-applied-patch Patch0: klatexformula-lib64.patch 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 00:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 20:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040001.n4401rlS003833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Ryan Bair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #342187|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #342189|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #12 from Ryan Bair 2009-05-03 20:01:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342262) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342262) Update spec file Going the (seemingly) preferred route of fixing the install process in the spec as opposed to the source itself. I feel pretty good with this one. Comments? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 01:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 21:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040127.n441Rnxq011175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org --- Comment #33 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-03 21:27:44 EDT --- Besides, for Boost 1.37 (Fedora 11 / Rawhide), there seems to be an issue with the dependency on libicu, as in the build.log of RMOL (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1334520&name=root.log): DEBUG backend.py:554: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ resolvedep 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:280: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ resolvedep 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:256: 0:libicu-4.2-0.1.d03.fc12.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:gsl-devel-1.12-3.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:ghostscript-8.64-6.fc12.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:cppunit-devel-1.12.1-2.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:texlive-latex-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:boost-devel-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 1:doxygen-1.5.8-2.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:256: 0:texlive-dvips-2007-42.fc11.x86_64 DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 0 DEBUG backend.py:554: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ install 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:280: Executing command: /usr/bin/yum --installroot /var/lib/mock/dist-f12-build-444978-72210/root/ install 'libicu' 'gsl-devel >= 1.8' 'ghostscript' 'cppunit-devel >= 1.10' 'texlive-latex' 'boost-devel >= 1.34' 'doxygen' 'texlive-dvips' DEBUG util.py:256: boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 from build has depsolving problems DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: libicuuc.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 from build has depsolving problems DEBUG util.py:256: --> Missing Dependency: libicui18n.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: libicuuc.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem DEBUG util.py:256: Error: Missing Dependency: libicui18n.so.40()(64bit) is needed by package boost-1.37.0-6.fc11.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:256: You could try running: package-cleanup --problems DEBUG util.py:256: package-cleanup --dupes DEBUG util.py:256: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest DEBUG util.py:256: The program package-cleanup is found in the yum-utils package. DEBUG util.py:319: Child returncode was: 1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040317.n443HiNx000307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #6 from arthurguru 2009-05-03 23:17:43 EDT --- Hi Silas, I'm using f7 which still uses python 2.5 (r25:51908, Apr 10 2007) (which is why I stressed "on my machine"). I'm building against the source archive as: % rpmbuild -ba funcshell.spec The build works, but the egg-info file is not present in %{buildroot}, which then fails the packaging part of the spec file. Not familiar with python history but 2 years is a long time in software. If its a version issue and f7 is not reaching end-of-life status with looming f11 then maybe some advanced packaging syntax could be used in the specfile. E.g. BuildRequires: python >= Kind Regards, Arthur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040316.n443Gekq032694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:16:37 EDT --- Andreas: Sorry for hijacking here, but we really need to have this review done. I hope you don't mind I take over? OK - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines OK - Spec file matches base package name. OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. OK - License OK - License field in spec matches OK - License file included in package OK - Spec in American English OK - Spec is legible. OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: 3d519bc7d812aed8f6e4288b6d3cdf26 gnome-media-2.26.0.tar.bz2 3d519bc7d812aed8f6e4288b6d3cdf26 gnome-media-2.26.0.tar.bz2.orig OK - Package needs ExcludeArch OK - BuildRequires correct OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. OK - Package has a correct %clean section. OK - Package has correct buildroot OK - Package is code or permissible content. OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. OK - Package has rm -rf RPM_BUILD_ROOT at top of %install OK - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files. OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. OK - Package obey's FHS standard (except for 2 exceptions) See below - No rpmlint output. OK - final provides and requires are sane. SHOULD Items: OK - Should build in mock. OK - Should have sane scriptlets. OK - Should have dist tag OK - Should package latest version OK - Should not use file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin Issues: 1. Should the Requires: gnome-media be versioned? Or will it cause any issue for this to be out of step with gnome-media? I suspect not, but though I would mention it. 2. rpmlint says: gst-mixer.src:163: W: macro-in-%changelog defines Minor issue... change to %%defines in changelog? :) gst-mixer.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gst-mixer.schemas Can be ignored. I don't see any blockers here, so this package is APPROVED. Fix the %%define and address if gnome-media requires should be versioned before import? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040325.n443P0Qd029062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #15 from arthurguru 2009-05-03 23:24:59 EDT --- Packet delayed - I use the far less luxurious option of internet dial-up - though not by choice. Is there anything outstanding? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040327.n443RtGv001883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040327.n443RQ59001783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |iarnell at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |iarnell at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-03 23:27:25 EDT --- + source files match upstream. d159b8b99180599ecc618078c93f3501da8c1469 Any-Moose-0.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + summary is OK. + description is OK. + dist tag is present. + build root is OK. + license field matches the actual license. GPL+ or Artistic + license is open source-compatible. + license text is included. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package builds in mock http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334395 + package installs properly. + rpmlint has no complaints: perl-Any-Moose.src: I: checking perl-Any-Moose.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + final provides and requires are sane: perl(Any::Moose) = 0.07 perl-Any-Moose = 0.07-1.fc12 = rpm -qp --requires perl-Any-Moose-0.07-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Mouse) >= 0.20 perl(strict) perl(warnings) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 + %check is present and all tests pass. All tests successful. Files=13, Tests=49, 5 wallclock secs ( 0.09 usr 0.01 sys + 4.76 cusr 0.14 csys = 5.00 CPU) Result: PASS + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no generically named files + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040336.n443aobT031111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #13 from Ed Brand 2009-05-03 23:36:48 EDT --- OK, apologies for the delay. Had a series of personal issues to resolve. In reading through the comments, here is a summary of what we've got.. a/ no issue b/ no issue c/ no issue d/ no issue e/ no issue f/ no issue g/ * W: non-standard-uid /usr/bin/sslogger slogger h/ * E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/sslogger slogger 06555 i/ * E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/sl 0750 j/ in progress... k/ no issue l/ convince me of the need of %pre, %post, %prein m/ no issue n/ no issue README ... in progress So lets start a dialogue on the suid, user/group, and permission: Here is what I was looking to accomplish: - Create a binary which allows the user to gain access to another user's account, including root, whilst logging all keystrokes. - Create group of users "sloggers" whose members are permitted to review/audit other users activities. Hence the /i 750 Breaking it down, g/ I need a suid user/group, as I am reluctant to create a suid root binary. True the Makefile installed as suid root which the spec file later changes permission to the other "non standard" user/group in the %pre/%post. This is related to /k. h/ The log files are written at a lower privilege level and not as root. i/ The permission on the directory are set to exclude users that are not in the audit group "sloggers" l/ Needed to create a non-root logging audit directory. As stated, I am reluctant to crate a suid/sgid root binary. I am open to suggestions to resolve the above. Thanks -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040335.n443ZWJg003185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #13 from Eric Moret 2009-05-03 23:35:30 EDT --- Should now build on x86_64. New files at: SRPM URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet-0.1.63-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: ftp://ftp.zouric.com/public/linux/paintdotnet/paintdotnet.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:38:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:38:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040338.n443cdcB003525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:38:38 EDT --- Note that you always get a devel branch. Make sure and follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life for the devel branch. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040341.n443fn5o031905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:41:48 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040339.n443dkFi003666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:39:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040342.n443giB5004309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:42:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040343.n443hchM032122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:43:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040344.n443iS4R032208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:44:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040346.n443kIuq032731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:46:17 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040347.n443lcUK000447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:47:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040351.n443pNaW005718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:51:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040353.n443r47X005895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:53:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040353.n443rkMJ005962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:53:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040352.n443qH1O005806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:52:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040350.n443oTjU005546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:50:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040354.n443seVR001351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:54:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040358.n443wicm006867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:58:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 03:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 3 May 2009 23:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040356.n443uagG006654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-03 23:56:35 EDT --- Please use your fedora account system name in Owners. ;) cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040403.n4443jgu007712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(petersen at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #44 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-04 00:03:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > New update Thanks! > 1) carries around a ppc workaround that really should go in macros.ghc Yeah we could add something in the macros to help with this, but it is a bit tedious: I hope we can fix the real problem on ppc soon. > 2) only builds on fedora 12 (yay?) I hope to backport latest ghc to f11 soon. We might have to wait for a new gtk2hs release. > 3) converts the value added default config into a patch directly against the > upstream source. what this patch does is replaces the xmonad line of the > default verbose config with an expansion that loads xterm with the man page > showing. in the future, i'll probably add a comment to the user Good idea. I think better to rename the patch to xmonad-config-show-manpage.patch or something like that. > 4) includes just xmonad-start without doing xmonad-session. Good - I think the name in the .desktop file should just be "xmonad" or "XMonad" though not "xmonad-start". > 5) renumbers the source to make more sense > 6) includes other changes proposed here Ok Otherwise looks pretty good to me now. I am going to take it for a spin and then do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498839] Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040405.n4445CNl003270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 00:05:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334539 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 334c3dd1cbcc797dbc9f5a0f4dbaf2e3 so-SO at dictionaries.addons.mozilla.org3.xpi + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040437.n444bASd008526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498371] Review Request: fedora-devshell - Fedora Developer's Toolbox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040432.n444WaH6007822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498371 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-04 00:32:35 EDT --- Updated and built. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=100713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040437.n444bkeB013540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040439.n444dAwr013701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040436.n444atqP013450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040438.n444caPn013640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|rjones at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040437.n444bR0m008630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 04:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 00:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040458.n444wiYK016583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Bug 497661 depends on bug 497660, which changed state. Bug 497660 Summary: Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 00:58:43 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334537 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-MIME-EncWords.noarch: E: useless-provides perl(MIME::EncWords) => This package provides 2 times the same capacity. It should only provide it + source files match upstream url 2009449d0af39275d45e45a4afcaf58f MIME-EncWords-1.010.101.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=74, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 0.14 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.20 CPU) + Package perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(MIME::EncWords) perl(MIME::EncWords) = 1.010.101 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application suggestions: 1) make sure to remove unnecessary provides perl(MIME::EncWords) 2) you don't need Requires: perl(MIME::Charset) >= 1.006.2 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040505.n4455r21017804@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 01:05:52 EDT --- I also think description you included should have changed to This package is aimed to be another implementation of MIME::Words so that it will achieve more exact conformance with RFC 2047 (former RFC 1522) specifications. Additionally, it contains some improvements. Following synopsis and descriptions are inherited from its inspirer, then added descriptions on improvements (**) or changes and clarifications (*).* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040510.n445AlhY013546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-04 01:10:45 EDT --- Yeah very much. I just confirmed that debian packages also had same issues. I had a chit chat with upstream and confirmed will be working on these issues in future releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040509.n4459xcK018239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 01:09:58 EDT --- waiting for perl(YAML::XS) >= 0.32 build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334582 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040522.n445MAp5020186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Ivan Efremov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(iefremov at unipro.r | |u) | --- Comment #26 from Ivan Efremov 2009-05-04 01:22:08 EDT --- I'll update CVS branch during next 2-3 days -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040529.n445TmD9015949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 01:29:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Any-Moose Short Description: Use Moose or Mouse automagically Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040529.n445Tnfs021043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040549.n445n6R6023822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:05 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040550.n445ojhH019345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:50:45 EDT --- perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040549.n445nAHp018724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:09 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040549.n445nnLO018807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:48 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040549.n445nr9q018845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:49:52 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] New: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Summary: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/clthreads.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/clthreads-2.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Clthreads is a C++ wrapper library around the POSIX threads API. rpmlint: clthreads-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation Not much we can do about it. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334670 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040553.n445rJHT024593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:53:18 EDT --- perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:50:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:50:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040550.n445ofTt024291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:50:40 EDT --- perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040553.n445rOAB019678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 01:53:23 EDT --- perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040558.n445w4r9025377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:58:03 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498566] Review Request: perl-Config-JFDI - Just * Do it: A Catalyst::Plugin::ConfigLoader-style layer over Config::Any In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040557.n445vk37025335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498566 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:57:46 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040557.n445vxtF020426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:57:58 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040557.n445vsDi020392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:57:53 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 05:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 01:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040558.n445w7Aj020464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 01:58:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040633.n446X6bI001017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-05-04 02:33:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The spec was recreated because it is not noarch. Please elaborate. I don't see any arch-specific portions inside of this package. IMO, this package should be a "noarch" packages. > The problem in test, which I see is: > PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, > 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t > t/Kate.t .. 448/? Use of uninitialized value $ch in concatenation (.) or string > at > /home/marca/rpmbuild/BUILD/Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04/blib/lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Template.pm > line 534. I am also seeing these, but don't have a "quick fix" for it (and no time to investigate further), sorry. > I can't still get rid off double perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts). The rpmlint warning stems from these two files inside of the sources: lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Alerts vs. lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Alerts.pm They conflict. I would suspect "Alerts" to be an outdated version of "Alerts.pm", which likely was packaged into the tarball by mistake. I'd say, this is something to contact upstream about to clarify. For the moment, I'd propose to remove "Alerts" in %prep and to watch how far you will get. I tried rm -f lib/Syntax/Highlight/Engine/Kate/Alerts and found it appears to work. Further issue: Most permissions of the files inside of the tarball are wrong. Proposal: Add find -type f -exec chmod -x {} \; to %prep -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] New: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-FormValidator-Constra ints-DateTime/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This package provides constraint routines for Data::FormValidator for dealing with dates and times. It provides an easy mechanism for validating dates of any format (using strptime(3)) and transforming those dates (as long as you 'untaint' the fields) into valid DateTime objects, or into strings that would be properly formatted for various database engines. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334715 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040643.n446hQaS007785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:43:25 EDT --- python-cclib-0.91-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cclib-0.91-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:44:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:44:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040644.n446iSAl007881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:44:28 EDT --- python-cclib-0.91-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cclib-0.91-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040645.n446jNfV004659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:45:22 EDT --- gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 06:46:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 02:46:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040646.n446kB8Y004878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 02:46:10 EDT --- gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:19:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:19:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040719.n447JSuS013214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #34 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-04 03:19:27 EDT --- Denis, check your build target. It's dist-f12 not dist-f11. In dist-f12 (Fedora 12 development) there's a fresh ABI-incompatible icu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040723.n447NHQY010757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 03:23:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334715 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url adec700adf05d817e09e890d99d9a339 Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=292, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.03 sys + 1.98 cusr 0.19 csys = 2.22 CPU) + Package perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Data::FormValidator::Constraints::DateTime) = 1.09 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(DateTime) perl(DateTime::Format::Strptime) perl(Exporter) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498188] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040726.n447QDiJ014896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040726.n447QEPN014920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Bug 498189 depends on bug 498188, which changed state. Bug 498188 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier - Perl extension for minifying JavaScript code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498188 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040724.n447OjAR014357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #4 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-04 03:24:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > rpmlint output: > > apbs.src:53: W: setup-not-quiet > apbs-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > - Use "%setup -q" to fix the first warning. > done. > - Your patches are incorrectly named, add a abps- prefix to them. Send the > patches upstream. > done and done. > > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. NEEDSFIX > - You are mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}, which is not allowed. > - Please add comments about why the patches are necessary. > - You can shorten the install section with the hints given above. > - Use the same description as in the review request. The one you have now in > the SPEC is a bit too long and contains unnecessary information (the last two > paragraphs). > done. > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > - Stuff under contrib/ seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+, but nothing seems to > be packaged from there. > the libraries that are built in contrib/ are lumped into libapbs.so* (along with some of the BSD licensed functions) - I've made note of the dual license, is it sufficient/OK to annotate the .so files as "BSD and LGPLv2+" in the %files section and add a PACKAGE-LICENSING file? > > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Drop INSTALL and NEWS from %doc, include README. > done. Updated files: Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/apbs-1.1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040728.n447SfnH011707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 03:28:41 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498186] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier - beautifier for javascript In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040727.n447RRWI011518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498186 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040728.n447SdFo011668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Bug 453857 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 03:28:38 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040728.n447Sah8011638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Bug 453856 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 03:28:34 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 07:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 03:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040728.n447SiJX015420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 03:28:43 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498191] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InstallPAR - Install .par's into any installed perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040803.n4483LZk022090@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498191 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498873] New: Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 Summary: Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/thrift/thrift.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/thrift-0.0-0.fc10.20090501svn770888.src.rpm Description: Thrift is a software framework for scalable cross-language services development. It combines a powerful software stack with a code generation engine to build services that work efficiently and seamlessly between C++, Java, C#, Python, Ruby, Perl, PHP, Objective C/Cocoa, Smalltalk, Erlang, Objective Caml, and Haskell. rpmlint [silas at silas rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm thrift-erlang.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib thrift-ghc-prof.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/Thrift-0.1.0/libHSThrift-0.1.0_p.a 16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These warnings are OK according to: thrift-erlang.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455187#c6 thrift-ghc-prof.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.10.1/Thrift-0.1.0/libHSThrift-0.1.0_p.a - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470756#c8 NOTE: The summary and description were taken from a previous package by Devan Goodwin (446993). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040811.n448BHIt021330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 --- Comment #1 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-04 04:11:16 EDT --- NOTE the csharp modules is commented about because upstream doesn't provide a "strong name". I'll contact them at some point this week and get a bug filed, but otherwise it builds fine. Output from failed build: DEBUG: + gacutil -i lib/csharp/Thrift.dll -f -package Thrift -root /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/thrift-0.0-0.fc10.20090501svn770888.i386/usr/lib DEBUG: Failure adding assembly lib/csharp/Thrift.dll to the cache: Attempt to install an assembly without a strong name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040817.n448HGKL024726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 04:17:15 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040818.n448Imtv022625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 04:18:47 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498203] Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040825.n448PRLQ024057@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498193] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig - Infer Perl Configuration for non-running interpreters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040824.n448OnYf023687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498193 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040825.n448PS5F024082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Bug 498204 depends on bug 498203, which changed state. Bug 498203 Summary: Review Request: perl-YAML-LibYAML - YAML::LibYAML Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498203 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040831.n448V5VN027402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 04:31:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > > - Stuff under contrib/ seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+, but nothing seems to > > be packaged from there. > > > > the libraries that are built in contrib/ are lumped into libapbs.so* (along > with some of the BSD licensed functions) - I've made note of the dual license, > is it sufficient/OK to annotate the .so files as "BSD and LGPLv2+" in the > %files section and add a PACKAGE-LICENSING file? Damn. Then the current packaging is a no-go: you must strip apbs of the contrib packages and package them separately. At least maloc and pmg have upstreams here: http://fetk.org/ Btw, you're maintaining PyMOL, right? Does it include an own copy of apbs? If so, it should be modified to use this package instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040835.n448ZjMR028317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-04 04:35:41 EDT --- New cvs snapshot - 20090429: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-0.7.20090429cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498839] Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040835.n448Zb1G028287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-05-04 04:35:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-so Short Description: Somali hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040853.n448rCVd028757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 08:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 04:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040852.n448qsos028703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 09:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 05:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040904.n4494XFR000882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #1 from nucleo 2009-05-04 05:04:32 EDT --- New version 3.0.1 Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-3.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-devel-3.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-debuginfo-3.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 09:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 05:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040909.n4499duJ001858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #2 from nucleo 2009-05-04 05:09:38 EDT --- New version 3.0.1 Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-devel-3.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-debuginfo-3.0.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm klatexformula-3.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334890 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 09:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 05:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] New: Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing Alias: perl-Class-Mix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-Mix/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Class-Mix.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The mix_class function provided by this module dynamically generates 'anonymous' classes with specified inheritance. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334916 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 09:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 05:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040936.n449a1E4006649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 09:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 05:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905040935.n449ZwAi006623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 05:35:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime Short Description: D::FV constraints for dates and times Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 10:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041021.n44ALvB6011610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #55 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-04 06:21:54 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 10:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Pluggable-Ordered/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module behaves exactly the same as Module::Pluggable, supporting all of its options, but also mixes in the call_plugins and plugins_ordered methods to your class. call_plugins acts a little like Class::Trigger; it takes the name of a method, and some parameters. Let's say we call it like so: Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334978 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 10:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 06:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041051.n44Apav3016596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Bug 453858 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-04 06:51:35 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041104.n44B4MCV018530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 07:04:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334916 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7773c6342f20370c4b40d468da031016 Class-Mix-0.002.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=17, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 0.27 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.39 CPU) + Package perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Class::Mix) = 0.002 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041104.n44B4J27018500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-04 07:04:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334978 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a9a33859fa3ff61a845035d44a2f73e8 Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.22 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.28 CPU) + Package perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Module::Pluggable::Ordered) = 1.5 Requires: perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(UNIVERSAL::require) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041111.n44BB6PW020006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 07:11:05 EDT --- firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041110.n44BArSo019876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 07:10:52 EDT --- firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041115.n44BFZQC020814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-04 07:15:34 EDT --- Ok, fixed for review. Test problem was reported to upstream. For meanwhile could be used my patch. Alerts stop to complain, after removing the first in prep, also the permissions looks ok. Thank you for all suggestions. http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04-3.fc11.src.rpm http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041118.n44BIG70024311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #56 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-05-04 07:18:14 EDT --- i will get back to you shortly. sorry but i have been pretty busy. lets get that symlink error fixed ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041119.n44BJPRB024473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041119.n44BJNsq024445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 07:19:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-Mix Short Description: Dynamic class mixing Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041119.n44BJoGK021380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041119.n44BJm7o021355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 07:19:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered Short Description: Call module plugins in a specified order Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041110.n44BAwf0023239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 07:10:57 EDT --- firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041138.n44BcgBD024690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-05-04 07:38:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gearmand Short Description: A distributed job system Owners: ruben Branches: F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 11:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 07:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] New: Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 Summary: Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-format.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-format-0.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Gnome Format is a GNOME tool to easily format (erase and initialize) external memory media like USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards for your PC. --- Note: I was not able to use the find_lang macros since the %files section failed with a error. I am not very familiar with waf either. Any assistance is welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 12:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 08:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Context-EitherSide/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Context-EitherSide.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Suppose you have a large piece of text - typically, say, a web page or a mail message. And now suppose you've done some kind of full-text search on that text for a bunch of keywords, and you want to display the context in which you found the keywords inside the body of the text. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335200 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 13:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 09:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041337.n44DbSCe018659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #57 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-04 09:37:27 EDT --- Might be that install doesn't preserve symlinks. Here is the spec file with symlinks "made by hand". SPEC: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble-1.1.8-9.fc9.src.rpm btw, please use links above. Other ones are obsolete now. Some guys tried to access files over the wrong port even when port 81 was supplied. Errors in apache log aren't good thing :) You're able to browse all files here: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 13:41:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 09:41:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents Alias: perl-HTML-Toc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Toc/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-Toc.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents (ToC). Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335265 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 13:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 09:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041351.n44Dp6O1019170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #62 from David Halik 2009-05-04 09:50:57 EDT --- Any recent thoughts kwizart? Haven't heard any updates from you since the rpmlint issues were fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041423.n44ENOK2026248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 10:23:23 EDT --- A few notes: - From Fedora 9 onwards there is no more tetex in Fedora, the latex interpreter is texlive instead. - You must have Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership. - No need to have a separate License: tag for devel subpackage. - Devel package must Provides: %{name}-static = %{version}-%{release}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041423.n44ENhBM028675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041432.n44EWTYk031024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 10:32:27 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Time stamps not preserved, use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK - Maybe instead of %{_includedir}/* have just %{_includedir}/%{name}.h ? MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK I'll let you fix the problems upon import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041457.n44Evau0002468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:54:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:54:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041454.n44EsXrD001627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041454.n44EsZjb001648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 14:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 10:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041457.n44EvYgQ005269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 10:57:33 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335200 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (Artistic 2.0); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): a3ff22a3fd71eb46fd726933c0d6fecbdab04f34 Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4.tar.gz a3ff22a3fd71eb46fd726933c0d6fecbdab04f34 Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Text::Context::EitherSide) = 1.4 perl-Text-Context-EitherSide = 1.4-1.fc12 ====> requires for perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl >= 0:5.006 perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(constant) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) =====> perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:04:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:04:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041504.n44F4atp006830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041507.n44F7C9W007579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 11:07:11 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335265 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): dcf4bb122b04a26b1106fa1e66adcde76a9c7790 HTML-Toc-1.11.tar.gz dcf4bb122b04a26b1106fa1e66adcde76a9c7790 HTML-Toc-1.11.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(HTML::Toc) = 1.11 perl-HTML-Toc = 1.11-1.fc12 perl(HTML::TocGenerator) = 1.11 perl(HTML::TocInsertor) = 1.11 perl(HTML::TocUpdator) = 1.11 ====> requires for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(constant) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(HTML::TocGenerator) perl(HTML::TocInsertor) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(vars) =====> perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(HTML::Parser) perl(Test::Differences) perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:07:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:07:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041507.n44F7EKG005180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041504.n44F4cUP004354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:15:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:15:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041515.n44FFGZS009468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 11:15:15 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041521.n44FL02m010665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #4 from nucleo 2009-05-04 11:21:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - From Fedora 9 onwards there is no more tetex in Fedora, the latex interpreter > is texlive instead. tetex-latex is still provided by texlive-latex package - changed Requires to texlive-latex - added Requires hicolor-icon-theme - removed license tag in devel subpackage - added Provides -static in devel subpackage Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-3.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041517.n44FHxFk009925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-04 11:17:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Time stamps not preserved, use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make > install. > They are all compiled files (no need to insist for preserving timestamps in this case) but I'll add -p any > - Maybe instead of %{_includedir}/* have just %{_includedir}/%{name}.h ? > Sue, I'll do that before I commit. > > APPROVED Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: clthreads Short Description: POSIX threads C++ access library Owners: oget nando Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041525.n44FPi2f011739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041525.n44FPwZY011797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041525.n44FPudN011770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 11:25:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-Toc Short Description: Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:25:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:25:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041525.n44FPf5g009343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 11:25:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide Short Description: Get n words either side of search keywords Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041531.n44FV3mK010533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 11:31:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - Time stamps not preserved, use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make > > install. > > > > They are all compiled files (no need to insist for preserving timestamps in > this case) but I'll add -p any The header file too? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041538.n44Fcc0e014357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 11:38:37 EDT --- We need a br on Test::Pod; and the third word from the end of the second line of %description should probably be "without", not "which" :) The XS.so in the requires should be filtered, as it's a privat plugin library for Perl that isn't in the system lib paths. A construct like the following, inserted before %description, will do the trick. (see, e.g. perl-CSS-Minifier-XS) # don't "provide" private Perl libs %global _use_internal_dependency_generator 0 %global __deploop() while read FILE; do /usr/lib/rpm/rpmdeps -%{1} ${FILE}; done | /bin/sort -u %global __find_provides /bin/sh -c "%{__grep} -v '%{perl_vendorarch}/.*\\.so$' | %{__deploop P}" %global __find_requires /bin/sh -c "%{__deploop R}" Please add the BR and *.so filtering. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335368 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 2f82abee406d893e3938eb29b32f80d7b2b5cd8d JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05.tar.gz 2f82abee406d893e3938eb29b32f80d7b2b5cd8d JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires will be sane, once XS.so has been removed from the provides: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc12.ppc.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc12.ppc.rpm perl(JavaScript::Minifier::XS) = 0.05 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS = 0.05-1.fc12 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS(ppc-32) = 0.05-1.fc12 XS.so ====> requires for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc12.ppc.rpm libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) =====> perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(JavaScript::Minifier) perl(Module::Build) perl(Test::More) =====> perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo-0.05-1.fc12.ppc.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo.ppc: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo-0.05-1.fc12.ppc.rpm perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo = 0.05-1.fc12 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo(ppc-32) = 0.05-1.fc12 ====> requires for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo-0.05-1.fc12.ppc.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 15:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 11:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498654] Review Request: uget - A download manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041545.n44FjQuH016308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498654 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-04 11:45:24 EDT --- Rebuilt, will submit push requests on bodhi. Thank you for review and CVS procedure! Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041613.n44GDF6C020489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-04 12:13:14 EDT --- nope. you're right :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041617.n44GH90U023624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 453861 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453861 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453861 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-04 12:17:08 EDT --- I made the full review. Everything seems fine. - The rpmlint globus-gsi-credential-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored - Koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335419 -------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gsi-credential) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] New: Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser Alias: perl-XML-TokeParser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-TokeParser/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-TokeParser.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: XML::TokeParser provides a procedural ("pull mode") interface to XML::Parser in much the same way that Gisle Aas' HTML::TokeParser provides a procedural interface to HTML::Parser. XML::TokeParser splits its XML input up into "tokens," each corresponding to an XML::Parser event. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335514 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041622.n44GMsax024900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #17 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-05-04 12:22:52 EDT --- One of the point of having wrappers is to ensure that the server is started using proper permissions and running as a proper user. We tend to get a lot of bug reports related to this stuff, which aren't really bugs, because users simply forget about it. So I would rather leave as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041628.n44GS1PE023934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041626.n44GQPCt023686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |497283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041627.n44GR80Q023763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041626.n44GQO6j023661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarnell at gmail.com Depends on| |498977(perl-XML-TokeParser) --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 12:26:23 EDT --- I've built and installed this (it's needed for MojoMojo too) and discovered that the resulting binary has a dependency on perl(XML::TokeParser) which doesn't yet exist in Fedora. Review at bug #498977. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041627.n44GRWaG026070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041628.n44GS30b026139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041630.n44GUxOH026810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 12:30:59 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335514 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): d2267f1f416ecc96b67ad57c7748f29438d87bf3 XML-TokeParser-0.05.tar.gz d2267f1f416ecc96b67ad57c7748f29438d87bf3 XML-TokeParser-0.05.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(XML::TokeParser) = 0.05 perl-XML-TokeParser = 0.05-1.fc12 perl(XML::TokeParser::Token) ====> requires for perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Carp) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(XML::Parser) =====> perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(XML::Parser) >= 2 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041631.n44GV2gM024752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 16:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 12:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041655.n44GtwP0029105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-04 12:55:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I will fix the point outlined above before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MIME-EncWords Short Description: perl module to deal with RFC 2047 encoded words Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041727.n44HRt2c003357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-04 13:27:54 EDT --- Updated package : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-MIME-EncWords.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041731.n44HVLgg006066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 13:31:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-TokeParser Short Description: Simplified interface to XML::Parser Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041730.n44HUEgx005863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-04 13:30:12 EDT --- 1.) What this line should mean? Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) This may caused, that you have to rebuild your package for every new perl version which will been released. 2.) For what do you need this statements? find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* Keep in mind, that References: Message-ID: <200905041731.n44HVNu3004229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041732.n44HW7Pp004292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041739.n44Hds6D007222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-04 13:39:52 EDT --- I have done some examinations. The results are: 1.) We should remove the following lines: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* 2.) The descriptions for the svnnotify contains a line with more the 79 characters. This will be complainted by rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:40:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:40:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041740.n44Heh4b007734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-04 13:40:42 EDT --- Understood (however, I still don't like this silly solution). * Ok, it builds fine in Koji for F-11: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335580 Unfortunately, it failed to build in EL-5: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335591 If you decided to add EPEl branch for rabbitmq, then this needs fixing. * rpmling is not silent: [petro at Sulaco ~]$ rpmlint Desktop/rabbitmq-server-1.5.4-1.ppc.rpm rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: no-binary rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/rabbitmq 0750 rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/rabbitmq 0750 rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbitmq-server 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ~]$ All these messages, except missing-lsb-keyword may be ignored. Message "missing-lsb-keyword" should be suppressed by adding proper LSB keyword to init-script (at least with empty value). BTW are you still searching for sponsor? I cannot find you in "sponsorship queue". What's your Fedora account name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041748.n44Hmbgf007590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-04 13:48:36 EDT --- I have found out, that a new release 2.79 is available now. So if you can provide a new package based on this release and fixed the issues described on comment #7 and #8, we can start an official review of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:51:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:51:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041751.n44HpoMR009906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041752.n44HqWGe010061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #9 from Paul Fox 2009-05-04 13:52:30 EDT --- i've now eliminated the need for the patch to sugar without a lot of disruption. olpc-kbdshim-hal now takes care of the rotation and brightness bindings itself. the new spec file and rpm are here. i think this catches me up with the current set of review comments. Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim.spec-6-1 SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim-6-1.src.rpm (and binary rpm in the parent) -paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041757.n44HvhRV009790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-04 13:57:41 EDT --- OK, it's up now. Same URL as the previous -2 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041756.n44HupaY009634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-04 13:56:50 EDT --- I can't really see any big problems that would be caused by not versioning the gnome-media requires, but let me know if I'm missing anything. I'm just about to send a revised -2 package with the changelog changed (it seems a bit recursive to bump to -3 and add a changelog entry to say I changed the changelog...:>) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041756.n44HujEA009555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-05-04 13:56:44 EDT --- Mauricio, I'd apply the changes from Ryan to fix outstanding issues. If you don't understand why something is being done, go ahead and ask here before applying that section and either Ryan or I can explain what's being done and whether there are other/better ways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 17:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 13:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041757.n44HvbY5011227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-04 13:57:35 EDT --- For 2.0.5-3 (after actually rebuilding this package) * Group: - For this package: "System Environment/Libraries" is suggested. * Cleaning buildroot at %install - At %install, %buildroot should be cleaned out first (example by: -------------------------------------------------------------- %install rm -rf %{buildroot} make install \ DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" \ install -------------------------------------------------------------- * Timestamp - Please use -------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}/ INSTALL="install -p" install -------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files (especially on installed header files). This method (i.e. INSTALL="install -p") usually works for Makefiles generated from recent autotools. * build error - -3 does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335547 You have to remove libtool .la file at %install explicitly. * Some rpmlint issue -------------------------------------------------------------- ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00086_f713234fbd42ca1e50a2436c591bfa19_cgraph.map ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00022_bbc045601d13615d2284212f7b491bc0_cgraph.map ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00086_1290f048a8f9116ba2aafaafe228e702_cgraph.map ucommon-doc.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/ucommon-doc-2.0.5/a00086_d20f9bc12070f452b6b872d21736174a_cgraph.map ..... ..... -------------------------------------------------------------- - Are these empty map files needed? Or is it correct that these empty files are created? ! Some notes: (In reply to comment #9) > That is a rather interesting question. Traditionally I have always shipped > static libs as part of the -devel package just in case someone does actually > want to build static linked, although I imagine is likely extremely rare to see > this happen anymore for anything produced for a mainline distro (embedded on > the other hand certainly...) outside I think of perhaps those who are creating > proprietary/source secret binaries and I have no interest in that myself. > Shipping static libs as a separate -static package seems acceptable to me, just > like the debug package is separate from devel. - If you think so, I suggest to remove static archive completely. > The reason I set attr for ucommon-config is that automake/autoconf generated > Make kept dropping the execute attribute when installing that file. - Personally, I would set permission at %install rather than using %attr like ----------------------------------------------------------------- %install .... .... chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/ucommon-config ----------------------------------------------------------------- (except the case where using %attr is unavoidable like %attr(2755,root,games)) ! Note 2 - Just noting again that for sipwitch please submit a seperate review request for sipwitch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041803.n44I3d4R010921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 14:03:38 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041804.n44I4uD8011296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 14:04:55 EDT --- Looks dandy. Feel free to request cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041815.n44IFptg013562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 --- Comment #35 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-04 14:15:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Denis, check your build target. It's dist-f12 not dist-f11. In dist-f12 (Fedora > 12 development) there's a fresh ABI-incompatible icu. You are right, of course. However, the (Fedora CVS) devel branch now corresponds to F12 (and no longer to F11). And, as far as I understand (from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Request_Builds), in order to submit an update of RMOL (bug 489233), I first need to have RMOL build successfully on the devel branch, that is, for F12. I have tried to add explicit dependency on libicu (and libicu-devel) in the RPM specification file, but the build did not succeed either. The issue seems to come from a non-explicit dependency of Boost-1.37. That's why I posted my comment on this bug report (but maybe bug 496188 is more appropriate?). I have no Rawhide distribution, so I cannot test it directly on my machine. Any feedback will be welcome on how I should proceed (to be able to build the new version of RMOL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041841.n44If2oI019639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 14:41:01 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xcowsay-1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225622] Merge Review: boost In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041839.n44Idltf018958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225622 --- Comment #36 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-04 14:39:46 EDT --- You can submit builds for each branch in cvs separately. devel : currently won't build, as somebody would first need to do a rebuild of boost (for the new libicu) -- I could submit a rebuild attempt in koji but the provenpackagers guidelines are not clear on that unfortunately -- packages that build successfully in devel will be published in Rawhide automatically (on the next day) but only as soon as the F-11 freeze is over F-11 F-10 F-9 : builds done for these targets need to be released as updates via the Fedora Updates System (bodhi) If you have other questions, let's do it in private mail as not to flood this Merge Review ticket. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:51:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:51:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041851.n44IpIuv021916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 14:51:17 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041850.n44IojaN020656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 14:50:45 EDT --- Once you have fixed the mock build issue I will review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041856.n44IuV21023042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 14:56:29 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041854.n44IsCkF022364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Depends on| |499003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041856.n44IuBsu023001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 14:56:10 EDT --- - Optflags are not used. Use make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} - What is the stuff the package installs in %{_datadir} that you remove? Once you've fixed these I'll review the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 18:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041857.n44Iv28E022133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 14:57:01 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 19:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041909.n44J9xc2025721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu Flag| |needinfo?(allisson at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 15:09:57 EDT --- Flagging as needinfo/REPORTER, so it's clear to me where we're at from the buglist. No pressure :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 19:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041910.n44JAK6k024779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |perl-MooseX-Method -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 19:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041932.n44JWJ9R030388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-04 15:32:17 EDT --- Eric, are you in touch with the art team? Any news on the icons? Are they really producing all these icons just for this software? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 19:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041932.n44JWsWX029844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #3 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-04 15:32:53 EDT --- There is no hurry, or? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 19:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041934.n44JYd9N030321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-04 15:34:38 EDT --- but, i thank you for this very fast review. I'm very busy right now with other projects and so. This is in my personal schedule a not important thing. Perhaps i will find time to look in it tommorow morning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 19:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 15:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905041955.n44JtoHH003165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-04 15:55:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > There is no hurry, or? (In reply to comment #4) > but, i thank you for this very fast review. I'm very busy right now with other > projects and so. This is in my personal schedule a not important thing. Perhaps > i will find time to look in it tommorow morning. No, no hurry; I was just wondering if you had forgot (happens to me every now and then). Take your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042029.n44KTI3v009743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-04 16:29:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gst-mixer Short Description: legacy mixer for GNOME Owners: adamwill Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042036.n44KaSFx011569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:36:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499023] New: Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499023 Summary: Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: imak at endosys.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://repos.endosys.com/rhel5/SPECS/keepalived.spec SRPM URL: http://repos.endosys.com/rhel5/SRPMS/firewalling/keepalived-1.1.17-5.src.rpm Description: The main goal of the keepalived project is to add a strong & robust keepalive facility to the Linux Virtual Server project. This project is written in C with multilayer TCP/IP stack checks. Keepalived implements a framework based on three family checks : Layer3, Layer4 & Layer5/7. This framework gives the daemon the ability to check the state of an LVS server pool. When one of the servers of the LVS server pool is down, keepalived informs the linux kernel via a setsockopt call to remove this server entry from the LVS topology. In addition keepalived implements an independent VRRPv2 stack to handle director failover. So in short keepalived is a userspace daemon for LVS cluster nodes healthchecks and LVS directors failover. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042038.n44KcVNn010939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:38:30 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042040.n44KeGMo012592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:40:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042039.n44KdJ3A012110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:39:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498839] Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042042.n44Kgawj012058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:42:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042043.n44KhgLH012202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:43:40 EDT --- cvs done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042046.n44KkAuq013166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #8 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-04 16:46:09 EDT --- What is the next step ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042047.n44KlKGE013364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:47:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042049.n44Kn2LJ014438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:49:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042051.n44KpcEX015129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:51:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042049.n44Knsou013819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:49:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042053.n44KrQxS015498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:53:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042052.n44KqT6p015321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-04 16:52:28 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 20:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 16:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499023] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042055.n44Ktw2w015606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499023 --- Comment #1 from Ivan Makfinsky 2009-05-04 16:55:57 EDT --- I forgot to mention that this is my first package to Fedora and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042106.n44L67VI017769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #16 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-04 17:06:04 EDT --- last review of package looks ok from my point of view builded in koji for f10/f11 F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335826 F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335835 Arthur, you could probably put here links to review which you have done or on which you are working, or another packages which you have submitted. I see that you work on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759, you could do informal review for any other package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042113.n44LDTGm019102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 17:13:28 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042114.n44LEH8q020008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 17:14:16 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042115.n44LF2a7019673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 17:15:02 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042119.n44LJKGw021126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499036 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042122.n44LMf9F022064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 17:22:40 EDT --- perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042122.n44LMX3u022000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 17:22:32 EDT --- perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:22:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042122.n44LMbWM022033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 17:22:36 EDT --- perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:35:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:35:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498136] Review Request: gst-mixer - advanced mixer for GNOME (old gnome-volume-control) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042135.n44LZboR023665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498136 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-04 17:35:35 EDT --- ok, review is complete, rawhide build is done. thanks very much, kevin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042147.n44LldlT026414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Bug 495412 depends on bug 498790, which changed state. Bug 498790 Summary: Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042147.n44LleUW026444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Bug 495949 depends on bug 498790, which changed state. Bug 498790 Summary: Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042147.n44Llf9c026477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 498790, which changed state. Bug 498790 Summary: Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 21:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042147.n44Llc7L026389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-04 17:47:36 EDT --- builds ok for F-9,F-10,F-11,EPEL-4,EPEL-5 close and wait for updates approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 22:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042232.n44MWXba001682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 18:32:31 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.20.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 22:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042232.n44MWeNM002487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 18:32:38 EDT --- soci-3.0.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soci-3.0.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 22:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042233.n44MXfHH002603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 18:33:40 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.20.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 22:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498838] Review Request: perl-Any-Moose - Use Moose or Mouse automagically In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042243.n44MhTkE004508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498838 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 18:43:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 22:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 18:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498703] Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042243.n44MhXCg004555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-04 18:43:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488100] Review Request: firebird - Firebird SQL database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042316.n44NGZrc010141@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488100 --- Comment #88 from MERCIER 2009-05-04 19:16:31 EDT --- sorry for the wait ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042318.n44NId2B008868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #10 from MERCIER 2009-05-04 19:18:37 EDT --- thanks makowski for this work thanks Peter Lemenkov for this review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042329.n44NTRtJ010827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:29:26 EDT --- perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042328.n44NSgx9010621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:28:41 EDT --- perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042328.n44NSlDj010655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:28:46 EDT --- perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042329.n44NTWau012025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:29:31 EDT --- perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042331.n44NVFSs012609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:31:15 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042332.n44NW2NV011630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:32:01 EDT --- perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042332.n44NW6R3011662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:32:06 EDT --- perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042330.n44NUFIj011315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:30:14 EDT --- perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042331.n44NVBFY011547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:31:10 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042330.n44NUKpk011353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:30:19 EDT --- perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042332.n44NWxPi012863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:32:59 EDT --- perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042332.n44NWtxZ012832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-04 19:32:54 EDT --- perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042335.n44NZ1Z9013020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 19:35:00 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042334.n44NYvAv012971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 19:34:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:35:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:35:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042335.n44NZA17013352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 19:35:09 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:35:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:35:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042335.n44NZ69F013316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 19:35:05 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042335.n44NZDIE012216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 19:35:13 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905042335.n44NZHOe012255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-04 19:35:16 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] New: Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 Summary: Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ExpatImpl/ExpatImpl-devel.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/ExpatImpl/ExpatImpl-devel-1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: A C++ wrapper for the expat XML parsing library I need this package for another package I wish to submit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 4 23:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 19:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] New: Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Summary: Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Daemon-Generic/perl-Daemon-Generic.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Daemon-Generic/perl-Daemon-Generic-0.51-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Daemon::Generic provides a framework for starting, stopping, reconfiguring daemon-like programs. The framework provides for standard commands that work for as init.d files and as apachectl-like commands. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 00:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050000.n45005Xv017475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 Kamin Horvath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mohaas05 at gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Kamin Horvath 2009-05-04 20:00:03 EDT --- Hello, I was the member that took on the request. But I too thought it was only the logo. Since I cannot complete all of them, I have removed myself from the queue. My apologies for any inconvenience caused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 00:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 20:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050015.n450FPfK019739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #16 from Eric Moret 2009-05-04 20:15:24 EDT --- Rather than waiting for a hypothetical resource replacement, could we move forward with the approval process at RPM Fusion? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 01:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050105.n4515X43027170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Bug 489233 depends on bug 499003, which changed state. Bug 499003 Summary: Rebuild in devel needed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499003 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 01:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050127.n451RGPU029904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 Michael Stahnke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mastahnke at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Michael Stahnke 2009-05-04 21:27:15 EDT --- I agree with Prad's comments on Python locations. You really wouldn't reuse this code, so it belongs in /usr/share as an application not a development tool. Builds in mock for EL5. I am currently unable to check rawhide due current technical difficulties on my side :) I am in favor of changing the name of the log file and logrotate file. I realize legacy systems are using up2date for the log name, but since that tool has been phased out, I think the naming of the log file should be also; however this is a package review, and not a developer/design review.... The package looks good to me, but I'd like Nigel to look at it once more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 01:53:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 21:53:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050153.n451r5s4001889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 03:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets Alias: perl-Text-Context https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Context/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Context.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Given a piece of text and some search terms, produces an object which locates the search terms in the message, extracts a reasonable-length string containing all the search terms, and optionally dumps the string out as HTML text with the search terms highlighted in bold. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336215 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 03:45:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Eksblowfish/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: An object of this type encapsulates a keyed instance of the Eksblowfish block cipher, ready to encrypt and decrypt. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336219 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 03:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050357.n453vD3i023890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 03:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050357.n453vBR4023311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 03:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 23:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050358.n453wuog024095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #45 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-04 23:58:51 EDT --- I tested the scratch build on f11 with f12 ghc and it works fine for me. I will attach a patch for the suggestions above after this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050401.n4541YkY024189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050401.n4541XdW024168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:01:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:01:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050401.n4541MJj024131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050401.n4541JRl024105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-05 00:01:18 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336215 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPLv2+); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): bde066973828c37f9ede432c20dff268b7c284c5 Text-Context-3.6.tar.gz bde066973828c37f9ede432c20dff268b7c284c5 Text-Context-3.6.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Text::Context) = 3.6 perl-Text-Context = 3.6-1.fc12 perl(Text::Context::Para) ====> requires for perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(constant) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(Text::Context::EitherSide) perl(UNIVERSAL::require) perl(warnings) =====> perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) perl(Text::Context::EitherSide) >= 1.1 perl(UNIVERSAL::require) >= 0.03 APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050400.n4540mJS023942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #46 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 00:00:45 EDT --- Here is my formal review. +:ok, !:needs attention, -:needs fixing, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [!] MUST: rpmlint output Please fix the tabs that appeared spec file for the patch. Also fixed in my next patch. [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. Follows Haskell Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release 03a8f0a420902d9eea3df1d8d62598c7 xmonad-0.8.1.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [NA] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [NA] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050403.n4543Hcb024930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 00:03:16 EDT --- aah! you too are too quick to review perl packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050407.n4547m91025244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Matthew Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt at bravenet.com --- Comment #27 from Matthew Kent 2009-05-05 00:07:44 EDT --- Looking at the 2.2.2 release it looks like they've gone to to the MIT license and carry attribution for the functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050411.n454BlFm026466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 --- Comment #24 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 00:11:46 EDT --- can we close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050411.n454BYst026426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 00:11:33 EDT --- can we close this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050408.n4548l2V025843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-05 00:08:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > > > - Stuff under contrib/ seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+, but nothing seems to > > > be packaged from there. > > > > > > > the libraries that are built in contrib/ are lumped into libapbs.so* (along > > with some of the BSD licensed functions) - I've made note of the dual license, > > is it sufficient/OK to annotate the .so files as "BSD and LGPLv2+" in the > > %files section and add a PACKAGE-LICENSING file? > > Damn. Then the current packaging is a no-go: you must strip apbs of the contrib > packages and package them separately. > > At least maloc and pmg have upstreams here: http://fetk.org/ > Argh - OK, I'll talk with upstream, who I believe may be able to correct this. > Btw, you're maintaining PyMOL, right? Yes. > Does it include an own copy of apbs? No - thus the reason for this package. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050410.n454A5uh025855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050409.n4549WNI025465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #47 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 00:09:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342410) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342410) xmonad-final.patch I suggest making these small changes before importing to cvs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050411.n454BHDh026114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050411.n454BF52026088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-05 00:11:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Context Short Description: Handle highlighting search result context snippets Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050414.n454E0bp026699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 00:13:58 EDT --- can you request cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050415.n454FBq7027122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482963] Review Request: perl-Network-IPv4Addr - Network-IPv4Addr Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050412.n454CURW026588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482963 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:15:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:15:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] New: Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Summary: Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: These are macros taken from the GHC package and spun off into a seperate source package. The reasons are so we can update macros with a much much much shorter build time, rather than waiting hours for GHC to rebuild. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050418.n454IeM4027572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050426.n454QjCt028997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 00:26:44 EDT --- koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336251 DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for perl(File::Flock) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050427.n454Ra4t028585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #6 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-05 00:27:35 EDT --- requested -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488175] Package Review: ibus-table-extraphrase In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050428.n454SWFa028672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488175 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #25 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-05 00:28:31 EDT --- built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=99243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050439.n454droh030293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #1 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-05 00:39:53 EDT --- Re: comments from Jens on IRC: Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm This moves copying the license file over from the %build section to the %prep section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050455.n454tbH7000984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 04:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 00:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050455.n454tZ0Z000373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-05 00:55:34 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336219 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): d91b9fac79a33eb11b19df7147f8daaef2297e67 Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007.tar.gz d91b9fac79a33eb11b19df7147f8daaef2297e67 Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.ppc.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.ppc.rpm perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish) = 0.007 perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish = 0.007-1.fc12 perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Bcrypt) = 0.007 perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Blowfish) = 0.007 perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Family) = 0.007 perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish(ppc-32) = 0.007-1.fc12 perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Subkeyed) = 0.007 perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Uklblowfish) = 0.007 ====> requires for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.ppc.rpm libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Mix) >= 0.001 perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish) >= 0.005 perl(MIME::Base64) >= 2.21 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) perl(XSLoader) rtld(GNU_HASH) =====> perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(Class::Mix) >= 0.001 perl(ExtUtils::CBuilder) >= 0.15 perl(Module::Build) perl(parent) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-debuginfo-0.007-1.fc12.ppc.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-debuginfo-0.007-1.fc12.ppc.rpm perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-debuginfo = 0.007-1.fc12 perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-debuginfo(ppc-32) = 0.007-1.fc12 ====> requires for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-debuginfo-0.007-1.fc12.ppc.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 05:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:23:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050523.n455NM6a005146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-05 01:23:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish Short Description: Eksblowfish block cipher Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 05:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050525.n455PFNs006332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 05:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050523.n455NORx005838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 05:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 01:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050556.n455uN5q010459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 01:56:22 EDT --- The License should be GPLv2+ at least or maybe even GPLv3. Not sure if ghc-rpm-macros should not require ghc - macros.ghc is not really useful without it. On the other hand any package that uses the macros will also need to BR ghc I guess anyway, but still it does not seem unreasonable to require ghc in my opinion. Otherwise looks fine to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 06:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 02:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050640.n456exUm018305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-05 02:40:57 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-credential Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 06:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 02:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050653.n456rdiP020457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Bug 497283 depends on bug 498977, which changed state. Bug 498977 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-05 02:53:38 EDT --- http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04-4.fc11.src.rpm BR added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:07:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:07:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050707.n4577mPf023038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] New: Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext Alias: perl-Locale-PO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Locale-PO/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Locale-PO.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module simplifies management of GNU gettext .po files and is an alternative to using emacs po-mode. It provides an object-oriented interface in which each entry in a .po file is a Locale::PO object. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336384 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050724.n457OqM2025650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498390] Review Request: rakudo - Rakudo - A Perl compiler for Parrot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050729.n457TtQ2026513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498390 Gerd Pokorra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(gp at zimt.uni-siege | |n.de) | --- Comment #2 from Gerd Pokorra 2009-05-05 03:29:54 EDT --- There is no timeframe, because nobody know how long it will take that the basis arrives (rakudo builds on an installed parrot). I also can not say how long the review will be. By be making some tests with an include parrot in the meantime. (So it will start when rakudo builds on an installed parrot and end when it is done. But then it think, it will be updated the next ten years a lot of times.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050735.n457Z1MG027383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-05 03:34:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Dank je wel, Hans. > > All issues should be addressed now, both MUST and SHOULD. > > Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/grfcodec.spec > SRPM URL: > http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc12.src.rpm > > Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1334072 All looks good now: approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498839] Review Request: hunspell-so - Somali spelling dictionary In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050735.n457ZJ7a026569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498839 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-WikiConverter/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-WikiConverter.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: HTML::WikiConverter is an HTML to wiki converter. It can convert HTML source into a variety of wiki markups, called wiki "dialects". This package contains the perl modules; install the "html2wiki" package for the application itself. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336414 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050741.n457fu1i027728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-05 03:41:54 EDT --- There's still rpmlint message perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/auto/JavaScript/Minifier/XS/XS.so Could it be removed, or could I ignore it? http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050744.n457iPnt029174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050744.n457iNhX029130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-05 03:44:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grfcodec Short Description: A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050743.n457hJI7028976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-05 03:43:16 EDT --- Heh, missing Request form! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:45:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:45:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050745.n457jh4c029783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 03:45:33 EDT --- The spec file is not available. Also, this package should be named expatimpl (with a -devel subpackage that contains the headers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050747.n457lcVM028667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-05 03:47:36 EDT --- The position of dos2unix is arguable. In different review I was told to use it in prep because it prepare the source :) Thank you for your review. I own you some. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050748.n457mmoY028810@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-05 03:48:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Acme-PlayCode Short Description: Perl module for enhancement of code Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050758.n457w3XJ030560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-05 03:58:02 EDT --- ugene-1.4.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ugene-1.4.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050756.n457uD5G030365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-05 03:56:11 EDT --- ugene-1.4.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ugene-1.4.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 07:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 03:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050759.n457xU7L030867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499098 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050806.n4586aho001523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-05 04:06:35 EDT --- >From some strange reason it doesn't build for this BR with number of release. perl(YAML::XS) 0.32 is in mock, see the new build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336436 http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050818.n458ICni003648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #14 from David Sugar 2009-05-05 04:18:10 EDT --- I have removed static libs and I think resolved all other issues here, other than the zero length files doxygen generates over there. I do not get those when I build ucommon on my box with rpmlint ucommon-doc-2.0.5-4.i386.rpm so I am unsure of that issue and it seems entirely related to how doxygen works. rpm -qlp only shows me there are a lot of _cgraph.map files produced by it :). If I were to take a guess, maybe it did not like some specific doxygenated header entry and created an empty callgraph for it. Hence, it is a bug to be found and resolved in the source distribution, but certainly not a critical one. I also recall I long ago added %debug_package %{nil} %_unpackaged_files_terminate_build 0 %_missing_doc_files_terminate_build 0 To my own ~/.rpmmacros a long time ago. This kept me from seeing a few things locally :). I will work on sipwitch next (submitted under a new bug report) now that this seems to be getting finalized. Updated Files: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon.spec http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/ucommon-2.0.5-4.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050824.n458O6ZZ003708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #41 from Alex Lancaster 2009-05-05 04:24:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > (In reply to comment #38) > > can you investigate 1) the shared-lib-calls-exit warning and if we can ignore, > > please justify and 2) the binaryinfo-readelf-failed for the -static subpackage > > 1) Shared-lib-calls-exit means that somewhere in the library a piece of code > calls exit(). This is a poor practice for a library but it's not our fault and > we can ignore it. OK. > 2) I don't know why this happens, it should be resolved before this is > approved. Ping? I think this is the last issue remaining before approval. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module adds typical XPath methods to HTML::TreeBuilder, to make it easy to query a document. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336455 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050824.n458O6el004713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 04:24:03 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336384 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2cb9a5f472e944685c43588e18f24fcb6101de47 Locale-PO-0.21.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=30, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.15 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.19 CPU) + Package perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Locale::PO) = 0.21 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050829.n458TIr5004929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499050 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:28:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050828.n458SN72004814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050829.n458THPT004908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499103 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-05-05 04:29:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > DEBUG util.py:256: No Package Found for perl(File::Flock) I have no idea how mock was able to build this package without perl-File-Flock being available. That review is bug #499103. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] New: Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-File-Flock/perl-File-Flock.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-File-Flock/perl-File-Flock-2008.01-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lock files using the flock() call. If the file to be locked does not exist, then the file is created. If the file was created then it will be removed when it is unlocked assuming it's still an empty file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050831.n458VAdu006263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050828.n458SZo0005616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050831.n458V8F5005631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-05 04:31:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Locale-PO Short Description: Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490269] Review Request: xfglenses - Gravitational lenses visualization program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050832.n458WfgV006496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490269 --- Comment #12 from Thibault North 2009-05-05 04:32:40 EDT --- pong. I'm quite busy these days and for the next few month (bachelor's thesis) so I won't be able to touch this package :-( btw, if anyone would like to fix it, just feel free to do it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050834.n458YJRx006697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-05 04:34:18 EDT --- Okay, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499023] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050844.n458ibSj007869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499023 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050850.n458o8jR009128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 04:50:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336455 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 874ec136493bb15765fd64f77f4f92e6a139f6b9 HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=81, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.02 sys + 0.95 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.12 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath) = 0.10 perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath::Attribute) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath::Node) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath::Root) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder::XPath::TextNode) Requires: perl(List::Util) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(XML::XPathEngine) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050850.n458o6cJ009094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 04:50:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336414 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 34cb8ab7f5375aa7836325f9388d6ffe63c475eb HTML-WikiConverter-0.68.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=71, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.07 usr 0.01 sys + 1.07 cusr 0.08 csys = 1.23 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::WikiConverter) = 0.68 perl(HTML::WikiConverter::Normalizer) perl(HTML::WikiConverter::WebApp) Requires: perl(CSS) perl(Carp) perl(DirHandle) perl(Encode) perl(File::Spec) perl(HTML::Element) perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::Tagset) perl(HTML::TreeBuilder) perl(HTML::WikiConverter) perl(HTML::WikiConverter::Normalizer) perl(Params::Validate) perl(Tie::IxHash) perl(URI) perl(URI::Escape) perl(XML::Writer) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 08:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 04:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050859.n458xhjQ011146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 --- Comment #17 from Andrea Musuruane 2009-05-05 04:59:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Hello, > > I was the member that took on the request. But I too thought it was only the > logo. Since I cannot complete all of them, I have removed myself from the > queue. My apologies for any inconvenience caused. I suggest to create a new logo and to reuse the icons from some icon set we already use. Maybe the default icon set thus the look would be the same. Bye, Andrea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050901.n4591Prs011701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-05 05:01:24 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1336511 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ff3dcdb9426afc18867c8bfc615e25d325947ac7 File-Flock-2008.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=199, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.09 csys = 0.22 CPU) + Package perl-File-Flock-2008.01-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(File::Flock) = 2008.01 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(Fcntl) perl(IO::File) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050906.n4596VSJ012719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-05 05:06:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-WikiConverter Short Description: Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:06:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050906.n4596YMn011951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050906.n4596e6O012007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050906.n4596bFi011980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-05 05:06:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath Short Description: Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:18:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:18:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050918.n459IHrj013906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |felix at fetzig.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |felix at fetzig.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-05 05:18:16 EDT --- You probably forgot "-f %{name}.lang" after the %files macro. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 09:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 05:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905050919.n459Jl7l014124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-05-05 05:19:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-Flock Short Description: File locking with flock Owners: eseyman Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 10:20:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 06:20:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] New: Review Request: Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Summary: Review Request: Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/glista.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/glista-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Glista aims to be a very simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool that does what it's supposed to, and does not get in your way. The main focus of Glista is on staying a very simple tool. Glista is based on the Gtk+ graphical toolkit, which means it will integrate best with the GNOME desktop and other Gtk+ based desktop environments, but will also run well on other environments such as KDE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 10:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 06:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481527] Review Request: bucardo - asynchronous PostgreSQL replication system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051019.n45AJZwT024744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481527 Bug 481527 depends on bug 481528, which changed state. Bug 481528 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 10:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 06:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481528] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Safe - Safer access to your database through a DBI database handle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051019.n45AJYt9024720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481528 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 10:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 06:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051021.n45ALIXc025320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Simple |Review Request: glista - |personal to-do list manager |Simple personal to-do list |or task tracking tool - |manager or task tracking | |tool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 10:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 06:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051039.n45AdjdT028627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #42 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-05 06:39:41 EDT --- Only for the following "issue" (as I found this comment by chance): (In reply to comment #41) > (In reply to comment #40) > > (In reply to comment #38) > > 2) I don't know why this happens, it should be resolved before this is > > approved. > > Ping? I think this is the last issue remaining before approval. >From rpmlint, binaryinfo-readelf-failed message actually means that (please check /usr/share/rpmlint/BinariesCheck.py ) $ readelf -W -S -l -d -s libjcntl.a >/dev/null ; echo $? readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start readelf: Error: ../libjcntl.a(smatrix_elim_n.o): Failed to read file header readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start readelf: Error: ../libjcntl.a(realroots_n.o): Failed to read file header 1 (Note that this result is for -static package rebuilt by koji scratch build) Then when checking libjcnl.a, it shows: $ ar x ../libjcntl.a $ ls -al smatrix_elim_n.o realroots_n.o -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 0 2009-05-05 19:30 realroots_n.o -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 tasaka1 0 2009-05-05 19:30 smatrix_elim_n.o i.e. these files are empty. Strangely, when I try mockbuild on my local machine, rpmlint warns nothing for -static package and actually $ ls -al smatrix_elim_n.o realroots_n.o -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 mock 52724 2009-05-05 19:22 realroots_n.o -rw-r--r-- 1 tasaka1 mock 92368 2009-05-05 19:22 smatrix_elim_n.o All other files in libjcntl.a (rebuilt on my local machine) have the same sizes as those in libjcntl.a rebuilt by koji scratch build. So I am not sure why these 2 files are empty when rebuilt on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 10:50:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 06:50:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] New: Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Summary: Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gnome-applet-alarm-clock.spec Description: Alarm Clock is a fully-featured alarm clock for your GNOME panel. It's easy to use yet powerful with support for multiple repeatable alarms, as well as snoozing and a flexible notification system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051116.n45BGItk004854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 David Sugar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499137 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051116.n45BGGg0004812@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 David Sugar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR), | |498736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] New: Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Summary: Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dyfet at gnutelephony.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-0.src.rpm Description: GNU SIP Witch is a pure SIP-based office telephone call server that supports generic phone system features like call forwarding, hunt groups and call distribution, call coverage and ring groups, holding, and call transfer, as well as offering SIP specific capabilities such as presence and messaging. It supports secure telephone extensions for making calls over the Internet, and intercept/decrypt-free peer-to-peer audio and video extensions. It is not a SIP proxy, a multi-protocol telephone server, or an IP-PBX, and does not try to emulate Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, or Yate. WARNING: This is a rather complex package, it includes plugins, python and php swig. Many different things and packaging issues are found within! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051130.n45BUlgZ007561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #43 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-05 07:30:46 EDT --- Ah, killing parallel make seems to work... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051138.n45Bcx23008844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|498736 | Depends on| |498736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051138.n45BcwqN008788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499137 Depends on|499137 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 11:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 07:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051152.n45BqIxL010215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 12:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051221.n45CL4Bi016058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 08:21:04 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - Remove commented Requires: line. - %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT are mixed, which is not allowed. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 12:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051234.n45CYnVu020285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #28 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-05 08:34:46 EDT --- When I see a 2.2.2 SRPM, I'll audit it to make sure everything looks okay from a licensing perspective. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 12:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051248.n45CmQaf021980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-05 08:48:25 EDT --- All fixed: * Tue May 05 2009 Christoph Wickert - 0.4-2 - Add autostart for GNOME - Fix macros http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/glista.spec http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/glista-0.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 13:06:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:06:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051306.n45D6w4p028482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 09:06:57 EDT --- Okay, looks good, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 13:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051306.n45D6fih028446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 13:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051315.n45DFsNP029381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-05 09:15:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: glista Short Description: Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 14:07:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:07:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499169] New: Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499169 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-cv.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-cv-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Chuvash hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 14:25:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:25:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051425.n45EPoFc018905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 Tomas Hoger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thoger at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-05 10:25:47 EDT --- You may want to have a look at Debian bug: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526788 I have not checked if this may affect Fedora packages, probably worth checking before this enters repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 14:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051438.n45EcTD5018872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #29 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-05-05 10:38:27 EDT --- New SPEC: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/SPECS/rubygem-passenger.spec New SRPM: http://www.kanarip.com/custom/f11/SRPMS/rubygem-passenger-2.2.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 14:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 10:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051457.n45EvZEn023585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #30 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-05 10:57:33 EDT --- The source looks clean of licensing issues. You should really use: License: MIT and CNRI Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 15:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499169] Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051500.n45F0AUV027647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499169 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 15:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051515.n45FFrIT028117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-05 11:15:52 EDT --- * Would be fine to name it "ExpatImpl" with no main package but a -devel subpackage. There are no guidelines that require the name to be converted to lower-case. * Licensing situation is unclear. Upstream .zip doesn't contain or mention the BSD licence that is specified in the .spec file. There's just a copyright notice in the single C++ header file. In the upstream msg boards the authors writes: | By definition, all code posted to CodeProject is free to use. | These days I use the BSD non-adware license. | So feel free to use the code as you wish. | | [...] | | Tim Smith "Free to use" doesn't imply "BSD". Though, if you choose the BSD licence for the Fedora package, an added explanation would be good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 15:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051522.n45FMK2g001229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #1 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-05 11:22:19 EDT --- Since Fedora 11 one can require an arch-specific pkgconfig with: %if 0%{?fedora} > 10 Requires: pkgconfig%{_isa} %else Requires: pkgconfig %endif This is more accurate on multi-arch platforms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 15:30:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:30:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051530.n45FUheN003849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 11:30:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > * Would be fine to name it "ExpatImpl" with no main package but a -devel > subpackage. There are no guidelines that require the name to be converted to > lower-case. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity although in this case the name of the tarball is ExpatImpl and thus ExpatImpl is OK to use as the package name. To the first point: doesn't this package include a library of some sort? > * Licensing situation is unclear. Upstream .zip doesn't contain or mention the > BSD licence that is specified in the .spec file. There's just a copyright > notice in the single C++ header file. In the upstream msg boards the authors > writes: > > | By definition, all code posted to CodeProject is free to use. > | These days I use the BSD non-adware license. > | So feel free to use the code as you wish. > | > | [...] > | > | Tim Smith > > "Free to use" doesn't imply "BSD". > > Though, if you choose the BSD licence for the Fedora package, an added > explanation would be good. "Free to use" doesn't imply distributability either. Unless upstream puts a clear license in the tarball (or state that the code is public domain), there's no way this package will be included in Fedora. A message board message is not enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 16:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] New: Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Summary: Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gcolor2.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: gcolor2 is a simple color selector that was originally based on gcolor, ported to use GTK+2, and now has a completely new UI. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 16:09:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:09:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428368] Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051609.n45G9u7l013360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 --- Comment #13 from Orion Poplawski 2009-05-05 12:09:54 EDT --- I'd like to see, and would be willing to maintain, EL-5 branches for fedora-ds and company in EPEL. Thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 16:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 12:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051659.n45GxAtq024831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #8 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-05 12:59:08 EDT --- Package Name: ibus-table-yong Short Description: Yong table data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: devel InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 17:01:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:01:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051701.n45H1lqg025633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 --- Comment #4 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-05 13:01:46 EDT --- > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity As I wrote before, the guidelines do not require the package to get a lower-case name. The "ExpatImpl" spelling is used also throughout the C++ header file, in the header filename, and in the wrapper class name. And btw, the Expat project refers to itself as "Expat". ;) > "Free to use" doesn't imply distributability either. Let me repeat from my previous comment: Licensing situation is unclear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 17:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051740.n45HeacU007961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #12 from Zach Carter 2009-05-05 13:40:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > You may want to have a look at Debian bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526788 > > I have not checked if this may affect Fedora packages, probably worth checking > before this enters repositories. Thanks for the heads up. Here is an update that includes the patch: http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot.spec http://www.zachcarter.com/rpms/schroot-1.2.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 17:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 13:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051744.n45Hi6Kh008464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-05 13:44:05 EDT --- Good: + Package name fits naming guidelines. + Basename of the SPEC files fits with package name. + Could open URL in URL tag + Could download source files with spectool -g + Source file matches with upstream version (md5sum: b47eaa6ae4231a42f4a15564a08eb439) + Consistently usage of rpm macros. + Package contains valid License tag + License tag contains 'Public Domain' as a valid OSS license + License fits with copyright note in source file + Package contains no verbatin license text (IMHO this is not required for Public Domain) + Package contains no subpackages + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quite for source package + Rpmlint is quite for binary package + Files has proper files permissions + Files stanza contains no duplicates + Local install and uninstall works fine. + Scratch build on koji works fine. + Package contains proper %changelog Bad: - Why do you don't but the generated readme.txt file no into the %doc stanza? - Local test fais. I have try to copy a mbox file form /var/spool/mail into a directroy and then call mb2md -s . I have got the following message: mb2md.pl -s s4504kr Fatal: Source is not an mbox file or a directory! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051822.n45IMIf8016465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 14:22:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Bad: > - Why do you don't but the generated readme.txt file no into > the %doc stanza? Fixed, thanks for catching. > - Local test fais. > I have try to copy a mbox file form /var/spool/mail into a > directroy and then call mb2md -s . I have got the following > message: mb2md.pl -s s4504kr > Fatal: Source is not an mbox file or a directory! Uhh, I just tested it with a mailbox both with $ mb2md -m $ mb2md -s mbox and both also with a destination directory argument, all of them worked like a charm. Are you sure the file you tried was a mailbox format file? http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mb2md.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mb2md-3.20-3.fc10.src.rpm PS. If you're reviewing this, please put your email address in the "Assigned to" field and set the fedora-review flag to "?". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051828.n45ISeID018329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-05 14:28:38 EDT --- ell, for 2.2.2-1: * %define -> %global - Please use %global instead of %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define * Gem guidelines - First of all, this does not follow RubyGem packaging guidelines A This srpm is not created from original gem file B And actually the binary "rubygem-passenger" rpm does not work as gem. For example, "$ gem list passenger returns nothing. This is because specification .gemspec file is missing. Also, cached gem file is not installed. Well, for A: - When using gem as source, applying patches may be difficult. However if you want gem file can be expanded as tar archive. Also, usually I guess rake file supports "rake gem" to create modified gem file The issue B is more critical than A. * Functionality - Note that some of (maybe all) scripts under %_bindir don't work. For example: ---------------------------------------------------------------- $ passenger-config --version /usr/bin/passenger-config:27:in `require': no such file to load -- phusion_passenger/constants (LoadError) from /usr/bin/passenger-config:27 ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Issues from build.log ---------------------------------------------------------------- 92 mkdir -p ext/nginx/libboost_oxt/boost 93 g++ -Iext -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include -Wall -g -DPASSENGER_DEBUG -DBOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS -o ext/nginx/libboost_oxt/boost/exceptions.o -c ext/boost/src/pthread/exceptions.cpp 94 g++ -Iext -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include -Wall -g -DPASSENGER_DEBUG -DBOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS -o ext/nginx/libboost_oxt/boost/once.o -c ext/boost/src/pthread/once.cpp ---------------------------------------------------------------- - This still uses internal boost library. Please try to use system-wide boost library. Note that F-11/12 boost is 1.37. And: ---------------------------------------------------------------- 106 g++ -Iext -Iext/common -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include -Wall -g -DPASSENGER_DEBUG -DBOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS -o ext/nginx/libpassenger_common/Utils.o -c ext/common/Utils.cpp 107 g++ -Iext -Iext/common -D_REENTRANT -I/usr/local/include -Wall -g -DPASSENGER_DEBUG -DBOOST_DISABLE_ASSERTS -o ext/nginx/libpassenger_common/Logging.o -c ext/common/Logging.cpp ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. * Misc cleanups ! Note: Before fixing below, please change to use gem file as source first. ---------------------------------------------------------------- mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir}/lib/ext/ cp -a * %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir} ---------------------------------------------------------------- - The middle line is not needed. - What is the following line for? ---------------------------------------------------------------- cp -a ext/phusion_passenger/native_support.so %{buildroot}/%{geminstdir}/lib/ext/. ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Directory ownership issue - The following directories should be owned by main package, not by -devel subpackage: ---------------------------------------------------------------- %{geminstdir}/ext/ %{geminstdir}/ext/apache2/ %{geminstdir}/ext/boost/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- - The ownership of the following directories is unclear: ---------------------------------------------------------------- %{geminstdir}/test/ %{geminstdir}/test/support/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051831.n45IVQIi018085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-05-05 14:31:25 EDT --- Adding it was what gave me an error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051830.n45IUukE019037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051835.n45IZMLK019087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #11 from Benjamin Kosnik 2009-05-05 14:35:21 EDT --- Ping. Can this get merged into the gcc-4.4.0 rpms on the next respin please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051835.n45IZ9SQ018810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-05 14:35:08 EDT --- Can you explain me the following behaviour? $ mb2md.pl -s s4504kr Fatal: Source is not an mbox file or a directory! [s4504kr at zeus mbtest]$ mv s4504kr mbox [s4504kr at zeus mbtest]$ mb2md.pl -s mbox Converting /home/s4504kr/mbox to maildir: /home/s4504kr/Maildir Source Mbox is /home/s4504kr/mbox Target Maildir is /home/s4504kr/Maildir 2 messages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051855.n45It7kk023480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 14:55:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > - From Fedora 9 onwards there is no more tetex in Fedora, the latex interpreter > > is texlive instead. > tetex-latex is still provided by texlive-latex package That's odd; it shouldn't do that since texlive is not tetex. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 18:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051852.n45Iqvfj022982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 19:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051917.n45JHASn027433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-05 15:17:09 EDT --- Ok, I have a closer look and find out, that my complaints may be rise by a lack of understanding your application. So I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 19:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051920.n45JKUxO028331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 15:20:29 EDT --- - You can get the package to build shared libraries very easily: add the line sed -i "s|LIBRARY_TYPE = staticlib||g" src/klfbackend/klfbackend.pro after the setup phase. Remember to add Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to the devel package and remove the Provides: %{name}-static line. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - License is GPLv2+ not GPLv2. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Since devel package doesn't require (and consisting only of a static library doesn't need to either) the main package, add AUTHORS and COPYING to %doc of devel package too. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - There are no shared libraries in the main package that would be needed for development. MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 19:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051926.n45JQC11029859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 15:26:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mb2md Short Description: Mailbox to maildir converter Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 19:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051951.n45JpnIp002464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-05 15:51:48 EDT --- Unfortunately, I have forgotten to complaints, that your package should have a Requires: perl line. It will be nice, if you can add this line in your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 19:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905051959.n45JxEMQ003972@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #19 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-05-05 15:59:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Understood (however, I still don't like this silly solution). In future we will probably remove the batch scripts anyway and use something more sensible. > * Ok, it builds fine in Koji for F-11: > >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335580 > Unfortunately, it failed to build in EL-5: > >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1335591 > If you decided to add EPEl branch for rabbitmq, then this needs fixing. I will check that now. > * rpmling is not silent: > rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in > /etc/rc.d/init.d/rabbitmq-server > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 6 warnings. > [petro at Sulaco ~]$ > Apparently my version of rpmlint didn't catch this one. I will fix this. > BTW are you still searching for sponsor? I cannot find you in "sponsorship > queue". What's your Fedora account name? hubert Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 20:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 16:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052033.n45KX26A010950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-05 16:33:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Unfortunately, I have forgotten to complaints, that your package should have a > Requires: perl line. > > It will be nice, if you can add this line in your package. No need, it's automatically picked up by rpm: $ rpm -qpR mb2md-3.20-3.fc10.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/perl perl(Date::Parse) perl(Fcntl) perl(Getopt::Std) perl(IO::Handle) perl(strict) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052206.n45M6SZM030890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-05-05 18:06:27 EDT --- Hi Orcan, please apologize the delay of the review. Here it is: * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/creox.spec SRPMS/creox-0.2.2-0.1.rc2.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/creox-* creox.i386: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/creox/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - as Orcan said, this is a false warning, the target of the symlink is provided by kdelibs-common which is required by kdelibs3 which are required via library dependencies by creox (and so the installed package will not have dangling symlinks) * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name - non-numeric release handled according: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease * License: OK - GPLv2 acceptable - GPLv2 (as published) referenced in source files as well as in the COPYING file - COPYING file packaged * specfile in American English and legible: OK * Sources: OK - Source0 URL ok - spectool -g creox.spec works - sources matches upstream - md5sum: 11d87ad6d47274fdf3f3236f5e09d6fd * Patch0: TODO - it is recommended to send the patches upstream and add a short comment in the spec file about the status of the bug report * Compilation: TODO - mock build works - package builds correctly in koji for F12, F11 and F10 - auto* tools adds additionally "-O2" (via acinclude.m4) - this is not a problem right now, but probably if Fedora changes once its default optimization flags then the package would be compiled with "-O2 -O3" or something like this (I don't consider this as a big issue, but if it could be solved easily, then it should be fixed IMHO) * debuginfo sub-package: OK - non-empty - debuginfo file works together with gdb * BuildRequires: OK * Locales handling: OK - %find_lang used - gettext in BuildRequires * shared/static libs, pkgconfig/header/*.la files: OK (n/a) * packages must own all directories: TODO - in general OK - just a very minor suggestion: %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} should better be %{_datadir}/apps/%{name}/ (just to indicate that really a directory and not a file gets packaged) * files not listed twice: OK * permissions of files: OK - %defattr used - final file permissions OK * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * GUI application needs %{name}.desktop: OK - custom desktop file added - package appears correctly in (gnome) menu - icon tag OK * no directories owned which are already owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %{install}: OK * all filenames UTF8: OK * functional test: TODO - program starts and can be used - however, when I press "play", I get an message box "Error:" (the sound settings are not touched, all channels are set to "alsa_pcm:capture_1/2" or "alsa_pcm:playback_1/2" ) - I'm not sure whether there is any need to configure any jack-related settings in my system... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052213.n45MDb2J032244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-05 18:13:35 EDT --- ackage Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint gnome-applet-alarm-clock* gnome-applet-alarm-clock.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/alarm-clock.schemas 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is OK. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Upstream source: 61f30d38d8be50489c9e43ffc8b1ea4d alarm-clock-0.2.5.tar.gz Build source: 61f30d38d8be50489c9e43ffc8b1ea4d alarm-clock-0.2.5.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales. [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete. [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install. [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1337769 [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052220.n45MKRon001098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-05 18:20:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Optflags are not used. Use > make CFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} fixed > - What is the stuff the package installs in %{_datadir} that you remove? doc files > Once you've fixed these I'll review the package. Thanks Here are the updated files: Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wavemon.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/wavemon-0.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052234.n45MYwUP002139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-05 18:34:57 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-applet-alarm-clock Short Description: Alarm clock for the GNOME panel Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] New: Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-cddrive-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-cddrive-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin puts a button in the Xfce panel to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray. Additionally, the button icon reports the content of the drive. The icon indicates if there is a disc in the drive, if it is mounted, and the type of the disc (regular CD-ROM, audio, DVD...). You can also mount or unmount the disc via the plugin menu. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:46:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:46:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] New: Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-cellmodem-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The cellmodem plugin is a monitoring plugin for cellular modems. It reports provider and signal quality for GPRS/UMTS(3G)/HSDPA(3.5G) modem cards. It works with (mostly) all cards which support an out-of-band channel for monitoring purposes. Current features include: * Display the current network type (GPRS/UMTS) * Display the current signal level * Configure the maximum signal level * Configure the low and critical signal level * Asking for PIN if modem needs it * Quick visual feedback on modem and registration status via LEDs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052251.n45MpGCl005550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - |xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - | |Cell Modem monitor plugin | |for the Xfce panel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] New: Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-notifyd.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xfce4-notifyd is a simple, visually-appealing notification daemon for Xfce that implements the freedesktop.org desktop notifications specification. Features: * Themable using the GTK+ theming mechanism * Visually appealing: rounded corners, shaped windows * Supports transparency and fade effects -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] New: Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Summary: Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-radio-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Xfce panel plugin to control your V4l radio device. To run it, all you need is the Xfce panel and a properly configured V4l radio device. Left-click on the plugin?s icon to switch your radio on/off. Once turned on, the middle button will show you the station preset menu. The mouse wheel allows you to change frequency or station preset. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 22:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 18:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052257.n45Mvton007305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-05 18:57:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Orcan, > > please apologize the delay of the review. Here it is: > No problem! Thanks for the review. > > * Patch0: TODO > - it is recommended to send the patches upstream and add a short comment > in the spec file about the status of the bug report > I sent them the patch and the desktop file I'm using via email since they don't have a bugtracker. > * Compilation: TODO > - mock build works > - package builds correctly in koji for F12, F11 and F10 > - auto* tools adds additionally "-O2" (via acinclude.m4) - this is not a > problem right now, but probably if Fedora changes once its default optimization > flags then the package would be compiled with "-O2 -O3" or something like this > (I don't consider this as a big issue, but if it could be solved easily, then > it should be fixed IMHO) > -O2 comes before %optflags during compilation, and the last one wins. Hence it won't affect any effect even if our %optflags start using -O3. I can still change it but do you think it's worth? (I will need to BR autohell since I will have to change the timestamp of the m4 file) > > * packages must own all directories: TODO > - in general OK > - just a very minor suggestion: %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} should better be > %{_datadir}/apps/%{name}/ (just to indicate that really a directory and not a > file gets packaged) > Thanks for pointing this out. I usually do it the way you told but apparently I missed it this time. > > * functional test: TODO > - program starts and can be used > - however, when I press "play", I get an message box "Error:" (the sound > settings are not touched, all channels are set to "alsa_pcm:capture_1/2" or > "alsa_pcm:playback_1/2" ) - I'm not sure whether there is any need to > configure any jack-related settings in my system... You will need to have a running jackd before you use creox (many jack applications don't start jackd by themselves automatically). I recommend using qjackctl for starting/configuring jack and controlling jack ports. Also if you didn't do it already, check the file /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-*/README.Fedora for setting up your jack configuration before you start it up. It's worth it. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/creox.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.2.2-0.2.rc2 - Some specfile make-up - Sent Source1 and Patch0 upstream. Comment added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052301.n45N1cV0007262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-05 19:01:37 EDT --- soci-3.0.0-10.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soci-3.0.0-10.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052304.n45N4cR3007684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052323.n45NNGEg011302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #7 from nucleo 2009-05-05 19:23:15 EDT --- Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #6) > - You can get the package to build shared libraries very easily: add the line > sed -i "s|LIBRARY_TYPE = staticlib||g" src/klfbackend/klfbackend.pro > after the setup phase. Remember to add > Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > to the devel package and remove the Provides: %{name}-static line. I made libklfbackend subpackage with shared libraries and libklfbackend-devel with header packages. > rpmlint output is clean. $ rpmlint klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc12.i586.rpm klatexformula-debuginfo-3.0.1-3.fc12.i586.rpm libklfbackend-3.0.1-3.fc12.i586.rpm libklfbackend-devel-3.0.1-3.fc12.i586.rpm 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - License is GPLv2+ not GPLv2. License field fixed. > MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1337883 I made patch that fixes build with GCC 4.4 http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/klatexformula/klatexformula-gcc44.patch > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A There are ldconfig in libklfbackend package > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Since devel package doesn't require (and consisting only of a static library > doesn't need to either) the main package, add AUTHORS and COPYING to %doc of > devel package too. AUTHORS, README and COPYING now in libklfbackend package too, in libklfbackend-devel there is only README because it requires libklfbackend. > MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Header files now in libklfbackend-devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 5 23:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905052342.n45Ngh89014307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-05 19:42:43 EDT --- soci-3.0.0-10.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/soci-3.0.0-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 00:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 20:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060030.n460UVnH022450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #31 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-05 20:30:30 EDT --- For Fedora 10 and 11, it builds cleanly, as well as for rawhide on i586 and x86_64. However, on rawhide ppc/ppc64, there seems to be stability problems (e.g., problem with the build/libtool tool on that platform for that version): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1337938&name=build.log and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1337898&name=build.log . For EL-5, there seems to be an old issue (bug 227790) on having a noarch sub-package: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/2188-soci-3.0.0-12.el5/noarch/build.log : ---------------------------------------------------------------- Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/soci-3.0.0-12.el5-root-mockbuild error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_core.so.3.0.0.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_core.so.3.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_core.so.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_mysql.so.3.0.0.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_mysql.so.3.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_mysql.so.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_postgresql.so.3.0.0.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_postgresql.so.3.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_postgresql.so.debug RPM build errors: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_core.so.3.0.0.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_core.so.3.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_core.so.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_mysql.so.3.0.0.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_mysql.so.3.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_mysql.so.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_postgresql.so.3.0.0.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_postgresql.so.3.debug /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libsoci_postgresql.so.debug Child returncode was: 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- If you know of a work around, do not hesitate to tell me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 01:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 21:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] New: Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Summary: Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/zita-convolver.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: zita-convolver is a fast, partitioned convolution engine library. rpmlint: zita-convolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation There is no devel documentation in the tarball. Koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1337972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] New: Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Summary: Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jconv.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Jconv is a Convolution Engine for JACK, based on FFT convolution and using non-uniform partition sizes: small ones at the start of the IR and building up to the most efficient size further on. It can perform zero-delay processing with moderate CPU load. rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060350.n463oKHH024142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499306 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060350.n463oJFh024121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499306 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 03:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060350.n463oI1F024097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nando at ccrma.stanford.edu Depends on| |498862, 499300 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060517.n465HDph006817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060515.n465FMSE006565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #20 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-06 01:15:21 EDT --- Just found another one easy-to-fix issue - no need to ship INSTALL file in %doc. It's useless. Please remove it. REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent - see above. Easy to fix, anyway. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. +/- The spec file for the package MUST be legible (except the silly trick with rabbitmq-script-wrapper - I advice you to add some explanations in spec-file, however it's not a blocker). - The sources, used to build the package, MUST match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum rabbitmq-server-1.5.4.tar.gz* dab74bc1a3051cfc94a11abeabb8b0c6 rabbitmq-server-1.5.4.tar.gz 9d43f979d533df743ca7f6050f142040 rabbitmq-server-1.5.4.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ This is a blocker. Please fix it. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji buildlog in the comments above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + No files, listed more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No large documentation files. + Everything, a package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. - Header files must be in a -devel package. Consider creating devel-subpackage for %{_rabbit_erllibdir}/include. Please, note, that in the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package (using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}). + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Ok, let's summarize things. Required to fix: * Add proper source-file to srpm (md5 must match) * Move headers into devel sub-package * Fix rpmlint warning about missing-lsb-keyword * Exclude INSTALL file from %doc. Should fix (not a blocker - just to your consideration) * Add comments, explaining usage of rabbitmq-script-wrapper. * Discover the issue with build failure on EPEL (I'm sure of importance EPEL branch of rabbitmq-server). These are the last obstacles on our road :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499169] Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060521.n465LP8D006526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499169 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-06 01:21:24 EDT --- koji build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1338027 rpmlint silent. 6c992783bdce5d9f6314422b85039fa552b6ad46 cv_RU-1.01.zip suggestions: 1)License should be LGPLv2+. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060523.n465NuZq007728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-06 01:23:55 EDT --- is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060540.n465e8cN009224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 01:40:07 EDT --- Very well, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060549.n465naQY010518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-06 01:49:35 EDT --- Sorry, the description is: %{name} is a software meter bridge for the UNIX based JACK audio system. It supports a number of different types of meter, rendered using the SDL library and user-editable pixmaps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] New: Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Summary: Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/meterbridge.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: %{name} is a software meter bridge is for the UNIX based JACK audio system. It supports a number of different types of meter, rendered using the SDL library and user-editable pixmaps. rpmlint is silent koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1338073 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 05:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 01:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060549.n465nSvu010488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 01:49:27 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060602.n46626rQ012838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Bryson Lee changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] New: Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Summary: Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bamablee at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Tcl SNMP Tools is a Tcl package that provides SNMP tools for managing remote Agents. It uses the NetSNMP library and supports all standard SNMP v1/v2/v3 operations and more: get, set, getnext, walk, bulkget, bulkwalk, trap, translate, and table. This is my first package for Fedora, and so I need a sponsor for this submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:01:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060601.n4661i5h013695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #341662|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060611.n466BBCv014377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060610.n466AuwR015058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060611.n466BOnf015214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060611.n466BcvZ015278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060632.n466WGdU017761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 02:32:15 EDT --- globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060632.n466WLlE018874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 02:32:20 EDT --- globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] New: Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Summary: Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack_capture.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack_capture-0.9.32-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Jack_capture is a program for recording soundfiles with JACK. It's default operation is to capture whatever sound is going out to your speakers into a file, but it can do a number of other operations as well. rpmlint is silent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060635.n466Z3MC019374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060635.n466Z2P0019275@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499316 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060640.n466e7be020112@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #10 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 02:40:05 EDT --- hi Rich, I just noticed this in output from a from-git build on F10: chmod 644 blib/arch/auto/Sys/Guestfs/Guestfs.bs cp lib/Sys/Guestfs.pm blib/lib/Sys/Guestfs.pm Please specify prototyping behavior for Guestfs.xs (see perlxs manual) Is it worth addressing the "please specify..." part? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060645.n466jqlB021072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from nucleo 2009-05-06 02:45:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Very well, > > > APPROVED Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: klatexformula Short Description: Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation Owners: nucleo Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 06:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 02:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060651.n466pjih020934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-06 02:51:44 EDT --- Package fails to build: Error in loadNamespace(i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) : there is no package called 'Biobase' ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'Biostrings' Missing Requires and BuildRequires on R-Biobase? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 07:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 03:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060701.n4671WcB022495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #32 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-06 03:01:31 EDT --- RPM on EL5 cannot do noarch subpkgs. That's a new feature in RPM for Fedora >= 10. To reuse the same spec file, you could do: %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 BuildArch: noarch %endif Note that there are further macros like that. Mentioned on the DistTag guidelines page in the Wiki. [...] F-12 devel: ppc also ran into an internal compiler error. If that will happen again, it may need a bug report. The ppc64/ppc build triggers automatic autotools reconfiguration, which then fails just like a manual "autoreconf -f". Could be related to how you've created your fix-gnu-autotools-compatibility patch and what versions of the autotools you've used. A quick work-around was to run "autoreconf ; libtoolize -c -f" at the end of %prep: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1338113 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 07:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 03:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499169] Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060742.n467grN6030093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499169 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-05-06 03:42:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-cv Short Description: Chuvash hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 07:51:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 03:51:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491650] Review Request: libica - Library for accessing ICA hardware crypto on IBM zSeries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060751.n467p5Fm032721@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491650 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-06 03:51:03 EDT --- Imported and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 07:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 03:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060754.n467sgDp000818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 03:54:41 EDT --- - You're BRing xfce4-panel-devel and hal-devel, aren't dependencies of xfce4-panel and hal automatically picked up? Note different versions in xfce4-panel: BuildRequires: xfce4-panel-devel >= 4.3.99.2 Requires: xfce4-panel >= 4.4.0 [OK, xfce4-panel requirement has to be explicit for dir ownership.] rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - Add missing comma to second line of BRs. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060800.n46804dA002228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 04:00:03 EDT --- - Same note here as well: your version requirements of xfce4-panel and xfce4-panel-devel are different. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060811.n468Bhc1003483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Christian Krause 2009-05-06 04:11:41 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-JSON-RPC-Common New Branches: F-9 Owners: chkr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:13:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:13:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060813.n468Dj4o003938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 04:13:44 EDT --- rpmlint output: xfce4-notifyd.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides desktop-notification-daemon xfce4-notifyd.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided notification-daemon-xfce xfce4-notifyd.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/xfce4-notifyd-config 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - First and last are not a problem, second one maybe should be provided? Up to you. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060818.n468I7GP006171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Sandro Mathys changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:18:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:18:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060818.n468IEc6006207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 04:18:12 EDT --- - And here: requiring different version of xfce4-panel-devel than xfce4-panel. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX - Must Requires: hicolor-icon-theme MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK I'll trust you to fix the missing requires before cvs import. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060820.n468KjiN005652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 04:20:44 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060828.n468SegD007055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #9 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-05-06 04:28:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > > is this built? I uploaded and built the package for all branches but never got around to pushing out the updates. Thanks for pinging me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060837.n468bFGh010179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-06 04:37:14 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060838.n468cBxW010330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-06 04:38:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wavemon Short Description: Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices Owners: fab Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060837.n468bqLl010287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-06 04:37:51 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1338073 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url cf683c623b12342a951f541c9e674cd162a9ad91 meterbridge-0.9.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc12.i586 => Requires: libSDL-1.2.so.0 libSDL_image-1.2.so.0 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libjack.so.0 libm.so.6 libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libm.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides: meterbridge = 0.9.2-3.fc10 + Not a GUI application suggestions: 1) should ask upstream to add contents to README. 2) License tag should be GPLv2+ APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] New: Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Summary: Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC URL: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/flickcurl.spec SRPM URL: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/flickcurl-1.10-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Flickcurl is a C library for the Flickr API, handling creating the requests, signing, token management, calling the API, marshalling request parameters and decoding responses. It uses libcurl to call the REST web service and libxml2 to manipulate the XML responses. Flickcurl supports 100% of the 2009-04-04 version of the API (see Flickcurl API coverage) including the functions for photo/video uploading, browsing, searching, adding and editing comments, groups, notes, photosets, categories, activity, blogs, favorites, places, tags, machine tags, institutions, pandas and photo/video metadata. It also includes a program flickrdf to turn photo metadata, tags, machine tags and places into an RDF triples description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060840.n468eQtj010873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-06 04:40:24 EDT --- Sorry, I will do the review in the next 12 hours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 08:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 04:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060847.n468lXFk011526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-05-06 04:47:32 EDT --- Depends : R , methods , IRanges Imports : methods , utils , IRanges , Biobase -_- I love Bioconductor's dependencies... SPEC: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Biostrings.spec SRPM: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-Biostrings-2.12.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Does not build on koji since R-IRanges does not have the right version available yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 09:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060906.n4696Zi6015069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-06 05:06:34 EDT --- Additional note: websvn 2.2.0 now uses a php pear module to do the diff between files, rather than the system command diff. I've packaged it now, I will file a review request asap. I'll fix websvn Requires: soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 09:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060915.n469FcpN016924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499341 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 09:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060915.n469FbSK016899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492397 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 09:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] New: Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/php-pear-Text-Diff.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides a text-based diff engine and renderers for multiple diff output formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 09:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 05:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905060953.n469rBMh025746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 --- Comment #6 from Roman Rakus 2009-05-06 05:53:09 EDT --- diff -u -p -r1.18 python-docs.spec --- python-docs.spec 26 Feb 2009 21:14:56 -0000 1.18 +++ python-docs.spec 6 May 2009 09:47:22 -0000 @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ %define pybasever 2.6 -Summary: Documentation for the Python programming language. +Summary: Documentation for the Python programming language Name: %{python}-docs Version: %{pybasever} Release: 2%{?dist} @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@ Source: http://www.python.org/ftp/python BuildArch: noarch Patch4: python-2.6-nowhatsnew.patch -#Patch17: python-2.4-tex-fix.patch Patch18: python-2.6-extdocmodules.patch Requires: %{python} = %{version} @@ -29,7 +28,8 @@ Obsoletes: python2-docs Provides: python2-docs = %{version} %endif -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-root +BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) + BuildRequires: %{python} python-sphinx python-docutils python-jinja BuildRequires: python-pygments URL: http://www.python.org/ @@ -46,19 +46,16 @@ for the Python language. %setup -q -n Python-%{version} %patch4 -p1 -b .nowhatsnew -#%%patch17 -p1 -b .tex-fix %patch18 -p1 -b .extdocmodules %build topdir=`pwd` -pushd Doc -make html +make -C Doc html #rm html/index.html.in Makefile* info/Makefile tools/sgmlconv/Makefile -popd %install -[ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ] && rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT @@ -66,7 +63,7 @@ mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT rm -fr $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(-,root,root,755) +%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Misc/NEWS Misc/README Misc/cheatsheet %doc Misc/HISTORY Doc/build/html >- What is the stuff at the beginning needed for? I don't know. The same is in python spec file >- You can use >%{!?pyver: %global pyver %(%{__python} -c "import sys ; print >sys.version[:3]")} >to get the Python base version. I don't change it. I think the better is to set version by hand. >- Patches are not documented. Patches are from previous package - python. I don't know what they were solving... >- Commented patches should be removed. Commented lines removed. Patches aren't in cvs. All else should be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061001.n46A1VWI025096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 --- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-06 06:01:30 EDT --- Weird. Seems to work for me: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1338225 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061022.n46AMOA0031711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 06:22:23 EDT --- OK, please commit the new spec to CVS so I can approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061025.n46APcVu032544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-06 06:25:37 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file - Don't mix '$RPM_BUILD_ROOT' and '%{buildroot}' http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Using_.25.7Bbuildroot.7D_and_.25.7Boptflags.7D_vs_.24RPM_BUILD_ROOT_and_.24RPM_OPT_FLAGS - There are two '%defattr(-, root, root, -)' entries - You are working with users/group. Aren't 'Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd /usr/sbin/groupadd' and 'Requires(postun): /usr/sbin/userdel /usr/sbin/groupdel' missing? - Same with the service. 'Requires(post): chkconfig' and 'Requires(preun): chkconfig' - disttag is not needed in changelog, you can remove '.fc10' there -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061029.n46ATfhk030930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fabian at bernewireless.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 10:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 06:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061050.n46AoxWV005625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 --- Comment #8 from Roman Rakus 2009-05-06 06:50:58 EDT --- done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 11:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061116.n46BGZVK011009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-06 07:16:34 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/flickcurl.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/flickcurl-1.10-2.fc10.src.rpm Updated with rapdor added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 11:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061140.n46BeFYl013164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 07:40:14 EDT --- - You might want to add "-p" to "mkdir $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" in install phase. - Also, you can remove the unnecessary topdir=`pwd` from the build phase. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 11:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226341] Merge Review: python-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061140.n46BeXCZ016167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226341 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 11:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061145.n46BjO3W014045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 11:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061145.n46BjDXI017163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 11:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 07:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061147.n46BlW7b014269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-05-06 07:47:30 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-i18n-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe* wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any-subscribe/i18n/add-to-any-subscribe.mo /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any-subscribe/i18n/add-to-any-subscribe-da_DK.mo /usr/share/locale/da_DK/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any-subscribe/i18n/add-to-any-subscribe-zh_CN.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any-subscribe/i18n/add-to-any-subscribe-da_DK.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any-subscribe/i18n/add-to-any-subscribe-zh_CN.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any-subscribe/i18n/add-to-any-subscribe.mo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The errors are expected and documented in the spec file. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Appears to be GPLv3 See more information below. FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. The website you reference in the spec does indeed say that the files and content are licensed under the GPL and then links to a copy of GPLv3. However the license linked is not GPLv3+. I trust this is something that you can fix before it hits CVS. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. 02049bf88fa2b594dce643e1842b5aea add-to-any-subscribe.0.9.6.4.1.zip 02049bf88fa2b594dce643e1842b5aea add-to-any-subscribe.0.9.6.4.1.zip.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. At least works on x86_64, though since it's a noarch package should work anywhere. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061202.n46C2k8E020649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-05-06 08:02:45 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10.noarch.rpm wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-pt_PT.mo /usr/share/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-ca.mo /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any.mo /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-zh_CN.mo /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-es_ES.mo /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-be.mo /usr/share/locale/be/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-da_DK.mo /usr/share/locale/da_DK/LC_MESSAGES/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-be.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-ca.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-da_DK.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-es_ES.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-pt_PT.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any-zh_CN.mo wordpress-plugin-add-to-any.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/i18n/add-to-any.mo 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 14 warnings. The errors are expected and documented in the spec file. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Appears to be GPLv3 See more information below. FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. The website you reference in the spec does indeed say that the files and content are licensed under the GPL and then links to a copy of GPLv3. However the license linked is not GPLv3+. I trust this is something that you can fix before it hits CVS. NA: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. WORRISOME: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. So I initially tried to wget the source and md5sum and received a mismatch, so I then started from scratch, installed the SRPM anew and grabbed the source 5 times with wget. Running md5sum against these 6 files yields three different md5sums - two of which match the source. I must admit a bit of being baffled unless one of the mirrors has twiddled some bits somewhere. I can't say that yours doesn't match - as 40% of my attempts it did, but the fact that I had two other md4sums including 1 that was identical to another attempt suggests that there may well be some issues upstream. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip* b45368df0ce7b9569310591e139e6a15 add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip 6cecc3457d68431e90f95204a1fe2c1d add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip.1 6cecc3457d68431e90f95204a1fe2c1d add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip.2 b45368df0ce7b9569310591e139e6a15 add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip.3 b45368df0ce7b9569310591e139e6a15 add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip.4 d8efa18c04f3c072d046a3c319ffc29a add-to-any.0.9.9.2.3.zip.5 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. At least works on x86_64, though since it's a noarch package should work anywhere. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Not really applicable though. No real build. OK: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061212.n46CCFCN022734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #11 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 08:12:14 EDT --- Hi Rich, In src/guestfs.c, you probably want to use a read wrapper so you don't have to worry about EINTR and EAGAIN (the code should retry, not fail in those cases). It looks like there are a few others that would benefit. while (!cancel && (r = read (fd, buf, sizeof buf)) > 0) { err = send_file_data_sync (g, buf, r); if (err < 0) { if (err == -2) /* daemon sent cancellation */ send_file_cancellation_sync (g); return err; } } -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061213.n46CDDDh022922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #12 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 08:13:12 EDT --- Please use an unsigned type for length-only variables like "len" here: This is partly stylistic, and partly to keep reviewers from wondering if they can be negative. Added bonus, use a wider type like size_t and you don't have to worry about overflow if there's ever an input of 2^32 bytes or longer. guestfs__receive_file_sync (guestfs_h *g, const char *filename) { void *buf; int fd, r, len; fd = open (filename, O_WRONLY|O_CREAT|O_TRUNC|O_NOCTTY, 0666); if (fd == -1) { perrorf (g, "open: %s", filename); goto cancel; } -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061213.n46CDeML023000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #13 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 08:13:39 EDT --- This realloc (from guestfsd.c) leaks upon failure: if (r > 0 && stdoutput) { so_size += r; *stdoutput = realloc (*stdoutput, so_size); if (*stdoutput == NULL) { perror ("realloc"); *stdoutput = NULL; continue; } memcpy (*stdoutput + so_size - r, buf, r); } Also, this stmt is unnecessary: *stdoutput = NULL; Same thing with unnecessary code below: if (*stdoutput == NULL) { perror ("realloc"); *stdoutput = NULL; } else and with stderror: if (*stderror == NULL) { perror ("realloc"); *stderror = NULL; More importantly, it looks like this function can return 0 even when it has set *stdoutput to NULL, and that would make the following from file.c deference out==NULL: r = command (&out, &err, "file", "-bsL", buf, NULL); if (freeit) free (buf); if (r == -1) { free (out); reply_with_error ("file: %s: %s", path, err); free (err); return NULL; } free (err); /* We need to remove the trailing \n from output of file(1). */ len = strlen (out); if (out[len-1] == '\n') out[len-1] = '\0'; Also, so_size and se_size become invalid upon failed realloc. You should change it so that they are increased only if realloc succeeds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061216.n46CGrtE023926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #15 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 08:16:52 EDT --- Since "make check" doesn't pass for me, I haven't yet tried running things under valgrind. Have you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061214.n46CEjP1023282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #14 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 08:14:44 EDT --- I've built the RPM from a git clone on F10: make dist && rpmbuild -ta libguestfs-1.0.18.tar.gz It satisfies all MUST requirements and almost all SHOULDs. The only missing SHOULD is gettext support. However, I'm still getting the "make check" failures we've been looking at for some time. Probably not worth worrying about if I'm the only one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 12:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 08:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061249.n46CnT1D026463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #16 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-06 08:49:27 EDT --- oops. re #14, there's no SHOULD-use-gettext. I didn't read carefully enough the one that mentioned translations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061318.n46DIU50005974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora_requires_release_not | |e? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-06 09:18:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - You're BRing xfce4-panel-devel and hal-devel, aren't dependencies of > xfce4-panel and hal automatically picked up? Note different versions in > xfce4-panel: > > BuildRequires: xfce4-panel-devel >= 4.3.99.2 > Requires: xfce4-panel >= 4.4.0 Hal is not picked up automatically, only hal-libs is pulled in, not hald. xfce4-panel will be pulled in automatically but the different versions are intended: BuildRequires is as low as possible to make it easier to rebuild the package on other branches/distros/ as well. Requirements are adjusted to follow the versions on our repos more closely. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-cddrive-plugin Short Description: Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061319.n46DJDCc001754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora_requires_release_not |fedora-cvs? |e? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061320.n46DKABO006779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-06 09:20:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Same note here as well: your version requirements of xfce4-panel and > xfce4-panel-devel are different. Intended. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin Short Description: Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:23:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:23:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061323.n46DNtqi007659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-06 09:23:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - First and last are not a problem, second one maybe should be provided? Up to > you. I don't think I should, notification-daemon-xfce was never in Fedora or packaged at all. Nothing will require it, the Obsoletes: is just for smother upgrading. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-notifyd Short Description: Simple notification daemon for Xfce Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061327.n46DRYa1008725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-06 09:27:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - And here: requiring different version of xfce4-panel-devel than xfce4-panel. Again intended. One is what configure really checks for, the other is what this package is build against. > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. NEEDSFIX > - Must Requires: hicolor-icon-theme Not necessary, because it requires gtk2, which already requires hicolor-icon-theme. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xfce4-radio-plugin Short Description: V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061333.n46DXaX9009877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2009-05-06 09:33:34 EDT --- Benjamin, can you please look at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/jakub/task_1338267/ and say if that's what you want or not? If so, I'll do a real build soon. All I found so far is that I need to remove all *~ files from the html directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061348.n46DmQTa009091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-06 09:48:25 EDT --- Behdad, I requested commit access for this package a while ago, but nothing happen. In fact the package maintainer should patch the spec file, build the package, and a packager should do the merge review ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061358.n46DwjAt011614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #16 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-06 09:58:44 EDT --- Okay, updated. Spec URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem.spec SRPM URL: http://mattdm.org/misc/fedora/smem-0.1-4.fc11.mattdm.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061400.n46E0Dun012112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 James Laska changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jlaska at redhat.com --- Comment #26 from James Laska 2009-05-06 10:00:10 EDT --- Should this bug remain open? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 13:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 09:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061358.n46DwNjN011541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 Daniel Novotny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dnovotny at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #12 from Daniel Novotny 2009-05-06 09:58:21 EDT --- hello, I made the suggested .spec changes: * added purpose comments to all patches * fixed URL * fixed %defattr as for the others: > * Not necessary to define globally when used only for make configure and autoreconf doesn't use those? I'm not sure... > * don't mix variable and macro style as far as I can see, there's only variable style for those two variables output: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/psmisc.review.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] New: Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 Summary: Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://ampache.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/ampache.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/ampache-3.5-6.fc10.src.rpm Ampache is a web based audio/video streaming application and file manager allowing you to access your music & videos from anywhere, using almost any internet enabled device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061413.n46ED1SZ018943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 --- Comment #13 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-06 10:12:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > [...] > output: > http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/psmisc.review.spec Looks good to me. (Don't forget tu bump changelog entry when in CVS, please.) Jon: Are you satisfied? Will you approve it, or should I? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061409.n46E9v7g017941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 10:09:55 EDT --- - Any reason why SMP make is not enabled? (make %{?_smp_mflags}) - Package includes internal glib, which is not allowed. Use BR: glib-devel and --with-installed-glib option to configure. rpmlint output: pkgconfig.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/pkg-config 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - This is kind of expected. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. N/A MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSFIX - %defattr should be (-,root,root,-) MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add ChangeLog to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061420.n46EKlOo020757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-06 10:20:45 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061423.n46ENssF021228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 10:23:53 EDT --- - Buildroot is obsolete. Use %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) instead. rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - There is no mention of a license in the package! MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSFIX - Source url is missing! MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Time stamps are lost in install and in character set conversion. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. ~OK - Vendor tag is incorrect. In fact there shouldn't be any, but this can't be changed due to compatibility reasons. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 14:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061452.n46Eq3xf028662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 10:52:01 EDT --- Okay, looks good, APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 15:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] New: Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Summary: Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guido.grazioli at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec SRPM URL: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This project provides a convenient, compact, pre-packaged and comprehensively documented suite of command line option parsers for the use of Java programmers. Initially, parsing compatible with GNU-style 'getopt' is provided. rpmlint is silent, koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1338557 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 15:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 11:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061508.n46F8oOp028639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |low Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Severity|medium |low -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 16:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497593] Review Request: gnome-alsamixer - advanced mixer for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061615.n46GFM7V013709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497593 --- Comment #27 from Adam Williamson 2009-05-06 12:15:21 EDT --- I'd tend towards 'no'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 16:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 12:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061649.n46GnsQP024332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-06 12:49:53 EDT --- > - Package includes internal glib, which is not allowed. Use BR: glib-devel and > --with-installed-glib option to configure. Please take a minute to understand why things are the way they are...then you will see that it needs to be this way. Hint: glib is using pkg-config itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:19:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:19:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061719.n46HJHV3000322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2009-05-06 13:19:16 EDT --- Yes, this package is still needed. http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc9.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who.spec * Wed May 06 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0.13-1 - Update to the latest upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061720.n46HK4Ya001513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-05-06 13:20:04 EDT --- Sorry, bad link: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061723.n46HNKDh001976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-06 13:23:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Review: Thank you for the review Parag! > suggestions: > 1) should ask upstream to add contents to README. I'll do that. > 2) License tag should be GPLv2+ The source files do not specify the version of GPL in their headers. In this case we choose GPL+ as per the guidelines. Please see instrcution #4 at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F Do I miss something? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: meterbridge Short Description: Meter Bridge for JACK Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:47:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061747.n46HlwBF009081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de --- Comment #9 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-05-06 13:47:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > - Package includes internal glib, which is not allowed. Use BR: glib-devel and > > --with-installed-glib option to configure. > > Please take a minute to understand why things are the way they are...then you > will see that it needs to be this way. Hint: glib is using pkg-config itself. Hint: Your argument is a nop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061749.n46HnB6t006084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #6 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-06 13:49:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > A few notes: > > - .la files need to be removed, add > find . -name *.la -exec rm {} \; > to the end of the install phase > > - if possible, static library build should be disable (usually %configure > --disable-static) > > - devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig > > - you're running autoreconf, but not BRing the packages => the package will not > build in mock. Autoreconf'ing is frowned upon, and should not be done unless it > is specifically necessary. I may not have been clear before, but I addressed those 4 issues you found and they are resolved in my second round of rpms. Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1407423 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-2.fc10.src.rpm Any other issues I can fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 17:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 13:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061758.n46HwSDV011676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #48 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 13:58:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmonad Short Description: a tiling window manager written in haskell Owners: ynemoy Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fedora-haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 18:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061808.n46I8IqY013881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-06 14:08:17 EDT --- >From very quick glance at your spec file: - Fedora suggests that one line in %description must not have more than 79 characters (please check rpmlint warnings) - Use macros consistently. ---------------------------------------------------- 31 Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} 36 Requires: sipwitch = %{version}-%{release} ---------------------------------------------------- - Would you explain why some of the subpackage does not have the dependency for main package? - %{buildroot} is missing: ---------------------------------------------------- %{__rm} -f %{_libdir}/*.la %{__rm} -f %{_libdir}/sipwitch/*.la ---------------------------------------------------- - Perhaps "INSTALL" is not needed for rpm document files. - Files under %_mandir are automatically marked as %doc. - The main package must not own the directory %_sbindir, %_bindir themselves. - For initscripts related convention, * please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_on_the_filesystem https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscript_packaging From rpmlint: * service should not be enabled by default (i.e. change ----------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: 2345 95 15 ----------------------------------------------------- to ----------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig: - 95 15 ----------------------------------------------------- * init script should have "status" entry (please also check "$ rpmlint -I no-status-entry") * init script should put a lock file in %_localstatedir/lock/subsys . - {_datadir}/snmp{,/mibs} is not owned by the main package but it installs some files under these directories. These directories are owned by net-snmp-libs, currently this package (sipwitch) does not seem to require net-snmp-libs. Would you check if sipwitch should require net-snmp-libs? (or examine why some files are installed under %_datadir/snmp?) - Using %_libdir/python* is wrong (by the way this does not seem to work on 64 bit architecture). Please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture - Because of some reasons (one of the reasons is to avoid selinux AVC denial), we always install byte-compiled .py{o,c} files altogether (note that these .py{o,c} files are automatically created by /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile). So - these files must appear in %files list (using sipwitch.py* is easier) - creating/removing byte-compiled python files in scriptlets (i.e. at %post or so) should be removed. - Usually configuration files should be marked as %config(noreplace) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Configuration_files - When only /sbin/ldconfig is called on a scriptlet, use -p option to avoid unneeded shell call, like: --------------------------------------------------------- %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig --------------------------------------------------------- (however also please check initscripts scriptlets convention) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 18:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061810.n46IAG9h010658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-06 14:10:13 EDT --- This package itself seems good. Then when you clean up sipwitch srpm (on bug 499137), I will approve this package and sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 18:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061838.n46IcqoW016034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #7 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-05-06 14:38:51 EDT --- Just a few: replace /usr/share/doc with %{_docdir} in the %files section. And: rpmlint of libmetalink-devel: libmetalink-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A Metalink C library devel package. libmetalink-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation And you have to own the directory /usr/include/metalink -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 18:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 14:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061850.n46Iodt2018674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-06 14:50:38 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary RPMs on at least one supported architecture Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 i386]$ rpmlint gcolor2* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) spec file: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: GPLv2 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 223a126b8a87234d1552be4be4140789 Build source: 223a126b8a87234d1552be4be4140789 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [-] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [x] Follows desktop entry spec [x] Valid .desktop Name [x] Valid .desktop GenericName [x] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [x] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [x] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F10/i386 [x] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339014 [x] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I see no further blocker, package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061906.n46J6S61021937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-06 15:06:27 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gcolor2 Short Description: Simple color selector for GTK+2 Owners: cwickert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] New: Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Summary: Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ssorce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libtalloc/libtalloc.spec SRPM URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libtalloc/libtalloc-1.3.0-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: Spin off libtalloc from the samba4 package into its own now that upstream has finally released a separate tarball. The package name and versioning is consistent with what was provided by the samba4 package so dropping this in and disabling building "talloc" from the samba4 package should provide a seamless migration path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] New: Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 Summary: Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-morbid.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Morbid is a Twisted-based publish/subscribe messaging server that uses the STOMP protocol. It supports publish/subscribe topics, and runs as a single node. It is designed specifically for usecases where a clustered message broker is not necessary. Koji Scratch Build (F12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339067 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061923.n46JNhaM028953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-05-06 15:23:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-Biostrings Short Description: String objects representing biological sequences Owners: pingou Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061928.n46JSoI9029845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: python-orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061928.n46JSnqF029824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] New: Review Request: python-orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Summary: Review Request: python-orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-orbited.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-orbited-0.7.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Orbited provides a pure JavaScript/HTML socket in the browser. It is a web router and firewall that allows you to integrate web applications with arbitrary back-end systems. You can implement any network protocol in the browser?without resorting to plugins. Koji Scratch Build (F12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061928.n46JS3gp025975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 15:28:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > - Package includes internal glib, which is not allowed. Use BR: glib-devel and > > --with-installed-glib option to configure. > > Please take a minute to understand why things are the way they are...then you > will see that it needs to be this way. Hint: glib is using pkg-config itself. Once there is a glib package available there's no problem to build against it. This is a cyclic dependency and is nothing new. Just define a bootstrap variable that chooses between a) normal case: use glib package from distro or b) bootstrap: build with internal glib [then build glib with the newly built pkgconfig and redo build with a)] You only have to bootstrap once a distribution, and even that you should be able to do with a). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061929.n46JTW1g029959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: orbited - A |python-orbited - A |browser(javascript)->tcp |browser(javascript)->tcp |bridge |bridge | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061933.n46JXhix030773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-06 15:33:42 EDT --- I remembered why I didn't name this python-orbited... there is a separate pyorbited package that is the client bits. To minimize confusion, I've renamed it to orbited. No other changes were made. New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/orbited.spec New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/orbited-0.7.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build (F12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339097 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:41:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:41:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061941.n46JfHtK028855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-06 15:41:15 EDT --- I would take a look on your source RPM. But It's seems, it is not available on koji anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 19:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 15:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905061953.n46JrmwZ031131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #8 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-06 15:53:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Just a few: > > replace /usr/share/doc with %{_docdir} in the %files section. Ok. > And: > > rpmlint of libmetalink-devel: > libmetalink-devel.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot A Metalink C library devel > package. Ok. > libmetalink-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation I don't need to do anything about that, right? > And you have to own the directory /usr/include/metalink %files %dir /usr/include/metalink Is that all? Thanks Ruben! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062007.n46K7Anr005910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-06 16:07:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7)> And you have to own the directory /usr/include/metalink > > %files > %dir /usr/include/metalink A lot neater is to %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_includedir}/metalink/ Also, according to your files listing there is still a static library in the devel package; you either have to exclude it from the package or make the devel package provide libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062014.n46KE2K5007391@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #17 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-06 16:14:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I would take a look on your source RPM. But It's seems, it is not available on > koji anymore. Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/LuxRender.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/LuxRender-0.5-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system ^^ This one is still valid (0.6 is nearing, but 0.5 is fine also) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] New: Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-who-testutil.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm Description: repoze.who-testutil is a repoze.who plugin which modifies repoze.who?s original middleware to make it easier to forge authentication, without bypassing identification (this is, running the metadata providers). It?s been created in order to ease testing of repoze.who-powered applications, in a way independent of the identifiers, authenticators and challengers used originally by your application, so that you won?t have to update your test suite as your application grows and the authentication method changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062013.n46KDpCR004020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062013.n46KDoQu003991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 427718] Review Request: Megazeux - Text-character driven game creation system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062020.n46KKZtt009423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427718 Steve Salevan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Group|fedora_contrib | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062029.n46KToBm007574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499486 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062029.n46KTnqo007544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |476789 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] New: Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-pylons.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides optional and handy utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what. Some of the features of the plugin include: * The utilities are ready to use: There?s nothing additional to be configured before using. * 100% documented. Each component is documented along with code samples. * The test suite has a coverage of 100% and it will never decrease ? if it ever does, report it as a bug! * TurboGears 2 is officially supported as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062038.n46KcNuS012749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 Matthew Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |mattdm at mattdm.org Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #17 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-06 16:38:19 EDT --- Reopening for reevaluation in light of recent developments -- a new release, and new promises from Novell that it will now get the proper support it needs to develop as an open source project. See LWN.net article: http://lwn.net/Articles/330870/ (subscriber only content for now but will open to the public shortly -- in the meantime if you need access). Is anyone else interested in still working on this? Christopher? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062041.n46Kf8GM010168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-06 16:41:06 EDT --- I have test the symlink createn in ~/.blender/scripts with installed blender and blender-freeworld. the accept symlinks was created during the start of blender. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] New: Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 Summary: Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-coverage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-coverage-2.85-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Coverage.py is a Python module that measures code coverage during Python execution. It uses the code analysis tools and tracing hooks provided in the Python standard library to determine which lines are executable, and which have been executed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:43:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:43:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062043.n46KhshZ013941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #14 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-06 16:43:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Mauricio, I'd apply the changes from Ryan to fix outstanding issues. If you > don't understand why something is being done, go ahead and ask here before > applying that section and either Ryan or I can explain what's being done and > whether there are other/better ways. Ok, sure, what is the final status of this package then?, can be say it that is ready?, is going to be included into fed11, fed12?, any chance that can be rebuilded with all mono/monodevelop stack for fed10? Thanks Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062046.n46KkCUZ014711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #14 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-06 16:46:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #9) > > > Oh -- and this just a readability nit. I'd move this up to the top: > > > # rpm does not currently pull debuginfo out of mono packages > > > %global debug_package %{nil} > > > > Ok, I have to move that to the tip of the file? or just before %description ? > > > top of the file. It's easiest to spot definitions of global variables when > they're at the top. what is the status of this package then?, can be say it that is ready?, is going to be included into fed11, fed12?, any chance that can be rebuilded with all mono/monodevelop stack for fed10? Thanks Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062055.n46KtTqj013011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-06 16:55:28 EDT --- Tweaks and fixes: SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/thrift-0.0-0.fc10.20090505svn770888.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn260&r=260&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/thrift/thrift.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062056.n46Kuraf013232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 16:56:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062056.n46Ku9nd016693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #49 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 16:56:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062058.n46Kwckb017023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 16:58:36 EDT --- cvs done (with F-11 branch as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] New: Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Summary: Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ssorce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libtdb/libtdb.spec SRPM URL: http://simo.fedorapeople.org/libtdb/libtdb-1.1.3-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: Spin off libtdb from the samba4 package into its own now that upstream has finally released a separate tarball. The package name and versioning is consistent with what was provided by the samba4 package so dropping this in and disabling building "tdb" from the samba4 package should provide a seamless migration path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062100.n46L0RGE017948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:00:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:04:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:04:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062104.n46L4QwM018459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:04:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 20:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 16:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062059.n46KxUkv017353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 16:59:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062103.n46L3iu4014889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:03:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062102.n46L2fdb014769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:02:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062107.n46L7M7U015877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:07:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062105.n46L5Rsb015586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:05:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062108.n46L899r019566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:08:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062106.n46L6Or6019312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:06:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062108.n46L8dAV019653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbarnes at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbarnes at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062105.n46L54GS018970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #19 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-06 17:05:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I have test the symlink createn in ~/.blender/scripts with installed blender > and blender-freeworld. the accept symlinks was created during the start of > blender. I'm not sure to understand well... Anyway, would you take this test case: - Install blender (or the other variant). - Run blender to ensure the user script directory got created - Install LuxRender - Check that the LuxRender scripts ends in the end-user directory. - Verify that the LuxRender exports scripts are available from the blender window, and that end-user can tweak LuxRender configuration (which must persist on next blender run). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:09:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:09:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062109.n46L9r1B016296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:09:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062111.n46LBUmL016903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:11:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062112.n46LCAcZ016999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:12:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062108.n46L8sx9016173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mbarnes at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mbarnes at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062110.n46LAbhI020272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:10:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499169] Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062115.n46LFZIN018071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499169 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:15:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062113.n46LDb6O017400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:13:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062114.n46LEE7j017477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:14:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:12:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:12:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062112.n46LCrvL017241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:12:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062116.n46LGE0C021398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:16:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:17:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062117.n46LHZPG021639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:17:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062116.n46LGsQt021504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:16:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062118.n46LIsEp021800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:18:53 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062118.n46LIG41018588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:18:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:19:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:19:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062119.n46LJtG3022077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-06 17:19:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 21:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062157.n46LvHmb027904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-05-06 17:57:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > * Patch0: TODO > > - it is recommended to send the patches upstream and add a short comment > > in the spec file about the status of the bug report > > > > I sent them the patch and the desktop file I'm using via email since they don't > have a bugtracker. Ok, thanks! > > * Compilation: TODO > > - mock build works > > - package builds correctly in koji for F12, F11 and F10 > > - auto* tools adds additionally "-O2" (via acinclude.m4) - this is not a > > problem right now, but probably if Fedora changes once its default optimization > > flags then the package would be compiled with "-O2 -O3" or something like this > > (I don't consider this as a big issue, but if it could be solved easily, then > > it should be fixed IMHO) > > > > -O2 comes before %optflags during compilation, and the last one wins. Hence it > won't affect any effect even if our %optflags start using -O3. > > I can still change it but do you think it's worth? (I will need to BR autohell > since I will have to change the timestamp of the m4 file) Yes, I agree with your conclusion and that since there isn't a real problem here it is not worth to re-build all autotools-generated files including configure. > > * packages must own all directories: TODO > > - in general OK > > - just a very minor suggestion: %{_datadir}/apps/%{name} should better be > > %{_datadir}/apps/%{name}/ (just to indicate that really a directory and not a > > file gets packaged) > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. I usually do it the way you told but apparently I > missed it this time. Ok. > > * functional test: TODO > > - program starts and can be used > > - however, when I press "play", I get an message box "Error:" (the sound > > settings are not touched, all channels are set to "alsa_pcm:capture_1/2" or > > "alsa_pcm:playback_1/2" ) - I'm not sure whether there is any need to > > configure any jack-related settings in my system... > > You will need to have a running jackd before you use creox (many jack > applications don't start jackd by themselves automatically). > > I recommend using qjackctl for starting/configuring jack and controlling jack > ports. Also if you didn't do it already, check the file > /usr/share/doc/jack-audio-connection-kit-*/README.Fedora > for setting up your jack configuration before you start it up. It's worth it. After I setup jackd, the error did not happen anymore. Since I don't have the needed equipment, I could not do a complete functionality test. > Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/creox.spec > SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10.src.rpm The new package looks good, all issues were addressed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062204.n46M42ru029764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Bug 426754 depends on bug 426753, which changed state. Bug 426753 Summary: Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062204.n46M40id029728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #50 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 18:03:59 EDT --- Built on rawhide and Fedora 11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=101104 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062209.n46M9ZUn031026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 18:09:34 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062247.n46MlDhA005573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 Bug 498194 depends on bug 498688, which changed state. Bug 498688 Summary: Please build latest libical for EPEL 4 and 5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498688 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 22:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 18:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062259.n46Mxveq009897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #33 from Feng Yu 2009-05-06 18:59:54 EDT --- Updated to 0.7.5-2 http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/ It might be more prudent to move the schemas file in the next release -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062314.n46NEFRc009704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-06 19:14:14 EDT --- Thanks again, for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: creox Short Description: Real-time Sound Processor Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062322.n46NMQPA013467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:22:25 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062324.n46NORat013825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.4.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NNkea013650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:23:45 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NNDfp013569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:23:12 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NNpV4013685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062324.n46NONGr011492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:24:20 EDT --- ugene-1.4.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPA0Y011944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:25:09 EDT --- firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NNW0f011293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:23:31 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062327.n46NRCbv012435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.02-1.fc10 |1.02-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPZYH012105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:25:34 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062326.n46NQ7Xn012237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.02-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPdGn012139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20030323-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NNHOT011240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.5-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NNbKA011330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062326.n46NQQF7012295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:26:26 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update clthreads'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062323.n46NN64g011193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:23:05 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4221 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062324.n46NOYTp011542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:24:33 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clthreads'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPOt4014467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:25:23 EDT --- perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062326.n46NQYnY014815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:26:33 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062327.n46NR8jC014952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:27:07 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062324.n46NOllG014000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:24:46 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062327.n46NReo5015058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2-1.fc9 |2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062326.n46NQ299014620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:26:02 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPFRK014430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062327.n46NRZ8f015022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:27:34 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062324.n46NOwB4014041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:24:57 EDT --- perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NP3Mb014364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.002-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062325.n46NPS5B014502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.010.101-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062327.n46NRv3Z015117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062326.n46NQaPC014852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:26:35 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xcowsay'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4255 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVp68014100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:31:50 EDT --- perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NW2jL014153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:32:01 EDT --- firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWIaQ014226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.010.101-2.fc10 |1.010.101-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062327.n46NRqH8012851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:27:51 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWDgP014190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:32:13 EDT --- perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUZpw013840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:30:34 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTU0e013217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:29:30 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUxDv013923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:30:58 EDT --- chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts-20030323-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491530] Review Request: chisholm-letterslaughing-fonts - Decorative/LED sans-serif font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NV3Kx013954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491530 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20030323-1.fc10 |20030323-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVNK7014023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc10 |0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTfRT013280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:29:40 EDT --- python-cclib-0.91-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUfIc013874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.5-1.fc10 |5.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVf0h014064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:31:40 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062328.n46NSBov012915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:28:11 EDT --- perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062328.n46NSGYe012944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.98-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTZ7F013253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.03-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTwKh013359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.16-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVAtX013986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:31:09 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTGXv013173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:29:15 EDT --- php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Archive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWdmQ016784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:32:38 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NU6sC016116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:30:05 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUOPd016223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:30:22 EDT --- soci-3.0.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVJ37016491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:31:18 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062333.n46NXIYE016935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:33:16 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVtr3016623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NW7Ge016682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc9 |2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494857] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTrW2015778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494857 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:29:52 EDT --- pidgin-musictracker-0.4.16-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVYS4016555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.001-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVUmF016531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:31:29 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062331.n46NVj2P016587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.002-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062333.n46NXVPT016974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:33:30 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUT4n016262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0.0-6.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:30:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062330.n46NUB9I016154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWskn016855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1.6-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062329.n46NTkSh015725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.91-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWO8L016746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Bug 492990 depends on bug 492969, which changed state. Bug 492969 Summary: Review Request: lv2dynparam - LV2 dynamic parameters extension https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492969 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:32:23 EDT --- zynjacku-4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWobA016818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Bug 498214 depends on bug 497338, which changed state. Bug 497338 Summary: Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:32:49 EDT --- gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWhq3014614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-2.fc10 |1.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062333.n46NXNcm014712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.19.0-1.fc10 |0.20.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:33:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:33:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062333.n46NXZgS014761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-1.fc10 |0.5.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062332.n46NWUE2014400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062333.n46NX4gn014667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 19:33:04 EDT --- php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Archive'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4302 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 6 23:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 19:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905062344.n46NiejQ016133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #10 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-06 19:44:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7)> And you have to own the directory /usr/include/metalink > > > > %files > > %dir /usr/include/metalink > > A lot neater is to > > %files devel > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_includedir}/metalink/ Thank you, I'll go with your neater solution :) > Also, according to your files listing there is still a static library in the > devel package; you either have to exclude it from the package or make the devel > package provide libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} I added this to the devel package: Provides: libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} but the same files are included in the devel package. libmetalink-devel-0.0.3-3.fc10.i386.rpm : drwxr-xr-x /usr/include/metalink -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/metalink/metalink_error.h -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/metalink/metalink_parser.h -rw-r--r-- /usr/include/metalink/metalink_types.h -rwxr-xr-x /usr/lib/libmetalink.la lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libmetalink.so -rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/pkgconfig/libmetalink.pc Which is the static library in the devel package? Which is better, excluding it from the package or making the devel package provide libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070007.n47070oi019936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 20:07:00 EDT --- meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070005.n4705UH1019792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 20:05:29 EDT --- meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070006.n470618b022497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 20:06:00 EDT --- meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070026.n470QxY7023545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #51 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 20:26:58 EDT --- Thanks, F11 build needs to be tweaked or wait for ghc-rpm-macros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 00:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 20:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426753] Review Request: xmonad - A tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070037.n470bvGp027586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426753 --- Comment #52 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 20:37:56 EDT --- Yeah, i was gonna do that in one fell swoop. If someone could finish that review, it'll mean i won't have to bother putting in a temporary fix in the xmonad-fc11 package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 01:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 21:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070100.n4710vCi031211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #3 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 21:00:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm Includes AUTHORS and GPLv3 License. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070328.n473SeS3024791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #2 from David Sugar 2009-05-06 23:28:39 EDT --- To do this I will also had to add a patch until changes make it into the next upstream release...but I have a question, on net-snmp. We are supplying a valid snmp MIB, and it really does belong in the mib directory. So I created sipwitch-snmp as a sub-package. Updated Spec: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec Current Patch: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.patch Updated SRPM: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070333.n473XES9026248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:33:13 EDT --- grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070333.n473XJbT026296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:33:18 EDT --- grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:32:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:32:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070332.n473WFla026126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-06 23:32:13 EDT --- built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=101156 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070335.n473ZCj6026076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070334.n473Ycol025684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-06 23:34:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342766) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342766) ghc-rpm-macros.spec-2.patch Basically looks ok now to me but would suggest these small changes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:35:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:35:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070335.n473Zkfa026844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-06 23:35:45 EDT --- built in rawhide - waiting for perl-Text-Context-EitherSide to go stable for F-10 & F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070337.n473bSfJ026506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-06 23:37:27 EDT --- built in rawhide - wait for perl-Class-Mix to go stable in F-10 & F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070342.n473gou4027939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:42:49 EDT --- perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070343.n473hgWp028056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:43:42 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070344.n473i6YX028106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #6 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 23:44:05 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Renames LICENSE back to COPYING, and removes extra comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:41:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:41:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070341.n473fagk027823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-06 23:41:35 EDT --- built in rawhide - waiting for perl-XML-XPathEngine on branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:44:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:44:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070344.n473iIlC028165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-06 23:44:17 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070344.n473iRe9027626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-06 23:44:27 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:42:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:42:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070342.n473gjZK027428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:42:44 EDT --- perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070343.n473hYFq027515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #5 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-06 23:43:34 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-.fc10.src.rpm Renames LICENSE back to COPYING, and removes extra comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070343.n473hbjU027548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:43:36 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070344.n473iW9X028301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-06 23:44:31 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070349.n473nlfV028387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #11 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-05-06 23:49:46 EDT --- The .la is a libtool archive, not a static library. Just remove it. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070354.n473sg4t029789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:54:41 EDT --- perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 03:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 23:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070354.n473sliD029821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-06 23:54:46 EDT --- perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:13:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:13:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kde-plasma-yawp.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This colorful plasmoid shows weather maps, reports and forecasts. rpmlint is silent. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340028 This is my favorite weather plasmoid. It resembles the legendary liquid weather karamba theme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070421.n474Lfux001875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-07 00:21:40 EDT --- yes you are correct. make it GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 04:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 00:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070452.n474qpZi006781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-07 00:52:50 EDT --- The package looks good. There are only these rpmlints: * rpmlints: kde-plasma-stasks.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1/README kde-plasma-stasks.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1/COPYING These can be fixed easily. Could you also tell upstream to fix these strange permission issues themselves? They seem to be pretty active. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340052 Please fix the rpmlints before you commit. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (kde-plasma-stasks) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- Could you have a look at the plasmoid I packaged? (Bug #499531) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070504.n4754IjV008565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #12 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-07 01:04:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The .la is a libtool archive, not a static library. Just remove it. > See > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Ah, I had (almost) read that but missed the part about .la files. (I'd skipped down to the bold title). I have already done this as suggested in comment #3: - .la files need to be removed, add find . -name *.la -exec rm {} \; to the end of the install phase I looked at another .spec file & this appears to work: find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name *.la -exec rm {} \; Now /usr/lib/libmetalink.a is no longer packaged, I take it that's fine? Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1415019 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:35:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:35:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070535.n475ZgJp014067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 01:35:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Now /usr/lib/libmetalink.a is no longer packaged, I take it that's fine? > > Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1415019 > SRPM URL: > http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm As there is no static library present now you must remove the Provides: libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} line :) And Ruben, sorry for barging in your territory :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070542.n475gH2t015155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-07 01:42:16 EDT --- -------REVIEW BOURNAL------- template: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines -------------- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK rpmlint clean -------------- MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK -------------- MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK -------------- MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK -------------- MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. N/A -------------- MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK -------------- MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK Package 3b15bd7fe8f33ac03c4fd0699551fc69 my DL 3b15bd7fe8f33ac03c4fd0699551fc69 -------------- MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK -------------- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK -------------- MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK -------------- MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A -------------- MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A -------------- MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK -------------- MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK -------------- MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK -------------- MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK -------------- MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK -------------- MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK -------------- MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK -------------- MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK -------------- MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A -------------- MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A -------------- MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A -------------- MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A -------------- MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A -------------- MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK -------------- MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK -------------- MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK -------------- MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK -------------- SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK -------------- SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK -------------- SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK -------------- SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. N/A -------------- SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A -------------- SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A -------------- SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb N/A -------------- SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. N/A ========== APPROVED ========== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 05:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 01:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] New: Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Summary: Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yyang at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- This is my first package, and I'm seeking a sponsor. Spec URL: http://pastebin.com/m43d4f5d4 SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1340062&name=saxpath-1.0-1.3.fc11.src.rpm Description: The SAXPath project is a Simple API for XPath. SAXPath is analogous to SAX in that the API abstracts away the details of parsing and provides a simple event based callback interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070601.n4761r4V018358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #1 from Yang Yong 2009-05-07 02:01:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342771) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342771) saxpath spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070631.n476Volc024244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Yang Yong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070630.n476UQdL023970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #14 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-07 02:30:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > Now /usr/lib/libmetalink.a is no longer packaged, I take it that's fine? > > > > Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1415019 > > SRPM URL: > > http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm > > As there is no static library present now you must remove the > Provides: libmetalink-static = %{version}-%{release} > line :) Ah yes, forgot about that :) Thanks for the help, both of you! Would it be possible to take a peek at my mulk packaging (bug 497948) once this one is finished? Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1415078 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/libmetalink/libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070651.n476ptKV025853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Bug 496525 depends on bug 496524, which changed state. Bug 496524 Summary: Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-07 02:51:54 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493527] Review Request: perl-PlRPC - Interface for building pServer Clients In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070653.n476rO1K027923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493527 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-07 02:53:23 EDT --- Chris: I'll be very thankful if this was in EPEL-5 as well. Could you please request an EL-5 branch (I'd gladly do that if you have a reason for not maintaining it there). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 06:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 02:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070658.n476w2er026961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-07 02:58:01 EDT --- Some of the non-versioned jars in /usr/lib/tritonus are copies not symlinks: -tritonus_share.jar -tritonus_core.jar -tritonus_gsm.jar -tritonus_remaining.jar Once this is fixed I'll do the formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070700.n4770FwC029240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219979] Review Request: perl-Text-ASCIITable - Create a nice formatted table using ASCII characters In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070711.n477Bvci029826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219979 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-07 03:11:55 EDT --- Chris: I'll be very thankful if this was in EPEL-5 as well. Could you please request an EL-5 branch (I'd gladly do that if you have a reason for not maintaining it there). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070710.n477AHY9031417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 03:10:05 EDT --- You're missing at least BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel. Doesn't build in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070712.n477CmiV032054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #19 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-07 03:12:46 EDT --- Petr: I'll be very thankful if this was in EPEL-5 as well. Could you please request an EL-5 branch (I'd gladly do that if you have a reason for not maintaining it there). Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:22:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:22:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070722.n477MUSx001509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070721.n477LCZx001368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 03:21:11 EDT --- Okay, after adding libjpeg-devel builds. However, the package uses its own versions of libmetalink and uri, which is not allowed. You have already packaged libmetalink; there isn't a package of uri yet. You need to make one and patch this package to use the packaged versions of libmetalink and uri. https://gna.org/projects/uri/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070722.n477MdAl032268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497800] Review Request: perl-Acme-PlayCode - Perl module for enhancement of code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070724.n477Osld032536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497800 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:39:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:39:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499169] Review Request: hunspell-cv - Chuvash hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070739.n477dtjI002879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499169 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 07:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 03:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070744.n477iuF9003811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:02:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:02:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070802.n4782wdY009495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 04:02:56 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070805.n4785e5m008769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-07 04:05:39 EDT --- Uh, I fixed it. What a messed up Makefile... Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/tritonus-0.3.7-0.2.20090419cvs.src.rpm Changelog: 0.3.7-0.2.20090419cvs - Fix duplicate files issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070803.n4783hrP008104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 04:03:42 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070804.n4784OkU008194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 04:04:23 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070816.n478GLGY012728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070830.n478Ugf5014140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-07 04:30:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1339067 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 1099adca419e0347d32198557854a2c1 morbid-0.8.6.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070855.n478tMbh018824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #20 from Petr Lautrbach 2009-05-07 04:55:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Net-Daemon New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: plautrba -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070855.n478tkAk021236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Petr Lautrbach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 08:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 04:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070858.n478w3mT021636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Bug 453861 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453861 depends on bug 453857, which changed state. Bug 453857 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-07 04:58:01 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070902.n4792Hrn020104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 05:02:15 EDT --- mb2md-3.20-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mb2md-3.20-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070904.n4794I9E022756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 453862 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453862 depends on bug 453854, which changed state. Bug 453854 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453862 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453862 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453862 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453862 depends on bug 453857, which changed state. Bug 453857 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-07 05:04:14 EDT --- Full review done. - rpmlint: globus-gsi-proxy-core-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340380 --------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gsi-proxy-core) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070903.n47937Qi020329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 05:03:06 EDT --- mb2md-3.20-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mb2md-3.20-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070911.n479B0Zs024164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-07 05:10:58 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gsi-proxy-core Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070942.n479gKld030333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Conrad Sanderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-05-07 05:42:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) spec and src rpm updated: http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.10-1.src.rpm Anyone out there ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 09:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 05:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905070945.n479jb0f031053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Conrad Sanderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://arma.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:01:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:01:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] New: Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Summary: Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mnowak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir.spec SRPM URL: http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The XDG Base Directory Specification defines where should user files be looked for by defining one or more base directories relative in with they should be located. This library implements functions to list the directories according to the specification and provides a few higher-level functions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071003.n47A3x9l002215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libxdg-basedir -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071003.n47A3eWh002176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-07 06:03:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > -------REVIEW BOURNAL------- It would ne bice to know which file was actually reviewed, because the spec above mentions 1.3-2, but the srpm is 1.3-1. The only thing that is different so the release, the rest of the spec is the same. Group "Applications/Internet" seems wrong to me, I'd rather use "Applications/Productivity" or "Applications/Text" > -------------- > MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another > package owns, then please present that at package review time. > OK FAIL. The package owns %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/, which it shouldn't, because it belongs to hicolor-icon-theme already is a requirement of this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071003.n47A3FRX032314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499579 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071006.n47A6vXi000746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #48 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-07 06:06:50 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm -- * Thu May 7 2009 Michal Nowak 3.3-0.1.rc1 - 3.3-rc1 Needs libxdg-basedir, see bug libxdg-basedir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071003.n47A3E04032282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |452427(awesome) --- Comment #1 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-07 06:03:13 EDT --- Scratch in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340407 Rpmlint output: newman at dhcp-lab-124 SPECS $ rpmlint /home/newman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/libxdg-basedir-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libxdg-basedir-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libxdg-basedir-devel-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/libxdg-basedir-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libxdg-basedir.spec libxdg-basedir.x86_64: W: no-documentation libxdg-basedir-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071011.n47ABsIS004175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-05-07 06:11:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-stasks Short Description: A plasmoid offering an alternate task-switcher. Owners: slankes Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071015.n47AFUJR004930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-07 06:15:29 EDT --- Also: - This rpm must update GTK icon cache: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache ? By the way, is this a GUI application? If not (i.e. if this is CUI application), installing destop files or hicolor icons is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:21:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:21:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472144] Review Request: tvbrowser - Free EPG for over 500 stations. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071021.n47ALQCG003754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472144 Bug 472144 depends on bug 475017, which changed state. Bug 475017 Summary: Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071021.n47ALOLe003707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-07 06:21:23 EDT --- Thanks. If any updates came on skinlf please let us know on tvbrowser review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 10:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 06:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071053.n47Aret7012658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-07 06:53:39 EDT --- Hi Xavier, I will deeply review it during today/tommorow. so far, rpmlint is ok. rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc10.noarch.rpm SPECS/php-pear-Text-Diff.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. and all other seems ok too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071100.n47B0qgT015506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07 07:00:50 EDT --- This is true, depsite It could have been handled with the rpm dependency extractor. (along with the pkgconfig provides). In Theory, when a .pc file is provided in /usr/lib64/pkgconfig it should already requires pkgconfig.x86_64 which is the only one to own such directory. At least this is what I would expect. Do we have corner case where this is known to produce issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071108.n47B8j8G016875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 07:08:44 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071108.n47B8oUt016907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 07:08:49 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071108.n47B8eiR014445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 07:08:39 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071137.n47Bb3t7020033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:37:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:37:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071137.n47BbErs020081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071135.n47BZlPV022682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071143.n47BhwAF021565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #3 from James Bowes 2009-05-07 07:43:57 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for the feedback, Jussi. The package now builds in mock under f10 and rawhide. I think the vendor and gconf bits are cleaned up, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 11:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 07:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491497] Review Request: dmapd - A server that provides DAAP and DPAP shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071153.n47BrBgY023389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491497 --- Comment #2 from W. Michael Petullo 2009-05-07 07:53:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd.spec SRPM URL: http://www.flyn.org/SRPMS/dmapd-0.0.10-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:10:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:10:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071210.n47CAJwm027380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 08:10:18 EDT --- - You don't need BR: python-setuptools on >F9. If you build for EPEL, then you need it, but you won't get the egg files without python-setuptools: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages - python spec file template has -O1 argument to install, maybe you should have it also? ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** No blockers; the package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071215.n47CFCDa001389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 08:15:10 EDT --- Chitlesh: are you reviewing the package and sponsoring Conrad? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071222.n47CMPCN002956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Armadillo - |Review Request: armadillo - |fast C++ matrix library |fast C++ matrix library |with interfaces to LAPACK |with interfaces to LAPACK |and ATLAS |and ATLAS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:19:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:19:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: Armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071219.n47CJTe0002072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 08:19:28 EDT --- A few notes: - gcc-c++, libstdc++-devel are not needed. First, BR libstdc++-devel is redundant since it's required by gcc-c++, second gcc-c++ is already in the standard kit installed in the buildroot: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Also blas-devel is unnecessary since it's pulled in by lapack-devel. - The section mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -r -p README.txt LICENSE.txt index.html examples docs_user docs_tech licenses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} is unnecessary. Just insert %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt index.html examples docs_user docs_tech licenses in the %files section of the main package. Also, note that if the documentation is large, it should be branched in its own package, which may be the case here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071226.n47CQA9p003897@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 08:26:09 EDT --- rpmlint output: gitg.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gitg.schemas 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - The same kind of warnings seem to be made by also other packages that have gconf schemas so this is probably OK to ignore. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSFIX - No mixing of %{buildroot} and RPM_BUILD_ROOT! MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Time stamps are not preserved, add INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add ChangeLog to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071231.n47CVm82004336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:30:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:30:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071230.n47CU3RH004564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-07 08:30:02 EDT --- Also, you should add %{?dist} to the Release: tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071233.n47CXowj004669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Bug 497339 depends on bug 497338, which changed state. Bug 497338 Summary: Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-07 08:33:48 EDT --- qmforge-2.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qmforge-2.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071238.n47CcLph005495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 Tarjei Knapstad changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tarjei.knapstad at gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Tarjei Knapstad 2009-05-07 08:38:16 EDT --- Could this be reopened? The latest Freemind release candidates (I've tried 0.9.0-RC3 and RC4) work just fine with the OpenJDK VM supplied with Fedora 10 (java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-15.b14.fc10.i386) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071249.n47CnEXT008145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-07 08:49:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Could this be reopened? The latest Freemind release candidates (I've tried > 0.9.0-RC3 and RC4) work just fine with the OpenJDK VM supplied with Fedora 10 > (java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-15.b14.fc10.i386) Please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071255.n47CtTou009320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2009-05-07 08:55:28 EDT --- Re: comment #9 I can help too (with review/sponsoring) if chitlesh isn't able. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 12:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071257.n47CvdXT010425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #63 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07 08:57:30 EDT --- About $ORIGIN, quoting songbird run script: --------- ## On Solaris we use $ORIGIN (set in RUNPATH) instead of LD_LIBRARY_PATH ## to locate shared libraries. -------- So the ORIGIN rpath seems only used on Solaris System Sorry for the late answear... I miss time. TODO List: review the xulrunner options. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 13:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071328.n47DSOlP017616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-07 09:28:23 EDT --- There is no automatic dependency on pkgconfig. The pkgconfigdeps.sh script only evaluates any .pc file's internal dependencies and adds corresponding "pkgconfig(foo)" RPM Requires/Provides. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 13:51:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:51:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071351.n47DpXmg022654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07 09:51:33 EDT --- This is right, and there is no isa dependency either. But after all, Fedora isn't a multiarch distro ( it is a multilibs), one could say that pkg-config.i386 shouldn't be provided within the x86_64 repository. And /usr/lib{64}/pkgconfig should be provided by the filesystem instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 13:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 09:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071357.n47Dvt7l024592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-07 09:57:54 EDT --- ========= REVOKED ========= the SRPM, i never take a look in the single SPEC-file mh, I'm in the shit. I didn't see the missing Icon-Cache and the incorrect ownage. The desktop file and the icon stuff is not needed and there are dependencies in the X. I have a CUI package with a desktop file, too.. So this wasn't a problem for me. Another thing is that the main dependency ccrypt is not available for ppc64. --- MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. FAIL! --- Group: yeah, you are right again. I'm awfully sorry for making such a trouble... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 14:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071440.n47EeUYH002898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-05-07 10:40:29 EDT --- No problem Jussi, the more the merrier :-) Will have a look at mulk as well. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 14:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071455.n47Etpe2005253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-07 10:55:50 EDT --- In F11 Rawhide I see automatic dependencies on /usr/bin/pkg-config - ouch! [One can only hope that createrepo has moved the Provides into the primary metadata, too.] pkgconfig.i386 is not published in the x86_64 repo. At least not in the F10 final tree and not in F11 Rawhide either. Without looking into it in detail, I can't tell what provides /usr/lib/pkgconfig for the 64-bit targets. If nothing did, it would be a broken dependency. By default, the old "Requires: pkgconfig" is fine. It's just 1) that some packagers start adding "Requires: %{_libdir}/pkgconfig" instead (see e.g. bug 484849), and 2) you need the arch-specific binary for multi-arch development, since pkgconfig looks in $libdir/pkgconfig ... so where $libdir=/usr/lib64, it doesn't look in /usr/lib/pkgconfig, does it? And if one would set $PKG_CONFIG_PATH, would it handle multilib $libdir correctly? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 15:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071502.n47F2jCj006695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-07 11:02:44 EDT --- At least openchange-devel includes %{_libdir}/pkgconfig -- going to file a bug now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 15:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071503.n47F3A5L006786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #22 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-05-07 11:03:07 EDT --- Ping once more. I will wait for a couple of weeks or otherwise close this review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 15:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071503.n47F3SSF008898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dbhole at redhat.com, | |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-07 11:03:26 EDT --- Spot: this package contains source files with the following in their header: http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/saxpath-license.txt What should be put in the license field in the .spec? ===================================================== Some preliminary questions and comments for Yang: - why are we shipping code that's been dead upstream for almost 5 years? This release is over 7 years old! - please add a URL for the POM file; is it acceptably licensed? - I think you're missing some Requires and Requires(pre), Requires(post) on jpackage-utils for the maven scripts - the maven example in the packaging guidelines uses org.apache.maven as the first argument to %add_to_maven_depmap but this package uses "saxpath". Should it be fully-qualified? - the license field will likely need to be updated. Spot can offer guidance here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 15:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 11:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071508.n47F8GOS008522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #23 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-07 11:08:15 EDT --- I'll open a new one in that case with a new spec. So feel free to close this review if the original reporter doesn't respond. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071604.n47G4xX8023989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-07 12:04:57 EDT --- Package Review ============== Package: Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [fab at laptop24 SRPMS]$ rpmlint python-zdaemon-2.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [fab at laptop24 noarch]$ rpmlint python-zdaemon-2.0.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable [x] Buildroot is correct master : %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) spec file: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license License type: ZPLv2.1 [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL Upstream source: 7d358297df480abe93b6565fc0213c34 Build source: 7d358297df480abe93b6565fc0213c34 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] Architecture independent packages have: BuildArch: noarch [!] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. %find_lang used for locales [x] %{optflags} or RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honoured [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required [x] %install starts with rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package must own all directories that it creates [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files [x] Permissions on files are set properly. %defattr(-,root,root,-) is in every %files section [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x] Package consistently uses macros [x] Package contains code, or permissable content [x] Included filenames are in UTF-8 [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required [-] Header files (.h) in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackage, if present [-] Static libraries (.a) in -static subpackage, if present [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [-] -debuginfo subpackage is present and looks complete [x] No pre-built binaries (.a, .so*, executable) [-] Package contains a properly installed .desktop file if it is a GUI application [-] Follows desktop entry spec [-] Valid .desktop Name [-] Valid .desktop GenericName [-] Valid .desktop Categories [-] Valid .desktop StartupNotify [-] .desktop file installed with desktop-file-install in %install === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [-] Timestamps preserved with cp and install [-] Uses parallel make (%{?_smp_mflags}) [x] Latest version is packaged [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available [?] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock Tested on: F10/i386 [!] Package should compile and build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures. Tested: hhttp://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340824 [?] Package functions as described [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct [-] File based requires are sane [x] Changelog in allowed format I guess that at the moment not all dependencies are available in F10, F11, and rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:05:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:05:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071605.n47G5ex4022042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |487097 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071605.n47G5dPi022010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |487098 --- Comment #6 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-07 12:05:38 EDT --- Adding dependency on the review request you filed for Djblets (bug 487098) since this specfile has a Requires on Djblets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:22:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071622.n47GMb1F028079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #64 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07 12:22:34 EDT --- songbird once first install wants to install fonts. On my system (F-11 installed from a customized livecd) Not all fonts are installed while running the first time license file. This make songbird to request bengali and other asian fonts (via packagekit) which aren't available while watching the license. Once the installation of the fonts is refused with PackageKit, gpk-update-icon crash with this possible indication: (songbird-bin:2333): PkGtkModule-DEBUG: InstallFontconfRessources method invoked. In my opinion, there is a problem both with the license advertising and the installation of recommended plugins. That's rather annoying for a newly created users to have all sort of advertising, specially if the user known well the sunbird license and/or other well known modules. I think that previously, the same kind of problem was raised with firefox which ends to have a less "interactive with end-user" advertise. (I remember some discussion on GPL not been an EULA that end-user need to accept/reject to use the software but a pure information). The problem about recommended modules is that: in a ideal packagekit world, they should be provided in an safer way (trusted gpg signed package, such as rpm or whatever, from trusted repositories). But since our firefox package doesn't prevent installation of such extension as end-users level, i think it should be perfectly fine. So to sum-up, I would appreciate to have less interactive information on newly created user (so songbird could be usable directly). But this shouldn't prevent this package to be approved. @David Halik, Usually, in order for you to be sponsored, you need to provide a second review, this review was rather big, so this could be optional but remains at the discretion of the sponsort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071656.n47GurUu002686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #20 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-07 12:56:50 EDT --- Sorry, You have to install blender and TuxRender first. If you run blender after install both packages the ~/.blener/script directory and all symlinks will been created. I have taken a look on my installation and could found the Texblender export menu entry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071657.n47Gvtvw002896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226322, which changed state. Bug 226322 Summary: Merge Review: psmisc https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226322] Merge Review: psmisc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071657.n47GvsGo002867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226322 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-07 12:57:52 EDT --- I'm happy. Commit. APPROVED. Thanks everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 16:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 12:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071659.n47GxdlJ000582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-07 12:59:37 EDT --- Now I approve this package. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (ucommon) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 17:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071704.n47H4WS7001630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #21 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-07 13:04:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Sorry, You have to install blender and TuxRender first. > > If you run blender after install both packages the ~/.blener/script directory > and all symlinks will been created. Right, and that's "the" problem... What upstream think about that ? Of course, most blender plugin extensions will be installed next to blender is run. the blender plugin directory isn't meant to be used only by blender, but plugins such as LuxRender should be allowed to store per-user configuration files... > I have taken a look on my installation and could found the Texblender export > menu entry. right but once blender is first run when LuxRender was previously installed... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 17:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071732.n47HWnY9010300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #1 from Bryson Lee 2009-05-07 13:32:48 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm I updated the specfile to include the --disable-threads command-line option for the configure step. This eliminates a warning from configure when the extension is built against the stock tcl-devel, which disables threading due to fork() problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 17:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071754.n47HsmSh014350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #22 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-07 13:54:46 EDT --- Good: + Base name of the SPEC files matches with package name. + Package name fits with the naming convention * URI tag shows on proper project homepage * Could downloads sources with spectool -g + Sources in Source package matches with upstream (md5sum: 02174b85917b68ac5f681a4f117b7bd LuxRender_v05_Source.zip 7cb0920c7c77ebaa5d7a721be124a27f LuxBlend_v05_Blender_Exporter.zip) * Package contains several subpackage + Package contains valid license tag + License Tag contains GPLv3+ and BSD as valid OpenSource licenses + Upstream sources contains verbatins copy of the licenses + License note in source files seems to mach license tag + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Proper BuildRoot tag + Buildroot will be cleaned on the start of %install and %clean + Rpmlint is silent on source RPM. + RPM_OPT_FLAGS will honoured. + Debuginfo package contains sources + Koji scratch build works fine. * Local build works fine. * Local install and uninstall works fine. + Start of the application works fine + Menu entry is ok + %files stanza contains no duplicates + Package contains proper %Changelog entries TODO - Please set blender requirement to bleder >= 2.48a-21 to make sure, that the script are available in a corret was. - Why you add an Req rom the devel-docs package to the main Package. - Please moveove content of the %doc stanza of the libs subpackage to the main package - Rpmlint complaints on binary RPMs: pmlint LuxRender-* LuxRender.x86_64: W: no-documentation LuxRender-blender.x86_64: W: no-documentation LuxRender-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py "BPY" OK.: Blender specific LuxRender-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py 0644 Should be fixed. LuxRender-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py Should be fixed. LuxRender-core.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK. LuxRender-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation OK. LuxRender-lib.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/liblux.so.1.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 May be OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 17:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 13:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071758.n47Hw88T013083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #23 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-07 13:58:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > Sorry, You have to install blender and TuxRender first. > > > > If you run blender after install both packages the ~/.blener/script directory > > and all symlinks will been created. > Right, and that's "the" problem... What upstream think about that ? Which upstream? > Of course, most blender plugin extensions will be installed next to blender is > run. the blender plugin directory isn't meant to be used only by blender, but > plugins such as LuxRender should be allowed to store per-user configuration > files... ??? > > > I have taken a look on my installation and could found the Texblender export > > menu entry. > right but once blender is first run when LuxRender was previously installed... Yes, Yout must install LuxRender first, before you can see this entries. What is your issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 18:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 14:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071829.n47ITlZN023959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-07 14:29:45 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342909) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342909) rpmlint on x86_64 (after fixing rpath and so on) For 0.5.4-1: * BR - "BR: pkgconfig" is not needed because ucommon-devel has "Requiers: pkgconfig" (Note that any packages containing pkgconfig .pc file should have "Requires: pkgconfig") - By the way would you check if some version specific dependency for BuildRequires (not Requires) is really needed? * Internal dependency - Is it safe that sipwitch-snmp subpackage does not depend on sipwitch? * Patch0 vs %patch - On rawhide %patch is rejected when you use "Patch0:". You should use "Patch: <-> %patch" or "Patch0: <-> %patch0". * rpath Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath - On x86_64 the rebuilt binaries have unneeded rpath: ------------------------------------------------------------- sipwitch-plugin-forward.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/sipwitch/forward.so ['/usr/lib64'] sipwitch-plugin-rtpproxy.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/sipwitch/rtpproxy.so ['/usr/lib64'] sipwitch-plugin-scripting.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/sipwitch/scripting.so ['/usr/lib64'] sipwitch-plugin-subscriber.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/sipwitch/subscriber.so ['/usr/lib64'] sipwitch-plugin-zeroconf.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/sipwitch/zeroconf.so ['/usr/lib64'] ------------------------------------------------------------- Fedora requests to remove these rpaths. This can be removed by the below (I usually do the following) ------------------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q %patch -p0 sed -i.rpath -e \ '/sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec/s|/usr/lib |/usr/lib /usr/lib64 /lib /lib64 |' \ configure .... .... %build .... %configure \ .... ------------------------------------------------------------- (note that the way recommended in the wiki often breaks linkage against libraries rebuilt from the same source) * stripping binaries - Some of the binaries are stripped: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1660 DEBUG: + /usr/bin/make DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.1.fc11.x86_64 'INSTALL=install -p' swig-python ..... 1685 DEBUG: g++ -pthread -shared -lc -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-long-long -fexceptions -DNEW_STDCPP -pthread -fno-check-new -finline -fvisibility=hidden -DUCOMMON_VISIBILITY=1 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4/inc -I/builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4 build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.6/wrapper.o -L/usr/lib64 -lpython2.6 -lucommon -o _sipwitch.so 1686 DEBUG: /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4/autoconf/install-sh -d /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.1.fc11.x86_64`python -c 'from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()'` 1687 DEBUG: /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4/autoconf/install-sh -d /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.1.fc11.x86_64`python -c 'from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib(1)'` 1688 DEBUG: strip _sipwitch.so ..... 1692 DEBUG: + /usr/bin/make DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.1.fc11.x86_64 'INSTALL=install -p' swig-php5 1698 DEBUG: g++ -shared -module -shared -avoid-version -o sipwitch.so wrapper.o -lucommon -lc 1699 DEBUG: /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4/autoconf/install-sh -d /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.1.fc11.x86_64`php-config --extension-dir` 1700 DEBUG: strip sipwitch.so ------------------------------------------------------------- To create debuginfo rpm correctly, binaries must not be stripped before %install ends. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo For this package, the following will prevent this strip: ------------------------------------------------------------- %build export STRIP=/bin/true %configure --with-pkg-config --disable-static %{__make} %{?_smp_mflags} ------------------------------------------------------------- * Automated autotools call - At some point autotools are automatically called after configure -> make is executed: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1660 DEBUG: + /usr/bin/make DESTDIR=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/sipwitch-0.5.4-1.1.fc11.x86_64 'INSTALL=install -p' swig-python 1661 DEBUG: (cd swig ; make python-swig) 1662 DEBUG: make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4/swig' 1663 DEBUG: cd .. && /bin/sh /builddir/build/BUILD/sipwitch-0.5.4/autoconf/missing --run automake-1.10 --gnu swig/Makefile 1664 DEBUG: cd .. && /bin/sh ./config.status swig/Makefile 1665 DEBUG: config.status: creating swig/Makefile ------------------------------------------------------------- This modifies autotools-generated files and this must be done before configure/make is executed. For this package, this is because your patch modifies only swig/Makefile.am but does not modify swig/Makefile.in. Solution: - Patch against swig/Makefile.in, not against swig/Makefile.am This is recommended to avoid unneeded autotools call. - If you want to call autotools anyway, explicitly call autotools before configure/make is executed. However this is not recommended and should be avoided when possible. * %config(noreplace) - Would you explain why %{_sysconfdir}/logrotate.d/sipwitch is not marked as (noreplace)? * rpmlint issue See attached: ! Note that "sipwitch.src:151: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib" is because of rpath fix suggested above and this can be ignored. - If %{python_sitelib}/sipwitch.py is to be executed directly from users, then this script should have 0755 permission. Otherwise the shebang on this script should be removed. * Macros - For the directory where php binary modules are installed, please use %php_extdir macro. This macro is defined in /etc/rpm/macros.php in php-devel. * Initscripts convention Again please check: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript - Initscript must be installed under %_initrddir (/etc/rc.d/init.d, and please use this macro), not %_sysconfdir/init.d. - Some proper Requires(post) or so and scriptlets are needed. Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 19:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 15:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905071905.n47J5EWU028579@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-07 15:05:13 EDT --- Too late now, however did you see this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 20:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072021.n47KL6lm011848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 Kai Engert (kaie) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kengert at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from Kai Engert (kaie) 2009-05-07 16:21:03 EDT --- Jon, you said your build initially failed, but then it worked. What local changes did you apply to make it work? Do you have a patch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 20:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072026.n47KQgGl016309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-07 16:26:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Please specify prototyping behavior for Guestfs.xs (see perlxs manual) > > Is it worth addressing the "please specify..." part? This is fixed by this commit: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=672c4ba257924c3e64836c08fb3b55bc4a6b2aba (In reply to comment #11) > In src/guestfs.c, you probably want to use a read wrapper > so you don't have to worry about EINTR and EAGAIN > (the code should retry, not fail in those cases). > It looks like there are a few others that would benefit. This should fix it: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=bb349b05333aa5bf87a3882f15458d8f7341d807 (In reply to comment #12) > Please use an unsigned type for length-only variables like "len" here: This change isn't exhaustive by any means, but it fixes some of these problems: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=dd8b152da0e899104fec305159640d08d7d6cdd9 (In reply to comment #13) > This realloc (from guestfsd.c) leaks upon failure: http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=libguestfs.git;a=commitdiff;h=427b5f079fd344919ecf568bab2084825aacf606 (In reply to comment #15) > Since "make check" doesn't pass for me, I haven't yet tried running things > under valgrind. Have you? No I haven't run it under valgrind, but obviously I should! I've not seen the 'make check' error that we discussed on IRC, and as you know I've tried to reproduce your setup quite closely. I've now built libguestfs on RHEL 5 too, which has quite a few differences from Fedora 11. Again, not seen that problem in 'make check' ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 20:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072050.n47Ko0Rm020120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dmalcolm at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-07 16:49:58 EDT --- Should the package be named "python-djblets", rather than djblets/Djblets? See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 I've taken the liberty of making an updated version of the package that renames it, fixes a few other issues, plus bumps to the latest upstream release (0.5rc1). Hope that's ok. Specfile is here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-djblets.spec SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-djblets-0.5-0.1.rc1.src.rpm Both RPM and SRPM are clean when run through rpmlint (rpmlint-0.82-3.el5); (Caveat: I did this on a RHEL5 box, rather than Fedora) Re comment #2: I didn't reformat Ramez' changelog entry, thinking it better to preserve history. rpmlint doesn't seem to complain about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 20:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 16:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072055.n47Kt8ww021592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-07 16:55:07 EDT --- New upstream version: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/libguestfs-1.0.20-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji scratch build of the above: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1341246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] New: Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Summary: Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack-keyboard.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack-keyboard-2.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: jack-keyboard is a virtual MIDI keyboard - a program that allows you to send JACK MIDI events using your PC keyboard. It's somewhat similar to vkeybd, except it uses JACK MIDI instead of ALSA, and the default keyboard mapping is much better - it uses the same layout as trackers (like Impulse Tracker) did, so you have two and half octaves under your fingers. rpmlint is silent. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1341298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072125.n47LPVZb027064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #11 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-07 17:25:30 EDT --- since firebird is there now : builds are ok for F-10 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1341293 but can you help me to find why it failed for Epel ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1341334&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072136.n47LaS8M029116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #3 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-07 17:36:27 EDT --- can you explain me what is wrong there ? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1341339&name=build.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072134.n47LYoLJ028593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #13 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-07 17:34:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Chitlesh: are you reviewing the package and sponsoring Conrad? Yes, today I've assigned this bug under my name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072153.n47LrVJg031810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #14 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-07 17:53:30 EDT --- #1 (In reply to comment #10) > - Also blas-devel is unnecessary since it's pulled in by lapack-devel. Conrad, here blas-devel is already required by lapack-devel, you can verify this with chitlesh $ rpm -qR lapack-devel blas-devel = 3.1.1-4.fc10 <----------- here it is lapack = 3.1.1-4.fc10 liblapack.so.3 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 Hence, if it is not important to add it in the spec file. For your next package, use this "rpm -qR XXXX" command to verify where you have unnecessary added redundant dependencies. #2 verify your rpms there is a package caled "rpmlint". It helps you verify the quality of your rpms. Try rpmlint -i XXXX.rpm for each generated rpms before uploading for review. Any warning or errors should be corrected. The solutions of some common rpmlint warnings are listed on the fedora wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 21:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 17:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072155.n47Ltf7U032356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #7 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-07 17:55:40 EDT --- I've taken Dan's work on top of Ramez's, updated it to the latest release candidate, and fixed some issues. I renamed the "Djblets" dependency to "python-djblets" to reflect the change I proposed in bug 487098. Hope this is all OK. Updated specfile is here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/ReviewBoard.spec Updated SRPM is here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/ReviewBoard-1.0-0.4.rc1.src.rpm Output from rpmlint is clean on the SRPM, and on the built RPM gives the output: ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/post-lock.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/pre-lock.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/contrib/tools/post-commit 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/post-unlock.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/post-revprop-change.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/start-commit.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/pre-commit.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/contrib/conf/reviewboard.fcgi.in 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/diffviewer/testdata/new_src/foo.c ReviewBoard.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/db/write-lock ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/post-commit.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/pre-unlock.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/scmtools/testdata/svn_repo/hooks/pre-revprop-change.tmpl 0644 ReviewBoard.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/reviewboard/diffviewer/testdata/orig_src/foo.c These appear to all be example files or test data, and thus I don't think they're real problems. Caveat: I'm doing this all on a RHEL5 box, rather than specifically Fedora. How's this looking? Ramez, do you still want to own this package? Dan? I'd be happy to co-maintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 22:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 18:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072203.n47M3EUD029008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-07 18:03:13 EDT --- This Koji scratch build enables the tests: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1341318 (still building as I write ...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 22:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 18:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483859] Review Request: libg3d - Library for 3D file/object viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072222.n47MMK6F032044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483859 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-07 18:22:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmmm, I guess that I will need some help with this package. Hi Fabian, as suggest by Ed, just add the following two lines to your %configure section to fix the errors reported by rpmlint: %configure sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool As an additional note, check the %doc definitions: just the README file should be enough for -devel package, instead of installing the same files for both main and -devel packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 22:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 18:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] New: Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Summary: Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unoconv.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/unoconv-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: unoconv converts between any document format that OpenOffice understands. It uses OpenOffice.org's UNO bindings for non-interactive conversion of documents. Supported document formats include Open Document Format (.odf), MS Word (.doc), MS Office Open/MS OOXML (.xml), Portable Document Format (.pdf), HTML, XHTML, RTF, Docbook (.xml), and more. rpmlint is silent -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 23:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072314.n47NE1vk007899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-05-07 19:14:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-IDNA_Convert Short Description: Internationalied domain name to UTF-8 converter Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 23:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072326.n47NQsaA010080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 7 23:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 19:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905072330.n47NUqVe016195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-07 19:30:51 EDT --- Hi Bryson, this is just an informal review, because i'm not a sponsored reviewer yet. OK - rpmlint 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} NEEDSWORK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - use %global instead of %define NEEDSWORK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - include the file license.terms in %doc NEEDSWORK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun - add ldconfig calls OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342406 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ddbd09e2e39e2efa4155981317ec5394 tcl-snmptools-1.0.tar.gz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NA - Packages containing GUI applications must include a .desktop file (no gui) OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 Hope that helps, regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 00:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080000.n4800vXt020354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arthurg.work at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from arthurguru 2009-05-07 20:00:56 EDT --- Yanko, Here is my informal review of package mysqludf_xql One issue I couldn't determine either way is whether this should be a -devel package or not. MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.src.rpm OK - mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-6.fc10.i386.rpm OK - mysqludf_xql-debuginfo-0.9.7-6.fc10.i386.rpm OK - OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source - ac690468d8303ea5e09fcf7d29326b22 *lib_mysqludf_xql-0.9.7.tar.gz (RPM) - ac690468d8303ea5e09fcf7d29326b22 *lib_mysqludf_xql-0.9.7.tar.gz (upstream) - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK (i386) MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK, no locales available MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - OK, no relocatable package MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no suffixed library files. MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK if not -devel package, otherwise %{name} = %{version}-%{release} is not specified. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la files MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, no gui available MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK SHOULD - All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment - Not Ok, No comment provided. Conclusion: It's hard to say whether SQL queries are a devel activity or not, if a not a devel package then this package has passed my review. Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 00:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080004.n4804KGD015464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #17 from arthurguru 2009-05-07 20:04:18 EDT --- QA, Just did an informal review on the following package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Kind Regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 00:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499755] New: Review Request: kde-colorscheme-plastik - Plastik KDE 4 Color Scheme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-colorscheme-plastik - Plastik KDE 4 Color Scheme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499755 Summary: Review Request: kde-colorscheme-plastik - Plastik KDE 4 Color Scheme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekcejk at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kde-colorscheme-plastik/kde-colorscheme-plastik.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kde-colorscheme-plastik/kde-colorscheme-plastik-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package contains the KDE 4 port of KDE 3 Plastik color scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 00:11:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477949] Review Request: perl-Term-Highlight - Simple way to highlight perl-compatible regexp patterns on terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080011.n480B3x4016703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477949 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-07 20:11:01 EDT --- Hello Alexey, that's a very useful tool in my opinion. You could tidy the spec a bit by defining: %global realname Term-Highlight and then: Name: perl-%{realname} Source: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/R/RA/RADKOV/%{realname}-%{version}.tar.gz and so on along the file The License tag should report the GPL version (GPLv2 or GPLv2+, not GPL nor GPL+). Moreover, as you seem to be the package author, you could kindly add in the source archive, and in %doc, the COPYING file containing the license text. Hope that helps, cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 00:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080033.n480XRp0020116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #3 from Bryson Lee 2009-05-07 20:33:26 EDT --- Hi Guido, thanks for the review! Spec URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools-1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm > - use %global instead of %define Corrected. > - include the file license.terms in %doc Corrected. > - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag Corrected to "CMU and GPLv3+". > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > - add ldconfig calls Although the guidelines don't say so explicitly, I don't think it makes sense to apply this requirement to shareables that are extension modules for interpreted languages like TCL, since the code isn't activated by ld itself, but rather by the interpreter (e.g. /usr/bin/tclsh) with calls to dlopen(). This specfile was based on an existing Fedora 10 specfile for the tcl-zlib extension, which does not perform ldconfig calls, either. Best regards, Bryson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 00:39:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:39:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499755] Review Request: kde-colorscheme-plastik - Plastik KDE 4 Color Scheme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080039.n480dkT7026197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499755 --- Comment #1 from nucleo 2009-05-07 20:39:46 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342462 $ rpmlint kde-colorscheme-plastik-0.1.1-1.fc12.noarch.rpm kde-colorscheme-plastik-0.1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 01:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 21:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080113.n481DZZJ031421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-07 21:13:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > One issue I couldn't determine either way is whether this should be a -devel > package or not. I don't think its a -devel package. Its more like a mysql plugin, which is a runtime, not a devel thing. > SHOULD - All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment > - Not Ok, No comment provided. Redid it without patching. * Fri May 8 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.9.7-7 - avoid patching and reconfiguring http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-7.fc10.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 02:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080200.n4820o4l001180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-07 22:00:49 EDT --- Ok looks good to me now. I think I forgot to mention yesterday that I was also thinking we should only ship this on archs with ghc. (In principle we might also want arch specific macros (eg to work around ppc breakage for example;) at some point.) So I am inclined to do -BuildArch: noarch +# fedora ghc archs: +ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} x86_64 ppc alpha for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 02:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 22:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080210.n482A9w9007878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #15 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-05-07 22:10:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > A few notes: > > - gcc-c++, libstdc++-devel are not needed. Thanks -- I've removed the explicit build dependencies. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 Based on rpm -qR, boost-devel doesn't pull in libstdc++-devel. Armadillo header files certainly need the header files provided by libstdc++-devel, and I'd assume boost-devel would also. As such, should there be a dependency on libstdc++-devel in the -devel package? The packaging guidelines only state that gcc-c++ (and hence libstdc++-devel) can be assumed to exist for "BuildRequires". Is this also the case for the "Requires" section ? > Just insert > %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt ... in the %files section of the main package. I've adapted this as follows: %files ... %doc LICENSE.txt licenses %files devel ... %doc README.txt index.html examples docs_user docs_tech The reasoning is that the licensing applies whether or not the header files are present. "README.txt" and "index.html" refer to files which are only present when both the base and -devel package are installed (due to the layout in the original .tar.gz archive). > Also, note that if the documentation is large, it should be > branched in its own package, which may be the case here. I'd prefer to keep it in the -devel package to keep thing simpler, and hence less error prone. (I'd also prefer not to go overboard in splitting packages like Debian does). The documentation goes hand in hand when one does development using this library, so I'm not sure if the added complexity and effort of an extra doc package is worth it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 03:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 23:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080339.n483daxl018757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-07 23:39:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=342976) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=342976) ghc-rpm-macros-4.patch Need %setup to actually build within a dir (ie when overriding ~/rpmbuild/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:00:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:00:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080400.n4840oS5027341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 00:00:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Too late now, however did you see this? > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=302271 can you brief what's too late and what should I see in bug302271? I also see review 302261 is completed state. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080424.n484O5QY030861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-08 00:24:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Too late now, however did you see this? Yes - thanks for the hint to make separate html2wiki sub-package ;) I figured you weren't interested in this anymore since you never re-opened it after finally getting to import perl-CSS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This DBIx::Class component can be used to automatically encode a column's contents whenever the value of that column is set. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342596 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 04:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 00:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080455.n484tFpO003520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-08 00:55:14 EDT --- Note that I've explicitly disabled this package's support for Crypt::OpenPGP. Crypt::OpenPGP requires Crypt::Twofish (Artistic license only - upstream hasn't responded to my request to relicense yet) and Crypt::RIPEMD160 (probably unacceptable in Fedora - original C source code has a bad indemnification clause; see RHBZ #452453). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080503.n4853QoT032349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 01:03:25 EDT --- Build failed for ppc64 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342627 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:07:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:07:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080507.n48573Bu005263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080541.n485fsGj006054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-08 01:41:54 EDT --- Any suggestions how to fix it? I don't know assembler. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080541.n485fvex006081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 01:41:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1340028 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3ffe00e0c9c55ecbf3f528188d84d957e3dcd7f6 yawp-0.2.3.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + desktop file installed correctly. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc12.i586 Provides: plasma_yawp.so Requires: libQtCore.so.4 libQtDBus.so.4 libQtGui.so.4 libQtNetwork.so.4 libQtSvg.so.4 libQtXml.so.4 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgcc_s.so.1 libkdecore.so.5 libkdeui.so.5 libkio.so.5 libm.so.6 libplasma.so.3 libpthread.so.0 libsolid.so.4 libstdc++.so.6 libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080550.n485oNOr012113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080548.n485mhZx011591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-08 01:48:43 EDT --- Thanks a lot Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kde-plasma-yawp Short Description: Yet Another Weather Plasmoid Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 05:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 01:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080549.n485nraR006996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 01:49:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1341298 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 030a666f1703ef1ab3eae6004cb04a9a jack-keyboard-2.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + Icon Cache scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. Suggestions: 1) change Generic name to GenericName=Virtual MIDI Keyboard" 2) you can add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 06:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 02:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080606.n4866uam014977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 06:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 02:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080605.n4865jbv014774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-08 02:05:45 EDT --- Again, Thank you for the review Parag! Also thanks for the suggestions. I will do that change on the GenericName. The hicolor-icon-theme dependency is satisfied through gtk2 and it won't break. I'd like to keep things minimal. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jack-keyboard Short Description: Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 06:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 02:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080626.n486QOkx013197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #23 from srinivas 2009-05-08 02:26:22 EDT --- Setting fedora-review flag to "+". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 06:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 02:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080637.n486bHGw020002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-08 02:37:16 EDT --- It should be noted that the mysql version (5.1.x) in devel/F11 seems to require these extension libs in a specific location %{_libdir}/mysql/plugin/ and does not work if the library is only in the system linker path. This submission remains on the stable branch for now. * Fri May 8 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.9.7-8 - use a define for the plugin location, it changes from mysql 5.0 [F10] to 5.1 [F11] http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:01:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:01:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080701.n48714M3019095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nushio at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #31 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-08 03:01:00 EDT --- Juan Manuel: ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473037] Review Request: tinycc - Tiny C Compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080712.n487CvFl026093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473037 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #29 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-08 03:12:53 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:29:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080729.n487TJJ6023437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rlandman at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(eric at christensenp | |lace.us) --- Comment #75 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-08 03:29:15 EDT --- Eric, Mike, Josh, Ryan, Rueddi, et al: can you please test the package in comment 74 to make sure it works for you so we can move forward with getting the fedora publican upstream into publican, thanks! It should be a drop in replacement for current publican-0.45 just with added fedora support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080738.n487cglT030007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 03:38:41 EDT --- its because its looking into atomic/lffifoIntel.c on ppc64 whereas it should look into atomic/lffifoppc.c -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080757.n487vwci027953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 --- Comment #24 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-05-08 03:57:56 EDT --- Please, feel free to take over this package from me, I don't use dansguardian any longer and I don't have much time to maintain it. Sorry :-( You could reassign this bug to yourself rather than opening a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 07:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 03:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080759.n487xwUK001103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 03:59:57 EDT --- qmforge-2.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qmforge-2.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:04:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:04:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080804.n4884wnv029459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-08 04:04:57 EDT --- Did you actually get this to work? I updated the spec too to fix the packaging stuff, but was unable to do anything with unoconv, so I didn't submit the package for review.. For me it fails every time with the error: Error: Unable to connect or start own listener. Aborting. Funny, now that I tried it again it failed the first time but then worked after that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080814.n488EwnG004018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #18 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-08 04:14:56 EDT --- Arthur: The review seems mostly ok. Please ensure you understand which packages are considered -devel (feel free to ask if the guidelines are unclear to you). Please add yourself to to "packager" group in the account system, I'll sponsor your account. It would also be awesome if you could do a couple more reviews, there's always something in the queue, and getting more familiar with RPM packaging won't hurt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:21:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:21:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080821.n488LNss032422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-08 04:21:22 EDT --- Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just a shared object. rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la} Why do you call a recursive rm here? Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing --disable-static to configure? Also, please do some informal reviews to prove you're familiar with the packaging guidelines so that your account can get sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080825.n488Pach006193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 04:25:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342596 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7a3406a936c7e224db0d85bda1e42de80e27dbfb DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=27, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.51 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.60 CPU) + Package perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(DBIx::Class::EncodedColumn) = 0.00002 perl(DBIx::Class::EncodedColumn::Crypt::Eksblowfish::Bcrypt) = 0.00001 perl(DBIx::Class::EncodedColumn::Digest) = 0.00001 Requires: perl(Crypt::Eksblowfish::Bcrypt) perl(Digest) perl(Sub::Name) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080829.n488TKRr001021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #20 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-08 04:29:19 EDT --- Hi Rich, Those changes all look fine. Thanks. I've switched "fedora-review" to "+". BTW, there are a couple of nits in http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1341247&name=build.log: Makefile:1097: warning: overriding commands for target `make-initramfs.sh' Makefile:400: warning: ignoring old commands for target `make-initramfs.sh' ... mv initramfs.fedora-12.x86_64.img initramfs.fedora-12.x86_64.img.bak ... mv: cannot stat `initramfs.fedora-12.x86_64.img': No such file or directory make[2]: [initramfs/fakeroot.log] Error 1 (ignored) mv vmlinuz.fedora-12.x86_64 vmlinuz.fedora-12.x86_64.bak mv: cannot stat `vmlinuz.fedora-12.x86_64': No such file or directory ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:36:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:36:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080836.n488aGn0007958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080835.n488ZqYV007914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-08 04:35:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: febootstrap New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080833.n488XV9a007381@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-08 04:33:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libguestfs Short Description: Access and modify virtual machine disk images Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080845.n488jYMW009687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-08 04:45:34 EDT --- Your application is arch-specific , that means that it will be installed in %{python_sitearch}, not in %{python_sitelib}. Just change %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info to %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ %{python_sitearch}/%{name}-%{version}-py*.egg-info -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080848.n488mtct004315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-08 04:48:54 EDT --- Regarding spec-file, I see the following issues: * use full path in Source0. * apply patch with saving original file with some descriptive suffix, e.g. change %patch0 to %patch0 -b .some_descriptive_suffix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:52:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:52:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080852.n488qbhb005064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jim Meyering 2009-05-08 04:52:04 EDT --- I've just fedora-review to + again. third time, now, after two mid-air-collisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 08:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 04:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080853.n488rWRW010756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-08 04:53:31 EDT --- Please, don't raise fedora-review flags for packages submitted by you (this is a reviewer's work, not submitter's). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 09:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 05:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470909] Review Request: wt - C++ library and application server for developing web applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080913.n489Dn7s008385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470909 --- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-05-08 05:13:45 EDT --- SPEC URI: http://github.com/binaryhelix/specs/blob/ab62573a7843d1552daba06883ac52bd08dc6e49/wt/wt.spec SRPM URI: http://fedorapeople.org/~arbiter/wt/wt-2.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm * Fri May 8 2009 Lorenzo Villani - 2.2.3-2 - Require dependencies in -devel subpackage - Drop redundant declarations in %%files - Add -doc subpackage - Fix License tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 09:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 05:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905080950.n489o2NZ020056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #13 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-08 05:50:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Please, don't raise fedora-review flags for packages submitted by you (this is > a reviewer's work, not submitter's). oups sorry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 10:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 06:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081013.n48ADcgw018816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #6 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-08 06:13:36 EDT --- Thanks That better now ;) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342831 Updated : Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/kinterbasdb.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 11:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 07:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494852] Review Request: astronomy-backgrounds - Astronomy backgrounds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081139.n48Bdhn5005361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494852 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-08 07:39:42 EDT --- This package was completely broken. Poor/rushed review. :( None of the background images was installed correctly. All were copied to the same file with the name of the target directory instead. xml index file was installed as a directory, which created a conflict with all other background packages (bug 496905). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 12:07:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 08:07:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081207.n48C7DLb005390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Matt Domsch 2009-05-08 08:07:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gpxe Short Description: A network boot loader Owners: mdomsch glommer Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 12:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 08:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081206.n48C6c9A005272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-08 08:06:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just a > shared object. Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig): # service mysqld start Starting MySQL: [ OK ] [root at f10test ~]# rpm -Uhv /home/rpmbuild/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-8.fc10.i386.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:mysqludf_xql ########################################### [100%] [root at f10test ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS STRING SONAME "lib_mysqludf_xql.so";' ERROR 1126 (HY000) at line 1: Can't open shared library 'lib_mysqludf_xql.so' (errno: 22 lib_mysqludf_xql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) [root at f10test ~]# ldconfig [root at f10test ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS STRING SONAME "lib_mysqludf_xql.so";' [root at f10test ~]# > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la} > Why do you call a recursive rm here? Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r can be removed. > Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing > --disable-static to configure? not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage. error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 12:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 08:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081253.n48CrZkr013464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-05-08 08:53:34 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint unoconv.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/unoconv-0.3-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/unoconv-0.3-3.fc10.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv2 in both the COPYING file and the unoconv file OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Spec file indicates GPLv2 OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum unoconv-0.3.tar.bz2* e6b33a2041137d8ebae1b71396ec0641 unoconv-0.3.tar.bz2 e6b33a2041137d8ebae1b71396ec0641 unoconv-0.3.tar.bz2.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1342449 NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. NA: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. (no real build) NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226204] Merge Review: nss In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081306.n48D64d5020732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226204 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-08 09:06:01 EDT --- All I did in each case was attempt to build the latest rawhide koji srpm. This changed from 2008-09-19 to 2008-12-05. Something in that interval corrected whatever the problem was. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081308.n48D8IiR016411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-05-08 09:08:17 EDT --- This seems to work fine as long as OO.o has an instance started. I tried without an instance started and it failed (though the man page states that it will instantiate a session) I think the problem arose from OO.o, as when I manually launched it left me waiting for user interaction due to wanting to recover files. However after closing OO.o cleanly it started a session and performed the conversion without problem. Seems to work per the docs. Package APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081323.n48DNKTv023965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-08 09:23:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn Short Description: Automatically encode columns Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081355.n48DtFOY030386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:55:13 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-usage-1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:55:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081355.n48DtOki030476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:55:22 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:55:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:55:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081355.n48DtJRa030424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:55:18 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081355.n48DtC4a030273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:55:10 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081355.n48Dt9kD030235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:55:08 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:59:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:59:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081359.n48DxrV9031044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:59:52 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 13:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 09:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081359.n48DxmA3026150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 09:59:47 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 15:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499857] New: Review Request: python-pefile - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499857 Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile-1.2.10_63-1.src.rpm Description: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 15:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499859] New: Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Summary: Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-pefile-1.2.10_63-1.src.rpm Description: pefile is a platform-independent Python module for reading and working with Portable Executable (aka PE) files, most commonly known as .exe and .dll files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 15:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] New: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Summary: Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module combines WWW::Mechanize and HTML::TreeBuilder. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343426 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 15:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081545.n48FjAIX016935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-08 11:45:08 EDT --- *** Bug 499857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 15:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 11:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499857] Review Request: python-pefile - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081545.n48Fj9SM016910@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499857 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-08 11:45:08 EDT --- (hit Enter by mistake before filling in all fields; closing as dup) *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 499859 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 16:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 12:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081636.n48GaQ31000555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-08 12:36:23 EDT --- For F-11/10, please visit bodhi system: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ and submit requests to push rebuild packages into repositories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081711.n48HBV5e006556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 13:11:30 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343426 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0514a4a70b929361758f8a9c16705b53 WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=29, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 1.56 cusr 0.27 csys = 1.87 CPU) + Package perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder) = 1.10000 Requires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized) Suggestions: 1) Are you sure you need BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.8.1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:22:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081722.n48HMChS008274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #17 from David Sugar 2009-05-08 13:22:10 EDT --- I created my accounts, certificates, etc...but before I play with anything I will want to look over the existing wiki pages further :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081723.n48HN1p6003008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-05-08 13:23:00 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, but I've been trying to reach the author for license clarification. No response yet, and I see other unanswered attempts on the message board to get a clear statement out of the author. I'm going to consider my options, but at this point I guess we have to consider this review dead in the water on legal grounds. :-( With regards to comment #1, the spec file link now works. Also, this package does not include a library of any kind. It is purely a header file that maps the C expat headers into C++ classes with inline code. And, finally, it's really old and doesn't include a bunch of stuff from newer versions of expat. Given all that, I'm really tempted to write my own and give it a real open source license. Give me a couple of days to think this over. If I decide to go with writing my own, I'll close this review bug. Thanks for the comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081722.n48HMg5N008422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 13:22:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343552 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 68129579330a63296474101f0cd51dfb86f9f671 Daemon-Generic-0.51.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave No tests defined for Daemon::Generic extension. + Package perl-Daemon-Generic-0.51-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Daemon::Generic) = 0.51 perl(Daemon::Generic::Event) = 0.3 perl(Daemon::Generic::While1) = 0.3 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Daemon::Generic) perl(Event) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Flock) perl(File::Slurp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(POSIX) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081728.n48HS8wx003880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-08 13:28:07 EDT --- Now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wikin again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081728.n48HSiC0009336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-08 13:28:43 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499875] New: Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 Summary: Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/libdasm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/libdasm-1.5-1.src.rpm Description: libdasm is a C-library that tries to provide simple and convenient way to disassemble x86 raw opcode bytes (machine code). It can parse and print out opcodes in AT&T and Intel syntax. It also includes a Python module, which I believe is the only Python module that can directly disassemble machine code (pointers to others welcome) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081734.n48HYLQn010291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #5 from David Sugar 2009-05-08 13:34:20 EDT --- I am going to look this over later tonight or maybe even over the weekend. There are some aspects that I may wish to do a new upstream release for also... In respect to init scripts, I usually like to keep the scripts themselves simple because they are going to run on different platforms...but most of this relates to the package part :). One concern I find in this is I wish to make sure that the upstream source picks the same directories as the packaging system :). For that, for things like python_sitearch, etc, I think I should add to configure.ac some stuff so I can do something like --with-python-sitearch=%{python_sitearch}..., --with-python-sitelib=..., --with-initrd-dir=... in %configure rather than simply depend on the upstream target directories happening to match :). So I want to think about that aspect later today... This in many ways is a good package for use in training, as it covers so many different aspects and issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:36:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:36:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081736.n48HasaF005603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-08 13:36:53 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1343549 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dc4d4c8a17ae725791263161b1167b1b6a1fabde pefile-1.2.10-63.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 17:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 13:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081749.n48HnDpk013033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-08 13:49:12 EDT --- Thanks; requesting CVS New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-pefile Short Description: Python module for working with Portable Executable files Owners: dmalcolm Branches: EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081803.n48I3BZa011046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Barnes 2009-05-08 14:03:10 EDT --- I got a build error with this: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tdb.so rpmlint output: libtdb.src: I: checking libtdb.src:58: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:59: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:60: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:63: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:64: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:65: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:68: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:69: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:71: E: files-attr-not-set libtdb.src:72: E: files-attr-not-set Issues to resolve: - Missing Requires: pkgconfig. - devel and tdb-tools files are missing a %defattr. - Add missing Python library or disable Python bindings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081803.n48I3Ebx016233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 --- Comment #1 from Matthew Barnes 2009-05-08 14:03:13 EDT --- rpmlint output: libtalloc.i586: I: checking libtalloc.i586: E: no-ldconfig-symlink /usr/lib/libtalloc.so.1.3.0 libtalloc.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libtalloc.so.1.3.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 libtalloc.i586: W: no-documentation libtalloc.i586: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig libtalloc.i586: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig libtalloc-debuginfo.i586: I: checking libtalloc-devel.i586: I: checking libtalloc.src: I: checking libtalloc.src:53: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:54: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:55: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:56: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:58: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:59: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:61: E: files-attr-not-set libtalloc.src:62: E: files-attr-not-set Issues to resolve: - Missing Requires: pkgconfig. - devel files are missing a %defattr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081805.n48I580U011693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-08 14:05:07 EDT --- Thanks David! I didn't have an issue with unoconv until I read your message. I just tried it with some documents I had. It works with most of them but it consistently fails with some others. I'll let you know if I find a solution. Would you like to comaintain? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unoconv Short Description: Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081820.n48IKTHr014470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-05-08 14:20:28 EDT --- I think you actually mean Jussi instead of me. The only problems I ran into were when I tried to swap types - ie, I tried to move ods to doc (as opposed to odt to doc which worked well) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081835.n48IZxto022905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-08 14:35:58 EDT --- Oops sorry, yes I meant Jussi. Jussi, would you like to comaintain? But I'm fine if you'd like to join too, David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:41:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:41:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081841.n48IfWVI018671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #6 from David Sugar 2009-05-08 14:41:30 EDT --- It is safe for sipwitch-snmp to be separate because it may be separately installed on a network management station, for example to collect and decode traps. No sipwitch would be installed there :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 18:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 14:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081850.n48IoMrS026102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #58 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-08 14:50:19 EDT --- /sarcasm --on Will this be over this year? /sarcasm --off I made a review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Is there so many review requests or the whole review system is badly made? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081915.n48JFSwH025200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-08 15:15:28 EDT --- Ah, my stupidity. The upstream just made a new release including the previous patches right before I sent them the ppc64 patch. That one will go to the next release. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack_capture.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.9.33-1 - Update to 0.9.33 - Drop upstreamed patches - Fix the build failure on ppc64 koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1344058 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:17:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:17:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081917.n48JHsUi025718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Bug 498413 depends on bug 438588, which changed state. Bug 438588 Summary: Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-08 15:17:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Like this: > %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} > %{_datadir}/%{name}/* And even shorter to %{_datadir}/%{name}/ (In reply to comment #5) > Yes I know I can use wildcards, however I'd like to get notified (by the > unpackaged files check) if something changes there, so I would like to keep tne > enumeration of all files in that directory. Well, IMO you just need to make sure you don't accidentally package unwanted files like leftovers from svn or cvs. I would use %dir %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.png %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.svg %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.glade But this is up to you. At least for desktop-file-validate I'd use wildcards because you might forget to validate a file otherwise. (In reply to comment #6) > Take a look at other desktop files. None of them has Encoding, Version, > X-WIndow-Icon, X-Osso-Type. Encoding should not be in the file, this is correct, but the rest of the file is acceptable. The version key is usually added during install by desktop-file-install and the other keys starting with X- are ok. Whenever you want to extend the freedesktop spec with custom keys you need to prefix them with X-, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ and especially http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/ar01s03.html But there are other problems with the desktop files: - /usr/bin is hardcoded in the Exec tag. Ether remove it or walk over it with sed during %prep to make sure the path always works: sed -i 's!/usr/bin!%{_bindir}!' data/*.desktop - What is "X-Osso-Type=application/x-executable" meant for? Are these programs supposed to open a mimetype? I guess not, at least not x-executable, but if so, you need to follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081939.n48JdwDl029307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #44 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-08 15:39:55 EDT --- Ah, thanks. http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/eclib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/eclib-20080310-7.p7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 19:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 15:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905081950.n48JoLdr031551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-08 15:50:20 EDT --- So nothing to fix except finish getting the dependencies in, it looks like? Thanks very much for the reviews! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082014.n48KEw6q008674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #9 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-08 16:14:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Yanko: you don't need to call ldconfig; you're not installing a library, just a > > shared object. > > Empirical evdence doesn't agree, (test rpm without ldconfig): Sorry, I did not notice it uses ld.so.conf.d. > > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{myplugdir}/*.{a,la} > > Why do you call a recursive rm here? > > Just a habit. Doubt it will hurt anything, but the -r can be removed. > > > Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing > > --disable-static to configure? > > not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage. > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la 1.) .la is not a static library 2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no reason at all -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082037.n48Kb4K4009622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-08 16:37:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > Isn't it possible to avoid build of the static library by passing > > > --disable-static to configure? > > > > not completely sufficient, thus just additional baggage. > > error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: > > /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.la > > 1.) .la is not a static library > 2.) You seem to have removed the rm line that deletes the .la file for no > reason at all What I meant was that between having both a --disable-static and a rm line and having just a rm line I'd prefer the latter. Seems like less clutter to me. Of course a few cycles and disk accesses making the static lib could be spared but imho its hardly worth it. Anyway, if this ever gets to the repo I'll put in the --disable-static. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:40:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082040.n48KeaNU014177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-05-08 16:40:36 EDT --- Thanks, Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Daemon-Generic Short Description: Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon Owners: eseyman Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082042.n48KgXp2014555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 16:42:32 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498277] Review Request: pam_yubico - A Pluggable Authentication Module for yubikeys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082042.n48KgTiW014475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498277 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 16:42:28 EDT --- pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pam_yubico-2.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082046.n48KkocS015356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #7 from David Sugar 2009-05-08 16:46:49 EDT --- I decided to try and complete all changes on the current upstream release. Updated spec: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec Updated srpm: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Updated patch: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.patch And I will shift some changes upstream after this... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 20:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 16:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082059.n48Kx5SS013624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-08 16:59:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Oops sorry, yes I meant Jussi. Jussi, would you like to comaintain? Sure, I can help, although from a packaging point of view this package is really simple.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082100.n48L0SXm018625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #11 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-08 17:00:27 EDT --- * Fri May 8 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.9.7-9 - use --disable-static http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/mysqludf_xql/mysqludf_xql-0.9.7-9.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:04:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:04:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082104.n48L4Xsi014572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-08 17:04:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libmetalink Short Description: A Metalink C library Owners: ant Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082107.n48L7pHR020017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 17:07:50 EDT --- abby-0.2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/abby-0.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] New: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Summary: Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/expatmm/expatmm.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/expatmm/expatmm-1.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ExpatMM is a C++ library that uses the efficient expat XML parser to create a C++ class base for the development of C++ event-driver parser objects. This library provides the developer with two C++ classes: - ExpatXMLParser: a generic parser where the developer must supply event methods for parse tokens, as well as supply the event method for reading input data into a local buffer. - ExpatXMLFileParser: a parser where the event method for reading input data is implemented as a file reader, with the filename being specified at instance construction. I see that rpmlint is complaining about an unused direct shlib dependency on libm. Libtool is generating a link command including -lm. So I tried relinking in the spec file, like so: cd src/.libs g++ -shared ${RPM_OPT_FLAGS} ExpatXMLParser.o ExpatXMLFileParser.o ExpatMM-version.o -Xlinker -soname -Xlinker libexpatmm.so.1 -o libexpatmm.so.%{version} -lexpat ... and rpmlint still complains about the unused direct shlib dependency. It appears that libstdc++ is linked against libm, which may be the source of the problem. In any case, I don't know how to satisfy rpmlint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499049] Review Request: ExpatImpl-devel - C++ wrapper for expat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082117.n48LHqJS021712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499049 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-05-08 17:17:51 EDT --- Forget this package. There's a much better, more up-to-date, and definitely free C++ wrapper for expat. I'll port the application I'm working with over to that wrapper. See bug #499913 for more information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082136.n48LaxAr025623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082136.n48Lavs1025596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-08 17:36:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder Short Description: WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 21:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082137.n48LbnXc021648@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-08 17:37:48 EDT --- You can try where https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Common_Rpmlint_Issues#unused-direct-shlib-dependency gets you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 22:00:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:00:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225668] Merge Review: cscope In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082200.n48M0RWo031255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225668 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Adam Jackson 2009-05-08 18:00:24 EDT --- Package is fine in rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 22:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082259.n48MxEAc007949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 --- Comment #2 from Simo Sorce 2009-05-08 18:59:13 EDT --- Ok uploaded new spec and srpm The python bindings are not normally built in mock/koji as python devel stuff is not listed in devel dependencies but I removed the file as a convenience for people that rebuilds on their machine. Fixed Requires Fixed %defattr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 23:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 19:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082301.n48N11vX003962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 --- Comment #2 from Simo Sorce 2009-05-08 19:01:00 EDT --- Fixed symlink Fixed Requires Fixed %defattr Unless Warnings are critical it should be fine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 8 23:18:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 19:18:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905082318.n48NIIKO006307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(nushio at fedoraproj | |ect.org) | --- Comment #32 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-05-08 19:18:15 EDT --- Hi there, sorry for the late reply. [Excuse] Fedora 11 left one laptop and one desktop completely out of service, which left me with no room to develop. I just grabbed my bro's F10 laptop and am finishing the packages. [/Excuse] I'll update this message as soon as I repackage the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 01:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 21:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090133.n491Xv9m027729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-05-08 21:33:56 EDT --- Glad to see Ampache being packaged for Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 02:02:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090202.n4922ORv032054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(promac at gmail.com) --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-05-08 22:02:23 EDT --- Receiving 404 for the src rpm - let me know when it is up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 02:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090208.n4928KJr028723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(promac at gmail.com) | --- Comment #3 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-08 22:08:19 EDT --- Sorry. It has just changed the directory: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/atrpms/ampache-3.5-6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 02:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090235.n492ZqsX005520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matthew Barnes 2009-05-08 22:35:51 EDT --- Looks okay to me. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 02:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 22:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090236.n492awWF001765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matthew Barnes 2009-05-08 22:36:57 EDT --- Nah, the warnings can be ignored. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sCCh012896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:54:11 EDT --- nfoview-1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4308 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sqc2016844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:54:51 EDT --- perl-Clipboard-0.09-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sJKC016759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:54:16 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090355.n493tk6J017364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.0-6.fc10 |3.0.0-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496476] Review Request: perl-Clipboard - Copy and paste with any OS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sunP016868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496476 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.09-1.fc10 |0.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090356.n493ubOf017536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:56:37 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090356.n493ugpC017568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0.1-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sQdJ016791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:54:25 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update powwow'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090356.n493upZm017605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:56:50 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wavemon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4334 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090359.n493xRTR014276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:59:26 EDT --- polkit-qt-0.9.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090355.n493tfmH013513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:55:39 EDT --- soci-3.0.0-10.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090355.n493tT8S013446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:55:27 EDT --- firebird-2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sVW6012953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:54:30 EDT --- qmforge-2.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090358.n493wQHG014053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:58:25 EDT --- pianobooster-0.6.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090358.n493wtWA014169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3-2.fc9 |0.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090359.n493x1PE014200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:59:00 EDT --- libvmime-0.9.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498790] Review Request: firebird - SQL relational database management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090355.n493tXV0013491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498790 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc10 |2.1.2.18118.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494965] Review Request: pianobooster - A MIDI file player that teaches you how to play the piano In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090358.n493wVRd014086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494965 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.2-4.fc10 |0.6.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090354.n493sa3R012987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.1-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090358.n493wkVM014128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:58:45 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wavemon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4357 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491579] Review Request: jjack - JACK audio driver for the Java Sound API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090358.n493wphZ018144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491579 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:58:50 EDT --- jjack-0.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940FGL018839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.06-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090357.n493vUMo017782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:57:29 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090357.n493vZs4017909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.1-3.fc11 |3.0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090359.n493xHbQ018251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:59:15 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494073] Review Request: libvmime - Powerful library for MIME messages and Internet messaging services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090359.n493x659018187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494073 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.0-3.fc9 |0.9.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090359.n493xL3h018292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:59:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:59:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497192] Review Request: polkit-qt - Qt bindings for PolicyKit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090359.n493xVr5018332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497192 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940eQa018973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.20-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090358.n493wfmq018100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:58:41 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ykclient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4356 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 03:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 23:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090357.n493vwll018012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-08 23:57:56 EDT --- EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update EekBoek'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090403.n49434OJ015761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:03:02 EDT --- systemtapguiserver-1.0-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940ZxK015058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:00:34 EDT --- mb2md-3.20-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090401.n4941uta015452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:01:55 EDT --- backintime-0.9.22-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940Ber014992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:00:10 EDT --- perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090403.n4943TDa015845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:03:28 EDT --- meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498407] Review Request: bind-dyndb-ldap - LDAP back-end plug-in for BIND In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090401.n49412kU015227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498407 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:01:01 EDT --- bind-dyndb-ldap-0.1.0-0.1.a1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495398] Review Request: perl-Net-UPnP - Perl extension for UPnP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940kDb015103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495398 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:00:45 EDT --- perl-Net-UPnP-1.41-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090402.n4942r1u015698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:02:51 EDT --- griffith-0.10-0.1.beta2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489795] Review Request: backintime - Simple backup system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090402.n49421Cc015490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489795 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.22-2.fc10 |0.9.22-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940q8k015143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:00:51 EDT --- perl-MIME-EncWords-1.010.101-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944STh016054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.24.2-1.fc10 |2.26.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497661] Review Request: perl-MIME-EncWords - Deal with RFC 2047 encoded words In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090400.n4940uo8015177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497661 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.010.101-2.fc9 |1.010.101-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090403.n4943FJT015797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:03:14 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Database'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4410 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944Jb4016009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:04:17 EDT --- perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-Report'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483543] Review Request: systemtapguiserver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090403.n494380D019591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483543 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-8.fc10 |1.0-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947LSe020859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:07:20 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947AKa020805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.20-4.fc10 |3.20-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491617] Review Request: mingw32-libxml++ - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for libxml2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944N3A019831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491617 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:04:22 EDT --- mingw32-libxml++-2.26.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090406.n4946lUF020725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:06:46 EDT --- perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944haQ019892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.02-1.fc9 |1.02-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:05:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:05:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090405.n4945sq1020540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.2-4.fc9 |0.0.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090406.n49461ov020571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:06:00 EDT --- perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090403.n4943YmF019680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.2-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492898] Review Request: griffith - Media collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090402.n4942vKg019533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492898 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.10-0.1.beta2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090406.n4946xoP020767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:06:58 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-EventLog'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4444 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090405.n4945jpQ020501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:05:44 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jnettop'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4434 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944oj4019929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:04:49 EDT --- perl-File-Flock-2008.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-File-Flock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497863] Review Request: mb2md - Mailbox to maildir converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n49475xB017377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497863 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:07:05 EDT --- mb2md-3.20-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947W9H017478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:07:31 EDT --- perl-App-Daemon-0.06-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497634] Review Request: perl-App-Daemon - Start an Application as a Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947alA017511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497634 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.06-1.fc11 |0.06-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090405.n49453U6016817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:05:02 EDT --- mingw32-libglade2-2.6.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492133] Review Request: mingw32-libglade2 - MinGW Windows Libglade2 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090405.n49457nB016858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492133 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6.3-1.fc10 |2.6.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n49493I0017915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:02 EDT --- tucan-0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n4948BsX017678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.006.2-2.fc10 |1.006.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944ubd016468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:04:55 EDT --- febootstrap-1.5-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492266] Review Request: photoprint-borders Collection of frames for PhotoPrint utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090405.n4945orB017020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492266 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:05:49 EDT --- photoprint-borders-0.0.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:06:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:06:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090406.n4946qju017339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492259] Review Request: tucan - Manager for downloads and uploads at hosting sites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n49497kR017950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492259 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc10 |0.3.7-0.1.alpha.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n49480sQ017630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.00-1.fc9 |1.00-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497663] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser - XSS filter using HTML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090404.n4944dIZ016351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497663 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:04:38 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-Parser-1.02-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496475] Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090406.n49465Jb017152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496475 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.98-1.fc10 |0.98-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n4948M6i017740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:08:21 EDT --- perl-Getopt-ArgvFile-1.11-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496021] Review Request: perl-Getopt-ArgvFile - Interpolates script options from files into @ARGV or another array In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n4948QMv017770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496021 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.11-2.fc10 |1.11-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949HE9017984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.1-3.fc9 |3.0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949NTw018014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:22 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-File'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947QRB017442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.15-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CPeR022571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:12:24 EDT --- dnsjava-2.0.6-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949e1X021566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:39 EDT --- meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n4948bRc021398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:08:37 EDT --- cppcheck-1.31-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494AEfh022089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.1-2.fc10 |1.4.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949ioh021600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.2-3.fc10 |0.9.2-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497660] Review Request: perl-MIME-Charset - Charset Informations for MIME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n49487Uc021329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497660 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:08:07 EDT --- perl-MIME-Charset-1.006.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:08:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:08:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497805] Review Request: cppcheck - A tool for static C/C++ code analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090408.n4948gWo021429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.31-1.fc10 |1.31-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494Aalj022198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 --- Comment #48 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:10:34 EDT --- rubygem-ferret-0.11.6-9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498849] Review Request: klatexformula - Application for easy image creating from a LaTeX equation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949DPx021501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498849 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:12 EDT --- klatexformula-3.0.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090411.n494Bi8p022494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.17-2.fc10 |0.0.17-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494ASGN022152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0-1.fc10 |3.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497665] Review Request: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber - Perl module implementing CipherSaber encryption In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947usi021284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497665 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:07:55 EDT --- perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468597] Review Request: rubygem-ferret - Full-featured text search engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494AeqI022236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468597 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.11.6-9.fc9 |0.11.6-9.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949oH5021644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:49 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-CSV'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090407.n4947pas021251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:07:50 EDT --- libmemcached-0.28-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmemcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4453 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481717] Review Request: ugene - genome analysis suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494A9Qm018875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481717 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:10:08 EDT --- ugene-1.4.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494E9Jb019718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:14:08 EDT --- perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494Dw3N019667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:13:58 EDT --- php-feedcreator-1.7.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496524] Review Request: jorbis - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Decoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090411.n494Beo5019263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496524 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:11:39 EDT --- jorbis-0.0.17-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CC1G019339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:12:11 EDT --- soci-3.0.0-10.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494DZlp019589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:13:33 EDT --- photoprint-0.4.0-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494DpVU019636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.82-1.fc9 |0.82-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494D6As019488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:13:05 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CJEI019375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0.0-10.fc10 |3.0.0-10.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CqYT019443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.91-4.fc10 |0.91-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453850] Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494AN34018929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:10:21 EDT --- globus-openssl-3.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090409.n4949Z76018247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:34 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xcowsay'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4473 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090411.n494BYZM019228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:11:33 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Template'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4501 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090410.n494A0tj018529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:09:59 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update minicomputer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090416.n494GESU024229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:16:13 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496701] Review Request: gxmessage - GTK2 based xmessage clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090415.n494FpBI024113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496701 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:15:50 EDT --- gxmessage-2.12.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090416.n494Gqnj024371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:16:52 EDT --- perl-String-Diff-0.04-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090416.n494GJwW024261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.15-1.fc9 |1.2.15-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496606] Review Request: perl-Log-LogLite - Create simple logs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494Dl8i023235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496606 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:13:46 EDT --- perl-Log-LogLite-0.82-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494EDA9023316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.04-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495411] Review Request: dnsjava - Java DNS implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CUWo022678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495411 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.0.6-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090415.n494FXfh024019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:15:32 EDT --- qt-creator-1.1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497980] Review Request: perl-String-Diff - Simple diff to String In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090416.n494GvDI024402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497980 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.04-2.fc11 |0.04-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492396] Review Request:php-feedcreator - Create RSS feeds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494E3Yx023277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492396 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.7.2-3.fc9 |1.7.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CcTM022920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:12:37 EDT --- perl-HTML-StripScripts-1.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494DBgM023084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.03-3.fc10 |0.03-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490380] Review Request: qt-creator - Lightweight and cross-platform IDE for Qt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090415.n494Fc8B024066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490380 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.0-2.fc9 |1.1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:13:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:13:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491128] Review Request: photoprint - Utility for printing digital photographs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090413.n494Ddtc023198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491128 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.0-6.fc9 |0.4.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090417.n494HGXm024451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20041202-5.fc10 |20041202-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497662] Review Request: perl-HTML-StripScripts - Strip scripting constructs out of HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CgPT022952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497662 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-1.fc10 |1.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494EsnX023426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:14:53 EDT --- perl-Mixin-Linewise-0.002-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496473] Review Request: perl-Mixin-Linewise - Write your linewise code for handles; this does the rest In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090414.n494Ew8C023452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496473 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.002-1.fc10 |0.002-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497338] Review Request: python-cclib - A library for processing results of computational chemistry packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494Cm5q022980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497338 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:12:47 EDT --- python-cclib-0.91-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090415.n494F4vW023788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:15:03 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090415.n494F9Yv023829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc11 |7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:16:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:16:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090416.n494GAnG024192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:16:09 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Configuration'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4554 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090412.n494CwMp023022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:12:57 EDT --- wavemon-0.6-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update wavemon'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4523 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090415.n494FFlF023940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:15:14 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update clthreads'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4538 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090416.n494G41a024162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:16:03 EDT --- perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-INI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090417.n494Htiq021001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:17:54 EDT --- meterbridge-0.9.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494I6WV021076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:18:04 EDT --- jVorbisEnc-0.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090417.n494HXP8020920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:17:32 EDT --- php-pecl-runkit-0.9-10.CVS20090215.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494IsnM021290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:18:53 EDT --- ogmtools-1.5-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499316] Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090417.n494HxXJ021038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.2-3.fc9 |0.9.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494IXU6021193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:18:32 EDT --- l2fprod-common-7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438588] Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090417.n494HBR0020869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:17:09 EDT --- zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494IGxi021133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:18:15 EDT --- mingw32-libsqlite3x-20071018-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475017] Review Request: l2fprod-common - In JavaSE missing Swing components, inspired from modern user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494Ic0M021231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc9 |7.3-5.20090428cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477750] Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494Ixn2021338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5-6.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:19:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:19:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090419.n494JRJm025335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:19:26 EDT --- rmol-0.20.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090421.n494LYf4026235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-6.fc10 |1.0.0-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491581] Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494IAUu025074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-3.fc10 |0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090419.n494JWL3025372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.20.0-3.fc10 |0.20.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494IlIj025225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.002-2.fc10 |0.002-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496477] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create - Paste to http://pastebin.com from Perl In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494Ih0d025198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496477 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:18:43 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-PastebinCom-Create-0.002-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491618] Review Request: mingw32-libsqlite3x - MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the sqlite database library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090418.n494ILjp025131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491618 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|20071018-7.fc10 |20071018-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090419.n494JE3P025281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:19:13 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Authentication'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4580 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:19:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:19:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090419.n494JxvK025450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:19:58 EDT --- lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-vocoder-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4589 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090421.n494LF48026151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Bug 453858 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453858 depends on bug 453857, which changed state. Bug 453857 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:21:14 EDT --- globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494NxLW022988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:23:57 EDT --- vidalia-0.1.12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486302] Review Request: parrot - Parrot Virtual Machine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090421.n494LSEH022457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486302 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:21:26 EDT --- parrot-1.0.0-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496168] Review Request: termit - Simple terminal emulator based on vte library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090422.n494MoUV022717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496168 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:22:49 EDT --- termit-2.2.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494OThc023123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:24:28 EDT --- nssbackup-0.2-0.2.rc7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494O98f023040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:24:08 EDT --- perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494Nc6e022889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-1.fc9 |1.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494OJHK023079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:24:18 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-Common-0.03-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090422.n494MWLO022637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.26-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494NEoE022823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:23:12 EDT --- pdfposter-0.5.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090422.n494MhiE022682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.001-2.fc10 |0.001-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090421.n494LKFi022380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.10-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090421.n494LA57022312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:21:09 EDT --- lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-swh-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4605 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090426.n494Qdj3028228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:26:38 EDT --- php-geshi-1.0.8.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494O3ha027181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.12-1.fc10 |0.1.12-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090422.n494MSLh026493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:22:27 EDT --- perl-Perl-Tags-0.26-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494NOpC027006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:23:23 EDT --- camcardsync-0.1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494PORn027857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:25:23 EDT --- perl-Module-Used-1.2.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494NYpA027080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:23:33 EDT --- globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494PDrI027686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:25:13 EDT --- gausssum-2.1.6-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498216] Review Request: perl-Perl-Tags - Generate Ctags style tags for Perl sourcecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494ODhW027225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498216 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.26-1.fc10 |0.26-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090427.n494RFaC028302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.0-2.fc9 |1.6.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492773] Review Request: camcardsync - tool for copying photos from a camera card In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494NSXJ027041@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492773 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.1-2.fc9 |0.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498324] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC-Common - Perl module for handling JSON-RPC objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494ONgs027263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498324 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.03-3.fc9 |0.03-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496478] Review Request: perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create - Create new pastes on http://rafb.net/ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090422.n494MckF026821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496478 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:22:38 EDT --- perl-WWW-Pastebin-RafbNet-Create-0.001-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498220] Review Request: perl-Module-Used - Find modules loaded by Perl code without running it In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494PSIr027888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498220 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.0-1.fc10 |1.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495311] Review Request: pdfposter - Scale and tile PDF images/pages to print on multiple pages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090423.n494NITA026971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495311 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.0-1.fc9 |0.5.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498214] Review Request: gausssum - A GUI application for analysis of output of quantum computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494PIBp027801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498214 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1.6-3.fc10 |2.1.6-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090426.n494QYdi028194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:26:34 EDT --- perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-INI'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4667 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090426.n494Q64q028056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:26:05 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-JSON-RPC'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4663 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494P5Ai023933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc10 |3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497862] Review Request: python-paida - Pure Python scientific analysis package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494P0SF023604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497862 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:24:59 EDT --- python-paida-3.2.1_2.10.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:27:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458359] Review Request: gpscorrelate - A GPS photo correlation / geotagging tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090427.n494RAwm024382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458359 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:27:08 EDT --- gpscorrelate-1.6.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492395] Review Request: php-geshi - Generic syntax highlighter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090426.n494QhXt024327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492395 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.8.3-1.fc10 |1.0.8.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090426.n494QGA8024274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4-2.fc10 |4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090425.n494PYYI024008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:25:33 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rapid-photo-downloader'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4657 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489418] Review Request: nssbackup - (Not so) Simple Backup Suite for desktop use In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494OYQm023277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-0.2.rc7.fc10 |0.2-0.2.rc7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492990] Review Request: zynjacku - LV2 synths and plugins host In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090426.n494QBxV024241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492990 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:26:10 EDT --- zynjacku-4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090424.n494Ou7A023574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 00:24:55 EDT --- lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lv2-zynadd-plugins'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4651 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 04:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 00:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090427.n494RLDq024419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-09 00:27:20 EDT --- In case you find solutions to the issues, you can update the package. ****** UPDATED ******* New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: unoconv Short Description: Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org Owners: oget jussilehtola Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: ********************** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 06:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 02:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090616.n496GkGO006952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #9 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-09 02:16:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-rpm-macros-0.1-6.fc10.src.rpm Makes this noarch. Otherwise, patch applied. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 06:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 02:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090627.n496RE6o008282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-09 02:27:13 EDT --- %build could be empty # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. - OK # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK, php pear package # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK $ md5sum Text_Diff-1.1.0.tgz SOURCES/Text_Diff-1.1.0.tgz 9dcea8c122d2e92a90ca48b7b16a876f Text_Diff-1.1.0.tgz 9dcea8c122d2e92a90ca48b7b16a876f SOURCES/Text_Diff-1.1.0.tgz # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, builded on fc10 i386 # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, ... - OK, # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK, no locale # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library... - OK, no shared library # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, - OK # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc).. - OK, no .pc files # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no library # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package ... - OK, no devel package # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, - OK, no gui # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} - OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 08:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 04:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090801.n4981eZN025719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-09 04:01:39 EDT --- Hmm, I still don't see the point in shipping this package on archs without ghc builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090902.n4992JBG003698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #4 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 05:02:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > > - add ldconfig calls > > Although the guidelines don't say so explicitly, I don't think it makes sense > to apply this requirement to shareables that are extension modules for > interpreted languages like TCL, since the code isn't activated by ld itself, > but rather by the interpreter (e.g. /usr/bin/tclsh) with calls to dlopen(). > This specfile was based on an existing Fedora 10 specfile for the tcl-zlib > extension, which does not perform ldconfig calls, either. Hello Bryson, ok i think you are right on this one. Some tcl packages have the ldconfig command indeed, however you convinced me that it doesnt actually makes sense. About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090915.n499FkF6005911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #15 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 05:15:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Okay. I can sponsor you, but first I want to see that you know the packaging > guidelines. This means you must do a) informal reviews of other packages [you > can do real ones after you have been sponsored] and b) submit a few other > packages for review. hi Jussi, there are new package review requests here bug 490061 and here bug 499409 and my first attempt to do a complete review here bug 499319. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090924.n499OStk000891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 05:24:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hi Guido, thanks for this submission. > > I guess after the recent discussions about mixers, pluseaudio, alsa etc, it's > just the right time for this package. I do have the hardware, so I' going to > review this. Stay tuned. Hi Christoph thank you; if you are wondering why i move soundfonts from the source package default /usr/share/sounds/sf2 to /usr/share/soundfonts, it's because while i had no hint about that from the guidelines, i found other packages shipping soundfonts in that directory: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont and fluid-soundfont cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-WikiConverter-Markdow n/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module contains rules for converting HTML into Markdown markup. You should not use this module directly; HTML::WikiConverter is the entry point for html->wiki conversion (eg, see synopsis above). See HTML::WikiConverter for additional usage details. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1344790 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090928.n499SwYc001539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-09 05:28:57 EDT --- Thanks. I like the package and am eventually going approve it. You need to get sponsored in order to import and maintain it. In meanwhile, it would be awesome if you could do a couple of informal reviews similar to what arthur has done here. That's usually done to show that you're familiar with the packaging guidelines and are comfortable with RPM packaging. I'll sponsor you then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090947.n499ladH004247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 05:47:34 EDT --- I am going to sponsor Guido, so removing the FE-NEEDSPONSOR tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090948.n499mWDE010338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090947.n499lpEM010284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090952.n499qBEo004991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 05:52:10 EDT --- Okay, having a look. Removing NEEDSPONSOR tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 09:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 05:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905090951.n499pY6N004935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 05:51:33 EDT --- I am sponsoring Guido, so I will do the review on this package. Bryson: do you still need a sponsor? I can sponsor you, if you do some reviews and submit a couple of other packages for review (other than tcl packages, that is). - Why do you disable threading? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 10:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091007.n49A7f1G013139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 06:07:40 EDT --- - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java states as minimum BR:s and Requires: BuildRequires: java-devel [>= specific_version] BuildRequires: jpackage-utils Requires: java >= specific_version Requires: jpackage-utils - You can probably drop BR: libgcj after adding the above. - Have a look at the spec file template for ant at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#ant_2 - Remove any preexisting jar files in the %setup phase with find -name '*.jar' -o -name '*.class' -exec rm -f '{}' \; (this in order to make sure that everything is built from source). - When installing, use "-p" to preserve time stamps. - jar file must have same name as package: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming (drop the symlinking and just install %{name}.jar in %_javadir) - Same goes with javadocdir, don't version it. - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) for javadoc package as well. Once you have fixed these I will do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 10:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091010.n49AA55T007610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 06:10:04 EDT --- Also, you could add Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to javadoc package so that it gets removed when the jargs package is removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 10:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091025.n49APYEH015852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-09 06:25:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Text-Diff Short Description: Engine for performing and rendering text diffs Owners: xavierb Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 10:28:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:28:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091028.n49ASvWo010250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 10:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091037.n49Ab7d3011550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 06:37:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - Why do you disable threading? Duh, you explaiend it in comment #1. - You are not providing snmptools, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#Naming_Conventions . This is OK, considering the genericish base name of the package. - Doesn't the version macro at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#arch-specific_packages work? Where does it fail? - Have you tried the configure argument --libdir=%{tcl_sitearch} to change the default install location? - Do you really need to specify --with-tcl=%{_libdir}? OK, on multiarch arches with both 32- and 64-bit versions installed you might get into trouble if configure picks up the wrong version. No hurt having this if you think it's necessary. rpmlint output: tcl-snmptools.src: W: invalid-license CMU tcl-snmptools.x86_64: W: invalid-license CMU tcl-snmptools-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license CMU 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - License tag should be MIT (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ). But this is really not necessary, since CMU is compatible with GPL and License: GPLv3+ is enough. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - See comment above, license tag should be just GPLv3+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK UST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Even though the files that are installed are generated, it's always nice to preserve time stamps in install phase. Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. ~OK - Instead of %dir %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version} %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/*.so %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/pkgIndex.tcl just put %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/ as this will own the directory and everything in it. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add AUTHORS. BUGS and TODO should otherwise be included, but now they just contain instructions to grep the code. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 10:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 06:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091041.n49AftHG018333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 06:41:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > NEEDSWORK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and > meet the Licensing Guidelines > - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag CMU is compatible with GPL, and the CMU files are compiled with the GPL files, resulting in a binary that is solely under GPL. Thus license tag is GPLv3+. > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > - add ldconfig calls This wouldn't do anything since no libraries are installed in standard library directories (and no file is shipped into /etc/ld.so.conf.d/). :) (In reply to comment #4) > About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already > available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case. There's no netsnmp library in the package, it links to the netsnmp library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 11:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 07:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091146.n49Bk2WL021841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 07:46:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - jar file must have same name as package: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming > (drop the symlinking and just install %{name}.jar in %_javadir) > > - Same goes with javadocdir, don't version it. Ok for all other things, but why do you ask that? It seems that most java packages come versioned and symlinked (for javadoc as well). It is a jpackage guideline and there seems to be nothing opposing that in Fedora-java guidelines; look here: http://www.jpackage.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/src/jpackage-utils/doc/jpackage-1.5-policy.xhtml?revision=HEAD&root=jpackage#id2480655 Maybe because jargs 1.0 is mature since 2006 and there will hardly be a new release? Here are updated spec and srpm (with other fixes but without above, waiting for explanation): http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm As a side note, other packages originally coming from jpackage have Group: Development/Libraries/Java instead of Development/Libraries (ie the jakarta-commons-*.jar), but i used the last one to avoid an rpmlint warning. cheers (and thanks for your sponsorship!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 11:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 07:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091154.n49BstAH023023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 07:54:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > - jar file must have same name as package: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#Jar_file_naming > > (drop the symlinking and just install %{name}.jar in %_javadir) > > > > - Same goes with javadocdir, don't version it. > > Ok for all other things, but why do you ask that? It seems that most java > packages come versioned and symlinked (for javadoc as well). It is a jpackage > guideline and there seems to be nothing opposing that in Fedora-java > guidelines; Because the Fedora Java Packaging Guidelines say so; JPackage guidelines have no say on this :) > As a side note, other packages originally coming from jpackage have Group: > Development/Libraries/Java instead of Development/Libraries (ie the > jakarta-commons-*.jar), but i used the last one to avoid an rpmlint warning. Yes, Development/Libraries/Java is not a standard group; a standard group must be used. > cheers (and thanks for your sponsorship!) No problem. You could still do a few other reviews of other packages. We need more reviewers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 12:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091200.n49C0nRZ024229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 08:00:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #2) > > NEEDSWORK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and > > meet the Licensing Guidelines > > - some files are under CMU license (BSD like), fix the License tag > > CMU is compatible with GPL, and the CMU files are compiled with the GPL files, > resulting in a binary that is solely under GPL. Thus license tag is GPLv3+. > Ok, my bad, got that one now. > > NEEDSWORK - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must > > call ldconfig in %post and %postun > > - add ldconfig calls > > This wouldn't do anything since no libraries are installed in standard library > directories (and no file is shipped into /etc/ld.so.conf.d/). :) > ok; i tough that you might have /usr/lib/tcl8.5 in a file under /etc/ld.so.conf.d, provided by some other tcl- package. > (In reply to comment #4) > > About the NetSnmp library you ship and build with your package, isnt it already > > available on Fedora? you should try to avoid library duplicates in that case. > > There's no netsnmp library in the package, it links to the netsnmp library. Sorry, i was a bit confused here. This package ships the sources of the snmp tools, which are part of the upstream project, and are shipped with Fedora in net-snmp-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 12:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091220.n49CKaFm001059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #5 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 08:20:35 EDT --- > Because the Fedora Java Packaging Guidelines say so; JPackage guidelines have > no say on this :) Ok i found the thread in the ml and it was fairly convincing. The wiki should be fixed though, because the ant template suggests: %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} cp -p [build path to jar] \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar Can i do that or i need to ask someone to check it? here are the updated files: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 12:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091229.n49CTEKF002282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #1 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-09 08:29:13 EDT --- Let's take this package for review. - The %define LIBVER can be dropped as it isn't being used elsewhere in the .spec file - The 'make check' part doesn't belong in the %build phase, but in a seperate %check phase. - Does 'LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH make check' even work? The LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable is only necessary for native libraries, so it doesn't have any effect on MinGW packages. (I haven't build and tested the package myself yet) - The libtool .la files are required for proper operation on MinGW, so these don't need to be removed - The multilib stuff isn't required as we only support 32bit environments. It can all be dropped - Why does the defattr line contain the value '0755' ? Normally it should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 12:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] New: Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 Summary: Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: patrick.nussbaumer at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover.spec SRPM URL: http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover-0.3-1.20090503cvs.fc10.src.rpm Description: I would like to submit this package. It's build from the cvs source, because the latest version 0.3-beta6 contains some annoying memory leaks. Netdiscover doesn't seem to be under active development but I think it's a small and useful tool. This is my first package, so I will need a sponsor. Netdiscover is an active/passive address reconnaissance tool, mainly developed for those wireless networks without dhcp server, when you are wardriving. It can be also used on hub/switched networks. Built on top of libnet and libpcap, it can passively detect online hosts, or search for them, by actively sending arp requests, it can also be used to inspect your network arp traffic, or find network addresses using auto scan mode, which will scan for common local networks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 12:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091257.n49CvDMD000566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 Patrick Nussbaumer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 12:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 08:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091255.n49CtbYu000345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 08:55:36 EDT --- Thanks Jussi New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bibtex2html Short Description: Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML Owners: guidograzioli Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091302.n49D2ajV001489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:02:35 EDT --- xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091303.n49D3I0M001601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:03:18 EDT --- xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091301.n49D1N57001339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-05-09 09:01:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Ping ? > Package has passed review successfully (comment #7). > Bernie, do you still plan to import this package in Fedora ? Sorry, I hadn't noticed your comment in my bugmail, and eventually totally forgot about this package. Requesting CVS now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091303.n49D3cBu001659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 09:03:37 EDT --- Well, I still don't understand why ldconfig is needed here because lib_mysqludf_xql.so does not seem to be a library. On F-11, without ldconfig: ------------------------------------------------------------------ [root at localhost ~]# service mysqld start MySQL ????: [ OK ] [root at localhost ~]# ls -al /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 20764 2009-05-09 21:38 /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.so [root at localhost ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS STRING SONAME "lib_mysqludf_xql.so";' ERROR 1126 (HY000) at line 1: Can't open shared library 'lib_mysqludf_xql.so' (errno: 22 /usr/lib/mysql/plugin/lib_mysqludf_xql.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory) [root at localhost ~]# mv /usr/lib/mysql/lib_mysqludf_xql.so /usr/lib/mysql/plugin/ [root at localhost ~]# mysql mysql -e 'CREATE FUNCTION lib_mysqludf_xql_info RETURNS STRING SONAME "lib_mysqludf_xql.so";' [root at localhost ~]# ------------------------------------------------------------------ So on F-11, installing lib_mysqludf_xql.so under %_libdir/mysql/plugin work without ldconfig. Are there any possibility that installing lib_mysqludf_xql.so should be installed under somewhere else even on F-10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091303.n49D32FC001555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 09:03:01 EDT --- - I don't get your unused-direct-shlib-dependency on x86_64 F10 or F11 in mock: rpmlint output: expatmm-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. ~OK - Funny though, there is both a LICENSE and a COPYING, but they're identical. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091305.n49D5qms008313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:05:52 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091305.n49D5LWU008217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:05:20 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:07:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:07:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091307.n49D7k82002544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:07:45 EDT --- xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:05:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:05:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091305.n49D5gCF002233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:05:41 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091317.n49DH07i009924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:16:59 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091316.n49DGeGc009882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:16:39 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:16:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:16:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091316.n49DGR7E004050@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:16:26 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091319.n49DJE5h004280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:19:13 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glista-0.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091319.n49DJUuw010197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:19:29 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glista-0.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091322.n49DMM5C010825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:22:21 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091319.n49DJe7g004360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:19:39 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glista-0.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091322.n49DMAnV004954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 09:22:09 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091320.n49DKNMT004712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 09:20:22 EDT --- Oh, still a few things to fix: - Source url is incorrect: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Also, you might want to use %{version} in the Source URL line, so that you don't have to change the version in multiple locations (you might end up building an old version). - I don't think the explicit Java version is necessary: 1.4.2 is quite old and is found on every distribution. (In reply to comment #5) > > Because the Fedora Java Packaging Guidelines say so; JPackage guidelines have > > no say on this :) > > Ok i found the thread in the ml and it was fairly convincing. Which mailing list? > The wiki should be fixed though, because the ant template suggests: > > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir} > cp -p [build path to jar] \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_javadir}/%{name}-%{version}.jar > > Can i do that or i need to ask someone to check it? I wouldn't touch it since it's a guideline page that has been approved by FESCo. I'll send a message about it to the packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091329.n49DThUB011645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 09:29:42 EDT --- Package doesn't build in mock. You are missing BuildRequires: junit after which it builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091337.n49DbLTd007076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #8 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 09:37:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > > > Ok i found the thread in the ml and it was fairly convincing. > > Which mailing list? > fedora-devel-list march 08; rhat site is under maintenance now, i found it mirrored here: http://markmail.org/message/layd6xszdwguafzs > I wouldn't touch it since it's a guideline page that has been approved by > FESCo. I'll send a message about it to the packaging list. ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:44:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:44:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091344.n49DiCQb007899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #9 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 09:44:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) - Source url is incorrect: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net Also, you might want to use %{version} in the Source URL line, so that you don't have to change the version in multiple locations (you might end up building an old version). ok - I don't think the explicit Java version is necessary: 1.4.2 is quite old and is found on every distribution. ok (jarg will compile starting with java2 afterwards) (In reply to comment #7) > Package doesn't build in mock. You are missing > BuildRequires: junit > after which it builds. That's weird i avoided building the junit tests; are you referring to the warnings produced while building javadoc? (like here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1338558&name=build.log ) If we cant ignore those warnings i will modify the spec to include the test jar also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 13:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 09:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091355.n49DthwZ015547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-09 09:55:42 EDT --- Ok, looks good. There is one purely bureaucratic issue. In Fedora there is a strange policy that every lang-specific library should be named as lang-libraryname, e.g. according to this rule this package should be named as python-kinterbasdb. I advice you to rename package to python-kinterbasdb and add another one provides: Provides: kinterbasdb = %{version}-%{release} See, for example, http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec - I was forced to add "Provides: sippy = %{version}-%{release}" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 14:13:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 10:13:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091413.n49EDhv3018101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-09 10:13:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #7) > > Package doesn't build in mock. You are missing > > BuildRequires: junit > > after which it builds. > > That's weird i avoided building the junit tests; are you referring to the > warnings produced while building javadoc? (like here > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1338558&name=build.log ) > If we cant ignore those warnings i will modify the spec to include the test jar > also. If junit is not BR'd, the mock build fails in a bunch of errors (58 of them to be exact). If it is then it works. It does build the test jar, but AFAIK there's no need to ship it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 14:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 10:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091420.n49EKE39019287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Simo Sorce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Simo Sorce 2009-05-09 10:20:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtdb Short Description: A library that implements a trivial database. Owners: simo gd Branches: F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 14:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 10:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091420.n49EKAA4013286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Simo Sorce changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Simo Sorce 2009-05-09 10:20:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libtalloc Short Description: A library that implements a hierarchical memory allocator. Owners: simo gd Branches: F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 14:23:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 10:23:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] New: Review Request: redmine - redmine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: redmine - redmine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Summary: Review Request: redmine - redmine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine-0.8.3-5.fc10.src.rpm Description: Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 14:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 10:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091424.n49EOIE5019803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 david.hannequin at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 14:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 10:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091449.n49EnoSq017398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #14 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-09 10:49:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Well, I still don't understand why ldconfig is needed > So on F-11, installing lib_mysqludf_xql.so under %_libdir/mysql/plugin > work without ldconfig. Are there any possibility that installing > lib_mysqludf_xql.so should be installed under somewhere else > even on F-10? That is http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/udf-compiling.html vs http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/udf-compiling.html I consider the submission fine as is. For F11 myplugdir can become %{_libdir}/mysql/plugin/ and the post and postun can be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091621.n49GLFwA004533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #11 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-09 12:21:14 EDT --- Things should be sorted out now; files here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratch build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345057 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091634.n49GYLUT032356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-05-09 12:34:20 EDT --- Thanks David. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe Short Description: Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress Owners: ianweller Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091634.n49GYpl5006112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-05-09 12:34:50 EDT --- Thanks David. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any Short Description: Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress Owners: ianweller Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091635.n49GZKD7032764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:35:19 EDT --- For -2: * BR - build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------------------- 714 DEBUG: checking gcrypt/gcrypt.h usability... no 715 DEBUG: checking gcrypt/gcrypt.h presence... no 716 DEBUG: checking for gcrypt/gcrypt.h... no 717 DEBUG: checking gcrypt.h usability... no 718 DEBUG: checking gcrypt.h presence... no 719 DEBUG: checking for gcrypt.h... no 720 DEBUG: checking openssl/md5.h usability... no 721 DEBUG: checking openssl/md5.h presence... no 722 DEBUG: checking for openssl/md5.h... no 723 DEBUG: checking sasl/md5global.h usability... no 724 DEBUG: checking sasl/md5global.h presence... no 725 DEBUG: checking for sasl/md5global.h... no ------------------------------------------------------------- Looking at configure.in, common/digest.cpp, and utils/sipdigest.cpp, it seems that adding "BuildRequires: libgcrypt-devel is preferable. After that, build.log shows: ------------------------------------------------------------- 722 DEBUG: checking gcrypt/gcrypt.h usability... no 723 DEBUG: checking gcrypt/gcrypt.h presence... no 724 DEBUG: checking for gcrypt/gcrypt.h... no 725 DEBUG: checking gcrypt.h usability... yes 726 DEBUG: checking gcrypt.h presence... yes 727 DEBUG: checking for gcrypt.h... yes 728 DEBUG: checking for gcry_control in -lgcrypt... yes ------------------------------------------------------------- * build failure - -2 srpm installs sipwitch initscript under %buildroot%_sysconfdir/init.d, not %buildroot%_initrddir and build fails there. Currently the following is needed: ------------------------------------------------------------- %{__mkdir_p} %{buildroot}%{_initrddir} %{__mv} -f %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/* %{buildroot}%{_initrddir} rmdir %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/init.d/ ------------------------------------------------------------- * Initscripts - Requires(postun): initscripts is still missing. - "service sipwitch restart" won't work like: ------------------------------------------------------------- # service sipwitch restart Restarting sipwitch: /etc/init.d/sipwitch: line 116: start-stop-daemon: command not found ------------------------------------------------------------- * rpmlint - Still rpmlint complains like: ------------------------------------------------------------- sipwitch-python-swig.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sipwitch.py ------------------------------------------------------------- Please check my previous comment: > - If %{python_sitelib}/sipwitch.py is to be executed directly from > users, then this script should have 0755 permission. > Otherwise the shebang on this script should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480538] Review Request: iptux -- a tool for sharing and transporting files and directories in Lan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091638.n49Gcuwi006817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480538 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #47 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:38:52 EDT --- Thanks. Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091639.n49GdjwK000712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:39:42 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:41:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:41:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091641.n49GfUMi001247@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:41:29 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from anyone within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091644.n49GiQq2001470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:44:25 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091642.n49GgrxZ001341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(antti.andreimann@ | |mail.ee) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:42:51 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091643.n49Ghr3t007522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:43:51 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 16:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 12:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091644.n49Giqo8001622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 12:44:50 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 17:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 13:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091758.n49Hweu1018599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-09 13:58:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343228) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343228) Patch to compile with g++44 ping? Anyway: - Patch to compile with g++44 is attached - After this patch, build.log says: -------------------------------------------------- checking for pnm_readpaminit in -lpnm... no checking for pnm_readpaminit in -lnetpbm... no -------------------------------------------------- Perhaps BR: netpbm-devel should be added - Please update GTK cache updating scriptlets - BR: glib2-devel is redundant as gtk2-devel requires this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:00:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:00:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] New: Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Summary: Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix-0.04.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: guitarix is a simple mono amplifier to JACK (Jack Audio Connection Kit) with one input and two outputs. It is designed to get nice trash/metall/rock/blues guitar sounds. Controls for bass, treble, gain, compressor, preamp, balance, distortion, freeverb, crybaby(wah) and echo are available. A fixed resonator will be used when distortion is disabled. For the 'pressure' in the sound you can use the feedback and feedforward sliders. guitarix includes an experimental tuner and a JACK midi output port with 3 channels. They will be fed by a mix from a pitch tracker and a beat detector. You can pitch the octave (2 up or down), choose the midi channel, the program, the velocity and the sensitiviy, which means how fast the note will read after the beat detector emits a signal. Values can be set for the beat detector for all channels. rpmlint is silent. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345133 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:02:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:02:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091802.n49I2ZDZ019394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499306, 499323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:02:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:02:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091802.n49I2a2I019419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091802.n49I2bVK019441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499975 Bug 499323 depends on bug 499316, which changed state. Bug 499316 Summary: Review Request: meterbridge - Meter Bridge for JACK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499316 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091815.n49IFJtZ021440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-09 14:15:17 EDT --- Okay, I'll continue the review. - The .spec file contains a lot of commented out parts. You might want to remove these for readability - The %{_mingw32_configure} call contains --with-package-name='Fedora Core gstreamer package'. Fedora Core isn't used anymore these days, so you might want to use just plain 'Fedora' here (without the 'Core'). - When performing make, you've added -D__MSVCRT_VERSION__=0x0601 to the CFLAGS. You might want to put a reference to the discussion about this in there as a comment: http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org/msg00741.html - Isn't it possible to set the -D__MSVCRT_VERSION__=0x0601 in the %configure phase? This is recommended to minimize the chance of side-effects - At line 116 there's the comment '# Install doc temporarily in order to be included later by rpm'. This is confusing as the next line contains a regular 'make install' command - The libtool .la files don't need to be removed as they're required to compile applications/other libraries with want to link against gstreamer - You might want to put the .a files (static libraries) in a seperate -static subpackage - Why is an empty cache directory created in the %install phase? It isn't being used elsewhere in the .spec file - Why are the binaries split across two packages? - Why is the %defattr line at line 162 commented out ? - The include files and pkgconfig files are placed in the 'tools' subpackage, while they should be in the main package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091824.n49IOMmN016452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-09 14:24:20 EDT --- Just took a quick look at this: - The .dll files should be in %{_mingw32_bindir} instead of %{_mingw32_libdir} (like all the rest of the mingw32 packages) - The .dll.a and .la files need to be packaged in %{_mingw32_libdir} (so they shouldn't be removed) - The header files should also be packaged or else applications can't compile against this library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:27:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:27:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905091827.n49IR5QK023183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #8 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-09 14:27:04 EDT --- ok so something like that : http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/python-kinterbasdb.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 18:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 14:50:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] New: Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libssh2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libssh2-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: libssh2 is a library implementing the SSH2 protocol as defined by Internet Drafts: SECSH-TRANS(22), SECSH-USERAUTH(25), SECSH-CONNECTION(23), SECSH-ARCH(20), SECSH-FILEXFER(06)*, SECSH-DHGEX(04), and SECSH-NUMBERS(10). Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345171 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 19:51:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 15:51:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] New: Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libsoup.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libsoup-2.26.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libsoup is an HTTP library implementation in C. It was originally part of a SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol) implementation called Soup, but the SOAP and non-SOAP parts have now been split into separate packages. libsoup uses the Glib main loop and is designed to work well with GTK applications. This enables GNOME applications to access HTTP servers on the network in a completely asynchronous fashion, very similar to the Gtk+ programming model (a synchronous operation mode is also supported for those who want it). This is the MinGW build of Libsoup Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345258 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 19:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 15:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] New: Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows regular expression library. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345256 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092018.n49KI2hD006713@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Bug 225796 depends on bug 447832, which changed state. Bug 447832 Summary: broken URL in giflib package description https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447832 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:25:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:25:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092025.n49KPgAF001714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #5 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-09 16:25:41 EDT --- Ok, Ok... :) Sorry on my delay... two reasons: 1) My kids and I got sick 2) Much works on MLT and KDenlive at RPM fusion -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092047.n49KlHOH010987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:47:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:43:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092043.n49Kh9BV010380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:43:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] New: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libidn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libidn-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: GNU Libidn is an implementation of the Stringprep, Punycode and IDNA specifications defined by the IETF Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) working group, used for internationalized domain names. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345318 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092049.n49KnIbi004852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499987 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092045.n49Kj4NP004476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:45:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092045.n49Kjw3u004560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:45:56 EDT --- Please add a cvs request template here so we know what you want. Reset the fedora-cvs flag when you are ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092049.n49KnJnx004876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499987 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499987] New: Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499987 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-curl - MinGW Windows port of curl and libcurl Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 499979,499986 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-curl-7.19.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: cURL is a tool for getting files from HTTP, FTP, FILE, LDAP, LDAPS, DICT, TELNET and TFTP servers, using any of the supported protocols. cURL is designed to work without user interaction or any kind of interactivity. cURL offers many useful capabilities, like proxy support, user authentication, FTP upload, HTTP post, and file transfer resume. This is the MinGW cross-compiled Windows library. Koji scratch build: none for now because mingw32-libidn and mingw32-libssh2 aren't in Fedora yet Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092048.n49KmBmk011105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:51:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:51:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092051.n49KprXd011825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:51:52 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092049.n49KnFDt011206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:48:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494148] Review Request: soci - The database access library for C++ programmers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092048.n49KmhNR011159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494148 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092050.n49KoSeF011695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092053.n49KrlYk005780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:53:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092050.n49KovJ7005480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:50:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092050.n49KoSsZ005408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |srinivas_ramanatha at dell.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:50:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092057.n49Kv91v012640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:57:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092056.n49Ku66Z006440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:56:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:55:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:55:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092055.n49Kt3nP006248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:55:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:59:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:59:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092059.n49Kx1cB006730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:59:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 20:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 16:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092058.n49Kw79u006633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 16:58:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092101.n49L1AvO007365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:01:09 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092102.n49L22dw007467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:02:01 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092104.n49L4RvM013537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:04:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092105.n49L57xu013897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:05:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:06:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:06:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092106.n49L6dfN014123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:06:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092107.n49L7Qix014198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:07:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092110.n49LANbf014925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:10:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092111.n49LB5Bx015012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:11:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092112.n49LC5kt009017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:12:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092109.n49L9cud008385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 17:09:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] New: Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libxslt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-5.fc11.src.rpm Description: This C library allows to transform XML files into other XML files (or HTML, text, ...) using the standard XSLT stylesheet transformation mechanism. To use it you need to have a version of libxml2 >= 2.6.27 installed. The xsltproc command is a command line interface to the XSLT engine Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1345365 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092123.n49LNRW7016701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499992 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:23:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:23:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092123.n49LNStA016725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499992 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092123.n49LNTc2016752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499992 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] New: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 499983,499986,499991 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-WebKit-1.1.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: WebKit is an open source web browser engine. Koji scratch build: none for now because mingw32-libsoup, mingw32-libxslt and mingw32-libidn aren't in Fedora yet Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] New: Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Summary: Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dvtm-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dvtm.spec Description: dvtm brings the concept of tiling window management, popularized by X11-window managers like dwm to the console. As a console window manager it tries to make it easy to work with multiple console based programs like vim, mutt, cmus or irssi. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 21:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 17:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092143.n49Lh1eO013170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 17:43:00 EDT --- cclive-0.4.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cclive-0.4.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092218.n49MIQbN017882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:18:25 EDT --- php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092218.n49MIFc7017845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:18:14 EDT --- php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092218.n49MILsk024373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:18:20 EDT --- php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092223.n49MNaAJ018742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-09 18:23:34 EDT --- Okay, I'm the new maintainer of giflib, please review 4.1.6-2 from CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092231.n49MVF3j026703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:31:14 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092229.n49MTqei026217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:29:51 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092234.n49MYEep020335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:34:13 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092234.n49MY8mI020307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:34:08 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092232.n49MW3kg020172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:32:02 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092234.n49MY3TW026895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 18:34:02 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 22:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 18:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092248.n49Mmoox028915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 --- Comment #24 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-09 18:48:49 EDT --- Thank you everyone. Now built in F-10, F-11, F-12. Still waiting on EL-5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 23:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092303.n49N3ptv031170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-09 19:03:51 EDT --- SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dvtm-0.5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dvtm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100005.n4A0549B006475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:05:04 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100008.n4A083cx000698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:08:02 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unoconv-0.3-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100007.n4A07NP6000646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:07:22 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unoconv-0.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100006.n4A06fLg000602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:06:40 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/unoconv-0.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 23:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092358.n49NwB1c005280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 19:58:10 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 23:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092356.n49NuKJV031430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 19:56:19 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 23:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092357.n49NvJ61031498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 19:57:18 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:04:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:04:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100004.n4A04Nx9032377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:04:23 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100003.n4A03fXG032330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:03:40 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100002.n4A02Clt005923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:02:11 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 9 23:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 19:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905092359.n49NxHqf031631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 19:59:16 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100001.n4A01S7s005849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:01:27 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100051.n4A0puPK012193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:51:55 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.21.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100052.n4A0quLW012318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:52:56 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.21.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 00:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 20:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100053.n4A0rpZv012377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-09 20:53:50 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rmol-0.21.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 01:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 21:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100147.n4A1lpkv012875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #9 from David Sugar 2009-05-09 21:47:50 EDT --- The sipwitch.py issue is partially related to swig, since it is generated by swig. I changed the patch to install using INSTALL_DATA, and maybe I will need to set explicit attrib too? I will test this a bit here... I see now yes, "upstart" based debian/ubuntu only have /etc/init.d, where rh/fedora symlink it to /etc/rc.d/init.d. In the next upstream release I am adding --with-initrddir option for configure, but for the current release, I will use your hack... The stop-start-daemon issue gets to the heart of some init scripting differences between debian & rh. I am not sure if this is best solved with a patch, since init scripts dont change much, so that would not be too hard to maintain, or to have an entirely separate source1 just to take along a fedora/rh specific init script. I have already worked on the other changes, and once I test them and resolve the debian vs rh init script issues remaining, I will do a new update. Probably I will go for extending the patch for now. Incidentally, if gcrypt is not used, sipwitch falls back to openssl libcrypto. This in fact should have been preferred since libeXosip2 already links in openssl, but it seems to fail to detect libcrypto support (even for md5), and that is strange. Also I tested mostly with the gcrypt crypto functions, so it is probably safer to keep using those for now. Anyway, at some point we all should try to converge on nss based stuff :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 02:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 22:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100212.n4A2CRDn016299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #10 from David Sugar 2009-05-09 22:12:26 EDT --- rpmlint on sipwitch binary rpm itself: sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sipwitch.conf 0660 sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sipwitch.d/lab.xml 0660 sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/sipwitch 0660 sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sipwitch.d/tests.xml 0660 sipwitch.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/sipwitch.d 0770 In fact, I do NOT want those files to be "world" readable...and I do want them to be group and user r/w. So I feel these are actually correct, not error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 02:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 22:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] New: Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 Summary: Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: icon at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/textroom.spec SRPM URL: http://icon.fedorapeople.org/f/textroom-0.5.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: TextRoom and all other similar editors share one goal: to get you writing right away by providing distraction free environment to your liking, as well as familiar set of keyboard shortcuts to control its behavior. If you don't feel comfortable already with your editor of choice, you may find it useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 02:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 9 May 2009 22:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100245.n4A2jJ4l027225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-09 22:45:17 EDT --- Any word from upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 04:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 00:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100418.n4A4I3f9001653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-10 00:18:01 EDT --- Hello: (In reply to comment #9) > The sipwitch.py issue is partially related to swig, since it is generated by > swig. I changed the patch to install using INSTALL_DATA, and maybe I will need > to set explicit attrib too? I will test this a bit here... - For this just using %attr(...) or using chmod at %install is enough. > Incidentally, if gcrypt is not used, sipwitch falls back to openssl libcrypto. > This in fact should have been preferred since libeXosip2 already links in > openssl, but it seems to fail to detect libcrypto support (even for md5), and > that is strange. Also I tested mostly with the gcrypt crypto functions, so it > is probably safer to keep using those for now. Anyway, at some point we all > should try to converge on nss based stuff :). - Well, on rawhide libeXosip2 is not linked against openssl library. Note that this is under GPLv3+, and strictly speaking openssl license conflicts with GPL (any version): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 04:20:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 00:20:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100420.n4A4KKsJ008469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-10 00:20:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > rpmlint on sipwitch binary rpm itself: > > sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sipwitch.conf 0660 > sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sipwitch.d/lab.xml 0660 > sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/sipwitch 0660 > sipwitch.i386: E: non-readable /etc/sipwitch.d/tests.xml 0660 > sipwitch.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/sipwitch.d 0770 > > In fact, I do NOT want those files to be "world" readable...and I do want them > to be group and user r/w. So I feel these are actually correct, not error. - rpmlint always complains about these types of permission/attributes, however we usually ignores these "errors" if there is enough reason (By the way, there is no difference for this case, however I prefer "0640" or "0750" permission) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 05:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 01:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100523.n4A5NFdJ016638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-10 01:23:14 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 06:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 02:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100652.n4A6qdHl022366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-10 02:52:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343247) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343247) ghc-rpm-macros-6.patch Bah, we forgot to run rpmlint on ghc-rpm-macros.noarch. This fixes: ghc-rpm-macros.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rpm/macros.ghc and simplifies the changelog. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 06:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 02:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100656.n4A6uKvu022960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 02:56:19 EDT --- built in rawdhide - waiting for perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish on branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100706.n4A76sK8030716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-10 03:06:53 EDT --- This is a simple packaging of macros.ghc which is currently bundled with the main large ghc package. Here is the review: +:ok, !:needs attention, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint output [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [NA] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [NA] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [NA] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [!] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. %config taken care of by patch 6 above [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [NA] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. Please apply the attached fix for the rpmlint warning. Package is APPROVED by petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100708.n4A78soO030848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-10 03:08:53 EDT --- Once the package is imported and built, I will remove macros.ghc from ghc/devel and then update the templates in cabal2spec to BR this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100712.n4A7C41j031499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 03:12:03 EDT --- built in rawhide - waiting for perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath on branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100724.n4A7OK6o026453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100724.n4A7ONxa026487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:29:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100729.n4A7TcuQ001274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bernie at codewiz.org --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-10 03:29:34 EDT --- *** Bug 458643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100729.n4A7Ta4V001241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #25 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-10 03:29:34 EDT --- Opened a new review with a completely rewritten SPEC file. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500013 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 07:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 03:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] New: Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Summary: Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: felix at fetzig.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/dansguardian-2.10.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: DansGuardian filters the content of pages based on many methods including phrase matching, PICS filtering and URL filtering. It does not purely filter based on a banned list of sites. It provides real-time virus scanning capabilities for content access. DansGuardian is designed to be completely flexible and allows you to tailor the filtering to your exact needs. It can be as draconian or as unobstructive as you want. The default settings are geared towards what a primary school might want but DansGuardian puts you in control of what you want to block. DansGuardian requires squid or another similar caching proxy server on your local network. ---- [felix at polaris result]$ rpmlint dansguardian-* dansguardian.spec dansguardian 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 08:40:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 04:40:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100840.n4A8eXPs013610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #15 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-10 04:40:32 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka Your diff file seems not to be patched into the source code. the terminal showed me that: [fedora at fedora-desktop SPECS]$ rpmbuild -ba perl-Goo-Canvas.spec Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PE41w0 + umask 022 + cd /home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD + cd /home/fedora/rpmbuild/BUILD + rm -rf Goo-Canvas-0.05 + /usr/bin/gzip -dc /home/fedora/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Goo-Canvas-0.05.tar.gz + /bin/tar -xf - + STATUS=0 + '[' 0 -ne 0 ']' + cd Goo-Canvas-0.05 + /bin/chmod -Rf a+rX,u+w,g-w,o-w . + echo 'Patch #0 (perltetris_pl-undefined.diff):' Patch #0 (perltetris_pl-undefined.diff): + /bin/cat /home/fedora/rpmbuild/SOURCES/perltetris_pl-undefined.diff + /usr/bin/patch -s -p1 --fuzz=0 missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |--- perltetris.pl.orig 2009-04-23 03:22:43.000000000 +0900 |+++ perltetris.pl 2009-04-25 03:34:38.000000000 +0900 -------------------------- File to patch: The process is still stopping at here until I press Ctrl+C. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 08:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 04:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100851.n4A8pNhW015122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |emmanuel.seyman at club-intern | |et.fr --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-05-10 04:51:22 EDT --- Unofficial review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). x rpmlint is NOT silent for SRPM and for RPM. rpmlint redmine-0.8.3-5.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint redmine-0.8.3-5.fc11.noarch.rpm gives 124 errors and 1 warning. The errors are of the types: * htaccess-file * non-executable-script * script-without-shebang * version-control-internal-file * wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding * zero-length Please fix these or explain why they should be ignored. + source files match upstream url 52946a1b310e891da6613e8c7b429043 redmine-0.8.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. ? Spec file is legible. I'm unsure that "http://www.%{name}.org" falls in the legible category. I'll let an official reviewer decide on this. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. Note that redmine seems to be licensed under GPLv2 or later while your spec file says "GPLv2". I'm guessing you should use "GPLv2+" + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. x Macro use appears rather consistent. Your %install reads: %{__rm} -rf %{buildroot} while your %clean uses: rm -rf %{buildroot} Please use one or the other but not both. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. x file permissions are appropriate. See rpmlint output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 09:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100900.n4A90UeC009733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-10 05:00:30 EDT --- Please check the header of the patch, not -p1 patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 09:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492165] Review Request: rotoscope - A free rotoscoping application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100908.n4A985ck010946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-10 05:08:04 EDT --- again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 09:10:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:10:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100910.n4A9A0o9017638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-10 05:09:58 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 09:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100914.n4A9ELsq018398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-10 05:14:20 EDT --- OK - rpmlint output 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - The spec file name must match the base package %{name} OK - The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines OK - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK - The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines (license is GPLv3+) NA - Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun OK - The package MUST successfully compile and build koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1344884 OK - The spec file must be written in American English. OK - The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. bf2b5cd4ce82a9b851ed51529621d3eef6b09408 rpmdepsize-1.0.tar.gz NA - The spec file MUST handle locales properly (no translations) NA - package not relocatable OK - A package must own all directories that it creates OK - A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings OK - Permissions on files must be set properly OK - Each package must have a %clean section OK - Each package must consistently use macros == you could use %{name} when removing execstack and in %files too OK - The package must contain code, or permissable content (no content) NA - Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage (no large doc) OK - If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application NA - Header files must be in a -devel package (no devel package) NA - Static libraries must be in a -static package (no static package) NA - Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' OK - Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives NEEDSWORK - Packages containing GUI applications MUST include a .desktop file == there's no desktop file OK - No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK - At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} OK - All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 OK - The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK - %{?dist} tag is used in release Hello Jussi, if you add the desktop file i think we are done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 09:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100915.n4A9FPpV012261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |guido.grazioli at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 09:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 05:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905100957.n4A9vtK4019147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #9 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-10 05:57:54 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka I have fixed the problems and tried to build it on koji build system. It is OK and it does not appear any errors. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 10:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 06:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101014.n4AAET1Q021714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 06:14:29 EDT --- - You still need to fix the SourceURL line. - Also, I'd use %{_javadir}/%{name}.jar and %{_javadocdir}/%{name}/ instead of using %{_javadir}/* %{_javadocdir}/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 10:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 06:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-WebKit - MinGW Windows web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101024.n4AAOSDS029213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-10 06:24:27 EDT --- The native package is now built from a SRPM called webkitgtk, the MinGW package should probably be based on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 10:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 06:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents Alias: perl-HTML-Defang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/HTML-Defang/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-Defang.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module accepts an input HTML and/or CSS string and removes any executable code including scripting, embedded objects, applets, etc., and neutralises any XSS attacks. A whitelist based approach is used which means only HTML known to be safe is allowed through. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346126 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 11:03:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:03:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101103.n4AB3AnN028641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 11:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation Alias: perl-XML-Atom https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Atom/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-Atom.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Atom is a syndication, API, and archiving format for weblogs and other data. XML::Atom implements the feed format as well as a client for the API. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346128 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 11:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101102.n4AB2lgA028596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 07:02:46 EDT --- - Install also the other .desktop file that adds the mime type. Remember to add updating of desktop cache as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database ** rpmlint output: textroom.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.3 ['0.5.3-1.fc10', '0.5.3-1'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - You're missing the release -1 from the changelog. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add CHANGELOG and README to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. NEEDSFIX - Install also the other .desktop file. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 11:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons Alias: perl-Text-Emoticon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Emoticon/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Emoticon.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Text::Emoticon is a factory class to dispatch MSN/YIM emoticon set. It's made to become handy to be used in other applications like Kwiki/MT plugins. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346132 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 11:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] New: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST Alias: perl-Net-Amazon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Summary: Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Net-Amazon/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Net-Amazon.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Net::Amazon provides an object-oriented interface to amazon.com's REST interface. This way it's possible to create applications using Amazon's vast amount of data via a functional interface, without having to worry about the underlying communication mechanism. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346130 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 12:22:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 08:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-View-Mason/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-View-Mason.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Want to use a Mason component in your Catalyst views? No problem! Catalyst::View::Mason comes to the rescue. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346168 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 13:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458643] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101313.n4ADDt4Y016467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 13:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468753] Review Request: nss-myhostname - glibc plugin for local system host name resolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101330.n4ADUr1c025515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468753 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Lennart Poettering 2009-05-10 09:30:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nss-myhostname Short Description: glibc plugin for local system host name resolution Owners: lennart Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 13:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101330.n4ADUK2k025446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-05-10 09:30:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: devtodo Short Description: Manage a hierarchical, prioritized list of outstanding tasks Owners: bernie Branches: F-11 InitialCC: bernie -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 14:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 10:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101426.n4AEQPRX027100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #5 from James Bowes 2009-05-10 10:26:25 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg.spec SRPM URL: http://jbowes.fedorapeople.org/rpms/gitg-0.0.3-1.fc10.src.rpm - %{buildroot} changed to $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - ChangeLog added to %doc - INSTALL="install -p" used for make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 14:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 10:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101433.n4AEXjDj001740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-10 10:33:43 EDT --- > - Add executable flags to the non-executable-script files, that way at the end > you only get 3 devel-file-in-non-devel-package warnings that cannot be > circumvented. > - Package does not install. This is caused by > peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct:#! /bin/octave -qf > in which /bin/octave should be /usr/bin/octave. The requirement on octave is, > however, quite odd. The package also requires csh and ksh due to the example > files. I'd sed the shebangs out of those files, since at least octave pulls in > a lot of stuff. removing shebangs of all files should do the trick to clear both. -- build.log -- + sed -e 1d -i peppy/editra/tests/c-shell_script.csh peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct peppy/editra/tests/perl.pl peppy/editra/tests/ruby.rb peppy/editra/tests/d.d peppy/editra/tests/tcl_tk.tcl peppy/editra/tests/korn_shell_script.ksh peppy/editra/tests/python.python > - Add -O1 to the setup.py install arguments. -- build.log -- + python setup.py install -01 --skip-build --root /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc11.i386 /usr/lib/python2.6/distutils/dist.py:266: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'zip_safe' warnings.warn(msg) /usr/lib/python2.6/distutils/dist.py:266: UserWarning: Unknown distribution option: 'windows' warnings.warn(msg) packages = ['peppy', 'peppy.yapsy', 'peppy.editra', 'peppy.editra.eclib', 'peppy.editra.syntax', 'peppy.i18n', 'peppy.lib', 'peppy.plugins', 'peppy.vfs', 'peppy.vfs.itools', 'peppy.vfs.itools.uri', 'peppy.vfs.itools.vfs', 'peppy.actions', 'peppy.hsi'] usage: setup.py [global_opts] cmd1 [cmd1_opts] [cmd2 [cmd2_opts] ...] or: setup.py --help [cmd1 cmd2 ...] or: setup.py --help-commands or: setup.py cmd --help error: option -0 not recognized > - The line > mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/{applications,pixmaps} > is not needed since both desktop-file-install and install -D create the > directories. -- build.log -- + desktop-file-install --dir=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc11.i386//usr/share/applications/ /builddir/build/SOURCES/peppy.desktop + install -Dpm0644 /builddir/build/SOURCES/peppy.png /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc11.i386//usr/share/pixmaps/ install: target `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc11.i386//usr/share/pixmaps/' is not a directory: No such file or directory > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. NEEDSFIX > - You are mixing $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot}. This is not allowed: choose > one and stick with it. oops > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Add also PKG-INFO to %doc. k > - Don't refer to "I" or "me" in the %description. I removed this part completely > - Add Requires: python-enchant to get the spell checking part working. spell checking is a damn bitch. I hate it. But okay, for the most users this is an important "feature". Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/peppy-0.9.27/peppy.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/peppy-0.9.27/peppy-0.9.27-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 14:55:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 10:55:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101455.n4AEtl0A031172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #13 from David Sugar 2009-05-10 10:55:46 EDT --- I actually wrote a patch (for upstream) to make openssl optional in exosip2 at configure awhile back. Yes, openssl licensing is...rather problematic. And nss has fips certification. I am doing another upstream patch for exosip2 upstream related to terminating with reason, and maybe I will try to also substitute nss in it as well then. I also often hear "openssl" falls under the "system library exception", a rather uncertain assertion though perhaps a bit easier to say on BSD. I re-wrote the init script in a generic way for the next upstream release, and have used that as a patch for this one, hence the patch file is updated and should solve these other issues. I now understand how condrestart relates to updates, and it makes a lot of sense to me. In debian, I did it an uglier way though achieving the same effect. I also replaced $(INSTALL) sipwitch.py with $(INSTALL_DATA) in the patch and that cleared the exec permission problem, since sipwitch.py generated by swig has no #! and should not be marked execute. I use 0660/0770 because I often create an "admin" group for the daemon, and users of that group have to be able to modify config, write the control fifo, etc. Perhaps that process should occur automatically in pre/post scripts and be "standardized"? Anyway here is what I have now: Updated Spec: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.spec Updated SRPM: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Updated Patch: http://www.gnutelephony.org/specs/sipwitch.patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101521.n4AFLcfp008852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-10 11:21:37 EDT --- bauble doesn't work in F11 I contacted upstream. $ bauble WARNING: ConnectionManager: No module named psycopg2 WARNING: ConnectionManager: No module named MySQLdb (bauble:5155): libglade-WARNING **: Error loading image: Datei ?/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/bauble_logo.png? konnte nicht ge?ffnet werden: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden (bauble:5155): libglade-WARNING **: could not convert string to type `GdkPixbuf' for property `pixbuf' /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/__init__.py:292: SADeprecationWarning: The 'transactional' argument to sessionmaker() is deprecated; use autocommit=True|False instead. Session = sessionmaker(bind=engine, autoflush=False,transactional=True) pluginmgr.py(536): Could not import the bauble.plugins.report module. __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'private' pluginmgr.py(537): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/pluginmgr.py", line 532, in _find_plugins mod = __import__(name, globals(), locals(), [name], -1) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/report/__init__.py", line 28, in from bauble.plugins.tag import Tag File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/tag/__init__.py", line 245, in backref='tag', private=True)}, File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sqlalchemy/orm/__init__.py", line 419, in relation return RelationProperty(argument, secondary=secondary, **kwargs) TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'private' pluginmgr.py(536): Could not import the bauble.plugins.report.default module. Table 'tag' is already defined for this MetaData instance. Specify 'useexisting=True' to redefine options and columns on an existing Table object. pluginmgr.py(537): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/pluginmgr.py", line 532, in _find_plugins mod = __import__(name, globals(), locals(), [name], -1) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/report/__init__.py", line 28, in from bauble.plugins.tag import Tag File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/tag/__init__.py", line 202, in Column('tag', Unicode(64), unique=True, nullable=False)) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sqlalchemy/schema.py", line 104, in __call__ "columns on an existing Table object." % key) InvalidRequestError: Table 'tag' is already defined for this MetaData instance. Specify 'useexisting=True' to redefine options and columns on an existing Table object. pluginmgr.py(536): Could not import the bauble.plugins.tag module. Table 'tag' is already defined for this MetaData instance. Specify 'useexisting=True' to redefine options and columns on an existing Table object. pluginmgr.py(537): Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/pluginmgr.py", line 532, in _find_plugins mod = __import__(name, globals(), locals(), [name], -1) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/bauble/plugins/tag/__init__.py", line 202, in Column('tag', Unicode(64), unique=True, nullable=False)) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sqlalchemy/schema.py", line 104, in __call__ "columns on an existing Table object." % key) InvalidRequestError: Table 'tag' is already defined for this MetaData instance. Specify 'useexisting=True' to redefine options and columns on an existing Table object. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101539.n4AFdAbV004569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101537.n4AFbxZb004484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101538.n4AFceWY011029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101539.n4AFdYnh011114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101539.n4AFd0aw011068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:00:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:00:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101600.n4AG0HnI014352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-10 12:00:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346126 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url cddcc61fd9dba2746267d54c96b5d2e52c72d705 HTML-Defang-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=559, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.17 usr 0.02 sys + 0.84 cusr 0.07 csys = 1.10 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::Defang) Requires: perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(bytes) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 15:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 11:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101559.n4AFxwjG007500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 11:59:57 EDT --- Even though you didn't increment the release tag as you should have, the package has been APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101601.n4AG1OIF008017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-10 12:01:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346132 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c18cb2d67eec4b32752b05b6e30a12ca1fabb503 Text-Emoticon-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=3, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.16 CPU) + Package perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc12.noarch Provides: perl(Text::Emoticon) = 0.04 Requires: perl(UNIVERSAL::require) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101604.n4AG4f9I008230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 12:04:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > - Add -O1 to the setup.py install arguments. > error: option -0 not recognized -O1 not -01. > > > > - The line > > mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/{applications,pixmaps} > > is not needed since both desktop-file-install and install -D create the > > directories. > + install -Dpm0644 /builddir/build/SOURCES/peppy.png > /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc11.i386//usr/share/pixmaps/ > install: target > `/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/peppy-0.9.27-1.fc11.i386//usr/share/pixmaps/' is not > a directory: No such file or directory If you use install -Dpm0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png it works. ** Doesn't build: + sed -e -i 1d peppy/editra/tests/c-shell_script.csh peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct peppy/editra/ tests/perl.pl peppy/editra/tests/ruby.rb peppy/editra/tests/d.d peppy/editra/tests/tcl_tk.tcl pe ppy/editra/tests/korn_shell_script.ksh peppy/editra/tests/python.python sed: -e expression #1, char 1: unknown command: `-' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:08:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:08:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101608.n4AG83MM008849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-10 12:08:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346168 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 260a485796d29a6f06a80a699db85e050982622d Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=19, Tests=82, 13 wallclock secs ( 0.14 usr 0.04 sys + 11.25 cusr 0.82 csys = 12.25 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Helper::View::Mason) = 0.13 perl(Catalyst::View::Mason) = 0.17 Requires: perl(File::Spec) perl(HTML::Mason) perl(MRO::Compat) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101607.n4AG7SA6008784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-10 12:07:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346128 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url aba19002bcfbc22f6e1ea7c5a0561bc04ef85740 XML-Atom-0.35.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=287, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.16 usr 0.05 sys + 4.24 cusr 0.41 csys = 4.86 CPU) + Package perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(LWP::UserAgent::AtomClient) perl(XML::Atom) = 0.35 perl(XML::Atom::Base) perl(XML::Atom::Category) perl(XML::Atom::Client) perl(XML::Atom::Content) perl(XML::Atom::Entry) perl(XML::Atom::ErrorHandler) perl(XML::Atom::Feed) perl(XML::Atom::Link) perl(XML::Atom::Namespace) perl(XML::Atom::Person) perl(XML::Atom::Server) perl(XML::Atom::Thing) perl(XML::Atom::Util) Requires: perl >= 0:5.008_001 perl(DateTime) perl(Digest::SHA1) perl(Encode) perl(Exporter) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(XML::Atom) perl(XML::Atom::Category) perl(XML::Atom::Content) perl(XML::Atom::Entry) perl(XML::Atom::Feed) perl(XML::Atom::Link) perl(XML::Atom::Person) perl(XML::Atom::Util) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) suggestions: 1)do you really need following? BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.8.1 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:14:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:14:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101614.n4AGECIF009764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #17 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-10 12:14:11 EDT --- How should I use your patch? I really do not know. I find that line 3 and line 12 of the patch lack something, Could you help me? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101614.n4AGE7h2009719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-10 12:14:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1344790 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 6d208cf97e1818052c65f8685d12faa6b1b6a74f HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=60, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.02 sys + 0.40 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.49 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(HTML::WikiConverter::Markdown) = 0.05 Requires: perl(HTML::Entities) perl(HTML::Tagset) perl(Params::Validate) perl(URI) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101610.n4AGA7IY009327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-10 12:10:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346130 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 666b46d46bafb252b86c9462a29b4610cfdc8ca6 Net-Amazon-0.50.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=23, Tests=336, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.07 sys + 7.85 cusr 0.67 csys = 8.80 CPU) + Package perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Net::Amazon) = 0.50 perl(Net::Amazon::Attribute::Review) perl(Net::Amazon::Attribute::ReviewSet) perl(Net::Amazon::Property) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::Book) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::CE) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::DVD) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::Music) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::Software) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::VideoGames) perl(Net::Amazon::Request) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::ASIN) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Blended) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Exchange) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::ISBN) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Keyword) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Seller) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Similar) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::TextStream) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::UPC) perl(Net::Amazon::Request::Wishlist) perl(Net::Amazon::Response) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::ASIN) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Blended) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Exchange) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::ISBN) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Keyword) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Seller) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Similar) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::TextStream) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::UPC) perl(Net::Amazon::Response::Wishlist) perl(Net::Amazon::Result::Seller) perl(Net::Amazon::Result::Seller::Listing) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::AudienceRating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Brand) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Composer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Condition) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Conductor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Count) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::ItemPage) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Keywords) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::MaximumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::MerchantId) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::MinimumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Sort) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::ca::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::AudienceRating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Availability) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Brand) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Composer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Condition) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Conductor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Count) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::DeliveryMethod) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Format) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::ISPUPostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::ItemPage) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Keywords) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::MPAARating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Magazines) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::MaximumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::MerchantId) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::MinimumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Orchestra) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Performer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::PostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Sort) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::State) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::TextStream) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::de::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::AudienceRating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Availability) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Brand) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Composer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Condition) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Conductor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Count) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::DeliveryMethod) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Format) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::ISPUPostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::ItemPage) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Keywords) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Magazines) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::MaximumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::MerchantId) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::MinimumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Orchestra) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Performer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::PostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Sort) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::State) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::fr::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::AudienceRating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Availability) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Brand) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Composer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Condition) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Conductor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Count) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::DeliveryMethod) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Format) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::ISPUPostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::ItemPage) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Keywords) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Magazines) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::MaximumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::MerchantId) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::MinimumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Orchestra) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Performer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::PostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Sort) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::State) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::TextStream) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::jp::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::AudienceRating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Availability) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Brand) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Composer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Condition) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Conductor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Count) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::DeliveryMethod) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::EAN) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Format) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::ISPUPostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::ItemPage) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Keywords) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Magazines) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::MaximumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::MerchantId) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::MinimumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Orchestra) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Performer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::PostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Sort) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::State) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::TextStream) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::uk::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Actor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Artist) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::AudienceRating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Author) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Availability) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Brand) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::BrowseNode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::City) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Composer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Condition) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Conductor) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Count) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Director) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Format) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::ItemPage) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Keyword) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Keywords) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::MPAARating) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Magazines) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Manufacturer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::MaximumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::MerchantId) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::MinimumPrice) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::MusicLabel) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Neighborhood) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Orchestra) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Performer) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::PostalCode) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Power) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Publisher) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Sort) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::State) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::TextStream) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::Title) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch::us::UPC) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::BrowseNodeLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CartAdd) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CartClear) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CartCreate) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CartGet) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CartModify) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CustomerContentLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::CustomerContentSearch) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::Help) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::ItemLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::ItemSearch) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::ListLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::ListSearch) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::SellerListingLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::SellerListingSearch) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::SellerLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::SimilarityLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::TagLookup) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type::TransactionLookup) Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(Data::Dumper) perl(HTTP::Request::Common) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Net::Amazon::Attribute::Review) perl(Net::Amazon::Attribute::ReviewSet) perl(Net::Amazon::Property) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::Book) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::CE) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::DVD) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::Music) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::Software) perl(Net::Amazon::Property::VideoGames) perl(Net::Amazon::Result::Seller) perl(Net::Amazon::Result::Seller::Listing) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::ItemSearch) perl(Net::Amazon::Validate::Type) perl(Text::Wrap) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(URI) perl(XML::Simple) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101630.n4AGUunG012466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-10 12:30:55 EDT --- Nice .... you are already put up a review ... I also spent some time .. in packaging it .. and later found a review already there. Here is my SPEC and SRPM .. in case it is of any help. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/crunchyfrog.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/crunchyfrog-0.3.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101642.n4AGg816020231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101642.n4AGg6NW020206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 12:42:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown Short Description: Convert HTML to Markdown markup Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101646.n4AGk5L8020989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 12:46:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason Short Description: Mason View Class Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101646.n4AGk7rv021017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101644.n4AGiXXJ020440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 12:44:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Atom Short Description: Atom feed and API implementation Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101643.n4AGhRCU020375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101645.n4AGjW08020930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101643.n4AGhPER020348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 12:43:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-Defang Short Description: Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101644.n4AGigwt020474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 12:44:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Net-Amazon Short Description: Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101644.n4AGiasu014186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101644.n4AGijm2014214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101645.n4AGjOfw014584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 12:45:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Emoticon Short Description: Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 16:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101657.n4AGva1R016274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-10 12:57:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > -O1 not -01. aah, okay :-) > If you use > install -Dpm0644 %{SOURCE2} %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png > it works. okay. I learned a new thing :-) > Doesn't build: > + sed -e -i 1d peppy/editra/tests/c-shell_script.csh > peppy/editra/tests/octave.oct peppy/editra/ > tests/perl.pl peppy/editra/tests/ruby.rb peppy/editra/tests/d.d > peppy/editra/tests/tcl_tk.tcl pe > ppy/editra/tests/korn_shell_script.ksh peppy/editra/tests/python.python > sed: -e expression #1, char 1: unknown command: `-' aaah sed -e '1d' -i instead of sed -e -i '1d' i built it with sed -e '1d' -i, don't know why i changed it. this was very stupid, sorry! Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/peppy-0.9.27/peppy.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/peppy-0.9.27/peppy-0.9.27-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101708.n4AH8ZJT024157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-10 13:08:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > But this is up to you. At least for desktop-file-validate I'd use wildcards > because you might forget to validate a file otherwise. desktop-file-validate does not support multiple desktop files on its command line, so it needs to be enclosed in a for loop. > Encoding should not be in the file, this is correct, but the rest of the file Why should it not be? We seem to have lots of desktop files having an Encoding entry (lots of gnome-*, eg.). > But there are other problems with the desktop files: > - /usr/bin is hardcoded in the Exec tag. Ether remove it or walk over it with Removed the hardcoded path. > - What is "X-Osso-Type=application/x-executable" meant for? Are these programs > supposed to open a mimetype? I guess not, at least not x-executable, but if so, > you need to follow This is needed for maemo. On Fedora, it can go, so removed the X- tags. SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-5.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101723.n4AHNXUC020312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-10 13:23:31 EDT --- Well, ------------------------------------------------------ This package (sipwitch) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------ Now please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process from "CVS admin requests" (also please write cvs admin request on ucommon review request) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101723.n4AHN60h020244@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-05-10 13:23:04 EDT --- REVIEW GUIDELINES FIX: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./ampache.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/ampache-3.5-6.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ampache-3.5-6.fc10.noarch.rpm ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_install_config.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/install.css ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_ip_history.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_random.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_access_rpc.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_lyrics.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_videos.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_search.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_object_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user_activate.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_random_rules.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/sidebar_home.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_artist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_xspf_player.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_artist_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_access.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_controllers.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_songs.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_similar_artists.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/subnavbar.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_play_selected.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_shout.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_export.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/rightbar.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_rename_artist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_create_democratic.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_test.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_user.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_access_local.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_all_popular.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_genres.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_stats.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_shout.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_flag.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_edit_instance.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_alphabet_form.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_embed_xspf.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_album.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_access_current.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playtype_switch.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_install_lang.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_user.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_duplicates.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_song.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user_preferences.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/sidebar_modules.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_genre.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_account.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_random_albums.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_live_stream.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_video_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_users.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_flag_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_manage_democratic.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_install_check.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_import_playlist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_objects.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_playlist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_confirmation.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_album_art.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_live_streams.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_preference_admin.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_status.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/csshover2.htc ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_artist_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_album.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_install.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_live_stream_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_catalogs.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_flagged.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_disabled_songs.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_album_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_object_rating_static.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_now_playing_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_manage_catalogs.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_song_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_big_art.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_democratic_playlist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_search_options.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_debug.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_catalog.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_catalog_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_democratic.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user_stats.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_tagcloud.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/sidebar_preferences.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_plugins.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_access.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_artist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user_registration.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_adds_catalog.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_box_bottom.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_popular.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_access_list.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/sidebar_localplay.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_index.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_admin_tools.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_run_add_catalog.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_albums.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playlist_song_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_stats_newest.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playlist_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_mail_users.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_denied.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_verify_catalog.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_stats_popular.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_add_playlist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_test_config.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_preferences.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_get_albumart.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_user_recommendations.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_control.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/header.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playlist.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_playlist_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/javascript_refresh.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_song_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/sidebar_admin.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_registration_confirmation.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playlists.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_newest.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_gather_art.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playlist_songs.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_search_bar.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_install_account.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_dynamic.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_live_stream_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_artists.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_shoutbox.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/list_header.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_box_top.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_manage_shoutbox.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_song.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_preference_box.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_clean_catalog.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_admin_info.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/base.css ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_shout_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_login_form.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/sidebar.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_playlist_song_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/footer.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_now_playing.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_add_instance.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_album_row.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_recently_played.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_localplay_instances.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_playlist_edit.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/print.css ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_edit_catalog.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_update_items.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_object_rating.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_live_stream.inc.php ampache.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /var/www/ampache/templates/show_duplicate.inc.php ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/sort_files.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/sort_files.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/sort_files.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/sort_files.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/dump_album_art.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/dump_album_art.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/dump_album_art.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/dump_album_art.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/write_tags.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/write_tags.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/write_tags.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/write_tags.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/fix_filenames.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/fix_filenames.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/fix_filenames.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/fix_filenames.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/migrate_config.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/migrate_config.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/migrate_config.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/migrate_config.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/delete_disabled.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/delete_disabled.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/delete_disabled.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/delete_disabled.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh 0644 ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/themes/vegas/templates/default.css ampache.noarch: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding /var/www/ampache/themes/vegas/templates/default.css ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/themes/vegas/temp_images/drawing.svg ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ampache apache ampache.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ampache-3.5/ampache.sql ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/write_playlists.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/write_playlists.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/write_playlists.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/write_playlists.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/print_tags.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/print_tags.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/print_tags.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/print_tags.inc ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /var/www/ampache/bin/catalog_update.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /var/www/ampache/bin/catalog_update.inc 0700 ampache.noarch: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /var/www/ampache/bin/catalog_update.inc ampache.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /var/www/ampache/bin/catalog_update.inc ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ampache.cfg apache ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ampache.cfg 0640 ampache.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ampache 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 41 errors, 160 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Package has GPLv2 license in docs and several php files contain GPLv2 at the top. OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. spec file indicates gplv2, which several source files and copy of gplv2 in docs agree with. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum ampache-3.5.tar.gz* 9c3d4f6c11e0743eb0747ac910542aee ampache-3.5.tar.gz 9c3d4f6c11e0743eb0747ac910542aee ampache-3.5.tar.gz.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346322 NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. No real build section (it's blank) so no buildrequires needed. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. FIX: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. While you have defattr - I think perms are what's generating alot of the errors above. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. I think you could put a few additional macros - for instance in the source0 line, you don't use %{name} but do use %{version} I personally think that not using macros on that line makes reviews faster, but no reason to not include both macros, but that strikes me as more of a preference than a blocker. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I see that you have a couple of themes tossed in, these are also GPLv2 and come from ampache, but curious as to why not break them out into a subpackage. I am not necessarily suggesting that you need to, just curious as to the reason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101735.n4AHZsUq028346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-05-10 13:35:53 EDT --- One such package is: http://pear.php.net/package/Text_Wiki/ Which is in the wiki engine. While you are correct in that it's not verbatim. They have at least deleted some files from source, but it appears that the files that came with the original package. For those packages with changes, the proper course of action I think is to ask upstream to submit their patches upstream. If it's more of a complete rewrite, that may be a problem. I have not gone through and checked each separate package for changes, but it's probably worth talking to upstream about. The above package would probably need to be packaged separately. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448458] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101741.n4AHfXi9029225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448458 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Depends on| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(russell at coker.com | |.au) | --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-05-10 13:41:31 EDT --- It's been a couple weeks - and no response. I'll start working on repackaging this shortly. Closing notabug and blocking FE-DEADREVIEW per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews#Submitter_not_responding -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:52:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] New: Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Summary: Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libplist.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libplist-0.12.0-1.20090510gite925e6f.fc11.src.rpm libplist is a Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 17:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 13:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101759.n4AHxLtM031846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-10 13:59:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Why should it not be? We seem to have lots of desktop files having an Encoding > entry (lots of gnome-*, eg.). Because it got removed from freedesktop specs a while ago. Now it is assumed now that files are UTF-8 by default. Yes, there are lots of old files left in Fedora and we should clean them up in the future, but we should not let anything enter Fedora when it's not following the specs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101801.n4AI1qBl026024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 14:01:51 EDT --- rpmlint output: peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/c.c peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/cpp.cpp peppy.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/editra/tests/caml.ml 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. These are OK, requires are sane too. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101814.n4AIEqtq027783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101814.n4AIEZuH027745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-10 14:14:34 EDT --- Thank you Jussi New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: peppy Short Description: Editor written in python Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101836.n4AIarjS031590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-10 14:36:53 EDT --- No F-10?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101846.n4AIkNvW007051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-10 14:46:22 EDT --- Ok, so another update: SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-6.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101846.n4AIkbg5000614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-10 14:46:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: peppy Short Description: Editor written in python Owners: cassmodiah Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 18:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 14:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101858.n4AIwucs008687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-10 14:58:55 EDT --- Thanks for you feedback. I removed almost all the warnings/errors: [cascavel:~] rpmlint ampache ampache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh 0644 ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ampache apache ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ampache.cfg apache ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ampache.cfg 0640 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. I had a misplaced %config in the templates directory, which caused almost all of them. I included a logrotate file, and did some other clean ups. Regarding your question about the themes, I put them in the package, because I do not like ampache default theme, and they are small. Creating another package just for the themes seems to be an unnecessary work, and in general, people do not even know about the existence of a theme package. I also included my favourite theme now. Ampache does not really require these packages, but Requires(hint): xmms lame mp3splt was intended to add all of its functionality. But I think the hint is not just a hint. It will force the installation of all the three packages, and lame and mp3splt are not part of Fedora, because of licence issues. SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/ampache-3.5-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101902.n4AJ2EW1003097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-10 15:02:13 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPECE files matches with package name + Package contains valid License tag + License tag has LGPLv2+ as valid OSS license + Copyrith notes in source match with license tag + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package has several sub packages + Sub package has proper BRs and Req. + consistently usage of rpm macros Bad: - Local build doesn't works - Koji build fails The readme told me, that we need swig, but build fails even if I have added swig as an BR. Please see. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346448 - git-archive seem no to exist anymore, so please fix the comment how you have create th tar ball -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101902.n4AJ2j5N003162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101905.n4AJ5veB010094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 467237 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467237 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467237 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467237 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467237 depends on bug 453858, which changed state. Bug 453858 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-10 15:05:55 EDT --- Here is my review for this one: ? This is possibly an inconsistency: globus-gsi-credential package has BuildRequires: globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel >= 1 whereas this package has BuildRequires: globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel >= 5 Is this intentional? $ rpm -q globus-gsi-cert-utils globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10.x86_64 - rpmlint globus-gssapi-gsi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346454 ? library/ssl_locl.h contains a copy of BSD with advertising. Does that make this package "ASL 2.0 and BSD" ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468753] Review Request: nss-myhostname - glibc plugin for local system host name resolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101917.n4AJH5Re005241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468753 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:17:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101922.n4AJM4N1012525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:22:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:21:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:21:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101921.n4AJLJJG012430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:21:18 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101918.n4AJIAc8011792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:18:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101921.n4AJLMAm012451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-10 15:21:21 EDT --- > Bad: > - Local build doesn't works > - Koji build fails Looking at them now. > The readme told me, that we need swig, but build fails even > if I have added swig as an BR. Please see. I think its optional. > - git-archive seem no to exist anymore, so please fix the comment > how you have create th tar ball Well its still in Fedora 10 which is what I used to generate the tarball. I'll have a look to see what replaces it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101919.n4AJJopd005568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:19:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101922.n4AJMine012811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:22:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101925.n4AJPCkJ013305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:25:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101926.n4AJQ1Rb013528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:26:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101926.n4AJQkV9006989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-10 15:26:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] New: Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Summary: Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/postal.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/postal-0.70-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Postal suite consists of an SMTP delivery benchmark (postal), a POP retrieval benchmark (rabid) and a SMTP sink (bhm). It is designed to test mail servers and mail forwarding systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101949.n4AJnaBP016960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-10 15:49:35 EDT --- OK, the build is now working in koji (it was before for me locally), helpfully upstream have now also provided a release tarball :) SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libplist.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libplist-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346529 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101949.n4AJnItW016934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 19:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 15:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905101949.n4AJnfxg010216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-10 15:49:40 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPECE file matches with upstream + Package fullfit naming guidelines + URL tag show on proper project home page + Package contains most recent version of the application + Could download upstream tar ball with spectool -g + Tar ball in packages matches with upstream (md5sum: 15af44198d6a636190480122b8de7155) + Package contains valid license tag + License tag has LGPLV2+ and MIT as valid OSS Licenses + Package contains verbatin copy of the MIT license text + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Proper Buildroot definition + Buildroot will be cleaned on beginning of %clean and %install + Inclused patch is reliable + Local build works fine + Pacmage support SMP build + Rpmlint is quite for source rpm + Rpmlint is quite for binary rpm + Rpmlint is quite for Debuginfo rpm + Koji build works fine + Local install and uninstall works fine + Start of the application works fine. + Files has proper files perrmisions + %files stanza contains no duplicates + Package contains no files which belong to ohter packages + All packaged files are own by this package + %doc stanza is small, so no extra doc subpackage is needed + Package contains proper %Changelog Bad: - Wrong RPM Group. I think the aim of the application is not to emulate an other OS or system. - Sources contains no copyright notes. Please notify upstream to fix this issue. - Package only contains verbatin license text for the MIT license - Debuginfo package contains no sources - Package doesn't honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 20:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102047.n4AKlWkF025886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |mingw32-WebKit - MinGW |mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW |Windows web content engine |Windows web content engine |library |library --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-10 16:47:32 EDT --- This .spec file is based on the native WebKit package from just before the rename. I've renamed the package now to mingw32-webkitgtk and updated it to version 1.1.6 (the current version of the native package), but I can't get it compiled yet because upstream has added a dependency on enchant which we don't have packaged in our mingw toolchain yet. I'll try to package mingw32-enchant ASAP and also put it up for review. New Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 20:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 16:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102059.n4AKxYC2020424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #2 from david.hannequin at gmail.com 2009-05-10 16:59:34 EDT --- New version with correction of comment 1. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine-0.8.3-5.fc10.src.rpm Description: Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 21:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 17:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102125.n4ALPqQJ031929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org --- Comment #30 from Ian Weller 2009-05-10 17:25:49 EDT --- It would be awesome if you could build this for F-10 as well, especially since you branched for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 22:05:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:05:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102205.n4AM5DW4005505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 David Sugar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 22:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102204.n4AM4otJ005127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #19 from David Sugar 2009-05-10 18:04:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ucommon Short Description: Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets Owners: dyfet Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 22:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102210.n4AMAwbR031150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 David Sugar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from David Sugar 2009-05-10 18:10:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sipwitch Short Description: SIP telephony server for secure phone systems Owners: dyfet Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 22:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102218.n4AMILbN007356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-10 18:18:20 EDT --- Sorry, but I made some more simplifications in the spec file, and re-uploaded the .src.rpm (same URL). The file section is very small now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 22:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 18:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102231.n4AMV23T009425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #3 from david.hannequin at gmail.com 2009-05-10 18:31:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) New version with correction of comment 1. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine-0.8.3-6.fc10.src.rpm Description: Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 10 23:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 19:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905102317.n4ANH3T0007699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-10 19:17:02 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/zarafa.spec If you currently want to test this package, you need to be an approved Zarafa beta tester. Needed patches for Zarafa are included in the *.nosrc.rpm package. Note, that 6.30.0 hasn't been released and I'm updating the snapshot whenever a new beta preview gets available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 00:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 20:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110028.n4B0SPYe025059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(antti.andreimann@ | |mail.ee) | --- Comment #5 from Antti Andreimann 2009-05-10 20:28:23 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, I have been very busy for the last two weeks so I haven't had much time to spare to do the reviews. I was thinking about packaging the xsd stuff (eg. http://www.codesynthesis.com/products/xsd/), which I can do on company time, but it has a number of dependencies that are also missing from Fedora, so It might be a good idea to package something smaller first ;) However, if You are OK with it, I could start from the build tool they use (http://kolpackov.net/projects/build/). It's not very useful on it's own for Fedora, but it's a prerequisite for building other XSD related libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 02:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 22:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110223.n4B2NTB9001605@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #75 from Paul Wise 2009-05-10 22:23:23 EDT --- Lubomir etc, could you please review this alternate patch: http://patches.synfig.org/r/25/diff/#index_header Please note that some of the Fedora changes are already committed in SVN and some related changes are also in SVN. The patch does the following: Generate etl_profile.h in a less hacky way. Move the tests needed for generating etl_profile.h into configure.ac. Use less generic defines in the etl_profile.h header Prefix private defines with a double underscore. Move the etl_profile.h header to an arch-specific dir to prepare for multi-arch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110316.n4B3GvKp017652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:16:56 EDT --- perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110317.n4B3HkGT009565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:17:45 EDT --- perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110317.n4B3H1t7009482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:17:01 EDT --- perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110318.n4B3Iw7u009670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:18:57 EDT --- perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110317.n4B3Hroa017766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:17:53 EDT --- perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110319.n4B3J3M3017861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:19:02 EDT --- perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110320.n4B3KJwl018334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:20:18 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110320.n4B3KOqS010130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:20:23 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110325.n4B3PVx4019119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:25:30 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110325.n4B3PacS019154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-10 23:25:35 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:32:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110332.n4B3WiIt011941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 23:32:43 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110331.n4B3VrmQ011828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 23:31:52 EDT --- built in rawhide - waiting for perl-HTML-WikiConverter to go stable on branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110332.n4B3Wr3q011984@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 23:32:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110333.n4B3X102020181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 23:33:01 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110332.n4B3Wup2020144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 23:32:56 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 03:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 23:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110332.n4B3Wd6q020084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-10 23:32:38 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 04:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 00:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110417.n4B4HD1R018329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 04:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 00:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110417.n4B4HMYe018372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 05:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 01:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110549.n4B5nIHh007156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110603.n4B63mYk009295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-11 02:03:47 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX/OK? - Changes.txt mentions license was changed to GPLv3, but no source code files contain any mention of any license. - Please contact upstream to add license headers to source code files. - Considering that upstream author is active in Debian, he should understand the need for a clearly set license. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX - Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install to preserve time stamps in install phase. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. N/A MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSFIX - Add changes.txt to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSFIX - Ask author to add http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-3.0.txt to tarball. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490399] (Rename) Review Request: webkitgtk - GTK+ Web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110628.n4B6SRt5005492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490399 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 02:28:25 EDT --- This package is imported and built. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110632.n4B6WqIC006232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 02:32:47 EDT --- Any word here Jeff? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110636.n4B6arTc006964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 02:36:51 EDT --- Care to request cvs here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:38:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:38:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479835] Review Request: log4c - an application message logging library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110638.n4B6cMxQ007176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479835 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 02:38:20 EDT --- This appears to have been imported and built. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 06:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 02:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110640.n4B6eBdc015577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 02:40:10 EDT --- Alex: Care to request cvs here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110702.n4B72LrT019292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-11 03:02:20 EDT --- Patch approved upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi_error/source/pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in?r1=1.12&r2=1.13 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:12:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:12:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110712.n4B7CB6b020826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 03:12:11 EDT --- peppy-0.9.27-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/peppy-0.9.27-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110713.n4B7D8X9012981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 03:13:08 EDT --- peppy-0.9.27-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/peppy-0.9.27-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 07:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110757.n4B7vVt8020314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-11 03:57:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Here is my review for this one: > > ? This is possibly an inconsistency: globus-gsi-credential package has > BuildRequires: globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel >= 1 > whereas this package has > BuildRequires: globus-gsi-cert-utils-devel >= 5 > Is this intentional? > $ rpm -q globus-gsi-cert-utils > globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc10.x86_64 This is not inconsistent. This package uses features that were introduce in version 5 of globus-gsi-cert-utils, while globus-gsi-credential only uses features that have been in the library since version 1. The GPT source package description for globus-gsi-credential says: While for this package it says: The rpm build requires reflect this. > - rpmlint > globus-gssapi-gsi-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > can be ignored. > > - koji rawhide build is fine: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1346454 > > ? library/ssl_locl.h contains a copy of BSD with advertising. Does that make > this package "ASL 2.0 and BSD" ? As far as I can tell - no. The file is not installed as part of the binary package, so its license does not influence the license of the package directly. So the question is whether the license of this file influences the license of the package indirectly from being part of the compilation of the library. The file as included in the source tarball has three license statements: 1. Apache 2.0 2. BSD with advertising 3. OpenSSL So when compiling this (Apache 2.0 or BSD with advertising or OpenSSL) with all the other files which are Apache 2.0 the resulting binary is Apache 2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 08:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110833.n4B8XW8t003912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-11 04:33:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > ok > so something like that : > > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/python-kinterbasdb.spec > http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10.src.rpm Yes, exactly! Please, open another review request with proper name (python-kinterbasdb), and mark this one as duplicate of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 08:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 04:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110850.n4B8o5Qn031512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #6 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-11 04:50:04 EDT --- New spec and src: Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/imgtarget.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/imgtarget-0.1.4-2.fc11.src.rpm Here is the Koji out: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1347218 After adding BR: netpbm-devel, I got this in build.log: -------------------------------------------------- checking for pnm_readpaminit in -lpnm... no checking for pnm_readpaminit in -lnetpbm... yes -------------------------------------------------- Is that OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 09:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 05:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110913.n4B9DoJ2012586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #15 from Alex Orlandi 2009-05-11 05:13:48 EDT --- I'm sorry but I did not receive any word from upstream. I proposed to join to the libserial project to contribute to make testing and/or to help to fix license issues: the maintainer seemed to agree but, at the end of the story, I have not been included . Besides, the maintainer told me that there would have been a new release for the end of April but, as far as I can see, there's no relevant activity on the project. As we have decided to use other libraries to develop our project (i.e. gammagrape), it is not so important to me to have libserial included in Fedora. In any case, if you think that could be useful to include libserial package in Fedora, I will be glad to follow this issue. In this case, as soon as version 0.6.0 will be released (I can't say when), I will package it and I will submit for further review (hoping that upstream will have fixed license issues). Otherwise, if nobody else is interested in libserial to be included in Fedora, this package review can be closed. [OT]: There's a couple of programs I'd like to package in Fedora: as soon as I package them, if you don't mind and if you have time, I will ask you for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 09:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 05:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110917.n4B9HpY5013512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-11 05:17:50 EDT --- Assigning. Will do full review later. (In reply to comment #6) > After adding BR: netpbm-devel, I got this in build.log: > -------------------------------------------------- > checking for pnm_readpaminit in -lpnm... no > checking for pnm_readpaminit in -lnetpbm... yes > -------------------------------------------------- > > Is that OK? - This is okay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 09:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 05:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110920.n4B9Kq6G005637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: kinterbasdb |Review Request: |- A Python DB-API 2.0 |python-kinterbasdb - A |compliant interface to |Python DB-API 2.0 compliant |Firebird |interface to Firebird Alias|kinterbasdb |python-kinterbasdb --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-11 05:20:50 EDT --- Just changing Summary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 09:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 05:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905110927.n4B9RPH7006999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-11 05:27:25 EDT --- Yeah! Thanks, Mamoru, for the tip. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 10:28:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 06:28:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111028.n4BASx9g028132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-11 06:28:57 EDT --- REVIEW: +/- rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ rpmlint python-kinterbasdb-* python-kinterbasdb.ppc: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0/README python-kinterbasdb.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 15, tab: line 5) 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ The former warning must be fixed in %prep section. Just add the following line: sed -i 's|\r||g' README The latter warning may be ignored, but you should consider suppressing it as well. Not a blocker. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. - The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except leftover in install section. Please remove "%{__python} setup.py install --skip-build --root $RPM_BUILD_ROOT" string. It duplicates by the following string and doesn't explicitly contain -O1. Another one issue with this package is duplicated content - it contains doc-files as %doc and inside the %{python_sitearch}/%{origname}/ . I advice you to remove the doc-directory from %{python_sitearch}/%{origname}/ at the %install stage (quick fix), or to patch setup.py (more proper way). + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (BSD) + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc (doc/license.html). + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible (as almost all python packages - thanks to distutils!) + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum kinterbasdb-3.3.0.tar.bz2* 0296d2dbc7b76dac140b5fec2ad59f0e kinterbasdb-3.3.0.tar.bz2 0296d2dbc7b76dac140b5fec2ad59f0e kinterbasdb-3.3.0.tar.bz2.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1347344 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No extremely large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Summary: * Suppress rpmlint warning(s). * Get rid of duplicated install attemts in the %install section. * Remove docs from %{python_sitearch}/%{origname}/ or explain why it's necessary to install them here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 11:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111134.n4BBYNAw000544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-11 07:34:22 EDT --- Just tried to package mingw32-enchant, but it can't be compiled right now because the C functions _lock_file and _unlock_file aren't present in the MinGW headers/libraries yet: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/8w5bsb4f%28VS.80%29.aspx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 11:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 07:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111142.n4BBgstL002834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-11 07:42:53 EDT --- Fedora review R-BSgenome-1.10.5-1.fc10.src.rpm (2009-05-11) * OK ! Needs attention * rpmlint output R-BSgenome.noarch: W: one-line-command-in-%post /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh R-BSgenome.noarch: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /usr/lib/rpm/R-make-search-index.sh 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. The one-line-command warnings are standard for R packages * Package is named according to R packaging guidelines * Package follows R packaging guidelines * The package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (Artistic 2.0) * The license matches what is written in the DESCRIPTION file No license/copyright statements that contradict this was found * License text not included in the package (OK since the stated licence does not require it). * Specfile is written in legible English and uses macros consitently * Source matches upstream 9e9f8793065e5c49c07240c6cdcade9c BSgenome_1.10.5.tar.gz 9e9f8793065e5c49c07240c6cdcade9c SRPM/BSgenome_1.10.5.tar.gz ! However it is not the latest version (1.12.0 is available for BioC 2.4) * Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) ! BuildRequires and Requires look sane, but Is the "Requires: R-biobase" appropriate? It is not listed as a Depends or Imports on the package web site. (It will be dragged in as a dependency of the R-Biostrings package which is a direct dependency) * %check is present, but disabled with the comment - which makes sense. * The package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * %files has %defattrs, and permissions are sane. * %clean clears %buildroot * Package contains permissable content * Package doesn't own other's directories * %install clears %buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 (even valid ASCII) * Scriptlets are sane -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 12:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 08:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111216.n4BCGG4Q017808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #13 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-11 08:16:14 EDT --- done should be better now updated : http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/python-kinterbasdb.spec http://ibphoenix.fr/fedora/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 12:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 08:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111229.n4BCTSKq020428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-11 08:29:27 EDT --- Good. The package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 12:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 08:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111246.n4BCkanW024512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-11 08:46:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-kinterbasdb Short Description: A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird Owners: makowski Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 12:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 08:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111254.n4BCscBb026112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-11 08:54:37 EDT --- fedora review zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-11 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output: zita-convolver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * Package is named according to the guidelines * The specfile is named after the package * The package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) * The license tag mayches the license information in the source * The package includes the license file (COPYING) * The specfile is written in legible English * Source matches upstream and is latest version 892ef99cf39b6a8e87639efdcd96dbd5 zita-convolver-1.0.0.tar.bz2 892ef99cf39b6a8e87639efdcd96dbd5 SRPM/zita-convolver-1.0.0.tar.bz2 * Package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * Build requires are sane * Package calles ldconfig approproately * The package owns the directories it creates * No double listed files * File permissions are sane and %files has %defattrs * %clean clears buildroot * The specfile uses macros consistently * Package contains code * %doc is not essential for running * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF-8 Package approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 13:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111329.n4BDT6YO027862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Bastien Nocera 2009-05-11 09:29:05 EDT --- REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: libplist-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libplist-python.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/python/site-packages/libplist/_PList.so libplist-python.x86_64: W: no-documentation I guess the "no-documentation" ones can be ignored. You should also use the python_sitelib macro, as the module should live in /usr/lib64/python2.5/... + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file must matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. For the sub-packages, I'd rather have: Development files for %{name}, . Similar for the python sub-package. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source: $ sha1sum libplist-0.12.tar.bz2 ../SOURCES/libplist-0.12.tar.bz2 bdcaff582eaf82910df580631cd1a07f22b351ca libplist-0.12.tar.bz2 bdcaff582eaf82910df580631cd1a07f22b351ca ../SOURCES/libplist-0.12.tar.bz2 + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (see koji log above). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are in a -devel package. + No static libraries. + The library files that ends in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + The devel sub-package requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. + Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. I think the -python sub-package is missing a python requires. Rest looks good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 14:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475755] Review Request: devtodo - Manage a hierarchical, prioritised list of outstanding tasks, jobs, or just reminders. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111438.n4BEcXHo012965@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475755 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-05-11 10:38:31 EDT --- Thanks! Package imported, package built for devel. Building for F-11 shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 14:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 10:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111440.n4BEejaA013678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #5 from Sean Middleditch 2009-05-11 10:40:43 EDT --- I suppose you might be busy with the F11 release, but any further hints on what else I need to do to move this along would be appreciated. Thanks. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111505.n4BF5KZU020381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-11 11:05:18 EDT --- For 0.16-4: * License tag - Not "LPGLv2+" but "LGPLv2+". * Macros in %changelog - In changelog, use %% instead of % to suppress macro expansion like: --------------------------------------------------------------- * Sun May 10 2009 Liang Suilong 0.16-4 - Modify BuildRequires and correct the %%files. --------------------------------------------------------------- Please fix above when importing this package into Fedora CVS. --------------------------------------------------------- This package (perl-Gnome-Wnck) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111511.n4BFBUYc031336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-11 11:11:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > However, if You are OK with it, I could start from the build tool they use > (http://kolpackov.net/projects/build/). It's not very useful on it's own for > Fedora, but it's a prerequisite for building other XSD related libraries. Fedora will appreciate any tools you are interested in unless there is legal problem :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm Alias: perl-Crypt-Twofish https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-Twofish/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Crypt-Twofish.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Twofish is a 128-bit symmetric block cipher with a variable length (128, 192, or 256-bit) key, developed by Counterpane Labs. It is unpatented and free for all uses, as described at http://www.counterpane.com/twofish.html. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1347925 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:34:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:34:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499859] Review Request: python-pefile - Python module for working with Portable Executable files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111534.n4BFY0cB004170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499859 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-11 11:33:59 EDT --- I've imported the spec into CVS ("devel" and "EL-5") and built the package into each of these (dist-f12 and EPEL5). Closing this review as NEXTRELEASE - thanks everyone! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111551.n4BFpjjU008206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-11 11:51:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > The file as included in the source tarball has three license statements: > > 1. Apache 2.0 > 2. BSD with advertising > 3. OpenSSL > Yes there is also that third statement, Openssl. > So when compiling this (Apache 2.0 or BSD with advertising or OpenSSL) with all > the other files which are Apache 2.0 the resulting binary is Apache 2.0. At this point I can't be sure if we should regard this as "X or Y or Z". Why is it not "X and Y and Z"? I don't see an indication of either convention in the source. Shall we ask FE-Legal? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111551.n4BFp2JW031365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 15:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111556.n4BFuUAP009208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-11 11:56:30 EDT --- Thank you Mattias! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zita-convolver Short Description: Convolution engine library Owners: oget nando Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 16:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-Emoticon-MSN/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Text::Emoticon::MSN is a text filter that replaces text emoticons like ":-)", ";-P", etc. to the icons of MSN Messenger, detailed in http://messenger.msn.com/Resource/Emoticons.aspx Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1348003 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 16:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111616.n4BGGIXC013963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-11 12:16:16 EDT --- :( Well, it doesn't matter to me, if you would like to keep persuing including this package thats fine. If you would prefer to just drop it thats fine with me too. I'd be happy to help review any other submissions you have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 16:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111628.n4BGSaIB016744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-11 12:28:35 EDT --- I checked our openssl package at Fedora. This ssl/ssl_locl.h file contains two statements, * BSD with advertising * OpenSSL The globus folks just took that file and added a new licence to it (Apache 2.0). Are they legally allowed to do that? Let's block FE-Legal. This is something I can't (and shouldn't) decide by myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 16:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 12:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111649.n4BGnWVR020902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-11 12:49:31 EDT --- > I guess the "no-documentation" ones can be ignored. > You should also use the python_sitelib macro, as the module should live in > /usr/lib64/python2.5/... Plan on doing that but it somewhere slightly non default (looking at my system its not the only one that does it) but I have reported it upstream and will correct. > For the sub-packages, I'd rather have: > Development files for %{name}, . > > Similar for the python sub-package. No problems. Fixed. > I think the -python sub-package is missing a python requires. Rest looks good. I thought that python was automatically done. It appears not. Fixed. SPEC is same spot as before. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libplist-0.12-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489803] Review Request: libserial - C++ library to access serial ports on POSIX systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111708.n4BH8wxG017281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489803 --- Comment #17 from Alex Orlandi 2009-05-11 13:08:57 EDT --- I'm glad to keep pursuing including libserial package in Fedora (hoping it will be useful for somebody else). Unfortunately, we can't rely too much on the fact that the upstream will fix blocking issues in a short time: if this is not a problem, it's ok for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111725.n4BHPMqr030517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111733.n4BHXXkQ023459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-11 13:33:32 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=343484) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=343484) gdb log when imgtarget hangs up For 0.1.4-2 * repeating name in Summary - Fedora now considers that repeating software's name in Summary (for this srpm "ImgTarget is a") is just redundant. * License - For this package the license tag should be "GPLv2+". * Timestamps - Please use --------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Hang up - Well, on F-11, when * Using GNOME desktop environment * "Assistive support" is enabled * launch imgtarget * choose "Edit -> Preferences" Then imgtarget hangs up. gdb log is attached. Currently I have no idea how to fix this :/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111737.n4BHb4D7024585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-11 13:37:02 EDT --- Just use -p0, like: $ cd bin/ $ patch -p0 -b --suffix .warning < MY_PATCH -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 17:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495563] Review Request: febootstrap - Bootstrap a new Fedora system (like debootstrap) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111740.n4BHewQe002710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495563 --- Comment #20 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-11 13:40:57 EDT --- This has now been imported into EL-5 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 18:08:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:08:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111808.n4BI82Gx009707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Sumit Bose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #28 from Sumit Bose 2009-05-11 14:07:57 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ctdb Owners: sbose New Branches: EL-5 To test the integration with samba on RHEL it would be very helpful to have ctdb in 5E-epel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 18:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111816.n4BIGq9H001527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #25 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-11 14:16:50 EDT --- Now built in EPEL: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/2268-libguestfs-1.0.23-8.el5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 18:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111842.n4BIgd9V007410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-05-11 14:42:38 EDT --- I'm going to have to look deeper into the source of that unused dependency warning. In the meantime, thank you very much for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: expatmm Short Description: C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library Owners: jjames Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 18:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111849.n4BInr70008790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #4 from david.hannequin at gmail.com 2009-05-11 14:49:52 EDT --- Thank Manu for your review. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine-0.8.3-7.fc10.src.rpm Description: Redmine is a flexible project management web application. Written using Ruby on Rails framework, it is cross-platform and cross-database. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 18:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478683] Review Request: perl-Net-Google-AuthSub - Provides interface to interact with sites that implement Google style AuthSub In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111859.n4BIx52V011150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478683 --- Comment #5 from Andy Shevchenko 2009-05-11 14:59:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Marking as blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Sorry, I probably lost new information about sponsorship. At least 8 packages have being already maintained by me and I am member of Fedora Packager CVS Commit Group. What else should I do to get sponsorship nowadays? Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 19:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111948.n4BJmkBP030954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 --- Comment #9 from Behdad Esfahbod 2009-05-11 15:48:44 EDT --- Fabian, the package is owned by Soeren Sandmann these days, not me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 19:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111947.n4BJlaQT030754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #10 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-05-11 15:47:34 EDT --- Update fo 1.8.3.3 : Spec URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://nicoleau.fabien.free.fr/rpms/srpms.fc10/monkeystudio-1.8.3.3-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX ~]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/monkeystudio-1.8.3.3-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/monkeystudio-1.8.3.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/monkeystudio-debuginfo-1.8.3.3-1.fc10.i386.rpm monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/Qt Form/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/Qt Form/$Class Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/QObject Herited Class/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Console/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Console/$Project Name$.xpyqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Gui/$Form File Name$.ui monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Gui/template.ini monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Python/PyQt Gui/$Project Name$.xpyqt monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 14 warnings. All this warnings can be ignored as they are related to template files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 19:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 15:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905111953.n4BJrUZB022773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-11 15:53:28 EDT --- Fun fun, a new license. This one is Free, but GPL-incompatible. Use: License: Saxpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 20:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112002.n4BK2NMJ024920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(yyang at redhat.com) --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-11 16:02:21 EDT --- Thanks, spot. Yong, please provide an updated .spec/SRPM and I'll review. Keep my thoughts in comment #2 in mind, please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 20:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112003.n4BK3knD002008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #14 from Philippe Makowski 2009-05-11 16:03:45 EDT --- I rewrite it Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin.spec SRPM URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc10.src.rpm and this time build is ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1349033 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1349026 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 20:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112016.n4BKGvXw028284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #19 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-05-11 16:16:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Please feel free to me if I've let something go idle for too long. Ping again. No reply more then 4 weeks. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 20:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112023.n4BKN7qw007726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-11 16:23:06 EDT --- I first reviewed this when I had time to do reviews, but because of the delay I now have very little time to do it. You are welcome to find another reviewer, or wait until I have more time. Your choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:08:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112108.n4BL8jvT009553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #9 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-11 17:08:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > * Hang up > - Well, on F-11, when > * Using GNOME desktop environment > * "Assistive support" is enabled > * launch imgtarget > * choose "Edit -> Preferences" > Then imgtarget hangs up. gdb log is attached. > Currently I have no idea how to fix this :/ Hmm, not good.... I'll report this issue (and your logfile) to upstream, so we can wait for author's reply. Until that, I'll resolve other things in your review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] New: Pre-Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Summary: Pre-Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-wagon.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-wagon-1.0-0.2.b2.6.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Maven Wagon is a transport abstraction that is used in Maven's artifact and repository handling code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:48:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:48:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112148.n4BLmNQJ002709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Pre-Review Request:
- |manage artifacts and | |deployment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] New: Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Summary: Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/saxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/saxpath-1.0-1.3.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The SAXPath project is a Simple API for XPath. SAXPath is analogous to SAX in that the API abstracts away the details of parsing and provides a simple event based callback interface. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:53:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:53:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] New: Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 Summary: Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/aqute-bndlib.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/aqute-bndlib-0.0.203-4.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The bnd tool helps you create and diagnose OSGi R4 bundles. The key functions are: - Show the manifest and JAR contents of a bundle - Wrap a JAR so that it becomes a bundle - Create a Bundle from a specification and a class path - Verify the validity of the manifest entries The tool is capable of acting as: - Command line tool - File format - Directives - Use of macros -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-containers.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-containers-1.0-0.1.a34.5.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 21:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 17:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-classworlds.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-classworlds-1.2-0.a9.5.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Classworlds is a framework for container developers who require complex manipulation of Java's ClassLoaders. Java's native ClassLoader mechanims and classes can cause much headache and confusion for certain types of application developers. Projects which involve dynamic loading of components or otherwise represent a 'container' can benefit from the classloading control provided by classworlds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-cli-1.2-5.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-digest.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-digest-1.0-7.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] New: Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Summary: Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/dumbster.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/dumbster-1.6-6.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Dumbster is a very simple fake SMTP server designed for unit and system testing applications that send email messages. It responds to all standard SMTP commands but does not deliver messages to the user. The messages are stored within the Dumbster for later extraction and verification. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112207.n4BM7pcL006697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #11 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-11 18:07:50 EDT --- The two original licenses in the file are the original dual licensing of openssl: http://www.openssl.org/source/license.html Upstream then copied the file into their source and added their own license statement to it, which is Apache 2. I agree this addition is a bit questionable. If this file would instead have been installed as part of the openssl package then this package would be Apache-2 like all the other globus packages. Also, if the "relicensing" done by upstream is OK, then we can say this file is Apache 2, and then the package would be Apache 2 as well. However, if this is not the case the library is a unit compiled from some sources having Apache 2 license and other sources (one file) having openssl license. These two licenses are compatible with each other, but neither of them "wins" the way GPL always does. In this case the License tag should be "ASL 2.0 and OpenSSL". This might in fact be the right thing to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-mail-sender.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-mail-sender-1.0-0.a2.7.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] New: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Summary: Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/directory-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/directory-naming-0.8-3.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Old directory/naming module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] New: Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Summary: Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-configuration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-configuration-1.4-4.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Configuration is a project to provide a generic Configuration interface and allow the source of the values to vary. It provides easy typed access to single, as well as lists of configuration values based on a 'key'. Right now you can load properties from a simple properties file, a properties file in a jar, an XML file, JNDI settings, as well as use a mix different sources using a ConfigurationFactory and CompositeConfiguration. Custom configuration objects are very easy to create now by just subclassing AbstractConfiguration. This works similar to how AbstractList works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] New: Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Summary: Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-jxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-jxpath-1.2-5.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Defines a simple interpreter of an expression language called XPath. JXPath applies XPath expressions to graphs of objects of all kinds: JavaBeans, Maps, Servlet contexts, DOM etc, including mixtures thereof. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] New: Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Summary: Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/easymock.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/easymock-1.2-8.jpp6.src.rpm Description: EasyMock provides Mock Objects for interfaces in JUnit tests by generating them on the fly using Java's proxy mechanism. Due to EasyMock's unique style of recording expectations, most refactorings will not affect the Mock Objects. So EasyMock is a perfect fit for Test-Driven Development. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] New: Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 Summary: Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/javacvs.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/javacvs-5.0-5.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The module provides UI frontend to the CVS in the Netbeans IDE. Just now there is work in progress addressing project and typical workflow integration. Supported commands are: commit, update, add, remove, tag, checkout, import, history, diff, status, log, annotate. The library implements a CVS client protocol in Java. It allows to access CVS servers without setting up an external cvs program. It's base for the module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] New: Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven2-plugin-shade.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven2-plugin-shade-1.0-3.jpp6.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides the capability to package the artifact in an uber-jar, including its dependencies and to shade - i.e. rename - the packages of some of the dependencies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500265] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500265 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-naming-1.0-0.a3.4.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112231.n4BMVhTY010767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #12 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-11 18:31:42 EDT --- Reading the original openssl license more carefully: * The licence and distribution terms for any publically available version or * derivative of this code cannot be changed. i.e. this code cannot simply be * copied and put under another distribution licence * [including the GNU Public Licence.] makes the Apache license statement added by Globus a bit dubious. Or maybe it was intended as an an AND and not an OR - but then why do it? Anyway I'm getting more inclined to change the License tag to "ASL 2.0 and OpenSSL". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-registry.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-registry-1.0-0.a3.3.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500264] New: Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500264 Summary: Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-resources.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-resources-1.0-0.1.a4.4.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Plexus project seeks to create end-to-end developer tools for writing applications. At the core is the container, which can be embedded or for a full scale application server. There are many reusable components for hibernate, form processing, jndi, i18n, velocity, etc. Plexus also includes an application server which is like a J2EE application server, without all the baggage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:33:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:33:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] New: Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools-1.0-0.1.a10.2.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Doxia is a content generation framework which aims to provide its users with powerful techniques for generating static and dynamic content. Doxia can be used to generate static sites in addition to being incorporated into dynamic content generation systems like blogs, wikis and content management systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] New: Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools-1.0-0.1.a10.2.jpp6.src.rpm Description: The Maven Plugin Tools contains the necessary tools to play with Maven Plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] New: Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-enforcer-rule-api.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-enforcer-rule-api-1.0-0.1.a2.1.3.jpp6.src.rpm Description: This component provides the generic interfaces needed to implement custom rules for the maven-enforcer-plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500269] New: Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-embedder.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-embedder-2.0.4-3.jpp6.src.rpm Description: Maven Embedder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500271] New: Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Summary: Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fnasser at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Package needed for Maven 2.0.8 Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-archiver.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-archiver-2.2-0jpp.1.src.rpm Description: The Maven Archiver is mainly used by plugins to handle packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112252.n4BMq09j013961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-05-11 18:51:59 EDT --- Thanks for the review! I emailed Russel Coker russel at coker.com.au on 11 May 2009, and requested that he include a copy of the license in future releases. I added the install argument, as well as adding changes.txt (and credits.txt and INSTALL) to docdir. SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/postal-0.70-4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/postal.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 22:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 18:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112258.n4BMwWxU015218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 --- Comment #1 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-11 18:58:31 EDT --- The correct URLs are: Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-plugin-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-plugin-tools-2.1-2.jpp6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 11 23:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 19:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905112306.n4BN6S83017047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #13 from Zach Carter 2009-05-11 19:06:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > You may want to have a look at Debian bug: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=526788 > > I have not checked if this may affect Fedora packages, probably worth checking > before this enters repositories. Tomas, I noticed you are somewhat active on the fedora-security-list Would you be willing to take a look at this package from a setuid and pam perspective? I think it's ready to go, but no one wants to push it thru without a security-oriented review. thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 00:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120035.n4C0ZfOX032423@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arthurg.work at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from arthurguru 2009-05-11 20:35:40 EDT --- Hi Patrick, Here is my informal review of package netdiscover MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - netdiscover-0.3-1.20090503cvs.fc10.src.rpm OK - netdiscover-0.3-1.20090503cvs.fc7.i386.rpm OK - netdiscover-debuginfo-0.3-1.20090503cvs.fc7.i386.rpm OK - OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - DistTag doc says append to the end for the simple example used. - Release: 1.20090503cvs%{?dist} - OK Note for more experienced reviewers Potential for {?dist} being mixed with an {?alphatag} suffix, I?ve seen a format being used similar to this Release: 1%{?dist}.20090503cvs Maybe an extra snapshot example in NamingGuidelines would clear this up. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - OK, GPLv3 MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc - file "COPYING" which contains the license is not listed in %doc - Not OK, MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source - a0c8fe2025547528aa47d10ac8217282 *netdiscover-0.3-20090503cvs.tar.gz (RPM) - a0c8fe2025547528aa47d10ac8217282 *netdiscover.tar.gz (upstream) - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, i386 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK, no locales available MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. - OK, no shared libraries. MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. - OK, no relocatable package MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no library files. MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK, not a -devel package. MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la files MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, no gui available MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: License file included in source but not specified in %doc Concern over %{dist} tag location when using snapshot release Kind regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 00:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 20:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120042.n4C0gh2u015857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #19 from arthurguru 2009-05-11 20:42:41 EDT --- QA, Just did another informal review on the following package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 Lubomir, some delay (local server issues) in generating a ssh-key in order to join packager group. Kind Regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: FMIT - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120131.n4C1VEP1008767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 --- Comment #1 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-11 21:31:13 EDT --- Ops! This package already have an review request. Please, ignore this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: FMIT - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120131.n4C1VWIL008800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] New: Review Request: FMIT - Free Music Instrument Tuner Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: FMIT - Free Music Instrument Tuner https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Summary: Review Request: FMIT - Free Music Instrument Tuner Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: henriquecsj at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/fmit/fmit.spec SRPM URL: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/fmit/fmit-0.97.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: FMIT is a Free Music Instrument Tuner released under GPLv2 ==================== rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fmit-0.97.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ==================== rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/fmit-0.97.7-1.fc10.i386.rpm fmit.i386: E: devel-dependency fmit-devel ** rpmlint was complaining about some header files out of a devel package, so, I put then in one devel package. fmit.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/fmit ** I don't know what to do about this fmit.i386: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/fmit.desktop ** Also, I don't know how to solve this either. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: FMIT - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120132.n4C1Wch8023772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-11 21:32:37 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 459455 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 01:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120132.n4C1WdtH023824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |henriquecsj at gmail.com --- Comment #27 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-11 21:32:37 EDT --- *** Bug 500277 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120321.n4C3LPPf028961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:21:24 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120321.n4C3LLN6028916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:21:19 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120324.n4C3OMqt029285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:24:21 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120325.n4C3PRGF029846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:25:26 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120325.n4C3PVmY029887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:25:31 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120324.n4C3ORKG029319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:24:26 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120354.n4C3sIjm017206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:54:17 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update bibtex2html'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4683 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120353.n4C3rlhq017074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-11 23:53:46 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1348003 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 204623183bcf73ee97c298aa346104de900281de Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.00 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.06 CPU) + Package perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Text::Emoticon::MSN) = 0.04 Requires: perl(Text::Emoticon) >= 0.03 perl(base) perl(strict) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120353.n4C3r7GN001578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:53:06 EDT --- cclive-0.4.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120354.n4C3smL7001959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:54:47 EDT --- qmforge-2.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496486] Review Request: cclive - Command line video extraction utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120353.n4C3rBEF001608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496486 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.2-2.fc9 |0.4.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497339] Review Request: qmforge - Analysis tools for quantum mechanical calculations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120354.n4C3sr9Q001994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497339 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-4.fc10 |2.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120353.n4C3rH1N001644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:53:16 EDT --- php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3v3Fq002911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.68-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120353.n4C3rLM2001679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3uTVd002793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120355.n4C3tEY3002495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:55:13 EDT --- peppy-0.9.27-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update peppy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120355.n4C3tZFL002605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:55:34 EDT --- xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-notifyd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3vM0V003005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:57:21 EDT --- xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-radio-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4720 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3vHXN002967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:57:16 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack-keyboard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4718 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3uawa002832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:56:35 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update xfce4-cellmodem-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4708 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120355.n4C3trFE017976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:55:51 EDT --- globus-usage-1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3wJOU018762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:58:18 EDT --- globus-xio-2.7-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3wYIE018839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.0-2.fc10 |0.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120355.n4C3tfqu017903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:55:38 EDT --- globus-callout-0.7-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478929] Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120355.n4C3tvE7018009@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-2.fc10 |1.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3vZEi018528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:57:34 EDT --- perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3uxFo018390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:56:57 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3vd06018562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3uOBe018239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:56:23 EDT --- lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478917] Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3wNOt018797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.7-2.fc10 |2.7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3x2mQ018958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:01 EDT --- php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xRTo019060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4-1.fc11 |1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467235] Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120355.n4C3tjpF017938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-2.fc10 |0.7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3vVWS018487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:57:30 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-cellmodem-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4725 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3uIvV018171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:56:17 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update creox'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4706 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xEII019006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:13 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-yawp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4740 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120354.n4C3sdUO017378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:54:38 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gcolor2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4686 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3ueGN018288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:56:39 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update glista'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4709 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:57:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:57:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120357.n4C3vw1q018687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:57:56 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kde-plasma-stasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4727 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120356.n4C3uKjL018202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-11 23:56:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1347925 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0560b227a1a0de2755412b09b56608a9e0407d75 Crypt-Twofish-2.13.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. + Package perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: perl(Crypt::Twofish) = 2.13 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(Carp) perl(DynaLoader) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3w4Yl003487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:58:03 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496489] Review Request: abby - Front-end for cclive and clive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3wT8n003587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496489 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:58:28 EDT --- abby-0.2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xsN5003920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:53 EDT --- globus-rsl-assist-2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120400.n4C40h1E004567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:00:42 EDT --- lv2-zynadd-plugins-1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120401.n4C413vO004697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:01:01 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-1.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492971] Review Request: lv2-zynadd-plugins - LV2 port of the ZynAddSubFX engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120400.n4C40l4k004609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492971 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1-3.fc11 |1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42PR4005015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:02:24 EDT --- globus-xio-popen-driver-0.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3x6pZ003730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.0-1.fc11 |1.1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xN46003809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:23 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3wpDV003653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:58:50 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-EitherSide-1.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498912] Review Request: perl-Text-Context-EitherSide - Get n words either side of search keywords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3wuGB003690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498912 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:58:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:58:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120358.n4C3w9AV003528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xJbH003777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:18 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update creox'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4741 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120400.n4C40SgD004509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:00:28 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gcolor2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4759 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xdA3003863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:39 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack-keyboard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4744 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:00:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120400.n4C40504004262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:00:04 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bibtex2html'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120403.n4C43UvA020779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:03:30 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42lgI020587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.20.0-3.fc11 |0.21.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120403.n4C43Fls020735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:03:14 EDT --- globus-gsi-openssl-error-0.14-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453854] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120401.n4C417B6020163@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-1.fc10 |1.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42fx1020544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:02:40 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478928] Review Request: globus-rsl-assist - Globus Toolkit - RSL Manipulation Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xxb5019587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478928 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.1-1.fc10 |2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42vWF020638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:02:56 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update creox'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4787 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42KSl020467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:02:19 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update glista'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4781 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xXNv019150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:32 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-stasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4742 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 03:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 23:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120359.n4C3xiE9019479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-11 23:59:43 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-cellmodem-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4745 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120401.n4C41jMj020349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:01:44 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unoconv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4774 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45hb6006408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.002-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45tIK006479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:05:54 EDT --- lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120403.n4C43Zhf005617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-3.fc9 |1.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C459rn006190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:05:08 EDT --- globus-rsl-5.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478920] Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42UBU005064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2-2.fc10 |0.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:03:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:03:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453853] Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120403.n4C43KZ8005551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.14-1.fc9 |0.14-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120402.n4C42r7B005477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:02:52 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gcolor2'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4785 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120406.n4C46HD2006575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:06:16 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-stasks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4811 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120407.n4C47BaF006791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:07:11 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update glista'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45n2c006445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:05:48 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update bibtex2html'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4807 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45KhF006322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:05:19 EDT --- xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-radio-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120407.n4C47a9S022707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:07:35 EDT --- minicomputer-1.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45dxY021847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:05:38 EDT --- perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45PXI021753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:05:24 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45VFQ021799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.21.0-2.fc9 |0.21.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120408.n4C48h2Z022981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:08:42 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-0.68-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478927] Review Request: globus-rsl - Globus Toolkit - Resource Specification Language Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45EIW021708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.0-2.fc9 |5.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:05:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:05:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120405.n4C45xvA021977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120404.n4C44j8m021322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:04:44 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update unoconv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120407.n4C47VsP022670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:07:30 EDT --- xfce4-cddrive-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-cddrive-plugin'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120404.n4C44Wis021016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:04:31 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-alarm-clock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120411.n4C4Bhkp008781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:11:42 EDT --- perl-Class-Mix-0.002-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:07:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490588] Review Request: minicomputer - Software Synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120407.n4C47fSv007134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-3.fc10 |1.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:08:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:08:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120408.n4C48tcu007744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:08:54 EDT --- lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120411.n4C4BIvr008676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.15-2.fc11 |1.0.15-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499093] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter - Perl module to convert HTML to wiki markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120408.n4C48mYv007706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499093 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.68-1.fc10 |0.68-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120410.n4C4AkH4008530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:10:46 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120410.n4C4AoQ2008566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2-1.fc10 |2.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120412.n4C4C9cW008848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.21.0-2.fc11 |0.21.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120409.n4C490co007789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.15-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120407.n4C47uFr007307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:07:55 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update kde-plasma-yawp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4817 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120407.n4C47pKB007276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:07:50 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update unoconv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4816 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120410.n4C4Aw2f008599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:10:57 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update kde-plasma-yawp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4842 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120411.n4C4BcEF008745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:11:37 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gnome-applet-alarm-clock'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498887] Review Request: perl-Class-Mix - Dynamic class mixing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120411.n4C4BmjZ024513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498887 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.002-1.fc10 |0.002-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489233] Review Request: rmol - C++ Revenue Management Optimisation Library (RMOL) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120412.n4C4C4ZW024584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489233 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:12:03 EDT --- rmol-0.21.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120413.n4C4DcPP024995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1-1.fc10 |1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492950] Review Request: lv2-vocoder-plugins - Add a robotic effect to vocals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120413.n4C4DX8s024959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492950 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:13:32 EDT --- lv2-vocoder-plugins-1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492945] Review Request: lv2-swh-plugins - LV2 ports of LADSPA swh plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120411.n4C4BERc024364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492945 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:11:13 EDT --- lv2-swh-plugins-1.0.15-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:12:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:12:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120412.n4C4Cx6s024785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.10-1.fc11 |3.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120413.n4C4DnCP025036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:13:48 EDT --- php-pear-Text-Diff-1.1.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120410.n4C4AaBd024121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120411.n4C4BXOM024463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:11:33 EDT --- peppy-0.9.27-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update peppy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120412.n4C4CFap024632@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:12:15 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jack-keyboard'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120410.n4C4AWN4024084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Bug 453861 depends on bug 453858, which changed state. Bug 453858 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:10:31 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497690] Review Request: perl-HTML-GenToc - Generate a Table of Contents for HTML documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120412.n4C4CtPQ009440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497690 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 00:12:54 EDT --- perl-HTML-GenToc-3.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499341] Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120413.n4C4Drq6009561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.0-1.fc10 |1.1.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120417.n4C4HGkU010215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-12 00:17:15 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1344058 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9de2b10cf891fe3a2f878d6a67e41ff58a403d1b jack_capture-0.9.33.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120433.n4C4XpfQ028337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-12 00:33:50 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jack_capture Short Description: Record sound files with JACK Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120446.n4C4k8Y6014762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120446.n4C4k6b5014732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-12 00:46:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN Short Description: Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120446.n4C4k0hd030263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:45:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:45:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120445.n4C4jwgY030237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-12 00:45:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-Twofish Short Description: Twofish Encryption Algorithm Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 04:50:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-View-Email/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-View-Email.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module sends out emails from a stash key specified in the configuration settings. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1349547 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120511.n4C5BLbE002045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-12 01:11:20 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1349547 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b9c7476bd69fd4dd4426f4146ea01748b86739c7 Catalyst-View-Email-0.13.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=44, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.80 cusr 0.15 csys = 2.00 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Helper::View::Email) perl(Catalyst::Helper::View::Email::Template) perl(Catalyst::View::Email) = 0.13 perl(Catalyst::View::Email::Template) = 0.13 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Class::C3) perl(Email::MIME::Creator) perl(Email::Send) perl(Encode) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(base) perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120518.n4C5INi7003045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 01:18:21 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120518.n4C5IV7F003078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Bug 453862 depends on bug 453861, which changed state. Bug 453861 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 01:18:30 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 05:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120518.n4C5IaSO019680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 01:18:35 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 06:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 02:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905120627.n4C6RJUt030622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-12 02:27:18 EDT --- I wouldn't add INSTALL to %doc since it doesn't contain anything useful for the user of the rpm package. (You do know that you can list multiple files in a %doc line?) The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 11:14:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 07:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121114.n4CBEdZB007232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera 2009-05-12 07:14:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > I guess the "no-documentation" ones can be ignored. > > You should also use the python_sitelib macro, as the module should live in > > /usr/lib64/python2.5/... > > Plan on doing that but it somewhere slightly non default (looking at my system > its not the only one that does it) but I have reported it upstream and will > correct. You'd just need to move the directory in your install section. With that fix done, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 11:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 07:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121153.n4CBrL5x014750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-12 07:53:20 EDT --- Excellent, thanks will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 12:03:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 08:03:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121203.n4CC3jaZ016924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-12 08:03:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libplist Short Description: Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 13:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121326.n4CDQxmm019679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 --- Comment #15 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-12 09:26:58 EDT --- What is the final status of this packages?, is going to be included in fed11?, as an update in the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 13:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121326.n4CDQbY6019615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #15 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-12 09:26:36 EDT --- What is the final status of this packages?, is going to be included in fed11?, as an update in the repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 13:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121335.n4CDZf7h003769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-05-12 09:35:40 EDT --- I'll strip out INSTALL before it hits CVS. Yes I know that I can list multiple files, but as long as there isn't a plethora, one per line makes it a bit more legible to me at least. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: postal Short Description: mail server benchmark Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 13:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121340.n4CDeeZn005318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 --- Comment #7 from James Bowes 2009-05-12 09:40:39 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Jussi! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 13:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121356.n4CDuNGw026684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-05-12 09:56:21 EDT --- Sorry, I've been busy this past week. I'm waiting on you to merge the changes from Ryan that you think are appropriate and then post new versions of the spec file and srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 13:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 09:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121353.n4CDreip025892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 James Bowes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from James Bowes 2009-05-12 09:53:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gitg Short Description: GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system Owners: jbowes Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 14:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121416.n4CEGZlE031959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 10:16:34 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 14:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121416.n4CEG0Fe031835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 10:15:58 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 14:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121415.n4CEFTdE031596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 10:15:27 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 14:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121457.n4CEvLP6011502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Bug 467237 depends on bug 453861, which changed state. Bug 453861 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-12 10:57:19 EDT --- I have created a new version where the license tag is "ASL 2.0 and OpenSSL": http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-gssapi-gsi.spec I now think this makes the most sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 15:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121517.n4CFHLMa030296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #14 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-12 11:17:19 EDT --- Yes, I agree that that's the best thing to do with what we have, but the biggest doubt here is whether upstream globus is legally allowed to add a new license an top of the existing one or not. FE-Legal usually responds in a couple days. You can send an email to their mailing list if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 15:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 11:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121533.n4CFX2Rq001765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-12 11:33:01 EDT --- Michal Schmidt -- do you want to be co-owner of this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 16:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121606.n4CG65OK029251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 16:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121606.n4CG629I029202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-12 12:06:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-View-Email Short Description: Send Email from Catalyst Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 16:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121619.n4CGJN16013044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #19 from Michal Schmidt 2009-05-12 12:19:22 EDT --- Matthew, yes please. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 16:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121633.n4CGX010015875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 --- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12 12:32:59 EDT --- Yes I missing the CVS-Admin request to, so what is the state of this ticket? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 16:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 12:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121630.n4CGUeFV015456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #33 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12 12:30:36 EDT --- Can you update to 0.1.0.305 as an official release? Second, it seem, that there are to source tar ball Yarafay and Yarafay-blender. It may be nice, if you can get a look on it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] New: Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Summary: Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cnetworkmanager is a command-line client for NetworkManager, intended to supplement or replace the GUI applets. rpmlint says: cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf Which I think can both be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121722.n4CHMRjn011889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 13:22:23 EDT --- Well, this package was setup, but never imported or built. ;( It was also recently orphaned because of an inactive maintainer. ;( So, perhaps we should close this one, and you can re-open your submission? (You might look at the package here to see if there is any way to improve your submission). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121727.n4CHRDAC026896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-12 13:27:12 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag(In reply to comment #1) > Potential for {?dist} being mixed with an {?alphatag} suffix, I?ve seen a > format being used similar to this > Release: 1%{?dist}.20090503cvs Have a link? > Concern over %{dist} tag location when using snapshot release It is indeed correctly used. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121730.n4CHU6lx027550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #1 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 13:30:05 EDT --- Scratch build at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1350918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121739.n4CHd7NO029714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #29 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-12 13:39:05 EDT --- Yes, thanks! I'll try to contact jebba first and see if he is around; if no, I'll be happy to take this package and re-open my review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121725.n4CHPJne012984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #17 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-05-12 13:25:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Sorry, I've been busy this past week. > > I'm waiting on you to merge the changes from Ryan that you think are > appropriate and then post new versions of the spec file and srpm. Ok, that is the kind of stuff that I don't know hoe to procede, that is way I ask things like "that is the way in witch packages are treated..", meaning that I don't know ho is making the changes and from ho are they take it....I was under the impresion that the Ryan attached .spec files was the "updated ones", so no idea that you was waiting to me to merge the changes... So, ok here are the updated files: http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb.spec http://www.ic.uach.cl/mhenriquez/fedora10-monoRPMS/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0-1.1.fc10.src.rpm Hope that sitll can make it at least for fed11 updates...what about the gdb one? Cheers, Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:51:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:51:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121751.n4CHpV3q020834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Matthew Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-12 13:51:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: smem Short Description: Report application memory usage in a meaningful way Owners: mattdm mschmidt Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 17:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 13:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121759.n4CHxjdI003336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Nussbaumer 2009-05-12 13:59:44 EDT --- Thanks for the comments. I've added the license file to %doc and made a new SRPM. New spec file : http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover.spec New srpm : http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover-0.3-2.20090503cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 18:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121805.n4CI5h0w024583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12 14:05:42 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC files matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guildelines + Package contains no subpackages + Package contains valid license tag + License tag has GPLv2+ as an valid OSS license + Package contains verbain copy of the license text + URL tag contains URL of project home page + Could download source tar ball from upstream with spectool -g + Tar ball matches with upstream source (md5sum: 8f3eccaeff900cd68e19785f13c813ab) + Local build works fine + Koji scratch build works fine + Rpmlint is quite on source rpm + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra subpackage + Files has proper file permissions + %files stanza doesn't contains duplicate entries + All package files are owned by this package + No packaged files belong to another package + Package contains proper %Changelog Bad: - Please replace: %build make PREFIX=/usr %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=/usr sysconfdir=/etc by: %build make PREFIX=%{_prefix} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=%{_prefix} sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} - No smp enabled build - Please replace %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf - Package contains a source file with has a public domain copyright note in the header. License tag should be 'GPLv2+ and Public Domain' - Rpmlint has warning on binary rpm: rpmlint cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf - Package python-gobject2 doesn't exist in Fedora. If you want to introduced this missing package in Fedora, please set a blocker bug to this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 18:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121848.n4CImCU5013362@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 14:48:11 EDT --- Thats for the review! >Bad: >- Please replace: > > >%build >make PREFIX=/usr > >%install >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT >make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=/usr sysconfdir=/etc > >by: > >%build >make PREFIX=%{_prefix} > >%install >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT >make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT PREFIX=%{_prefix} >sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} Done. >- No smp enabled build The build step is a single sed call. I will add smp if you insist, but it really makes no sense at all. >- Please replace > >%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf >%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf > >%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf >%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf I don't think these are supposed to be config files. See gdm, NetworkManager, ConsoleKit, etc. None of them mark them as config. Users should not be editing these. It's just a bug that they are under /etc/ I guess. >- Package contains a source file with has a public domain copyright note > in the header. License tag should be 'GPLv2+ and Public Domain' Ah, good point. Fixed. > >- Rpmlint has warning on binary rpm: > >rpmlint cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-1.fc10.noarch.rpm >cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc >/etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf >cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc >/etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf Which I think can be ignored. >- Package python-gobject2 doesn't exist in Fedora. > >If you want to introduced this missing package in Fedora, please set a blocker >bug to this review. Oops. That should be pygobject2. Fixed. Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/cnetworkmanager/cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 18:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 14:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121857.n4CIvQC0015350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12 14:57:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > The build step is a single sed call. > I will add smp if you insist, but it really makes no sense at all. > > >- Please replace > > > >%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf > >%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf > > > >%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf > >%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf > > I don't think these are supposed to be config files. > See gdm, NetworkManager, ConsoleKit, etc. None of them mark them as config. > Users should not be editing these. It's just a bug that they are under /etc/ I > guess. I have done a look ok gdm and have to disagree with you. On gdm you see %config in fromt of the files which an in %{_sysconfigdir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 19:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121908.n4CJ8EFH017314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wcohen at redhat.com --- Comment #13 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-12 15:08:12 EDT --- I can easily take the Java side of things but I'd appreciate Will's help with the non-Java stuff. Will, would you mind reviewing the C++ stuff? Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 19:09:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:09:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121909.n4CJ9BkX017514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-12 15:09:10 EDT --- I'll review it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 19:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121919.n4CJJPWk008180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-12 15:19:24 EDT --- Odd. I was told by the gdm maintainer that they were not config files. ;) I only looked at ConsoleKit and gdm. I guess we can run this by the packaging folks and see what they suggest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 19:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 15:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905121939.n4CJdjYs024499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-12 15:39:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Odd. I was told by the gdm maintainer that they were not config files. ;) I have look in the devel branch of gdm and shows, that the files in %{_sysconfdir} was prefixed with %config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 20:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] New: Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Summary: Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: louis at lagendijk.xs4all.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is my first package for Fedora, so I am looking for a sponsor! Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.2.tar.gz Description: This package contains a backend for CUPS for Canon printers using the proprietary BJNP network protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 20:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122035.n4CKZnp4003261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Louis Lagendijk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 20:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122048.n4CKmUwk005929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #34 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-12 16:48:29 EDT --- It is done. Revision 315.It is working fine for me on F10 nvidia 7600. It would be nice if someone could finish the review. The .src.rpm creates two rpms: yafaray and yafaray blender. SRPMS URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-0.1.svn.20090512.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/yafaray.spec [cascavel:~/SRPMS] listrpm yafaray /usr/bin/yafaray-xml /usr/lib64/libyafaraycore.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libDarkSky.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libDebugIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libEmissionIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libEmptyVolumeIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libExpDensityVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libGridVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libNoiseVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libSingleScatterIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libSkyIntegrator.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libSkyVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libUniformVolume.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libarealight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libbasicnodes.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libbasictex.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libbidirpath.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libblendermat.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libcoatedglossy.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libdirectional.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libdirectlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libglass.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libglossymat.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libgradientback.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libpathtrace.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libphotonmap.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libpointlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libshinydiffuse.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libsimplemats.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libspherelight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libspotlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libsunlight.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libsunsky.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libtextureback.so /usr/lib64/yafaray/libvolumetrics.so /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0 /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/CODING /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/INSTALL /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/LICENSE /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct [cascavel:~/SRPMS] listrpm yafaray-blender /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafrayinterface.so /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_material.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_object.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_texture.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafqt.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafrayinterface.py /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0 /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 20:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 16:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122054.n4CKsYtj007367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-12 16:54:32 EDT --- I would point out to globus upstream that they do not have permission to change the licensing terms on that file. Also, since this is an exact copy of the openssl headers, why are we even using it? We should be using the system openssl-devel files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 21:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122105.n4CL5NBZ030272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 21:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122105.n4CL50g0029805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-12 17:04:59 EDT --- Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct is probably not wanted there. Abput /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py , Are you sure we haven't any problem with the use of such architecture independant directory, against files been in /usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/ ? (every .so and .py? should be in the same architecture dependent directory, probably - at least It, that's what I would expect) Furthermore, yafaray may require to write configuration files (relative to the given user), so this is aimed to be This file : /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh Doesn't need to be in %doc as it has nothing to do with yafaray-blender subpackage. (can be provided within the cvs anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 21:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122141.n4CLfxqk017174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 17:41:57 EDT --- taglib-extras-0.1.2-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/taglib-extras-0.1.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 21:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122142.n4CLgcO8005469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 21:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 17:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122149.n4CLnp0H018441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #1 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-05-12 17:49:50 EDT --- I am the author and upstream maintainer of this backend. It has been available on sourceforge for some time. The package is included in FreeBSD ports collection. Similar code is also included in Sane 1.20 for support of Canon network scanners. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:07:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:07:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] New: Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Summary: Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/dbus-cxx.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/dbus-cxx-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: dbus-cxx is yet another dbus C++ wrapper. What differentiates dbus-cxx from other C++ wrappers is that dbus-cxx relies heavily on sigc++ and explicitly exposes the wrapped dbus C API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:22:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:22:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226358] Merge Review: rdesktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122222.n4CMMOLi025558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226358 --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter 2009-05-12 18:22:22 EDT --- Check https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_activity.cgi?id=226358 ;-) He/she was added to cc a long time ago -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:23:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:23:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122223.n4CMNka8025770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #16 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-12 18:23:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I would point out to globus upstream that they do not have permission to change > the licensing terms on that file. Also, since this is an exact copy of the > openssl headers, why are we even using it? We should be using the system > openssl-devel files. I have filed a bugzilla report upstream about the license issue: http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6736 Globus is using the system openssl-devel header files when possible. However, this file is not installed by a normal openssl installation, and is therefore not part of the openssl-devel package. So there is no system version to use of this file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122226.n4CMQkVu026487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-12 18:26:46 EDT --- I'm not sure if that is better or worse, because it means they're using unpublished private openssl API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122227.n4CMR6VE026540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #36 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-12 18:27:05 EDT --- SRPMS URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/yafaray-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #35) > Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. Is this a question or an affirmative? > > /usr/share/doc/yafaray-0.1.0/SConstruct is probably not wanted there. > I adapted the spec for building either the snapshot or the official release. > Abput /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py , Are you sure we haven't any > problem with the use of such architecture independant directory, against files > been in /usr/lib64/python*/site-packages/ ? > (every .so and .py? should be in the same architecture dependent directory, > probably - at least It, that's what I would expect) > Furthermore, yafaray may require to write configuration files (relative to the > given user), so this is aimed to be > I did not change this yet. I have to think what to do. > > This file : /usr/share/doc/yafaray-blender-0.1.0/yafaray-snapshot.sh > Doesn't need to be in %doc as it has nothing to do with yafaray-blender > subpackage. (can be provided within the cvs anyway). Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] New: Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Summary: Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-adminutil.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-adminutil-1.1.8-2.src.rpm Description: 389-adminutil is used to administer 389 Directory Server and Admin Server, and in the 389 Gateway. Note: this is a package rename - the adminutil package is being renamed to 389-adminutil. I have put in the appropriate Provides and Obsoletes: Provides: adminutil = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: adminutil < 1.1.8-2 and Provides: adminutil-devel = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: adminutil-devel < 1.1.8-2 Source URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 See also https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1380#comment:2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122248.n4CMm4QO017684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 18:48:02 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122248.n4CMmSft017739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 18:48:27 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 22:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 18:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122249.n4CMnop3029990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-adminutil -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 23:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:32:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122332.n4CNWMXQ024821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #24 from Thomas Spura 2009-05-12 19:32:15 EDT --- Any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 12 23:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 19:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905122357.n4CNveGW028456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #37 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-12 19:57:38 EDT --- > (In reply to comment #35) > > Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. > > Is this a question or an affirmative? yes, it's a question. > > given user), so this is aimed to be > > > > I did not change this yet. I have to think what to do. Probably need to be tought along with upstream (blender, yafaray) advices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:05:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:05:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130005.n4D050GI029418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-12 20:04:59 EDT --- Any others thoughts about this package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130020.n4D0KdA4032103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:20:38 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LcBh032352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:21:38 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LhLc032386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.4-1.fc10 |1.4.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LSvo032286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:21:27 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LM3v032247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5.1-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LWkT032323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.7-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130020.n4D0KVb1032059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:20:30 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4868 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0OVXj012507@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:24:31 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0OG2t012433@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:24:16 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0NDxX012115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:23:12 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:22:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:22:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130022.n4D0MpWN012061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:22:51 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0NN0A012176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:23:22 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:22:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:22:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130022.n4D0MFIv011917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:22:14 EDT --- php-ezc-Cache-1.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LniH011739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:21:49 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0OLaO012465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4-1.fc9 |1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0OBik012407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.3-1.fc11 |1.2.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0NHCx012149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497735] Review Request: php-ezc-Cache - eZ Components Cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130022.n4D0MKhp011950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497735 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0NRQk012210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0Lrqf011772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.2-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130020.n4D0KiV3011435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.4-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130021.n4D0LHRo011663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Bug 490592 depends on bug 488542, which changed state. Bug 488542 Summary: Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:21:16 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130022.n4D0M0n9011818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:21:59 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Context'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4873 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0QTl8001471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:26:28 EDT --- php-ezc-Mail-1.6.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0R7K2001544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:27:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0OgwQ000676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:24:41 EDT --- php-ezc-EventLog-1.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0O7E9000575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:24:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0Ok10000709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-1.fc10 |1.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0RBL2001576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.2-1.fc10 |1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0N2XE000348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:23:01 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0PJ0n001248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.3-1.fc9 |1.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488549] Review Request: php-ezc-EventLog - eZ Components EventLog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130024.n4D0OaHK000642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488549 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-1.fc11 |1.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0P4dH001087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:25:02 EDT --- globus-openssl-module-0.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453855] Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0P97C001130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-1.fc10 |0.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130022.n4D0MuXo000317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.6.1-3.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0N62V000383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0Pdlc001359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.4-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0PPoc001305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:25:24 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Context'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4885 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130023.n4D0NXJ3000466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:23:32 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0RIJr001660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:27:16 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4900 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0QJRC013525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:26:18 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0ST8n014010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.4-1.fc11 |1.4.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497736] Review Request: php-ezc-Mail - eZ Components Mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0QYNW013591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.6.1-3.fc9 |1.6.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488542] Review Request: php-ezc-Database - eZ Components Database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0SPq9013982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488542 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:28:24 EDT --- php-ezc-Database-1.4.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0QNrY013555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-2.fc9 |1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0SkKY014102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.2-1.fc9 |1.3.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0QuXw013695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:26:55 EDT --- php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0RWfm013862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:27:31 EDT --- php-ezc-Archive-1.3.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0R1pb013727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0Qlhr013662@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3.2-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0Rhl8013907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:27:42 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488538] Review Request: php-ezc-Authentication - eZ Components Authentication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0PFhl013201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488538 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:25:14 EDT --- php-ezc-Authentication-1.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0SgCY014073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:28:41 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130025.n4D0PYlN013273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:25:34 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:26:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:26:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130026.n4D0QgFi013629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:26:41 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0ROHh013828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:27:22 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4901 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0Rt3d002127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:27:54 EDT --- php-ezc-Template-1.3.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0Tm2Z002648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-2.fc10 |1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490849] Review Request: php-ezc-Archive- eZ Components Archive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0RaAt001929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490849 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.3-1.fc10 |1.3.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0SAYe002211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:28:09 EDT --- php-ezc-SystemInformation-1.0.7-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0Tx87002683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.1-1.fc9 |1.5.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0TNsR002498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:29:22 EDT --- php-ezc-Configuration-1.3.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488539] Review Request: php-ezc-Configuration - eZ Components Configuration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0TSgY002530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488539 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.2-1.fc11 |1.3.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490851] Review Request: php-ezc-SystemInformation - eZ Components SystemInformation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0SEtD002238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.7-1.fc10 |1.0.7-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0Rl5A002095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.4-1.fc9 |3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490591] Review Request: php-ezc-Template - eZ Components Template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130027.n4D0RxQB002159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490591 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3.2-1.fc11 |1.3.2-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130030.n4D0U9xd003074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:30:07 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4920 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0TYa7002564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:29:33 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130028.n4D0SKHe002277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:28:19 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484567] Review Request: php-ezc-File - eZ Components File In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0ThgE014559@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484567 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:29:43 EDT --- php-ezc-File-1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 00:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 20:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490592] Review Request: php-ezc-PersistentObject - eZ Components PersistentObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130029.n4D0TsNL014595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490592 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 20:29:53 EDT --- php-ezc-PersistentObject-1.5.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 01:21:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:21:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130121.n4D1LGUb011347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Bug 467237 depends on bug 453862, which changed state. Bug 453862 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-12 21:21:14 EDT --- There are also these files library/pkcs11*.h that carry yet another license but they don't get compiled. So, for now, they won't cause us any trouble. Can you ask upstream about these files too, what are they for, are they going to get compiled in a future version etc.? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 01:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 21:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130140.n4D1e0Rt025719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-12 21:39:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-rpm-macros Short Description: RPM macros for building GHC packages Owners: ynemoy petersen Branches: F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: fedora-haskell-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 02:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130227.n4D2RkHL002679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 22:27:44 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-opensc-0.11.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 02:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130227.n4D2RsCW002759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-12 22:27:53 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-opensc-0.11.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 02:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 22:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130253.n4D2rr9f008264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 --- Comment #18 from Matthew Truch 2009-05-12 22:53:50 EDT --- I've changed the name of the binary to slimdata. I've discussed this with upstream, and although longer and more boring sounding, they agree that's correct. Symlinks also made. New files: http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata.spec http://matt.truch.net/fedora/slimdata-2.6.3-4.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1351775 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 04:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130422.n4D4MWL5010450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #19 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-13 00:22:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > Can you ask upstream about these files too, what are they for, are they going > to get compiled in a future version etc.? http://bugzilla.globus.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6737 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 04:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130458.n4D4wHBC028462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 00:58:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 04:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 00:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130459.n4D4xLa6028576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 00:59:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130501.n4D51c4X017151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:01:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130504.n4D5487w029640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:04:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130500.n4D50GeY029046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:00:15 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130503.n4D535Qw017404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:03:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:06:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:06:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130506.n4D56elB030453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:06:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130505.n4D555k5030209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:05:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130510.n4D5AWEQ019418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:10:31 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130508.n4D5879Z018806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:08:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:09:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:09:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130509.n4D59CGn018901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:09:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130511.n4D5Bi7l031327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:11:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:13:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:13:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130513.n4D5DI10031513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:13:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130515.n4D5F7xq032055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:15:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 05:20:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 01:20:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130520.n4D5KknA000615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 01:20:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130606.n4D66FiJ028407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #10 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-13 02:06:14 EDT --- Here is the new revision: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/imgtarget.spec http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc11.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1351881 Author made some workaround for avoid crashing via dialogs.patch, so please can you test them. I do not have F11 with GNOME installed. Of course, I accepted your other review comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130630.n4D6U4r7032466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-13 02:30:04 EDT --- you can request CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130630.n4D6Ud6G032656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 02:30:39 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130629.n4D6Tnw4032137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 02:29:48 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130631.n4D6VIk8032716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 02:31:18 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130629.n4D6T2E9032061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-13 02:29:01 EDT --- still links not present. unable to download SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130628.n4D6SIMZ031995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 02:28:17 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130627.n4D6RV9L031909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 02:27:31 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130634.n4D6YCj2012589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #27 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-13 02:34:10 EDT --- any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:29:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:29:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130629.n4D6TgMc011792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-13 02:29:41 EDT --- is this built? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:33:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:33:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130633.n4D6XUrb000586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-13 02:33:29 EDT --- any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130633.n4D6X8cD000517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Bug 484485 depends on bug 498703, which changed state. Bug 498703 Summary: Review Request: perl-Term-Completion - Read one line of user input, with convenience functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498703 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #21 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-13 02:33:06 EDT --- any progress here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130626.n4D6QirL011512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 02:26:43 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 06:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 02:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130657.n4D6vOsU004637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-13 02:57:23 EDT --- I'm sorry, I've prepared too many packages... Here it is http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130752.n4D7qC4p027046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #28 from manuel wolfshant 2009-05-13 03:51:58 EDT --- i am still waiting for a reply to my last question in #23 and the comment in #26. Otherwise all is good, I would approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130749.n4D7nfIY026273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #22 from manuel wolfshant 2009-05-13 03:49:39 EDT --- I am still waiting for a "go ahead" and retry building. My last attempt was exactly a week ago and there were still some missing deps which stopped mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 07:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 03:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499069] Review Request: ghc-rpm-macros - RPM macros for building GHC packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130755.n4D7tv4t016039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499069 Yaakov Nemoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #16 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-13 03:55:55 EDT --- Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 08:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130824.n4D8OndW002289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-13 04:24:48 EDT --- Have you tried my build with the added %find_lang section? Does it work for you? I though you could include it before I'll start the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 08:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130827.n4D8R9qo003133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-13 04:27:07 EDT --- I forgot to attach the spec and was pretty sure I added it later on. Seems not so :-/ Nevertheless here it is: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/dansguardian.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 08:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130834.n4D8Yh2p004830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #14 from Gratien D'haese 2009-05-13 04:34:41 EDT --- Alright, looking forward on a new version of your spec file and source. To have an idea how others do it, have a look at for example: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/amanda.spec I like the way they defined an user/group: %{!?amanda_user:%define amanda_user amandabackup} %{!?amanda_group:%define amanda_group disk} It's ok to have a suid binary if it is required. Thx -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 08:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130848.n4D8mJFS008174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #49 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-13 04:48:15 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.2.rc2.fc11.src.rpm -- * Thu May 13 2009 Michal Nowak 3.3-0.2.rc2 - 3.3-rc2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 08:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 04:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905130847.n4D8lsJ4028123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #8 from ramez hanna 2009-05-13 04:47:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > How's this looking? Ramez, do you still want to own this package? Dan? I'd > be happy to co-maintain. Please join in, i am kinda busy at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 10:15:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500074] Review Request: libplist - Library for manipulating Apple Binary and XML Property Lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131015.n4DAFRv7015213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500074 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 06:15:25 EDT --- Imported. Built for F-9 - F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131117.n4DBHiBn028154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 07:17:43 EDT --- Michel, Any update? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131120.n4DBKUxh029022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 07:20:29 EDT --- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131120.n4DBKdZj029069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 07:20:34 EDT --- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131120.n4DBKP0r009963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 07:20:23 EDT --- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131122.n4DBM9kB010298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468120] Review Request: sugar-implode - Implode for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131146.n4DBkIWT016862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468120 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 07:46:16 EDT --- Built and in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:46:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:46:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468491] Review Request: sugar-connect - Connect for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131146.n4DBk82U016760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468491 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 07:46:06 EDT --- Built and in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467645] Review Request: sugar-distance - Distance measurement for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131146.n4DBkTJo016941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467645 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 07:46:26 EDT --- Built and in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 11:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 07:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131150.n4DBo7pC004245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-05-13 07:50:06 EDT --- dbus ".conf" files aren't config files. The only thing you'll manage to do is break the setup. Don't mark those as config files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 13:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131310.n4DDAe9G023253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 --- Comment #5 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-05-13 09:10:39 EDT --- I haven't checked yet. Unfortunately upstream declare this project as dead in favour of Red Hat's work on DeviceKit and related programs. I still intend to atleast build this for Fedora 10 but it is not a high priority at the moment. I will take a look asap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 13:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498714] Review Request: gitg - GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131340.n4DDeiKE010822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498714 James Bowes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 13:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131351.n4DDpnkx013842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Charles Rose changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |462697 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 14:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131455.n4DEtgcH018008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #6 from Dan Young 2009-05-13 10:55:41 EDT --- Not sure about status on this package. Ramez, it looks like you don't want ReviewBoard, I assume the same here. I'll take this if nobody else wants it. Dave, your last spec looks good. Looks like there should be an explicit BuildRequires: python; I know there's already one on python-devel but: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#BuildRequires Also, should the BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel should just be python-setuptools? Looks like -devel just includes easy_install, which isn't necessary to build Djblets. I tested that in a mock chroot; it built OK w/: BuildRequires: python BuildRequires: python-devel BuildRequires: python-setuptools Spec: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/reviewboard/python-djblets.spec SRPM: http://files.mesd.k12.or.us/~dyoung/reviewboard/python-djblets-0.5-0.2.rc1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:05:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:05:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131505.n4DF5t91020339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131507.n4DF72YJ020553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-13 11:07:01 EDT --- built in rawhide - waiting for perl-Text-Emoticon on branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131508.n4DF8l48002593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-13 11:08:46 EDT --- built in rawhide - wait for perl-Catalyst-View-Mason on branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:10:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131510.n4DFAENQ021634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 11:10:13 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131510.n4DFAKYX003253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 11:10:19 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131524.n4DFOuqS006093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131552.n4DFqLZQ032373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 David Wragg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dpw at lshift.net --- Comment #21 from David Wragg 2009-05-13 11:52:20 EDT --- Hubert is busy with his studies at the moment, so I'm taking care of the remaining issues raised by Peter. I'm almost done addressing the blockers raised, and the EPEL build failure. But after discussion about the requirement for a -devel package with the rabbitmq development team, we are reluctant to split the package in this way. While the rabbitmq server can run without the .hrl files, they have uses that are not restricted to development activities: They are useful to allow interaction with the server at the erlang command line, for administration and monitoring. So we don't believe that they fall into the same category as the header files of a library, as described in the "Devel packages" section of the packaging guidelines. Peter, do you feel that this context be taken into account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131556.n4DFuM1R014225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-13 11:56:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) ... > TODO > - Please set blender requirement to bleder >= 2.48a-21 to > make sure, that the script are available in a corret was. You contradict yourself with this demand: Either you consider that blender isn't installed and having unversioned requires will be enought to bring the lastest blender release, either blender is already installed despite not up2date, and we chances are hight that the LuxRender-blender files will never be copied to the end-user directory anyway. As a consequence, using a versioned requires will introduce another problem: LuxRender works pretty well with blender version < 2.48a. I would like to avoid the introduction of other problem. > - Why you add an Req rom the devel-docs package to the main > Package. Thx for having noticed, I've removed it > - Please moveove content of the %doc stanza of the libs subpackage > to the main package The original > - Rpmlint complaints on binary RPMs: > pmlint LuxRender-* > LuxRender.x86_64: W: no-documentation > LuxRender-blender.x86_64: W: no-documentation > LuxRender-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py "BPY" > OK.: Blender specific > LuxRender-blender.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py 0644 > Should be fixed. Not necessarily, it depends upon the said script is meant to be sourced or executed directly.If you look at /usr/lib64/python*/, you will see that very few files are set +x (probably by misstake actually) > LuxRender-blender.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding > /usr/share/blender/scripts/LuxBlend_0.1.py > Should be fixed. Fixed, thx for having noticed. Upload in Progress... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 15:57:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 11:57:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131557.n4DFvgP5001368@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 11:57:40 EDT --- perl-Daemon-Generic-0.61-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Daemon-Generic-0.61-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131600.n4DG06xV001957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #25 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-13 12:00:05 EDT --- > - Please moveove content of the %doc stanza of the libs subpackage > to the main package The original reason was that -lib subpackage will be installed anyway. But it can be moved to the main also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131600.n4DG0UUJ015141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-13 12:00:29 EDT --- Yeah, the applied patch seems to work. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (imgtarget) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131606.n4DG62bq016398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-13 12:06:01 EDT --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/LuxRender.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/LuxRender-0.5-4.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system Changelog - Move %%doc from -lib to main - Remove Requires main from -devel-docs - Disable wrong-end-of-line-encoding for LuxBlend_0.1.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131630.n4DGUoK3021520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-13 12:30:47 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131635.n4DGZCVP022304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #27 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-13 12:35:11 EDT --- for the blender plugin directory and the plugin installation problem. I think the solution is to symlinks every files present from /usr/share/blender/scripts/*.py* to the ~/.blender/scripts directory unconditionaly when blender is run. Then, each files from /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata/config/* but not present in the ~/.blender/scripts/bpydata/config/ directory need to be copied to the end-user directory (file aren't expected to be copied from /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata/* since they are meant to be temporary files.) Unfortunately, I'm not sure what Blender.Get("datadir") is. It probably doesn't match our datadir, specially as it may be used for architecture dependent plugin (thinking about the yafaray case). But I wonder if it wouldn't have been easier to take theses: %{python_sitelib}/blender/ %if %{_lib} == "lib64" %{python_sitearch}/blender/ %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481322] Review Request: emacs-magit - Emacs interface to the most common Git operations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131643.n4DGhpjE023981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481322 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-05-13 12:43:49 EDT --- I don't know why this didn't get auto-closed when emacs-magit was pushed to stable, but it wasn't. I'll close it manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:47:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:47:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131647.n4DGlQkL011493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-05-13 12:47:25 EDT --- This review is stalled. Please respond with one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 16:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 12:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131649.n4DGnF3C011746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-05-13 12:49:13 EDT --- This review is stalled. Please respond within one week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131713.n4DHDPU6016973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 --- Comment #1 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-13 13:13:24 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/saxpath-1.0-1.4.jpp6.src.rpm Has a fix to the License as suggested by Toshio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458012] Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131737.n4DHbK2P021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Bill Nottingham 2009-05-13 13:37:14 EDT --- This appears to be built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:38:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:38:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131738.n4DHcsRM002457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 --- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham 2009-05-13 13:38:53 EDT --- This is fixed for F-11, at least. Should this be closed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131737.n4DHbYvi021990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 Bug 458025 depends on bug 458012, which changed state. Bug 458012 Summary: Review Request: openwsman - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458012 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131742.n4DHgc7H003557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 13:42:36 EDT --- expatmm-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/expatmm-1.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131744.n4DHiLgt023369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #4 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-13 13:44:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Okay, after adding libjpeg-devel builds. This is fixed upstream. Thanks for pointing it out! > However, the package uses its own versions of libmetalink and uri, which is not > allowed. You have already packaged libmetalink; there isn't a package of uri > yet. You need to make one and patch this package to use the packaged versions > of libmetalink and uri. > > > https://gna.org/projects/uri/ I found out that uri has not been maintained for 8 years, but a similar library called uriparser is actively developed. The current plan upstream is to switch to uriparser ( http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ ) which is already packaged for Fedora & other distributions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131754.n4DHsYHn006177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #28 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-13 13:54:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > for the blender plugin directory and the plugin installation problem. > I think the solution is to symlinks every files present from > /usr/share/blender/scripts/*.py* to the ~/.blender/scripts directory > unconditionaly when blender is run. This should be done by the current blender-wrapper script in the devel branch. > Then, each files from /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata/config/* but not > present in the ~/.blender/scripts/bpydata/config/ directory need to be copied > to the end-user directory > (file aren't expected to be copied from /usr/share/blender/scripts/bpydata/* > since they are meant to be temporary files.) Should be done in 2.48a-22 > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what Blender.Get("datadir") is. It probably doesn't > match our datadir, specially as it may be used for architecture dependent > plugin (thinking about the yafaray case). But I wonder if it wouldn't have been > easier to take theses: > > %{python_sitelib}/blender/ > %if %{_lib} == "lib64" > %{python_sitearch}/blender/ > %endif This should no be an issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 17:58:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:58:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131758.n4DHwcFs026426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #29 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-13 13:58:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #22) > ... > > TODO > > - Please set blender requirement to bleder >= 2.48a-21 to > > make sure, that the script are available in a corret was. > You contradict yourself with this demand: > > Either you consider that blender isn't installed and having unversioned > requires will be enought to bring the lastest blender release, either blender > is already installed despite not up2date, and we chances are hight that the > LuxRender-blender files will never be copied to the end-user directory anyway. > > As a consequence, using a versioned requires will introduce another problem: > LuxRender works pretty well with blender version < 2.48a. > I would like to avoid the introduction of other problem. > Regarding to the last comment pleas set the Req. to blender >= 2.48a-22. This release or a later release will be introduced on F-11 and F-10 after APPROVING of this review Please keep in mind, that belder-2.49 is upcomming soom. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131813.n4DIDPqY029517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-13 14:13:23 EDT --- It seems that you are now seeing that your srpm won't build on dist-f12. This issue is now being discussed on: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-May/msg01062.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131819.n4DIJ3FT030425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-13 14:19:02 EDT --- Bood: + License tag has proper value GPLv2+ and Public Domain + Build on Koji works fine * Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quite for source rpm + Local install and uninstall works fine Bad: - Application crashed when they is started without arguments: cnetworkmanager cnetworkmanager 0.8.4 - Command Line Interface for NetworkManager org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files NetworkManager is not running No Blocker: - Rpmlint complints on binary rpm: rpmlint cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10.noarch.rpm cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager.conf cnetworkmanager.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/cnetworkmanager-06.conf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. After a discussion I will accept this -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131846.n4DIkFJh004033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |dmalcolm at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-13 14:46:14 EDT --- Based on https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097#c8 I'm guessing Ramez would be happy if one or both of us took this over. Dan: the various things in comment #6 look good to me. I guess one of us needs to become the "submitter", and the other the "reviewer" to complete the process of getting this into Fedora (and then on to ReviewBoard...). I'll look into reviewing Dan's packages listed in comment #6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo8Mv005231@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500265] Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoHAB005577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500265 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoE40005480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoD32005358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoLDS005664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo49r005123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoAUh005278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoK9A005642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:00:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:00:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131900.n4DJ0Fc0020942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #12 from Jasper Capel 2009-05-13 15:00:13 EDT --- I was wondering if there are still any issues that's keeping this from being accepted as a new package. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131901.n4DJ1JaC021199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-13 15:01:18 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with Package name + Package name fullfill the naming guidelines + Package has proper License tag + License tag exclaims GPLv3 as a valid OSS license + Source files has GPLv3 copyright note in the header + Package contains verbatin text of the license + URL tag shows on proper project home page + consistently usage of rpm macros + Package contains most recent version of the application + Could download upstream source tar ball via spectool -g + Package source tar ball matches with upstream /md5sum: 028c2acd8f551ea9d68cc6b01c668b41 ) + Package contains several subpackages + Subpackages has proper RPM group + Package has proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Package has SMP build + Local build works fine + Build honors RPM_OPt_FLAGS + Rpmlint is silent on source rpm + Rpmlint complaints $ rpmlint dbus-cxx-tools-0.1.0-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm dbus-cxx-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is acceeptable + Rpmlint is silent on debuginfo file + Debuginfo rpm contains sources + Local install and uninstall works fine + Package has proper ldconfig scriptlets + Packaged files has proper files properties + %files stanza contains no duplicates files + Packaged files are own by the package + Packaged files has no conflict with ohter packages + Devel package contains no *.la or *.a files + Package has proper %Changelog stanza Bad: - %doc stanza on devel subpackage seem to be large, It will be nice to have a extra subpackage for it - Scratch build on koji fails http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1353480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131910.n4DJA4Yr009918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com --- Comment #13 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-05-13 15:10:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > * A proper exit(..) call at end of main() would eliminate the following > > compiler warning: > > gvrpcd.c:290: warning: control reaches end of non-void function > > > > > I don't know C, if this is a blocker, could you propose a patch? Alternatively, > I could ask upstream for a patch, but I think it'd be nicer if we just come up > with the patch. > Handed Jasper a patch adding a line exit(do_shutdown); to the end of main(). do_shutdown is the signal value gvrpcd uses to indicate what type of signal it got telling it to terminate so that's what I'm using here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoNro005726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoFTP005533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo5aC005165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoIse005599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoA5q005256@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoBOv005300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo7EH005207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoJ6A005621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500264] Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoGv5005554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500264 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo3en005103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo62V005186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIo4Gr005144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoCGG005321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 18:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 14:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131850.n4DIoMsI005703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |429551 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131912.n4DJCiFM010444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-13 15:12:42 EDT --- On the project homepage I could read, that the last official release is from 2007/06. This is aproximaly 2 years ago. so it may be nice, if you can ask upstream why they haven't submit an official release in the last two years. The Fedora guidelines says, that a project which should introduced in the Fedora distribution should be under active development. I you can present a new official release here, I'm willing to review the package and sponsor you, if the package is ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131930.n4DJUkP8014568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-ds-base --- Comment #1 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-13 15:30:45 EDT --- See also https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1380 Builds in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] New: Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Summary: Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-ds-base.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-ds-base-1.2.0-5.src.rpm Description: 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. The base package includes the LDAP server and command line utilities for server administration. This is just a package rename - from fedora-ds-base to 389-ds-base - I have added the appropriate provides and obsoletes: Provides: fedora-ds-base = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: fedora-ds-base < 1.2.0-5 and Provides: fedora-ds-base-devel = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: fedora-ds-base-devel < 1.2.0-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131947.n4DJlkTH031053@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #8 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-13 15:47:43 EDT --- Scratch build performed in koji: $ koji build --scratch dist-f12 python-djblets-0.5-0.2.rc1.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1353465 I worked through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines: Summary is that we may need to clarify the licensing of the package; otherwise everything looks good to me. Details follow: * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review: Clean, with rpmlint-0.85-2.fc10.noarch * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Yes, python module for import as "djblets" hence "python-djblets" * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption: Yes, they match * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines: Appears correct; the Changelog format error is minor, and preserving history seems more important * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Djblets states "Djblets is under the MIT license.", however, there is no license file within the upstream tarball. Not all of the files in the upstream tarball carry a license header, though all that do that contain a "copyright" do contain an MIT-style license grant. Does upstream need to explicitly include a license file in the tarball? In addition, the package contains an embedded copy of jquery, which is MIT/GPL dual license (installed below /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/djblets/media/js/ ) This isn't a path conflict, merely a duplication of content. My understanding is that Fedora' guidelines for JS packaging aren't yet decided on this issue. My own feeling is that it's acceptable: the upstream have done their compatibility testing against this version of the library, and have written some URL logic to handle cache-correctness using it. * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English: Yes * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible: Yes * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. MD5 sum from http://downloads.review-board.org/releases/Djblets-0.5rc1.tar.gz: 10b611756e1cbe03bfe35ab13b19638b Djblets-0.5rc1.tar.gz MD5 sum from SRPM: 10b611756e1cbe03bfe35ab13b19638b Djblets-0.5rc1.tar.gz * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: Yes, see scratch build. * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Yes * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9] No translations * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] Not applicable * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [11] Not applicable * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] Looks good * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] defattr present * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] clean present and correct. * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] Appears sane. Uses %define, but I don't think that's ruled a blocker yet. * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] Code * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [18] Not applicable. * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [18] OK * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] Not applicable. * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] Not applicable. * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [21] Not applicable. * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [19] Not applicable. * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] Not applicable. * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] Not applicable. * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [23] Not applicable. * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] See notes on javascript above. * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] It does. * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] Appears correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131949.n4DJnw89018331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 19:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 15:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905131949.n4DJneJV031408@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #12 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-13 15:49:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: imgtarget Short Description: Front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS Owners: grof Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 20:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132002.n4DK2goI002077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-13 16:02:41 EDT --- (and to complicate matters further, the setup.py has a GPLv2 license, but does state "MIT" in the metadata) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 20:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132006.n4DK6jkT022549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-13 16:06:44 EDT --- I've emailed fedora-legal-list requesting clarification; email is in moderation queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 20:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 16:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132016.n4DKGnCf005262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #11 from Dan Young 2009-05-13 16:16:48 EDT --- I reported this as a bug to upstream here: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132102.n4DL2DAE002176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-13 17:02:12 EDT --- >Bad: >- Application crashed when they is started without arguments: >cnetworkmanager >cnetworkmanager 0.8.4 - Command Line Interface for NetworkManager >org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name >org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files >NetworkManager is not running Do you have NetworkManager running? It works fine here, but I think it's expecting NetworkManager to be running. I can report that as a bug upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132120.n4DLKC6R006782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-13 17:20:11 EDT --- Thanks. I got a response from fedora-legal on the partial license grant on this question: --- The project's website does state that the overall code license is MIT [1], my concern was that only a subset of the files within the tarball carry an explicit MIT grant in their headers, the others are devoid of copyright/license text. Based on that, it sounds like this is OK for inclusion, and that I was being overly paranoid. Is this correct? Dave [1] http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Djblets states "Djblets is under the MIT license." --- ---- Response at: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-May/msg00025.html > Based on that, it sounds like this is OK for inclusion, and that I was > being overly paranoid. Is this correct? Yes, although, you should still ask upstream to fix the license attribution on the files which do not contain it. ---- I think this package is ready to approve, with these caveats: - Please add a comment above the License tag indicating the upstream license text, and the link to fedora-legal-list above. - Please change License to "MIT and (MIT or GPL)", with a further comment about the bundled version of jquery. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132127.n4DLRjod021108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #11 from Christopher Aillon 2009-05-13 17:27:44 EDT --- It has been one over one month. Peter, if you have not sent Michel direct mail yet, please do so. If you do not receive a response in a week's time, please re-assign this to me. I have strong interest in this package as I have DLNA hardware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:38:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132138.n4DLcoLB023206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-13 17:38:49 EDT --- Email sent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] New: Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Summary: Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-admin.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/389-admin-1.1.7-5.src.rpm Description: 389 Administration Server is an HTTP agent that provides management features for 389 Directory Server This is just a package rename - from fedora-ds-admin to 389-admin - I have added the appropriate provides and obsoletes: Provides: fedora-ds-admin = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: fedora-ds-admin < 1.1.7-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:41:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:41:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132141.n4DLffb0011477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-13 17:41:40 EDT --- See also https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1380 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 21:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 17:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132140.n4DLeb8V023839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-admin --- Comment #1 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-13 17:40:36 EDT --- Builds cleanly in mock -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 22:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132247.n4DMlZgh023034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 18:47:34 EDT --- ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 13 22:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 18:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905132249.n4DMnf3v002860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 18:49:40 EDT --- ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:51:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:51:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140251.n4E2phtY002132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:51:43 EDT --- perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140251.n4E2pmfB002167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2q4T7002268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:52:04 EDT --- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140251.n4E2psvk002211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:51:53 EDT --- perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2qFB8002359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:52:15 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2qKws002406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2q9B2002309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.3.0-0.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2qc38013448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:52:36 EDT --- taglib-extras-0.1.2-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sSC7014004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:54:27 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140251.n4E2pw1e013309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2qn4v013516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:52:47 EDT --- globus-gsi-sysconfig-2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2rZxO013710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453857] Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2qsxH013556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2-1.fc10 |2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2s882013919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:54:07 EDT --- perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sxKA003616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:54:59 EDT --- perl-Text-Textile-2.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2rLTC002917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:53:20 EDT --- perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:55:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:55:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498800] Review Request: perl-Text-Textile - A humane web text generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140255.n4E2t4Nu003939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498800 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.03-1.fc10 |2.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2ruq9003127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:53:55 EDT --- perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sI45003267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:54:17 EDT --- perl-Term-Prompt-1.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140256.n4E2u0jw004393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:55:59 EDT --- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2rPW1002949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140255.n4E2tFKr004068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.08-2.fc11 |0.08-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140256.n4E2undM004565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.3.0-0.fc10 |3.3.0-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140257.n4E2vJXX004693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:57:19 EDT --- perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sWX6003352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.08-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2rVol002991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:53:30 EDT --- perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered-1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498785] Review Request: perl-Term-Prompt - Perl extension for prompting a user for information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sM14003301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498785 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04-1.fc10 |1.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140256.n4E2uHoX004458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.5-1.fc9 |5.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2s0sI003159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.11-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sCgx003220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.09-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140255.n4E2taix004219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:55:35 EDT --- perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime-1.09-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491647] Review Request: taglib-extras - Taglib support for other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140252.n4E2qgwW002709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491647 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-1.fc9 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140254.n4E2sjvi003457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:54:44 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2rp45003091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:53:50 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140257.n4E2v8ek004644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:57:07 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zita-convolver'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140253.n4E2rH9n002883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:53:16 EDT --- perl-Daemon-Generic-0.61-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Daemon-Generic'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4935 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:58:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140258.n4E2w857015692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:58:07 EDT --- perl-XML-TokeParser-0.05-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498977] Review Request: perl-XML-TokeParser - Simplified interface to XML::Parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140258.n4E2wCcw015723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498977 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.05-1.fc11 |0.05-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140256.n4E2uitH015333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:56:43 EDT --- python-kinterbasdb-3.3.0-0.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498772] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache - Flexible caching support for Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140255.n4E2tAVZ014677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498772 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:55:09 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Cache-0.08-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140257.n4E2vZCw015583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:57:34 EDT --- perl-HTML-Toc-1.11-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498897] Review Request: perl-Module-Pluggable-Ordered - Call module plugins in a specified order In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140257.n4E2vO5a015534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498897 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-1.fc10 |1.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495949] Review Request: python-kinterbasdb - A Python DB-API 2.0 compliant interface to Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140256.n4E2u4Un015027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495949 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.3.0-0.fc9 |3.3.0-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453856] Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140256.n4E2uDti015093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:56:12 EDT --- globus-gsi-cert-utils-5.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:55:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:55:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498866] Review Request: perl-Data-FormValidator-Constraints-DateTime - D::FV constraints for dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140255.n4E2tfM2014887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498866 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.09-1.fc11 |1.09-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140258.n4E2wibW015858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:58:43 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update zita-convolver'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4972 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140258.n4E2wMIf005464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.03-1.fc11 |0.03-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498781] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv - Catalyst::Plugin::Setenv Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140258.n4E2wITU005429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498781 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:58:17 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Setenv-0.03-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498920] Review Request: perl-HTML-Toc - Generate, insert and update HTML Table of Contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140257.n4E2vdT3005031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498920 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.11-1.fc11 |1.11-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140258.n4E2w3wi005363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:58:02 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.33-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 02:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 22:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140257.n4E2vUaI004751@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-13 22:57:29 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update zita-convolver'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4964 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 03:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 23:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140330.n4E3UNlr021937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-13 23:30:22 EDT --- builds fine in koji rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1354051 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 05:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140513.n4E5DskT028973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-14 01:13:48 EDT --- No word here at all. I am closing this now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 05:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140520.n4E5KUlH008432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #1 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-14 01:20:28 EDT --- rpmlint is pretty verbose on this: [felix at polaris result]$ rpmlint *.rpm 389-adminutil 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 389-adminutil-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /lib64/libssl3.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /lib64/libnss3.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libssldap60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libldif60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libprldap60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libldif60.so 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicui18n.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicuuc.so.40 389-adminutil.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 /usr/lib64/libicudata.so.40 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 17 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 05:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140528.n4E5S5FO009613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #2 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-14 01:28:04 EDT --- rpmlint is also verbose on this one: [felix at polaris result]$ rpmlint *.rpm 389-ds-base 389-ds-base.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 46) 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Resource.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Inf.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DSDialogs.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/SetupDialogs.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DSMigration.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Dialog.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Migration.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DSCreate.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/SetupLog.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/FileConn.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Setup.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Util.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DialogManager.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv 389-ds-base-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/389-ds-base-1.2.0/ldap/servers/slapd/tools/ldaptool-sasl.c 389-ds-base-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Resource.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Inf.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DSDialogs.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/SetupDialogs.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DSMigration.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Dialog.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Migration.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DSCreate.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/sysconfig/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/SetupLog.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/FileConn.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Setup.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/Util.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib64/dirsrv/perl/DialogManager.pm 389-ds-base.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 30 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 05:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140534.n4E5YlFf032318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix at fetzig.org --- Comment #3 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-14 01:34:46 EDT --- Sorry to bug you again but rpmlint also doesn't like this: [felix at polaris result]$ rpmlint *.rpm 389-admin 389-admin.src: W: strange-permission 389-admin-git.sh 0775 389-admin.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod 389-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 __gxx_personality_v0 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 deleteValue 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_ReadDir 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_GetHostByName 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_SetError 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 psetGetObjectClass 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Sleep 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_InitializeNetAddr 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Open 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_GetFileInfo 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Seek 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Delete 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_FileDesc2NativeHandle 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_CloseDir 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_snprintf 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Connect 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_GetOSError 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_LockFile 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_smprintf 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Write 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PL_strcasecmp 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PL_strncpyz 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_smprintf_free 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_OpenDir 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 SSLSocket_init 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_SecondsToInterval 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_UnlockFile 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Read 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_NewTCPSocket 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PL_strdup 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_TLockFile 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_Close 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PL_strfree 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_GetError 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_vsnprintf 389-admin.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod 389-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 40 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 05:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 01:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140556.n4E5ua43003770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-05-14 01:56:35 EDT --- rpmlint on the binary still has some issues: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ampache-3.5-7.fc10.noarch.rpm ampache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /var/www/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh 0644 ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ampache apache ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ampache.cfg apache ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ampache.cfg 0640 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. The non-standard gid/uid warnings can be ignored, but the two errors should be looked at. Also I noticed that you are putting content in /var/www/apache https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Web_Applications requires that web apps use /usr/share/%{name} Also the Requires(hint) line - lame and mp3splt, as you identify above aren't in fedora, so you can't require those (not to mention the legal issues that abound) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 06:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 02:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458025] Review Request: wsmancli - Opensource Implementation of WS-Management - Command line Utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140627.n4E6RikA019883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458025 srinivas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140704.n4E74IvI016157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #14 from Jasper Capel 2009-05-14 03:04:14 EDT --- Applied the patch, and sent it upstream. New files: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.2-3.fc11.src.rpm http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140714.n4E7EZlD028813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-14 03:14:34 EDT --- libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140716.n4E7GtTR029392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-14 03:16:16 EDT --- libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140718.n4E7IhIP019234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-14 03:18:42 EDT --- libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140725.n4E7P0AS031034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140725.n4E7P1Aj031063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Bug 497948 depends on bug 497947, which changed state. Bug 497947 Summary: Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140729.n4E7TVS4031925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #3 from John Guthrie 2009-05-14 03:29:30 EDT --- I have verified the license for RenameUserJob.php and it is GPLv2+ as well. The URL that is listed in the package also lists the license as well. I have created a new SRPM and a new spec file. Here are their URLs: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/mediawiki-Renameuser-0-0.2.20090505svn.fc10.src.rpm http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f10/mediawiki-Renameuser.spec I have run rpmlint on the spec file, the SRPM, and the resulting RPM, and in all cases, rpmlint returns no errors or warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140734.n4E7Yhem000652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from John Guthrie 2009-05-14 03:34:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sendmail-PMilter Short Description: Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol Owners: guthrie Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 07:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 03:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140759.n4E7x2Mo027398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-14 03:59:01 EDT --- Sorry, have been caught in other activities as well as duties and neglected my review folder due to that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 08:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 04:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140845.n4E8jUGk017084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #19 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-05-14 04:45:29 EDT --- Chris, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 09:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 05:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140948.n4E9mWw3020210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #29 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-14 05:48:29 EDT --- I'm still around and fighting with this emacs. The problem is now we need an additional verilog-mode package for epel-5, but - the latest verilog mode package is not available on fedora yet. Fedora emacs packager maintains only from the sources than upstream ships. - I'm not sure whether the latest verilog mode package is compatible with the emacs that rhel or centos has. Else, I'll use an older version of verilog-mode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 09:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 05:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905140959.n4E9x2AU001415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #16 from Jasper Capel 2009-05-14 05:59:01 EDT --- Upstream released 1.3 including the patch (and some other code cleanup), updated files: http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm http://bender.newnewyork.nl/review/gvrpcd.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 10:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141017.n4EAH4kw026195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #30 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-05-14 06:17:02 EDT --- FWIW any verilog-mode should work with any emacs, especially in the newer-verilog-mode with older-emacs direction. (Basically whenever a new emacs is under development verilog-mode adds support for it, but doesn't loose support for older versions.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 10:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141015.n4EAFiLN005089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #8 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-14 06:15:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > rpmlint on the binary still has some issues: > [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ampache-3.5-7.fc10.noarch.rpm > ampache.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /var/www/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh 0644 > ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ampache apache > ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ampache.cfg apache > ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ampache.cfg 0640 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > > The non-standard gid/uid warnings can be ignored, but the two errors should be > looked at. The file /etc/ampache.cfg contains the mysql ampache database password in clear text. Therefore, I think it is better a more restrictive reading permission. The script /var/www/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh can have a 755 permission if you prefer this way. > > Also I noticed that you are putting content in /var/www/apache > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Web_Applications > requires that web apps use /usr/share/%{name} I changed the server root to /usr/share/ampache > > Also the Requires(hint) line - lame and mp3splt, as you identify above aren't > in fedora, so you can't require those (not to mention the legal issues that > abound) Removed non free packages. SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/ampache-3.5-8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 10:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141023.n4EANcEX006727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-14 06:23:38 EDT --- Should we set some flag for packages that passed pre-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 10:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141024.n4EAONJu027709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from manuel wolfshant 2009-05-14 06:24:22 EDT --- Package APPROVED, but Chitlesh, please try your best to push the package to EL-5. Also mind the license tag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 10:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 06:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141022.n4EAMXVo027435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-14 06:22:32 EDT --- Pre-review: OK: Licensing - All the content is Apache license and the License tag is correct. OK: SourceURL - Maven are not releasing source tarballs and instructions for creating Source0 are provided. OK: No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries - There are no prebuild parts in the src.rpm. OK: Exceptions - Not buildable now, it needs maven 2.0.8 OK: Duplication_of_system_libraries - No system libraries are duplicated. The package is good to go for the maven 2.0.8 bootstrap. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 11:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141114.n4EBEKP6016676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-14 07:14:18 EDT --- globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 11:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226031] Merge Review: libieee1284 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141115.n4EBFcM6017153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226031 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.11-6.fc12 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Tim Waugh 2009-05-14 07:15:36 EDT --- Fixes made. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 11:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 07:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141153.n4EBr4tn026253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Martin Vidner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin.brc at vidner.net --- Comment #10 from Martin Vidner 2009-05-14 07:53:02 EDT --- Hello from upstream :) I am glad to see my software packaged, thanks! Re comment 8: > Bad: > - Application crashed when they is started without arguments: > cnetworkmanager > cnetworkmanager 0.8.4 - Command Line Interface for NetworkManager > org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files > NetworkManager is not running If it had crashed you would have got a python backtrace. This is expected behavior. I admit that quoting the entire DBus error makes it less readable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 12:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141207.n4EC7HNw017708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #30 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-14 08:07:16 EDT --- >From the blender -22 commit, it should be okay now, so : Wonderfull ! Okay, I've added blender >= 2.48a-22 to the -blender sub package ! (Can I avoid a re-upload ?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 12:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490438] Review Request: rhn-client-tools - Support programs and libraries for Red Hat Network or Spacewalk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141207.n4EC7qUo029336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490438 --- Comment #7 from Nigel Jones 2009-05-14 08:07:50 EDT --- Okay, couple of things here that I've just noticed: * Icon Cache: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache - Without the icon cache no Icon appears in the menus (ouch) * .desktop file - the menu entry lands on my F10 box in System->Preferences with the name 'rhn_register' - this isn't very descriptive imo - I'd also say it's more Administration not Preferences A .desktop file that solves this would be something like: ---- [Desktop Entry] Encoding=UTF-8 Name=Update Registration GenericName=Register for software updates from Spacewalk/Satellite/Red Hat Network Comment=Register to Spacewalk/Satellite/Red Hat Network. Exec=rhn_register Icon=up2date Terminal=false Type=Application Categories=System;Settings;X-Red-Hat-Base; ---- This makes it appear as "Update Registration" to be honest you may want to call this "RHN Registration". * Broken deps - rhn-client-tools depends on yum-rhn-plugin which will apparently be a circular dependency when it gets put forward to review (this is bad) - rhn-setup depends on rhnsd which I can't seem to find -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 12:13:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:13:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465758] Review Request: perl-Net-Daemon - Perl extension for portable daemons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141213.n4ECD59r030418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465758 --- Comment #22 from Petr Lautrbach 2009-05-14 08:13:03 EDT --- perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-7.el5.noarch.rpm and perl-Net-Daemon-0.44-7.el4.noarch.rpm were pushed to epel-testing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 12:48:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 08:48:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226031] Merge Review: libieee1284 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141248.n4ECmTGs005317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226031 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-14 08:48:28 EDT --- Okay, seems good. APPROVED PS. You can still drop the dot in the python package summary: Summary: Python extension module for libieee1284. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141329.n4EDTSZU003107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 09:29:27 EDT --- I have only one item that needs a bit of feedback for pre-review: - please add a URL for the POM file; is it acceptably licensed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141333.n4EDXpsn004307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 09:33:50 EDT --- Source URLs match, md5sums check out, and the license looks fine according to the included LICENSE file. Good to go from a pre-review standpoint. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141343.n4EDhmMY017749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|needinfo? |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141343.n4EDhBuD006315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 09:43:09 EDT --- - I think the license field should be ASL 2.0 and not "Apache Software License 2.0" but see my last comment - there are 3 source files (plexus-classworlds-1.2-build.xml, plexus-classworlds-settings.xml, plexus-classworlds-1.2-jpp-depmap.xml) that do not have URLs - the md5sums of the tarball that's in the SRPM and the one that I generate are not equal but a recursive diff of the exploded contents shows not differences so I assume timestamps are the issue - I don't know what license this is. spot, can you please take a look? http://overholt.fedorapeople.org/plexus-classworlds-license.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141352.n4EDq5kP008685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-14 09:52:04 EDT --- Nevermind, looks like it is removed from the spec, but somehow made it into the SRPM... weird. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488858] Review Request: davfs2 - A filesystem driver for WebDAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141348.n4EDmt6A007767@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488858 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-14 09:48:53 EDT --- ping? Push the package as update to F-9 and F-10 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141351.n4EDp69X019726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-14 09:51:04 EDT --- This package's naming is in violation of the Fedora Packaging Guidelines. Please see: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/JPackagePolicy Basically, the "jpp" tag needs to be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141357.n4EDvsHx021255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 09:57:52 EDT --- I don't see naming guidelines on: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Pre-review_Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 13:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 09:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141356.n4EDuEkH020987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 09:56:12 EDT --- - the license field should be "ASL 2.0" [1] - there are three sources with no URLs - using the instructions for generating the source tarball, I get a lot of differences ... perhaps it's the "-34" vs. the "-44"? [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141401.n4EE1Fdg022239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-14 10:01:14 EDT --- Yeah, they're not there for this "pre-review", but it is worth pointing out that it would cause an issue at final review. If the issue was there, which it doesn't seem to be. I'm not sure how the SRPM ended up with the "jpp" tag when the spec inside it doesn't have it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141421.n4EELYqo027235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 10:21:33 EDT --- Any comment about the license, spot? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141424.n4EEOk1N027814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 10:24:45 EDT --- - there are 3 sources without URLs - I can't reproduce the source tarball as I get: svn: URL 'http://svn.codehaus.org/plexus/plexus-tools/tags/plexus-cli-1.2' doesn't exist - the license should be "ASL 2.0" - I don't see any license in the sources nor on their website; how do we know it's ASL 2.0? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141428.n4EES4dw017573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 10:28:02 EDT --- - looking at the source file headers, I think the license should be "ASL 2.0" - my generated source tarball doesn't have a matching md5sum but a recursive diff of the exploded contents shows no differences - there are 3 source files with no URLs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:32:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:32:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141432.n4EEWfBa029782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-14 10:32:40 EDT --- So, on an initial look, it looks like an Apache 1.1 derived license. I'm waiting on Red Hat Legal for some final details before I can properly answer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226031] Merge Review: libieee1284 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141457.n4EEvECC026294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226031 --- Comment #7 from Tim Waugh 2009-05-14 10:57:14 EDT --- Oops, missed that one, thanks. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141455.n4EEt2Of002707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 10:55:00 EDT --- - trying to reproduce the source tarball, I get: $ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at dumbster.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/dumbster co -P dumbster Unknown host dumbster.cvs.sourceforge.net. - the license field should be "ASL 2.0" - there's no URL for the .pom file Could we maybe use the zip they provide since it has source in it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 14:59:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 10:59:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141459.n4EExeco026918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-05-14 10:59:39 EDT --- The CVS checkout works for me. Perhaps there was a temporary DNS problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141503.n4EF3gkm004534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-14 11:03:41 EDT --- Crash is properly not the right word, but I have got an error message which I can't understand: $ cnetworkmanager cnetworkmanager 0.8.4 - Command Line Interface for NetworkManager org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files NetworkManager is not running -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141506.n4EF6Kfx028736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Miller 2009-05-14 11:06:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Crash is properly not the right word, but I have got an error message which I > can't understand: > > $ cnetworkmanager > cnetworkmanager 0.8.4 - Command Line Interface for NetworkManager > org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.ServiceUnknown: The name > org.freedesktop.NetworkManager was not provided by any .service files > NetworkManager is not running Ignore the middle two lines -- they're unnecessarily-verbose error output. Pretend it just says this: $ cnetworkmanager cnetworkmanager 0.8.4 - Command Line Interface for NetworkManager Error: NetworkManager is not running This isn't a packaging problem -- it's an improvement that could be made upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141506.n4EF6aA7005483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #31 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-14 11:06:35 EDT --- OK, As far as I can see, all is OK, so you are APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141507.n4EF7Hqm005660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 11:07:16 EDT --- Weird, it does work now. Thanks, Jerry. So I can generate a source tarball. The md5sums are different and there are some differences in the contents. It looks like all of the differences are in CVS directories. We could skirt this issue by using "cvs export" instead of "cvs co". I don't think there is an issue here, though. Remaining issuse: - fix license field - add URL for .pom file (if possible) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141510.n4EFAMOm029693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 11:10:21 EDT --- - the license field needs to be changed to "ASL 2.0" - there is no URL for Source0 and the instructions could be fixed up a bit - I see no differences between a local svn export and the contents of the tarball - there are 3 source files with no URLs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492165] Review Request: rotoscope - A free rotoscoping application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141528.n4EFS200011657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-14 11:28:00 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141525.n4EFPZLs011090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Leonid Kanter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leon at bcl.bz --- Comment #33 from Leonid Kanter 2009-05-14 11:25:31 EDT --- I rebuilt http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/blueman-1.10-1.fc10.src.rpm on F11 and tried it. /dev/rfcomm0 was successfully created but blueman was unable to add new modem to hal configuration. Traceback follows: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 586, in msg_reply_handler reply_handler(*message.get_args_list(**get_args_opts)) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/blueman/plugins/applet/DBusService.py", line 103, in reply self.Applet.Plugins.Run("on_rfcomm_connected", dev, rfcomm, uuid) File "/usr/bin/blueman-applet", line 210, in Run ret = getattr(inst, function)(*args, **kwargs) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/blueman/plugins/applet/ModemManager.py", line 122, in on_rfcomm_connected self.RegisterModem(device.get_object_path(), port) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/blueman/plugins/applet/ModemManager.py", line 58, in RegisterModem m = Mechanism() File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/blueman/main/Mechanism.py", line 29, in __init__ service = self.bus.get_object("org.blueman.Mechanism", "/") File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 244, in get_object follow_name_owner_changes=follow_name_owner_changes) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/proxies.py", line 241, in __init__ self._named_service = conn.activate_name_owner(bus_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 183, in activate_name_owner self.start_service_by_name(bus_name) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/bus.py", line 281, in start_service_by_name 'su', (bus_name, flags))) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/dbus/connection.py", line 630, in call_blocking message, timeout) dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ExecFailed: Cannot launch daemon, file not found or permissions invalid Loading configuration plugins Using gconf config backend -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:31:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:31:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141531.n4EFVRD8003743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-14 11:31:25 EDT --- By the way, would you post your new spec/srpm, Ed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:32:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:32:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141532.n4EFWNbd003913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kernel01 at gmail.co | |m) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-14 11:32:21 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141533.n4EFXHVI004329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #32 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-14 11:33:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: LuxRender Short Description: Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system Owners: kwizart Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141539.n4EFd2DM014941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #34 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-14 11:39:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > I'll update this message as soon as I repackage the RPM. Just to remind you: It's been another week. Three week for such tiny change is that some kind of joke or something? Unless you'll post an updated RPM in a reasonable time frame the review request will be closed as abandoned. (In reply to comment #33) > dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ExecFailed: > Cannot launch daemon, file not found or permissions invalid > Loading configuration plugins > Using gconf config backend Looks like you're running it as root or something like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492094] Review Request: darksnow - GTK Interface for darkice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141544.n4EFijvn016595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492094 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(yanstadel at googlem | |ail.com) --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-14 11:44:44 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488858] Review Request: davfs2 - A filesystem driver for WebDAV In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141547.n4EFlhWs007698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488858 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Will Woods 2009-05-14 11:47:42 EDT --- Updates requested for F-9 and F-10: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/davfs2-1.3.3-2.fc9 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/davfs2-1.3.3-2.fc10 Closing. Thanks for the reminder! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 15:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 11:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487587] Review Request: debuginfofs - network-mountable filesystem for debuginfo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141547.n4EFljqC007726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487587 Bug 487587 depends on bug 488858, which changed state. Bug 488858 Summary: Review Request: davfs2 - A filesystem driver for WebDAV https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 16:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 12:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141647.n4EGlGAT030485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|michel.sylvan at gmail.com |caillon at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 17:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141723.n4EHNfmX004964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-05-14 13:23:40 EDT --- No, the license field is just plain wrong. This package has some files that are under an MIT license, and some that are under an ASL 1.1 (NOT 2.0) license, sometimes both in the same directory. There is also one file, under plexus-mail-sender-api in the org.codehaus.plexus.mailsender.util package, that has a commment that merely reads "LICENSE". The legal status of that file is unclear. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 17:38:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 13:38:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141738.n4EHcLT1030769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 13:38:20 EDT --- Sorry, I don't know how I determined that it should be ASL 2.0. I must have only looked at a license file. Mea culpa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 18:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141817.n4EIHClm006879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-14 14:17:11 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with packagename + Package name follow the naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project home page + Package contains valid Provides/Obsoletes tags + Package contains proper scriptlets for ldconfig and servies Bad: - Package seems to have a needles Source1 tag - Could not able to download source tarball via spectool -g Upstream tar ball was no renamed for the new project name - Tar ball doesn't matches with upstream release 1ef45901d3c3479ad767877a7663324e fedora-ds-base-1.2.0.tar.bz2 b691b742fef04a170ad7ac27a03d5cdc ../SOURCES/389-ds-base-1.2.0.tar.bz2 Because I have the feelling, that the renaming process of the upstream project was not finisch, I will wait for a formal review until this will be happened. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 18:29:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:29:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141829.n4EITvDe009673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-05-14 14:29:55 EDT --- The license name should be "ASL 2.0". All source files contain a header identifying this license. When I use the subversion command under Source0, I get one harmless difference between my checked out tree and the tar file in the srpm, apparently due to differing time zones: $ diff -durN directory-naming-0.8 directory-naming diff -durN directory-naming-0.8/naming-core/src/test/org/apache/naming/AbstractContextTest.java directory-naming/naming-core/src/test/org/apache/naming/AbstractContextTest.java --- directory-naming-0.8/naming-core/src/test/org/apache/naming/AbstractContextTest.java 2004-12-26 21:46:47.000000000 -0700 +++ directory-naming/naming-core/src/test/org/apache/naming/AbstractContextTest.java 2004-12-26 21:46:47.000000000 -0700 @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ * * Basic tests included verify binding, context lookup, name composition, and list operations. * - * @version $Revision: 123386 $ $Date: 2004-12-27 05:46:47 +0100 (Mon, 27 Dec 2004) $ + * @version $Revision: 123386 $ $Date: 2004-12-26 21:46:47 -0700 (Sun, 26 Dec 2004) $ */ public abstract class AbstractContextTest extends TestCase { There are no precompiled files in the source tarball. There are no other libraries inside of this one. Once the license is fixed, this package passes pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 18:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 14:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141854.n4EIsxSs015878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #59 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-14 14:54:57 EDT --- Well, I have not fully read previous comments, however for -9: * BR (BuildRequires) - Would you explain why non-devel packages like: ------------------------------------------------------------------- dbus-qt qt-sqlite ------------------------------------------------------------------- have to be written as BRs explicitly? * Requires - Proper Requires(pre) or so are missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets - Would you explain why murmur subpackage does not depend on mumble main package? - The directory %{_datadir}/kde4/services/ is owned by kde-filesystem so it is better that -protocol subpackage should have "Requires: kde-filesystem". * Parallel make - Support parallel make if possible. If not possible write some comments about this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make * Installation directory ------------------------------------------------------------------ install -pD -m0755 release/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/murmurd ln -s ../sbin/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}-server ------------------------------------------------------------------ - Why is the same command has to be in two different directories in the path with different names? - By the way ------------------------------------------------------------------ %attr(-,mumble-server,mumble-server) %{_bindir}/mumble-server ------------------------------------------------------------------ Here %{_bindir}/mumble-server is a symlink and %attr(.....) on symlink is useless (see man symlink(2)) ! By the way using %{name} macro is preferred because you already use it. ------------------------------------------------------------------ #man pages mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ install -pD -m0664 man/murmurd.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ install -pD -m0664 man/mumble* %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ - These man pages must be installed under %_mandir/man1, not under %_mandir (and also see below) * Permissions ------------------------------------------------------------------ install -pD -m0664 icons/%{name}.16x16.png %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/%{name}.png ------------------------------------------------------------------ - Usually these files should have 0644 (not 0664) permission ------------------------------------------------------------------ install -pD scripts/%{name}.protocol %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/kde4/services/%{name}.protocol install -pD scripts/murmur.conf %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/murmur.conf ------------------------------------------------------------------ - Due to this these files have executable permission however it seems these should be with 0644 permision. * Inconsistent commands ------------------------------------------------------------------ install -d %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/ mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ - Why do you use both "install -d" and "mkdir -p"? * Scriptlets - Scriptlets for GTK cache updating does not match current Fedora guideline. Please fix this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache (especially check %postun) - Please specify the home directory of mumble-server user (see the -d option: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups ) Currently this is set as "/home/mumble-server" automatically (on Fedora) ------------------------------------------------------------------ %preun -n murmur if [$1 = 0]; then ------------------------------------------------------------------ - This is wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------ [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ num=0 [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ if [$num = 0] ; then echo "yes" ; fi -bash: [0: command not found ------------------------------------------------------------------ "if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then" is correct ! Note: here "[" is a built-in "command". ------------------------------------------------------------------ %post -n murmur /sbin/chkconfig --add murmur --level a|| : ------------------------------------------------------------------ - "--level a" is not needed: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets * Duplicate %files entry ------------------------------------------------------------------ -%files plugins %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/%{name} %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so ----------------------------------------------------------------- - The %files entry "%{_libdir}/%{name}" means the directory %_libdir/%name itself and all files/directories/etc under %_libdir/%name. build.log shows: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 857 Processing files: mumble-plugins-1.1.8-9.fc11.i586 858 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/mumble/liblink.so ----------------------------------------------------------------- * initscript behavior ----------------------------------------------------------------- [root at localhost ~]# service murmur start Starting murmur: [ OK ] [root at localhost ~]# service murmur stop Shutting down murmur: [ OK ] [root at localhost ~]# [ OK ] ----------------------------------------------------------------- - killproc() (in %_initrcdir/functions) internally calls success() or failure so there are duplicate messages when shutting down murmur daemon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:26:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141926.n4EJQW3C024253@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 --- Comment #2 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-05-14 15:26:31 EDT --- I added a doc subpackage. As for the scratch build, it looks like strstr() has changed between F10 and F12. The man page for F10 says it returns a char* and it looks like F12 returns a const char*. Either way I was able to change it to a const char* and it should build (it built on F11, and I'm not sure how to do a scratch build for a non-fedora package). I pushed out a new release, so here is the new spec and srpm for 0.1.1: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/dbus-cxx.spec http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/dbus-cxx-0.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500902] New: Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500902 Summary: Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kdelibs-experimental/kdelibs-experimental.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kdelibs-experimental/kdelibs-experimental-4.2.85-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355153 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141930.n4EJU0oS024636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #8 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-14 15:29:59 EDT --- License is free, but GPL incompatible. For this package, use: License: ASL 2.0 and Plexus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141935.n4EJZqWw003352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-14 15:35:51 EDT --- Just a note: (In reply to comment #2) > As for the scratch build, it looks like strstr() has changed between F10 and > F12. The man page for F10 says it returns a char* and it looks like F12 returns > a const char*. This is: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-January/msg02248.html (affects C++, not C) > and I'm not sure how to do a scratch build for a non-fedora > package). $ koji build --scratch will do. The successfully rebuilt packages are put on http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch// . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141954.n4EJsT1b008204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-14 15:54:28 EDT --- Because, you have publsh a new upstream release: Good: + Could download tar ball from upstream: + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 969929227ba787f76ac50cb199e2fb14) + Package has a extra subpackage for developers documentation + Koji build works fine. Question: Are you the upstream developer? I ask it, because I can't see any patch to solve your gcc-4.4/c++ issue. Your package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:54:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:54:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141954.n4EJsJPb031445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 15:54:17 EDT --- It would be nice to have a URL for source0. I found it upstream regardless, matched the md5sum upstream to the one I downloaded and to the one in the SRPM. I looked through a random sampling of 5 or so source files and they all say ASL 2.0 as does LICENSE.txt. Therefore, the License field should reflect this. There's a one line difference between the pom file included in the SRPM and the one from upstream (line 41): - + Otherwise, pre-review checklist seems okay to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 19:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905141959.n4EJxguB009538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 15:59:41 EDT --- - the URL is no longer valid because we're a few versions behind. Here's one that works: http://archive.apache.org/dist/commons/configuration/source/commons-configuration-1.4-src.tar.gz - I verified the md5sums all match (upstream .md5, one I downloaded, in-SRPM .tar.gz) - I looked through a random sampling of 5 or so source files and they all say ASL 2.0 as does LICENSE.txt. Therefore, the License field should reflect this. - there some whitespace and other minor-looking differences between the .pom file as included in the SRPM and what I can get from upstream Otherwise, things look okay for pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142003.n4EK3OPu001296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 16:03:23 EDT --- - I can't log in to upstream CVS with the instructions provided in the .spec. Even using the instructions at [1] I can't log in to their CVS server. - according to the upstream website, the license is MIT and this is what it says in the .spec [1] http://sourceforge.net/scm/?type=cvs&group_id=82958 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142012.n4EKC6jO012644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 --- Comment #5 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-05-14 16:12:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Question: > Are you the upstream developer? I ask it, because I can't see any > patch to solve your gcc-4.4/c++ issue. Yes. It makes patching so much easier. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:44:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:44:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142044.n4EKiOh6022089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-05-14 16:44:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dbus-cxx Short Description: C++ wrapper for dbus Owners: rvinyard Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490704] Review Request: mingw32-liboil - MinGW Windows liboil library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142049.n4EKnb6T023923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490704 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-14 16:49:35 EDT --- This is built now, so closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:58:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:58:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142058.n4EKwgd6026189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-14 16:58:40 EDT --- - I generated a source tarball using the instructions (which are missing a tar command) and although the md5sums don't match, the contents are the same - the license is fine, but please use SPL as the table at [1] states - the pom file matches what it says in the URL - none of the other XML source files appear to exist upstream anymore ... can we get them from somewhere else? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 20:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 16:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142059.n4EKx4hB016883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Bug 491616 depends on bug 438588, which changed state. Bug 438588 Summary: Review Request: zfstream - C++ iostream like access to compressed files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438588 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 491616 depends on bug 498508, which changed state. Bug 498508 Summary: mingw32-zlib does not build mingw32-minizip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498508 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|NEW |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-14 16:59:02 EDT --- Let's take this for review. Looks good at first sight :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:21:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:21:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142121.n4ELLkk6022623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-14 17:21:45 EDT --- rpmlint is silent on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142121.n4ELLTtv022581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-14 17:21:28 EDT --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355390 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] New: Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Summary: Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree-1.0.1-1.src.rpm Description: Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] New: Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Summary: Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/me-tv.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/me-tv-0.8.12-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Me TV is a GNOME desktop application for watching digital television services that use the DVB standard. Me TV works with DVB-T, DVB-C, DVB-S and ATSC cards that have kernel driver support. Me TV reads the Electronic Program Guide (EPG) data that is transmitted over the air to populate a built-in program guide which can be used for scheduling recordings. mock pass in Fedora 10, but build in Koji fail! Why? http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355399 rpmlint is clean Application works after localinstall. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142138.n4ELcvXl025963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #1 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-14 17:38:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344052) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344052) build.log from my mock This is build.log produced by mock after successfully build the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] New: Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-sqlparse.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-sqlparse-0.1.1-1.src.rpm Description: sqlparse is a tool for parsing SQL strings. It can generate pretty-printed renderings of SQL in various formats. It is a python module, together with a command-line tool. Successful scratch build in koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355440 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 21:55:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 17:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142155.n4ELtmA2005313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-14 17:55:47 EDT --- - The package fails to compile due to a missing BR: mingw32-gcc-c++. After adding this, the package compiles fine - The patch contains a comment mentioning it has been sent upstream, but what does the patch actually fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 22:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142231.n4EMVmsv003259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-14 18:31:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > - The package fails to compile due to a missing BR: mingw32-gcc-c++. After > adding this, the package compiles fine Update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-zfstream.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11.src.rpm > - The patch contains a comment mentioning it has been sent upstream, but what > does the patch actually fix? The patch fixes the inability of zfstream to read/write zip files. Without the patch, it can only read/write .gz and .bz2 and uncompressed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 22:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455622] Review Request: scriptaculous-js - JavaScript libraries for web user interfaces In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142233.n4EMXDXV011538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455622 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-14 18:33:12 EDT --- Sorry, looks like the URLs went away during "the incident". Updated spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/js/scriptaculous-js.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/js/scriptaculous-js-1.8.1-1.src.rpm Successful scratch build in Koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355452 Removing "NotReady" from the whiteboard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 22:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] New: Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 Summary: Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/emacs-verilog-mode.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/emacs-verilog-mode-502-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Verilog-mode.el is a free Verilog mode for Emacs which provides context-sensitive highlighting, auto indenting, and provides macro expansion capabilities to greatly reduce Verilog coding time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 23:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500931] Review Request: emacs-verilog-mode - Verilog mode for Emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142303.n4EN3bF3016687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500931 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |478749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 23:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142303.n4EN3ZhR016665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |500931 --- Comment #32 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-14 19:03:34 EDT --- Updated to support EPEL Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/dinotrace-9.4a-2.fc10.src.rpm I will the cvs request once emacs-verilog-mode has been approuved for EL-5. However I'll start a discussion on the mailing list to remove verilog-mode from the fedora emacs package, so that I can maintain it separately and sync its update with respect to dinotrace. Wilson is right, the latest verilog-mode is compatible with the emacs-0.21. I've verified it under Centos. Manuel, can you review the small package emacs-verilog-mode for me, I'll commit only to EL-5 until I have clearance from the mailing list to commit for F-XX branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 23:05:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:05:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142305.n4EN5ZC1009210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #27 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-14 19:05:32 EDT --- Any progress on the JSON package? Moreover: will this package provide jboss-common-jdbc-wrapper.jar? (the spec and SRPMs are not available anymore) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 23:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500902] Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142334.n4ENY7AM013819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500902 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tuxbrewr at fedoraproject.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tuxbrewr at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 23:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142339.n4ENdOMM022331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #17 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-14 19:39:22 EDT --- ping Brennan ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 14 23:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 19:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500902] Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905142344.n4ENiXS4015553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500902 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-05-14 19:44:31 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. - Checked spec file and src.rpm 0 errors, 0 warnings MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines ok MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK all archs MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. OK SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example N/A SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK ------- Looks good to me. Nice and simple Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 01:02:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 21:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500902] Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150102.n4F12YFt028970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500902 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-05-14 21:02:32 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdelibs-experimental Short Description: KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: If possible clone acl's from existing kdelibs, if that's a hassle, no biggie. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 01:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 21:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150159.n4F1xTJe006166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-14 21:59:29 EDT --- I set the fedora-review for you. It is hidden, it only appears when you click on the Flags: _edit_ link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 02:00:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:00:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150200.n4F20Xrr013807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-14 22:00:33 EDT --- Need cvs module for import. (Pre-Reviewed by Alexander Kurtakov -- Thanks Alexander!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 02:13:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:13:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150213.n4F2D9ZT016241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 --- Comment #3 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-14 22:13:08 EDT --- Hum, I really don't know if anyone ever thought of attributing a license to a POM. The: xxxx yyyy zzzzzz ##### incantation is a standard template for a maven coordinate, I don't think one can attribute an IP claim to it. As to the URL, there is none. In this specific case this is a minimal POM created for this RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 02:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150227.n4F2RnEv012283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #9 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-14 22:27:48 EDT --- The 3 files plexus-classworlds-1.2-build.xml, plexus-classworlds-settings.xml, plexus-classworlds-1.2-jpp-depmap.xml are written for this RPM so they have no upstream URL (only needed for the rpmbuild). As for the license, I guess it has to be changed for all plexus-* RPMs, so we will have to recreate/reupload all plexus-* srpms. P.S.: The dist tag expands to different things depending on where you run rpmbuild, so it will take its desired value when rebuilt in Koji. Regards! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 02:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150232.n4F2WpJK013439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 --- Comment #10 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-14 22:32:50 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-classworlds.spec http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-classworlds-1.2-0.a9.6.jpp6.src.rpm Have the new license specification. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150601.n4F61fSf018429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 --- Comment #7 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-15 02:01:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150641.n4F6fsPh025027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 --- Comment #5 from arthurguru 2009-05-15 02:41:52 EDT --- Hi Patrick, Did another informal review of netdiscover Koji build on PPC arch worked fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355750 Found an rpmlint warning: rpmlint netdiscover.spec netdiscover.spec:55: W: macro-in-%changelog doc 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Not OK ... I know the feeling. Best regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150639.n4F6dm20029980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) 2009-05-15 02:39:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: iniparser Short Description: a library for parsing ini-style files Owners: alexh Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: Apologies for dropping the ball on this one; my dev. machine was out for a while and I'd forgotten it was outstanding - thanks for reminding me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:46:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:46:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150646.n4F6ksKQ025973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 --- Comment #15 from arthurguru 2009-05-15 02:46:53 EDT --- Hi Yanko, Just did another informal review of mysqludf_xql. All went well. Best regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] New: Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 Summary: Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-PAR-Packer.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-PAR-Packer-0.991-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module implements the App::Packer::Backend interface, for generating stand-alone executables, perl scripts and PAR files. Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150651.n4F6pCGL027016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |500959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150651.n4F6pB7H026977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |500959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150651.n4F6pBtQ026999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |500959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150651.n4F6pAuo026944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498189, 500958, 497283 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 06:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 02:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] New: Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps.spec SRPM URL: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps-0.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Simply plugins for Padre gui for Perl. Build is not available because of missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150714.n4F7EfTG031874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-15 03:14:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355744 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker.src: W: summary-not-capitalized implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure == >fix this + source files match upstream url d199c6a765168282c574c744bfdf707e10bb5549 Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=1, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.27 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.33 CPU) + Package perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker-0.02-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Wx::Perl::DataWalker) = 0.02 perl(Wx::Perl::DataWalker::CurrentLevel) = 0.01 Requires: perl >= 0:5.008001 perl(Devel::Size) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(Wx) perl(Wx::Event) perl(Wx::Perl::DataWalker::CurrentLevel) perl(constant) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) fix rpmlint message APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150723.n4F7NjTK006665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-15 03:23:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355752 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2df43a4a76fc50b8d07bc3fea7b8f8465d4b444f PAR-Packer-0.991.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package perl-PAR-Packer-0.991-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: perl(App::Packer::PAR) = 0.91 perl(PAR::Filter) = 0.03 perl(PAR::Filter::Bleach) perl(PAR::Filter::Bytecode) perl(PAR::Filter::Obfuscate) perl(PAR::Filter::PatchContent) perl(PAR::Filter::PodStrip) perl(PAR::Packer) = 0.991 perl(PAR::StrippedPARL::Base) = 0.975 perl(PAR::StrippedPARL::Dynamic) = 0.958 perl(PAR::StrippedPARL::Static) = 0.958 perl(pp) = 0.977 Requires: /usr/bin/perl libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.2) libcrypt.so.1 libdl.so.2 libm.so.6 libnsl.so.1 libperl.so libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2) libresolv.so.2 libutil.so.1 perl >= 0:5.006 perl(App::Packer::PAR) perl(Archive::Zip) perl(Config) perl(Cwd) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Spec) perl(File::Temp) perl(FindBin) perl(Getopt::ArgvFile) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Module::ScanDeps) perl(PAR) perl(PAR::Filter) perl(PAR::Packer) perl(Tk) perl(Tk::Balloon) perl(Tk::Dialog) perl(Tk::LabEntry) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(pp) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Seems you forgot to remove BuildRequires: perl >= 1:5.6.0 Remove this. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150729.n4F7Tx0l002548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-15 03:29:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker Short Description: Implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150731.n4F7V01R008252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-15 03:30:59 EDT --- Wow, you are fast. Thank you. Useless BR was removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150731.n4F7Vh1r008442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-15 03:31:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PAR-Packer Short Description: PAR Packager Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150737.n4F7b70Z009263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-15 03:37:05 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355746 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0afce4a365d5a13a40f13031a1f6dc9bfa6a9788 Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=528, 47 wallclock secs ( 0.13 usr 0.00 sys + 47.13 cusr 0.05 csys = 47.31 CPU) + Package perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate-0.04-4.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate) = 0.04 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ABC) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::AHDL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ANSI_C89) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ASP) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::AVR_Assembler) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::AWK) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ada) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::All) = 0.02 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ansys) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Apache_Configuration) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Asm6502) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Bash) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::BibTeX) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::C) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CGiS) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CMake) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CSS) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CSS_PHP) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CUE_Sheet) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cdash) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cg) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ChangeLog) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cisco) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Clipper) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ColdFusion) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Common_Lisp) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ComponentminusPascal) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cplusplus) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::D) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::De_DE) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Debian_Changelog) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Debian_Control) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Desktop) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Diff) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Doxygen) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::E_Language) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Eiffel) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Email) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::En_US) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Euphoria) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ferite) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Fortran) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::FourGL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::FourGLminusPER) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::FreeBASIC) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GDL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GLSL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GNU_Assembler) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GNU_Gettext) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::HTML) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Haskell) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::IDL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ILERPG) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::INI_Files) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Inform) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Intel_x86_NASM) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::JSP) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Java) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::JavaScript) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::JavaScript_PHP) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Javadoc) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::KBasic) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Kate_File_Template) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LDIF) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LPC) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LaTeX) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Lex_Flex) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LilyPond) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Literate_Haskell) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Logtalk) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Lua) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::M3U) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::MABminusDB) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::MIPS_Assembler) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Makefile) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Mason) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Matlab) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Modulaminus2) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Music_Publisher) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Nl) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Objective_Caml) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ObjectiveminusC) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Octave) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PHP_HTML) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PHP_PHP) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::POVminusRay) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Pascal) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Perl) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PicAsm) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Pike) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PostScript) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Progress) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Prolog) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PureBasic) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Python) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Quake_Script) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::REXX) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::RPM_Spec) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::RSI_IDL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::R_Script) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::RenderMan_RIB) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ruby) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SGML) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SML) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SQL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SQL_MySQL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SQL_PostgreSQL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Sather) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Scheme) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Scilab) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Sieve) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Spice) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Stata) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::TI_Basic) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::TaskJuggler) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Tcl_Tk) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Template) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ToolKit) = 0.01 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Txt2tags) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::UnrealScript) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::VHDL) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::VRML) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Velocity) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Verilog) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::WINE_Config) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Wikimedia) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XHarbour) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XML) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XMLData) = 0.01 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XML_Debug) = 0.02 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Xorg_Configuration) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Xslt) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Yacas) = 0.03 perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Yacc_Bison) = 0.03 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(File::Basename) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::AHDL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ANSI_C89) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ASP) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::AVR_Assembler) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::AWK) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ada) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Alerts) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Asm6502) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Bash) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::BibTeX) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::C) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CGiS) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CMake) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CSS) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::CUE_Sheet) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cdash) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cg) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ChangeLog) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cisco) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Clipper) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ColdFusion) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Common_Lisp) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ComponentminusPascal) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Cplusplus) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::D) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Debian_Changelog) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Debian_Control) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Desktop) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Diff) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Doxygen) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::E_Language) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Eiffel) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Euphoria) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ferite) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Fortran) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::FourGL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::FourGLminusPER) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GDL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GLSL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GNU_Assembler) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::GNU_Gettext) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::HTML) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Haskell) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::IDL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::ILERPG) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::INI_Files) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Inform) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Intel_x86_NASM) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::JSP) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Java) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::JavaScript) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Javadoc) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::KBasic) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LDIF) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LPC) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LaTeX) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Lex_Flex) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::LilyPond) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Literate_Haskell) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Lua) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::MABminusDB) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::MIPS_Assembler) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Makefile) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Mason) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Matlab) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Modulaminus2) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Music_Publisher) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Octave) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PHP_HTML) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PHP_PHP) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::POVminusRay) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Pascal) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Perl) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PicAsm) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Pike) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PostScript) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Progress) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Prolog) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::PureBasic) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Python) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Quake_Script) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::REXX) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::RPM_Spec) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::RSI_IDL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::R_Script) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::RenderMan_RIB) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Ruby) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SGML) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SML) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SQL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SQL_MySQL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::SQL_PostgreSQL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Sather) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Scheme) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Scilab) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Sieve) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Spice) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Stata) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::TI_Basic) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Tcl_Tk) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Txt2tags) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::UnrealScript) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::VHDL) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::VRML) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Velocity) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Verilog) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::WINE_Config) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XHarbour) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XML) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XMLData) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::XML_Debug) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Xslt) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Yacas) perl(Syntax::Highlight::Engine::Kate::Yacc_Bison) perl(XML::Dumper) perl(XML::TokeParser) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application suggestions: 1)Remove BuildRequires: perl(XML::TokeParser) Its needed only at runtime and yum is resolving it APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 447368] Review Request: schroot - Execute commands in a chroot environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150742.n4F7g3fw010276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=447368 --- Comment #14 from Tomas Hoger 2009-05-15 03:41:59 EDT --- Given my actions backlog, I can't really promise you to have any serious look at the moment, sorry. ;( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150740.n4F7ekTQ009956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 --- Comment #13 from Panu Matilainen 2009-05-15 03:40:42 EDT --- Okay, I fixed the rpmlint nitpickery over tab-vs-space etc + obsoletes + the io tests (the difference comes from SQLITE_DISABLE_DIRSYNC build-switch so its ok) in devel. With that, as of sqlite 3.6.14, the test-suite is error-free on ix86 + x86_64, the other testsuite-patches here dont seem to be relevant (at least anymore). Except, hmm, what's with the "use .so instead of .la" patch? PPC (both 32 and 64bit) is not quite there however, this nan-breakage: http://www.sqlite.org/cvstrac/tktview?tn=3404 and then a pile of rtree-tests fails (possibly due to the nan-issue, haven't looked that closely). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:50:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:50:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150750.n4F7o6wZ006803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-15 03:50:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate Short Description: Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 07:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 03:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150753.n4F7rJTm012551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(robin.norwood at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #14 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-15 03:53:17 EDT --- Thanks, Panu! -- Robin: Can you continue with the review, please? The packages are here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=485 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 08:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 04:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150803.n4F83scH009659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 --- Comment #33 from manuel wolfshant 2009-05-15 04:03:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > Manuel, can you review the small package emacs-verilog-mode for me, I'll commit > only to EL-5 until I have clearance from the mailing list to commit for F-XX > branches. Sure, it will be my pleasure to do it, but not sooner than next week. I am really really very busy at work these weeks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 08:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 04:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150835.n4F8ZlUv021656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 04:35:44 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libguestfs REMOVE Branch: F-10 Sorry about this - I spent some time trying to backport the necessary enhancement to qemu into the version of qemu in F-10, but it's a lot more complicated than I expected. So I'd like to remove the F-10 branch from this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 08:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 04:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150837.n4F8bIe2021900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-15 04:37:16 EDT --- Haven't found further issues. Instead of depending on "chkconfig" and "initscripts", you can prefer a dependency on /sbin/chkconfig and /sbin/service instead, since you execute those tools with absolute path. The dependency on those file locations is not more expensive than requiring the package names. The file Provides for files in many (or all) *bin* paths as well as files in /etc are covered by the primary metadata file. More packages do it already, too. $ repoquery --whatrequires /sbin/chkconfig|wc -l 364 $ repoquery --whatrequires chkconfig|wc -l 202 APPROVED : gvrpcd-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 08:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 04:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150854.n4F8s41P019717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 04:54:03 EDT --- w3m -dump http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/uml/index.html > index.html is not OK since the build nodes don't have an internet connection. List the file as Source1 instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487978] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150921.n4F9LRwu025839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 Karel Voln? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kvolny at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Karel Voln? 2009-05-15 05:21:25 EDT --- just a few notes ... I just tried the .spec on RHEL-5: * I had to change BuildRequires qt3-devel to qt-devel * I had to include /usr/lib64/qt-3.3/bin in path to be able to use qmake * I had to set QTDIR="/usr/lib64/qt-3.3" otherwise the build went fine, and I can use sqlitebrowser without any problems (on x86_64, for the record) note that in project svn, there were some efforts to port this to Qt4, so personally, I'd throw this version away and try to encourage the author to release the new version including the possibility of dynamic linking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150931.n4F9VerK028019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #18 from Jasper Capel 2009-05-15 05:31:39 EDT --- Thanks. :) I'll change the requires too, it's nicer to depend on the binaries I actually need than on package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150932.n4F9Wd6Q028258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Jasper Capel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Jasper Capel 2009-05-15 05:32:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gvrpcd Short Description: A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. Owners: jasper Branches: EL-5, F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150943.n4F9hDqs030412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 05:43:11 EDT --- Yes, very good point. I'll post an updated package in a moment containing that & a few other fixes ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 09:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 05:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905150951.n4F9pAsB005609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 05:51:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree-1.0.1-2.src.rpm * Fri May 15 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.0.1-2 - Include the index file as a source file. - Improve the description, remove spelling mistakes and other typos. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151007.n4FA7V2D008967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151014.n4FAEkMm004692@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-15 06:14:44 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344112) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344112) Patch to compile Compiles with the attached. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355776 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355793 i.e. ---------------------------------------- #include #include ---------------------------------------- fails but ---------------------------------------- #include #include ---------------------------------------- succeeds. ref (from google): http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.0/01335.html Some notes (note that I have not tested this software) - suggest to add INSTALL="install -p" to 'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files - This package should own the directory %{_datadir}/%{name}/ - Would you check if the following build.log what you expect? ---------------------------------------- Optional engines support: xine engine ................: yes libvlc engine ..............: no MPlayer engine .............: no xine-lib engine ............: no GStreamer library engine ...: no ---------------------------------------- It seems that "xine-lib engine" "GStreamer library engine" can be enabled with some BRs in Fedora and some configure option, however configure.ac says they are experimental so I am not sure if you intentionally disabled this or not. ?? From src/xine_engine.cc, this software seems to launch "xine" program : ---------------------------------------- 49 void XineEngine::play(const Glib::ustring& mrl) 50 { 56 StringList argv; 57 argv.push_back("xine"); 115 try 116 { 117 Glib::spawn_async_with_pipes("/tmp", 118 argv, ---------------------------------------- However xine binary is in xine package, which is in rpmfusion-free. Does this software work even if "xine" rpm is removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151027.n4FARRLO007548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz --- Comment #3 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-15 06:27:26 EDT --- Please see http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:37:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:37:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151037.n4FAbs1R015156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 06:37:02 EDT --- Mock build is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151036.n4FAafpb015023@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 06:36:39 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License in source code is GPL+ not GPLv2. License field must be GPL+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. ~OK - It's also possible to use the original srpm as the source: Source0: ftp://ftp.owlriver.com/pub/mirror/ORC/zerofree/zerofree-1.0.1-1orc.src.rpm BuildRequires: cpio # Create build directory without unpacking sources %setup -T -c -n %{name}-%{version} # Unpack original srpm rpm2cpio %{SOURCE0} | cpio -i # Unpack tar file tar zxf zerofree-%{version}.tgz Then you need to change directory to %{name}-%{version} before compiling MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Use make CC="gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS" instead of make RPM_OPT_FLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to honor optflags and cp -p %{SOURCE1} . to preserve time stamp of the web page. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. N/A MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. N/A MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. NEEDSWORK - Fix the optflag problem. MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. NEEDSWORK - The tag is %{?dist} not %{?_dist} SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 10:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 06:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151047.n4FAlWFt011626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 06:47:31 EDT --- Whoops, forgot to post here the new spec & srpm: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/rpmdepsize.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151103.n4FB32UJ020695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:03:01 EDT --- I think this should fix everything mentioned in the review: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree-1.0.1-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 15 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.0.1-3 - Use the upstream SRPM directly, unpacking source from it. - License is GPLv2+. - Fix use of dist macro. - Pass the RPM OPTFLAGS to C compiler (should also fix debuginfo pkg). - Use 'cp -p' to preserve timestamps when copying index.html file. - Fix the defattr line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151109.n4FB9EO3021769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 07:09:13 EDT --- Some cleanups. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/firehol-1.273-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151111.n4FBBuGj016686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |rjones at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rjones at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:11:54 EDT --- Taking for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151120.n4FBKS53024133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 07:20:26 EDT --- Okay, fixed everything. rpmlint output is clean. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pypar.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pypar-2.1.0_66-2.fc10.src.rpm (I didn't add eog as a requirement since it's only a requirement for the one example.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:22:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:22:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465636] Review Request: FireHOL - a Linux iptables packet filtering firewall builder for humans In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151122.n4FBMYVV024520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465636 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 07:22:33 EDT --- rpmlint output: firehol.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/firehol/firehol.conf 0640 firehol.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/firehol 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. These can both be ignored, since 1. the firewall config is not supposed to be read by other than root and 2. there service that sticks around is iptables; FireHOL doesn't have anything of itself to monitor with a subsys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151124.n4FBONHD019138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:24:22 EDT --- Builds OK in Koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1355896 Comment: the name of the executable is 'wannier90.x'. Not a blocker, but a little unusual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151127.n4FBR3u6019920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 07:27:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > * Fri May 15 2009 Richard W.M. Jones - 1.0.1-3 > > - Use the upstream SRPM directly, unpacking source from it. > - License is GPLv2+. The license is not GPLv2+, it's GPL+ (also GPLv1 is OK). See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F The source code doesn't mention any version, it just states that the code is under the GPL. => License field must be GPL+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151128.n4FBSpY5025530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:28:50 EDT --- rpmlint says: wannier90-devel.i586: W: no-documentation It would be worth adding at least the license file to this package, I think. wannier90-libs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libwannier.so You probably want to strip this one, although I guess this might break debuginfo. wannier90-libs.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libwannier.so This is a consequence of upstream's peculiar build process. Persuade them to use libtool :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151131.n4FBVrwB020919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:31:52 EDT --- Comment: Would be worth including the examples/ subdirectory from the source, particularly since it is mentioned in the README file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151129.n4FBThtu025783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 07:29:42 EDT --- If you want, you can shorten cd %{name}-%{version} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} cp zerofree $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir} to a one-liner: install -D -p -m 755 %{name}-%{version}/zerofree $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_sbindir}/zerofree (This also preserves the time stamp, even though it doesn't matter in case of a compiled binary.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151141.n4FBfTD2028833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #4 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 07:41:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Would you check if the following build.log what you expect? > ---------------------------------------- > Optional engines support: > xine engine ................: yes > libvlc engine ..............: no > MPlayer engine .............: no > xine-lib engine ............: no > GStreamer library engine ...: no > ---------------------------------------- > It seems that "xine-lib engine" "GStreamer library engine" > can be enabled with some BRs in Fedora and some configure option, > however configure.ac says they are experimental so > I am not sure if you intentionally disabled this or not. Of course, I investigates this. The other engines are experimental, and I do not think that is smart to compile on Fedora something what is "experimental" ;) This is documented in config help: ---------------------------------------------- --enable-xine-engine Enable Xine engine support (default disabled) --enable-mplayer-engine Enable experimental MPlayer engine support (default disabled) --enable-libvlc-engine Enable experimental VLC library engine support (default disabled) --enable-xine-lib-engine Enable experimental xine-lib engine support (default disabled) --enable-libgstreamer-engine Enable experimental GStreamer library engine support (default enabled) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ But if you think that it is all right to be compiled with these engines, no problem, I will compile :) > However xine binary is in xine package, which is in > rpmfusion-free. Does this software work even if > "xine" rpm is removed? Me TV has own xine engine and xine-lib build inside itself. So, I think that it do not need any xine dependency. Does this program work without "xine" rpm I still do not sure, but I'll investigate this, too. This is the part of Me TV's /src directory list: ----------------------------------------------------------------- 6200 2009-05-02 01:40 xine_engine.cc 1554 2009-05-02 01:43 xine_engine.h 277256 2009-05-14 15:32 xine_engine.o 12210 2009-03-27 13:45 xine_lib_engine.cc 2209 2009-05-08 12:38 xine_lib_engine.h 60648 2009-05-14 15:32 xine_lib_engine.o ----------------------------------------------------------------- I investigated licenses for Me TV and Xine, and all of these sources are under GPL license, so I can not find a reason why should not to be packaged for Fedora repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151146.n4FBkwr8023840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:46:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree-1.0.1-4.fc11.src.rpm I have made the two changes you suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151142.n4FBgiGe023057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 07:42:43 EDT --- ? rpmlint output Please see comment 4. I think at least some of these are worth fixing. + package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines + specfile name matches the package base name + package should satisfy packaging guidelines + license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora GPLv2+ + license matches the actual package license + %doc includes license file + spec file written in American English + spec file is legible + upstream sources match sources in the srpm 2a547276e25d2345480ec3717c6c2f3f / 6259705 + package successfully builds on at least one architecture built in Koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* + binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + does not use Prefix: /usr + package owns all directories it creates + no duplicate files in %files + %defattr line + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + consistent use of macros + package must contain code or permissible content n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage (documentation is 740K unpacked, but this is still not a really significant part of the whole package) + files marked %doc should not affect package + header files should be in -devel n/a static libraries should be in -static n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' + libfoo.so must go in -devel (in -libs, which is also OK) + -devel must require the fully versioned base (requires -libs, which is OK) + packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc. + filenames must be valid UTF-8 Optional: n/a if there is no license file, packager should query upstream n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if available + reviewer should build the package in mock + the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures + review should test the package functions as described (I tested it ran on the examples) + scriptlets should be sane n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel + shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or /usr/sbin ----- I would like to hear your feedback on comments 3, 4 and 5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:45:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:45:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151145.n4FBjIG0029525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #5 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 07:45:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Please see http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299 Hmm, I read it, but I still can not find any non-GPL licenses info under this source, and all dependencies what its call is on Fedora repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 11:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 07:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151159.n4FBxhkr026084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 07:59:41 EDT --- Needed changes: - the license field should be "ASL 2.0". Source files has "ASL 2.0" license. - instructions for generating Source0 are broken -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151205.n4FC5crE001398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 08:05:37 EDT --- Everything has been fixed, the package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500264] Pre-Review Request: plexus-resources - Plexus Component Descriptor Creator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151211.n4FCBIqJ028917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500264 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 08:11:17 EDT --- Needed fixes: - License is wrong. Most of the source files has MIT license header and the rest don't have any license header, so I assume the license should be changed to MIT. - Instructions for generating Source0 are not full. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151210.n4FCAGHX002685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 08:10:15 EDT --- Thanks Jussi! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zerofree Short Description: Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500265] Pre-Review Request: plexus-naming - Plexus Naming Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151218.n4FCIgwQ030313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500265 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 08:18:41 EDT --- Needed changes: - There is nothing about where are sources coming from and I haven't found it in plexus svn. - I haven't found anything about the license in the provided sources. If the license is correct it should become ASL 2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:25:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:25:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151225.n4FCPaKk032145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #6 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-15 08:25:34 EDT --- The problem is not the license, but with patents, because without patented codecs the me-tv application is useless.(In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Please see http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=299 > > Hmm, I read it, but I still can not find any non-GPL licenses info under this > source, and all dependencies what its call is on Fedora repo. The problem is not the license, but patents, because without patented codecs the me-tv application is useless. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500266] Pre-Review Request: plexus-registry - Plexus Registry Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151229.n4FCTYrG000470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500266 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 08:29:33 EDT --- Needed changes: - license should become ASL 2.0 - Source0 fetch instructions are not full - if the rest of the Sources are generated with mvn ant:ant it should be mentioned -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:34:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151234.n4FCY3pj008319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #29 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 08:33:59 EDT --- I did build it: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1304544 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151233.n4FCXaCO008174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #28 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 08:33:32 EDT --- The JSON package is done (although I may have forgotten to build it ... will check). I don't know about the JBoss JAR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151237.n4FCbk5L009504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Wojciech Pilorz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wpilorz at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Wojciech Pilorz 2009-05-15 08:37:44 EDT --- There was a bug report from Hiroshi Kuno on zlib-devel mailing list at Feb 6, 2009: Please find it attached below, as well as response form Mark Adler. I would suggest looking at the bug, as it might propagate to zfstream; --------------------------------------- I found a bug in minizip, when i create a zip file on a FD. That lose a write error (i.e. disk full), and return ZIP_OK. Thus, the minizip make a broken zip file without a error. ** Where is bug. zipCloseFileInZipRaw() in src/contrib/minizip/zip.c 1067 if ((zi->ci.pos_in_buffered_data>0) && (err==ZIP_OK)) 1068 if (zipFlushWriteBuffer(zi)==ZIP_ERRNO) 1069 err = ZIP_ERRNO; /* 1. Here, setting ZIP_ERRNO to "err" */ 1070 1071 if ((zi->ci.method == Z_DEFLATED) && (!zi->ci.raw)) 1072 { 1073 err=deflateEnd(&zi->ci.stream); /* 2. BUG! overwriting defalteEnd()'s return-value(ZIP_OK) to "err" */ 1074 zi->ci.stream_initialised = 0; 1075 } 1076 ** How to fix. I have made a small patch that avoid to overwrite to "err", when "err" has a error code. Would you merge my patch? ndex: /zlib/branches/BUG-write-error/src/contrib/minizip/zip.c =================================================================== --- /zlib/branches/BUG-write-error/src/contrib/minizip/zip.c (revision 537) +++ /zlib/branches/BUG-write-error/src/contrib/minizip/zip.c (revision 566) @@ -1071,5 +1071,6 @@ if ((zi->ci.method == Z_DEFLATED) && (!zi->ci.raw)) { - err=deflateEnd(&zi->ci.stream); + int tmperr=deflateEnd(&zi->ci.stream); + if (err==ZIP_OK) err = tmperr; zi->ci.stream_initialised = 0; } -------------------------------------------- From: xxx (Mark Adler) Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:03:34 -0800 Subject: [Zlib-devel] Patch for losing a write error Hiroshi, Minizip is a contribution to zlib from Gilles Vollant. He is however on this list, so he may respond. Mark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151240.n4FCewwB003582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #7 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 08:40:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > The problem is not the license, but patents, because without patented codecs > the me-tv application is useless. Okey, but where (or on which way) exactly Me TV uses (implements) patented codecs? Just I said earlier, all dependencies needed by this soft are from Fedora repo, not from RPM Fusion (except Xine itself, but I do not know yet, works Me TV without Xine RPM package or not). Are these codecs within the source, if they are why the author of upstream has not written copyright information? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:41:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151241.n4FCfbIc010435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 08:41:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Comment: the name of the executable is 'wannier90.x'. Not a > blocker, but a little unusual. I don't want to break compatibility with upstream, so I'm keeping the name of the binary as is. (In reply to comment #4) > wannier90-devel.i586: W: no-documentation > > It would be worth adding at least the license file to this > package, I think. IMHO it's not needed, since the devel package requires the base package that contains the documentation along with the license. > wannier90-libs.i586: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libwannier.so > > You probably want to strip this one, although I guess this > might break debuginfo. Merged this with the main package, as I made the executable link to the shared library. The warning was caused by find-debuginfo.sh not finding the non-executable library, it works now. > wannier90-libs.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libwannier.so > > This is a consequence of upstream's peculiar build process. > Persuade them to use libtool :-) Upstream builds a static library, I changed the makefile to build a shared library instead. (In reply to comment #5) > Comment: Would be worth including the examples/ subdirectory > from the source, particularly since it is mentioned in the README > file. Done. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/wannier90-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: wannier90.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libwannier.so wannier90-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. These can be ignored, as mentioned above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151249.n4FCn4eZ011926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #14 from R P Herrold 2009-05-15 08:49:03 EDT --- I am technically not the upstream -- just the birddog and early packager, at owlriver ... please point to the URL upstream's DL link for Source0 http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/uml/zerofree-1.0.1.tgz -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 12:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 08:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151251.n4FCp8nj012736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #15 from R P Herrold 2009-05-15 08:51:06 EDT --- Thinking about it. you may also want to add the companion: http://intgat.tigress.co.uk/rmy/uml/sparsify.c to the package as well which adds some additional function on making a more slender FS -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151315.n4FDFsxT011301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 09:15:53 EDT --- Needed changes: - License should become ASL 2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151314.n4FDEnTI017647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-15 09:14:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I would suggest looking at the bug, as it might propagate to zfstream; Thanks for the report. zfstream is fine however, as it does not include minizip (anymore), but links to minizip provided by the zlib and mingw32-zlib packages. So this bug needs to be fixed in zlib (mingw32-zlib), then zfstream is automatically fixed, as it links dynamically to the minizip DLL / shared lib. Have you reported the bug against zlib and mingw32-zlib? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151317.n4FDHCKM018365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #8 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-15 09:17:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > > The problem is not the license, but patents, because without patented codecs > > the me-tv application is useless. > > Okey, but where (or on which way) exactly Me TV uses (implements) patented > codecs? Just I said earlier, all dependencies needed by this soft are from It either calls an external application (like Xine) or is linked with a library that does the decoding (ffmpeg via libxine, etc). You must have the backend to actually see anything and the backend decodes MPEG streams. > Fedora repo, not from RPM Fusion (except Xine itself, but I do not know yet, > works Me TV without Xine RPM package or not). Me-TV can be started without Xine, but cannot be used if using means watching the TV. > Are these codecs within the source, if they are why the author of upstream has > not written copyright information? Please read the discussion in my RPM Fusion review request referenced in comment #3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151336.n4FDaiZq015726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #9 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 09:36:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > > Me-TV can be started without Xine, but cannot be used if using means watching > the TV. OK, that is something what I do not know yet... Bu if you sure, then it is a good reason why should not to be on Fedora repo. It's OK for me. I can packaged this for RPM Fusion, but there is a packager for this. The only problem is that packaging seems to be abandoned. (no changes from 2009-02-17) If there are problems with some engines inside Me TV please notify that all of them (excluding xine) are experimental! So what is your suggestion about this program? Do you want package Me-TV for Fedora's users? I want! According to this, there is my new SPEC and SRPM: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/me-tv.spec http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/me-tv-0.8.12-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:38:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:38:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] New: Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Summary: Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xine-ui.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xine-ui-0.99.5-7.fc10.src.rpm Upstream url: http://www.xine-project.org/ Description: xine-ui is the default GUI for xine-lib. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151341.n4FDf9TS023488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 09:41:08 EDT --- See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 for review of xine-ui (xine in rpmfusion). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151351.n4FDpMpP018936@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 09:51:21 EDT --- spot, can we get confirmation that .pom files are exempt from licensing and URL checks? This will be an issue for a lot of these packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151356.n4FDu3oq020180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 09:56:02 EDT --- Needed changes: - License should become ASL 2.0 - URL is wrong. Shoule be http://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151355.n4FDtGUm027079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-15 09:55:15 EDT --- Just for clarification, is a POM equivalent to a spec file for java? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 13:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 09:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151356.n4FDuqYK027436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 09:56:51 EDT --- Thanks, Fernando. I'd still like to see some comments about the XML source files stating that they're only for building but that's a Review thing :) I'm okay with the latest SRPM for pre-review. I'm going to set the review flag but someone please change it if that is incorrect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151405.n4FE5T44022763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 10:05:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Just for clarification, is a POM equivalent to a spec file for java? It's like a spec file for maven builds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151414.n4FEE6Ht031724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #11 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-15 10:14:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > > Me-TV can be started without Xine, but cannot be used if using means watching > > the TV. > > OK, that is something what I do not know yet... Bu if you sure, then it is a > good reason why should not to be on Fedora repo. > > It's OK for me. I can packaged this for RPM Fusion, but there is a packager for > this. I am the packager in RPM Fusion, but feel free to start a new review or takeover the existing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151414.n4FEEhYc024290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-15 10:14:42 EDT --- It would be nice if these were collected in a central upstream location, perhaps a git repo for "java POMs". From a legal perspective, I doubt these are copyrightable works, unless they have much more complexity than Fernando has illustrated. So, for licensing purposes, I don't see any reason to worry about the POM files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151416.n4FEG4eS032627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 10:16:03 EDT --- Changes needed: - Instructions for generating Source0 are not full - License should become ASL 2.0 - Better description will help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151422.n4FEMMi9026561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 10:22:21 EDT --- Changes needed: - License should be ASL 2.0 - at least this is the license in the headers of the source files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151424.n4FEO5Dp001977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 10:24:05 EDT --- OK, I checked the updated package, and this now looks good. ------------------------------ APPROVED by rjones ------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151424.n4FEOQx4027087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151422.n4FEMjo9026813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501017] New: Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501017 Summary: Review Request: libtnc - Library implementation of the Trusted Network Connect (TNC) specification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libtnc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/libtnc-1.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Koji Scratch Build (dist-f11): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1356162 Description: This library provides functions for loading and interfacing with loadable IMC Integrity Measurement Collector (IMC) and Integrity Measurement Verifier (IMV) modules as required by the Trusted Network Computing (TNC) IF-IMC and IF-IMV interfaces as described in: https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/specs/TNC -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151425.n4FEPGgu027564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 10:25:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > It would be nice if these were collected in a central upstream location, > perhaps a git repo for "java POMs". I *think* (this is from hearsay) that they're all in the maven's repo upstream. But I really have no idea. > So, for licensing purposes, I don't see any reason to worry about the POM > files. Thanks. Pre-review is approved for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151427.n4FERtTv002816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-15 10:27:54 EDT --- Needed changes: - License should become ASL 2.0. This is what's in the source files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:31:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:31:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151431.n4FEV2Mx028878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 10:31:01 EDT --- After spot's comments on another bug about .pom files being exempt from licensing due to their simplicity, I think the only thing necessary is the license change. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:28:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:28:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151428.n4FESgJw028172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 10:28:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wannier90 Short Description: Maximally-localised Wannier functions Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151431.n4FEVjR1003954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #4 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 10:31:44 EDT --- spot, if you have a sec, please comment on comment #2 from Jerry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500259] Pre-Review Request: javacvs - Netbeans CVS module and library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151433.n4FEXIrL029185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500259 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 10:33:17 EDT --- I forgot to post a link to the licensing table: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151438.n4FEcFV1030258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 10:38:14 EDT --- Given Russ herrold's comments above, I have prepared a new package. This package changes the upstream URL (and removes the whole unpacking-the-SRPM thing). More importantly it also includes the sparsify program. I'll leave it up to you (Jussi) whether you want to reopen the review of this package. Here it is: Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint is still clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151448.n4FEmecq006865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 10:48:39 EDT --- No, the package is fine as it is; sparsify is also under GPL+ and doesn't raise any other issues. What's up with the changelog, though? You've merged all of the changes of the interstitial specs together? Please, keep a full changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151452.n4FEq6EJ000470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #18 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 10:52:06 EDT --- Ah I was just keeping them all under the same date heading, but I can split them out if you like / in future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 14:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 10:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151449.n4FEnItR032234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-15 10:49:16 EDT --- Ask upstream. If you can't get an answer from them, either drop the file or the package entirely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151516.n4FFGEhM015491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 11:16:13 EDT --- Copied the CVS request down here to make it easier to find: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: zerofree Short Description: Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151521.n4FFL1cT016349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151520.n4FFKbfg016268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #3 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-15 11:20:36 EDT --- Latest koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1356256 Note: for the next version you could consider choosing a stock icon and maybe add MimeType to the desktop entry. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151522.n4FFMk5g009868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151525.n4FFPw0q010652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 11:25:54 EDT --- The license header is wrong, it should be just GPLv2+. The license header refers to the license of the compiled binary; even if the sources are under (GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT and Public Domain and BSD) every license used is compatible with GPLv2+ which thus overrides everything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:27:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:27:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151527.n4FFRlG3010915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 11:27:46 EDT --- Should I [upstream] be looking at any patches? It's also possible I can push this to an open, public repository if people are interested in making serious contributions and/or pushing the project in new directions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151538.n4FFcB6L019671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 --- Comment #5 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-15 11:38:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The following items need to be addressed: > 1. License seems to be called "Revolution Software Freeware License" > (http://liberatedgames.org/licenses/Revolution_Software_Freeware_License.txt). > Does this affect the naming of the License in the spec? Is this GPLv2+ at all? > > When the license question is cleared out I will approve this package. Hmm, I've no idea how I ended up with GPLv2+ in the license tag here, a copy and paste error probably, sorry. The correct license tag should be: License: Freely redistributable without restriction The license has been checked (for another Revolution_Software_Freeware_License game) and been ok-ed by Spot: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-November/msg00030.html Here is an updated version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-international.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-international-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm p.s. 1) Can you also review drascula-music please, after some discussion it was decided it is better to have the music in a separate package instead of having it in the main package, see bug 494197 2) How are things going with the openttd open content package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151538.n4FFclQG013575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-15 11:38:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > drascula-audio has been removed from main drascula package. Thanks, Felix can you continue / restart the review then please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151545.n4FFjqiL015603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 11:45:51 EDT --- Or, you can specify the license as License: GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:43:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:43:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151543.n4FFhpHh014883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 11:43:49 EDT --- - Source URL should be Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libavc1394/libavc1394-%{version}.tar.gz - Patch should be patch0 - Use BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) - Devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig - You can probably use %configure --disable-static to prevent shared library from being built, then you don't have to remove it. - What is newer libtool needed for? Autoreconf'ing is quite a brutal operation. ** rpmlint output: libavc1394.src: W: no-url-tag libavc1394.x86_64: W: no-url-tag libavc1394.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided libavc1394_0 libavc1394.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided librpm1394_0 libavc1394-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag libavc1394-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libavc1394-0.5.3/test/dvcont.c libavc1394-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag libavc1394-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. - Url should be URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/libavc1394/ - Remove executable permission in %setup phase. - Other warnings can be ignored. ** MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - Library is under LGPLv2+, files under test/ are under GPLv2+. Change License: field to GPLv2+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - After fixing source URL is OK. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install to preserve time stamps. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add AUTHORS and TODO to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. NEEDSWORK - Add Requires: pkgconfig to devel. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151549.n4FFnNm9022137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 11:49:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Should I [upstream] be looking at any patches? > > It's also possible I can push this to an open, public repository > if people are interested in making serious contributions and/or > pushing the project in new directions. You can maybe ask for the Fedora Artwork team to make an icon for this. Do you want to (co)/maintain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151551.n4FFpS4F016821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 11:51:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Latest koji build: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1356256 > > Note: for the next version you could consider choosing a stock icon and maybe > add MimeType to the desktop entry. Good job on the review. Keep up the good work! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151551.n4FFpmXU023029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-15 11:51:47 EDT --- Requested CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:54:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:54:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151554.n4FFs7QD017302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-15 11:54:06 EDT --- Sure, I don't mind co-maintaining. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151603.n4FG3qxs025571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:03:51 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 15:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 11:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151559.n4FFxxJZ024777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 11:59:58 EDT --- Well, when you make a new release upstream you can push it in Fedora as well :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rpmdepsize Short Description: A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies Owners: rjones, jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151600.n4FG0pfS025175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-15 12:00:49 EDT --- Actually, "ASL 2.0 and Plexus". See plexus-classworlds Pre-Review. The Source files with no URL or no instructions on how to obtain are like Patch files, produced by the packager. This has been a default for years, perhaps someone should start a Guidelines discussion about local artifacts in general. Yes, you are right, it should be 34. The new spec file is in the same place and we now have: SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-containers-1.0-0.1.a34.6.jpp6.src.rpm with the fixes requested. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151608.n4FG8cR4020702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:08:37 EDT --- Push the update to F-10 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151608.n4FG8qCn020745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:08:51 EDT --- Push the update to F-9 and F-10 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151613.n4FGDlN1027869@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:13:46 EDT --- ping, any progress? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:10:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151610.n4FGAUDD027213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:10:29 EDT --- This seems to be merged, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151611.n4FGBgMU027472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:11:41 EDT --- You need to push the update to F-9 and F-10 and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:15:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:15:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151615.n4FGFEDg022510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:15:12 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151613.n4FGDMgs021931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #2 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-05-15 12:13:22 EDT --- RC 1 is out -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151614.n4FGEsw8022157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(robin.norwood at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #15 from Robin Norwood 2009-05-15 12:14:53 EDT --- Yes, I'll get on it. I probably won't be able to get to it until tomorrow, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:23:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151623.n4FGN2JN029811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-15 12:23:01 EDT --- Well, actually, it's not "wrong", its just "overly thorough". The license on the compiled binary is actually "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT and Public Domain and BSD". In reality, that simplifies down to meaning the exact same thing as "GPLv2+", but it doesn't make the original assertion incorrect. I generally leave it up to maintainers on whether they wish to be overly verbose or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151628.n4FGSWeW030886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #35 from Leonid Kanter 2009-05-15 12:28:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > (In reply to comment #33) > > dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spawn.ExecFailed: > > Cannot launch daemon, file not found or permissions invalid > > Loading configuration plugins > > Using gconf config backend > > Looks like you're running it as root or something like that. No, I was running it as non-privileged user. Looks like it's F11-related problem, because on F10 the same package works perfectly. If you install blueman on ubuntu - it obsoletes gnome-bluetooth package. On Fedora, there are 2 bluetooth icons and gnome-bluetooth must be disabled manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461484] Review Request: twin - Textmode window environment for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151635.n4FGZULJ026465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461484 --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 12:35:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Well, actually, it's not "wrong", its just "overly thorough". The license on > the compiled binary is actually "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT and Public Domain > and BSD". In reality, that simplifies down to meaning the exact same thing as > "GPLv2+", but it doesn't make the original assertion incorrect. > > I generally leave it up to maintainers on whether they wish to be overly > verbose or not. Right; it's more of an issue of clarity and terseness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 16:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 12:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151633.n4FGXpWd025914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-15 12:33:50 EDT --- Some notes: * About Patch1 - Would you explain why you want to change Name= item from "xine" to "Xine"? ?? About dlopen'ing libX11.so in src/aaui/main.c - ... however: -------------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1 at localhost bin]$ ldd -r ./aaxine | grep libX11 libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00793000) -------------------------------------------------------- I may be wrong, however would you explain why this dlopen() is really needed? * Timestamps - Add INSTALL="install -p" on 'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files * desktop-file-install - You don't have to delete desktop file under %_builddir (--delete-original). Note that currently $ rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit will fail due to this. * Scriptlets - Update GTK icon cache update scriptlets: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache * %files - Would you explain why two different desktop files are installed under different places? ---------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/applications/xine.desktop /usr/share/xine/desktop/xine.desktop ---------------------------------------------------------- Note that these two differs slightly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:01:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:01:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151701.n4FH1Z3u031138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-15 13:01:34 EDT --- Things look good to me. Pre-review passed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151727.n4FHRxw4010108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 13:27:57 EDT --- sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151730.n4FHU1Mh010625@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 13:30:00 EDT --- sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:34:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:34:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151734.n4FHYql8011342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-15 13:34:51 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-coverage Short Description: Code coverage testing module for Python Owners: spot Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151736.n4FHaBRZ011904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-15 13:36:10 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-morbid Short Description: A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment Owners: spot Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151744.n4FHi8US013403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Chris Bagwell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chris at cnpbagwell.com --- Comment #8 from Chris Bagwell 2009-05-15 13:44:07 EDT --- Just chiming in. I don't have much use for overlapping features of this as well but there are a few items that are not overlapping that I'd like to use. - FSB overclocking. If you have a 900 with infamously slow 16G SSD then this makes a noticeable difference in usability (under Windows XP anyways). - Automatic FSB overclocking. By that I mean something that monitors when your on battery power and disables overclocking and also notifiws you. Not sure I wish to use this feature unless the daemon is also actively monitoring CPU temp. and also disabling. Going purely from Comment #6 it might not be... but then whats the related "smart fan control" about? - Tray menu to disable Webcam and Card Reader. Looking around /sys/bus, it looks like the onboard card reader does not support auto suspending. It would be nice to disable that device when on battery for extended periods. Disabling Wifi and Bluetooth overlaps with keyboard toggles but a common menu for all devives would be nice. Overclocking is a questionable reason to package this since harm could occur to hardware... but the power savings feature of disabling hardware is more interesting. Current rawhide is looking very good, power wise, and I have no numbers to back up disabling card reader or webcam results in noticeable savings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 17:55:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 13:55:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151755.n4FHtYv3009577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 13:55:32 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151811.n4FIB9TA012601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 14:11:08 EDT --- python-coverage-2.85-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-coverage-2.85-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151811.n4FIBEvZ019332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 14:11:13 EDT --- python-coverage-2.85-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-coverage-2.85-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151817.n4FIHaNg020573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 14:17:35 EDT --- python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151817.n4FIHfJF020604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 14:17:40 EDT --- python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151829.n4FITxLF015658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #8 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-15 14:29:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ping, any progress? > upstream suggests separating the libraries out. the packages that would require this: pmgZ: GPLv2+ (http://www.fetk.org/codes/pmg/index.html) maloc: GPLv2+ (http://www.fetk.org/codes/maloc/index.html) aqua: no license info available, can't locate source online opal: LBNLBSD (http://nbcr.net/software/opal/) python-ZSI: already available for fedora. the last two aren't required for the apbs binary, only for server-client applications utilizing apbs. I should also note the licenses are different some of the web based downloads than those included with apbs (e.g. maloc carries LGPLv2+ headers in the apbs download). I'll get in touch with upstream again re. the licensing/availability of aqua. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:52:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:52:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151852.n4FIqAIa020800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151852.n4FIqWa9028206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151853.n4FIrgdR028432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #11 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-05-15 14:53:41 EDT --- The build errors under F11 and F12 have been fixed. The pkgconfig data of one of the Gnome packages has changed which resulted in a missing include directive, which was not generated by configure. All dependencies have been checked, but it turned out this was the only one. Additionally, the man pages which were not in UTF-8 have been converted to UTF-8 upstream. Current status: - The package is released upstream with a new release number (2.0.14). - All earlier review suggestions have been included (except for the gettext suggestion where the package follows the recommendations from the Packaging Guidelines). - rpmlint reports no errors, no warnings. - The package builds cleanly on F10, F11 and F12 via a Koji scratch build. Spec URL: http://savannah.inetbridge.net/bubblemon/fedora-stage/gnome-applet-bubblemon.spec SRPM URL: http://savannah.inetbridge.net/bubblemon/fedora-stage/gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm I would like to request a final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151858.n4FIwftr029560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 14:58:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some notes: > > * About Patch1 > - Would you explain why you want to change Name= item > from "xine" to "Xine"? Good question. This was in the rpmfusion package. I dropped the patch altogether. > ?? About dlopen'ing libX11.so in src/aaui/main.c > - ... however: > -------------------------------------------------------- > [tasaka1 at localhost bin]$ ldd -r ./aaxine | grep libX11 > libX11.so.6 => /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x00793000) > -------------------------------------------------------- > I may be wrong, however would you explain why this > dlopen() is really needed? I don't know, this is from the rpmfusion package and I don't know why it is necessary. The sed is needed however since the unversioned .so file is provided by libX11-devel instead of libX11. > * Timestamps > - Add INSTALL="install -p" on 'make install' to keep timestamps > on installed files Fixed, thanks for the reminder (I was going to fix this earlier but forgot). I also fixed the charset conversion to preserve timestamps. > * desktop-file-install > - You don't have to delete desktop file under %_builddir > (--delete-original). Note that currently > $ rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit will fail due to this. Done. > * Scriptlets > - Update GTK icon cache update scriptlets: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache This was already partly done, but I rewrote the part to use the snippets above. Also added the missing mimetype refresh. > > * %files > - Would you explain why two different desktop files are installed > under different places? > ---------------------------------------------------------- > /usr/share/applications/xine.desktop > /usr/share/xine/desktop/xine.desktop > ---------------------------------------------------------- > Note that these two differs slightly. Good question. Removed the other one. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xine-ui.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xine-ui-0.99.5-8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 18:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 14:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151851.n4FIpsJK020748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-05-15 14:51:52 EDT --- Side notes: 1.0.8 is out ######################################### # MUST ITEMS ######################################### --> rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Status: PASS Additional comments: [lvillani at normandy SPECS (master)]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-i386/result/python-repoze-what-1.0.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --> The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines Status: PASS --> The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Status: PASS Additional comments: Exemption: It's a python package --> The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines Status: PASS Additional comments: Looks good --> The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Status: PASS Additional comments: However, the package provides a BSD-like license (such licenses are not listed in the License page) --> The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Status: PASS Additional comments: See above --> If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Status: PASS --> The spec file must be written in American English. Status: PASS --> The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Status: PASS --> The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Status: PASS --> The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Status: PASS Additional comments: It does: mock profile Config(fedora-11-i386) --> If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Status: PASS Additional comments: It's a noarch package --> All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Status: PASS --> The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Status: PASS --> Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Status: PASS --> If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Status: PASS --> A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Status: PASS --> A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Status: PASS --> Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Status: PASS --> Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Status: PASS --> Each package must consistently use macros. Status: PASS --> The package must contain code, or permissable content. Status: PASS --> Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Status: FAIL Additional comments: You are not shipping the documentation files in docs/ --> If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Status: PASS --> Header files must be in a -devel package. Status: PASS Additional comments: No header files --> Static libraries must be in a -static package. Status: PASS Additional comments: No static libraries --> Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Status: PASS Additional comments: No pkgconfig files --> If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Status: PASS Additional comments: No native libraries --> In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Status: PASS Additional comments: No devel packages --> Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Status: PASS --> Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Status: PASS Additional comments: non-GUI --> Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Status: PASS --> At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Status: PASS --> All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Status: PASS ######################################### # SHOULD ITEMS ######################################### --> If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Status: FAIL Additional comments: If possible, do that --> The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Status: FAIL --> The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Status: PASS --> The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Status: PASS Additional comments: Cannot test, I don't have PPC builders, however, this is a noarch package. Marking as PASS. --> The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Status: PASS --> If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Status: PASS Additional comments: No scriptlets --> Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. Status: PASS Additional comments: No subpkgs --> The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb.If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Status: PASS Additional comments: No pkgconfig files Generated with reviewtool 0.0.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151944.n4FJiNCd008780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #12 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 15:44:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > I am the packager in RPM Fusion, but feel free to start a new review or > takeover the existing one. Ok, than. Xine RPM packet is needed for run Me TV. In that case, we must close this thread and continue to resolve RPM Fusion's Dan, I suggest that we use this mine spec if you agree? Of course, I call Tasaka to help us at RPM Fusion... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151952.n4FJqRps010642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |500926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 19:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905151952.n4FJqQV1010615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |501006 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 15:52:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > > > I am the packager in RPM Fusion, but feel free to start a new review or > > takeover the existing one. > > Ok, than. Xine RPM packet is needed for run Me TV. > > In that case, we must close this thread and continue to resolve RPM Fusion's > > Dan, I suggest that we use this mine spec if you agree? > Of course, I call Tasaka to help us at RPM Fusion... I think xine is OK for inclusion into Fedora, since all of the requirements are already in Fedora. I'm adding the xine review as a blocker on this one. There's no problem in getting this one into Fedora, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 20:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 16:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152022.n4FKMwtP017763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #14 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 16:22:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > > I think xine is OK for inclusion into Fedora, since all of the requirements are > already in Fedora. I'm adding the xine review as a blocker on this one. > > There's no problem in getting this one into Fedora, too. Super, then bring Xine to Fedora and leave Me TV on Fedora, too. But in this case, we must remove Xine from RPM Fusion... Or, for the first time keep parallel packages of Xine on both repos, but with different names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 20:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 16:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152029.n4FKT3o3011133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 16:29:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > Super, then bring Xine to Fedora and leave Me TV on Fedora, too. > > But in this case, we must remove Xine from RPM Fusion... > > Or, for the first time keep parallel packages of Xine on both repos, but with > different names. Yeah, if/when xine (i.e. xine-ui) gets in Fedora it should be removed from RPM Fusion. There's no need to remove it, though, just as long as no-one updates it any more (the Fedora package has higher EVR and will be preferred over it). I'm just waiting for someone to review the xine package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 20:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 16:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152041.n4FKfEHV022300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #16 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 16:41:13 EDT --- > > I'm just waiting for someone to review the xine package. You mean, your package? Tasaka wrote some observations, isn't it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 20:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 16:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152055.n4FKtAEi025248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 16:55:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > > > I'm just waiting for someone to review the xine package. > > You mean, your package? > > Tasaka wrote some observations, isn't it? Yeah. He did, but no-one has proclaimed the review yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 21:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 17:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152110.n4FLAoTU020635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #18 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-15 17:10:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Yeah. He did, but no-one has proclaimed the review yet. But you are sponsor on Fedora, so sponsors need sponsor to make review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 21:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 17:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152123.n4FLNK8Y023058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Nussbaumer 2009-05-15 17:23:19 EDT --- Thanks for your second review. > Found an rpmlint warning: Sorry my mistake, I used the %doc macro in my changelog comment. Updated SPEC: http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover.spec Updated SRPM: http://www.firetux.ch/download/fedora/netdiscover-0.3-3.20090503cvs.fc10.src.rpm I asked upstream if they plan to publish a new release in the future and if there's active development but didn't receive an answer yet. I'll post as soon as I get an answer. Kind regards, Patrick Nussbaumer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 21:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 17:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152138.n4FLcVYY025965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-15 17:38:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > Yeah. He did, but no-one has proclaimed the review yet. > > But you are sponsor on Fedora, so sponsors need sponsor to make review? Nope, anyone with packager rights is enough There'd be little sense in becoming a sponsor if you then would need other sponsors to review your packages :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152317.n4FNHHTq010032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #36 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-05-15 19:17:16 EDT --- No RPM left behind! Built Blueman 1.10-2 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1356989 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1356994 Spec: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/Blueman.spec SRPM: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/blueman-1.10-1.fc11.src I'm deeply sorry for being so late on providing the simple fixes. Work caught the best of me, and some Fedora 11 issues stopped me from fully migrating. I'm looking into a way to obsolete the old gnome-bluetooth once this is installed, any suggestions are appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRFYl011990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:27:14 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRJUR012031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.4.0-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152326.n4FNQHp6011784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.10-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:26:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152326.n4FNQCZh019197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:26:11 EDT --- perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152326.n4FNQsSU019357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:26:53 EDT --- perl-Data-Report-0.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRoto019567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.4.0-3.fc10 |2.4.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRw8A019611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:27:56 EDT --- globus-gsi-callback-1.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152326.n4FNQxaL019399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.10-1.fc11 |0.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRjA9012362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:27:45 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152329.n4FNT63l012623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:29:05 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRYHe012166@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:27:33 EDT --- EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152331.n4FNV0im013497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.4-1.fc10 |0.2.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152328.n4FNS3P4012421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-1.fc10 |1.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNUL2m013313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.8-3.b7.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152329.n4FNTAJX012668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.10-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152328.n4FNSu8B012568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:28:55 EDT --- xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xfce4-notifyd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4698 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152327.n4FNRdoY012325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.04.03-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152329.n4FNTs2f020229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:29:52 EDT --- powwow-1.2.15-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152332.n4FNWrf3021469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:32:52 EDT --- clthreads-2.4.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494283] Review Request: mingw32-libp11 - MingGW Windows libp11 library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNUtTi020882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494283 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:30:54 EDT --- mingw32-libp11-0.2.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNU55H020609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:30:04 EDT --- perl-Text-CSV-1.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNUiie020788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:30:43 EDT --- expatmm-1.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491566] Review Request: powwow - A console MUD client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152329.n4FNTxro020268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491566 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2.15-1.fc10 |1.2.15-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152333.n4FNXN46021615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:33:21 EDT --- ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNUGnE020692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:30:15 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152334.n4FNYYWq021884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:34:33 EDT --- EekBoek-1.04.03-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNUAT4020661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.10-1.fc10 |1.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499913] Review Request: expatmm - C++ wrapper for the expat XML parser library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152330.n4FNUmlP020828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499913 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498862] Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152332.n4FNWvUJ014240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.4.0-3.fc11 |2.4.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152335.n4FNZoHE015386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:35:50 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152334.n4FNYucv014752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.0.5-4.fc11 |2.0.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:33:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:33:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152333.n4FNXSq8014429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.5-4.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152334.n4FNYp9B022348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-15 19:34:49 EDT --- ucommon-2.0.5-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152335.n4FNZsvW022873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.8-3.b7.fc10 |0.0.8-3.b7.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152334.n4FNYdhV022058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.04.03-3.fc10 |1.04.03-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152340.n4FNewul016497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:40:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152344.n4FNiM8a024187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:44:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152342.n4FNgC5i024026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:42:11 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152345.n4FNjUMY017301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:45:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:43:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152343.n4FNhPLE016698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:43:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152351.n4FNpjVw018152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:51:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152353.n4FNrkG4025761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:53:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152352.n4FNqp73025680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:52:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495564] Review Request: libguestfs - Access and modify virtual machine disk images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152350.n4FNolUJ025420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495564 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:50:45 EDT --- Just follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life for the f10 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152359.n4FNxBbI026611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:59:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152354.n4FNslrx025914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:54:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152357.n4FNvMAL026479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:57:20 EDT --- Can you add a cvs template here so I know what you want? Reset the flag when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 15 23:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 19:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905152358.n4FNw3tx019046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 19:58:01 EDT --- Can you add a cvs template here so I know what you need? Reset the cvs flag when ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 00:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 20:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160003.n4G03mYN027631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 20:03:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 00:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 20:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160002.n4G02pWi027541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 20:02:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 00:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 20:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500902] Review Request: kdelibs-experimental - KDE libraries with experimental or unstable api/abi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160002.n4G022Gb027459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500902 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-15 20:02:01 EDT --- > If possible clone acl's from existing kdelibs, if that's a hassle, no biggie. I don't see an easy way to do that. ;( cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 00:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 20:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160059.n4G0xK8b027895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #30 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-15 20:59:19 EDT --- Great, let's move with this review forwards then:) I'd appreciate somebody (probably the reporter;) to make a scratch build again so that I can find out whether jbossweb2 will provide jboss-common-jdbc-wrapper.jar which I need to update mysql-connector-java from a years-old-and-nothing-providing version to current. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 01:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160103.n4G13SsQ004233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #31 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-15 21:03:26 EDT --- ...just forgot: Andrew, would you mind building and releasing json as an update for F9/10/11? It will enable doing the same with jbossweb2 later on, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 01:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 21:06:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160106.n4G16CE0029258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-15 21:06:11 EDT --- Thanks Edwin, here we go: The new package fixes all outstanding issues: OK - rpmlint is silent OK - builds in mock on rawhide as well as F-11 OK - all files are UTF-8 and therefore the package is APPROVED. One last thing: I suggest to also require gnome-system-monitor, since it is in the right click menu. But you can change this after import into CVS. I have just sponsored you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 04:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 00:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160440.n4G4ebLe006396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #37 from Rajeesh 2009-05-16 00:40:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > I'm looking into a way to obsolete the old gnome-bluetooth once this is > installed, any suggestions are appreciated. A simple "Obsoletes: gnome-bluetooth" directive in the spec file will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 05:04:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 01:04:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160504.n4G54GvF001729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #39 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-05-16 01:04:14 EDT --- I made a Spec that obsoletes bluetooth-applet, since that's the dual-icon showing up. Obsoleting gnome-bluetooth brings dependency issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 05:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 01:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160502.n4G52Vwv001541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #38 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-16 01:02:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > I'm deeply sorry for being so late on providing the simple fixes. Work caught > the best of me, and some Fedora 11 issues stopped me from fully migrating. Thanks, will look into those. > I'm looking into a way to obsolete the old gnome-bluetooth once this is > installed, any suggestions are appreciated. I believe the best thing you can do here is nothing and you should leave it up to the user. (In reply to comment #37) > (In reply to comment #36) > > I'm looking into a way to obsolete the old gnome-bluetooth once this is > > installed, any suggestions are appreciated. > > A simple "Obsoletes: gnome-bluetooth" directive in the spec file will do. Definitely not. You shouldn't obsolete other packages without approval of the package maintainer. Especially if both are maintained; let the user choose. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 06:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160615.n4G6FPRY012093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 02:15:23 EDT --- Now ucommon should build also on dist-f12, please try. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 06:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 02:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] New: Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML Alias: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-RSS-LibXML/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-RSS-LibXML.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: XML::RSS::LibXML uses XML::LibXML (libxml2) for parsing RSS instead of XML::RSS' XML::Parser (expat), while trying to keep interface compatibility with XML::RSS. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1357637 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 07:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 03:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery Alias: perl-XML-Feed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/XML-Feed/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-Feed.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: XML::Feed is a syndication feed parser for both RSS and Atom feeds. It also implements feed auto-discovery for finding feeds, given a URI. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1357657 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 07:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 03:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160708.n4G78Ieb026663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #40 from Michal Ingeli 2009-05-16 03:08:17 EDT --- Two bluetooth icons is not an issue. User can still decide which bluetooth app he/she will use and disable one of them in gnome session manager. Obsoleting package, that provides almost same functionality will force user to choose only one to install. There is no real reason for doing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 07:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 03:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501101] New: Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501101 Summary: Review Request: emacs-color-theme - elisp mode to customize emacs look and feel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fargiolas at gnome.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~fargiolas/color-theme/emacs-color-theme.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~fargiolas/color-theme/emacs-color-theme-6.6.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: color-theme is an emacs mode that provides a lot of different presets to customize emacs faces. It also includes a little framework to easily create new themes from your own customizations and submit them to the maintainer. Check http://www.nongnu.org/color-theme/ and http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/ColorTheme for more informations. This is my first package, usually I'm not too much interested into packaging stuff, but this is one of the first things I always install right after the distribution, so it shouldn't be hard to keep the spec file up to date. Anyway, I'm also fine if someone else wants to take its maintainership for me (it's pretty trivial, I'm not sure it's worth to go into the whole sponsorship, account requesting thing just for this tiny package :P). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 08:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 04:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160814.n4G8E1QK003981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-16 04:14:00 EDT --- rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 08:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 04:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160811.n4G8BvI6003790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-16 04:11:56 EDT --- rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 08:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 04:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160823.n4G8NqJN006074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-16 04:23:51 EDT --- wannier90-1.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wannier90-1.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 08:22:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 04:22:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160822.n4G8MaF9005888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-16 04:22:36 EDT --- wannier90-1.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wannier90-1.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 08:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 04:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160843.n4G8h28m009031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #7 from John Haxby 2009-05-16 04:43:01 EDT --- 2.0-rc1 is available now. Is there any chance of this making it into F11? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 09:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 05:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225617] Merge Review: bitmap-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160925.n4G9PTEG015188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225617 --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-16 05:25:26 EDT --- This package is currently a bundle of fonts collected from different sources with different licenses. Our font packaging guidelines would call for some splitting here (terminus-fonts is an example of mono-bitmap-font package) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 09:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 05:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160940.n4G9ekJg017640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 09:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 05:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905160941.n4G9fNm6017831@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 11:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 07:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161136.n4GBaS49026442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #27 from David Sugar 2009-05-16 07:36:26 EDT --- checking now. If it builds, do I do a "make update" in devel to push it through so I can build sipwitch? I recall seeing NOT to do so for devel here (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Check_out_the_module), but if not, then how is it made available as a dependency for building sipwitch in rawhide? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161207.n4GC7Mnt007124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #28 from David Sugar 2009-05-16 08:07:21 EDT --- Never mind. sipwitch built fine too now in rawhide/f12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161218.n4GCIwdm000574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo+ --- Comment #9 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-16 08:18:56 EDT --- Tried to fix all %files and subpackages issues, but I feel pretty lost in this. Please, take a look whether my current solution makes sense. (In reply to comment #7) > Regarding index.theme: Is there a nimbus-notification theme? Not sure about that, cannot find anything. Will check > The license is not clear. Is it LGPLv2 or LGPLv2+? Can you ask upstream for > clarification please? I would say that in doubts I would keep it as strict LGPLv2. I will ask upstream (first I have to ask who actually is upstream maintainer). What do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161220.n4GCKBK1009464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo+ | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161220.n4GCKMT7009542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at christoph- | |wickert.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161225.n4GCP3Eo010366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #10 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-16 08:25:02 EDT --- Scratch build went successfully http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1357884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161245.n4GCjT6g005302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #11 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-16 08:45:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344264) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344264) modfiied .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 12:46:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161246.n4GCkgGJ014056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 --- Comment #12 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-16 08:46:40 EDT --- Sorry, previous scratch-build is unbuildable (typo in Requires). The real scratch build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1357946 (src.rpm is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/mcepl/task_1357946/nimbus-0.0.17-4.fc11.src.rpm) and the last spec file has been attached to this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 13:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 09:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161321.n4GDLvOr010956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #60 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-16 09:21:53 EDT --- Tnx for reply Mamoru. (In reply to comment #59) > Well, I have not fully read previous comments, however > for -9: > > * BR (BuildRequires) > - Would you explain why non-devel packages like: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > dbus-qt > qt-sqlite > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > have to be written as BRs explicitly? > There is a problem. qt-sqlite is not available on F10. Because of that(i think cause of that) mumble fails to build at koji. What is the replacement for qt-sqlite on F10? I was searching but found nothing. > * Requires > - Proper Requires(pre) or so are missing: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups > Done. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets > - Would you explain why murmur subpackage does not depend > on mumble main package? You dont need mumble to run murmur. Murmur is for servers and mumble is for clients. > - The directory %{_datadir}/kde4/services/ is owned by kde-filesystem > so it is better that -protocol subpackage should have > "Requires: kde-filesystem". > Done. > * Parallel make > - Support parallel make if possible. If not possible > write some comments about this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make > Done. > * Installation directory > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > install -pD -m0755 release/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/murmurd > ln -s ../sbin/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}-server > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - Why is the same command has to be in two different directories > in the path with different names? Less confusion. After years of mumble nobody told me murmur - everyone says mumble-server. > > - By the way > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > %attr(-,mumble-server,mumble-server) %{_bindir}/mumble-server > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Here %{_bindir}/mumble-server is a symlink and > %attr(.....) on symlink is useless (see man symlink(2)) > ! By the way using %{name} macro is preferred because > you already use it. > Fixed. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > #man pages > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ > install -pD -m0664 man/murmurd.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ > install -pD -m0664 man/mumble* %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - These man pages must be installed under %_mandir/man1, > not under %_mandir (and also see below) > Done. > * Permissions > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > install -pD -m0664 icons/%{name}.16x16.png > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/%{name}.png > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - Usually these files should have 0644 (not 0664) permission > Done. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > install -pD scripts/%{name}.protocol > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/kde4/services/%{name}.protocol > install -pD scripts/murmur.conf > %{buildroot}%{_sysconfdir}/dbus-1/system.d/murmur.conf > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - Due to this these files have executable permission however it > seems these should be with 0644 permision. > Done. > * Inconsistent commands > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > install -d %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/%{name}/ > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - Why do you use both "install -d" and "mkdir -p"? > Fixed. > * Scriptlets > - Scriptlets for GTK cache updating does not match current Fedora > guideline. Please fix this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache > (especially check %postun) > Done. > - Please specify the home directory of mumble-server user > (see the -d option: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UsersAndGroups ) > Currently this is set as "/home/mumble-server" automatically > (on Fedora) > What should set as home directory? It says directory with data but there is none. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > %preun -n murmur > if [$1 = 0]; then > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - This is wrong. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ num=0 > [tasaka1 at localhost ~]$ if [$num = 0] ; then echo "yes" ; fi > -bash: [0: command not found > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > "if [ $1 = 0 ] ; then" is correct > ! Note: here "[" is a built-in "command". > Fixed. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > %post -n murmur > /sbin/chkconfig --add murmur --level a|| : > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > - "--level a" is not needed: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#InitscriptScriptlets Fixed. > > * Duplicate %files entry > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > -%files plugins > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_libdir}/%{name} > %{_libdir}/%{name}/*.so > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > - The %files entry "%{_libdir}/%{name}" means the directory %_libdir/%name > itself and all files/directories/etc under %_libdir/%name. > build.log shows: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > 857 Processing files: mumble-plugins-1.1.8-9.fc11.i586 > 858 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/mumble/liblink.so > ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed. > > * initscript behavior > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > [root at localhost ~]# service murmur start > Starting murmur: [ OK ] > [root at localhost ~]# service murmur stop > Shutting down murmur: [ OK ] > [root at localhost ~]# [ OK ] > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > - killproc() (in %_initrcdir/functions) internally calls > success() or failure so there are duplicate messages when > shutting down murmur daemon. Fixed. As stated above building at koji fails after fixing above problems. Its got to be something related to dependency or sqlite but cant find it. btw on my PC everything builds fine - works as expected. SPEC: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble-1.1.8-10.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 13:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 09:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498736] Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161350.n4GDoQKV015333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 09:50:25 EDT --- Okay, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 13:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 09:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161350.n4GDoZv9024222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 499137 depends on bug 498736, which changed state. Bug 498736 Summary: Review Request: ucommon - Portable C++ runtime for threads and sockets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498736 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 09:50:33 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 15:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161516.n4GFGFQq027743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #2 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-05-16 11:16:15 EDT --- Updated version: Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.2-2.fc10.src.rpm - removed superfluous imake dependency -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 15:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161524.n4GFOqbO005459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-16 11:24:51 EDT --- gvrpcd-1.3-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvrpcd-1.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 15:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161525.n4GFPxb2005841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-16 11:25:58 EDT --- gvrpcd-1.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gvrpcd-1.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 15:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: HTML::CalendarMonthSimple is a Perl module for generating, manipulating, and printing a HTML calendar grid for a specified month. It is intended as a faster and easier-to-use alternative to HTML::CalendarMonth. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 15:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 11:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161530.n4GFUGwE006575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 --- Comment #1 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-16 11:30:16 EDT --- I'm not sure of the license. Upstream says : " This Perl module is freeware. It may be copied, derived, used, and distributed without limitation." (http://search.cpan.org/~stigmata/HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25/CalendarMonthSimple.pm#AUTHORS,_CREDITS,_COPYRIGHTS). I translated that to Public Domain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 16:08:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:08:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161608.n4GG8Fs8002917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 16:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 12:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161651.n4GGpvwA018203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #61 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-16 12:51:55 EDT --- SQLite support is now included in the main qt package because it's used by the new help system in Qt >= 4.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 17:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161721.n4GHLRmp014272@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-16 13:21:25 EDT --- Okay. That seems to fit. This package is APPROVED! I will of course also review your drascula-music package. Regarding the openttd package: grfcodec is now in Fedora. I was preparing for my final exams in school so I was somewhat lacking time. But now I have loads of free time to kill :) That means openttd will be in Fedora pretty soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 17:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161727.n4GHR6w2015031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 --- Comment #5 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-16 13:27:05 EDT --- The following items have been checked and are ok: 1. rpmlint is silent 2. package name complies to guidelines 3. package meets packaging guidelines 4. sha1sums match: [felix at polaris SOURCES]$ sha1sum drascula-audio-1.0.zip* 6618ebe2f08f94836262bc68de6022f9d8f9b081 drascula-audio-1.0.zip 6618ebe2f08f94836262bc68de6022f9d8f9b081 drascula-audio-1.0.zip.orig 5. the spec file is really simple and legible even by my 80-year old grandma 6. the package builds great because it's noarch :-) 7. Requires and BuildReqs are sane 8. file ownership is ok 9. macro usage is reasonable 10. package contains content 11. doesn't own stuff it shouldn't own The following items need to be addressed: 1. Is this really GPLv2+? the readme doesn't state so. Maybe the same mistake as in the drascula-international package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 17:33:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:33:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161733.n4GHXsAR016029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #3 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-16 13:33:53 EDT --- Is this xine-ui.spec taken from RPM Fusion? If it is, then why we must reviewing again something what is reviewed earlier? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 17:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161742.n4GHg39q025997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-16 13:42:03 EDT --- Isn't %{_datadir}/drascula/ unowned? The package has no requirements on something that owns %{_datadir}/drascula/ (in fact it has no requirements at all). I guess "Requires: drascula" is missing, right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 17:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 13:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161749.n4GHnWWl026907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora at christoph-wickert.de | --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-16 13:49:31 EDT --- Sorry for the above comment, was ether a firefox or pebcak error. Searched the spec for "Requires" and FF gave me no results. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 18:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161800.n4GI0wQl020310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 14:00:57 EDT --- Because Fedora and rpmfusion are different... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 18:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161802.n4GI2I74029071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Bug 491519 depends on bug 498744, which changed state. Bug 498744 Summary: Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #17 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-16 14:02:16 EDT --- It builds from source now: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358203 New SPEC: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-opengfx.spec New SRPM: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-opengfx-0-0.3.alpha4.2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 18:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161810.n4GIAvbJ022076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #62 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 14:10:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344291) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344291) Patch to compile on dist-f10-updates-candidate For -10: * BR - BR: qt3-sqlite should not be needed. This uses Qt4, not Qt3. * About mumble-server user directory - Well, -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ is definitely wrong, this directory should be used only when building this package. I would suggest -d %{_localstatedir}/lib/mumble-server/ * Requires - Needed Requires(pre) or so are still missing for murmur subpackage: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * Build failure - The attached patch will make this package compile on F-11/F-10 (F-12 not checked) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358131 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358127 * Devel files in main package ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ln -s %{_libdir}/libmumble.so.%{version} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libmumble.so ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - I guess %_libdir/libmumble.so is not needed. Note that rpmlint warns about this: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- mumble.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmumble.so ---------------------------------------------------------------------- * Service enabled by default ---------------------------------------------------------------------- murmur.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/murmur ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - Installing murmur package enables "murmur" service by default on level 345: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # chkconfig --list murmur murmur 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off ---------------------------------------------------------------------- These should be disabled by default. In murmur init script, # Default-Start: item should have no level. * Init script fix ---------------------------------------------------------------------- diff -uN mumble-1.1.8-9.fc9.src/murmur.init mumble-1.1.8-10.fc10.src/murmur.init --- mumble-1.1.8-9.fc9.src/murmur.init 2009-04-30 01:03:18.000000000 +0900 +++ mumble-1.1.8-10.fc10.src/murmur.init 2009-05-15 08:32:48.000000000 +0900 @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ RETVAL=$? echo if [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]; then - /bin/rm -f "$lockfile" "$pidfile" 2> /dev/null && success || failure + /bin/rm -f "$lockfile" "$pidfile" 2> /dev/null || failure fi } ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - I guess " || failure" can also be removed. * undefined non-weak symbols ---------------------------------------------------------------------- mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 glAttachShader mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 glEnable mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 glTexCoordPointer .... (and so many) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - libmumble.so has undefined non-weak symbols. As this package does not provide -devel subpackage, currently this can be ignored, however it is preferable that this issue is fixed. ! You can also check this issue by $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 > /dev/null This can be fixed by making libmumble.so linked against libGL.so. * Permission ---------------------------------------------------------------------- install -pD -m0664 man/murmurd.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ install -pD -m0664 man/mumble* %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - These should be 0644 permission (In reply to comment #60) > > * Installation directory > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > install -pD -m0755 release/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/murmurd > > ln -s ../sbin/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}-server > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > - Why is the same command has to be in two different directories > > in the path with different names? > Less confusion. After years of mumble nobody told me murmur - everyone says > mumble-server. - Well, What I wonder is that where murmurd is under /usr/sbin, mumble-server is under /usr/bin. Why these directories are different? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 18:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161819.n4GIJm20023115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 14:19:47 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 18:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161824.n4GIO5p3024051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #63 from Thorvald Natvig 2009-05-16 14:24:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > * undefined non-weak symbols > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 > glAttachShader > mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 glEnable > mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 > glTexCoordPointer > .... libmumble.so is an injection library to get the overlay in third-party applications. It can't link (and hence load) libGL on it's own, as this breaks games that provide their own GL wrapper. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 18:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 14:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161841.n4GIfAPr002490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-16 14:41:09 EDT --- For -8: * Desktop file - Remove "Application" category. This category is marked as deprecated. ref: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html * desktop-file-install - Again "--remove-original" is not needed for this case. ?? About aaxine - Well, currently launching aaxine on CUI (with framebuffer, vga=791) by $ aaxine just displays nothing and only sound can be heard. Also with GUI launching aaxine on terminal emulator (such as gnome-terminal) launching another Window and show some AA images there, not on the terminal emulator. Is this the expected behavior? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 19:20:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:20:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161920.n4GJKQW8032580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-16 15:20:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > For -8: > > * Desktop file > - Remove "Application" category. This category is marked as > deprecated. ref: > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html Removed. > * desktop-file-install > - Again "--remove-original" is not needed for this case. Sorry, didn't see it since it was on the same line as desktop-install :) Removed. > ?? About aaxine > - Well, currently launching aaxine on CUI (with framebuffer, vga=791) > by $ aaxine > just displays nothing and only sound can be heard. > Also with GUI launching aaxine on terminal emulator (such as > gnome-terminal) launching another Window and show some AA images > there, not on the terminal emulator. > Is this the expected behavior? After toying around for some time I found out that aalib output requires support from xine-lib. This is in the xine-lib-extras package, which I have now added as a Requires: and aaxine works. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xine-ui.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xine-ui-0.99.5-9.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 19:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161941.n4GJfCw8011728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #8 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-16 15:41:11 EDT --- Im getting this issue when pressing DVD or DVB navigator buttons: cannot find input plugin for MRL [dvd:/] input plugin cannot open MRL [dvd:/] but I did not try the latest buid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 19:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 15:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905161950.n4GJoeir013296@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #9 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-16 15:50:39 EDT --- Is this OK (at config time)? checking for NVTVSIMPLE... *** nvtvsimple support will be disabled *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 20:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162013.n4GKD62M008745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-16 16:13:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Im getting this issue when pressing DVD or DVB navigator buttons: > > cannot find input plugin for MRL [dvd:/] > input plugin cannot open MRL [dvd:/] > > but I did not try the latest buid. For dvb you need to have a working channels.conf in your ~/.xine directory. For dvd you must have a dvd in your drive. Otherwise you get these errors. Stupid, yes. A packaging bug, no. (In reply to comment #9) > Is this OK (at config time)? > > checking for NVTVSIMPLE... *** nvtvsimple support will be disabled *** Yes, since there's been no support in rpmfusion either and xine works without it. NVTV is for enabling TV-out on Nvidia cards. nvtv upstream is here: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=33758 nvtvsimple has been updated last in 2004 (nvtv-runtime in 2006), so I don't think it's an important addition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 20:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] New: Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Summary: Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, tcallawa at redhat.com, kevin at tummy.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, scheck at etes.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks-1.15-1.src.rpm Description: The drbdlinks program manages links into a DRBD partition which is shared among several machines. A simple configuration file, "/etc/drbdlinks.conf", specifies the links. This can be used to manage e.g. links for /etc/httpd, /var/lib/pgsql and other system directories that need to appear as if they are local to the system when running applications after the drbd shared partition has been mounted. When running drbdlinks with "start" as the mode, drbdlinks will rename the existing files/directories and then make symbolic links into the DRBD partition, "stop" does the reverse. By default, rename appends ".drbdlinks" to the name, but this can be overridden. An init script is included which runs "stop" before heartbeat starts, and after heartbeat stops. This is done to try to ensure that when the shared partition isn't mounted, the links are in their normal state. The drbdlinks upstream package ships a GPLv2 file, but nowhere a licensing is mentioned. According to what I know, Tom is treating such a behaviour normally as GPL+ in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 20:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 16:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162025.n4GKPVRH019137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #11 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-16 16:25:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > Stupid, yes. A packaging bug, no. > > > nvtvsimple has been updated last in 2004 (nvtv-runtime in 2006), so I don't > think it's an important addition. OK than. Now it's clear to me, thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 21:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 17:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162126.n4GLQEgv022046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #30 from jebba 2009-05-16 17:26:11 EDT --- Heh. I just got a flood of messages since my email addr just came back online, one of which was about this bug.... I took a "break" in November 2008 and it got turned into a much longer break when my computers were stolen from my house. Gar. I am back online again, but I am not used Fedora or its derivatives (), so Henrique feel free to take over! Oh, and the files referenced above, if needed, can be had (for a limited time only) at: ftp://216.17.145.32/pub/BLAG/developers/jebba/jebbadora/ Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 21:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 17:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] New: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, scheck at etes.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-mongrel_cluster.spec SRPM URL: \ http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-1.src.rpm Description: Mongrel_cluster is a GemPlugin that wrappers the mongrel HTTP server and simplifies the deployment of webapps using a cluster of mongrel servers. Mongrel_cluster will conveniently configure and control several mongrel servers or groups of mongrel servers, which are then load balanced using a reverse proxy solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 21:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 17:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480607] Review Request: bluecove - Implementation of JSR-82 Java Bluetooth API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162142.n4GLgXDF032601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480607 --- Comment #4 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-05-16 17:42:31 EDT --- Update to latest snapshot, and moved to fedorapeople hosting. Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/bluecove/bluecove.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/bluecove/bluecove-2.1.1-0.20090505.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 23:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162338.n4GNcqGR016964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-16 19:38:50 EDT --- First off, README.fedora still talks about some module called InputBox which doesn't seem related to RenameUser. Could you fix that up? Now, we can trust a license indicated on an upstream web site as long as we reasonably believe that the authors of the software in question were the ones who made the indication of the license on that site. However, in this case, according to the wiki history it's it's you who've made the indication that it's GPLv2+. So, besides fixing the README.fedora file, I see two options which will allow me to approve this: 1) Spot acks what's being done. I've blocked FE-Legal to request his input. 2) You include in this package the relevant parts of the email conversations with the authors that you indicated you've had on the upstream wiki page. Sorry, licensing sucks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 23:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162347.n4GNlYEh018595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-16 19:47:33 EDT --- OK, I found some time. Unfortunately the package in comment #17 does not build for me in current F11. I get a bunch of bizarre errors with libtool such as: ./libtool: line 793: X--tag=CC: command not found ./libtool: line 826: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found which cascade into: ./libtool: line 1103: X.deps/libirman_la-chunk.Tpo: No such file or directory ./libtool: line 1103: X-c: command not found ./libtool: line 1154: Xlibirman_la-chunk.lo: command not found ./libtool: line 1159: libtool: compile: cannot determine name of library object from `': command not found To rule out problems with my local mock setup, I did a koji build which failed as well: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358328 It does build in F10, though. Can you work out what's broken in F11, or would you like me to review an F10 build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 16 23:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 19:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905162352.n4GNqcLu011719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-16 19:52:35 EDT --- OK, this does build on F11, rpmlint is clean, the versioning is proper and %description looks OK to me. However, you still have the conditional %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 which will always be satisfied. Is there some reason you can't remove that? It will not help your epel builds, because %fedora is never defined there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 00:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 20:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170009.n4H094cu014075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-16 20:09:03 EDT --- Unfortunately I completely ran out of time to do any reviewing for some time. Getting back to this, I see that the only real issues I had with this past comment #13 were in actually getting it working (which cleared up with selinux turned off). I've been running it on a couple of test servers, and while I haven't really tested it under failure conditions it at least seems to work OK. Can you simply add a note in %description or in a README.Fedora file or something which warns people not to try this with selinux? There's no hard requirement that selinux be supported before a package is imported, though with something that has the potential to lock people out of their machines I really think it's worth making a prominent warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 00:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 20:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170029.n4H0T6DH024543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-16 20:29:03 EDT --- This one fails to build for me in current F11; I get a bunch of errors like: ./zmq/atomic_ptr.hpp:114:6: error: #elif with no expression ./zmq/atomic_ptr.hpp:154:6: error: #elif with no expression in several different files. A failing scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358350 An F10 build succeeds. I can review it if you can't figure out what's breaking on F11, but it seems pointless to import a package that won't build on our new release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 00:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 20:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170051.n4H0pwPd020296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tcallawa at redhat.com | --- Comment #1 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-16 20:51:57 EDT --- Upstream clarified licensing to GPLv2-only with the 1.16 release now: Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks-1.16-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 01:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 21:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170136.n4H1aHKx026592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 --- Comment #3 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-16 21:36:16 EDT --- C# bug reported: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-509 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 04:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 00:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170403.n4H43EcA022926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #9 from David Nalley 2009-05-17 00:03:12 EDT --- Several of your install commands don't use -p and thus don't preserve timestamps. Additionally, your cp commands don't consistently use the same parameters, and while technically correct, may be something you want to look out, though it's certainly not a blocker, more of a style issue if anything. Why are you deleting the man page? You just copied the file there just a few lines earlier [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./ampache.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/ampache-3.5-8.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ampache-3.5-8.fc10.noarch.rpm ampache.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh 0644 ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ampache apache ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ampache.cfg apache ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ampache.cfg 0640 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. The modules directory contains a lot of 3rd party packages, such as getid3 from http://getid3.sourceforge.net/ and pear xml rpc from http://pear.php.net/package/XML_RPC There appear to be plenty of these. Unfortunately the packaging guidelines don't permit including other software packages within a single package. Unfortunately this is a common problem with web applications since much of their target audience is shared hosting where the user doesn't have control over the host. If these already exist in fedora you can get either symlink or modify the source to look elsewhere. If they don't you'll need to get those packaged as well and symlink or modify source to point to them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 04:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 00:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170429.n4H4TsmP019287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 --- Comment #16 from Robin Norwood 2009-05-17 00:29:52 EDT --- Sorry, one more: rpmlint points out that the -rpath issue is present here. Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath The suggested method using sed to strip out the hardcoded paths seems to work for me at first glance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 07:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 03:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170701.n4H71U2Q014952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #22 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-05-17 03:01:29 EDT --- %changelog * Sun May 17 2009 J?n ONDREJ (SAL) - 0.4.5-3 - added libtoolize to fix build for f11 Builds for f11 now. http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SPECS/libirman.spec http://www.salstar.sk/pub/fedora/SRPMS/10/libirman-0.4.5-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 08:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 04:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170817.n4H8HBO7025506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 04:17:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Okay. That seems to fit. > > This package is APPROVED! > Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drascula-international Short Description: Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 08:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 04:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480056] Review Request: libchamplain-gtk - Gtk+ widget wrapper for libchamplain In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170826.n4H8QKfx028467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480056 --- Comment #6 from Denis Leroy 2009-05-17 04:26:19 EDT --- Hi Debarshi, Sorry for the delay. Let's get it over with, can you post updates to your spec and srpm ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 08:37:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 04:37:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170837.n4H8bHxl029887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 04:37:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 08:51:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 04:51:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170851.n4H8p29N031713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 04:51:01 EDT --- I've contacted chemical-mime upstream to ask them to add the missing types. In the mean time, I've included them into this package. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/viewmol.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/viewmol-2.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 09:05:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 05:05:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170905.n4H95llC027063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-17 05:05:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Done. I'll post the new spec after you have reviewed other stuff as well. What other stuff are you referring to? Anwthing else than bug # 498246? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 09:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 05:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170914.n4H9E8xT002560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-17 05:14:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > ?? About aaxine > - Well, currently launching aaxine on CUI (with framebuffer, vga=791) > by $ aaxine ! Well, I found that aaxine accepts the option used by aalib as shown in src/aaui/main.c: --------------------------------------------------------- 638 #ifdef AA 639 /* 640 * AALib help and option-parsing 641 */ 642 if (!aa_parseoptions(NULL, NULL, &argc, argv)) { 643 print_usage(); 644 goto failure; 645 } 646 #endif --------------------------------------------------------- Then: (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > For -8: > > > > * Desktop file > > - Remove "Application" category. This category is marked as > > deprecated. ref: > > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-October/msg00723.html > > Removed. - You can use "--remove-category" option of "desktop-file-install" (as you are already using --add-category) instead of using sed. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (xine-ui) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 09:41:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 05:41:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170941.n4H9fFUf006996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 05:41:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > > > Done. I'll post the new spec after you have reviewed other stuff as well. > > What other stuff are you referring to? Anwthing else than bug # 498246? No, I was thinking that I'd belay posting a new spec until you have done the review, then I could have fixed everything at once. However I've now posted a new spec&srpm which update the desktop database (and add the mime types as well). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 09:43:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 05:43:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170943.n4H9hcaC007267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 05:43:37 EDT --- True. Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xine-ui Short Description: A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 09:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 05:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170951.n4H9pFZH001781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 05:51:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > The following items need to be addressed: > 1. Is this really GPLv2+? the readme doesn't state so. Maybe the same mistake > as in the drascula-international package? Ack, same mistake as drascula-international package, should have checked that while I was at it, sorry. Here is a new version with this fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-music.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/drascula-music-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 09:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 05:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905170958.n4H9wIJK009850@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 05:58:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > It builds from source now: > Great! > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358203 > > New SPEC: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-opengfx.spec > New SRPM: > http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-opengfx-0-0.3.alpha4.2.fc11.src.rpm Full review done: Approved ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171007.n4HA7VSI004397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171007.n4HA75PY011417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 06:07:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Few notes about the package: > > - We must patch it to hide country flags from network server list > I've asked them to replace them in graphics, but there is no guarantee that > they will do it: > https://secure.openttd.org/bugs/task/2771 > Hmm, you write there: "The reason behind this report is Fedora's policy of handling flags. They must be split (or removed completely) to a subpackage that is not installed by default. This was caused by some political case." Is this actual policy (as in written down somewhere and approved by Fesco) ? or just something which was decided adhoc somewhere ? > - Please update it to 0.7.0-RC2. > Ack. > - Would be good to generate AI docs from src/ai/api/Doxyfile and put them to > subpackage. > This IMHO makes no sense, this is an internal API, which is not exported so no need to buid or include the docs. > - Macros issue in opengfx package is not addressed. ?? As promised I will review this, but it looks like we first need to address the flags issue , assigning to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171013.n4HADJF7012356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #19 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-17 06:13:18 EDT --- I'm suggesting to add %check that does checking that md5 sums in *.obg are correspondent to ones that were built by grfcodec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171019.n4HAJ0su013420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #21 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-17 06:18:59 EDT --- Okay. I'll try implementing that and then put a new spec online before requesting CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171016.n4HAGQwe013082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 06:16:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I'm suggesting to add %check that does checking that md5 sums in *.obg are > correspondent to ones that were built by grfcodec. That sounds like a good plan, yes, esp. wrt network play, Felix ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171018.n4HAIu2q013357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-17 06:18:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > As promised I will review this, but it looks like we first need to address > the flags issue , assigning to me. I'm thinking, that we can just hide language column with flags. If such solution would be acceptable, I can come with a patch for it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171016.n4HAGIeA013019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-17 06:16:17 EDT --- Great! This package is APPROVED then as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171016.n4HAGY8T013139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-17 06:16:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Hmm, you write there: > "The reason behind this report is Fedora's policy of handling flags. They must > be split (or removed completely) to a subpackage that is not installed by > default. This was caused by some political case." > > Is this actual policy (as in written down somewhere and approved by Fesco) ? > or just something which was decided adhoc somewhere ? The policy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Flags was approved on one of FESCo meetings as per https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/110 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171024.n4HAO7e5014375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #9 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 06:24:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Hmm, you write there: > > "The reason behind this report is Fedora's policy of handling flags. They must > > be split (or removed completely) to a subpackage that is not installed by > > default. This was caused by some political case." > > > > Is this actual policy (as in written down somewhere and approved by Fesco) ? > > or just something which was decided adhoc somewhere ? > > The policy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TomCallaway/Flags was approved on one > of FESCo meetings as per https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/110 Ah I wasn't aware of this policy, glad I mist the flame fest one that one :) (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > As promised I will review this, but it looks like we first need to address > > the flags issue , assigning to me. > > I'm thinking, that we can just hide language column with flags. If such > solution would be acceptable, I can come with a patch for it. Would there then still be a way for the user to find out the server language from the pick a server UI ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 10:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 06:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171034.n4HAYQNX015864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #10 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-17 06:34:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > - Would be good to generate AI docs from src/ai/api/Doxyfile and put them to > > subpackage. > > > > This IMHO makes no sense, this is an internal API, which is not exported > so no need to buid or include the docs. This is only script "external" API that is used by squirrel AI scripts. And it could be used by AI writers as scripts are easily added as plugins. > > - Macros issue in opengfx package is not addressed. Macro usage is not consistent there - it is mixing "rm" and %{__rm} there for instance. I think, all macros like %{__rm} should be replaced in favour of simple commands. (In reply to comment #9) > Ah I wasn't aware of this policy, glad I mist the flame fest one that one :) Hehe. > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #6) > > > As promised I will review this, but it looks like we first need to address > > > the flags issue , assigning to me. > > > > I'm thinking, that we can just hide language column with flags. If such > > solution would be acceptable, I can come with a patch for it. > > Would there then still be a way for the user to find out the server language > from the pick a server UI ? Yes, when user clicks on individual server line, server language will be shown on server details panel. But in such, there won't be simple way to fast search for particular language - user will have to click on each server if he wants to find server where is that particular language spoken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 11:02:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:02:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171102.n4HB2Ns5020457@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #11 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-17 07:02:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > > - Macros issue in opengfx package is not addressed. > > Macro usage is not consistent there - it is mixing "rm" and %{__rm} there for > instance. I think, all macros like %{__rm} should be replaced in favour of > simple commands. Oh, that was fixed in new srpms. I was looking at old spec link. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 11:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499394] Review Request: ampache - web based audio/video streaming application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171103.n4HB3Ehk020589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499394 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-17 07:03:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Several of your install commands don't use -p and thus don't preserve > timestamps. This can be done, but the files being installed are my own source. > > Additionally, your cp commands don't consistently use the same parameters, and > while technically correct, may be something you want to look out, though it's > certainly not a blocker, more of a style issue if anything. I used cp -a, which according to the manual, is the same as -cdpR > > Why are you deleting the man page? You just copied the file there just a few > lines earlier > The man page would go to the doc directory (/usr/share/doc/ampache). I just installed it in the appropriate place, /usr/share/man/man1/, and removed it to avoid the same file being in two different places. Furthermore, if I kept a copy in the doc dir, rpmlint would complain it is not compressed. > [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./ampache.spec > 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/ampache-3.5-8.fc10.src.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/ampache-3.5-8.fc10.noarch.rpm > ampache.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/ampache/locale/base/gather-messages.sh 0644 > ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ampache apache > ampache.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/ampache.cfg apache > ampache.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/ampache.cfg 0640 > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. > > > > The modules directory contains a lot of 3rd party packages, such as getid3 from > http://getid3.sourceforge.net/ and pear xml rpc from > http://pear.php.net/package/XML_RPC > There appear to be plenty of these. Unfortunately the packaging guidelines > don't permit including other software packages within a single package. > Unfortunately this is a common problem with web applications since much of > their target audience is shared hosting where the user doesn't have control > over the host. If these already exist in fedora you can get either symlink or > modify the source to look elsewhere. If they don't you'll need to get those > packaged as well and symlink or modify source to point to them. I saw a similar issue with gallery2, which released a new version symlinked to php-Smarty. Well, I did not find getid3 in Fedora, and probably several of the others are not also. But to pack and review all of them should take ages to complete ... I am keeping ampache in ATrpms, and I have already incorporated almost all of your suggestions in the current release (I will just move the server root to /usr/share in the next release). Eventually, these applications will be packed (I can do some of them), and we can return to this review in the future. Thanks anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 11:29:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:29:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171129.n4HBTWF6017297@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #22 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-17 07:29:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > But after discussion about the requirement for a -devel package with the > rabbitmq development team, we are reluctant to split the package in this way. > While the rabbitmq server can run without the .hrl files, they have uses that > are not restricted to development activities: They are useful to allow > interaction with the server at the erlang command line, for administration and > monitoring. So we don't believe that they fall into the same category as the > header files of a library, as described in the "Devel packages" section of the > packaging guidelines. The problem is that we (I mean people, who interested in getting more erlang software into Fedora/EPEL) still haven't a rules/policy for packaging erlang applications and libraries. Among (still very few) erlang-related packages in Fedora/EPEL, some packaged splitted into main and *-devel subpackage, while others - not (erlang itself). After some thinking about this issue, I finally agreed with you - we should bundle hrl-files with main package, and this mine request should be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 11:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171147.n4HBlKLe027880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 07:47:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #6) > > > - Would be good to generate AI docs from src/ai/api/Doxyfile and put them to > > > subpackage. > > > > > > > This IMHO makes no sense, this is an internal API, which is not exported > > so no need to buid or include the docs. > > This is only script "external" API that is used by squirrel AI scripts. And it > could be used by AI writers as scripts are easily added as plugins. > Ah, ok then indeed it would be good to package this in a sub-package. > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > (In reply to comment #6) > > > > As promised I will review this, but it looks like we first need to address > > > > the flags issue , assigning to me. > > > > > > I'm thinking, that we can just hide language column with flags. If such > > > solution would be acceptable, I can come with a patch for it. > > > > Would there then still be a way for the user to find out the server language > > from the pick a server UI ? > > Yes, when user clicks on individual server line, server language will be shown > on server details panel. But in such, there won't be simple way to fast search > for particular language - user will have to click on each server if he wants to > find server where is that particular language spoken. Hmm, not ideal but I guess just hiding the flags column in the UI is an ok solution then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 11:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171150.n4HBoTH6028403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-17 07:50:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drascula-music Short Description: Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 11:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 07:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171156.n4HBu5kV021811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #13 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-17 07:56:04 EDT --- Okay. Here's something to play with: 0.7.1-RC1 I added the docs tarball from upstream and put it in the package as a docs subpackage. It should contain everything that is needed to develop OTTD addons such as AI etc. SPEC: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd.spec SRPM: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-0.7.1-0.1.rc1.fc11.src.rpm Alexey, if you had a patch for the flag issue that would be awesome. BTW: I updated the opengfx spec to match the one that is in the srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 12:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171210.n4HCAo55031774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(alexl at users.sourc | |eforge.net) --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-17 08:10:45 EDT --- Alex, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 12:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171218.n4HCIsUw025269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #64 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-17 08:18:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #62) > Created an attachment (id=344291) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344291) [details] > Patch to compile on dist-f10-updates-candidate > > For -10: > > * BR > - BR: qt3-sqlite should not be needed. This uses Qt4, not > Qt3. I uploaded wrong spec file. It was already removed at the time you wrote this. > > * About mumble-server user directory > - Well, -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ is definitely wrong, > this directory should be used only when building this package. > I would suggest -d %{_localstatedir}/lib/mumble-server/ > Done. > * Requires > - Needed Requires(pre) or so are still missing for murmur subpackage: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets > Done. > * Build failure > - The attached patch will make this package compile on > F-11/F-10 (F-12 not checked) > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358131 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358127 > Included. > * Devel files in main package > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ln -s %{_libdir}/libmumble.so.%{version} %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libmumble.so > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - I guess %_libdir/libmumble.so is not needed. It is needed. Mumble will complain loudly if it cant find libmumble.so. Thorvald said this few post back. > Note that rpmlint warns about this: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > mumble.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libmumble.so > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > * Service enabled by default > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > murmur.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/murmur > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - Installing murmur package enables "murmur" service by default > on level 345: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > # chkconfig --list murmur > murmur 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:on 4:on 5:on 6:off > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > These should be disabled by default. > In murmur init script, # Default-Start: item should have no > level. Fixed. > > * Init script fix > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > diff -uN mumble-1.1.8-9.fc9.src/murmur.init > mumble-1.1.8-10.fc10.src/murmur.init > --- mumble-1.1.8-9.fc9.src/murmur.init 2009-04-30 01:03:18.000000000 +0900 > +++ mumble-1.1.8-10.fc10.src/murmur.init 2009-05-15 08:32:48.000000000 > +0900 > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ > RETVAL=$? > echo > if [ $RETVAL -eq 0 ]; then > - /bin/rm -f "$lockfile" "$pidfile" 2> /dev/null && success || > failure > + /bin/rm -f "$lockfile" "$pidfile" 2> /dev/null || failure > fi > } > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - I guess " || failure" can also be removed. > This was already changed at the time you wrote this. I accidently uploaded wrong spec and srpm. > * undefined non-weak symbols > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 > glAttachShader > mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 glEnable > mumble.i586: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1.1.8 > glTexCoordPointer > .... > (and so many) > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - libmumble.so has undefined non-weak symbols. As > this package does not provide -devel subpackage, currently this > can be ignored, however it is preferable that this issue > is fixed. > ! You can also check this issue by > $ ldd -r /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 > /dev/null > This can be fixed by making libmumble.so linked against libGL.so. > Thorvald answered this. I'm leaving this as is. > * Permission > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > install -pD -m0664 man/murmurd.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ > install -pD -m0664 man/mumble* %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > - These should be 0644 permission > Again, wrong spec file. :( > (In reply to comment #60) > > > * Installation directory > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > install -pD -m0755 release/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/murmurd > > > ln -s ../sbin/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name}-server > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > - Why is the same command has to be in two different directories > > > in the path with different names? > > Less confusion. After years of mumble nobody told me murmur - everyone says > > mumble-server. > - Well, What I wonder is that where murmurd is under /usr/sbin, > mumble-server is under /usr/bin. Why these directories are different? I moved symlink to sbin dir. SPEC: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble-1.1.8-11.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 12:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171237.n4HCbKmm028408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #12 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-17 08:37:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > OK, this does build on F11, rpmlint is clean, the versioning is proper and > %description looks OK to me. However, you still have the conditional > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 8 > which will always be satisfied. Is there some reason you can't remove that? > It will not help your epel builds, because %fedora is never defined there. I just revised this spec-file and found that the requirement for python-setuptools is superfluous - I removed it (along with pkgconfig - another leftover) Koji scratch builds for F-11 and EL-5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358724 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358726 http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 12:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171236.n4HCaOfC028250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Jonathan Underwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jonathan.underwood at gmail.co | |m --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-05-17 08:36:22 EDT --- On F-10, after installation of peppy-0.9.27-3.fc10.noarch $ peppy Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/peppy", line 13, in import peppy.main File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/main.py", line 10, in import wx ImportError: No module named wx This is due to a missing Requires: wxPython Jussi: when doing a review, it's always worth installing a package into a chroot to see if it runs properly and pulls in all the correct packages and no more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 12:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 08:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171238.n4HCcmDv003815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-05-17 08:38:47 EDT --- Also, there's a newer upstream version peppy-0.9.86.tar.bz2 - it'd be nice to update the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 13:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 09:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171307.n4HD7qGT000862@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 09:07:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Also, there's a newer upstream version peppy-0.9.86.tar.bz2 - it'd be nice to > update the package. $ HEAD http://peppy.flipturn.org/archive/peppy-0.9.86.tar.bz2 reports Last-Modified: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:19:31 GMT so the new version has been released only a couple of days ago. (In reply to comment #18) > On F-10, after installation of peppy-0.9.27-3.fc10.noarch > > $ peppy > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/peppy", line 13, in > import peppy.main > File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/main.py", line 10, in > import wx > ImportError: No module named wx > > This is due to a missing Requires: wxPython ?? peppy-0.9.27-3 already Requires: wxPython. For me it works fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 13:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 09:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171317.n4HDHdnZ002518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #14 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-17 09:17:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I added the docs tarball from upstream and put it in the package as a docs > subpackage. It should contain everything that is needed to develop OTTD addons > such as AI etc. Seems, docs tarball they distribute is documentation for whole internal API. And we want only docs for AI API. It is simple to generate, just call doxygen from src/ai/api dir (doxygen should be in BR). > Alexey, if you had a patch for the flag issue that would be awesome. The simplest patch I used is just hiding flag: http://atorkhov.fedorapeople.org/openttd-0.7.0-hide-flag.patch The idea of representing languages by two-letter ISO codes does not work well is this case - they have Brazilian and Portuguese languages/flags but it will be represented by "pt" code. It should be either long code pt_BR/pt_PT which is not very good for users, or some shortening of full language name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 13:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 09:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171321.n4HDL5pf010725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-05-17 09:21:04 EDT --- # yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install peppy Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, refresh-packagekit Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * updates-testing: ftp.esat.net * rpmfusion-nonfree-updates: fr2.rpmfind.net * fedora: ftp.esat.net * rpmfusion-free-updates: fr2.rpmfind.net * rpmfusion-free: fr2.rpmfind.net * updates: ftp.esat.net * rpmfusion-nonfree: fr2.rpmfind.net updates-testing | 3.0 kB 00:00 updates-testing/primary_db | 510 kB 00:01 Setting up Install Process Parsing package install arguments Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package peppy.noarch 0:0.9.27-3.fc10 set to be updated --> Processing Dependency: python-enchant for package: peppy --> Running transaction check ---> Package python-enchant.x86_64 0:1.3.1-2.fc9 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Installing: peppy noarch 0.9.27-3.fc10 updates-testing 1.8 M Installing for dependencies: python-enchant x86_64 1.3.1-2.fc9 fedora 107 k Transaction Summary ================================================================================ Install 2 Package(s) Update 0 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 1.9 M Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: (1/2): python-enchant-1.3.1-2.fc9.x86_64.rpm | 107 kB 00:00 (2/2): peppy-0.9.27-3.fc10.noarch.rpm | 1.8 MB 00:02 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 655 kB/s | 1.9 MB 00:02 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing : python-enchant 1/2 Installing : peppy 2/2 Installed: peppy.noarch 0:0.9.27-3.fc10 Dependency Installed: python-enchant.x86_64 0:1.3.1-2.fc9 Complete! [root at m1210 jgu]# exit exit [jgu at m1210 ~]$ [jgu at m1210 ~]$ [jgu at m1210 ~]$ peppy Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/peppy", line 13, in import peppy.main File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/peppy/main.py", line 10, in import wx ImportError: No module named wx So, for whatever reason, it doesn't pull in wxPython. $ rpm -q --requires peppy /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 python-enchant rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 13:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 09:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171331.n4HDVOKY012198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #22 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-05-17 09:31:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #19) > > Also, there's a newer upstream version peppy-0.9.86.tar.bz2 - it'd be nice to > > update the package. > > $ HEAD http://peppy.flipturn.org/archive/peppy-0.9.86.tar.bz2 > reports > Last-Modified: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:19:31 GMT > > so the new version has been released only a couple of days ago. > Yes, sure, was only mentioning it in passing for information, wasn't a criticism. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 13:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 09:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171336.n4HDa2uw012943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #20 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-17 09:36:01 EDT --- Now, xine-ui going to Fedora, so I prepared me-tv to use xine-ui. http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/me-tv.spec http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/me-tv-0.8.12-3.fc10.src.rpm Please, take a look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 14:01:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:01:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171401.n4HE1Dwx009254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-17 10:01:13 EDT --- peppy-0.9.86-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/peppy-0.9.86-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 14:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171406.n4HE6Nia010062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-17 10:06:22 EDT --- peppy-0.9.86-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/peppy-0.9.86-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 14:40:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171440.n4HEeZ5h015518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #22 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-17 10:40:32 EDT --- I'll try to find why it's failed to build in F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 14:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171452.n4HEqKO8024695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 10:52:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > So, for whatever reason, it doesn't pull in wxPython. > > $ rpm -q --requires peppy > /usr/bin/env > /usr/bin/python > python(abi) = 2.5 > python-enchant > rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 > rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 True. This is quite odd. Anyway, the rpm of the new version requires wxPython, so it should work as expected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 14:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 10:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171452.n4HEqDxi024668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Alex Lancaster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(alexl at users.sourc | |eforge.net) | --- Comment #46 from Alex Lancaster 2009-05-17 10:52:12 EDT --- koji scratch build for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358794 -static subpackage now appears to pass rpmlint tests: $ rpmlint eclib-20080310-7.p7.fc11.i586.rpm eclib-devel-20080310-7.p7.fc11.i586.rpm eclib-static-20080310-7.p7.fc11.i586.rpm eclib.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/librankntl.so.20080310 exit at GLIBC_2.0 eclib-devel.i586: W: no-documentation eclib-static.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. So, marking this as APPROVED. (The rawhide/F-12 fails to build because of issues with the dependent packages like pari-devel not yet being rebuilt: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1358789 this will probably go away soon, and shouldn't hold up building the package, even if only for F-11/F-10 initially). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 16:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171615.n4HGFqxe030260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #47 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-17 12:15:49 EDT --- No, ntl in devel now builds a shared lib and no ntl-static anymore: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=98367 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 16:42:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 12:42:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171642.n4HGgCXp008950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-17 12:42:10 EDT --- Hey Jochen: What blockers for approval remain? Let me know and I will try and get them fixed up. Thanks again for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 17:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 13:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171746.n4HHkNON018421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Underwood 2009-05-17 13:46:22 EDT --- Can confirm that packages fixes the Reequires: # rpm -Uvh peppy-0.9.86-1.fc10.noarch.rpm Preparing... ########################################### [100%] 1:peppy ########################################### [100%] [root at m1210 ~]# rpm -q --requires peppy /usr/bin/env /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.5 python-enchant rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 wxPython Thanks much. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 18:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171810.n4HIAGYx014374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-17 14:10:14 EDT --- The blocker is the issue reported on comment #12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 18:38:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:38:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171838.n4HIcmqs026541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz --- Comment #15 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-17 14:38:47 EDT --- Jochen, the problem described in comment #12 is really not related to packaging (I wouldn't even call it a bug, if you have a cli for NM and you don't run NM, it is obvious that you get an error "NM is not running":), please don't delay the review because of this -- thank you very much in advance...! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 18:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171843.n4HIhEKw027377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-17 14:43:13 EDT --- OK, I will APPROVE your package. But in may be nice, if you can create a new release of the application which show a better error message in this case bacause the error message which I have got is not very helpful for an user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 18:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 14:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171846.n4HIkZG6028042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 --- Comment #34 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-17 14:46:32 EDT --- I have build the -22 release for F-11 and F-10. It will be nice, if you can bundeled it which your update request. At least I want to offer you the co-maintainership for blender if you want. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 19:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171901.n4HJ16WX022099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 19:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171919.n4HJJO5E024736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-05-17 15:19:23 EDT --- BTW, to anyone declaring intent to review, there is a new version upstream, ping here to let me know to upload the latest upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 19:31:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:31:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171931.n4HJVrSo027114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 15:31:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344353) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344353) Patch to fix desktop file install and rpmlint warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 19:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171935.n4HJZ0YD027379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|than at redhat.com |karsten at redhat.com, | |tsmetana at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-17 15:34:59 EDT --- Apply the patch above to devel branch and make build; then I'll do a full review. Also, please fix the source URL: prdownloads.sourceforge.net should be downloads.sourceforge.net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 19:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 15:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490354] Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905171933.n4HJXcY1027285@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-17 15:33:36 EDT --- Good: + Package name matches naming guildlines + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install * Specification of the Buildroot is ok. Bad: - Basename of the SPEC file doesn't machtes package name - URL doesn't shows on proper project homepage - Source doesn't contains full qualified URL - Please change BuildArchitecures into BuildArch: - Source are not in separe el subpackage (/Packaging/Emacs#Packaging_of_source_elisp_files) - Specification of the installation destination on fullfill Emace Packaging guulldline (/Packaging/Emacs#GNU_Emacs) - Package doesn't contains correct Changelog you have to specified version-release on it Your package seems to need a lot of love. I want to suggest that you should read the packaging guildlines and the guildlines for emacs packages carefully. If you can demonstrate in your next approach, that you have understand this guildlines, I may be willing to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 20:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 16:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905172007.n4HK7RHr032624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-17 16:07:26 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name. + Name of the package fullfill naming guildines. + Package has proper RPM-group + URL tag show on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent release of the software + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: c11b38dfa60d8d07b55746a957b48b19 ) * Package contains valid License tag + License tag state GPLv2 as an valid OSS license + Header of the source file has GPLv2 license note + Package has verbatin copy of the license text + Package has proper defintion of the Buildroot + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Package contains proper Changelog + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quiete on source rpm + Koji build works fine. Bad: - Initscripts should be install on %{_initrddir} (Unproper usage of rpm macros) - don't put a file on %{_localstatedir}/run. you should only create a directory on it - Who should owned %{_sysconfdir}/ha.d ? - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: $ rpmlint drbdlinks-1.16-1.fc10.noarch.rpm drbdlinks.noarch: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbdlinksclean drbdlinks.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbdlinksclean drbdlinks.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name drbdlinksclean 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 17 20:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 16:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905172017.n4HKHC4F009952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-17 16:17:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - Initscripts should be install on %{_initrddir} > (Unproper usage of rpm macros) I want to package drbdlinks for all active branches and this is only possible without macro usage currently, look for %{_initrddir} vs. %{_initdir} or so. > - don't put a file on %{_localstatedir}/run. > you should only create a directory on it Upstream initscript doesn't do that as well. And drbdlinks isn't a daemon. It also can be triggered by heartbeat. Thus /var/run doesn't make sense. > - Who should owned %{_sysconfdir}/ha.d ? Heartbeat owns that directory. But heartbeat is optional, drbdlinks can be used with and without. > drbdlinks.noarch: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in > /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbdlinksclean If no Default-Start, no Default-Stop. The line has not to exist, if it is not filled, IIRC. > drbdlinks.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/drbdlinksclean > drbdlinks.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name drbdlinksclean As explained above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 01:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180122.n4I1M71P016097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 21:22:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: maven-wagon Short Description: Tools to manage artifacts and deployment Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 01:26:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:26:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180126.n4I1QsL8016781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 --- Comment #9 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 21:26:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: saxpath Short Description: Simple API for XPath Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 01:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180124.n4I1OLWE016233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 21:24:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: aqute-bndlib Short Description: BND Library Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 01:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180137.n4I1bK3h027338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 --- Comment #3 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 21:37:19 EDT --- Oops! InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 01:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180139.n4I1d0wD027513@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 21:38:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-containers Short Description: Containers for Plexus Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 01:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 21:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180136.n4I1aJqB027229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 21:36:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: plexus-classworlds Short Description: Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 02:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180202.n4I22U7h031371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 22:02:29 EDT --- Sources moved upstream, fixed URL. Fixed license. Assuming the text below applies to the whole plexus project: http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html But the truth is, in this particular subproject that header is not to be found in any file. Sort of weird. Anyway, the new spec file is in place and the SRPM is now: SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-cli-1.2-6.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks for catching the SVN URL problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 02:08:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180208.n4I28f8u032440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 22:08:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-digest.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-digest-1.0-8.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks for the pre-review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 02:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 22:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180236.n4I2alB2028020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 22:36:45 EDT --- It seems most files have the MIT license, 4 have the ASL 2.0 license and this one, even in the last tag http://svn.codehaus.org/plexus/tags/plexus-mail-sender-1.0-alpha-7/plexus-mail-sender-api/src/main/java/org/codehaus/plexus/mailsender/util/DateFormatUtils.java does not have one. It is a very small (2-line) utility class and I counted 6 references. We could try and patch it out but the lines added will have to be identical to these two lines we are suppressing -- I can't see a different way to do this in Java. There are java source files in the plexus stuff everywhere BTW, they should be covered by: http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html which is the official project header that should be added to every file. I don't know if Deepak would be able to convince maven to build without this plexus-mail-sender thing. So I fixed the License to: MIT, ASL 2.0 and Plexus and re-uploaded: Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-mail-sender.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/plexus-mail-sender-1.0-0.a2.8.jpp6.src.rpm Does it help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 03:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 23:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180330.n4I3UJd3014065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 --- Comment #5 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 23:30:18 EDT --- Fixed license. Changed spec file so that it uses export from the RELEASE_1_6 tag. Replaced the source tar ball with that. Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/dumbster.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/dumbster-1.6-7.jpp6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 03:36:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 23:36:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180336.n4I3anD6015377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-17 23:36:48 EDT --- License fixed. Thanks for the pre-review! Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/directory-naming.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/directory-naming-0.8-4.jpp6.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180406.n4I46XVu010564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:06:32 EDT --- Thanks Jochen! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cnetworkmanager Short Description: Command-line client for NetworkManager Owners: kevin Branches: devel F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180417.n4I4HBLe012102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:17:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180418.n4I4IuWb021635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:18:54 EDT --- cvs done. (The music was only branched for devel/F-11, did you mean for there to be a F-10 in that request as well?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500245] Pre-Review Request: aqute-bndlib - BND Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180421.n4I4Lu0o012863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500245 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:21:55 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500246] Pre-Review Request: plexus-classworlds - Plexus Classworlds Classloader Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180423.n4I4NbXl022481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:23:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180420.n4I4K5Fs022047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:20:04 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180427.n4I4RHpa013716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:27:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180426.n4I4QFaa013642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:26:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500247] Pre-Review Request: plexus-containers - Containers for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180424.n4I4Oin3022664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500247 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 00:24:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180433.n4I4X9Aw014699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-18 00:33:07 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1357657 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 04d0c175f9bbabc8ba8373d2d6b6ed338bacaab2 XML-Feed-0.43.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=21, Tests=378, 7 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.04 sys + 6.04 cusr 0.63 csys = 6.81 CPU) + Packageperl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(XML::Feed) = 0.43 perl(XML::Feed::Content) perl(XML::Feed::Enclosure) perl(XML::Feed::Entry) perl(XML::Feed::Entry::Format::Atom) perl(XML::Feed::Entry::Format::RSS) perl(XML::Feed::Format::Atom) perl(XML::Feed::Format::RSS) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(DateTime::Format::Mail) perl(DateTime::Format::W3CDTF) perl(Feed::Find) perl(LWP::UserAgent) perl(List::Util) perl(Module::Pluggable) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(URI::Fetch) perl(XML::Atom::Content) perl(XML::Atom::Entry) perl(XML::Atom::Feed) perl(XML::Atom::Util) perl(XML::Feed::Content) perl(base) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 04:33:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 00:33:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180433.n4I4XQt4014787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-18 00:33:25 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1357637 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a44ad501b84d1fd31c4d77e80fdd927f67ebc5aa XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=34, Tests=701, 8 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.05 sys + 7.53 cusr 0.62 csys = 8.26 CPU) + Package perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(XML::RSS::LibXML) = 0.3004 perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::ImplBase) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::MagicElement) = 0.02 perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::Namespaces) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::Null) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::V0_9) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::V0_91) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::V1_0) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::V2_0) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(DateTime::Format::Mail) perl(DateTime::Format::W3CDTF) perl(UNIVERSAL::require) perl(XML::LibXML) perl(XML::LibXML::XPathContext) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::MagicElement) perl(XML::RSS::LibXML::Namespaces) perl(base) perl(overload) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 05:09:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:09:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180509.n4I59OQl020354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 01:09:23 EDT --- cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 05:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180518.n4I5IfBA021910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 01:18:40 EDT --- cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 05:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] New: Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Summary: Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: johan at x-tnd.be QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SPECS/tuxmath.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: An educational math software for children, just like TuxTyping for words :) rpmlint on SRPM is clean. rpmlint on RPM gives: tuxmath.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/tuxmath-1.7.2/OFL.txt I think we can ignore the rpmlint here. Package builds fine in mock under F-10 for both F-10 and F-9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 05:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497283] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180539.n4I5dupu001382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 05:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180539.n4I5duRi001403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Bug 500959 depends on bug 497283, which changed state. Bug 497283 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Engine-Kate - Port to Perl of the syntax highlight engine of the Kate texteditor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497283 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 05:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 01:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498204] Review Request: perl-Wx-Perl-DataWalker - implement subclass that shows relatively simple structure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180549.n4I5nrOT003238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498204 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 06:15:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:15:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180615.n4I6FW9Q031191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 02:15:25 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xine-ui-0.99.5-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 06:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180615.n4I6FxAO031238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 02:15:59 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-10.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xine-ui-0.99.5-10.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 06:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180616.n4I6G5xg007851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 02:16:05 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-10.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xine-ui-0.99.5-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 06:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180615.n4I6FF2i007646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 Yang Yong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(yyang at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Yang Yong 2009-05-18 02:15:13 EDT --- Spec URL: http://torweb.toronto.redhat.com/~yyang/saxpath/saxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://torweb.toronto.redhat.com/~yyang/saxpath/saxpath-1.0-1.3.jpp6.src.rpm POM URL: http://torweb.toronto.redhat.com/~yyang/saxpath/saxpath-1.0.pom - why are we shipping code that's been dead upstream for almost 5 years? This release is over 7 years old! A: some packages may still need this old saxpath - please add a URL for the POM file; is it acceptably licensed? A: according to http://www.saxpath.org/, "SAXPath uses an Apache-style open source license.", so I think it is acceptable. - I think you're missing some Requires and Requires(pre), Requires(post) on jpackage-utils for the maven scripts A: added - the maven example in the packaging guidelines uses org.apache.maven as the first argument to %add_to_maven_depmap but this package uses "saxpath". Should it be fully-qualified? A: according to pom file, the groupId is "saxpath", so the first argument of %add_to_maven_depmap should be "saxpath" too. - the license field will likely need to be updated. Spot can offer guidance here. A: updated to License: Saxpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 06:20:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500958] Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180620.n4I6KH05008584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 06:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 02:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180620.n4I6KIYP008606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Bug 500959 depends on bug 500958, which changed state. Bug 500958 Summary: Review Request: perl-PAR-Packer - PAR Packager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500958 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 07:02:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 03:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180702.n4I72KV0006201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-18 03:02:19 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 07:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 03:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180701.n4I71j1u006130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 07:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 03:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] New: Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 Summary: Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kaigai at kaigai.gr.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/mod_selinux.spec_v2.2.1903 SRPM URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/mod_selinux-2.2.1903-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Apache/SELinux plus is an extra module (mod_selinux.so) which enables to launch contents-handler (it means both of references to static contents and invocations of web applications) with individual and restrictive privileges set, based on http authentication. The mod_selinux.so generates a one-time worker thread for each request, and it assigns the worker restrictive domain based on the authentication prior to launching contents handlers. It means we can apply valid access controls on web-applications, and makes assurance operating system can prevent violated accesses, even if web application contains security bugs or vulnerabilities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 08:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180803.n4I83NmQ027522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #1 from KaiGai Kohei 2009-05-18 04:03:22 EDT --- The rpmlint says as follows: [kaigai at masu ~]$ rpmlint /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i586/mod_selinux-2.2.1903-1.fc11.i586.rpm mod_selinux.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The mod_selinux requires libselinux but I didn't note an explicit earliest version number because it is now unclear when getcon_raw()/setcon_raw() is included into libselinux package. (At least, it was already merged in the period of Fedora *Core*.) Is it allowed to restrict it on somewhere enough new version (e.g libselinux >= 2.0.0)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 08:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180822.n4I8M09m022254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 04:21:59 EDT --- zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 08:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180820.n4I8KZxA031347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 04:20:34 EDT --- zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 08:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180842.n4I8gNEd026096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #23 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-18 04:42:21 EDT --- Bit of a build problem in EL-5 on ppc at the moment. I need to ask someone in rel-eng to take a look. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/2328-zerofree-1.0.1-5.el5/ppc/root.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 08:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 04:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] New: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-Stderr/perl-Tk-Stderr.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-Stderr/perl-Tk-Stderr-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module captures that standard error of a program and redirects it to a read only text widget, which doesn't appear until necessary. When it does appear, the user can close it; it'll appear again when there is more output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 09:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 05:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494199] Review Request: drascula-international - Subtitles for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180928.n4I9Shtq012829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494199 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-18 05:28:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > cvs done. Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 09:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 05:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494197] Review Request: drascula-music - Background music for Drascula: The Vampire Strikes Back In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905180928.n4I9SUET002782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494197 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-18 05:28:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > cvs done. Thanks! Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 11:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181100.n4IB02PU020756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 --- Comment #8 from Wojciech Pilorz 2009-05-18 07:00:01 EDT --- No, not yet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 11:38:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:38:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181138.n4IBcGla005974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 07:38:15 EDT --- imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 11:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181138.n4IBcAPB005940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 07:38:09 EDT --- imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 11:46:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 07:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458090] Review Request: LuxRender - Lux Renderer, an unbiased rendering system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181146.n4IBkF5k007812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458090 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #35 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-18 07:46:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > I have build the -22 release for F-11 and F-10. It will be nice, if you can > bundeled it which your update request. OK, I've just imported LuxRender. > > At least I want to offer you the co-maintainership for blender if you want. Thx, I accept. I guess I need to be approved on the blender acl in order to request an update. So I will update both blender/LuxRender then. Thx for this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 12:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181202.n4IC2GAL011806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 12:03:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:03:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181203.n4IC3bCL012024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #24 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-18 08:03:36 EDT --- Seemed to be a temporary blib, and zerofree is now built in EL-5 too. http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/2330-zerofree-1.0.1-5.el5/ Thanks everyone for helping, particularly Jussi for the detailed and useful review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 12:09:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:09:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181209.n4IC9xSH013484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-18 08:09:57 EDT --- We still need some confirmation from upstream as to what the license is on the unmarked files. I'm also not sure why you added the "Plexus" license to the list of files in this package, when you only found MIT and ASL 2.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 12:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 08:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181258.n4ICw420024600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi --- Comment #18 from Ville Skytt? 2009-05-18 08:58:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > * Scriptlets > > - Update GTK icon cache update scriptlets: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache > > This was already partly done, but I rewrote the part to use the snippets > above. The "touch --no-create ..." %post part appears to be missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 13:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181305.n4ID5kaV015735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kanarip at kanarip.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 13:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181310.n4IDAgs1017369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-18 09:10:41 EDT --- Oops, I also missed it on my review, sorry... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 13:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456353] Review Request: libffado - Free firewire audio driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181333.n4IDXGJL001182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456353 --- Comment #8 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-18 09:33:14 EDT --- As of yesterday, now -rc2 is available. Doubt this will make it into the F11 release media, but at least we have a new enough jack now, so it could easily be an F11 update... Updated rc2 packages here: http://wilsonet.com/packages/libffado/libffado.spec http://wilsonet.com/packages/libffado/libffado-2.0-0.4.rc2.fc11.src.rpm Builds on F11-x86_64 just fine, haven't tested anything beyond that yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 13:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181346.n4IDkmju005034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Bug 500926 depends on bug 501006, which changed state. Bug 501006 Summary: Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 13:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 09:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181346.n4IDkka3004941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-18 09:46:45 EDT --- Now closing. (Please fix GTK icon cache updating scriptlets, sorry) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181421.n4IELjOo001789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Walsh 2009-05-18 10:21:44 EDT --- Adam, Ted has written python bindings for XCB, could you add them to your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181419.n4IEJXu2001028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com Component|Package Review |xcb-util AssignedTo|dwalsh at redhat.com |mnowak at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:20:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:20:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181420.n4IEKWWN012982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Walsh 2009-05-18 10:20:31 EDT --- Michael, Ted has written python bindings for XCB, could you add them to your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181420.n4IEKvYT013051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Daniel Walsh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|xcb-util |libxcb AssignedTo|mnowak at redhat.com |ajax at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181419.n4IEJblq012411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-05-18 10:19:36 EDT --- In response to comment #6, please refer back to comment #2. There are 6 (not 4) files under an ASL license and they contain ASL 1.1 (not ASL 2.0) notices. There is no file in this distribution with an ASL 2.0 license notice. (Three of the 6 are test files, but that still makes 3, not 4, source files with the ASL 1.1 license.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181424.n4IEOj5N002597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181424.n4IEOTOZ002544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-05-18 10:24:28 EDT --- Looks good. This one is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 14:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 10:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181445.n4IEjPG3008126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-18 10:45:24 EDT --- I guess this should be separate package, as xcb-util is. Looks like the release cycle of xpyb is different from libxcb's. And, e.g., in Gentoo it is a separate package [1]. [1] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/x11-libs/xpyb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181508.n4IF8mNg025241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #3 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-18 11:08:46 EDT --- Sadly, --disable-static doesn't work, and dropping the autoreconf results in hard-coded rpaths. Don't have time to chase this further at the moment, but I think I've cleaned up just about everything else now, and will commit to the devel branch shortly... $ rpmlint libavc1394-0.5.3-6.fc12.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint *.rpm libavc1394-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181509.n4IF9V6k025360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #6 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-05-18 11:09:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Fedora review R-BSgenome-1.10.5-1.fc10.src.rpm (2009-05-11) > ! However it is not the latest version (1.12.0 is available for BioC 2.4) > ! BuildRequires and Requires look sane, but > > Is the "Requires: R-biobase" appropriate? It is not listed as a > Depends or Imports on the package web site. (It will be dragged in > as a dependency of the R-Biostrings package which is a direct > dependency) > Corrected in : Spec URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-BSgenome.spec SRPM URL: http://pingou.fedorapeople.org/RPMs/R-BSgenome-1.12.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:09:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:09:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181509.n4IF9pFv014760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 11:09:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I want to package drbdlinks for all active branches and this is only possible > without macro usage currently, look for %{_initrddir} vs. %{_initdir} or so. I thought, all rpm macros defined by the packaging guildlines should be available on EPEL too. > > - Who should owned %{_sysconfdir}/ha.d ? > > Heartbeat owns that directory. But heartbeat is optional, drbdlinks can be > used with and without. Please ask maintainer to create a filesystem subpackage of heartbeat. This subpackage should contains all directories which are common for heartbeat and yours. Your package should depends on this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500492] Review Request: dbus-cxx - C++ wrapper for dbus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181514.n4IFENBV016389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500492 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181516.n4IFGQ30017152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-18 11:16:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Please ask maintainer to create a filesystem subpackage of heartbeat. This > subpackage should contains all directories which are common for heartbeat and > yours. Your package should depends on this package. Hum? IMHO that behaves same as for /etc/logrotate.d/* or /etc/cron.d/* files. It's a dependency, that can be satisfied, but must not necessarily. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181539.n4IFdAOS022613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 --- Comment #8 from Ted X Toth 2009-05-18 11:39:09 EDT --- Just to clarify I'm not the originator of this code Eamon Walsh at NSA is but he can't be a maintainer so I took on the task of trying to get this integrated since I'm relying on it. Also I wasn't aware until now that there was a Gentoo package and it probably wouldn't be a good idea to have the same code with different package names but what do I know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:54:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:54:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181554.n4IFsUSF028180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 11:54:28 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with package name. + Package name fullfill the naming guidelines. + URL shows on proper project home page + Package contains most recent release of the application + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches which upstream sources (md5sum: 86f0f85d24d2c1e72e1e5a039b0f0d72) + Package contains proper license tag + License tag contains GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Package has proper Buildroot defintion + BuildRoot will be clean on start of %clean and %install + Package is BuiildArch noarch + Package has not subpackages + Package contains a %check stanza + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is quiete on source rpm + rpmlint is quiete on binary rpm + Local install and uninstall works fine + %doc stanza is small, so we don't need extra doc subpackage + %files stanza has proper %defattr definition + Files have proper files permissions + All package files are owned by the package + No packaged file is owned by another package + Package has proper Changelog Bad: - BR perl is not requires, because perl(Tk) requires perl - Package doesn't contains verbatin copy of the license text - Source files doesn't contains copyright notes - README says package should have the same license as perl Perl is GPLV2 and Artistic. Please clarify license with upstream. - Koji build fails. Please see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361022 I assume, that we have to deactivate the %check stanza -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 15:59:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 11:59:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181559.n4IFxYxI005993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 11:59:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Hum? IMHO that behaves same as for /etc/logrotate.d/* or /etc/cron.d/* files. > It's a dependency, that can be satisfied, but must not necessarily. Don't tell me anything about old packages which we have perhaps since RH 7 or so. You should know, that this old packages didn't follow the current packaging guidelines. That is the reason why we have the so-called merge review. For a new package I want, the each file/directory should owned by a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181603.n4IG3i0d031448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-18 12:03:43 EDT --- Fixed license. Provided intructions for obtaining source and refresh source tar ball Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-jxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-jxpath-1.2-6.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks a lot for the review and improvement suggestions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181611.n4IGBdNS009410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-18 12:11:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-configuration.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/jakarta-commons-configuration-1.4-4.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks for the pre-review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181609.n4IG9bGf008576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-05-18 12:09:37 EDT --- i thought that those jpp tags are supposed to be removed now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181620.n4IGKL3I003532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181620.n4IGKTmV003613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-18 12:20:28 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-Feed Short Description: Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181619.n4IGJLGf002911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-18 12:19:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Sadly, --disable-static doesn't work, and dropping the autoreconf results in > hard-coded rpaths. Don't have time to chase this further at the moment, but I > think I've cleaned up just about everything else now, and will commit to the > devel branch shortly... Can't you just sed it away from libtool? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181620.n4IGKIvt011583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-18 12:20:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML Short Description: XML::RSS with XML::LibXML Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181620.n4IGKaDT011659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:22:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181622.n4IGMho5004420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-18 12:22:42 EDT --- Updated instructions for obtaining source tar ball. Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/easymock.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/easymock-1.2-9.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks for the pre-review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181644.n4IGibUC009719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 12:44:36 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name. + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag show on proper project home page. + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Package contains valid License tag + License tag state ASL 2.0 as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license tag + License in the source file header matches with license tag + Package tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 855b8b05fd71b39277f2ffbe4c7ae376) + Rpmlint is quiete on source rpm + Package contains smp-enabled build step + Package contains no subpackages + Package has proper defintion of Buildroot + Buildroot will be cleaned on the start of %clean and %install + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + %files stanza have proper %defattr statemend + %files standza haven't duplicated file entries + All package files are owned by the package + No package files belong to another package + Package has proper %Changelog Bad: - Package fails on koji (pleas see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361107) This happens only for 64-bit architectures - Package could no build localy on F-10 because of dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 16:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 12:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181656.n4IGuraf021751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 12:56:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - don't put a file on %{_localstatedir}/run. > you should only create a directory on it Please at a the line %{_localstatedir}/run/%{name}/ on the files stanza, so that directory and all directory belongs will be owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181706.n4IH6jFQ025046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #48 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-18 13:06:40 EDT --- Ok, I'll fix this later today (to shared-only). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181717.n4IHH8MM019810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #5 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-18 13:17:07 EDT --- Just took a quick look. Yes, the sed route works. Committed changes to drop the autofoo and libtool BR and the autoreconf'ing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:16:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:16:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181716.n4IHG0Qk019512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #65 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-18 13:15:56 EDT --- For -11: * Again user directory for mumble-server: - As said above, using %{buildroot} cannot be accepted here because %buildroot should be used only when building this package, and when installing murmur binary rpm this directory (%buildroot) is not expected to exist. Please change this to "-d %{_localstatedir}/lib/mumble-server" ! Scriptlets - By the way is "condrestart" scriptlets at "%postun" unneeded for murmur service? If it is preferable to add this, please check %postun example on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * %{name}-server symlink ------------------------------------------------------- ln -s ../sbin/murmurd %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/%{name}-server ------------------------------------------------------- - As murmurd and %{name}-server are now in the same directory, this can be simplified to: ------------------------------------------------------- ln -s murmurd %{buildroot}%{_sbindir}/%{name}-server ------------------------------------------------------- Now: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181719.n4IHJCNF020307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-18 13:19:11 EDT --- (The submitter cannot be the reviewer and should not set fedora-review flag by yourself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181720.n4IHKCHo020819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-18 13:20:11 EDT --- (The submitter cannot be the reviewer and should not set fedora-review flag by yourself) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490354] Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181721.n4IHLPEN029976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478613] Review Request: ledger - A powerful command-line double-entry accounting system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181722.n4IHMJbd030166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478613 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] New: Review Request: - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: balajig81 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: Hi I just finished packaging Ascii which is my first package and I would appreciate a review so that i could add this into fedora . Ascii is one of the packages mentioned in the Package Wishlist. Thanks for your time. Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181730.n4IHUgGE024018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #1 from Balaji G 2009-05-18 13:30:42 EDT --- It would be great if some could sponsor me as this is my first package. Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181748.n4IHmJXx005761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-18 13:48:18 EDT --- Ah, I mis-got you there - sorry. It should be %{_localstatedir}/run/%{name}/ of course, my packaging mistake. Anything else except that and /etc/ha.d/-mess? Regarding %{_initrddir} vs. %{_initdir}: %{_initrddir} lives on EL-4/5, while %{_initdir} lives on F-10/F-11/Rawhide. Thus two different macros, but EPEL is getting often ignored by packagers, so it doesn't matter for many. And if you don't want to mess with macro stuff inside spec file or make individual changes per branch, /etc/rc.d/init/ is now the only sane and really readable way inside of a spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181758.n4IHw7Il009096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181755.n4IHtZqg008387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 13:55:34 EDT --- OK, I will take a look on it, if the package is ok, I will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 17:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 13:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181759.n4IHx0eD032436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 13:59:00 EDT --- At first, it will be nice, if you can upload the source rpm too. Without the source rpm I can't start to review your packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:09:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:09:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181809.n4II9MEb003029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-18 14:09:21 EDT --- Okay, can you build it in rawhide so I can do the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181812.n4IICLFV004147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 14:12:20 EDT --- At first some advices * Please add a full qualified URL from which you can downloaded the upstream tar ball in the Source tag * GPL is not a valid abbrevious of the GPL license. Please keep in mind, that there are several versions of the GPL. I detailed explaination you may find at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses * Please remove the Packager tag * You don't need to check for the buildroot before delete it on the beginning of %clean and %install * Please delete the brackets, if you fill out the predefined fields. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:22:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:22:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181822.n4IIMg2i007791@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #5 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-05-18 14:22:40 EDT --- - the description is "too long": make it a little paragraph if you will - mixed use of spaces and tabs in .spec - the Source0 should be a complete URL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181828.n4IISiat018542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 14:28:43 EDT --- Regarding of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros only %{_initrdddir} is valid, which shows to %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181830.n4IIUdqm010401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-18 14:30:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > Now closing. > (Please fix GTK icon cache updating scriptlets, sorry) Whoops, the %post scriplet was missing. Fixed in the -11 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181830.n4IIUKUU010271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-18 14:30:18 EDT --- Koji Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361395 Review: - rpmlint checks return nothing - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (BSD) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (576a215d35d6bd8299cc887459273bc509913873) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181835.n4IIZ422020884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-18 14:35:03 EDT --- This should fix all problems. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile-1.1b-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: xdrfile-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. This is not a problem since -devel requires the main package which includes the documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181841.n4IIfE3S022761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #10 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-18 14:41:13 EDT --- Well, /usr/lib/rpm/platform/i586-linux/macros from rpm-4.6+ shows following: %_initddir %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d # Deprecated misspelling %_initrddir %{_initddir} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181841.n4IIfdia022913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #41 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-18 14:41:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > I made a Spec that obsoletes bluetooth-applet, since that's the dual-icon > showing up. Please do not obsolete anything in Fedora that's not really obsolete, you don't replace it, don't conflict with it and haven't agreed with the maintainer. The package seems fine in other respects and I'll approve it once you get sponsored. In order to sponsor you, I'd like to see a couple of informal reviews you've done. That's usually done to demonstrate you're familiar with the guidelines and RPM packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181851.n4IIpe89017273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 --- Comment #7 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-18 14:51:39 EDT --- Building now, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361505 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:50:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:50:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181850.n4IIoIwV016943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-18 14:50:16 EDT --- Assigning. As far as I checked me-tv source code there seems no legal concern. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181852.n4IIqFGx026427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 14:52:14 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 18:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 14:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181859.n4IIxGSR028270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: - |Review Request: ascii - | | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:06:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181906.n4IJ6ZUS022930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-18 15:06:31 EDT --- spot, It looks like the upstream is a little slow with responding. Can we come up with a temporary resolution until they respond since there are many other globus packages that depend on this one awaiting review? If yes, what should the license tag be? Or is this an absolute blocker? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225988] Merge Review: libavc1394 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181915.n4IJFKtW028290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225988 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-18 15:15:15 EDT --- rpmlint output: libavc1394-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - This is OK, since -devel requires main package that includes documentation. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:15:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:15:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181915.n4IJFgbX004561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-18 15:15:41 EDT --- That may be. If you want to change the packaging guildlines you may feell free to open a discussion of the fedora-packaging list. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181922.n4IJMuiR008816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-18 15:22:55 EDT --- "ASL 2.0 and OpenSSL" is the correct license tag. I don't think this is a blocker, even though upstream has incorrected added the ASL 2.0 terms to the OpenSSL header files. We'll just use those files under the proper OpenSSL licensing. Please follow up with upstream to get it corrected, but I'm lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:23:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:23:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181923.n4IJNQR2000999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-18 15:23:25 EDT --- incorrected should be "incorrectly". It's a Monday, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181940.n4IJeIPo011816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-05-18 15:40:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnome-applet-bubblemon Short Description: Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel Owners: edwintb Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181924.n4IJOWVI009573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-18 15:24:30 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 Other source files mentioned in spec are at http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview sha1sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 f2bd1d448cddb6bddfb5c62f97e898a97d253c5e 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 5c14449d2960ddba89efc48269ba6f3b 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 Builds in mock cleanly > rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm 389-ds-base.i386: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dirsrv 389-ds-base.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-1 1.2.1-1.fc10 389-ds-base.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. For the first warning - the directory server does its own log rotation, so no need for logrotate. For the second warning - I have no idea - there is no .fc10 in the Changelog section For the third warning - yes, this is intentional that the file is named "dirsrv" and not the Fedora package name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181949.n4IJnG6A022834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-18 15:49:14 EDT --- Okay then. Thanks spot! There are no other issues with this package. ---------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gssapi-gsi) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 19:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 15:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905181957.n4IJvNmg025272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-18 15:57:21 EDT --- Updated Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 e84240547e2f7b97d0576bcb85c06a57 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 17581245a0d95b3f7cda90c3ed83b7984afe9b2c 389-adminutil-1.1.8.tar.bz2 I would like to waive or otherwise accept the rpmlint results. This is the output I get from rpmlint - same results with both rpmlint 0.85 and 0.87 on Fedora 10 389-adminutil.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libadmsslutil.so.1.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.0 389-adminutil.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libadminutil.so.1.1.8 exit at GLIBC_2.0 This is ok - these are functions specifically for handling fatal errors on behalf of the calling application. 389-adminutil-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The devel package has no documentation - it's all in the base package rpmlint -v /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/389-adminutil-1.1.8-2.fc10.src.rpm 389-adminutil.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not sure where the other errors are coming from. I do know that libadminutil does not strictly need to link directly against ssl, nss, ssldap60, or ldif60 - but all applications that want to support SSL (which is all of them) will need to also link with libadmsslutil which does require the SSL libs. ldif60 is not strictly needed but it doesn't hurt to link with it. The ICU dependencies are required to link with ICU even though rpmlint says they are not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182006.n4IK6aCS028707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-05-18 16:06:34 EDT --- Sorry, here it is: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182010.n4IKAsKs031317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rayvd at bludgeon.org Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-05-18 16:10:51 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: weechat New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: rayvd -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182020.n4IKKqZs028480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #22 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-18 16:20:49 EDT --- Good, so I can expect review soon? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182019.n4IKJPbO027589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-18 16:19:24 EDT --- Updated Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 81c41383af361e5591650edb38c3f3d8 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 f1ac01ab09afb65d929f4552951240a1c246971d 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-1.1.7-5.src.rpm Other files mentioned in Source in the spec file are in http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview 389-admin.src: W: strange-permission 389-admin-git.sh 0775 - Fixed - see new SRPM above 389-admin.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod - this is to work around a bug in rpm - if you mark a file/directory as config(noreplace) rpm will preserve the file contents, but not the ownership/permissions. 389-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin - this is intentional - we did not want the service name to be the same as the package name because we knew we were going to change the package name 389-admin.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libds-admin-serv.so.0.0.0 PR_vsnprintf - How can I fix these? Do they need to be fixed? AFAICT fedora-ds-admin has been running with this "problem" for years with no ill effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182024.n4IKOseL030921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2009-05-18 16:24:53 EDT --- Fixed description http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182035.n4IKZnSc006356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #66 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-18 16:35:47 EDT --- Done everything you said above. SPEC: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble.spec SRPM: http://78.46.84.75/fedora/mumble-1.1.8-12.fc10.src.rpm Made an review here(older): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 and here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:36:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:36:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] New: Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Summary: Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-console-1.1.3-2.src.rpm Description: A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server. This is a rename of fedora-idm-console to 389-console. Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 bbf9b8e74b9746d65b1fd1871a665208 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 f220b8d5b1b1a737f0744f2eef1e07ed8b5aa460 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 Compiles cleanly in mock rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 389-console.i386: E: no-binary - the only reason this is not a noarch package is because of the dependency on jss which has a specific arch 389-console-debuginfo.i386: E: empty-debuginfo-package - this is a java package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182017.n4IKHr97003099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-18 16:17:52 EDT --- Hello Louis. This is not official review. I'm looking for a sponsor like you. ---------------------------------------------------------------- - remove Vendor tag. Its not needed. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - Consider using parallel make if possible. If not write in comment above make why not. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - install doesn't preserve timestamps. Add INSTALL="install -p" like: make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25install_section ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - update package to new version. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - I'm unable to download source but are you sure that License is only GPL? If possible be more specific like GPLv3+... ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - %doc part can go into one line. Its easier to read but its your choice. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - you need to make space between changelogs: * Thu Mar 12 2009 Louis Lagendijk - something * Thu Feb 19 2009 Louis Lagendijk - something * ... ---------------------------------------------------------------- - you're missing "-" at the beginning of some changes. ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- - changelog part is missing version and release number: * Thu Mar 12 2009 Louis Lagendijk - ---------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182049.n4IKnvre011595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-console -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182054.n4IKsQ7H012851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-ds-console -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501383] New: Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 Summary: Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-console-1.2.0-2.src.rpm Description: A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Directory Server. The 389 Console is required to load and run these jar files. This is a rename of fedora-ds-console to 389-ds-console. Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 90bd0d779719ef7d4cd57de3054b8721 389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 88766feff50b7c66b2b6e53223fd60a3df0c3f62 389-ds-console-1.2.0.tar.bz2 Compiles cleanly in mock rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182101.n4IL1V3u015252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-18 17:01:30 EDT --- License tag should be: Python or ZPLv2.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 20:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 16:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501385] New: Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 Summary: Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-console-1.1.3-2.src.rpm Description: A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Admin Server. The 389 Console is required to load and run these jar files. This is a rename of fedora-ds-admin-console to 389-admin-console. Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-admin-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-admin-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 68a27a56334d4ab44b3b44a81f84d8a8 389-admin-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-admin-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 aa1d81fd2a8e2d70dfb2aa6e3df3f11e3cef29e7 389-admin-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 Compiles cleanly in mock rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182102.n4IL2evM015633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-18 17:02:38 EDT --- Thank you for the review. I will follow what upstream will do about the issue. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gssapi-gsi Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182111.n4ILB7g5018294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #4 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-05-18 17:11:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hello Louis. > > This is not official review. I'm looking for a sponsor like you. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - remove Vendor tag. Its not needed. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > good catch, a left over from the Sourceforge release > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - Consider using parallel make if possible. If not write in comment above make > why not. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > done > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - install doesn't preserve timestamps. Add INSTALL="install -p" like: > make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" install > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25install_section > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > done > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - update package to new version. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Not sure what you mean here. Anyhow, the versions available now are based on the version I released on sourceforge Sat May 16 > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - I'm unable to download source but are you sure that License is only GPL? If > possible be more specific like GPLv3+... > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > See license included. It is actually the Cups license, which is GPLv2. Corrected. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - %doc part can go into one line. Its easier to read but its your choice. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Done > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - you need to make space between changelogs: > > * Thu Mar 12 2009 Louis Lagendijk > - something > > * Thu Feb 19 2009 Louis Lagendijk > - something > > * ... > Done > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - you're missing "-" at the beginning of some changes. > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > Done > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - changelog part is missing version and release number: > > * Thu Mar 12 2009 Louis Lagendijk > - > ---------------------------------------------------------------- Done I found a few more issues when I ran rpmlint on the srp. These are corrected as well. New versions available: Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.3-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182128.n4ILS7Zj000715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-admin-console -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182125.n4ILPuQb032585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-18 17:25:55 EDT --- There is one tiny issue left - which I should have noted earlier: According to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R#Documentation_files the NAMESPACE file should not be marked %doc. I trust you can fix that before importing the package to cvs. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] New: Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Summary: Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-dsgw.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-dsgw-1.1.2-3.src.rpm Description: 389 Directory Server Gateway is a collection of 3 web applications that run on top of the Administration Server used by the Directory Server. This is a rename of fedora-ds-dsgw to 389-dsgw Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 0357fee5f1ab61e7ead345a2c76cd3b6 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 bf86c886da9c256726a8df15310459532da45eeb 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 Compiles cleanly in mock rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182131.n4ILVZcK001884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-dsgw -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182143.n4ILhBNL028609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #5 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-05-18 17:43:10 EDT --- Succesfully built for F9: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361803 f10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361790 F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361810 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 21:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 17:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182155.n4ILtHIj032025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-05-18 17:55:15 EDT --- Thanks for the review (once again :-) ), I will fix the %doc before importing New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-BSgenome Short Description: Infrastructure shared by all the Biostrings-based genome data packages Owners: pingou Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 22:10:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:10:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501400] Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182210.n4IMA3CP003570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501400 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shaines at redhat.com Alias| |389-ds -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 22:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501400] New: Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501400 Summary: Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rmeggins at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-1.1.3-2.src.rpm Description: The 389 Directory Server, Administration Server, and Console Suite provide the LDAPv3 server, the httpd daemon used to administer the server, and the console GUI application used for server and user/group administration. This is a rename of fedora-ds to 389-ds Compiles cleanly in mock rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 389-ds.src: W: no-%build-section - this is a meta package which allows you to install 389-ds and get all of the other 389 packages. There is no source, only Requires: for the other packages. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 22:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182217.n4IMHLO6005282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 --- Comment #49 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-18 18:17:20 EDT --- http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/eclib.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/eclib-20080310-8.p7.fc10.src.rpm Should work ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 22:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182218.n4IMIPPU005524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #50 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-18 18:18:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclib Short Description: A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves Owners: konradm Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 22:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500242] Pre-Review Request: maven-wagon - Tools to manage artifacts and deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182247.n4IMlVgc012766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500242 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-18 18:47:30 EDT --- I am really sorry, Jesse just pointed out to me that maven-wagon is already a Fedora package. So I have to close this bug and make sure a Review is not requested. But not all work was lost, there were many changes since the alpha version we had and having someone take a look at it was not a bad idea. Thank you Alexander and Kevin, and please accept my appologies. -- Fernando -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 22:48:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:48:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182248.n4IMmWjH013069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500243] Pre-Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for XPath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182330.n4INUu0O032027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500243 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:30:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182340.n4INe7Pd025044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:40:06 EDT --- Ray: Have you asked Paul if he wants to maintain this in epel and/or has no interest in doing so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182341.n4INfc3g002144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:41:36 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182345.n4INjpDb026549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:45:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182346.n4INkmXJ026707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:46:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182342.n4INgfPM025602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #51 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:42:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:43:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182343.n4INhj8A025783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:43:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182344.n4INipFN002677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:44:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 18 23:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 19:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905182354.n4INsQQC028421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-18 19:54:22 EDT --- Jeff! Glad to hear you are still around. ;) Whatever you guys decide to do is fine with me. I would be happy to work with Jeff to get this imported and built, or let Henrique submit a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 00:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190006.n4J06Gja008180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #32 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-18 20:06:14 EDT --- Hi jebba, please, feel free to continue your great job with this package. I'm still learning how to package, so,I think you'll be a better maintainner than me. Glad to hear you are still around. ;) [2] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 00:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 20:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190025.n4J0PNNU003569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 --- Comment #8 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-05-18 20:25:22 EDT --- Yes. Via email. And he should be CC'd on this in case he wants to pipe up. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:38:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:38:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190138.n4J1cblx030711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Tony Fu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo+ | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 21:38:35 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190158.n4J1wwcN003740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 21:58:57 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:58:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190158.n4J1wUOS003641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.1.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:00:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:00:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190200.n4J20lvo026942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:00:46 EDT --- libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190201.n4J213o7027024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:01:02 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:00:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:00:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190200.n4J20Bcf026632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:00:09 EDT --- gvrpcd-1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190202.n4J22MNv027402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.3-4.fc10 |0.0.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190201.n4J21r1U027240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:01:52 EDT --- python-coverage-2.85-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:58:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190158.n4J1wki6025951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 21:58:45 EDT --- python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190158.n4J1wPDg025853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 21:58:24 EDT --- imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190201.n4J218Wo027064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 01:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190158.n4J1wpaa025992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.6.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:01:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:01:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190201.n4J21vor027287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.85-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:03:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:03:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190203.n4J23Tm3005600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:03:28 EDT --- libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:02:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190202.n4J22HwV005284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:02:16 EDT --- libmetalink-0.0.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190202.n4J224Qn005151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:02:04 EDT --- gvrpcd-1.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190200.n4J20qih004679@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497947] Review Request: libmetalink - A Metalink C library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190203.n4J23Yk2005630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497947 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.3-4.fc11 |0.0.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:02:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:02:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190202.n4J22AHL005202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-2.fc10 |1.3-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190204.n4J24V41006019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:04:30 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190203.n4J23MjR005562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.5.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487114] Review Request: gvrpcd - A program for announcing VLANs using GVRP. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190200.n4J20GBL004496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487114 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190201.n4J21F1v004872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:01:14 EDT --- peppy-0.9.86-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update peppy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:03:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:03:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190203.n4J23eWJ005684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:03:39 EDT --- cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cnetworkmanager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5093 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190204.n4J241Eg005789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:04:00 EDT --- rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rpmdepsize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190201.n4J21h1T005044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:01:42 EDT --- wannier90-1.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wannier90'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190203.n4J2390f005505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:03:07 EDT --- cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update cnetworkmanager'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190207.n4J27XAX029452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:07:32 EDT --- perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190203.n4J23GEu027879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:03:15 EDT --- sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190206.n4J26OFP029163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:06:24 EDT --- python-morbid-0.8.6.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190206.n4J26h9e007506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:06:43 EDT --- python-coverage-2.85-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:06:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499487] Review Request: python-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190206.n4J26mhD007536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499487 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.85-2.fc10 |2.85-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190209.n4J29QMS008102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:09:25 EDT --- imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499475] Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190206.n4J26UY2007445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.6.1-1.fc10 |0.8.6.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190208.n4J288MF007772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:08:07 EDT --- wannier90-1.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update wannier90'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5115 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190204.n4J24hxr006217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:04:43 EDT --- rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rpmdepsize'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5101 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190208.n4J28CcI029882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:08:12 EDT --- perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:08:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:08:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190208.n4J28Rvf029967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:08:26 EDT --- sipwitch-0.5.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2Aw6G031130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:10:57 EDT --- globus-gsi-credential-2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190212.n4J2CKT2031547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:12:19 EDT --- grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499137] Review Request: sipwitch - SIP telephony server for secure phone systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190208.n4J28XSZ030008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499137 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.4-3.fc11 |0.5.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190212.n4J2CPvA031601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc11 |0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190207.n4J27cF3029609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.21-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2Aorc031062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.4-3.fc11 |0.1.4-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190209.n4J29aIJ030294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.4-3.fc10 |0.1.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190208.n4J28H4j029922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.014-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190213.n4J2DW0V009940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:13:32 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:12:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190212.n4J2ChHG009728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:12:42 EDT --- perl-Config-INI-0.014-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:13:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190213.n4J2DaKL009974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc9 |0.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2ABqq008848@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:10:10 EDT --- perl-Locale-PO-0.21-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493001] Review Request: imgtarget - ImgTarget is a front-end to functionality provided by ArgyllCMS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2AjEG009109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493001 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:10:45 EDT --- imgtarget-0.1.4-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2AOAu008971@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:10:22 EDT --- grfcodec-0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:11:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453861] Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190211.n4J2B30q009196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2-1.fc9 |2.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499087] Review Request: perl-Locale-PO - Perl module for manipulating .po entries from GNU gettext In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2AGBh008898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499087 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.21-1.fc10 |0.21-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498744] Review Request: grfcodec - A suite of programs to modify Transport Tycoon Deluxe's GRF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190210.n4J2ASNr009030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498744 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.11-0.2.r2111.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190212.n4J2CV7f009668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:12:30 EDT --- peppy-0.9.86-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update peppy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5144 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190213.n4J2DKnv032111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-18 22:13:19 EDT --- gcolor2-0.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497465] Review Request: perl-Config-INI - Config::INI Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190212.n4J2Cl9Q031998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497465 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.014-1.fc10 |0.014-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499214] Review Request: gcolor2 - A simple color selector for GTK+2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190213.n4J2DOCr032144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499214 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-1.fc11 |0.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190217.n4J2HvHr000742@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #3 from KaiGai Kohei 2009-05-18 22:17:56 EDT --- Jochen, Thanks for your detailed reviewing. I uploaded the revised Spec and SRPM at: Spec URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/mod_selinux.spec_v2.2.1904 SRPM URL: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/mod_selinux-2.2.1904-1.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #2) > - Package fails on koji (pleas see: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361107) > This happens only for 64-bit architectures Its Makefile assumed an external file provided by httpd-devel is deployed at /usr/lib/httpd/build/special.mk, but it was /usr/lib64/httpd/build/special.mk in x86_64 and ppc64. So, I updated it as follows: - top_srcdir=/etc/httpd - top_builddir=/usr/lib/httpd - include /usr/lib/httpd/build/special.mk + top_srcdir=/etc/httpd + top_builddir=$(shell $(APXS) -q libdir)/httpd + include $(top_builddir)/build/special.mk The /usr/sbin/apxs (provided by httpd-devel) can return a correct path for the target environment, so the Makefile new gets being portable. at x86_64: [kaigai at masu ~]$ /usr/sbin/apxs -q libdir /usr/lib64 at i386: [kaigai at saba ~]$ /usr/sbin/apxs -q libdir /usr/lib > - Package could no build localy on F-10 because of dependencies Yes, this package uses a new feature in linux-2.6.28 will be available in F-11. The mod_selinux switches the security context on the worker thread to handle a http request prior to invocations of contents handler. But it was not available at linux-2.6.27 or older. Fortunately, it was sumarized at SELinux-ML yesterday: http://marc.info/?l=selinux&m=124265539924989&w=2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190227.n4J2RcJu003276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 22:27:37 EDT --- For impatient users waiting, in the meantime you can install xmonad-contrib in your a/c using "cabal install xmonad-contrib". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 02:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190236.n4J2a39R005540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #33 from jebba 2009-05-18 22:36:01 EDT --- Heh. Well, i guess i wasnt quite clear enough... I dont have (or really wont have real-soon-now) access to Fedora(-ish) boxes so I wont be able to maintain this package. Sorry about that. ?Back to you Henrique! You should be able to take that spec and patches and be able to build/import fine. It shouldnt require any further changes at the present. Have fun! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:25:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:25:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190325.n4J3PECA026141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-18 23:25:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > ghc-X11-xft and ghc-utf8-string seem not to be required by this package Well it is true that you can build xmonad-contrib without them since they are optional build deps, but various modules do require XMonad.Util.Font for xft support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 03:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 23:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494695] Review Request: qutIM - Multiplatform Instant Messenger on Qt4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190333.n4J3X9ZQ017197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494695 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-18 23:33:08 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 04:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190417.n4J4HxNc025832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 00:17:58 EDT --- perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 04:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190418.n4J4I4SV025868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 00:18:04 EDT --- perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 04:40:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:40:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190440.n4J4eMSx029425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-19 00:40:21 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 04:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190439.n4J4dimW007068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-19 00:39:43 EDT --- built in rawhide - waiting for perl-XML-Atom to go stable on branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 04:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190452.n4J4qTEP031565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 04:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 00:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190451.n4J4pWu5031475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 00:51:30 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ibus-table-yong.spec Package Name: ibus-table-yong Short Description: Yong table data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 05:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190529.n4J5TVGZ015923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #42 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-05-19 01:29:29 EDT --- Regarding obsoletes: I know I shouldn't obsolete other packages without user confirmation, thats why I didn't even send it to koji, I simply wanted to try the "Obsoletes" directive. Regarding reviews: I'll look around for other RPMs and do some reviews, I'm really looking forward to having Blueman officially in Fedora! :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 05:37:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:37:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190537.n4J5bM5e007788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |arthurg.work at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from arthurguru 2009-05-19 01:37:21 EDT --- Hi Silas, Whilst doing an informal review for another package, I questioned the %{?dist} location used for the Release: field in the spec file when intermixed with a snapshot string. It appears that the correct syntax in your case should be: Release: 0.20090505svn%{snapshot}%{?dist} Recommend you check this out further and correct if necessary Best regards, Arthur Gouros. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 05:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190535.n4J5Z8fB007515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 467239 depends on bug 467235, which changed state. Bug 467235 Summary: Review Request: globus-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus Callout Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467235 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 467239 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 467239 depends on bug 453857, which changed state. Bug 453857 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-19 01:35:06 EDT --- I went over this package. No major issues. I still have to see it building in koji in all archs and to check the resulting packages. Meanwhile I'd like to ask two questions. - rpmlints globus-gss-assist-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gss-assist-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored. ? globus-gss-assist-normalization.patch seems to be rejected by upstream without apparent explanation (closed WONTFIX). What might be wrong? ? For globus-gss-assist.patch, you say "the GRIDMAPDIR patch from VDT". Who is this VDT, is it related to upstream globus? If not, would you consider submitting the patch to them? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 05:41:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:41:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501433] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Calendar-Mayan OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan-0.0601-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: An implementation of the Mayan Long Count, Haab, and Tzolkin calendars as defined in "Calendrical Calculations The Millennium Edition". Supplemented by "Frequently Asked Questions about Calendars". Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1362528 Additional Comment: This is a new (optional) testing dependency of Moose 0.79. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 05:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190547.n4J5lWB3018948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Garry Reisky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terracon at gmail.com --- Comment #67 from Garry Reisky 2009-05-19 01:47:30 EDT --- I just compiled this on my fedora 11 system and I'd like to mention 3 things. I guess this package is being targeted for f10 but f11 is just about here . 8 days. 1. First is that mumble-overlay complains "32-bit libmumble.so.1 not found in" . To fix this I did a ln -s /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 /usr/lib/mumble/libmumble.so.1 . 2. In plugins shouldn't 'link' plugin be in there by default because it doesn't show up. Settings | Plugins is empty. 3. In Settings | Shortcuts. There aren't any shortcut entries visible. The only one there is push to talk because that one was set with the audio wizard. Other than that the defaults are not there. Even clicking 'restore defaults' does nothing. I'm very happy about this package making it into the repo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 06:07:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:07:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190607.n4J67uKG022469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 06:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190614.n4J6E7UB023240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-19 02:14:06 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1362528 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b64421ef42d3b2c7852a09887057e54e17c748a9 DateTime-Calendar-Mayan-0.0601.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=10, Tests=124, 3 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.03 sys + 2.57 cusr 0.19 csys = 2.89 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan-0.0601-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(DateTime::Calendar::Mayan) = 0.0601 Requires: perl(DateTime) perl(Params::Validate) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 06:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190637.n4J6biJc020192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 02:37:43 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 06:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190637.n4J6bdPH020148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 02:37:38 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 06:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190643.n4J6hMXl021227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-19 02:43:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I went over this package. No major issues. I still have to see it building in > koji in all archs and to check the resulting packages. Meanwhile I'd like to > ask two questions. > > - rpmlints > globus-gss-assist-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation > globus-gss-assist-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation > can be ignored. > > ? globus-gss-assist-normalization.patch seems to be rejected by upstream > without apparent explanation (closed WONTFIX). What might be wrong? There is nothing really wrong, it is just that upstream does not really care about certificate subject names that contain non-ascii characters. The recommended practice by upstream is to not use non-ascii characters in the certificate subject names, so it is a non-issue for them. > ? For globus-gss-assist.patch, you say "the GRIDMAPDIR patch from VDT". Who is > this VDT, is it related to upstream globus? If not, would you consider > submitting the patch to them? Globus is well aware of VDT (virtual data toolkit) - http://vdt.cs.wisc.edu/ - and their patches. They are already submitted to globus bugzilla: https://bugzilla.mcs.anl.gov/globus/show_bug.cgi?id=6192 VDT it is one of the most commonly used distribution channels for the Globus Toolkit. Many users of globus use this patch since they get globus from VDT rather than from upstream directly, so it makes sense to include it. My suspicion is that if I don't include it, I will get a feature request to include it very soon anyway. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 06:58:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 02:58:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190658.n4J6wxvG024317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-19 02:58:57 EDT --- Thanks. No further questions. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1362675 ---------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gss-assist) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190709.n4J79ZiV000317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #12 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 03:09:34 EDT --- (F-11) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-11/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-11/ibus-table-yong.spec ===== (F-10) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-10/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/F-10/ibus-table-yong.spec ===== Package Name: ibus-table-yong Short Description: Yong table data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190715.n4J7F77E027897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 --- Comment #13 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 03:15:06 EDT --- (F-11) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-11/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc12.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-11/ibus-table-yong.spec ===== (F-10) SRPM URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-10/ibus-table-yong-1.1.0.20090422-5.fc10.src.rpm Spec URL: http://cchance.fedorapeople.org/rpms/F-10/ibus-table-yong.spec ===== Package Name: ibus-table-yong Short Description: Yong table data for IBus Table Owners: cchance Branches: F-10, F-11 InitialCC: i18n-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190721.n4J7LKTt029398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190720.n4J7KsOs029331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #9 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-19 03:20:53 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gss-assist Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492778] Review Request: xwine - Graphic Interface for Wine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190717.n4J7Hkx6028478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492778 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.e | |u --- Comment #2 from Felix Schwarz 2009-05-19 03:17:44 EDT --- Is it really sensible including an unmaintained package that saw it's last release in 2004? If the application is still useful, I would suggest that there should be some efforts getting a new, active upstream to have a central place where fixes can be collected. Christoph: The software has no real page, it can be found in the category 'Logiciels divers': http://darken33.free.fr/index.php?cat=4&rub=20 fs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190726.n4J7QOkc030498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:26:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190731.n4J7Veoc005390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:31:39 EDT --- ping - original package submission is gone -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190733.n4J7X01A031875@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-19 03:32:59 EDT --- Please always CC fedora-haskell-list for haskell package reviews. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 07:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 03:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190740.n4J7e0kd006834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #2 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-19 03:39:59 EDT --- Well? Is there something I should be responding to? :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190826.n4J8QY3x018255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-19 04:26:32 EDT --- The package is APPROVED. Since you're sponsored now, please proceed requesting CVS and import your package. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190830.n4J8UquN019135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #50 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-19 04:30:48 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.3.rc3.fc11.src.rpm -- * Tue May 19 2009 Michal Nowak 3.3-0.3.rc3 - 3.3-rc3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190848.n4J8moUI022267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-19 04:48:18 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/drbdlinks-1.17-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190854.n4J8s0i6015497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #5 from Balaji G 2009-05-19 04:53:59 EDT --- Hi Jochen Thanks for your replies. I have uploaded the Source RPM and the Spec files at the location http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190857.n4J8v2mj023999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 --- Comment #30 from Stijn Hoop 2009-05-19 04:57:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=344592) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=344592) Updated Patch0 that completes a build on F-10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 08:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 04:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 181997] Review Request: gpc - The GNU Pascal compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905190856.n4J8uJRD023919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=181997 Stijn Hoop changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stijn at sandcat.nl --- Comment #29 from Stijn Hoop 2009-05-19 04:56:13 EDT --- I just ran into the patch file apply error as well, apparently the patch from Fedora 10 / 11 is more picky about the contents of the patch because this spec file used to build on Fedora 8. Simply rediffing the ia64 part of the patch is enough to complete the build. I'll attach the patch file I used to build gpc for Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 10:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 06:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191041.n4JAfIeW010877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 --- Comment #34 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-19 06:41:14 EDT --- Hmmm... So, I'll take it. If it is ok to you I'll use your spec since this is already approved. (In reply to comment #33) > Heh. Well, i guess i wasnt quite clear enough... I dont have (or really wont > have real-soon-now) access to Fedora(-ish) boxes so I wont be able to maintain > this package. Sorry about that. ?Back to you Henrique! You should be able to > take that spec and patches and be able to build/import fine. It shouldnt > require any further changes at the present. Have fun! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 10:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 06:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439100] Review Request: octaviz - 3D visualization system for Octave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191057.n4JAvsCJ006064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439100 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |henriquecsj at gmail.com --- Comment #22 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-19 06:57:52 EDT --- I'd like to see this package in Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 12:42:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191242.n4JCg5eE007249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #32 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 08:42:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > ...just forgot: Andrew, would you mind building and releasing json as an update > for F9/10/11? It will enable doing the same with jbossweb2 later on, thanks. How would you like to be a co-maintainer? Then you can do it and help out when I suck at maintaining :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 12:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191245.n4JCjnJZ003589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-19 08:45:48 EDT --- New revision. %changelog * Tue May 19 2009 Peter Lemenkov 0-0.3.git20090125 - Corrected 'License' field - Since now ssb_sprom honours optflags http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-tools.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10.src.rpm Koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1363009 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 12:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191249.n4JCnKkw004587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |atorkhov at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:02:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191302.n4JD2X2I013826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:02:31 EDT --- Pre-review accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191308.n4JD8DSv015663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:08:11 EDT --- I get a different SVN revision (776300) but there are no differences. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191306.n4JD61ed015024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:05:59 EDT --- The whitespace differences still exist in the .pom file but I think that's probably fine for pre-review. md5sums match. Accepted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191313.n4JDDgEA017637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:13:40 EDT --- Odd that I get this the first time I try it: $ cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at dumbster.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/dumbster export -r RELEASE_1_6 dumbster Unknown host dumbster.cvs.sourceforge.net. Yet the second time works. There are no differences between my checkout and the contents of SOURCE0. The license field is good. Thanks. Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191310.n4JDAssw016872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:10:52 EDT --- Your URLs are internal to Red Hat :) Please post external ones. (In reply to comment #5) > - please add a URL for the POM file; is it acceptably licensed? > A: according to http://www.saxpath.org/, "SAXPath uses an Apache-style open > source license.", so I think it is acceptable. Spot has said on another bug that .pom files are like .spec files so we don't need to worry about their licenses. > - the maven example in the packaging guidelines uses org.apache.maven as the > first argument to %add_to_maven_depmap but this package uses "saxpath". Should > it be fully-qualified? > A: according to pom file, the groupId is "saxpath", so the first argument of > %add_to_maven_depmap should be "saxpath" too. Okay (my maven ignorance is showing here :) > - the license field will likely need to be updated. Spot can offer guidance > here. > A: updated to License: Saxpath Good. I'll do a full review when the SRPM and .spec have been posted in a public place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191314.n4JDEnI6013355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:14:47 EDT --- I don't think the license field should contain " and Plexus", do you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191318.n4JDIlsF014695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 09:18:46 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191318.n4JDIgSO014654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 09:18:41 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:18:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:18:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191318.n4JDIbsa014573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 09:18:35 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191319.n4JDJaMI014863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #3 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:19:34 EDT --- Spot, can we assume the text regarding licensing being ASL 2.0 at: http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html applies to the whole project? The files in this package (569 lines in total among 4 files) have no license headers and there is no license text in SVN. Fernando: Thanks for fixing the steps to reproduce the source tarball. I'm not sure of the license field being "ASL 2.0 and Plexus" -- shouldn't it just be "ASL 2.0"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191326.n4JDQo53017527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-19 09:26:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Spot, can we assume the text regarding licensing being ASL 2.0 at: > > http://plexus.codehaus.org/get-involved.html > > applies to the whole project? The files in this package (569 lines in total > among 4 files) have no license headers and there is no license text in SVN. Given how divergent the licensing has been in the various plexus bits, I don't think we can safely make that assumption. We need upstream to clarify things, preferrably by fixing their file attribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191331.n4JDVW3H023663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-19 09:31:28 EDT --- *** Bug 486365 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191339.n4JDdaxf021308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|486365 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 13:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 09:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ultrafredde at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: SRPM URL: Dehttp://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.spechttp://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.specscription: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 14:14:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:14:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191414.n4JEEoYF005138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #1 from Federico Hernandez 2009-05-19 10:14:49 EDT --- OK it seems that my description got lost... Here is a new try: Spec URL: http://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task-1.7.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Hi there! I have packaged task, an command-line TODO list manager. The Spec and SRPM are based on the latest release of the upstream package, that is 1.7.0. The rpmlint runs are error and warning free. It would be nice to get a review as well as sponsoring to get task into Fedora. As further information I want to mention that I have close contact to the upstream developer and contribute to the task project (having written the man pages and the bash completion script for the 1.7.0 release). /Federico -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 14:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191419.n4JEJO35001774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Federico Hernandez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |TODO list manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 14:23:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:23:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191423.n4JENAwP008018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Federico Hernandez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 14:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191425.n4JEPBF5004248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #23 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-05-19 10:25:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) Hi David, Please note that I've sponsored Hubert, but if you are going to continue his work you'll have to apply for sponsorship as well. (In reply to comment #22) Peter, maybe we can start an Erlang SIG or something like that? There are a lot of erlang packages which would be nice to have in Fedora, and it would be easier to package them up if this is a joined effort. I'd like to tackle the rabbitmq-xmpp bridge next for instance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 14:49:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:49:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191449.n4JEnZju016520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #24 from David Wragg 2009-05-19 10:49:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Hi David, > > Please note that I've sponsored Hubert, but if you are going to continue his > work you'll have to apply for sponsorship as well. Hi Ruben, Thanks for the note. I was just keeping things moving while Hubert was busy with other commitments. Hubert is still around, and I expect he will continue the submission process, so my involvement is probably more or less over. If that situation changes, I will apply for sponsorship. David -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 14:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 10:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191452.n4JEqCtP017817@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #68 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-05-19 10:52:08 EDT --- regarding #67 3. there are no shortcuts by default. has to be fixed upstream (source: upstream) other issues: 1. upstream also suggests to enable Ice else none of the web frontends there are will work out of the box. Can we enable Ice support? going to checkout the newest version of the package later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 15:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191502.n4JF29W8020888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #14 from steve 2009-05-19 11:02:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Bad: > > 1. The version in the changelog, should be 3.0-4, not 3.0.4. Done. Also, updated version to 3.0-5 due to the changes below. > 2. The sums don't match to upstream: > Upstream SHA1: aeb7887cb4935756cf77deb1ea86973dff0e32fb > Your tarball's SHA1: fb2476bf83cbd14f2030c7c66b7485e49e36671c Fixed. (huh, don't quite remember why there was a difference in the first place) > 3. There is a static lib in the -devel package. Unless we have a good reason, > we don't package static libs: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries Done. Although note that the dynamic lib is included in the wordnet package (rather than the -devel) because the wordnet binaries create a dependency on it. > 4. Devel packages should require the main package (Requires: %{name} = > %{version}-%{release}) > Done. > I'd also prefer if you didn't wildcard everything so broadly in %files. That > approach leads to extra files getting packaged upon updates without noticing > it. Done. The binaries are no longer selected with a wildcard, and all the other files are grouped into reasonably generic wildcards. > Clean up the bad items, and I'll give this another pass. The newer spec and src rpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-5.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for your time. cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 15:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 11:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191557.n4JFvPbu005888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #25 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-05-19 11:57:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) Yes, I am back. Thanks for help, David. We should have a minor release pretty soon with all the changes included, so I will post it here as soon as it is available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191604.n4JG4Iad008114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #15 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-19 12:04:17 EDT --- Well, if you're going to use a shared library here, you should do it properly, as a versioned .so, with proper packaging. libWN_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 3:0:0 will give you what you want, although, you might talk to upstream to be sure they're okay with the .so numbering starting there. Don't forget to delete the .la and .a file, your -devel wildcard is catching them. See why wildcards are tricky! :) Also, you need to change a few things to ensure that the autotooling happens cleanly, specifically: * BuildRequires: libtool * autoreconf -i instead of just autoreconf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191606.n4JG6sQ7006989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #6 from Balaji G 2009-05-19 12:06:53 EDT --- Hi Jochen I have addressed your review comments and have placed the SPEC file and the SRPM at the following location http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Please review the same Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471915] Review Request: jbossweb2 - JBoss Web Server based on Apache Tomcat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191608.n4JG88m8009644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471915 --- Comment #33 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-19 12:08:05 EDT --- Heh...ok ;) Request done in pkgdb. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191607.n4JG7trR009539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #7 from Balaji G 2009-05-19 12:07:54 EDT --- Hi Jochen I have addressed your review comments and have placed the SPEC file and the SRPM at the following location for your review. http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191613.n4JGDGoM008748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-19 12:13:15 EDT --- For a beginner you have provide a nice well-suited package. There are only thwo minor issues which you may fix easily. So I tell you, that I want to sponsor you, after the package will be approved. Good: + Basename SPEC filename matches which package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent stable release of the software + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Packaged tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 4f6fe66dbd9fb3249dd201fd843b8319) + Package contains proper license tag + License tag states GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Consistently rpm macro usage in package + Package doesn't contains any subpackage + Proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Local build works fine + Package support SMP build + Build honours RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Rpmlint is silient on source rpm + Rpmlint is silent on binary rpm + Debuginfo package contains sources + Local install and uninstall works fine + Application doesn't crash on start + Koji build works fine + Files in the files stanza has proper files permission + All packaged files are owned by the pacakge + No packaged file is owned by another package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Patckage has prpoer %Changelog Bad: - Copyright notes in the source files haeaders state GPLv2+ as license for the package - You can remove the requires ncurses line, because rpm create automaticly a Require to the library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191619.n4JGJiWn010526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #14 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-19 12:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > ping? hello Jussi, latest files are here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/jargs/jargs-1.0-5.fc10.src.rpm Koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364002 I still dont understand how build could fail in mock while scratch building ok in koji, however things should be sorted right now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:21:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:21:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191621.n4JGL6Gc011191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #8 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-19 12:21:04 EDT --- It look like, that you didn't upload a correct release of your package. Please keep in mind do increase the release number each time if you make a change on your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:37:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:37:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191637.n4JGb8KF015993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-19 12:37:06 EDT --- After a discusion on fedora-Packaging, We have dicide no to use _initrddir or initddir in the funtere. In addition I have open BZ #501518 for creating a filesystem subpackage for heartbeate. So, after we have clarified this two topics, I'm able to APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191644.n4JGiX1X020852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-19 12:44:32 EDT --- Okay, everything should be fine now. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191649.n4JGnEiO022310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #35 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-19 12:49:12 EDT --- ok. I think the best way forward is to close this, and re-open the other submission for review. :) Thanks guys! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:49:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:49:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191649.n4JGntJG019421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Summary|Review Request: FMIT - Free |Review Request: fmit - Free |Music Instrument Tuner |Music Instrument Tuner --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-19 12:49:54 EDT --- The old review is being closed in favor of this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:50:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:50:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191650.n4JGoxgQ023120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 16:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 12:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191654.n4JGsI1b020861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #9 from Balaji G 2009-05-19 12:54:17 EDT --- Hi Jochen Sorry for the inconvenience. Yes i had uploaded the wrong file.I have updated the release tag in the Spec and uploaded the SRPM at the location for your review. http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191700.n4JH0YuB022835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484331] Review Request: perl-Sendmail-PMilter - Perl binding of Sendmail Milter protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191707.n4JH7i0X027501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484331 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from John Guthrie 2009-05-19 13:07:43 EDT --- This package builds successfully in all branches. Closing now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191726.n4JHQj7N030087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #69 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-19 13:26:43 EDT --- For -12: * postun initscript scriptlets - Now "Requires(postun): initscripts" is also needed for murmur - And this postun scriptlet must be: * the part of "%postun -n murmur", not in the part of mumble %postun scriptlets * And "condrestart" must be called in "[ $1 -ge 1 ]" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:27:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:27:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191727.n4JHR7dt000471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191726.n4JHQFfR032704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-19 13:26:14 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC files matches with packagename + Packagename fullfill naming guildelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent stable release of the application + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 8fb7540bf2a7a8e1fa0086708ed9b881) + Consistently rpm macro usage in this package + Package has no subpackages + Package has proper license tag + License tag exclaim GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package support SMP build + Local install and uninstall works fine + Call of the application works fine + Koji scratch build works fine + Package has small %doc stanza, so we need no extra doc subpackage + Files has proper file permission + All packaged files are owned by the package + %files stanza has no duplicated entries + No packaged file belong to another package Bad: - Copyright headers have only a refernce to the LICENSE/COPYING file. Please talk to upstream, that he should include a more clean copyright note on the source file - Please remove the Packager tag - You don't need to test the existance of the Buildroot before cleaning it. - build don't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS - Rpmlint has warning on source rpm: pmlint ascii-3.8-2.fc10.src.rpm ascii.src: W: summary-not-capitalized interactive ASCII name and synonym chart ascii.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII ascii.src: W: non-standard-group Utilities/Text ascii.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 72, tab: line 82) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - Rpmlint complaints binary package: rpmlint ascii-3.8-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm ascii.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized interactive ASCII name and synonym chart ascii.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary ASCII ascii.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Utilities/Text 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - Debuginfo package doesn't contains sources - Please remove the old Changelog and beginning with a new one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:30:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191730.n4JHUnLf031450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-19 13:30:47 EDT --- Hi Johan, 1] I think we shouldn't ignore this easy-to-fix issue. 2] SPEC doesn't match provided SRPM, could you give us link to latest SRPM? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:45:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191745.n4JHjgU6006146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-05-19 13:45:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: json New Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 Owners: overholt mjakubicek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496117] Review Request: xpyb - Python bindings for XCB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191757.n4JHvBCR009740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496117 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Adam Jackson 2009-05-19 13:57:09 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 496639 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 17:58:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 13:58:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191758.n4JHwF4O007521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 499306 depends on bug 498862, which changed state. Bug 498862 Summary: Review Request: clthreads - POSIX threads C++ access library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-19 13:58:13 EDT --- Fedora review jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-19 * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint output is OK: [ellert at ellert jconv]$ rpmlint *.rpm jconv.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * Package is named according to guidlines * Specfile is named after the package * The package license tag (GPLv2+) is Fedora approved * The package license tag matches the license statements in the sources * The license file (COPYING) is installed as %doc * The specfile is written in legible English * Sources matches upstream, and are the latest version: 7c194e36ecc59fd443ad08405cb40d73 SRPM/jconv-0.8.1.tar.bz2 7c194e36ecc59fd443ad08405cb40d73 jconv-0.8.1.tar.bz2 a33ec6a97fac039400f7674f3bde4ca9 SRPM/jconv-reverbs.tar.bz2 a33ec6a97fac039400f7674f3bde4ca9 jconv-reverbs.tar.bz2 * Package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) * Build requires are sane and reflect the libraries that are linked to during the build * Package owns the directories it creates * No duplicate files * Permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * Macros are used consistently * Package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * Installed filenames are valid UTF8 Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191806.n4JI6apR010436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191808.n4JI86Gt012958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-19 14:08:04 EDT --- For 0.8.12-3: * License - Well, actually COPYING is GPLv3 text, but as far as I checked the source code, the license tag should be "GPLv2+" (Note that just putting GPLv3 license text in the tarball does not specify the version of GPL). * Directory ownership issue - This package should own the directory %_datadir/%name. ! Note that I cannot test this application because I don't have the necessary device. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:10:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:10:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191810.n4JIAYKl013838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #2 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-05-19 14:10:33 EDT --- Hi Jan, Ok, I'll fox the end-of-line issue and will upload the new SPEC/SRPM Sorry, I've uploaded the wrong SRPM :/ Here's the correct one : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191816.n4JIGvOc016100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 --- Comment #4 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-19 14:16:56 EDT --- Something weird is happening. When trying to build new versions of fmit I'm getting this messages: ===Making all in ui make[2]: Entrando no diret?rio `/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7/ui' /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic ConfigForm.ui > ConfigForm.h /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic InstrumentTunerForm.ui > InstrumentTunerForm.h /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl ConfigForm.h ConfigForm.ui > ConfigForm.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc ConfigForm.h > ConfigForm_moc.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl InstrumentTunerForm.h InstrumentTunerForm.ui > InstrumentTunerForm.cpp /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/moc InstrumentTunerForm.h > InstrumentTunerForm_moc.cpp /bin/sh: line 1: 14836 Falha de segmenta??o /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl ConfigForm.h ConfigForm.ui > ConfigForm.cpp make[2]: ** [ConfigForm.cpp] Erro 139 make[2]: ** Esperando que outros processos terminem. /bin/sh: line 1: 14840 Falha de segmenta??o /usr/lib/qt-3.3/bin/uic -impl InstrumentTunerForm.h InstrumentTunerForm.ui > InstrumentTunerForm.cpp make[2]: ** [InstrumentTunerForm.cpp] Erro 139 make[2]: Saindo do diret?rio `/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7/ui' make[1]: ** [all-recursive] Erro 1 make[1]: Saindo do diret?rio `/home/lonely/rpmbuild/BUILD/fmit-0.97.7' make: ** [all] Erro 2 erro: Status de sa?da de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mg3AX7 inv?lido (%build) Erros na constru??o do RPM: Status de sa?da de /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.mg3AX7 inv?lido (%build) === But, just a few days ago this problem is not happening as we can see in the first attempt to make this rpm (Comment #0). Working on jebbas's RPM gets the same result: http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/fmit/0.97.7-6/fmit.spec http://lspooky.fedorapeople.org/fmit/0.97.7-6/fmit-0.97.7-6.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191819.n4JIJjGY016723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #3 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-05-19 14:19:44 EDT --- Ok, I've corrected the rpmlint issue. rpmlint output is now completely clean for both SRPM and RPM. Here's updated links : SRPM : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-3.fc10.src.rpm SPEC : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SPECS/tuxmath.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:38:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:38:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191838.n4JIc52F022038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 14:38:03 EDT --- libmemcached-0.29-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.29-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191838.n4JIc1ad019918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-19 14:38:00 EDT --- BuildRequires: python-elixir is needed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:40:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:40:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191840.n4JIePK4020879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-19 14:40:24 EDT --- Thank you for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jconv Short Description: Jack Convolution Engine Owners: oget nando Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:41:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191841.n4JIfNMw023096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-19 14:41:23 EDT --- ... and a BuildRequires: python-sqlalchemy, python-coverage, python-nose, python-repoze.who Look at tests_require= in setup.py. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:42:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:42:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191842.n4JIg3GG023224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 14:42:02 EDT --- libmemcached-0.29-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.29-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191848.n4JImg2Y023064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-19 14:48:40 EDT --- Does that now mean, that I can/should/must revert my %{_initrddir} usage? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: drbdlinks Short Description: A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191856.n4JIugVQ025370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-19 14:56:41 EDT --- Please update this to 1.0rc1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:01:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:01:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191901.n4JJ1QIp026937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-19 15:01:25 EDT --- You should convert to %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d in the futere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 18:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 14:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191859.n4JIxdH5027821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #70 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-19 14:59:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #67) > I just compiled this on my fedora 11 system and I'd like to mention 3 things. I > guess this package is being targeted for f10 but f11 is just about here . 8 > days. > > 1. First is that mumble-overlay complains "32-bit libmumble.so.1 not found in" > . To fix this I did a ln -s /usr/lib/libmumble.so.1 > /usr/lib/mumble/libmumble.so.1 . > Fixed. > 2. In plugins shouldn't 'link' plugin be in there by default because it doesn't > show up. Settings | Plugins is empty. No solution for this. Tried many different configurations, made some symlinks and still same problem. Looks like mumble cant find liblink.so. btw, works fine if you start mumble from BUILD directory. Suggestions are welcome. > > 3. In Settings | Shortcuts. There aren't any shortcut entries visible. The only > one there is push to talk because that one was set with the audio wizard. Other > than that the defaults are not there. Even clicking 'restore defaults' does > nothing. > > I'm very happy about this package making it into the repo. Fixed scriptlets pointed by Mamoru. Comment #67 To enable Ice I would have to change murmur.ini and php.ini. After that I would have to make another sub-package with php and perl scripts for registering users. This is no problem(except changing php and murmur ini's) but it would be stupid(from my point of view) to do all of this for half complete scripts. I would suggest we wait for complete solution for administering murmur server before doing any of these. One is already out (http://hiddenservers.org/murmurcp) but its license is not compatible with Fedora. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:08:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:08:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191908.n4JJ8Vvc030756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191908.n4JJ8WEr030786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501566 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] New: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-who-friendlyform.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11.src.rpm Description: repoze.who-friendlyform is a repoze.who plugin which provides a collection of developer-friendly form plugins. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:16:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:16:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191916.n4JJGmVe031611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 15:16:45 EDT --- lmms-0.4.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lmms-0.4.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191921.n4JJLAAP002854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-19 15:21:08 EDT --- Pretty simple and clean package. Here is full review: + rpmlint output clean + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + File, containing the text of the licenses for the package is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture (x86_64). + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + No need to deal with locales. + Does not contain shared libraries. + The package does not designed to be relocatable. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + A package does not list a file more than once in the spec %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + Does not contain large documentation files. + Includes only doc files in %doc. + No headers. + No static libraries. + The package does not contain pkgconfig(.pc) files. + The package does not contain library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1). + No devel packages. + The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. + Does not contain GUI applications. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. + All filenames in the package are valid UTF-8. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] New: Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 Summary: Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at traylen.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/ndoutils-rpm/ndoutils.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/ndoutils-rpm/ndoutils-1.4b7-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: The NDOUTILS addon is designed to store all configuration and event data from Nagios in a database. This is my first package for Fedora and as such I require a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191947.n4JJlkEr011427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-19 15:47:45 EDT --- what's your fedora username in FAS[1] ? [1] - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191946.n4JJk2Ut010616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191945.n4JJjEhd010234@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-19 15:45:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: b43-tools Short Description: Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] New: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-quickstart.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin allows you to take advantage of a rather simple, and usual, authentication and authorization setup, in which the users? data, the groups and the permissions used in the application are all stored in a SQLAlchemy or Elixir-managed database. Put simply, it configures repoze.who and repoze.what in one go so that you can have an authentication and authorization system working quickly ? hence the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:49:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191949.n4JJn6tW010065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191949.n4JJn5BH010043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191949.n4JJn7sS010084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191949.n4JJn3Mx010014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191949.n4JJn10a009976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191948.n4JJmxc2009944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |501566, 476789, 479021, | |479020, 468227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191949.n4JJne16011872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #2 from david.hannequin at gmail.com 2009-05-19 15:49:39 EDT --- Hello, I fix build require and i sent an email to the author of the module to seek clarification on the license. I have read http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361022 but don't understand. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 19:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 15:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905191959.n4JJx2Mi014975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-19 15:59:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Hello, > > I fix build require and i sent an email to the author of the module to seek > clarification on the license. OK, Please upload a new release for review. > I have read http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1361022 > but don't understand. The issue is, that the 'make chech' command in the %check stanza need a running X-Server. Unfortunately on a build server we don't have a GUI.To selve this issue it may be nice, if you remove the %check stanza completely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 20:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192012.n4JKCOvO017320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #4 from david.hannequin at gmail.com 2009-05-19 16:12:23 EDT --- Sorry i have read build.log and it need X screen. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-Stderr/perl-Tk-Stderr.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-Stderr/perl-Tk-Stderr-1.2-4.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 20:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192014.n4JKE5cL019977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #24 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-19 16:14:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > For 0.8.12-3: > > * License > * Directory ownership issue > - This package should own the directory %_datadir/%name. I resolved this: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SPECS/me-tv.spec http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora10/SRPMS/me-tv-0.8.12-4.fc10.src.rpm I think that it is all right now. > > ! Note that I cannot test this application because I don't have > the necessary device. My friend tested Koji build and he said that works perfectly with his DVB stick. I can put build on Bodhi to testing for the first time if you think that is will be wise. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 20:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192015.n4JKFOmJ018449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-05-19 16:15:22 EDT --- Hi, it's stevetraylen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 20:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192030.n4JKU5YA023763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098 --- Comment #13 from Dan Young 2009-05-19 16:30:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I reported this as a bug to upstream here: > http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1120 GPL boilerplate in setup.py has been fixed upstream: http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=1120#c1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 20:58:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:58:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192058.n4JKwUgI001117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #3 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-19 16:58:29 EDT --- if you want to speed up the process, please submit a koji scratch build. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Install_the_Client_Tools_.28Koji.29 someone will sponsor you and review your package as soon as possible. also take a look in packaging guidelines https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 21:00:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:00:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192100.n4JL0ABr002830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-19 17:00:09 EDT --- 1] as i take a deeply look, do you even need doc/OFL.txt? it contains license for fonts, which are removed during %prep. So there is no reason to keep it, at least from my point of view. Or is this file license for anything else? 2] Koji build ok on all platforms. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364506 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 21:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192109.n4JL9Ev9004342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 17:09:11 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 21:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192111.n4JLB6v2005081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-19 17:11:05 EDT --- thx Jussi New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jargs Short Description: Java command line option parsing suite Owners: guidograzioli Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 21:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192124.n4JLO70f009542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #3 from Federico Hernandez 2009-05-19 17:24:06 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ultrafredde.com/projects/task-1.7.0-2.fc10.src.rpm Hallo Jochen! Vielen Dank f?r die Review. I have now changed the spec file according to your suggestions - from the Changelog section: * Tue May 19 2009 Federico Hernandez - 1.7.0-2 - Changed license to GPLv2+ and removed Requires macro. - See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 New rpmlint runs showed now error nor warnings. /Federico -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 21:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192129.n4JLT9xX009966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #15 from Mat Booth 2009-05-19 17:29:08 EDT --- Sorry for the silence on this front, busy couple of weeks. It's no bother calling the %setup macro more than once (most useful for packages with multiple source archives). See: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html I've better documented the source files and patches and added some line continuations: Spec URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg.spec SRPM URL: http://mbooth.fedorapeople.org/reviews/lpg-2.0.16-2.fc10.src.rpm --- Also, I'm not sure what you're see with regards to debuginfo but in my local build (on F10) I see this come out just before it starts processing dependencies: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/mbooth/rpmbuild/BUILD/lpg-1.1.0 extracting debug info from /home/mbooth/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/lpg-2.0.16-1.fc10.i386/usr/bin/lpg 2941 blocks And it's definitely building a debuginfo package with some stuff inside. However, I wouldn't know a useful debuginfo package if it came up and shook my hand; it's not something I know very much about. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 21:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192157.n4JLv3AW017546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Rolf Fokkens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rolf.fokkens at wanadoo.nl --- Comment #32 from Rolf Fokkens 2009-05-19 17:57:00 EDT --- I needed undionly.kpxe to make a server do an iSCSI boot, as described in http://www.etherboot.org/wiki/pxechaining. AFAIK this file isn't part if the compiled packages, I took it from the rpmbuild after building the binary packages from sources. I'd suggest to include the undionly.kpxe in one of the binary packages if it actually isn't in one of them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 22:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192228.n4JMS4XZ023833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #33 from Matt Domsch 2009-05-19 18:28:01 EDT --- Thanks for catching that Rolf. Building in koji now, with undionly.kpxe now included in the -bootimgs subpackage. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364843 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 23:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192314.n4JNERfp032570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #57 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-05-19 19:14:24 EDT --- I am using links compiled with NSS for some time and I got connection error to this server: https://lug.wsu.edu/ NSS-compiled Links works for other https servers (like this bugzilla or mail at centrum.cz), but on that one it doesn't. Definitely, the transition won't be so easy... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 23:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192315.n4JNFSjS002975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #58 from Mikulas Patocka 2009-05-19 19:15:26 EDT --- (OpenSSL Links connects to https://lug.wsu.edu/ just fine) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 23:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192322.n4JNM7tj004034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-19 19:22:06 EDT --- I've renamed the code in git to "squeal". Hope to put together an updated tarball/RPM for review shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 23:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192326.n4JNQ3hS002096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #10 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-19 19:26:03 EDT --- and I've requested a rename of the Fedora Hosted project; see https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1409 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 19 23:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 19:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905192341.n4JNfLef006967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 19:41:18 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200024.n4K0OjcS014198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:24:43 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200025.n4K0PW6W014690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:25:30 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:33:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:33:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200033.n4K0XItN016070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 20:33:16 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ibus-table-yong New Branches: F-10, F-11 Owners: cchance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488010] Review Request: ibus-table-cangjie - Cang Jie input method for ibus-table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200043.n4K0hMCk017587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010 --- Comment #41 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 20:43:20 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ibus-table-cangjie New Branches: F-10 Owners: cchance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488010] Review Request: ibus-table-cangjie - Cang Jie input method for ibus-table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200043.n4K0hiP9017656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488168] Package Review: ibus-table-wubi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200042.n4K0gso2017530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488168 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 20:42:52 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ibus-table-wubi New Branches: F-10 Owners: cchance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200044.n4K0i7AJ017742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Caius 'kaio' Chance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Caius 'kaio' Chance 2009-05-19 20:44:06 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: ibus-table-erbi New Branches: F-10 Owners: cchance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200046.n4K0k2cU016079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:47:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200047.n4K0lJv6016321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.35-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200046.n4K0kWlG016178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.4-1.fc10 |3.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200047.n4K0l5ie016280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.13.0-5.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200046.n4K0kNma018406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |matt_domsch at dell.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200047.n4K0l0Ad018519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:46:59 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:47:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200047.n4K0lE6T018569@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:47:13 EDT --- perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0n7MH019070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:49:06 EDT --- perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nCHf019109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.50-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:47:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200047.n4K0laVj018638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:47:35 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453862] Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200046.n4K0kRu5018437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:46:26 EDT --- globus-gsi-proxy-core-3.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200048.n4K0mLtn018801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:48:20 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200048.n4K0mSZ1018843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.05-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:51:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:51:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200051.n4K0pWlG018174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:51:31 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:51:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:51:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200051.n4K0pBR2018043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:51:10 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:51:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:51:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200051.n4K0pGxi018081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.17-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200052.n4K0qWKU018437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:52:31 EDT --- perl-Net-Amazon-0.50-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200052.n4K0qC5J018356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200050.n4K0oSnP017884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:50:27 EDT --- perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nKXw016968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:49:18 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nlfp017156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.9-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nOVR017015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.5-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200047.n4K0lele016533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.6-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nsbg019512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:49:53 EDT --- perl-XML-Atom-0.35-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200052.n4K0q1jP020617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.17-1.fc10 |0.17-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nfF8019363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:49:40 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200050.n4K0odFN020025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:50:38 EDT --- perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500046] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Mason - Mason View Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200051.n4K0pue4020489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500046 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:51:55 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Mason-0.17-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200050.n4K0ouvV020125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:50:56 EDT --- perl-HTML-Defang-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200051.n4K0pcu9020397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.13.0-5.fc9 |0.13.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500038] Review Request: perl-Net-Amazon - Framework for accessing amazon.com via REST In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200052.n4K0qabs020772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500038 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.50-1.fc10 |0.50-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200052.n4K0q7ej020666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:52:06 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:49:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:49:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500037] Review Request: perl-XML-Atom - Atom feed and API implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200049.n4K0nwgC019550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500037 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.35-1.fc10 |0.35-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200050.n4K0ojqu020063@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.01-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0sGAm021335@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:54:15 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499941] Review Request: perl-HTML-WikiConverter-Markdown - Convert HTML to Markdown markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200050.n4K0oXkQ019979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499941 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.05-1.fc10 |0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:51:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500036] Review Request: perl-HTML-Defang - Cleans HTML and CSS of executable contents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200051.n4K0p1PS020165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500036 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.01-1.fc10 |1.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0sKZE021370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.007-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:55:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200055.n4K0tNFD019871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:55:22 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0s0x7019165@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:53:59 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-0.04-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200055.n4K0tSfk019918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.9-2.fc10 |5.9-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200055.n4K0tCj1019716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:55:11 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0sq69019307@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:54:51 EDT --- perl-Text-Context-3.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:55:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200055.n4K0t6HY019675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.5-1.fc11 |0.6.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500039] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon - Factory class for Yahoo! and MSN emoticons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0s46l019196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500039 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.04-1.fc11 |0.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200055.n4K0t2mq019628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:55:01 EDT --- wavemon-0.6.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0sf1A021590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 20:54:41 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish-0.007-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499067] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Eksblowfish - Eksblowfish block cipher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0sjvt021745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499067 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.007-1.fc10 |0.007-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499066] Review Request: perl-Text-Context - Handle highlighting search result context snippets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200054.n4K0subR021993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499066 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.6-1.fc10 |3.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 00:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 20:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498805] Review Request: wavemon - Ncurses-based monitoring application for wireless network devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200055.n4K0tGLR022364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498805 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.5-1.fc9 |0.6.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 01:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200124.n4K1Oa0T025800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 arthurguru changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from arthurguru 2009-05-19 21:24:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xmlfy Short Description: Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format Owners: arthurguru Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: lkundrak hpejakle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 02:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 22:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200254.n4K2sR6T016584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #16 from Ed Brand 2009-05-19 22:54:25 EDT --- SRPM and spec aval at: https://sourceforge.net/project/platformdownload.php?group_id=253689 -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 03:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200324.n4K3OuQh019172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 23:24:55 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 03:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200324.n4K3OpFO019131@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 23:24:50 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 03:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200345.n4K3j8Yt023261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 23:45:07 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 03:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200345.n4K3jDls023306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 23:45:13 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 03:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200345.n4K3jqCb026425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 23:45:51 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 03:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 23:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200345.n4K3juxq026462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-19 23:45:56 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235679] Review Request: weechat - Portable, fast, light and extensible IRC client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200532.n4K5WSfY013348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235679 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:32:27 EDT --- ok. cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200535.n4K5ZLmX011203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 467239 depends on bug 467237, which changed state. Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:35:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488168] Package Review: ibus-table-wubi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200537.n4K5bjX7014586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488168 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:37:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:38:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:38:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488173] Package Review: ibus-table-erbi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200538.n4K5cCUc014654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488173 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:38:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200539.n4K5dTFa014801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:39:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488010] Review Request: ibus-table-cangjie - Cang Jie input method for ibus-table. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200537.n4K5bATQ014488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488010 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #42 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:37:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:44:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:44:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495801] Review Request: json - JavaScript Object Notation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200544.n4K5i4V6015898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495801 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:44:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:42:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:42:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200542.n4K5gKLw015688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:42:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:45:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:45:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200545.n4K5jZX2013265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:45:34 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496757] Package Review: ibus-table-yong In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200544.n4K5ipQ7012766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496757 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:44:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:46:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200546.n4K5kSMn016618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:46:27 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200548.n4K5motF016872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-20 01:48:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200551.n4K5pH6h014325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #5 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-05-20 01:51:16 EDT --- You're right, i did not pay attention to the content of the OFL.txt file, but it indeed seems font related only. I've removed it, here's the updated links : SRPM : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC : http://rpms.ulysses.fr/SPECS/tuxmath.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200558.n4K5wV9e018683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen 2009-05-20 01:58:30 EDT --- Yes scratch build done and I hope I've gone through the relavent guidelines. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1364519 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 05:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 01:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200557.n4K5vRY1018542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #7 from Yang Yong 2009-05-20 01:57:25 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath-1.0-1.3.jpp6.src.rpm POM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath-1.0.pom overholt, please review these files if necessary, I have got the notification email from accounts at fedoraproject.org, that informed me that you have sponsored me, thanks :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 06:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470703] Review Request: links - text mode browser with graphics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200600.n4K601lM015702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470703 --- Comment #59 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-20 01:59:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #57) > I am using links compiled with NSS for some time and I got connection error to > this server: https://lug.wsu.edu/ May I dare to ask how does this relate to a closed review request? (And no, this question doesn't need an answer here.) If there's an issue that bothers you, please open a separate bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 06:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200617.n4K6H38j018988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 02:17:03 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 06:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200616.n4K6G9h6018881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 02:16:08 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 06:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200617.n4K6HjY2019108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 02:17:44 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jconv-0.8.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 06:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 02:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200632.n4K6WGUK022083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-20 02:32:15 EDT --- Hi David, I couldn't see you in packager cvs group, is this your first package for fedora? 1] how do you get Source0,Source1,Source2? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 2] latest version is 0.8.4, wouldn't be better to have this version packaged? 3] use %{__cp} -p to preserver timestamps, better would be not to use %{__cp} at all, you are doing a lot of chmods later, couldn't you use install? Most of chmods are related to 5] 4] vendor/rails contains ruby library files: which have licensing: MIT for actionmailer, actionpack, activerecord, activeresource, activesupport, GPLv2 for activemodel 5] this libraries are present as packages in fedora, so why do you need to package it by yourself? put that into requirements. Except activemodel for which I couldn't see any package. So create package for activemodel library ( use http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 07:55:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 03:55:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501655] New: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501655 Summary: Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: msuchy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 452450 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-docs/spacewalk-proxy-docs.spec SRPM: http://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/spacewalk-proxy-docs/spacewalk-proxy-docs-0.6.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package includes the installation/configuration guide, and whitepaper in support of an Spacewalk Proxy Server. Also included are the Client Configuration, Channel Management, and Enterprise User Reference guides. rpmlint is silent Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1365447 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 07:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 03:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501655] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200757.n4K7vU2R011138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501655 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |spacewalk-proxy-docs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 08:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 04:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501655] Review Request: spacewalk-proxy-docs - Spacewalk Proxy Server documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200800.n4K80J3h012042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501655 Miroslav Suchy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |spacewalk-proxy-docs |spacewalk-proxy-docs - | |Spacewalk Proxy Server | |documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 08:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 04:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200829.n4K8TYC1015444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 04:29:32 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 08:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 04:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200829.n4K8TlxG015499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 04:29:46 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 08:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 04:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200829.n4K8TfDT018560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 04:29:39 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 08:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 04:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501660] New: Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501660 Summary: Review Request: mrepo - A tool to set up a yum/apt mirror from various sources Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mrepo.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/mrepo-0.8.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/mrepo/ Description: mrepo builds a local Apt/Yum RPM repository from local ISO files, downloaded updates and extra packages from RHN and 3rd party repositories. It can download all updates and extras automatically, creates the repository structure and meta-data, enables HTTP access to the repository and creates a directory-structure for remote network installations using PXE/TFTP. mrepo supports ftp, http, sftp, rsync, rhn and other download methods. With mrepo, you can enable your laptop or a local server to provide updates for the whole network and provide the proper files to allow installations via the network. rpmlint output: mrepo.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided yam mrepo.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/mrepo.conf 0600 mrepo.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-var mrepo mrepo.noarch: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mrepo $prog 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. These should all be OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 08:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 04:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200845.n4K8j6Da018478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-20 04:45:05 EDT --- ping?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 09:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 05:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200928.n4K9SckC028098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 05:28:38 EDT --- jargs-1.0-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jargs-1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 09:28:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 05:28:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905200928.n4K9SXAn028067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 05:28:32 EDT --- jargs-1.0-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/jargs-1.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201000.n4KA0tv8005299@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 --- Comment #6 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-20 06:00:53 EDT --- Check out older redhat-rpm-config packages' macros file, e.g. in F8, to see the old definition where it copied files as Karsten says. You can use "rpm --eval %configure", btw. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226050] Merge Review: libtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201009.n4KA96xj006982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226050 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-20 06:09:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Check out older redhat-rpm-config packages' macros file, e.g. in F8, to see the > old definition where it copied files as Karsten says. OK, but that's no problem anymore since rawhide is F12 :) > You can use "rpm --eval %configure", btw. Duh, true. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201033.n4KAX2fu009728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201033.n4KAX1b3009679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |487044 Bug 496433 depends on bug 477750, which changed state. Bug 477750 Summary: Review Request: Ogmtools - Tools for Ogg media streams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477750 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 10:58:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 06:58:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201058.n4KAwZC6017543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-20 06:58:33 EDT --- Hint. It's ok to wrote '(#501498)' as an abbrevious in the changelog. Because you package look good. I will APPRROVED you. You can create a FAS account and done the cla. Please request membership in the packagers group, so I can sponsor you. Unfortunately, I'm away until sunday. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 12:01:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:01:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201201.n4KC1wSX001638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-20 08:01:54 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-zfstream.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Everything's okay, no further changes required ====================================================== The package mingw32-zfstream is APPROVED by epienbro ====================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 12:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201209.n4KC9kdZ001474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #5 from Federico Hernandez 2009-05-20 08:09:45 EDT --- THX for the changelog abbreviation hint. FAS account and cla are done and ready. I have requested now requested membership in the packagers group. Gr?sse Federico -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 12:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 08:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201222.n4KCMtlN005531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-20 08:22:52 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-zfstream Short Description: MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 13:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201327.n4KDRwJT028743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 david.hannequin at gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #6 from david.hannequin at gmail.com 2009-05-20 09:27:57 EDT --- Hello, Yes, it's my first package for Fedora. I have read your comment and i correct spec file. Thank for your comment. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 13:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201343.n4KDhdD5001500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-05-20 09:43:37 EDT --- Friendly ping to Yaakov ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 13:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 09:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201343.n4KDhYEn001442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) AssignedTo|jan.klepek at hp.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-20 09:43:32 EDT --- Hi David, In that case, you need to get sponsored first. You should read following link for more information about packaging and becoming packager. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Please incorporate all my last comments and give us link to updated specfile and SRPM when you will have them ready. I will help you with unofficial review on this package, final review needs to be done by person who will sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 14:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201402.n4KE2TBP006327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-20 10:02:27 EDT --- The _lock_file issue has been reported upstream by Ryan McDougall (sempuki) @ https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2794382&group_id=2435&atid=102435 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 15:59:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:59:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201559.n4KFxHA2018642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-20 11:59:15 EDT --- Now approving. -------------------------------------------------- This package (me-tv) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 16:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201604.n4KG480a020590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 12:04:07 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 16:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201603.n4KG3hTF020488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 12:03:42 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 15:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 11:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201550.n4KFolQZ014173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #71 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-20 11:50:42 EDT --- For -13: - Well, I don't know why I didn't notice this, however these Requires -------------------------------------------------------- 24 Requires(pre): shadow-utils 25 Requires(post): chkconfig 26 Requires(preun): chkconfig, initscripts 27 Requires(postun): initscripts -------------------------------------------------------- should all be moved to "murmur" subpackage and should not be in "mumble" main package. Please fix above when importing this package into Fedora CVS. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (mumble) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 16:15:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:15:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201615.n4KGFNTG022369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-05-20 12:15:21 EDT --- imo, preserving historical/old changelog is ok, preferred actually, to provide history and attribution. (Provided it's not huge and doesn't impact pkg size anyway). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 16:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201642.n4KGgDLo000820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #12 from Balaji G 2009-05-20 12:42:12 EDT --- Hi Jochen Thank you so much for your extensive review.I have addressed the review comments and have placed the package and the spec file at the following location for your review. http://balajig8.fedorapeople.org/packages/ascii/ Thanks, Cheers, Balaji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 16:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201646.n4KGkXwg032045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-20 12:46:31 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/purple-gfire-0.8.1/purple-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/purple-gfire-0.8.1/purple-gfire-0.8.1-1.fc10.src.rpm * Wed May 20 2009 Andreas Osowski - 0.8.1-1 - New upstream version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 16:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495942] Review Request: guimup - A GTKmm based drag-&-drop oriented client for MPD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201648.n4KGmJvF032513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495942 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-20 12:48:17 EDT --- It finally built successfully on F11 and upwards thanks to Milos Jakubicek. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 17:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201740.n4KHerEd015349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #72 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-20 13:40:51 EDT --- Moved Requires to murmur subpackage. SPEC and SRPM are on the same links as above. FAS: "igjurisk" (without quotes). I applied for packagers group. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 17:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201741.n4KHfT6W015479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-20 13:41:27 EDT --- Yeah... can you add the email conversations with upstream(s) where they clarify licensing as a "README.Licensing" in the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 17:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201743.n4KHhNH1019488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |steved at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-20 13:43:21 EDT --- The SunRPC licensing is now replaced entirely by the BSD license, with explicit permission from Sun. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 17:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201749.n4KHnHVp021488@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #73 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-20 13:49:16 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 17:57:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 13:57:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201757.n4KHvAVL024126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201814.n4KIENGc025038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201813.n4KIDv5K024927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #74 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-20 14:13:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mumble Short Description: Voice chat software primarily intended for use while gaming Owners: igjurisk Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201818.n4KIIkrl030313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #75 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-20 14:18:45 EDT --- Do I have to download new cert on FAS because my status changed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: purple-gfire - Xfire plugin for libpurple In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201823.n4KINXTH028182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-20 14:23:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This doesn't seem to me to be a pidgin plugin, more like a purple plugin. Thus > the name should be purple-gfire and BuildRequires: libpurple-devel. Hmm, I no longer agree with myself :D This is after all a pidgin plugin, at least the home page clearly says so. So the name should be after all pidgin-xfire. Sorry for the hassle. Now: - You should Requires: libpurple explicitly for dir ownership, even though this should be automatically picked up by rpm as a lib dependency. Also, please make a comment about the dir ownership section of Requires, so that you/other people will not remove it without knowing why it's there. - Please don't use macros when not necessary (%{__chmod} is just chmod). - Change %{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/* %{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/scripts/server_detection/* to %{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/ as this will own the directory (necessary) and everything in it. Now the package doesn't own the directory /usr/share/purple/gfire and you are listing stuff twice: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/4097.py warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/4097.pyc warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/4097.pyo warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/purple/gfire/scripts/server_detection/tools - You can fit the make install -stuff into one line. - Description uses some odd characters. ? should be ' and ? should be ". - License is GPLv3+ not GPLv2+. - BR: libpurple-devel is redundant, it's already pulled in by pidgin-devel. So is glib2-devel, which is pulled in by pidgin-devel -> gtk2-devel. - What is the line sed -i -e '/#\!/d' %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/scripts/server_detection/4097.py for? I assume it removes a shebang in the python file. Please, add a comment! *** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - Don't use %{__chmod} for chmod. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. NEEDSWORK - Should be named pidgin-xfire (yes, my mistake) :) MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK - Remember to rename this back too. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSFIX - License is GPLv3+ not GPLv2+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - Should Requires: libpurple explicitly. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK - Use %{_datadir}/purple/%{srcname}/ to own everything you should. MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201826.n4KIQLRN000526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #76 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-20 14:26:19 EDT --- As far as I know it is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201841.n4KIf14I005149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 14:41:00 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 18:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 14:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201856.n4KIuTJX006913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 14:56:29 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 19:03:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:03:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201903.n4KJ3Xfk010149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Thomas Moschny changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas.moschny at gmx.de --- Comment #1 from Thomas Moschny 2009-05-20 15:03:32 EDT --- Source0 gives a 404 error, should be http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libidn/libidn-%{version}.tar.gz instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 19:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201944.n4KJiJj7023017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |purple-gfire - Xfire plugin |pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin |for libpurple |for Pidgin --- Comment #5 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-20 15:44:18 EDT --- I hope everything is fixed now, I didn't notice upstream's license change. When adding Requires: libpurple, rpmlint says E: explicit-lib-dependency libpurple so I dropped that tag again... RPM is recognizing it by itself. Besides, Requires: pidgin automatically pulls in libpurple. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 19:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201956.n4KJuw5Z026659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 15:56:57 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 19:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201957.n4KJv3vt029953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 15:57:02 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 19:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201956.n4KJurnA029888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 15:56:51 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 19:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 15:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905201959.n4KJxmIu027379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |501812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202004.n4KK48uc031854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202003.n4KK3sDO031783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #26 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-20 16:03:52 EDT --- Thanks for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: me-tv Short Description: GNOME desktop application for watching digital television Owners: grof Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202022.n4KKM98G004743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:22:08 EDT --- I wrote it based on spot's comment: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246#c8 DO you think that was not meant for the whole plexus, but just for plexus-classworlds? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202025.n4KKPOpG005814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:25:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dumbster Short Description: Fake SMTP Server Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202034.n4KKY1mv004951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 --- Comment #9 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:34:00 EDT --- Yes, I've got the 2.0 from the initial comment from Andrew. Change that to 1.1 would be easy. But there is no point as we do not have a resolution w.r.t. to that small file with the "LICENSE" in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:39:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:39:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202039.n4KKdbtZ009673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:39:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: directory-naming Short Description: Directory Naming Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202038.n4KKcXWE006422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 --- Comment #5 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:38:32 EDT --- The release tag has %{_dist} this is just a srpm created for review outside the build system, Koji will fill it with the right value. Note that during the bootstrap, intermediate (non-final) versions may have a weird release tag but that will be discarded with the rebuilds. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202041.n4KKfuEG007699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #6 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-20 16:41:55 EDT --- - release is 2 but in last changelog entry its 1. - remove INSTALL from %doc. You are making installation so other users have no need to look at it. Other than that don't see any other problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202041.n4KKfPPU007559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:41:24 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jakarta-commons-jxpath Short Description: Simple XPath interpreter Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202044.n4KKi8na010912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:44:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: easymock Short Description: Easy mock objects Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202042.n4KKgocF008034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:42:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: jakarta-commons-configuration Short Description: Commons Configuration Package Owners: fnasser, dbhole Branches: devel InitialCC: jkeating -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202047.n4KKld66009414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |470293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202047.n4KKlcHf009378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Matt Domsch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |468287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202056.n4KKuX6u012247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #1 from Matt Domsch 2009-05-20 16:56:32 EDT --- fails to build on Fedora 10 * sblim-cmpi-base libraries have wrong permission (#501812) * other failure I haven't diagnosed (see below) Missing dependency on sblim-testsuite. Includes it's own schema file, instead of using the cim-schema package (#468287). build failure: it's trying to link libOSBase_CommonNetwork.a _before_ it has generated it. gcc -shared .libs/cmpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.o .libs/cmpiOSBase_EthernetPort.o -lOSBase_CommonNetwork -m64 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,libcmpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.so -o .libs/libc mpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.so /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lOSBase_CommonNetwork collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[1]: *** [libcmpiOSBase_EthernetPortProvider.la] Error 1 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... (cd .libs && rm -f libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0 && ln -s libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0.0.0 libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0) (cd .libs && rm -f libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so && ln -s libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so.0.0.0 libOSBase_CommonNetwork.so) ar cru .libs/libOSBase_CommonNetwork.a OSBase_CommonNetwork.o ranlib .libs/libOSBase_CommonNetwork.a creating libOSBase_CommonNetwork.la -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202058.n4KKwYID015462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #2 from Matt Domsch 2009-05-20 16:58:33 EDT --- removing the %{?_smp_mflags} from the make resolves the build problem, meaning it's a simple parallel build dependency failure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202057.n4KKvdQC015236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 16:57:38 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven2-plugin-shade.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven2-plugin-shade-1.0-4.jpp6.src.rpm have the requested fixes. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 20:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 16:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202059.n4KKxZXR012937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 --- Comment #3 from Matt Domsch 2009-05-20 16:59:34 EDT --- $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/sblim-cmpi-network-* sblim-cmpi-network-debuginfo.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/lib/debug 0775 sblim-cmpi-network-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation sblim-cmpi-network-test.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. now that it builds I can do a more formal review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202105.n4KL5Xdd015171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 17:05:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-doxia-sitetools-1.0-0.1.a10.3.jpp6.src.rpm Have the revised license. Thanks for the pre-review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:10:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:10:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202110.n4KLA48D016517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 17:10:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-plugin-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-plugin-tools-2.1-3.jpp6.src.rpm Have the fixes. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500261] Pre-Review Request: maven2-plugin-shade - Maven Shade Plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202118.n4KLIioZ019845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500261 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-20 17:18:43 EDT --- The package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500267] Pre-Review Request: maven-doxia-sitetools - Content generation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202120.n4KLKjaF020775@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500267 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-20 17:20:44 EDT --- Good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500268] Pre-Review Request: maven-plugin-tools - Maven Plugin Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202120.n4KLK7Wm022499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500268 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-20 17:20:05 EDT --- Good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202126.n4KLQGPu024518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 17:26:15 EDT --- +- Fix license +- Fix instructions to generate source tar ball +- Refresh source tar ball +- Better description Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-embedder.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-embedder-2.0.4-4.jpp6.src.rpm Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202126.n4KLQ8Ti024452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-20 17:26:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I hope everything is fixed now, I didn't notice upstream's license change. > When adding Requires: libpurple, rpmlint says E: explicit-lib-dependency > libpurple > so I dropped that tag again... RPM is recognizing it by itself. Besides, > Requires: pidgin automatically pulls in libpurple. Oh, sometimes you don't have to care about rpmlint's warnings since it does produce some false positives; this is one very common type of them. Due to the dir ownership issue it IS wanted that libpurple is explicitly required; the rpmlint warning can be ignored. I don't have an xfire account, so I can't test this. From a packaging point of view the package looks good, though. APPROVED PS. A final nitpick: I'd use %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/%{srcname}.png instead of %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/%{srcname}* since thus one sees straight away what kind of stuff in is in those directories. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202130.n4KLU8uv025696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #19 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-20 17:30:05 EDT --- Again, is this still on the agenda? If so, I'll do the review. Otherwise, I'm pretty interested in getting iTALC packaged for Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202137.n4KLbNG1025537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 17:37:22 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-archiver.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-archiver-2.2-1.jpp6.src.rpm has the license fixed. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:38:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:38:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500269] Pre-Review Request: maven-embedder - Maven Embedder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202138.n4KLcwrm025870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500269 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-20 17:38:57 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:42:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:42:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202142.n4KLg0P1026620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Fernando Nasser changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Fernando Nasser 2009-05-20 17:41:59 EDT --- Spec URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-enforcer-rule-api.spec SRPM URL: http://people.fedoraproject.org/~fnasser/maven-enforcer-rule-api-1.0-0.1.a2.1.4.jpp6.src.rpm License fixed. Thanks for the pre-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202153.n4KLrqxo031155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500271] Pre-Review Request: maven-archiver - Maven Archiver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202156.n4KLuuG8030059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500271 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-20 17:56:55 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 21:57:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 17:57:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500270] Pre-Review Request: maven-enforcer-rule-api - Generic interfaces needed by maven-enforcer-plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202157.n4KLvtTQ032061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500270 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-20 17:57:54 EDT --- Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 22:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501831] New: Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Summary: Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmalcolm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-testosterone.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-testosterone-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Description: Testosterone is a curses-based interface for running python tests written with the PyUnit testing framework (aka unittest in the standard library). Scratch build in Koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1367313 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 22:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202210.n4KMANOt002237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #1 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-20 18:10:22 EDT --- I'll take this one. # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. YES # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. YES # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. YES # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. YES # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. YES # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. YES # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. YES # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. YES # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. YES # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. YES # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. YES # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. YES # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. YES # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. YES # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. YES # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. YES # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. YES # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. YES # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. NO # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. N/A # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. YES Only blocker is desktop file. Its GUI application but no desktop file is installed nor you explained in spec why not. Fix that and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 22:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202223.n4KMNuN6004758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #2 from leigh scott 2009-05-20 18:23:55 EDT --- Ok, I will create a desktop file, is it ok to add a generic mixer icon as well? > > Only blocker is desktop file. Its GUI application but no desktop file is > installed nor you explained in spec why not. Fix that and I'll approve it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 22:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468287] Review Request: cim-schema - Common Information Model (CIM) Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202228.n4KMSr5u005027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468287 --- Comment #13 from Matt Domsch 2009-05-20 18:28:51 EDT --- updated to latest schemas, and addressed the License: tag and %{_datadir} notes above. Spec URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/cim-schema/cim-schema.spec SRPM URL: http://domsch.com/linux/fedora/cim-schema/cim-schema-2.21.0-1.src.rpm $ rpmlint SPECS/cim-schema.spec SRPMS/cim-schema-2.21.0-1.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/cim-schema-* 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 22:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 18:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202239.n4KMdgxs007896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #3 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-20 18:39:41 EDT --- There is nothing in wiki related to no icons in desktop file so I assume its ok to use generic one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:52:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:52:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202352.n4KNqWrp019741@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:52:30 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5228 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNs36W020905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.3-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202353.n4KNrISC020813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:53:17 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-4942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202352.n4KNqdCj020545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:52:38 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-XML-Feed'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202356.n4KNu5Vj020927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 |0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202353.n4KNrxWG020089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:53:58 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNstVH020298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:54:54 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202355.n4KNt04h020330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202355.n4KNtDNm020675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.5.1-2.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202355.n4KNtKvK020784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:55:19 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-4936 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202357.n4KNvQAi021183@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:57:24 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5256 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNsKcN020191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:54:19 EDT --- libmemcached-0.29-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmemcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNsFdp020153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:54:13 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jconv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5235 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNscBj020257@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:54:37 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update b43-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202357.n4KNv98F022069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:57:08 EDT --- jargs-1.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:56:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202356.n4KNu0be021746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:55:59 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202355.n4KNt9Rg021573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:55:08 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202357.n4KNvETn022102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-5.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:58:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:58:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202358.n4KNwlcB022482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:58:46 EDT --- jargs-1.0-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202357.n4KNv1pJ022036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:57:00 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jconv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5253 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202359.n4KNxPP3022771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:59:24 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5260 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNsp6K021229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:54:49 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update gpxe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202359.n4KNxJfx022639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:59:18 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update jack_capture'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-4969 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202354.n4KNsjju021146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:54:44 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-XML-Feed'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5240 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202355.n4KNtrIl021708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:55:52 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5247 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202358.n4KNwwN6022537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:58:57 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5258 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210001.n4L01Ovb022798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:01:24 EDT --- creox-0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499409] Review Request: jargs - Java command line option parsing suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202358.n4KNwp8m021836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499409 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-5.fc11 |1.0-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210001.n4L011xk022736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:01:00 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210002.n4L021Rq022925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:02:00 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L00sx8022673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.3-1.fc9 |0.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202359.n4KNxvpp022093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:59:55 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update b43-tools'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5262 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L00jxj022634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:00:44 EDT --- libmemcached-0.29-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmemcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5268 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 20 23:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 19:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905202359.n4KNxoTo022032@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 19:59:49 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5261 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L00cUY022594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:00:37 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5267 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L00OoB023714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:00:23 EDT --- kde-plasma-stasks-0.5.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L00nsl023806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:00:48 EDT --- kde-plasma-yawp-0.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:02:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:02:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210002.n4L026Px024190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.1-2.fc10 |0.5.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497035] Review Request: creox - Real-time Sound Processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210001.n4L01Tmf024119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497035 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc9 |0.2.2-0.2.rc2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499531] Review Request: kde-plasma-yawp - Yet Another Weather Plasmoid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210001.n4L016nu023999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499531 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.3-1.fc10 |0.2.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498306] Review Request: kde-plasma-stasks - Alternate Task-Switcher plasma applet In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L00SnZ023750@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.5.1-2.fc9 |0.5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L002o6023613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:00:01 EDT --- globus-gssapi-gsi-5.9-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467237] Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210000.n4L0072r023661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.9-2.fc9 |5.9-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:02:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:02:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210002.n4L02MxP024263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-20 20:02:22 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update jconv'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5276 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210022.n4L0MKKp026644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2009-05-20 20:22:20 EDT --- I will correct the licence next build, it should be GPLv3+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 00:20:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:20:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210020.n4L0KFhX027475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #4 from leigh scott 2009-05-20 20:20:14 EDT --- OK, I found this new gmixer sourcecode at launchpad, it isn't the same package but looks promising. It didn't have a desktop file either, what do you think of the new gmixer code ? Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/2/gmixer.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/2/gmixer-1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint returns this rpmlint -vi /home/leigh/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/gmixer-1.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm gmixer.x86_64: I: checking gmixer.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-xlib You must let rpm find the library dependencies by itself. Do not put unneeded explicit Requires: tags. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The package doesn't drag python-xlib as a requires so I added it to the spec file. P.S sorry for switching source code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 02:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 22:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210254.n4L2sWCj025075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-20 22:54:31 EDT --- Well I guess the submission needs updating to the latest template. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 03:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 23:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210342.n4L3gIwe001455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #16 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-05-20 23:42:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) The spec file has been improved and the rpms checked through rpmlint. There are two minor warnings: # rpmlint armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.6.11 armadillo.x86_64: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # rpmlint armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I'm not sure why there is the unstripped-binary-or-object warning. According to Comment #3 (Ralf Corsepius), "In Fedora, libs are supposed to be built unstripped (rpm strips them later)". Is this a problem worth worrying about ? New spec file and source rpm are located at: http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sourceforge.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 04:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 00:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210409.n4L494wm004745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #17 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-05-21 00:09:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > Comment #3 (Ralf Corsepius), "In Fedora, libs are supposed to be built > unstripped (rpm strips them later)". Is this a problem worth worrying about ? Generally speaking, without having checked details of the current package: Yes, it is a blocker and must be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 05:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 01:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] New: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pnemade at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/lcdf-typetools.spec SRPM URL: http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The LCDF Typetools package contains several programs for manipulating PostScript Type 1, Type 1 multiple master, and PostScript-flavored OpenType fonts. LCDF Typetools includes the mmafm and mmpfb programs, which were formerly distributed as part of a different package (mminstance) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 05:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 01:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210513.n4L5DJbG015091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #18 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-05-21 01:13:18 EDT --- OK, your debuginfo issue is caused by not passing CXXFLAGS/CFLAGS to cmake, which causes libarmadillo.so.* to be built with inappropriate CFLAGS: >From build.log: ... /usr/bin/c++ -Darmadillo_EXPORTS -fPIC -I/users/corsepiu/src/rpms/BUILD/armadillo-0.6.11/include -o CMakeFiles/armadillo.dir/src/pull_libs.o -c /users/corsepiu/src/rpms/BUILD/armadillo-0.6.11/src/pull_libs.cpp Note: All mandatory RPM_OPT_FLAGS are missing. Using %cmake instead of "cmake ..." will likely resolve your issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 07:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210736.n4L7a20p011108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-21 03:36:00 EDT --- All right, I fixed that stuff now. Spec URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.mkdir.name/packages/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-3.fc10.src.rpm * Wed May 21 2009 Andreas Osowski - 0.8.1-3 - Added Requires: libpurple - Changed the files entry for the pixmaps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 07:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210738.n4L7cEUT011451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-21 03:38:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pidgin-gfire Short Description: Xfire plugin for Pidgin Owners: th0br0 Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 07:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210743.n4L7hXVq012611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 07:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 03:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210743.n4L7hVDt012586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-21 03:43:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan Short Description: Mayan Long Count Calendar Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 08:09:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 04:09:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210809.n4L89av2018529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Paul Howarth 2009-05-21 04:09:34 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: milter-regex New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: pghmcfc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 08:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 04:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456542] Review Request: hotssh - An interface to Secure Shell, for GNOME and OpenSSH In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210841.n4L8fLkn023958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456542 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(walters at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #14 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-05-21 04:41:18 EDT --- Colin, Adel, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 08:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 04:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210842.n4L8gBA4025157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #26 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-21 04:42:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Peter, maybe we can start an Erlang SIG or something like that? Already did :) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Erlang However, there is not much lavuable info on that page (no guidelines yet). But feel free to modify it. > There are a lot of erlang packages which would be nice to have in Fedora, > and it would be easier to package them up if this is a joined effort. Agree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 08:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 04:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210842.n4L8gkGw024233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #27 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-21 04:42:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > However, there is not much lavuable info on that page (no guidelines yet). s/lavuable/valuable/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 09:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 05:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905210955.n4L9tUAt007914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #6 from leigh scott 2009-05-21 05:55:28 EDT --- Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/3/gmixer.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/3/gmixer-1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211033.n4LAXnb1014123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Bug 496718 depends on bug 492130, which changed state. Bug 492130 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 06:28:08 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 06:32:24 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211033.n4LAXnta014119@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Bug 496718 depends on bug 492130, which changed state. Bug 492130 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 06:28:08 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 06:32:24 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211046.n4LAkuDL017037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #28 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-05-21 06:46:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://dev.lshift.net/hubert/rabbitmq-server.spec SRPM URL: http://dev.lshift.net/hubert/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-1.src.rpm This release contains fixes for the problems mentioned above. Tested on koji for F-11 and EL-5 and works fine now. rpmlint is not silent but we fixed 'missing-lsb-keyword' error and the rest can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:46:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211046.n4LAkedb017004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Bug 491614 depends on bug 492130, which changed state. Bug 492130 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gtkmm24 - MinGW Windows C++ interface for GTK2 (a GUI library for X) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492130 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 06:46:38 EDT --- mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211045.n4LAji7N018134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #24 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-21 06:45:41 EDT --- tibbs: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211051.n4LApxS5019188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-21 06:51:58 EDT --- Michael: are you still reviewing this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] New: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language Alias: mingw32-tcl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl-8.5.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows C++ wrapper for the glade library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211101.n4LB1t52019652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #29 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-21 07:01:54 EDT --- Ok + md5 is correct [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum rabbitmq-server-1.5.5.tar.gz* 1dceb98bb57cd6acef90f58e96a7fce4 rabbitmq-server-1.5.5.tar.gz 1dceb98bb57cd6acef90f58e96a7fce4 rabbitmq-server-1.5.5.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + rpmlint is not silent but these messages already explained (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224#c18 ) [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/ppc/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-1.ppc.rpm rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: no-binary rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/rabbitmq 0750 rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/rabbitmq rabbitmq rabbitmq-server.ppc: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/rabbitmq 0750 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 5 warnings. [petro at Sulaco SPECS]$ Ok, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 10:59:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 06:59:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211059.n4LAxQsm018939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-21 06:59:25 EDT --- This is completely different package. Above full review doesnt count on this one. Will make new one after these few errors are fixed. Ok, lets see; -------------------------------------------------------------------- - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture - says if you are installing something to global site_packages directory use following: %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} Please change python_sitearch with python_sitelib as stated at link above. Dont forget to change all %{python_sitearch} with new one. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- - remove --vendor. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- - desktop file has Encoding. It is assumed that encoding is UTF-8 by default so that line is useless. Please remove it. -------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211104.n4LB48YQ019958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-21 07:04:07 EDT --- Description should be: MinGW Windows Tool Command Language -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211110.n4LBAMiR022996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-21 07:10:20 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211118.n4LBI10N024286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211135.n4LBZRbf026957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-21 07:35:26 EDT --- - This is a legacy font package, so Font guidelines are not valid here. - Change Requires(post): /usr/bin/mkfontscale /usr/bin/mkfontdir to Requires(post): xorg-x11-font-utils as this is the package that provides those since Fedora Core 2 (2004). - I'm not totally sure you need Requires(post): fontconfig Requires(postun): fontconfig as you already have Requires: fontconfig. Besides, this is probably automatically picked up by rpm. Doesn't hurt having them, though. - Change references to /etc to %{_sysconfdir} - Setting umask is probably not necessary as this is done by rpm. - Replace `which mkfontdir` with plain mkfontdir. - Drop %dir %{catalogue} in %files section, as $ rpm -qf /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ filesystem-2.4.19-1.fc10.i386 is already owned on every installation. - I can't find a single mention of a license in the tarball! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:46:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:46:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211146.n4LBkwUr030832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Hubert Plociniczak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #30 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-05-21 07:46:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rabbitmq-server Short Description: An AMQP server written in Erlang Owners: hubert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 11:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 07:56:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211156.n4LBueTX031943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #8 from leigh scott 2009-05-21 07:56:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > This is completely different package. Above full review doesnt count on this > one. Will make new one after these few errors are fixed. Ok, lets see; > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture - says if > you are installing something to global site_packages directory use following: > %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from > distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} > > Please change python_sitearch with python_sitelib as stated at link above. > > Dont forget to change all %{python_sitearch} with new one. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - remove --vendor. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - desktop file has Encoding. It is assumed that encoding is UTF-8 by default so > that line is useless. Please remove it. > -------------------------------------------------------------------- Ok, here's the new spec * SRPM Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/4/gmixer.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/4/gmixer-1.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 12:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211208.n4LC8CJ1003097@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Randall Berry changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Randall Berry 2009-05-21 08:08:09 EDT --- I'll take a crack at this since nobody else has. If my findings are wrong please correct them. Key: [*] Pass [x] Fail [-] Not applicable [?] Questions (see comments) [x] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] rpmlint not silent. 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 292 errors, 2557 warnings. (see attachement http://fpaste.org/paste/12523 ) [*] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [*] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . [*] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [*] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] [*] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] [*] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] [*] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] [?] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. The source URL (http://ez.no/content/download/261295/1832505/version/3/file/ezpublish-4.1.0-gpl.tar.gz) causes an error. 4.1.1 is also the current version 4.1.0 seems to be un-available. [-] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] php no binary build. [-] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] [-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [*] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/[ ] is strictly forbidden.[9] [-] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] [-] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [x] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Refer to the Guidelines for examples. Package does not own ALL directories it creates. Each directory including %{_datadir}/%{name}/ and all subdirectories therein that the package creates must be prefixed by %dir not just the one directory. [*] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [x] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Some questionable perms found by rpmlint. (see attachment) [*] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [*] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [*] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [*] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity) [*] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [-] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [-] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [-] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [x] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Requires does require a little polishing. Requires(postun): /sbin/service Requires(post): /sbin/service Requires: /bin/sh Requires: /usr/bin/env Requires: %{_sysconfdir}/cron.d Requires: libcurl should be removed. Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/Archive) Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/ConsoleTools) Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/File) Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/SystemInformation) Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/Webdav) are also not necessary. [-] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [-] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. This is described in detail in the desktop files section of the Packaging Guidelines. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [*] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [*] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [*] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 12:39:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:39:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211239.n4LCdGsj012237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-21 08:39:15 EDT --- Minor quibble, [-] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] php no binary build. What is meant here is the product RPM as opposed to SRPM, not binary executable as opposed to script. Essentially, rpmbuild -ba foo.spec must produce something in ../RPMS/*/. FYI. :) Also, for the Requires, if any of those pear packages exist in Fedora as RPMS, they should be Required. If not, and this software needs them, they need to be packaged and included in Fedora before this can be. I see that this has a blocking bug, so maybe that's going on, I didn't dig that far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 12:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 08:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211249.n4LCnAGi016705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #9 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-21 08:49:09 EDT --- Two more things: ------------------------------------------------------ in %files section change: %{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.6.egg-info to: %{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.5.egg-info Because thats the right name of the file. ------------------------------------------------------ remove %doc in files section. You have no documentation so its useless. ------------------------------------------------------ I have to go now for few hours. When I get back I'll make full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:06:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:06:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211306.n4LD6iAi022802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #19 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-21 09:06:40 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka Thank you. Your patch works so well. The koji build is excellent. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368171 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211312.n4LDCWB3023483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #10 from leigh scott 2009-05-21 09:12:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Two more things: > > ------------------------------------------------------ > in %files section change: > %{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.6.egg-info > to: > %{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.5.egg-info > > Because thats the right name of the file. > ------------------------------------------------------ > remove %doc in files section. You have no documentation so its useless. > ------------------------------------------------------ > > > > I have to go now for few hours. When I get back I'll make full review. Ok, I have made the recommended changes. >%{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.6.egg-info is correct for F11 & F12, changing it to > %{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py2.5.egg-info would be wrong as well, so I changed it to %{python_sitelib}/gmixer-1.0-py?.?.egg-info This will enable it to build with python 2.5 or 2.6 Spec: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/5/gmixer.spec SRPM: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/review/gmixer/5/gmixer-1.3-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:08:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:08:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] New: Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Summary: Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This widget provides a dynamic image that looks just like a Mac OS 9 progress bar. Packed around it are four Frames, north, south, east and west, within which you can stuff additional widgets. For example, see how Tk::Copy::Mac uses several Labels and a CollapsableFrame widget to create a reasonable facsimile of a Macintosh copy dialog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:14:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:14:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501958] New: Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 Summary: Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dakingun at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch-5.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Scotch is a software library for graph and mesh/hypergraph partitioning and sparse matrix ordering. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:17:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:17:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211317.n4LDHmfh025325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 --- Comment #9 from Deji Akingunola 2009-05-21 09:17:45 EDT --- Xiphos-3.1, which includes fixes for the compile-time warnings in comment #3 have now being released. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/xiphos-3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211322.n4LDMtg7027743@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-21 09:22:54 EDT --- This one is quite hard to read, due to the frequent use of macros. However, I don't think it can be done any other way, so I'll do my best to read through them. ---- The %files list contains some redundant entries: %dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/%{name1}%{majorver} %dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/dde* %dir %{_mingw32_libdir}/reg* %{_mingw32_libdir}/%{name1}%{majorver}/* %{_mingw32_libdir}/dde*/* %{_mingw32_libdir}/reg*/* These can be simplified to: %{_mingw32_libdir}/%{name1}%{majorver}/ %{_mingw32_libdir}/dde*/ %{_mingw32_libdir}/reg*/ ---- For readability, you might want to move this piece of code to the top of the .spec file: # don't run "make test" by default %{?_without_check: %define _without_check 0} %{!?_without_check: %define _without_check 1} ---- Is the rename of the import libraries from .a to .dll.a really necessary? AFAIK, this is only needed for libtool based libraries (which tcl isn't) ---- The native tcl package is now at version 8.5.7. You might want to update to that version too. See http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/tcl/devel/tcl.spec?view=log for the complete list of changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 13:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] New: Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Summary: Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david.hannequin at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: WebInject is a free tool for automated testing of web applications and web services. It can be used to test individual system components that have HTTP interfaces (JSP, ASP, CGI, PHP, AJAX, Servlets, HTML Forms, XML/SOAP Web Services, REST, etc), and can be used as a test harness to create a suite of [HTTP level] automated functional, acceptance, and regression tests. A test harness allows you to run many test cases and collect/report your results. WebInject offers real-time results display and may also be used for monitoring system response times. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211412.n4LECWXa012447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #11 from leigh scott 2009-05-21 10:12:31 EDT --- The gmixer-1.3-4 srpm builds at Koji on all targets on all active dists. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368360 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368325 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368345 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368353 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:26:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:26:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211426.n4LEQvuD017446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-21 10:26:54 EDT --- #1: Ralf is right here, use the macro %cmake instead of cmake. #2: Also before creating the SRPM, change the permissions of both the spec file and the sources to 0644, currently : chitlesh(rpmbuild)[1]$rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.src.rpm armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo-0.6.11.tar.gz 0640 armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo.spec 0640 #3: Swap the docs_user and LICENSE.txt from %name-devel to %name as they are user specific. #4: remove /usr/share/doc/armadillo-devel-0.6.11/examples/Makefile.cmake after make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211431.n4LEVol1019557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 10:31:48 EDT --- Would you write CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470155] Review Request: xword - Reads and writes crossword puzzles in the Across Lite file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211434.n4LEYJ02020066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470155 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(alexeskin at yahoo.c | |om) | --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 10:34:15 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211435.n4LEZ5pO021110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 10:35:00 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211436.n4LEaTXr021813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(antti.andreimann@ | |mail.ee) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 10:36:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479546] Review Request: jailkit - Jailkit limits user accounts to specific files and/or commands In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211435.n4LEZxcQ021477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479546 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(dignan.patrick at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 10:35:55 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this as a duplicate of the new one, thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211438.n4LEce6s022350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #12 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-21 10:38:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Gnome2-Wnck Short Description: Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit Owners: liangsuilong Branches: F-10 F-10 devel InitialCC: liangsuilong Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500249] Pre-Review Request: plexus-digest - Plexus Digest / Hashcode Components In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211451.n4LEpkj4026667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500249 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Overholt 2009-05-21 10:51:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I wrote it based on spot's comment: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500246#c8 > > DO you think that was not meant for the whole plexus, but just for > plexus-classworlds? Yes, I think it just applies to plexus-classworlds where that LICENSE.txt file exists. There's nothing similar in this package to warrant a " and Plexus", is there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 14:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 10:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] New: Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler Alias: xsdcpp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Summary: Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: antti.andreimann at mail.ee QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp, kalev at smartlink.ee, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd.spec SRPM URL: http://anttix.org/fedora/pkg/xsd-3.2.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: CodeSynthesis XSD is an open-source, cross-platform W3C XML Schema to C++ data binding compiler. Provided with an XML instance specification (XML Schema), it generates C++ classes that represent the given vocabulary as well as parsing and serialization code. You can then access the data stored in XML using types and functions that semantically correspond to your application domain rather than dealing with intricacies of reading and writing XML. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368376 Known issues: 1. The doc sub-package has a two Postscript files that rpmlint grunts about not being in UTF-8 encoding. I couldn't find any reasonable converter that can convert Postscript files to another encoding and AFAIK many printers do not support UTF-8 at all. 2. The main package contains both: the xsd schema compiler and the header files needed to build the generated code. Rpmlint does not like it at all. However there is no value in separating headers from the compiler: if You use the compiler to generate C++ code, You most certainly want to build the generated files as well. 3. Compiler binary is renamed to xsdcxx to avoid a name conflict. The same naming is currently used in the debian project (http://packages.debian.org/source/lenny/xsd). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 15:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211504.n4LF43C3031043@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(antti.andreimann@ | |mail.ee) | --- Comment #8 from Antti Andreimann 2009-05-21 11:04:01 EDT --- Thank You for Your encouragement. I have discarded the idea to package every little piece of this xsd stuff separately. I found an "easy to use" bundle that includes all the components and a build script. The same bundle is used by debian to build the xsd compiler package present in lenny. So I have created a new xsd package for Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 15:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211516.n4LFGYio003585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-21 11:16:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) Thanks for taking! That was quick! > This one is quite hard to read, due to the frequent use of macros. However, I > don't think it can be done any other way, so I'll do my best to read through > them. I modified the native tcl package spec file. > The %files list contains some redundant entries: Fixed. > For readability, you might want to move this piece of code to the top of the > .spec file: > # don't run "make test" by default > %{?_without_check: %define _without_check 0} > %{!?_without_check: %define _without_check 1} This is again from the native spec file. I kept it there to minimize the differences. So the %check section could probably completely go... > Is the rename of the import libraries from .a to .dll.a really necessary? > AFAIK, this is only needed for libtool based libraries (which tcl isn't) I don't think the renaming is strictly necessary. I did it to make it extra clear that the .a files are implibs, not static libraries... > The native tcl package is now at version 8.5.7. You might want to update to > that version too. See Woohoo. Just when you think you're up to date :) But there does not seem to be a successful build of 8.5.7 in koji. So I'm ahead now :) Updated: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 15:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211553.n4LFrwKU018535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Bug 492397 depends on bug 499341, which changed state. Bug 499341 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Text-Diff - Engine for performing and rendering text diffs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499341 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-21 11:53:56 EDT --- Hi Xavier, Could you share latest spec file and SRPMS for (hope so) final review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 15:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211556.n4LFuHd5019462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #12 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-21 11:56:16 EDT --- # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. YES # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. YES # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. YES # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. YES # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. YES # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. YES # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. YES # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. YES # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. YES # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. YES # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. YES # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. YES # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. NO # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. YES # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. YES # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. YES # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. YES # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. YES # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. N/A # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. YES You dont own /usr/share/gmixer directory. Just add: %{_datadir}/%{name}/ in files section before importing to CVS. Other than that no problems found. ________________________________________ ( Package gmixer is APPROVED by igjurisk ) ---------------------------------------- o ^__^ o (Oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:08:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211608.n4LG8m4b028640@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 MartinG changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gronslet at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from MartinG 2009-05-21 12:08:46 EDT --- I would also like to see this in Fedora -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 15:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211556.n4LFuhlx019857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 15:56:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 11:56:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211556.n4LFuKEl019762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #7 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-21 11:56:18 EDT --- Hi, any news? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211609.n4LG9eYs028888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #13 from leigh scott 2009-05-21 12:09:39 EDT --- Hi Igjurisk, Thank you for reviewing gmixer for me. Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:10:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:10:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211610.n4LGAp8f029574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from leigh scott 2009-05-21 12:10:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gmixer Short Description: Just a simple audio mixer Owners: leigh123linux Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] New: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons Alias: perl-Lingua-Flags https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Summary: Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lingua-Flags/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lingua-Flags.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Module with small flags icons. You can get them in base64 inline HTML image or as a gif image. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368784 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:23:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:23:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211623.n4LGNxOr000729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #18 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-21 12:23:57 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemPerl.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/perl-SystemPerl-1.320-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211624.n4LGO9Qu032373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 12:23:58 EDT --- Some pre-remarks: !!!! About license Well, actually almost all the files in this tarball are under GPLv3+, however sslogger.c is under "BSD with advertising", which conflicts with GPLv3+: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing For this package, actually sl.c (under GPLv3+) actually calls execvp() for sslogger, which is written in sslogger.c (BSD with advertising), licenses really conflict. * Please consider to use %?dist macro: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag * BuildRoot does not honor Fedora's packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * Source0 must be specified with full URL: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL * Some needed Requires(pre) or so are missing: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets * Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Debuginfo * Please use macros for standard directories. For example, you should use %{_localstatedir} for /var: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * For binary names - In Fedora other rpm already uses the name "%{_bindir}/sl" - And IMO the name "%{_bindir}/replay" is too generic. - Also I recommend to change %log_dir to %_localstatedir/log/sslogger or so. * Fedora considers that deleting user/group automatically by rpm scriptlets is dangerous and this must be done manually by sysadmin -------------------------------------------------------------------- %post chown -R %{suser}.%{sgroup} %{log_dir} -------------------------------------------------------------------- * - is actually useless. This scriptlet is executed only when this rpm is installed or upgraded and does nothing when this rpm is actually used. * Fedora uses %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} as directory to install documents - By the way currently the directory %{_docdir}/sslogger/ itself is not owned by this package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories Setting FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492165] Review Request: rotoscope - A free rotoscoping application. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211637.n4LGbvOL004619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492165 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(yanstadel at googlem | |ail.com) | --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 12:37:55 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492094] Review Request: darksnow - GTK Interface for darkice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211638.n4LGcVql004314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492094 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 12:38:30 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211639.n4LGd6k5004522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 12:39:04 EDT --- ping again, someone? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211639.n4LGdA5Z004578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-21 12:39:07 EDT --- Seems I'm a slacker at heart. Sorry for the delay. Anyway: 1. the source is in macosx zip format. Since the people in charge of rpm and unzip refused to fix their support for osx zip archives, you need to perform the un-zipping manually to avoid leaving a stray __MACOSX directory behind in the build root (annoys people doing full-distro rebuilds). Use something like: %setup -q -c -T unzip -j -L -q %{SOURCE0} (the gfs font packages have the same problem) 2. Microsoft considers faces in modern font families should only differ on weight, width or slope) and a lot of software is confused by anything else. Therefore, the shadow face should be split in a woodardworks-laconic-shadow-fonts subpackage IMHO, making it a multi-family package. 3. the font is definitely sans-serif, your fontconfig file should declare it there The rest of the packaging seems fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211641.n4LGfExw006025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 12:41:11 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477958] Review Request: id3mtag - Command line mass ID3 tagging utility for audio files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211640.n4LGeLed005581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 12:40:18 EDT --- Once closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 16:43:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 12:43:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211643.n4LGhb1X006668@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-21 12:43:36 EDT --- To quote https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Maintainers_Flags_Policy < References: Message-ID: <200905211705.n4LH5Pvk012763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #16 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-21 13:05:22 EDT --- Is this covered under the Sun re-licensing that also affected other RPC implementations in Fedora? http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-May/msg01673.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211719.n4LHJ1j3016675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-21 13:18:59 EDT --- First review: 1. W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt ? please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging guidelines 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is really needed 5. your URL does not work 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) 7. I'd drop the first ? of your description 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig file. For version 1.1, it will be "NotCourierSans" 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:31:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:31:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] New: Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic Alias: slashem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Summary: Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://slashem.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/slashem.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/slashem-0.0.8-0.1.E0F1.fc12.src.rpm Description: >From the land before 3DFX, before VGA graphics and DOOM, before the IBM PC, way back in the dark ages of Unixland, there was a game. They called it Rogue. People played it, and found it good. From this basis, Hack was born. Soon Hack became Nethack, because it was developed by many people (and has nothing to do with hacking the internet). And people played this on many machines, from Unices to Macs to PCs, due to the amazing power of Open Source Code. But the DevTeam, the reclusive masterminds of Nethack, are a rather quiet bunch, gracing the world with new versions as they see fit, and when they see fit. Which is usually a new version every good number of years. And there was much gnashing of teeth. But because of the Freely Available Source Code Phenomenon, people began making their own versions of Nethack to tide themselves between magical releases. SLASH'EM is the (continuing) saga of one such variant... Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368974 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:43:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:43:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211743.n4LHhn7E024253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #17 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-21 13:43:47 EDT --- Not at the moment, we had to request the license changes on a per package, per file basis from Sun, and the list we sent them was before I was aware of this one. We have already sent them an additional list of the affected files in this package and requested the same relicensing, but we have not yet heard back. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211743.n4LHhF74022722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-21 13:43:14 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix-0.04.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.04.4-1 - Update to 0.04.4 - Drop upstreamed patches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 17:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 13:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211752.n4LHqlCj026896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sanjay.ankur at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #4 from Ankur Sinha 2009-05-21 13:52:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > First review: > > 1. W: file-not-utf8 > /usr/share/doc/NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts-20080906/FONTLOG.txt > ? please use iconv to fix this file's encoding (you have an example in sil > andika, make sure you've the right source encoding though) > > 2. please use lowercase package naming only as requested by the fonts packaging > guidelines > > 3. please add the oflb- foundry prefix to the package name > > 4. unless the fonts authors asked you to, I don't thing the -sfd postfix is > really needed > > 5. your URL does not work > > 6. it seems upstreams versions this font properly, so you can use a real > version instead of a timestamp (current is 1.1) > > 7. I'd drop the first ? of your description > > 8. the font is derived from a GPL font so it must stay GPL. Upstream has > already fixed this in its last release (do not forget to update your %doc) > > 9. Be very careful to use the exact name the font declares in your fontconfig > file. For version 1.1, it will be "NotCourierSans" > > 10. since the fonts are missing an italic face, I wouldn't stack them at 60 in > fontconfig, 61 or 62 would be better > > Anyway that's all for now, thank you for continuing to package Fedora fonts bah... they edited it all on may 17.. I'll redo the package.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 18:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211801.n4LI1Ruu029588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 14:01:25 EDT --- Well * Please address the issues of - directory ownership (mentioned in my comment 4) - and changing "tetris" word on script name and in documents (mentioned in spot's comment 5) * About patching ------------------------------------------------------- patch -p0 -b --suffix .warning < %{SOURCE1} ------------------------------------------------------- - This can be replaced by ------------------------------------------------------- %patch1 -p0 -b .warning ------------------------------------------------------- * Make build log more verbose - This package also shows build log like: ------------------------------------------------------- 77 /usr/bin/perl -MExtUtils::Command -e mkpath blib/lib/Goo/Canvas 78 [ CC xs/goocanvas.c ] 79 [ CC xs/goocanvasbounds.c ] 80 [ CC xs/goocanvasellipse.c ] 81 [ CC xs/goocanvasgroup.c ] ------------------------------------------------------- which is not so useful. Please make build.log more verbose, to show if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored, for example. For this package the following works. ------------------------------------------------------- make %{?_smp_mflags} NOECHO= ------------------------------------------------------- And please change the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 18:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 14:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905211838.n4LIcILQ006484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-21 14:38:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks for taking! That was quick! I'm waiting for somebody to review my review requests, so it's best to do other reviews in return :) > > For readability, you might want to move this piece of code to the top of the > > .spec file: > > # don't run "make test" by default > > %{?_without_check: %define _without_check 0} > > %{!?_without_check: %define _without_check 1} > > This is again from the native spec file. I kept it there to minimize the > differences. So the %check section could probably completely go... Yeah, I've also seen it in the native spec file. However, I still think such pieces of code need to be near the top of .spec files as it helps people who are manually rebuilding the package to find out there's an option to enable the testsuite. Right now, it's hidden somewhere in the .spec file and easily overlooked. > > Is the rename of the import libraries from .a to .dll.a really necessary? > > AFAIK, this is only needed for libtool based libraries (which tcl isn't) > > I don't think the renaming is strictly necessary. I did it to make it extra > clear that the .a files are implibs, not static libraries... Have you tried compiling TCL-based applications (or other libraries) against this package to test whether the compiler can find the .dll.a file? (Normally libtool takes care of that, but as TCL isn't libtool based it's best to verify this) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:01:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:01:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478743] Review Request: saga - SAGA is a free, hybrid, cross-platform GIS software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212101.n4LL1ASn015837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478743 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(cristian.balint at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-05-21 17:01:06 EDT --- The submitter has not responded. I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:01:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:01:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212101.n4LL1HB2015899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-21 17:01:15 EDT --- I have reviewed the package. Everything seems good. - rpmlint can be ignored: globus-gssapi-error-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1369237 ------------------------------------------------------ This package (globus-gssapi-error) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472791] Review Request: fontbox - A Java library for parsing font files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212103.n4LL3LcW018176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472791 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(mefoster at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-05-21 17:03:19 EDT --- The submitter has not responded. I am closing this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:04:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] New: Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Summary: Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/agedu.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10.src.rpm Upstream URL: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/agedu/ Description: Agedu is a program that helps you to track down wasted disk space by creating a graphical representation of last access times and occupied disk space of files and directories. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:20:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:20:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212120.n4LLKusO021567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 17:20:54 EDT --- smem-0.1-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smem-0.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212129.n4LLTq4b024953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 17:29:51 EDT --- smem-0.1-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/smem-0.1-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212132.n4LLWZlm025925@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 Michal Schmidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Michal Schmidt 2009-05-21 17:32:34 EDT --- Package imported, built on devel, F-11 and F-10, updates submitted. Closing this review. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 21:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212140.n4LLe052026287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-21 17:39:58 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gssapi-error Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 22:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212200.n4LM0SY0000775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 --- Comment #5 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-21 18:00:27 EDT --- 389-ds-base-devel.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - This is the only remaining warning. I believe this is because the devel package installs two shared library symlinks in /usr/lib/dirsrv: /usr/lib/dirsrv/libslapd.so /usr/lib/dirsrv/libns-dshttpd.so This is the usual convention for -devel packages, to install symlinks called .so that point to the real shared lib. I don't know why rpmlint doesn't like it, and I would like this error waived. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] New: Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Summary: Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/mod_log_post.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.src.rpm Description: mod_log_post can be used for logging all HTTP POST messages. The module is based on mod_security but in difference it never returns any error messages to the visitors of your websites. Logging of POST data can be very useful for debugging purposes or analyses. As the module is loaded and run after the SSL decryption, it even can log POST data transmitted before via SSL to the Apache web server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212314.n4LNESjs015719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #19 from Brennan Ashton 2009-05-21 19:14:27 EDT --- I will evaluate this new package tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212324.n4LNO0i8017341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:24:00 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212324.n4LNOFUb017379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:24:14 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:23:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212323.n4LNNE6X017245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:23:13 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212324.n4LNOJYJ017410@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.2.5-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212324.n4LNOWA2017470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:24:31 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-memcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5290 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212323.n4LNNTgp017288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212323.n4LNNOo4015566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:23:24 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQlwm016615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:26:47 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212325.n4LNPBgE016146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:25:10 EDT --- xfce4-cddrive-plugin-0.0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQYZp016542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:26:33 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:27:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:27:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212327.n4LNRKb4016689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.5-1.fc10 |0.0.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212323.n4LNNIIb015535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQcn3016577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.5-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQBeu016495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.0-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:25:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:25:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212325.n4LNPLpa018031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:25:21 EDT --- lxinput-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQIB7018292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:26:17 EDT --- lxinput-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSSfx018785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:28:27 EDT --- xfce4-notifyd-0.1.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212327.n4LNRTUi018568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:27:28 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQOxG018323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:26:23 EDT --- lxde-settings-daemon-0.4-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQSrL018353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQ6NK018238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:26:04 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSHmh018727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:28:16 EDT --- xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQqZn018431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.0-1.fc10 |4.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNT7sh018895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:29:06 EDT --- xfce4-radio-plugin-0.4.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSix6018839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:28:43 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212327.n4LNRqMb018649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:27:51 EDT --- gnome-applet-alarm-clock-0.2.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212327.n4LNRXGc018595@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-2.fc10 |0.4-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212327.n4LNRGb9018529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:27:15 EDT --- xfce4-cellmodem-plugin-0.0.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNTMjS018960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.7-6.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:25:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:25:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499279] Review Request: xfce4-cddrive-plugin - Xfce panel plugin to open or close a CD-ROM drive tray In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212325.n4LNPFDL018000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499279 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212326.n4LNQwmd018461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:26:57 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.1.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-pecl-memcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNTYe4017737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:29:33 EDT --- lxmenu-data-0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212330.n4LNUHC1018235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:30:16 EDT --- lxshortcut-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491614] Review Request: mingw32-libglademm24 - C++ wrapper for libglade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNTHAW017701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491614 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:29:16 EDT --- mingw32-libglademm24-2.6.7-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSuDT017574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:28:56 EDT --- globus-gss-assist-4.0-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499132] Review Request: gnome-applet-alarm-clock - Alarm clock for your GNOME panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212327.n4LNRujB017113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499132 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.2.5-1.fc11 |0.2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467239] Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNT1Rl017609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.0-1.fc11 |4.0-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNTBOQ017637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.1-1.fc11 |0.4.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499281] Review Request: xfce4-cellmodem-plugin - Cell Modem monitor plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSmYG017498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499281 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.5-1.fc11 |0.0.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499282] Review Request: xfce4-notifyd - Simple notification daemon for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSW1Z017456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499282 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499283] Review Request: xfce4-radio-plugin - V4l radio device control plugin for the Xfce panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212328.n4LNSL8O017393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.4.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:30:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:30:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212330.n4LNU12l019396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:30:00 EDT --- mingw32-plotmm-0.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNTpxr019330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 19:29:50 EDT --- glista-0.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496718] Review Request: mingw32-plotmm - MinGW GTKmm plot widget for scientific applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212330.n4LNU5eN019726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496718 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.2-2.fc11 |0.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499125] Review Request: glista - Simple personal to-do list manager or task tracking tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212329.n4LNTtx8019355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499125 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4-2.fc9 |0.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212334.n4LNYwjp020456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #5 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-21 19:34:57 EDT --- new SRPM: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-1.1.7-5.src.rpm new Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 cd3fd64fabc0265e2765101d032d7150 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 a594b0f3b8b5614a5f9a8a417ff5c394ecd7a21d 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 This fixes the undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212345.n4LNjp6R021145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #77 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:45:49 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:45:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212345.n4LNjblJ021066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:45:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189611] Review Request: milter-regex regular expression based sendmail milter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212344.n4LNikw7020529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189611 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:44:45 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212345.n4LNj1u0020715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 478918 depends on bug 467239, which changed state. Bug 467239 Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:45:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:48:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:48:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500251] Pre-Review Request: dumbster - Fake SMTP Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212348.n4LNm9Yf022596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500251 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:48:07 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500253] Pre-Review Request: directory-naming - Directory Naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212349.n4LNnELT022674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500253 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:49:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212345.n4LNjEIr022184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #31 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:45:13 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212346.n4LNk448022393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:46:03 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212345.n4LNjSAJ022246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:45:26 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:49:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:49:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500254] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-jxpath - Simple XPath interpreter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212349.n4LNnxuW021565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500254 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:49:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212351.n4LNpxW0022125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:51:58 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:54:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:54:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500257] Pre-Review Request: easymock - Easy mock objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212354.n4LNsP1M023568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500257 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:54:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500256] Pre-Review Request: jakarta-commons-configuration - Commons Configuration Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212350.n4LNotW5023209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500256 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:50:54 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212352.n4LNq6bp023427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 Bug 457160 depends on bug 489046, which changed state. Bug 489046 Summary: cmake fails in user's macro. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489046 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #29 from Paul F. Kunz 2009-05-21 19:52:01 EDT --- I see that cmake-2.6.4-1 is now in updates for Fedora 10. This version fixes the bug discussed in the previous comments. So I fixed the zorba.spec file to require this version and things build fine for me on Fedora 10. I had gcc 4.4 installed in /usr/local on my development machine and the sources required a few patches to compile with that version. So I've included them with this update. These patches do not break the build with older versions of gcc. New upload SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.5-6.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212352.n4LNql9R022245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-21 19:52:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212356.n4LNuSgH022871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 453865 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453865 depends on bug 453854, which changed state. Bug 453854 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453865 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 453857, which changed state. Bug 453857 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 453858, which changed state. Bug 453858 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 453861, which changed state. Bug 453861 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 453862, which changed state. Bug 453862 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453865 depends on bug 467239, which changed state. Bug 467239 Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-21 19:56:27 EDT --- This one is also good out of the box. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1369405 - rpmlint is silent. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-proxy-utils) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 21 23:58:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 19:58:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905212358.n4LNw4M4023029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #2 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-21 19:58:03 EDT --- Source0 path should be http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/libidn/libidn-%{version}.tar.gz Fedora review mingw32-libidn-1.14-1.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-22 Another scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1369425 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-libidn.spec mingw32-libidn-1.14-1.fc12.src.rpm mingw32-libidn-1.14-1.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-libidn-static-1.14-1.fc12.noarch.rpm mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/da/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en at boldquot/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/en at quot/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fi/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/id/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/ro/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/vi/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/libidn.mo mingw32-libidn-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libidn.a mingw32-libidn-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 18 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ + License matches the actual package license It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libidn package + The package contains the license file (COPYING, COPYING.LIB) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 2ac3913b2d6c42bf445e7c55db3e2a99 libidn-1.14.tar.gz 2ac3913b2d6c42bf445e7c55db3e2a99 x/libidn-1.14.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define ! Source0 path invalid ! the commented references to Patch0 should go IMO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 00:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220015.n4M0FqW7026969@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-21 20:15:51 EDT --- mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 00:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 20:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220045.n4M0jWdG030331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Luke Macken 2009-05-21 20:45:31 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-repoze-who Short Description: An identification and authentication framework for WSGI Owners: lmacken Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.eu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 01:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 21:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220102.n4M12GMe000558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #23 from manuel wolfshant 2009-05-21 21:02:14 EDT --- Chris, could you please upload perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.10-1.fc10.src.rpm ? I see only the binaries at http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/reviewtool/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 01:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 21:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220107.n4M17SoU001854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2009-05-21 21:07:26 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what.spec http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc10.src.rpm * Thu May 21 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0.8-1 - Update to 1.0.8 - Create a docs subpackage for the compiled Sphinx documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220201.n4M21eM9011722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499483 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220201.n4M21fAC011747@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |479020 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220203.n4M23cbS011873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sergio.pasra at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2009-05-21 22:03:30 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-wsgiref.spec * Thu May 21 2009 Luke Macken - 0.1.2-3 - Update the license tag to 'Python or ZPLv2.1' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:13:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:13:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220213.n4M2DilT012753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2009-05-21 22:13:43 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-webflash.spec * Thu May 21 2009 Luke Macken 0.1-0.1.a9 - Update to 0.1a9 - Add python-coverage to the BuildRequires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220223.n4M2NmQU015932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com Bug 499476 depends on bug 499475, which changed state. Bug 499475 Summary: Review Request: python-morbid - A lightweight message queue for bundled deployment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499475 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220231.n4M2VUwH016431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Dean Glazeski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] New: Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Summary: Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dnglaze at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd.spec SRPM URL: http://files.dinoprojects.com/openocd-0.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. My user name is dnglaze over in FAS. The Open On-Chip Debugger (OpenOCD) provides debugging, in-system programming and boundary-scan testing for embedded devices. Various different boards, targets, and interfaces are supported to ease development time. Install OpenOCD if you are looking for an open source solution for hardware debugging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220234.n4M2YGoi016806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #1 from Dean Glazeski 2009-05-21 22:34:15 EDT --- Running rpmlint on the final binary RPM does result in errors concerning a statically linked library that is built for targets and not to be run by OpenOCD. Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502112 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 02:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 22:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220253.n4M2rkA0021909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #18 from Ed Brand 2009-05-21 22:53:45 EDT --- I like the pre 11 way of License: distributable :) I don't claim to be a Licence/Leagal expert but does changing to below work? License: GPLv3 and BSD with advertising Once past the Licence stage, I'll address the remaining issues -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 03:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 23:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220326.n4M3Q8QB026840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #19 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-21 23:26:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I don't claim to be a Licence/Leagal expert but does changing to below work? > License: GPLv3 and BSD with advertising No. "GPLv3+" and "BSD with advertising" are incompatible. This means that you have to ask the upstream developer to change the license of the source (for this case the most possible way is that the upstream changes the license of sslogger.c to "BSD", not "BSD with advertising") -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 04:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 00:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220423.n4M4NumV005002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-22 00:23:55 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-proxy-utils Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 04:49:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 00:49:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220449.n4M4nMWc010913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #4 from KaiGai Kohei 2009-05-22 00:49:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > The rpmlint says as follows: > > [kaigai at masu ~]$ rpmlint > /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i586/mod_selinux-2.2.1903-1.fc11.i586.rpm > mod_selinux.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. > > The mod_selinux requires libselinux but I didn't note an explicit earliest > version number because it is now unclear when getcon_raw()/setcon_raw() is > included into libselinux package. > (At least, it was already merged in the period of Fedora *Core*.) > > Is it allowed to restrict it on somewhere enough new version > (e.g libselinux >= 2.0.0)? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires Hmm, it says as follows: | Packages must not contain explicit Requires on libraries except | when absolutely necessary. When explicit library Requires are necessary, | there should be a spec file comment justifying it. I fixed the mod_selinux.spec to remove explicit dependency to libselinux (without specific version number), as follows: Spec: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/mod_selinux.spec_v2.2.1930 SRPM: http://sepgsql.googlecode.com/files/mod_selinux-2.2.1930-1.fc11.src.rpm Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 04:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 00:53:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220453.n4M4rFhU012470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #78 from Garry Reisky 2009-05-22 00:53:12 EDT --- I'm not sure where libmumbe should reside. Right now it is in /usr/lib. Should it be in /usr/lib/mumble? Also. Libmumble should have 2 more symlinks in /usr/lib/mumble. So wether libmumble is in /usr/lib or /usr/lib/mumble 2 more symlinks should be added. libmumble.so -> libmumble.so.1.1.8* libmumble.so.1 -> libmumble.so.1.1.8* libmumble.so.1.1 -> libmumble.so.1.1.8* libmumble.so.1.1.8* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 05:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220502.n4M52jrn014891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 01:02:45 EDT --- globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 05:02:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220502.n4M52f7S014835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 01:02:40 EDT --- globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 05:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 01:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220502.n4M52oH5014929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 01:02:49 EDT --- globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 06:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220615.n4M6F9mD032307@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #76 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-22 02:15:04 EDT --- http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/publican/publican-0.45-0.7+fedora.fc10.noarch.rpm This one I actually tested with a scratch build in brew (see the publican bug). So I am confident now that the patch should be ok with the current redhat workflow. Here is a koji scratch build done with it too: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1369750 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 06:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220632.n4M6W0Jr003342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 02:31:59 EDT --- pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 06:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220633.n4M6Xkxj002855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 02:33:45 EDT --- pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-gfire-0.8.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 06:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220635.n4M6Z7h1004210@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 06:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220650.n4M6oQOU006694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 02:50:25 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 06:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 02:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220650.n4M6oVBR007506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 02:50:30 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 07:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220702.n4M72iLF010263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 03:02:43 EDT --- perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 07:03:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:03:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220703.n4M73V0X010432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 03:03:26 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 07:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 03:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220702.n4M72d6K009110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 03:02:38 EDT --- perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:23:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:23:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220823.n4M8N61v026186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-22 04:23:05 EDT --- ping :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:28:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220828.n4M8SP2K028532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 04:28:25 EDT --- gmixer-1.3-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmixer-1.3-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:27:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220827.n4M8RWeZ028446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 04:27:22 EDT --- gmixer-1.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmixer-1.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220829.n4M8T7vg028626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-22 04:29:06 EDT --- Some notes: * Spec file name - must be "gnome-mud.spec". * License tag - The license tag "GPL" is invalid on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL For this package this should be "GPLv2+". * BR (BuildRequires) - Please check if you really have to write explicit version dependency on BRs. Note that the least version currently supported by Fedora project is "Fedora 9". This means that if the package listed in your BR already has higher version on F-9 than is required in your spec file, writing explicit version dependency is not likely to be needed. - Please remove redundant BuildRequires * This is GTK 2 package and "BR: gtk+-devel" is not needed ("gtk+-devel" is for GTK 1 package) * description-line-too-long - Fedora requests that %description should not contain a line longer than 79 characters. * Timestamps - Please consider to use --------------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------------- to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Scriptlets - "desktop-file-validate" check must be at %install (i.e. after "make install" is done), not at %post - Please check GConf scriptlets --------------------------------------------------------------------- %pre .... gconftool-2 --makefile-uninstall-rule \ %{_sysconfdir}/gconf/schemas/%{name} .schemas >/dev/null || : ^^^^^^^ --------------------------------------------------------------------- * There is a questionable space between "%name" and ".shemas" - You call scrollkeeper-update but no files are installed under %_datadir/omf/ (ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Scrollkeeper ) * Directory ownership issue - The directory %{_datadir}/%{name} itself is not owned by any packages and this package must own this. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/UnownedDirectories * Documents - Usually the file "INSTALL" is for people who want to build/install packages by themselves and not needed for people using rpm. ! By the way please make it sure that you change the release number of your spec file every time you modify your spec file and add some entry in %changelog (even during review request) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:29:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:29:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220829.n4M8TKOZ027163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 04:29:20 EDT --- gmixer-1.3-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gmixer-1.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220831.n4M8VLho029338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(twisnie+fedora at gm | |ail.com) --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-22 04:31:19 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492744] Review Request: python-grizzled - The Grizzled Utility Library is a general-purpose Python library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220832.n4M8Wxeu028012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(thesuperjason at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-22 04:32:57 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? (In reply to comment #3) > - don't use macros where they aren't needed (python, cp, mv, rm and so on) - Using thise macros is not forbidden. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 08:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 04:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220859.n4M8x8sm002398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-22 04:59:07 EDT --- sent mail to author regarding request to put a license txt file for LGPLv2 and include license blocker. - Wrong RPM Group. I think the aim of the application is not to emulate an other OS or system. Fixed. - Debuginfo package contains no sources Fixed. - Package doesn't honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS Fixed. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dvtm.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dvtm-0.5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 09:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220913.n4M9DHqf005387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #20 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-22 05:13:16 EDT --- Thanks you will need the last perl-Verilog, already built on koji. Please pull the rpm from koji if perl-Verilog has not yet hit the mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 09:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220927.n4M9RoqO006355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-22 05:27:49 EDT --- Reply from author: ======================================================================== Hi, Rakesh Pandit schrieb: > Hello Mat, > > I am packaging dvtm for fedora: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 > > There are some issues which I need to address before this gets accepted: > 1. The source files don't have license header information. I personally don't want to clutter all files with a license header which is almost as long as the code. > 2. The package just contains LICENSE file for MIT license not LGPLv2. Site mentions project is under both licenses .. so a copy of later will help. dvtm as whole is MIT/X11 the madtty.{c,h} files are LGPL. I think it's common for distros to have the full license text under something like /usr/share/common-licenses I therfore see no need to include it in the source tarball. See the following link for how debian handles it: http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/d/dvtm/dvtm_0.5.1-2/dvtm.copyright Regards, Marc -- Marc Andre Tanner >< http://www.brain-dump.org/ >< GPG key: CF7D56C0 ======================================================================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 09:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220934.n4M9YkGS007430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-22 05:34:45 EDT --- I don't think these license issues are blocker. Fixed license field: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dvtm.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dvtm-0.5.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 09:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220942.n4M9g2MJ009236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-22 05:42:01 EDT --- I will sponsor you. Can you give me your FAS username please ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 09:41:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 05:41:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905220941.n4M9f3WJ008730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|chitlesh at gmail.com | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:18:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:18:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221018.n4MAI9to017589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 06:18:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) I removed the %check section now, entirely. > Have you tried compiling TCL-based applications (or other libraries) against > this package to test whether the compiler can find the .dll.a file? (Normally > libtool takes care of that, but as TCL isn't libtool based it's best to verify > this) Yes. It links and basically works. Updated: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221025.n4MAP0JW018452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #20 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-05-22 06:24:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > > Using %cmake instead of "cmake ..." will likely resolve your issue. I tried this, and rpmlint still generates a warning. It appears that "/usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip" is supposed to strip the library, however it's not doing its job. Putting a line like "strip $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/*.so*" in the "%install" part seems to fix the warning, however I'm not sure whether this is the most appropriate fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221031.n4MAVefr019801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 06:31:39 EDT --- me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221031.n4MAVjTR019254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 06:31:44 EDT --- me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:31:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:31:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221031.n4MAVZTA019190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 06:31:33 EDT --- me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221042.n4MAg2Zb021541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-05-22 06:41:59 EDT --- I think most of the issues are now fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:40:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:40:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221040.n4MAeKD2020700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 06:40:19 EDT --- I guess we are only supposed to package libraries that are also available as native packages (at least where it makes sense). I can't seem to find a native package. Shouldn't native be packaged first? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221051.n4MApPjM023341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 06:51:24 EDT --- GLibC contains the same regular expression functions as exported by this library. However, we can't use GLibC for Win32 targets so that's why I've proposed this package. The functions exported by this library are required for GtkHTML -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:49:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221049.n4MAnmmm022793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221048.n4MAmodb022675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 06:48:49 EDT --- Fedora review mingw32-libssh2-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-22 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370201 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-libssh2* mingw32-libssh2-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libssh2.a mingw32-libssh2-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to stick to the native version + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora BSD + License matches the actual package license It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libssh2 package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm f8a3eb9bb814e0a5a2bb76a5423f5129 libssh2-1.1.tar.gz f8a3eb9bb814e0a5a2bb76a5423f5129 x/libssh2-1.1.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221052.n4MAqTgf023483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-22 06:52:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I guess we are only supposed to package libraries that are also available as > native packages (at least where it makes sense). I can't seem to find a native > package. Shouldn't native be packaged first? That's not a hard requirement. The requirement is only that what we package is a development tool or library. We do package other stuff that's not available natively. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221049.n4MAndPX022757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Levente Farkas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lfarkas at lfarkas.org --- Comment #2 from Levente Farkas 2009-05-22 06:49:38 EDT --- native package glibc already contains it, but unfortunately msvcrt do not:-( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221053.n4MArOFE022842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-22 06:53:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > native package glibc already contains it, but unfortunately msvcrt do not:-( Right -- this is exactly analogous to the situation with XDR in glibc versus mingw32-portablexdr. There should be no problem packaging this lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:55:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:55:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221055.n4MAtGiL024294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 10:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 06:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221054.n4MAssG1023868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 06:54:53 EDT --- Fedora review http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libsoup-2.26.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-22 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370211 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-libsoup* mingw32-libsoup.src: W: invalid-license LPLv2 mingw32-libsoup.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 43, tab: line 7) mingw32-libsoup.noarch: W: invalid-license LPLv2 mingw32-libsoup.src: W: invalid-license LPLv2 mingw32-libsoup.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 43, tab: line 7) mingw32-libsoup.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 43, tab: line 7) mingw32-libsoup-static.noarch: W: invalid-license LPLv2 mingw32-libsoup-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libsoup-2.4.a mingw32-libsoup-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 8 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored, except for the mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to stick to the native version + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2 ! License matches the actual package license Presumably "LPLv2" is a typo, should be "LGPLv2" It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libsoup package + The package contains the license file (COPYING) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible ! Please fix the tabs-vs-spaces issue + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 94c0495dc8bf213709bdb175ab224c7e libsoup-2.26.1.tar.bz2 94c0495dc8bf213709bdb175ab224c7e x/libsoup-2.26.1.tar.bz2 n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221101.n4MB1Knd024397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #8 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-22 07:01:18 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. The package is ready for a bit, but I hadn't had time to test it yet... Here are the links anyway : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/websvn.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/websvn-2.2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221105.n4MB5rKg027242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 07:05:52 EDT --- Fedora review http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-5.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-22 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370212 rpmlint output: $ mingw32-libxslt.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: multilib.patch mingw32-libxslt.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.1.24-6 ['1.1.24-5.fc12', '1.1.24-5'] mingw32-libxslt.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24/COPYING Copyright mingw32-libxslt.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: multilib.patch mingw32-libxslt.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch0: multilib.patch mingw32-libxslt-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libxslt.a mingw32-libxslt-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libexslt.a mingw32-libxslt-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object and no-documentation errors can be ignored. Please fix the rest. + OK ! needs attention ! rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to stick to the native version + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2 + License matches the actual package license MIT It is also the same as in the corresponding Fedora libxslt package ! The package contains the license file (COPYING) Dangling symlink + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible ! Please remove the unapplied patch0, and the changelog version issue + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm e83ec5d27fc4c10c6f612879bea9a153 libxslt-1.1.24.tar.gz e83ec5d27fc4c10c6f612879bea9a153 x/libxslt-1.1.24.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221106.n4MB6KsB025291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221112.n4MBCUZP028173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221111.n4MBBwFQ028070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 07:11:22 EDT --- Fedora review http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4-2.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-22 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370223 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw32-rxspencer* mingw32-rxspencer-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/librxspencer.a mingw32-rxspencer-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora BSD + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file (COPYRIGHT) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 20a95769c0adf98f0f014e0a423a0e32 rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4.tar.gz 20a95769c0adf98f0f014e0a423a0e32 x/rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 ! use %global instead of %define -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221111.n4MBBvht026111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-22 07:11:47 EDT --- While at it, new upstream version : http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/websvn.spec http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/websvn-2.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221142.n4MBgioU001025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Bug 478919 depends on bug 478917, which changed state. Bug 478917 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478917 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 478919 depends on bug 467237, which changed state. Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478919 depends on bug 467239, which changed state. Bug 467239 Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-22 07:42:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Mock build also fails, due to missing gssapi-error-devel gssapi-error-devel was renamed globus-gssapi-error-devel and is now available. This package was updated accordingly at the time this change was made. I hadn't realised anyone had downloaded the previous version already, so I didn't bump the release number. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221147.n4MBlgtg000304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #3 from Dean Glazeski 2009-05-22 07:47:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I will sponsor you. Can you give me your FAS username please ? My username is dnglaze in FAS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 11:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 07:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221150.n4MBoRQR000972@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Valent Turkovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |valent.turkovic at gmail.com Bug 485652 depends on bug 468631, which changed state. Bug 468631 Summary: Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Valent Turkovic 2009-05-22 07:50:25 EDT --- I will help if I can with this package, how can I help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 12:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 08:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221212.n4MCCCm6005639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-22 08:12:10 EDT --- Sun replied this morning with permission for us to relicense the Sun RPC bits in this code to BSD. I've sent Richard the new license text, so once he updates a package with the new license, I'll lift FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221301.n4MD1wlI018144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 09:01:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines > version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to > stick to the native version Yeah I know, but there was a message on the fedora-mingw mailing list recently that we were advised to upgrade to version 1.1 as it contains several win32 optimalisations: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001355.html > ! use %global instead of %define A lot of MinGW packages we have use these %define's. I think we should check every MinGW package which is in Fedora now and fix the packages if necessary. For this package I've replaced the %define's with %global's: Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libssh2.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221311.n4MDBkt2020242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 09:11:45 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libsoup.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libsoup-2.26.1-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 2.26.1-2 - Fixed license typo - Use %%global instead of %%define - Fixed mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs rpmlint warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221312.n4MDCFvH020349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(lvillani at binaryhe | |lix.net) | --- Comment #10 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-05-22 09:12:12 EDT --- Looks good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:13:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:13:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221313.n4MDDxon020596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 09:13:55 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221316.n4MDGfLH018899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #7 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 09:16:40 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-rxspencer-alpha3.8.g4-3.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - alpha3.8.g4-3 - Use %%global instead of %%define As discussed on the mailing list, I don't know if this review needs to be continued: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001469.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480103] Review Request: bnIRC - An ncurses based IRC client and modular IRC framework.(Need Sponsorship. First time Packager) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221320.n4MDKZoL019615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480103 Tom Wisniewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(twisnie+fedora at gm | |ail.com) | --- Comment #16 from Tom Wisniewski 2009-05-22 09:20:33 EDT --- Currently waiting for the dev of this program to make some changes to the names of certain libraries. I have confirmation from the dev that he's working on it but life has been getting in the way and delaying the changes. As soon as I have a new version of the software, I'll make a new RPM and upload it for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:27:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:27:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499755] Review Request: kde-colorscheme-plastik - Plastik KDE 4 Color Scheme In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221327.n4MDRVZl023237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499755 --- Comment #2 from nucleo 2009-05-22 09:27:30 EDT --- License changed to LGPLv3 http://www.fsf.org/licenses/lgpl.html Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kde-colorscheme-plastik/kde-colorscheme-plastik.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/kde-colorscheme-plastik/kde-colorscheme-plastik-0.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] New: Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Summary: Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libglpng.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/libglpng-1.45-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: glpng is a small toolkit to make loading PNG image files as an OpenGL texture as easy as possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:28:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:28:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221328.n4MDSUaw023438@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 --- Comment #3 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 09:28:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libidn.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 1.14-2 - Use %%global instead of %%define - Fixed the Source URL - Use %%find_lang for the gettext translations - Dropped the commented out patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] New: Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Summary: Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu-0.9.14-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: You are captain of the cargo ship Chromium B.S.U., responsible for delivering supplies to our troops on the front line. Your ship has a small fleet of robotic fighters which you control from the relative safety of the Chromium vessel. This is an OpenGL-based shoot 'em up game with fine graphics. Note to reviewers: This needs ftgl 2.1.3 or newer which is only in the F-12 repo, you can download it here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1369999 It also needs libglpng, which still needs to be reviewed, its review is bug 502189. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221332.n4MDWDRh021683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502189, 501323 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221332.n4MDWE1B021722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |502191 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221335.n4MDZP8K022366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 09:35:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libxslt.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 1.1.24-7 - Use %%global instead of %%define - Dropped the reference to the multilib patch as it isn't used for MinGW - Fixed dangling-relative-symlink rpmlint warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225979] Merge Review: lam In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221342.n4MDgUc1026503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225979 Bug 225979 depends on bug 473593, which changed state. Bug 473593 Summary: lam : Unowned directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473593 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:57:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:57:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221357.n4MDv3fD029114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 09:57:02 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221357.n4MDvLeG026377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221356.n4MDuDhb026273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 09:56:12 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-tcl.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmquery --requires mingw32-tcl rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 mingw32-filesystem >= 50 mingw32-runtime mingw32(kernel32.dll) mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32(tcl85.dll) mingw32(user32.dll) $ rpmquery --provides mingw32-tcl mingw32(tcl85.dll) mingw32(tclpip85.dll) mingw32(tcldde13.dll) mingw32(tclreg12.dll) mingw32-tcl = 8.5.7-2.fc11 $ md5sum tcl8.5.7-src.tar.gz f70ad8f78b5e4a9f792fe101f22b125f tcl8.5.7-src.tar.gz $ curl http://kent.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/tcl/tcl8.5.7-src.tar.gz --quiet | md5sum f70ad8f78b5e4a9f792fe101f22b125f - + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= xx is in the .spec file [+] Requires are OK [+] BuildArch: noarch [+] No man pages or info files [+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific ones [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as B ildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [*] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [/] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [/] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [/] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [/] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [/] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [/] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [/] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. ================================================= The package mingw32-tcl is APPROVED by epienbro ================================================= -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 13:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 09:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221358.n4MDwO10029346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Kalev Lember changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kalev at smartlink.ee --- Comment #8 from Kalev Lember 2009-05-22 09:58:23 EDT --- > Version: alpha3.8.g4 > Release: 2%{?dist} I believe this Version-Release tuple does not satisfy naming guidelines. [1] It seems to be an alpha pre-release, and you need to make sure you have a clean upgrade path once it hits final 3.8. Upstream versioning looks like a mess. What does the "g4" part in there mean? I think version and release should be something like: Version: 3.8 Release: 0.2.alpha%{?dist} When you change anything in the spec file, just update Release to "0.3.alpha%{?dist}". Once there is a final 3.8 release, you can change the Release to "1%{?dist}". This way ensures that every new Version-Release tuple is numerically higher than the previous one. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#PreReleasePackages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:10:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:10:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221410.n4MEAIcb031667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 10:10:17 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-tcl Short Description: MinGW Windows Tool Command Language Owners: sailer rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221413.n4MEDC5u029055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-05-22 10:13:11 EDT --- We used to ship this a long time ago - why was it removed (and has whatever caused that been fixed)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221421.n4MELRXw001315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-22 10:21:26 EDT --- That was my first thought. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221424.n4MEO6gF031014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-22 10:24:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > We used to ship this a long time ago - why was it removed (and has whatever > caused that been fixed)? The issue was non free artwork and that has been fixed by upstream now (in collaboration with Debian, its completely dfsg free now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221429.n4METGoK002506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |limb at jcomserv.net Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-22 10:29:15 EDT --- Cool. I'll have a go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:48:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:48:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221448.n4MEmCRB003782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 10:48:11 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221449.n4MEno9T004249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 10:49:48 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:54:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:54:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221454.n4MEsjG7009320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-22 10:54:44 EDT --- Feel free to take over. Robert has fixed all issues I mentioned in comment 1. Build log warns about tmpnam() usage. The implementation is not safe. It creates the temporary file in the current working directory, but that means the user must never work in a directory an attacker may be able to write in, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 14:57:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:57:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221457.n4MEvXYo010251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 10:57:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > As discussed on the mailing list, I don't know if this review needs to be > continued: > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/fedora-mingw/2009-May/001469.html As far as I understand, Tor Lillqvist's gripes were: - same DLL filename for two completely incompatible libraries - use of "secret sauce" to compile the DLL You do neither. There's no secret sauce as far as I can see, and librxspencer-0.dll does not clash with any preexisting DLL afaik. So IMO we can continue. Anyway, I think it would be good to follow Kalev's comments, even though the project hasn't done a release the last 15 or so years and it's therefore quite unlikely it will anytime soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221504.n4MF4IXm008375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 11:04:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Feel free to take over. Robert has fixed all issues I mentioned in comment 1. > > Build log warns about tmpnam() usage. The implementation is not safe. It > creates the temporary file in the current working directory, but that means the > user must never work in a directory an attacker may be able to write in, too. OK, I'll do the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221504.n4MF4UFt011933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221512.n4MFCVww014702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 11:12:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libssh2 Short Description: MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:08:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:08:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221508.n4MF863D013162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 11:08:04 EDT --- Just found this link on the website of rxspencer explaining the alpha status, http://arglist.com/regex/usenet-spencer-1993-08-07.txt : Then there's my new one, which is the regular-expression implementation shipping with 4.4BSD. The good news is that it's completely POSIX.2 compliant. The bad news is that it's pretty slow; it's basically an alpha release, and I'd really hoped to get at least to a beta before 4.4 shipped, but that didn't happen. Eventually there will be a faster release, but don't ask me to set a date just yet. That comment was from back in '93.. I think it's better to drop this package in favor of libgnurx. I'll package it and come up with a new review request ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221513.n4MFDGje011331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 11:13:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libsoup Short Description: MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221514.n4MFE0lE011630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 11:13:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libidn Short Description: MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221515.n4MFF1tX015312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-22 11:14:59 EDT --- Thomas, thanks for all the reviews!! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libxslt Short Description: MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: baz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221524.n4MFO6q4014849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |kwizart at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-22 11:24:04 EDT --- - starting review - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221523.n4MFN3Kv018123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-22 11:23:02 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:26:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:26:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499984] Review Request: mingw32-rxspencer - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221526.n4MFQZ4b016230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499984 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX AssignedTo|t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #11 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-22 11:26:33 EDT --- Ok, so dropping out as reviewer and closing the review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226146] Merge Review: mkinitrd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221538.n4MFctrJ022614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226146 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 11:38:52 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 15:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 11:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221555.n4MFtPB9024055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 11:55:23 EDT --- - Instead of manually removing the static .a libraries, you can probably just use the configure option --disable-static. rpmlint output: giflib-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - This is OK as documentation is in main package that is pulled in by -utils. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - License mentioned only in COPYING, source code contains no license headers. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add BUGS (and maybe TODO). MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221603.n4MG3BT2026502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-22 12:03:10 EDT --- rpmlint clean. URL should be http://chromium-bsu.sourceforge.net/ Rename README.license to chromium-README.license (but keep it README.license when installed) to avoid SRPM clobbering. Can't mock-test the BRs since ftgl isn't updated yet and libglpng isn't in rawhide yet, but I see that review's underway. Otherwise on full review, it looks great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] New: Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan Alias: perl-Carp-Clan-Share https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Summary: Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Carp-Clan-Share/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Carp-Clan-Share.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This is a very lightweight helper module (actually just an import method) that will automagically create a __PACKAGE__::Carp module for you. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370829 *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221604.n4MG4RMM029547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-22 12:04:25 EDT --- For -2: * tarball - Tarball in your srpm does not match which can be downloaded from the URL written as %SOURCE0: ------------------------------------------------------------------ 117082 2009-05-17 05:00 cups-bjnp-0.5.3.tar.gz 139933 2009-05-19 05:59 cups-bjnp-0.5.3-2.fc10.src/cups-bjnp-0.5.3.tar.gz ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Macros - Please use macros for standard directories. /usr should be either %_prefix or %_exec_prefix: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros * %defattr - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Directory ownership issue - %_exec_prefix/lib/cups/backend (defined as %cups_backend_dir) is already owned by cups rpm and this package should not own this directory itself ! Note that ------------------------------------------------------------------ %files %{cups_backend_dir} ------------------------------------------------------------------ contains all files/directories under %cups_backend_dir and the directory %cups_backend_dir itself As this directory is owned by cups (and currently this package Requires cups-libs but not cups), add "Requires: cups" to resolve directory ownership issue. * Documents - As Igor pointed out on the comment 6, "INSTALL" file is not likely to be needed. * %changelog - And modify %changelog entry -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221613.n4MGDmjg032278@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:13:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:13:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221613.n4MGDc8c032223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221614.n4MGEr8B032463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-22 12:14:52 EDT --- OK - package built with mock (tested on F-10 x86_64 & F-11 x86). OK - rpmlint libglpng on installed library is quiet. OK - library has a SONAME: 0x000000000000000e (SONAME) Library soname: [libglpng.so.1] Warning(OK) - Unused direct dependencies : # ldd -d -u /usr/lib64/libglpng.so.1.45 Unused direct dependencies: /usr/lib64/libpng12.so.0 /usr/lib64/libGL.so.1 This is weird since thoses are exactly the one that would be suggested to be usefull. One more reason not to trust too much unused direct dependencies. But at least, I don't understand why the Author speak about zlib ? It doesn't seems used from this library: quoting from glpng.htm: "It is implemented using modified versions of the LibPNG 1.0.2 and ZLib 1.1.3 libraries." Warning(OK) - directory owned by multiple package: /usr/include/GL: Since this libglpng-devel doesn't depend on another package that would own this directory, this is fine to own it. OK - source from package and website match: $ sha1sum libglpng_1.45.orig.tar.gz 98d9298c2a8588d4731af1ce22cfbf79ea5349cd libglpng_1.45.orig.tar.gz Warning(OK) - package doesn't bundle a License file, but header is explicit (MIT) Usability test: Tested with chromium (built time/ runtime) OK - (funny). This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221622.n4MGMXiC002325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 12:22:32 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498218] Review Request: picturetile - Tiles a bunch of images into one large "photo wall" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221624.n4MGOnqj003013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498218 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221623.n4MGNm1P002743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 12:23:47 EDT --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221622.n4MGMvQ5002555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221629.n4MGTO5e001290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 12:29:23 EDT --- David: please configure your name in Bugzilla (Preferences -> Name and Password -> Your real name). Also, the specfile is a mess. You really should look at doing things with find, e.g. find . -name *.rb -exec chmod 644 {} \; -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221628.n4MGSIY0004070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-22 12:28:17 EDT --- I won't add BUGS and TODO to %doc as they IMHO don't make sense there, read the content of these files before complaining, please. Using --disable-static didn't bring the expected result, thus I'm deleting. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:29:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:29:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] New: Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Summary: Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/virtuoso-opensource/virtuoso-opensource.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/virtuoso-opensource/virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11-1.src.rpm Description: Virtuoso is a scalable cross-platform server that combines SQL/RDF/XML Data Management with Web Application Server and Web Services Platform functionality. Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370877 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221634.n4MGYFkK002772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 12:34:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Hello Michael, > > Thanks for the review. > I've contacted the argtable2 maintainer, I host the src.rpm and spec file in > his site. He said he is working on a newer version which will also include the > change to example/Makefile and will upload the revised RPMS and spec file > within a few days. > > For now, the spec file can be checked out here: > cvs -d:pserver:anonymous at jessrpms.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/jessrpms login > cvs -z3 -d:pserver:anonymous at jessrpms.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/jessrpms co > -P SPECS/argtable2.spec Please, put the specfile some place easily available. The SPEC from the sourceforge page doesn't even open in firefox. You can use e.g. your fedoraproject account to host the spec and srpms. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221643.n4MGhLwn007685@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 12:43:20 EDT --- Also: - Remove the heading space from the description - Refer to argtable2 instead of libargtable2 in the devel package. - You probably don't need to use --docdir in the %configure phase. After install, you should move the documentation back into the build directory, e.g. mv %{buildroot}%{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version} docdir and include the documentation with %doc docdir/* Also, as the documentation is large, you should branch it to a package of its own as Michael suggested. (Also, I'm not very fond of using macros for rm, make and so on.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:48:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:48:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221648.n4MGmLkT006652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|483286 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459455] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221649.n4MGn2Sc006806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459455 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467958] Review Request: barry - BlackBerry(tm) Desktop for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221647.n4MGlsrS006466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467958 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483406] Review Request: perl-Text-CSV - Comma-separated values manipulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221647.n4MGlvHm006514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483406 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:48:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:48:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221648.n4MGmKF7006619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Depends on|483406 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483286] Review Request: perl-Data-Report - A flexible plugin-driven reporting framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221651.n4MGpTQc010184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483286 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459444] Review Request: ctdb - Clustered TDB In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221649.n4MGnLuD009365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459444 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454667] Review Request: truecrypt - Free open-source disk encryption software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221652.n4MGqCtB010348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454667 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492612] Review Request: python-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221648.n4MGmB3w008979@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492612 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468189] Review Request: rear - Relax and Recovery (disaster recovery framework) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221647.n4MGlmBH008850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468189 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:48:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:48:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483364] Review Request: EekBoek - Bookkeeping software for small and medium-size businesses In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221648.n4MGm3Dn008914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483364 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454580] Review Request: php-openid - PHP OpenID Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221652.n4MGqNEq007978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454580 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445151] Review Request: merkaartor - openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGrgG2008330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445151 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444817] Review Request: Spicebird - Collaboration Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGrrOP008414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444817 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446299] Review Request: perl-Text-Smart - Processor for 'smart text' markup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGrNsh008238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446299 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453083] Review Request: Samba4 - Samba4 CIFS and AD server and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221654.n4MGsMMn008633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453083 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444574] Review Request: pidgin-lastfm - Display informaiton form Last.fm profile in Pidgin status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221654.n4MGs35d008469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444574 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429221] Review Request: dzcomm - Dzcomm a RS-232 API/lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221656.n4MGuSPF012366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429221 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428413] Review Request: Freemind - Mind mapping tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221655.n4MGtMpo012098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428413 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 429178] Review Request: scantool_net - OBD2 scanner gui interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221656.n4MGuXNO012402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429178 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450226] Review Request: blueproximity - bluetooth proximity detector In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGr9qo010917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450226 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428410] Review Request: LADR - Library for Automated Deduction Research In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221655.n4MGt88f011928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428410 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446390] Review Request: cluster - RedHat Cluster Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGrUA6011021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446390 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 454207] Review Request: Terminator - Multiple terminals in one window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221652.n4MGqdtR010532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:54:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:54:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442507] Review Request: libspe2 - SPE Runtime Management Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221654.n4MGsTEf011424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442507 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445224] Review Request: stapitrace - user space instruction trace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGrbMK011082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445224 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453847] Review Request: grid-packaging-tools - The Grid Packaging Tools (GPT) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221652.n4MGqsuK010771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453847 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452832] Review Request: perl-Math-FFT - Perl extension for Fast Fourier Transforms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221654.n4MGsDQc011291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452832 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445010] Review Request: xvarstar - an astronomical program used for searching GCVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221653.n4MGrqZb011169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445010 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 434727] Review Request: libpst - utilities to convert Outlook .pst files to other formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221654.n4MGsxZD011537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434727 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428793] Review Request: xhtml2fo-style-xsl - Antenna House, Inc. XHTML to XSL:FO stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221656.n4MGuoO5012485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428793 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:54:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435121] Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221654.n4MGssfQ008963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426985] Review Request: php-suhosin - Suhosin extension for the php language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221656.n4MGu7Iw009638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426985 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 431277] Review Request: ocfs2-tools - programs for managing Ocfs2 file systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221656.n4MGuLpL009790@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431277 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 432905] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221656.n4MGuEnr009740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432905 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452413] Review Request: bkchem - Chemical drawing program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221700.n4MH0NmC014203@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452413 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437694] Review Request: bip - IRC Bouncer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221659.n4MGxfID013499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437694 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:59:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438804] Review Request: php-pear-Auth - provides methods for creating an authentication system using PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221659.n4MGxmhW013558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438804 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 16:59:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:59:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438808] Review Request: php-pear-DB-ldap - A DB compliant interface to LDAP servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221659.n4MGxtqT013641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438808 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221702.n4MH2Wfo014693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |russell at coker.com.au --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 13:02:30 EDT --- *** Bug 448458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448458] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221702.n4MH2VWT014666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448458 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 13:02:30 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 500082 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467157] Review Request: arping - ping by ARP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221704.n4MH4Dnn011838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467157 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457761] Review Request: dt - Generic data test program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221703.n4MH3Y6r011629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457761 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462034] Review Request: dstat - Versatile resource statistics tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221704.n4MH4Uow011982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462034 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:00:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438811] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-AJAX - PHP and JavaScript AJAX library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221700.n4MH0GLl010924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438811 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462446] Review Request: ttf2pt1 - TrueType to Adobe Type 1 font converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221704.n4MH4KiZ011923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462446 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 438810] Review Request: php-pear-HTTP-Download - PHP Class for handling file downloads In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221700.n4MH09cR010858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438810 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469080] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - plugin for Pidgin which displays the music track currently playing in the status message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221704.n4MH4ZVd012031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469080 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456190] Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221703.n4MH3FtN015146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 449135] Review Request: gforge - GForge Collaborative Development Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221703.n4MH36Qo015070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449135 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:03:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:03:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221703.n4MH3QV5015227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221703.n4MH3d37015308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:04:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:04:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475799] Review Request: pidgin-musictracker - Pidgin displays the musictrack currently playing in your status In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221704.n4MH4hh2012280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475799 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:04:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:04:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473205] Review Request: gPlanarity - puzzle game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221704.n4MH4dSZ012096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473205 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221710.n4MHAZaF017518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-22 13:10:32 EDT --- Peter, my comment #17 needs to be addressed. Especially, the removal of precompiled binaries is important. You can use something like this in %prep for file in dll so bin lib exe; do find . -name "*.$file" -exec rm -f {} \; ; done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221737.n4MHbld2020928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 13:37:46 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfoview-1.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221737.n4MHbfBW020882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 13:37:40 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfoview-1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 17:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 13:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221737.n4MHbqNi024000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 13:37:51 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nfoview-1.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 18:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221804.n4MI4826031451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #17 from Alasdair Kergon 2009-05-22 14:04:05 EDT --- DESTDIR and parallel make fixed in lvm2-2_02_47-1_fc12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 18:17:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:17:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221817.n4MIHkuj031596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hdegoede at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |hdegoede at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #23 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-22 14:17:44 EDT --- As discussed by mail, reviewing this one in return for you reviewing bug 502189. Full review done, here are the must and should fix's I found: Must Fix: --------- * Remove the "%define _default_patch_fuzz 2", your patches have no fuzz, so its not needed (I tested on F-11) * For the test package, the Group tag is wrong (spelling error, currently you have: "Develdment/Libraries" * matio.src:18: W: non-break-space line 18 Should Fix: ----------- * Rename the matio-1.3.3-fortanpath.patch to matio-1.3.3-fortranpath.patch (so add the missing r) * libmatio -> matio in %description * Remove these 2 commented lines from %setup please, as you've already solved this in another way in %build, they only confuse the reader (atleast they confused me): #To disable rpath #./bootstrap * Consider renaming the manpages to mathio- and installing them * Is it really useful to put the test files in a subpacke, wouldn't it be better to run them as %check and not put them in an rpm at all ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 18:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221826.n4MIQSCo005736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 --- Comment #3 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-22 14:26:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > But at least, I don't understand why the Author speak about zlib ? It doesn't > seems used from this library: quoting from glpng.htm: > "It is implemented using modified versions of the LibPNG 1.0.2 and ZLib 1.1.3 > libraries." > I believe the original original tarbal (not the Debian one we're using since upstream is dead) indeed contained modified versions of libpng and zlib (see src/Makefile.LINUX). But the new Debian provided Makefile doesn't use those but uses the system versions instead. As for referencing zlib, well libpng uses zlib. > This package is APPROVED Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 18:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221827.n4MIRue8001951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-22 14:27:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libglpng Short Description: Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 18:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221840.n4MIej7Y005441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #9 from David Hannequin 2009-05-22 14:40:43 EDT --- Hi, Thank for your review. I configured my real name in Bugzilla. Thank for your review. I work on a new specfile. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 18:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221840.n4MIe7B7005315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-22 14:40:06 EDT --- Thanks for the review! Here is an updated package with those 2 issues fixed: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu-0.9.14-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 19:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 15:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905221928.n4MJSK5b022756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #15 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-22 15:28:18 EDT --- After huge flamewars, flags policy was suspended so we can live without hiding-flags patch :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 20:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905222023.n4MKNB5a008201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-22 16:23:10 EDT --- Okay. Now: - Time stamps aren't preserved in the install phase, adding INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install should fix that. Also, use the -p argument when installing the scripts and config files to preserve the time stamp. - Are you sure you want to use %define's instead of %global's? - You can drop the license header on subpackages that have the same license as the main package (cluster and device-mapper). - You shouldn't need %attr(755,root,root) /%{_lib}/libdevmapper.so a plain /%{_lib}/libdevmapper.so should do. If not, it's better to change the permissions in the install phase. rpmlint output: device-mapper-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation device-mapper-libs.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided device-mapper device-mapper-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation lvm2.src:31: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes lvm lvm2.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided lvm lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/lvm 0555 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lock/lvm 0700 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/lvmdump 0555 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/vgimportclone 0555 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/fsadm 0555 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm/backup 0700 lvm2.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /etc/lvm/cache/.cache lvm2.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/lvm/cache/.cache 0600 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm/archive 0700 lvm2.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/lvm/cache 0700 lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Start in /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Short-Description in /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clvmd lvm2-cluster.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name clvmd 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 12 warnings. Out of these, I think you should fix: - The permissions of the binaries in /sbin, they should probably be 755. - The init file of clvmd must respect https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 21:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 17:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905222102.n4ML2CMZ016121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #79 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 17:02:08 EDT --- mumble-1.1.8-13.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumble-1.1.8-13.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 21:03:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 17:03:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905222103.n4ML3rhu016544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #80 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 17:03:51 EDT --- mumble-1.1.8-13.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumble-1.1.8-13.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 22 21:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 17:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905222105.n4ML5Wel017373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #81 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-22 17:05:31 EDT --- mumble-1.1.8-13.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mumble-1.1.8-13.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230108.n4N18aTK001011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 --- Comment #24 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-22 21:08:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) ... > Should Fix: > ----------- ... > * Consider renaming the manpages to mathio- and installing them Actually, thoses manpages are removed from matio svn trunk. My view is that they provide the same information as doxygen (since both pdf and manpages are generated from doxygen). Keeping html doxygen is lightweight and > * Is it really useful to put the test files in a subpacke, wouldn't it be > better > to run them as %check and not put them in an rpm at all ? Nice suggest. I've done that since the test_* file are likely not useful beyond build time. All others point are fixed. Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/matio.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/matio-1.3.3-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226111] Merge Review: lvm2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230140.n4N1epc8005641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226111 --- Comment #19 from Alasdair Kergon 2009-05-22 21:40:49 EDT --- I think install -p is something else we should consider upstream rather than in the spec file. I added the licence headers to subpackages as they seemed to be missing from the RPMs in old builds. But it looks like inheritance works now. (Commenting them out then rebuilding still shows them with rpm -qp RPMS/x86_64/lvm2-cluster-2.02.47-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm --qf '%{LICENSE}') mode 555 vs 755: I've always taken the view that the default permissions for every file on the system should be 000 and then only bits that are absolutely necessary should be added to that. So even 555 is a compromise for me - 011 would often suffice! The proponents of 755 would argue that the '7' is documenting the fact that the kernel permits root to read/write/execute. But I counter that by arguing that root is not generally meant to write to those files - that's solely the job of the package manager software (rpm) for very limited periods of time - so the write bit should not be set. This has the advantage that some binaries (e.g. vim) will issue a warning message ("is read-only (add ! to override)") if root attempts to change these files. In other words not setting the owner write bit makes the system more resilient against sysadmin accidents. I'll chase up the person I asked to deal with the init script and see how they're getting on with it:-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230143.n4N1huFA031657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:43:55 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxshortcut New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:44:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230144.n4N1iVRK006084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:44:30 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxmenu-data New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230143.n4N1hFGm005903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:43:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxinput New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230142.n4N1gfGu005838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:42:40 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxde-settings-daemon New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230147.n4N1lGej006681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:47:14 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: menu-cache New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230147.n4N1llpE032460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:47:45 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxtask New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:45:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:45:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452324] Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230145.n4N1jdPG032155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:45:37 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxterminal New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452395] Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230146.n4N1kCW0032325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452395 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:46:09 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxlauncher New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230145.n4N1jCEZ032094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:45:10 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxsession-edit New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230148.n4N1mpSI032566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? Bug 442270 depends on bug 442268, which changed state. Bug 442268 Summary: Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:48:47 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxde-common New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 01:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230150.n4N1oRGR000637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 21:50:23 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: xarchiver New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 02:00:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 22:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230200.n4N20tRB002094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-22 22:00:53 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: lxappearance New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:25:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:25:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230525.n4N5PqRN014648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #33 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:25:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:26:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230526.n4N5QL9J014749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:26:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230525.n4N5PKNW008076@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:25:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:27:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:27:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452324] Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230527.n4N5RBwk008480@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:27:10 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 217311] Review Request: xarchiver - Archive manager for Xfce In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230524.n4N5Oj8v007658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=217311 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:24:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:28:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:28:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452395] Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230528.n4N5SjKs008799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452395 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:28:43 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230529.n4N5TYH2015352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:29:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230531.n4N5V1w5015987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:30:59 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:31:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230531.n4N5VYAP009705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:31:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230532.n4N5WmPL009945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:32:46 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475823] Review Request: menu-cache - Caching mechanism for freedesktop.org compilant menus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230530.n4N5U9xw009435@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475823 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:30:08 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230535.n4N5Z8et017056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:35:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230534.n4N5YfK4010326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:34:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:36:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:36:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230536.n4N5apvv011138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:36:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:38:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:38:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230538.n4N5c6qG017696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:38:05 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:38:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:38:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230538.n4N5cvH5017866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:38:56 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230543.n4N5hKUH012718@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:43:19 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230541.n4N5fcKT012430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:41:37 EDT --- cvs done, except I can't find a user 'baz' in fas... please check and reset the flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 05:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 01:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230542.n4N5gcM3019001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-05-23 01:42:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 06:47:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 02:47:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230647.n4N6lDsV031846@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-23 02:47:12 EDT --- Well, I'm not sure what happened to this one - I seem to have forgotten about the package at the import stage. Anyhow, now imported and built ... F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1371885 F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1371887 F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1371886 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 06:50:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 02:50:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230650.n4N6oKH8032732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 02:50:18 EDT --- ocaml-autoconf-1.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-autoconf-1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 06:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 02:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230649.n4N6niG9025954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 02:49:43 EDT --- ocaml-autoconf-1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-autoconf-1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 06:50:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 02:50:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230650.n4N6omdf026477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 06:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 02:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230659.n4N6xSrb001815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #15 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-23 02:59:27 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 07:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 03:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462297] Review Request: perl-o2sms - A perl module to send SMS messages using .ie websites In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230700.n4N70icT028491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462297 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-23 03:00:42 EDT --- Ping again, Niall! We all waiting for you :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 07:57:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 03:57:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230757.n4N7v9Dv012939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #25 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-23 03:57:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > (In reply to comment #23) > ... > > Should Fix: > > ----------- > ... > > * Consider renaming the manpages to mathio- and installing them > Actually, thoses manpages are removed from matio svn trunk. My view is that > they provide the same information as doxygen (since both pdf and manpages are > generated from doxygen). Keeping html doxygen is lightweight and Ok. > > * Is it really useful to put the test files in a subpacke, wouldn't it be > > better > > to run them as %check and not put them in an rpm at all ? > Nice suggest. I've done that since the test_* file are likely not useful beyond > build time. > Much better :) > All others point are fixed. > Ack, looks good now, APPROVED! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 08:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 04:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230807.n4N87a1R014937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-23 04:07:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: matio Short Description: Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files Owners: kwizart Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 08:24:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 04:24:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476398] Review Request: eclib - A Library for Doing Computations on Elliptic Curves In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230824.n4N8OMJx011003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476398 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #52 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-23 04:24:19 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1372086 Closing. Thanks, Alex! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 09:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 05:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230926.n4N9QHJF027439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 05:26:16 EDT --- globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 09:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 05:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230926.n4N9QMYC027471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 05:26:21 EDT --- globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 09:26:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 05:26:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230926.n4N9QQ66020014@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 05:26:26 EDT --- globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 09:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 05:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905230931.n4N9VUsG020685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 --- Comment #6 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-23 05:31:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > cvs done, except I can't find a user 'baz' in fas... please check and reset the > flag. Oops, that was a silly copy/paste error from me. The initialCC should be empty, so it's okay now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 11:54:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 07:54:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231154.n4NBsr55008144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-23 07:54:52 EDT --- Notes: * The %build section still doesn't honour %optflags. You should fix your spec in the following way: - echo OPT=-O2 -fPIC >> make.settings.local + echo "OPT=%{optflags}" >> make.settings.local * Regarding %install section - you may shorten it a bit by replacing mkdir %{buildroot} mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/ cp ./lib/libstxxl.so %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/libstxxl.so.%{version} with install -p -D -m 0755 ./lib/libstxxl.so %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/libstxxl.so.%{version} * You also don't need to explicitly install doc-files. Just enumerate them in %files section properly. Let's assume, that you wish to install TROUBLESHOOTING file as %doc - all you need is to add %files %doc TROUBLESHOOTING and rpmbuild will cd into rpmbuild/BUILD/stxxl-1.2.1 directory and will search TROUBLESHOOTING here. So you should remove the following lines: mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/ #Install Documentation mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/ mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/doxy cp -pr doc/doxy/* %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/doxy #cp -pr doc/tutorial/tutorial.pdf %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/ #cp -p doc/tutorial/tutorial.dvi %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/ mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/examples/ cp -p doc/tutorial/examples/* %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/examples/ cp -p config_example %{buildroot}/%{_docdir}/stxxl-1.2.1/ and just add %doc doc/doxy/* doc/tutorial/examples/* config_example to "%files devel" section. Of course, docs will be installed into %{_docdir}/stxxl-devel-1.2.1/ directory. * Consider adding README and TROUBLESHOOTING to %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 12:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 08:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231255.n4NCt8sJ025416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 08:55:07 EDT --- mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-5.fc11.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-5.fc11.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 13:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231300.n4ND0Ng8018368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 09:00:22 EDT --- mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-5.fc10.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-5.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 13:12:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446989] Review Request: python-epsilon - A small utility package that depends on tools too recent for Twisted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231312.n4NDCGpm020283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446989 --- Comment #6 from Mauricio Teixeira 2009-05-23 09:12:14 EDT --- Package updated: http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-epsilon.spec http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-epsilon-0.5.12-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 13:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446991] Review Request: python-coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231313.n4NDD14S020338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446991 --- Comment #5 from Mauricio Teixeira 2009-05-23 09:13:00 EDT --- Package updated http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-coherence.spec http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-coherence-0.6.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 13:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 09:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446990] Review Request: python-axiom - An in-process object-relational database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231311.n4NDBWCk020188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446990 --- Comment #1 from Mauricio Teixeira 2009-05-23 09:11:30 EDT --- Package updated http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-axiom.spec http://mteixeira.webset.net/mock/python-axiom-0.5.31-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 14:03:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 10:03:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] New: Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Summary: Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-charis-compact-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Charis SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters. Charis is similar to Bitstream Charter, one of the first fonts designed specifically for laser printers. It is highly readable and holds up well in less-than-ideal reproduction environments. It also has a full set of styles ? regular, italic, bold, bold italic ? and so is more useful in general publishing than Doulos SIL. Charis is a serif proportionally spaced font optimized for readability in long printed documents. The Charis SIL Compact fonts were derived from Charis SIL using SIL TypeTuner, by setting the ?Line spacing? feature to ?Tight?, and they cannot be TypeTuned again. They may exhibit some diacritics clipping on screen (but should print fine). See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIL_Charis_Compact_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 14:17:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 10:17:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231417.n4NEH8kK029314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-23 10:17:06 EDT --- Have you tried to coordinate with the people working on bug #458430 ? They seem to have done quite a lot of work already (but stalled :() -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 15:16:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:16:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231516.n4NFGtAW015419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Bug 502191 depends on bug 502189, which changed state. Bug 502189 Summary: Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 15:16:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:16:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502189] Review Request: libglpng - Toolkit for loading PNG images as OpenGL textures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231516.n4NFGslZ015393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502189 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-23 11:16:52 EDT --- Imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 15:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 11:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231557.n4NFvofm016411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-23 11:57:48 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reported within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 16:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231610.n4NGAuvZ027125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 --- Comment #5 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-23 12:10:55 EDT --- Nobody had any clue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 16:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231631.n4NGVt6t031820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #21 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-23 12:31:53 EDT --- My scratch build with %cmake does not seem to have such rpmlint warning http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1368413/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 16:31:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:31:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453815] Review Request: globus-* - The Globus Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231631.n4NGVTmV023770@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453815 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Bug 453815 depends on bug 453850, which changed state. Bug 453850 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl - Openssl Library (virtual GPT glue package) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453850 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Bug 453815 depends on bug 453854, which changed state. Bug 453854 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-ssl - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy SSL Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453854 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453853, which changed state. Bug 453853 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-openssl-error - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Error Handling https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453853 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453855, which changed state. Bug 453855 Summary: Review Request: globus-openssl-module - Globus Toolkit - Globus OpenSSL Module Wrapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453855 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453856, which changed state. Bug 453856 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-cert-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Cert Utils Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453856 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453857, which changed state. Bug 453857 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-sysconfig - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI System Config Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453857 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453858, which changed state. Bug 453858 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453861, which changed state. Bug 453861 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-credential - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Credential Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453861 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 453815 depends on bug 453862, which changed state. Bug 453862 Summary: Review Request: globus-gsi-proxy-core - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Core Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453862 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 16:33:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:33:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231633.n4NGXJSX032046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jani at mikkonen.biz | |) --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-23 12:33:17 EDT --- Setting NEEDINFO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 16:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 12:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231640.n4NGeRnF025601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-23 12:40:26 EDT --- Chris, are you going to sponsor Yanko? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 18:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 14:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231825.n4NIPk43024950@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 --- Comment #11 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-23 14:25:44 EDT --- There are "kbattleship" in kdegames, should that be renamed too? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 19:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 15:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905231928.n4NJSnI4006656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #10 from David Hannequin 2009-05-23 15:28:48 EDT --- Hi, New spec file and SRPM with the remarks Jan Klepek. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/redmine/redmine-0.8.4-8.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 20:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 16:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905232050.n4NKoQ1Z016947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Lucian Langa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Lucian Langa 2009-05-23 16:50:23 EDT --- thank you for the update. test suite has been fixed, binary name has been renamed and symlinks are created properly. this package is: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 22:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468753] Review Request: nss-myhostname - glibc plugin for local system host name resolution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905232203.n4NM3GXk009150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468753 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Lennart Poettering 2009-05-23 18:03:14 EDT --- Now commited to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 22:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905232208.n4NM8QKh010310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sven at lank.es Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 22:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905232221.n4NMLlXA013359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2009-05-23 18:21:45 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: f11/x86_64 [!] Rpmlint output: source RPM: empty mod_log_post.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 1) binary RPM:empty [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type:GPLv2 with exceptions [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 817b86c6040fd64b21b66f7fc7ab6b19926847c8 mod_log_post-0.1.0.tar.gz [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [-] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: f10/x86_64 [x] Package functions as described. [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Please fix the tab issue in the spec-file before importing. **** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 22:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905232234.n4NMY4bZ006329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-23 18:34:03 EDT --- Sven, thank you very much for doing the review. Just as a note: I got told by Thorsten and Christoph, that fixes always should happen after import, that these changes can be also tracked by the community. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_log_post Short Description: Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 22:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 18:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501433] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Calendar-Mayan - Mayan Long Count Calendar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905232248.n4NMmoeN008501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501433 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-23 18:48:49 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 23 23:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 19:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502323] New: Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 Summary: Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstr actSearch OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch-0.08-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides a SQL::Abstract search method for Class::DBI. It is similar to Class::DBI::AbstractSearch, but allows you to search and sort by fields from joined tables. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1373749 Additional Comment: This is a new optional testing dep of DBIx::Class. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 00:29:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 20:29:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240029.n4O0TtZ7023171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #38 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-23 20:29:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > > (In reply to comment #35) > > > Is there many differences between 0.1.0 stable and the today's snapshot. > > > > Is this a question or an affirmative? > yes, it's a question. The official release is now the 315. Therefore, it is equal to the snapshot I used on my previous message. SRPMS URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/yafaray-0.1.0.315-1.fc10.src.rpm > > > > given user), so this is aimed to be > > > > > > > I did not change this yet. I have to think what to do. > Probably need to be tought along with upstream (blender, yafaray) advices. The symbolic links are being created in ~/.blender/scripts just fine. I have deleted them many times and they are always automatically recreated. For instance: lrwxrwxrwx 1 roma 40 2009-05-23 21:14 yafaray_ui.py -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py lrwxrwxrwx 1 roma 40 2009-05-23 21:14 yaf_export.py -> /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py The plugins seems to have been installed in the appropriate locations, according to Jochen Schmitt, suggestions. The .so and the plugins were once in the same directories, but I was asked to move them. What exactly are you concerns? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 01:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240121.n4O1L1ZG007061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 21:21:00 EDT --- drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 01:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240118.n4O1IJin006500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-23 21:18:18 EDT --- Package: drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Package: drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete 2372 (drbdlinks): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. 2373 (drbdlinks): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 01:21:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:21:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240121.n4O1L5pg030339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-23 21:21:04 EDT --- drbdlinks-1.17-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/drbdlinks-1.17-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 01:44:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:44:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240144.n4O1irSD010045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2009-05-23 21:44:53 EDT --- [pass] source files match upstream: 6bf9519eaebc3c353c9b234fee2c6761de4ceddb63f705f9d52bbf17816558a5 SOURCES/repoze.who-friendlyform-1.0b3.tar.gz [pass] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [pass] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [pass] dist tag is present. [pass] build root is correct. (%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) is the recommended value, but not the only one) [pass] license field matches the actual license. [pass] license is open source-compatible. BSD [pass]latest version is being packaged. 1.0b3 [pass] BuildRequires are proper. [pass] compiler flags are appropriate. [pass] %clean is present. [pass] package installs properly. (it appears to, although I do not have a very good test case) [pass]rpmlint is silent. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [pass] final provides and requires are sane: provides python-repoze-who-friendlyform = 1.0-0.1.b3.fc10 requires python(abi) = 2.5 python-repoze-who >= 1.0 python-zope-interface rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 [?]%check is present and all tests pass: %check # Tests fail? # PYTHONPATH=$(pwd) nosetests what do these comments mean? do the tests fail, if so why? [pass]owns the directories it creates. [pass]doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [pass]no duplicates in %files. [pass]file permissions are appropriate. [pass] code, not content. [pass] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [pass] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [pass not a GUI app]desktop files valid and installed properly. This gets my approval, if you do not see the %check section as a problem. This should be clarified in the comment as to what is going on. This was not built in mock as python-repoze-who has not made its way into the repos yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 01:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 21:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240145.n4O1j8tC001185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 02:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 22:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240245.n4O2jYgf018694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2009-05-23 22:45:33 EDT --- [pass] source files match upstream: 62ff8edc30992cd2efc42fd973252c9deddfe29b2a53b7cf903743edcb356ab8 repoze.who-testutil-1.0rc1.tar.gz [pass] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [pass] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [pass] dist tag is present. [pass] build root is correct. %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [?] license field matches the actual license. the license shown is BSD, but the actual license is a BSD like license is this ok. http://www.repoze.org/LICENSE.txt [?]license is open source-compatible. see above [?]license text not included upstream. setup.py in the source says that http://www.repoze.org/LICENSE.txt must be distributed with it. [pass] latest version is being packaged. [pass] BuildRequires are proper. [pass] compiler flags are appropriate. [pass] %clean is present. package builds in mock. (cannot do this due to dep not yet in the repos) build fine outside of mock. [pass] package installs properly. [pass] rpmlint is silent. 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [pass] final provides and requires are sane: rpm -qp --requires ../RPMS/noarch/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.1.rc1.fc10.noarch.rpm python(abi) = 2.5 python-paste-deploy python-repoze-who python-zope-interface rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(PartialHardlinkSets) <= 4.0.4-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpm -qp --provides ../RPMS/noarch/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.1.rc1.fc10.noarch.rpm python-repoze-who-testutil = 1.0-0.1.rc1.fc10 [broken] %check is present and all tests pass: Has upstream been informed that they do not work so that they can be fixed in future releases? [pass] owns the directories it creates. [pass] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [pass] no duplicates in %files. [pass] file permissions are appropriate. [pass] code, not content. [pass] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [pass] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. [pass not a GUI app] desktop files valid and installed properly. Take a look at the license comments that I made. I think it is fine, and if it looks right to use I APPROVE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 03:54:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 23:54:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240354.n4O3sRos019475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |bashton at brennanashton.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |bashton at brennanashton.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Brennan Ashton 2009-05-23 23:54:26 EDT --- [pass] source files match upstream: sha256sum repoze.what-pylons-1.0.tar.gz fdf1453c99a290215646d869fb44bbf6652dd103787e7da84f1b5dc0964bf2fd repoze.what-pylons-1.0.tar.gz [pass] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [pass] specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. [pass] dist tag is present. [pass] build root is correct. [pass]license field matches the actual license. [pass] license is open source-compatible. BSD license text not included upstream. [pass]latest version is being packaged. 1.0 [pass] BuildRequires are proper. [pass] compiler flags are appropriate. [pass] %clean is present. package builds in mock. Has requires that are not in repos yet but builds with local builds of them. [pass] package installs properly. I will finish this a little later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 04:26:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 00:26:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240426.n4O4QFjA002349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-24 00:26:14 EDT --- Review: + rpmlint is silent: [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ rpmlint flickcurl- flickcurl-1.10-2.fc11.ppc.rpm flickcurl-1.10-2.fc11.src.rpm flickcurl-debuginfo-1.10-2.fc11.ppc.rpm flickcurl-devel-1.10-2.fc11.ppc.rpm [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ rpmlint flickcurl-* 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Sulaco Desktop]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec +/- The package meets the Packaging Guidelines, except one issue with owning directories - see below. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source: [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ md5sum flickcurl-1.10.tar.gz* 9d952990fd13a8beebbffe58061bbd0f flickcurl-1.10.tar.gz 9d952990fd13a8beebbffe58061bbd0f flickcurl-1.10.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1374032 + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package calls ldconfig in %post and %postun. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. So, I advice you to make the following change in "%files devel" section: - {_datadir}/gtk-doc/html + {_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/* + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissable content. + No extremely large documentation files + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + Header files are be in a -devel package. + No static libraries. - The sub-package containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Yes, I know, that this made autimatically with modern rpm versions, but a) this rule still exists, b) and someone may try to rebuild your spec on systems with older rpm (EPEL, for example) + The library files that end in .so (without suffix) are in a -devel package. + devel packages requires the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} + The packages does NOT contain any .la libtool archives + Not a GUI application + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Summary: * Please change "%files devel" section in order not to own entire {_datadir}/gtk-doc/html * Add BR pkgconfig to devel sub-package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 06:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 02:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240647.n4O6lXFE022186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 --- Comment #20 from Axel Thimm 2009-05-24 02:47:29 EDT --- It still is on the agenda, but I'm aging with it and someday either me or this review will die of age :( There are probably not that many educators or other people with needs that this package addresses. Having poured my pessimism into this report, you are welcome to review it! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 08:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 04:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240824.n4O8O9dT009665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-24 04:24:07 EDT --- Hi guys, nice to see gearman in Fedora, however could you please take the time to test the package a little bit? The are several bugs in the init script: [ -z "${PIDFILE}" ] && pidfile = "/var/run/gearmand/gearmand.pid" Two bugs here: the directory /var/run/gearmand is not created by the package and syntax error: no space around the = sign. More bugs: gearmand=/usr/bin/gearmand gearmand is install in /usr/sbin not /usr/bin Might be a bug: # config: /etc/sysconfig/gearmand this file is not shipped in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240916.n4O9GWwl026790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:16:31 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/flickcurl.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/flickcurl-1.10-2.fc10.src.rpm Fixed both issues. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487148] Review Request: gearmand - A distributed job system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240917.n4O9HigX017650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487148 --- Comment #10 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-24 05:17:43 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. I'll fix these issues ASAP. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:17:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:17:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240917.n4O9HZnj017610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:17:34 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/flickcurl.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/flickcurl-1.10-3.fc10.src.rpm Sorry for typo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:22:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:22:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240922.n4O9Mbd6027703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-24 05:22:36 EDT --- Ok, this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240921.n4O9L3Ks018302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2009-05-24 05:21:02 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-4.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-4.fc10.src.rpm >* Regarding %install section - you may shorten it a bit by replacing Done. > The %build section still doesn't honour %optflags. You should fix your spec in the following way: I added optflags, but the macro doesn't (on my system) contain -fPIC, therefore removing PIC causes errors when running rpmlint hence I now have echo "OPT=%{optflags} -fPIC" >> make.settings.local In any case, duplicate -fPICs are not going to cause any harm when seen by GCC. >You also don't need to explicitly install doc-files. Just enumerate them in %files section properly. Doc section updated. > Consider adding README and TROUBLESHOOTING to %doc. Done. * Sun May 24 2009 1.2.1-4 - Used doc macro to install docs previously manually installed - Added README and TROUBLESHOOTING to docs - Added otpflags macro to build settings - Use "install" program rather than cp for the install of lib RPM Lint: $ rpmlint -vi stxxl.spec ../SRPMS/stxxl-1.2.1-4.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-1.2.1-4.fc10.i386.rpm stxxl.src: I: checking stxxl.i386: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240934.n4O9Y146020176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:34:00 EDT --- ping ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240931.n4O9VXaZ019995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:31:32 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flickcurl Short Description: C library for the Flickr API Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240935.n4O9Zmcc029699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:35:47 EDT --- ping :) ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240934.n4O9YHPe029197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:34:16 EDT --- ping ?:) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240934.n4O9YetX029236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:34:39 EDT --- ping ?:) Thanks for review, bit impatient! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:36:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:36:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240936.n4O9ajUI020765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:36:44 EDT --- I have anyway confirmed with upstream ... that tests need lot of work and they have wrong dependency over other package in stack .. which otherwise make no sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240942.n4O9gdj6030617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:42:38 EDT --- Actually .. it has been long time for Mayavi stack in review .... it is very import for Educational purposes for Engg Mechanical guys. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240946.n4O9k7GX031264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 09:45:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:45:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905240945.n4O9j9IO022021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 05:45:07 EDT --- ping ?:) ! The md5sum you put in the specfile is wrong. But you don't need to put an md5sum there anyway. Fixed. * Each package must consistently use macros: %{__python} needs to be converted to python Fixed. * The new guidelines prefer usage of %global over %define. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#System_Architecture Fixed. ? Is there a way of generating/packaging the API docs? How about the docs directory? I don't see an easy way. ? How about the examples directory? Fixed. http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsGUI.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 11:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 07:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479951] Review Request: iniparser - a library for parsing ini-style files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241112.n4OBCoKg010864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479951 Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #15 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) 2009-05-24 07:12:48 EDT --- Imported and built, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] New: Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Summary: Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-markdown.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-markdown-1.0.1m-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a PHP implementation of John Gruber's Markdown. This is a Python implementation of John Gruber's Markdown. It is almost completely compliant with the reference implementation. It is required for laconica. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241238.n4OCcfZS023914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 --- Comment #12 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-24 08:38:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > There are "kbattleship" in kdegames, should that be renamed too? Yes, please open a separate bug against kdegames. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241244.n4OCi9B0016332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 08:44:08 EDT --- mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:45:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:45:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] New: Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki Alias: mojomojo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Summary: Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MojoMojo/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: iarnell at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo-0.999029-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Mojomojo is a sort of content managment system, borrowing many concepts from wikis and blogs. It allows you to maintain a full tree-structure of pages, and to interlink them in various ways. It has full version support, so you can always go back to a previous version and see what's changed with an easy AJAX- based diff system. There are also a bunch of other features like bult-in fulltext search, live AJAX preview of editing, and RSS feeds for every wiki page. *rt-0.09 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:55:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241255.n4OCtuoC026887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 08:55:55 EDT --- mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:57:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:57:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241257.n4OCvQPr027007@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 08:57:25 EDT --- mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241256.n4OCuZnC018664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 08:56:34 EDT --- mingw32-libsoup-2.26.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libsoup-2.26.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241255.n4OCt0nn018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 08:54:59 EDT --- mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 12:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 08:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241256.n4OCuZXD018652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 --- Comment #13 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-24 08:56:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Yes, please open a separate bug against kdegames. Done: bug 502359. My suggestion is to use name like ?Sea fight? or ?Natal battle? as replacement for this game too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241300.n4OD0iIX019338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 09:00:43 EDT --- mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241304.n4OD4Tcu028102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-24 09:04:28 EDT --- No koji build at the minute due to bug #473551 (rrdtool dejavu font dependency problems again), but the noarch rpms are available too from the same location. And there is probably enough in the spec alone to raise a few issues (I've tried to package this as a complete out-of-the-box web application - so much more than a normal perl package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241308.n4OD8sfr028924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 09:08:54 EDT --- mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241310.n4ODAWha021047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-24 09:10:31 EDT --- Oh, and unfortunately, it doesn't quite run straight out of the box due to bug #502273 - needs a chmod 755 /var/run/httpd (or chgrp apache and chmod 750 if you prefer). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241320.n4ODKLhj022568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) | --- Comment #30 from David Timms 2009-05-24 09:20:17 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345244) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345244) rpmbuild failure on F11- (rawhide) (In reply to comment #29) > New upload > SRPM: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba-0.9.5-6.fc10.src.rpm > SPEC: ftp://zorba-xquery.com/zorba.spec > I see that cmake-2.6.4-1 is now in updates for Fedora 10. This version fixes > the bug discussed in the previous comments. So I fixed the zorba.spec file > to require this version and things build fine for me on Fedora 10. No go on F11- see attached end of compile. > I had gcc 4.4 installed in /usr/local on my development machine and the > sources required a few patches to compile with that version. So I've > included them with this update. These patches do not break the build with > older versions of gcc. I've triggered a test build on koji: (f10-updates) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1374263 ps. package versions. The upstream seems to have gone: ls -1 zorba.spec-0.9.21-2 zorba.spec-0.9.21-3 zorba.spec-0.9.4-2 zorba.spec-0.9.5-2 zorba.spec-0.9.5-6 $ rpmdev-vercmp 0 0.9.21 2 0 0.9.4 2 0:0.9.21-2 is newer You would have to be careful with those, I think to ensure that 0.9.4 was packaged as 0.9.21-4.4 or something (to avoid epochs). Alternately it might have been better knowing what we know now to package 0.9.21-1 as 0.9.2-3.21 and 0.9.21-2 as 0.9.2-4.21 and 0.9.21-3 as 0.9.2-5.21. or 0.9.21-1 as 0.9.2.1-3.21 and so forth. Otherwise rpm upgrade paths wont work. More on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241322.n4ODMiKK031235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #82 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-24 09:22:39 EDT --- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 13:23:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 09:23:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241323.n4ODNr2i031376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #31 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-24 09:23:51 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 14:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 10:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241433.n4OEXepT001127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |giallu at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 14:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 10:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241434.n4OEYamF009820@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |giallu at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 15:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241506.n4OF6oew007487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #1 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-05-24 11:06:49 EDT --- Few items to check: * rpmlint is not clean: rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-x86_64/result/php-markdown-1.0.1m-1.fc10.src.rpm php-markdown.src:20: W: setup-not-quiet php-markdown.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 12, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. add -q to the %setup line and file the tab/space issue * php and unzip are not needed to build, php can stay as a Require: tough * you may consider using the "install" command instead of mkdir+cp the last one is not a "must". Fix the first two items and I think I can approve the package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 15:24:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:24:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241524.n4OFOnZw019581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #8 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-24 11:24:47 EDT --- Jan Klepek? Yes, I am still here. But you know Shutter depends on perl-Goo-Canvas and perl-Gnome2-Wnck. So I want to finish the submitting process of these two package. Now the process will be end soon. Later I will get into this process again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 15:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 11:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241535.n4OFZRgx022290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tummy.com, | |liangsuilong at gmail.com --- Comment #13 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-24 11:35:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Gnome2-Wnck Short Description: Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit Owners: liangsuilong Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: liangsuilong Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241629.n4OGTrCn025733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #21 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-24 12:29:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > - and changing "tetris" word on script name and > in documents (mentioned in spot's comment 5) Is your mean that I should rename perltetris.pl as tetris.pl? I do not think it is needed, Because if it runs well, we will not need to change anything. Also I think that we just need to add what we change into Changelog is OK.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] New: Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-hunspell.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-hunspell-1.2.8-6.fc11.src.rpm Description: Hunspell is a spell checker and morphological analyzer library and program designed for languages with rich morphology and complex word compounding or character encoding. Hunspell interfaces: Ispell-like terminal interface using Curses library, Ispell pipe interface, OpenOffice.org UNO module. This is the MinGW build of hunspell Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1374924 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241636.n4OGaic4027630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502388] New: Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502388 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-enchant - MinGW Windows Enchanting Spell Checking Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Depends on: 502387 Blocks: 499992 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-enchant.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-enchant-1.4.2-6.fc11.src.rpm Description: A library that wraps other spell checking backends. This is the MinGW build of enchant Koji scratch build: none yet because mingw32-hunspell isn't in Fedora yet Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241636.n4OGah10027604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |502388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241639.n4OGdHjt027987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-24 12:39:15 EDT --- My notes for this one (everything seems fine): - Koji rawhide build is fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1374872 - rpmlint globus-xio-gsi-driver-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored - The package contains libtool archives, but as documented, these are needed during runtime. ? sed -e 's!gssapi_error!globus_&!' -i pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in Did upstream adapt to this namespace change? It looks like all the depending parts (to globus-gssapi-error) need to be modified. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-xio-gsi-driver) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 16:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241639.n4OGdsJ9028161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-24 12:39:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > - and changing "tetris" word on script name and > > in documents (mentioned in spot's comment 5) > > Is your mean that I should rename perltetris.pl as tetris.pl? > > I do not think it is needed, Because if it runs well, we will not need to > change anything. This is not related to whether this program works well or not, but to legal issue (see spot's comment 5) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:05:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241705.n4OH5utm009689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(sergio.pasra at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual 2009-05-24 13:05:55 EDT --- + source files match upstream: + package meets naming and versioning guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. + compiler flags are appropriate. + %clean is present. + package installs properly + rpmlint is silent. + no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. + owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. If you plan to build this package in EL-4, please reread the python guidelines. Before EL-5 you have to write the python-abi dependency explicitly. Furthermore, .pyo files have to be created by hand. Package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:11:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:11:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241711.n4OHB7Xq010953@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |th0br0 at mkdir.name --- Comment #1 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-24 13:11:05 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: [x] F10/i386 [!] Rpmlint output: Source RPM: [makerpm at hattan rubygem-mongrel_cluster]$ rpmlint rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Binary RPM(s): [makerpm at hattan rubygem-mongrel_cluster]$ rpmlint rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-1.fc10.noarch.rpm rubygem-mongrel_cluster.noarch: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/mongrel_cluster rubygem-mongrel_cluster.noarch: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/mongrel_cluster rubygem-mongrel_cluster.noarch: W: incoherent-init-script-name mongrel_cluster 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. [x] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2 or Ruby [x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. SHA1SUM of package: 7ff77538842c97b363137c471903f7e3 [x] Package is not known to require ExcludeArch [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. [x] Package consistently uses macros. [x] Package contains code, or permissable content. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Fully versioned dependency in subpackages, if present. [x] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [-] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Latest version is packaged. [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Tested on: F10/i386 [-] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Tested on: - [x] Package functions as described. [x] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files is correct. [-] File based requires are sane. Remaining issues: Fix the init script issues, we can ignore the incoherent-init-script-name, but the other two should be fixed Each Ruby package must indicate the Ruby ABI version it depends on with a line like Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 Install docs to /usr/share/doc/-/ rather than the respective rubygems path According to the Homepage, mongrel_cluster >= 0.2.0 is required. I take it that this mongrel_cluster is this package? Otherwise, railsmachine (the project linked to when clicking on mongrel_cluster) has not yet been packaged. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241711.n4OHBl2g003021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |th0br0 at mkdir.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241722.n4OHMvjf005545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-24 13:22:56 EDT --- I can't see a pointer in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby for using %doc rather rubygems path for documentation. Upstream is a bit confusing, you don't need railsmachine, mongrel_cluster as it is packaged here, works and has all the features already. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241721.n4OHL4U5005141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |sergio.pasra at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sergio.pasra at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241730.n4OHUmqK007379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-24 13:30:47 EDT --- Well, we usually leaves documents installed under %geminstdir as they are and does not move them to %_defaultdocdir. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241733.n4OHX8TH015925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-24 13:33:07 EDT --- URL is obsolete, should be http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/dataspace/dav/wiki/Main/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 17:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 13:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499992] Review Request: mingw32-webkitgtk - MinGW Windows web content engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241758.n4OHweZf013671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499992 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-24 13:58:39 EDT --- The libraries enchant and hunspell (dependency for enchant) are now packaged and ready for review (bug 502388 and bug 502387). Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-webkitgtk-1.1.7-1.fc11.src.rpm * Fri May 22 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 1.1.7-1 - Update to 1.1.7 * Sun May 10 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 1.1.6-1 - Update to 1.1.6 - Updated the patches to apply cleanly against version 1.1.6 - Renamed the package to mingw32-webkitgtk - Merged the changes from the native webkitgtk package up to 1.1.6-1 - Added a BR: mingw32-enchant (required as of version 1.1.6) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 18:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241800.n4OI00qE021762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #13 from Jess Portnoy 2009-05-24 13:59:59 EDT --- Hello, All changes were applied as suggested. The new src.rpm can be downloaded from: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-11-2.fc11.src.rpm I'm actually pretty fond of using macros but if you see a good reason not to, I'm willing to modify the spec file accordingly. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 18:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241813.n4OIDgS7024976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-24 14:13:41 EDT --- Oh, okay. I was unsure about that as rubygem-sqlite3-ruby had them installed in %_defaultdocdir (installed there by default anyway) Thanks for clearing that up, it was not listed on the wiki page -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 18:32:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:32:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241832.n4OIW1jW029361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 14:32:00 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/php-markdown.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc10.src.rpm Fixed both -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 18:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241840.n4OIeA0j023290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-05-24 14:40:09 EDT --- meh, it's a redirect to a wiki (which I'd venture could very well change). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 18:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 14:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241847.n4OIlRZ2024776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-24 14:47:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Hello, > > All changes were applied as suggested. > The new src.rpm can be downloaded from: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2-11-2.fc11.src.rpm What about the spec file? I'd suggest using something else than the project home page, as the review process may take many steps before everything is in order. > I'm actually pretty fond of using macros but if you see a good reason not to, > I'm willing to modify the spec file accordingly. Well, it's not an official guideline; I just think it isn't good style as nothing is gained from using the macros: KISS! Do you still need a sponsor? I can sponsor you, if you show me you know the Fedora Packaging guidelines. Thus you need to do a couple of informal reviews (as Christian did on this package), and make at least one another package submission. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 19:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241914.n4OJEW3Y006177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-24 15:14:31 EDT --- Ok, the package could build on koji, so I can APPROVE it. But it may be nice, if you can clarify the license state with the upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 19:27:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:27:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501353] Review Request: ascii - Interactive ASCII name and synonym chart In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241927.n4OJRCM2001752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501353 --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-24 15:27:11 EDT --- Please wrtie $RPM_BUILD_ROOT or $(RPM_BUILD_ROOT) instead of $"RPM_BUILD_ROOT" Please create a proper Buildroot defintion https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag The build step in your package doesn't use the compiler flags defined in $RPM_OPT_FLAGS. the Debuginfo package doesn't contains the source files of your package. This may be happen because the build step doesn't use the compiler flags defined in $RPM_OPT_FLAGS Good: + Rpmlint is silent on source rpm + Rpmlint is silent on binary rpm + rpmlint is silent on debuginfo rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 19:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905241942.n4OJgYS4012873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-24 15:42:33 EDT --- Good: + Could download package via spectool -g + Packaged sources matches with upstream (md5sum: aadee8b6e5c7d99a6ff0a66fca8032dd) + Scratch build on koni works fine. + No complaints from rpmlint for source rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for binary rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for debuginfo rpm + Debuginfo package contains sources I will APPROVE this package, but keep in mind to request only branches for devel and F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 20:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242002.n4OK2rp0009765@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Gianluca Sforna changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Gianluca Sforna 2009-05-24 16:02:51 EDT --- Review: * package name follows naming guidelines * License (BSD) is good and matches actual one * License text is present and correctly packaged * sources matches upstream ( MD5 0111093efcb81e455e7bbd959d4cff54 ) * rpmlint is silent * build fine in mock for F10 APPROVED just a couple of final remarks. Since you included the non numeric part in the version field, please pay attention to future upgrades and use rpmdev-vercmp to check if the upgrade path is correct. There are worpress refernces in the code. I don't know if this is included/used by default in WP, but if this is the case the WP maintainer should be requiring this package instead. It would be nice if you discuss with him about the issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 20:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 16:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242052.n4OKqh2S021165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #39 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-24 16:52:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > The symbolic links are being created in ~/.blender/scripts > just fine. I have deleted them many times and they are always automatically > recreated. For instance: > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 roma 40 2009-05-23 21:14 yafaray_ui.py -> > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py > lrwxrwxrwx 1 roma 40 2009-05-23 21:14 yaf_export.py -> > /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py > > The plugins seems to have been installed in the appropriate locations, > according to Jochen Schmitt, suggestions. The .so and the plugins were once in > the same directories, but I was asked to move them. > > What exactly are you concerns? I assume, that you ask why I create the symlinks in `/.blender/scripts? the answer is, that blender only recorgnise the script and plugins which are available on this place. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 21:09:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:09:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242109.n4OL9I5l032682@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #40 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-24 17:09:17 EDT --- > > I assume, that you ask why I create the symlinks in `/.blender/scripts? No. I know that. > > the answer is, that blender only recorgnise the script and plugins which are > available on this place. This part is just fine. The problem, as I understand, are the shared libraries x python scripts: /usr/lib64/libyafarayplugin.so /usr/lib64/libyafarayqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafqt.so /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/_yafrayinterface.so /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_export.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_light.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_material.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_object.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yaf_texture.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafaray_ui.py /usr/share/blender/scripts/yafqt.py The shared libraries are architecture dependent, but the scripts are not (but they reference the libraries). Therefore, they can be in the same directory (as they were in previous versions), or in separate directories as they are now. The package seems to be working just fine the way it is now, and I am going to make them available soon in Yafaray forum, so people can test them. If there is a Fedora guideline for this situation, please let me know. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 21:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242131.n4OLVa1O005605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #5 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-24 17:31:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Okay, after adding libjpeg-devel builds. > > This is fixed upstream. Thanks for pointing it out! This is included in new upstream release, 0.4.1 > > However, the package uses its own versions of libmetalink and uri, which is not > > allowed. You have already packaged libmetalink; there isn't a package of uri > > yet. You need to make one and patch this package to use the packaged versions > > of libmetalink and uri. > > > > > > https://gna.org/projects/uri/ > > I found out that uri has not been maintained for 8 years, but a similar library > called uriparser is actively developed. > > The current plan upstream is to switch to uriparser ( > http://uriparser.sourceforge.net/ ) which is already packaged for Fedora & > other distributions. Upstream has switched from uri to uriparser. The package no longer uses its own version of libmetalink. * Sun May 24 2009 Ant Bryan - 0.4.1-1 - Upstream release 0.4.1, change from liburi to uriparser - Add BuildRequires: uriparser-devel - Remove BuildRequires: libjpeg-devel Spec URL: http://pastebin.ca/1433317 SRPM URL: http://www.metalinker.org/mirrors/mulk/mulk-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 21:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 17:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498248] Review Request: viewmol - An open source graphical front end for computational chemistry programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242130.n4OLUNVU029638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498248 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-24 17:30:22 EDT --- REVIEW for viewmol-2.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm FIX - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. rpmlint Downloads/viewmol-2.4.1-2.fc12.i586.rpm viewmol.i586: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/viewmol/readdmol.awk viewmol.i586: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 c88cc5641bffc14d749e9759a1c813ac OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. ??? - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. n/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK - optflags honored OK - timestamps preserved Issues: - the mime scriptlet is not sane. There is no way to uninstall the magic bits - does readdmol.awk really need exec perms? - does it make sense to package docs and examples in a noarch -doc package - desktop file lacks categories. I suggest Education;Science;Chemistry;Physics - there also is another issue with desktop that you could fix. + desktop-file-install --dir=/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/viewmol-2.4.1-2.fc10.i386/usr/share/applications kde/applications/viewmol.desktop /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/viewmol-2.4.1-2.fc10.i386/usr/share/applications/viewmol.desktop: warning: value "viewmol.png" for key "Icon" in group "Desktop Entry" is an icon name with an extension, but there should be no extension as described in the Icon Theme Specification if the value is not an absolute path -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 22:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 18:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242205.n4OM5ITQ013060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-24 18:05:16 EDT --- Sorry it took so long. (In reply to comment #2) > No, it is quite standard to ship executable scripts in %doc, as the program > works without them; they're just examples of use. You can ship scripts in %doc if they are not executable, so no problem here. But IMO you should consider packaging the Examples separately, it's 9 MB one the disk and as you said people don't necessarily need the files. REVIEW FOR towhee-6.2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/towhee-* 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 f911980711593a07b6e80e147eb03339 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. FIX? - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. OK - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OTHER Items: OK - timestamps are preserved OK - optflags are honored Issues: - does not build in rawhide, because there is no openmpi-devel anymore, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=99188 - I suggest to make the common package noarch. - separate doc package? - use pushd/popd instead cd/cd .. Add a conditional openmpi on F-12. The rest is minor, the package is APPROVED by cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 22:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 18:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] New: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Summary: Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at christoph-wickert.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession.spec SRPM URL: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: LXSession is a standard-compliant X11 session manager with shutdown/ reboot/suspend support via HAL. In connection with gdm it also supports user switching. LXSession is derived from XSM and is developed as default X11 session manager of LXDE, the Lightweight X11 Desktop Environment. Though being part of LXDE, it's totally desktop-independent and only has few dependencies. Note: This is a re-review because the package was renamed upstream from lxsession-lite, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 22:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 18:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242251.n4OMput1021025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 22:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 18:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242251.n4OMpvVZ013114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 22:58:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 18:58:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242258.n4OMwG9D021889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 22:58:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 18:58:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242258.n4OMwDmq021861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-24 18:58:12 EDT --- Looks good. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1368784 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): c2a7512bc98f7c67d014b4646af79e95afa55bdf Lingua-Flags-0.05.tar.gz c2a7512bc98f7c67d014b4646af79e95afa55bdf Lingua-Flags-0.05.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Lingua::Flags) = 0.05 perl-Lingua-Flags = 0.05-1.fc12 ====> requires for perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(base) perl(MIME::Base64) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) =====> perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc12.src.rpm perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 23:03:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:03:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242303.n4ON3u5X022877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #5 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-24 19:03:56 EDT --- How to handle subsys, if the initscript starts for each configuration file an own cluster (bunch of processes)? Note that each "cluster" can be independet of the other clusters started and stopped. When looking around, there's either broken subsys handling (subsys created if only one/all is started/stopped) or simply none if a similar behaviour exists. Ideas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 24 23:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 19:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905242316.n4ONGZmH025573@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-05-24 19:16:34 EDT --- PHP Markdown can work as a optional plug-in for Wordpress. I will inform maintainer. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-markdown Short Description: Markdown implementation in PHP Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 02:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250208.n4P28x6X009630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-24 22:08:57 EDT --- FIX - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint Desktop/awesfx-0.5.1c-1.src.rpm awesfx.src: W: non-coherent-filename awesfx-0.5.1c-1.src.rpm awesfx-0.5.1c-1.fc10.src.rpm OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. FIX - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ FIX - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 73f940279f909bfa5ad307d904bc88da OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. FIX - MUST: The package does not all directories that it creates OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK - SHOULD: uses opt_flags and smp_mflags Issues: - Package does not match the naming guidelines, Correct is version 0.5.1 release 1%{?dist} see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages - change License tag to GPLv2+, take a look at the source - You are not owning %{buildroot}/etc/alsa.d, and AFAIK that dir is not created by another package ether - this wont work %dir %{_datadir}/soundfonts/*.bnk - add INSTALL ="install -p" to make install to preserve timestamps of the soundbank files - I suggest to use install rather then cp so you can always be sure permissions are correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 02:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250231.n4P2VtBO021766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 22:31:54 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 02:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250231.n4P2VjxL021697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 22:31:44 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 02:31:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:31:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250231.n4P2VoWP021732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 22:31:49 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 02:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250231.n4P2Vfp8013472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-24 22:31:39 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10,wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250319.n4P3JXx6020695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250332.n4P3WWfT023459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-05-24 23:32:31 EDT --- Jussi: I am about to disconnect for the evening and will try and do the balance of this review shortly. However, wanted to give you a heads up on a problem: I grabbed source (5 times to make sure it wasn't something upstream) and the md5sum on all 5 of the copies is the same, and doesn't match source included in src.rpm: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum agedu-r8442.tar.gz* 7be87e9a6a8b26a7ef3fe80bc45b6792 agedu-r8442.tar.gz 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.1 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.2 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.3 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.4 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.5 As I said I'll try and have the rest of the review done tomorrow sometime. Cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250343.n4P3hDZv025272@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-24 23:43:12 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1370829 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url dcb5195cd172ceb5367599f7cb36e500c1ce7211 Carp-Clan-Share-0.013.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=7, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.02 sys + 0.16 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.26 CPU) + Package perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Carp::Clan::Share) = 0.013 Requires: perl(Carp::Clan) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250345.n4P3jCxa001522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250346.n4P3k9KT001831@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250345.n4P3jTv0001720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250345.n4P3jQHP001690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 --- Comment #2 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-24 23:45:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Carp-Clan-Share Short Description: Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502323] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250343.n4P3h5tf000835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-24 23:43:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1373749 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a81ed8446fb4c990211e203b08f98f472cb83774 Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch-0.08.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=0, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.03 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.09 CPU) + Package perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch-0.08-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Class::DBI::Plugin::DeepAbstractSearch) = 0.08 Requires: perl(SQL::Abstract) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250345.n4P3j6qA025931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-24 23:45:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Lingua-Flags Short Description: Provide small flag icons Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 03:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 23:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250354.n4P3sD5s003117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 KaiGai Kohei changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from KaiGai Kohei 2009-05-24 23:54:11 EDT --- Thanks for your reviewing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mod_selinux Short Description: Apache/SELinux plus module Owners: kaigai Branches: F-11 InitialCC: kaigai at ak.jp.nec.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:03:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:03:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250403.n4P43OUE005034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-25 00:03:23 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1375245 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3d6f4a0b716c834fa5236762c0fc0ec20517311a CharisSILCompact4.106.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Followed fonts packaging guidelines. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501831] Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250409.n4P49vvV006218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-25 00:09:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1367313 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b9566d407696277b272e7bc76c66c498415e0a4b testosterone-0.4.1.tgz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) You should contact upstream to add license text in tarball or in source files 2) you should use %global instead of %define in SPEC file. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:42:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:42:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250442.n4P4gmn2005520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 --- Comment #14 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-25 00:42:47 EDT --- Does anyone review my CVS request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250441.n4P4f5pm005143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #23 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-25 00:41:04 EDT --- OK.. But after I rename perltetris.pl, Should I create symbolic link whose name is perltetris.pl to connect the new file. I think that if some applications need perltetris.pl, it will appear some errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 04:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 00:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250453.n4P4rH9t008231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Parag 2009-05-25 00:53:14 EDT --- Ok. So no progress here and meantime I also forgot to look at new package queue and now I have submitted new package request for lcdf-typetools in review bug 501854. If submitter still interested then I will drop my request otherwise I will be happy to maintain this package. Hmm. Not much used TEX but I just want to have this package in fedora so if someone interested and knowing well TEX, he can maintain or co-maintain this package in review 501854. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 05:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502323] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250545.n4P5jOfc030230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 05:45:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502323] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250545.n4P5jNaf021830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-25 01:45:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch Short Description: SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 05:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 01:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250558.n4P5weW7001190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 01:58:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Jussi: > > I am about to disconnect for the evening and will try and do the balance of > this review shortly. However, wanted to give you a heads up on a problem: > > I grabbed source (5 times to make sure it wasn't something upstream) and the > md5sum on all 5 of the copies is the same, and doesn't match source included in > src.rpm: That's odd, I did use the upstream tarball. I've redownloaded the source and regenerated the src rpm, be sure to download it again before reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 06:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 02:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250641.n4P6fPJe004630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-25 02:41:23 EDT --- The namespace change was accepted upstream: http://viewcvs.globus.org/viewcvs.cgi/gsi/gssapi_error/source/pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in?r1=1.12&r2=1.13 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-xio-gsi-driver Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 06:58:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 02:58:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250658.n4P6wAnX016310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 07:02:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 03:02:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250702.n4P72jGJ017654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #24 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-25 03:02:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > OK.. > > But after I rename perltetris.pl, Should I create symbolic link whose name is > perltetris.pl to connect the new file. No. In such cases the application using this perl script needs modification on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 07:21:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 03:21:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250721.n4P7L2Rq014498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 03:20:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry it took so long. > > (In reply to comment #2) > > No, it is quite standard to ship executable scripts in %doc, as the program > > works without them; they're just examples of use. > > You can ship scripts in %doc if they are not executable, so no problem here. > But IMO you should consider packaging the Examples separately, it's 9 MB one > the disk and as you said people don't necessarily need the files. Done. > Add a conditional openmpi on F-12. The rest is minor, the package is APPROVED > by cwickert Ugh. I'll wait for the openmpi maintainers to add Provides: openmpi-devel (or provide a good excuse not to). Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: towhee Short Description: A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 07:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 03:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250730.n4P7UrCh025789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 03:30:51 EDT --- rpmlint output: mulk-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/mulk-0.4.1/src/uri_parser.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - Fix this in setup phase. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add THANKS and TODO. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK Fix the above before import to CVS. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 08:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 04:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250811.n4P8B6g2001691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #22 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-05-25 04:11:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > My scratch build with %cmake does not seem to have such rpmlint warning > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1368413/ This is pretty weird. I have a pretty much stock-standard Fedora 10 installation. The rpm building process (via "rpmbuild -ba armadillo.spec"), causes cmake to install files into "/root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/armadillo-0.6.11-4.fc10.x86_64/usr/". Afterwards the following scripts are run: + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-static-archive + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-comment-note Looking at "/usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip" (as installed on my system), we have this line: grep -v ' shared object,' | \ ... which means it explicitly does not strip shared objects. A more appropriate "/usr/lib/rpm/brp-strip-shared" exists, but this isn't being run (why?) Comparing your build log for x86_64 against mine, both use CXXFLAGS that contain "-O2 -g". The main differences appear after cmake installs files into $BUILDROOT. Specifically, the following scripts are run: + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /builddir/build/BUILD/armadillo-0.6.11 extracting debug info from /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc11.x86_64/usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.6.11 symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.6.11.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.debug symlinked /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.6.11.debug to /usr/lib/debug/usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.debug 52 blocks + /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-compress + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-static-archive /usr/bin/strip + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-strip-comment-note /usr/bin/strip /usr/bin/objdump + /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-java-repack-jars So what's going on here ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 08:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 04:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250821.n4P8LLJJ003705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-25 04:21:17 EDT --- Some notes for 0.2-1.61: * Versioning / creating tarball - If you want to rebase source tarball on svn repository, please follow: * To create tarball: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control * For versioning: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages * BR (BuildRequires) - This package does not build without "BR: cvs" http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1374931 - I guess "BR: gettext-devel" can be changed to "BR: gettext" and "BR: subversion" is not needed (once the tarball is created) (koji scratch build succeeds) - When perl module related packages are needed for BR, please avoid to use direct name of the package but use virtual name which the needed rpm provides: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides (i.e. change to "BuildRequires: perl(XML::Parser)" - "BR: glib2-devel" is redundant because gtk2-devel requires glib2-devel. * %configure usage - "--prefix=%{_prefix}" or so is not needed for %configure ! You can check what %configure actually does by $ rpm --eval %configure * desktop-file-utils usage - "desktop-file-validate" must be called for the files installed under %buildroot (i.e after "make install") * Keeping timestamps - Please consider to use ------------------------------------------------------------------ make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" ------------------------------------------------------------------ to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Documents ! This software is actually under GPLv2 (from the source codes), however "COPYING" file is GPLv3 text. - "ABOUT-NLS" is not useful for this package because this (usually) shows general information for transformation. * Desktop files - Usually desktop files should be installed under %_datadir/applications. Would you check if %_datadir/vcards-evo-daemon is the desired directory for desktop files to be installed for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 09:14:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 05:14:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905250914.n4P9ELxi013582@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-25 05:14:19 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sil-charis-compact-fonts Short Description: A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing Owners: nim Branches: F11 & devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 10:26:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 06:26:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251026.n4PAQMpR024757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #15 from Jess Portnoy 2009-05-25 06:26:19 EDT --- Hello, The spec file can be obtained from: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec About where it is hosted, it's OK, I have the ability to upload to this SF project whenever needed :) I actually do need a sponser and would appreciate your help. I will start performing informal reviews this weekend. I also have another submission here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 Which I expect to update shortly, the maintainer is about to release a new source ball. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 10:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 06:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251053.n4PArjGQ006386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 Jess Portnoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kernel01 at gmail.co | |m) | --- Comment #12 from Jess Portnoy 2009-05-25 06:53:43 EDT --- Hello, I got a new source release from the maintainer that should be OK. I'll prepare an RPM later this week and update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251206.n4PC6rQD024881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:06:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:06:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251206.n4PC6oG9016685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 08:06:48 EDT --- - Use %configure and make %{?_smp_mflags} if you have a very good reason not to (i.e. if they don't work). - NO STRIPPING!!! This is automatically done by rpm, which produces the -debuginfo package. - What does --copy-generic-name-to-name do in desktop-file-install? It's not documented. - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251206.n4PC6XRS016596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 08:06:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Hello, > The spec file can be obtained from: > http://downloads.sourceforge.net/argtable/argtable2.spec > > About where it is hosted, it's OK, I have the ability to upload to this SF > project whenever needed :) Well, I wouldn't publish anything temporary. Also you won't be able to do this for every package, so you should at least know how to use a www server to host your specs & srpms (be it fedoraproject or other). I don't like SF since it offers the spec file as binary instead of text. > I actually do need a sponser and would appreciate your help. > I will start performing informal reviews this weekend. > I also have another submission here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 Okay. Mail me or paste here links to the reviews you have made. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:38:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] New: Review Request: arista - Simple multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: arista - Simple multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Summary: Review Request: arista - Simple multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/arista.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/arista-0.9.1-1.src.rpm Description: A simple multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop. Arista focuses on being easy to use by making the complex task of encoding for various devices simple. Pick your input, pick your target device, choose a file to save to and go. Features include automatic discovery of DVD media and V4L devices, ripping from DVD, V4L devices, or files, a live quality preview, and included presets for the most popular devices currently in use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251251.n4PCp8KQ003546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Federico Hernandez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Federico Hernandez 2009-05-25 08:51:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: task Short Description: An open source, command-line, TODO list manager Owners: ultrafredde Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: s4504kr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 12:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 08:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251254.n4PCsdr6028629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #31 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-25 08:54:33 EDT --- The F11 build failure is a different issue (a GCC 4.4 issue in the Zorba source code, nothing to do with CMake). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 13:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251317.n4PDHLPa009379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #17 from Jess Portnoy 2009-05-25 09:17:20 EDT --- I'll mail you. About uploading to a server other than SF's, I have no objection but have no such server at my disposal. If I can get an account that enables uploading to the fedoraproject server, that would be great, am I authorized to do this with my current account? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 13:15:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:15:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251315.n4PDF9wN001239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-25 09:15:07 EDT --- Any update so far? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 13:30:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:30:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251330.n4PDUilF012133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 09:30:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > I'll mail you. > About uploading to a server other than SF's, I have no objection but have no > such server at my disposal. If I can get an account that enables uploading to > the fedoraproject server, that would be great, am I authorized to do this with > my current account? You should be able to do so with your FAS account once you are sponsored. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org For now SF is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 13:39:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:39:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226423] Merge Review: smartmontools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251339.n4PDdLDf006555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226423 --- Comment #6 from Michal Hlavinka 2009-05-25 09:39:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Any update so far? no, still no response and no change in the cvs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 13:42:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] New: Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dpierce at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine.spec SRPM URL: http://mcpierce.fedorapeople.org/rpms/rubygem-state_machine-0.7.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 14:55:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 10:55:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251455.n4PEtiJu024620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Matthew Truch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Matthew Truch 2009-05-25 10:55:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slimdata Short Description: Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data Owners: truch Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 15:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251511.n4PFBxSQ002652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #14 from Jess Portnoy 2009-05-25 11:11:57 EDT --- I cannot use %configure as CodeLite build is not done by GNU's auto tools. --copy-generic-name-to-name Copy the contents of the GenericName field to the Name field Its in the man page. About the strip, these files were not stripped unless I explictly ran this, causing rpmlint to complain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 15:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251511.n4PFBKbM002551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 15:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251514.n4PFEvEx028758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #41 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-25 11:14:53 EDT --- As far as I can see, we have three kind of files: 1.) Pure python scripts which will be used from blender. This files has to been installed into /usr/share/blender/scripts 2.) Nativ so files which are python extension used by the blender python scripts. This files are installed into the architecure-depending python-sitelib. 3.) Native so files which will called by applications or other so files. This files should be installed into %{_libdir} For my judgement the location of the installed files looks fine. Best Regards: Jochen Schmitt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 15:25:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:25:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251525.n4PFP9IX031506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 11:25:08 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK - Package obsoletes lxsession-lite <= 0.3.6-6 and provides it, thus replacing the old package. OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 16:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251605.n4PG56Z4015693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 16:04:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:04:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251604.n4PG4jHr015306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-25 12:04:43 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project home page + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Packaged sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 5c14449d2960ddba89efc48269ba6f3b) + Package contains valid license tag + License tags state GPLv2 with exception as a valid OSS license + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Proper buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned on the beginning of %clean and %install + Package has several subpackges + Devel subpackage has proper Requires to main package + Package has proper Provides/Obsoletes statement for the renaming processs + Package has a SMP enabled build + Build honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Local build works fine + There are no complaints from rpmlint about the source rpm + Debuginfo rpm contains source files + Scratch build on koji works fine + Files has proper files permissions + All package files are owned by the package + %files stanza contains no duplicates + No packaged file belongs to another package + %doc stanza is small, so we need no extran doc subpackage + Package has proper %changelog Bad: - Package doesn't contains verbatin copy of the license. There is a text file which refer to the GPLv2 and a additional files which described the exception to use the packaged software together with non-GPLed software, but there is none verbatin copy of the GPLv2 - Rpmlint has warning for the binary package $ rpmlint 389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dirsrv 389-ds-base.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv - Rpmlint has warning for the devel subpackage: $ rpmlint 389-ds-base-devel-1.2.1-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 389-ds-base-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib - Please use %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d instead of %{_inittddir} Your package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 16:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251617.n4PGH5Lk018547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 12:17:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > I cannot use %configure as CodeLite build is not done by GNU's auto tools. OK. Please enable SMP make though, if it works. > --copy-generic-name-to-name > Copy the contents of the GenericName field to the Name field > Its in the man page. There is no man page for desktop-file-utils. The only documentation is the --help switch, and it doesn't give that on F10. > About the strip, these files were not stripped unless I explictly ran this, > causing rpmlint to complain. Stripping yourself causes broken debuginfo packages. ** - You need at least BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils in order to build in mock (or koji). - You need to use make CMP="g++ %{optflags} -fPIC -DON_64_BIT" GCC="gcc %{optflags} -fPIC -DON_64_BIT" to make the build process use the optimization flags given by RPM. - SMP make doesn't seem to work. You should contact upstream about this; not using SMP make is *slow* for a program of this size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 16:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251631.n4PGVkmm015685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-25 12:31:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lxsession Short Description: Lightweight X11 session manager Owners: cwickert Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 17:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251721.n4PHLAg2001463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-25 13:21:08 EDT --- Well, as I cannot find where to download the needed Source I cannot try to rebuild this package. Then: - Please update your spec/srpm with addressing my comment on bug 472696 comment 3. - For GConf schemas scriptlets, please refer to: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#GConf ! Note that there are %pre, %post and %preun scriptlet. Also the corresponding Requires(pre) or so are needed. - We usually does _not_ regard GConf schemas files under %_sysconfdir/gconf/schemas as configuration files. ( rpmlint will complain if you remove %config(noreplace) from GConf schemas file, however please just ignore the warning) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 17:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251757.n4PHvhh0009955@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugs.michael at gmx.net --- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-25 13:57:41 EDT --- > About the strip, these files were not stripped unless I explictly > ran this, causing rpmlint to complain. Install the "redhat-rpm-config" package. [It will hopefully become a dependency of the "fedora-packager" package in the near future.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 18:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251820.n4PIKlpq015581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Ant Bryan 2009-05-25 14:20:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > rpmlint output: > mulk-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm > /usr/src/debug/mulk-0.4.1/src/uri_parser.c > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > - Fix this in setup phase. Thanks, I had not been using rpmlint on debuginfo packages. rpmlint mulk-0.4.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm mulk-debuginfo-0.4.1-2.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. OK > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK > MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. OK > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > OK > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. OK > MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK > MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. OK > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK > MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK > MUST: Clean section exists. OK > MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A > > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSWORK > - Add THANKS and TODO. Done! > MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A > MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A > MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files > ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A > MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A > MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A > MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK > MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK > SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK > SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK > > > Fix the above before import to CVS. The package has been > > APPROVED Thanks for your time and help, Jussi! I think the package upstream has been improved and your comments will make it easier for mulk to be packaged elsewhere too! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mulk Short Description: Multi-connection network downloader with Metalink support Owners: ant Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 19:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905251900.n4PJ0UNH025139@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 18:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 14:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] New: Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Summary: Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: byron at theclarkfamily.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/lazygal.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/lazygal-0.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lazygal is another static web gallery generator written in Python. This is my first fedora package, so I'm looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 20:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252021.n4PKLYhv009358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 16:21:33 EDT --- (Upstream) URL doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 20:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252022.n4PKMIcn002224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-25 16:22:17 EDT --- (Upstream) URL doesn't work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 20:47:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 16:47:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252047.n4PKlq3e006471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 --- Comment #2 from Byron Clark 2009-05-25 16:47:51 EDT --- Sorry, fixed that typo. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/lazygal.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/lazygal-0.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252106.n4PL6j7Q009592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:06:43 EDT --- sakura-2.3.3-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:07:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252107.n4PL7RlN009768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:07:26 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252108.n4PL8EJI009946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:08:13 EDT --- python-altgraph-0.6.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495372] Review Request: python-altgraph - Python graph (network) package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252108.n4PL8Ico009982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495372 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.7-2.fc9 |0.6.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252108.n4PL8sMU010068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:08:53 EDT --- globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:07:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:07:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252107.n4PL7VtM009805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |2.13-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252108.n4PL8xYC010106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252111.n4PLBFTv017697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:11:14 EDT --- safecopy-1.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252111.n4PLB0wm017641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:10:59 EDT --- ocaml-autoconf-1.0-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252112.n4PLCYQn018074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-4.fc10 |1.3-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252110.n4PLANTq017539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:10:21 EDT --- mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:09:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:09:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252109.n4PL97lK016880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:09:05 EDT --- perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-App-Nopaste'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5420 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252110.n4PLAmdO011150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:10:46 EDT --- gmixer-1.3-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252112.n4PLCTIf011681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:12:29 EDT --- gmixer-1.3-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495950] Review Request: safecopy - Safe copying of files and partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252111.n4PLBKX2011376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495950 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.2-2.fc9 |1.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:13:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252113.n4PLDUlv011877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:13:29 EDT --- lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252113.n4PLDn8v011930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:13:48 EDT --- cpptest-1.1.0-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252114.n4PLEWSJ012054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:14:31 EDT --- lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252111.n4PLB5E2011310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0-4.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:10:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252110.n4PLAqiV011185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.3-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252110.n4PLASQA011083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.14-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:13:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252113.n4PLDHDj011835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:12:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:12:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252112.n4PLCPSm011647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:12:24 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5415 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496166] Review Request: sakura - Terminal emulator based on GTK and VTE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGZ5Z019422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496166 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:16:34 EDT --- sakura-2.3.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496167] Review Request: lilyterm - Light and easy to use X Terminal Emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGk89019454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496167 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:16:45 EDT --- lilyterm-0.9.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252117.n4PLH4Vh019500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:17:02 EDT --- mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-5.fc11.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252114.n4PLEieT018740@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:14:43 EDT --- drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252115.n4PLFKL8019217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:15:19 EDT --- globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252113.n4PLDCp0018474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:13:11 EDT --- globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252115.n4PLFPr6019275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-2.fc11 |2.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488908] Review Request: cpptest - A portable and powerful and simple unit testing framework for C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252113.n4PLDs7Q018575@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488908 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.1.0-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGCCA019371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.26.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252117.n4PLH9Hu019543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |8.5.7-5.fc11.1 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:14:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:14:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252114.n4PLEGir018671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:14:15 EDT --- perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-App-Nopaste'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5421 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:18:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:18:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252118.n4PLIveR013752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:18:53 EDT --- lmms-0.4.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501130] Review Request: drbdlinks - A program for managing links into a DRBD shared partition In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252119.n4PLJZiV013882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501130 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:19:34 EDT --- drbdlinks-1.18-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252119.n4PLJGdN013793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.13-1.fc10 |2.13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:18:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:18:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252118.n4PLIPrc013664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.13.0-5.fc10 |0.13.0-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499983] Review Request: mingw32-libsoup - MinGW library for HTTP and XML-RPC functionality In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLG8wX013058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499983 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:16:07 EDT --- mingw32-libsoup-2.26.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252117.n4PLHpv0013483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:17:50 EDT --- python-upoints-0.11.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGqnE013233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:16:51 EDT --- mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGJV8013115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:16:18 EDT --- mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGvD3013298@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.24-7.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGOIu013151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252116.n4PLGUXn013188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:16:29 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5396 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490872] Review Request: jnettop - Network traffic tracker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252118.n4PLIL9l020057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490872 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:18:20 EDT --- jnettop-0.13.0-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 443771] Review Request: lmms - Linux MultiMedia Studio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252119.n4PLJ1Jc020138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443771 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252122.n4PLMHJ2021413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:22:15 EDT --- smem-0.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500191] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Twofish - Twofish Encryption Algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252119.n4PLJBKF020176@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500191 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:19:10 EDT --- perl-Crypt-Twofish-2.13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252119.n4PLJgdC020248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:19:41 EDT --- mingw32-tcl-8.5.7-5.fc10.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252121.n4PLLfsF021271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:21:40 EDT --- globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252121.n4PLLIKN021190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252121.n4PLLjCr021305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-1.fc11 |2.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495418] Review Request: python-upoints - Python modules for working with points on Earth In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252117.n4PLHtC7019966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495418 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.11.0-2.fc9 |0.11.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252120.n4PLKV4Z021038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:20:30 EDT --- mingw32-zfstream-20041202-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252118.n4PLI2Ru019999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:18:01 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5373 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252122.n4PLM5jc015264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:22:04 EDT --- ocaml-autoconf-1.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252120.n4PLKgcJ014784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:20:41 EDT --- razertool-0.0.7-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252121.n4PLLEpk015084@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:21:12 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNHMQ015500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.3-4.fc9 |1.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481159] Review Request: ocaml-autoconf - Autoconf macros for OCaml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252122.n4PLM9Ep015295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481159 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-4.fc10 |1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:19:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:19:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501924] Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Tool Command Language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252119.n4PLJlOk014113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501924 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|8.5.7-5.fc11.1 |8.5.7-5.fc10.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNs9E015654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-2.fc10 |2.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252120.n4PLKlAG014847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.0.7-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:24:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252124.n4PLOIrE015736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.24-7.fc10 |1.1.24-7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNXwP015556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.14-2.fc10 |1.14-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:20:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491616] Review Request: mingw32-zfstream - MinGW Windows C++ abstraction library for compressed and non-compressed file I/O In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252120.n4PLKadU014755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491616 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20041202-5.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:22:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:22:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252122.n4PLM0dW015233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:22:00 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252121.n4PLLuCg015199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:21:55 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Catalyst-View-Email'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5470 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497639] Review Request: gmixer - Just a simple audio mixer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNCm5021889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497639 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:23:11 EDT --- gmixer-1.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498490] Review Request: smem - Reports application memory usage in a meaningful way In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252125.n4PLP02F022492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498490 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:24:59 EDT --- smem-0.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478918] Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNnBC022068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:23:49 EDT --- globus-gssapi-error-2.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499991] Review Request: mingw32-libxslt - MinGW Windows Library providing the Gnome XSLT engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252124.n4PLODA5022213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499991 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:24:13 EDT --- mingw32-libxslt-1.1.24-7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499986] Review Request: mingw32-libidn - MinGW Windows Internationalized Domain Name support library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNTdF021954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499986 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:23:28 EDT --- mingw32-libidn-1.14-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:25:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:25:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252125.n4PLP6JX022828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:25:05 EDT --- mingw32-libssh2-1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNdoU021992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:23:38 EDT --- globus-proxy-utils-2.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499979] Review Request: mingw32-libssh2 - MinGW Windows library implementation of the SSH2 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252125.n4PLPBgO022868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc10 |1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453865] Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252123.n4PLNhhu022026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-1.fc9 |2.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 21:24:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:24:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252124.n4PLOPGa022252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-25 17:24:24 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nfoview'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5430 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 22:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252227.n4PMRuHV032164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-25 18:27:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-mongrel_cluster.spec SRPM URL: \ http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 22:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252236.n4PMaK2T027142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #32 from Paul F. Kunz 2009-05-25 18:36:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > The F11 build failure is a different issue (a GCC 4.4 issue in the Zorba source > code, nothing to do with CMake). I don't understand it. The compiler is says FunctionSig has no type, but it is declared as a class in the same file (xquery_parser.y) on line 63. Also, the code compiles with gcc 4.4 installed in /usr/local on my Fedora 10 machine. Any suggestions on what to do next? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 22:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252241.n4PMflYv002071@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #21 from Brennan Ashton 2009-05-25 18:41:44 EDT --- I have some concerns about if this is passing its buildtime tests: t/00_pod.t ......... ok t/01_manifest.t .... ok t/02_help.t ........ ok t/03_spaces.t ...... ok t/10_template.t .... ok t/20_parser.t ...... ok t/30_netlist.t ..... ok t/32_example.t ..... ok t/34_notfound.t .... ok t/40_coverage.t .... ok t/42_itemkey.t ..... ok t/44_makecheck.t ... ok t/60_spp_pre.t ..... 1/6 Integer overflow in hexadecimal number at /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/SystemPerl-1.320/blib/lib/SystemC/Netlist/CoverPoint.pm line 473. Integer overflow in hexadecimal number at /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/SystemPerl-1.320/blib/lib/SystemC/Netlist/CoverPoint.pm line 473. t/60_spp_pre.t ..... ok t/62_spp_inline.t .. 1/2 Integer overflow in hexadecimal number at /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/SystemPerl-1.320/blib/lib/SystemC/Netlist/CoverPoint.pm line 473. Integer overflow in hexadecimal number at /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/BUILD/SystemPerl-1.320/blib/lib/SystemC/Netlist/CoverPoint.pm line 473. t/62_spp_inline.t .. ok t/70_trace.t ....... ok t/80_gcc.t ......... ok t/85_scl.t ......... ok t/90_ncsc_run.t .... ok All tests successful. This is on a F11 machine with this per-Verlog http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=103021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 22:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] New: Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows regular expression library Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376442 Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 23:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252304.n4PN4Uqu031463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #22 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-05-25 19:04:29 EDT --- The warnings are due to a test that seems to not be 32-bit compatible. I'll fix it - but its only the test that needs to change, and since the tests don't get installed it should be fine to use this version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 23:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502537] New: Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502537 Summary: Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wilmer at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/vrrpd/vrrpd.spec SRPM URL: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/vrrpd/vrrpd-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: VRRPd is an implementation of Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol as specified in rfc2338. VRRPd is interoperable with other RFC-based VRRP implementations, including Cisco and Juniper, and is included as a standard feature on ImageStream routers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 23:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502537] Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252346.n4PNkabw005518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502537 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-25 19:46:35 EDT --- please fix 1 - BuildRoot -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot 2- BuildRequires -> every fedora linux have kernel installed by default, doesn't need kernel in build requires, you need only kernel-devel. 3- install section please simplify things using install -Dp -m so you reduce the size of your spec file. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon May 25 23:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 19:49:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502537] Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905252349.n4PNnQJv011940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502537 --- Comment #2 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-25 19:49:25 EDT --- after you fix these things, please post here the new spec file and a koji scratch build, this will speed up the review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 00:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 20:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260015.n4Q0FbdB016191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #8 from King InuYasha 2009-05-25 20:15:35 EDT --- Ok, I talked to upstream of Enano about the included parts, and he has told me that the components in Enano are significantly modified from the original sources. Specifically in the case of Text_Wiki, there is a huge boatload of patches and modifications to make it work properly in Enano. Additionally, Text_Wiki has not seen a release since 2007, and upstream (Enano) is planning on replacing it (Text_Wiki) in the near future. For now, Enano 1.1.6 final has been released, so a new spec file and SRPM are made available: Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/enano.spec SRPM URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/enano-1.1.6-5.fc10.src.rpm This one should basically fix up all the rpmlint complaints. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 01:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 21:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502537] Review Request: vrrpd - Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (Daemon only) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260107.n4Q174ll016870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502537 --- Comment #3 from Wilmer Jaramillo M. 2009-05-25 21:07:03 EDT --- Excelent recomendations Itamar, new uploads: Spec URL: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/vrrpd/vrrpd.spec SRPM URL: http://wilmer.fedorapeople.org/files/review/vrrpd/vrrpd-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376564 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 02:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497614] Review Request: icoutils - Utility for extracting and converting Microsoft icon and cursor files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260214.n4Q2E5Qw027102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497614 --- Comment #2 from Eric Moret 2009-05-25 22:14:04 EDT --- Fixed in spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 02:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 22:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260240.n4Q2ewV7006816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #25 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-25 22:40:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > The root configure file lists these globus libraries: > > globuslibs="libglobus_gss_assist_$flavour libglobus_gssapi_gsi_$flavour > libglobus_gsi_credential_$flavour libglobus_common_$flavour > libglobus_gsi_callback_$flavour libglobus_proxy_ssl_$flavour > libglobus_gsi_sysconfig_$flavour libglobus_openssl_error_$flavour > libglobus_gssapi_gsi_$flavour libglobus_gsi_callback_$flavour > libglobus_oldgaa_$flavour libglobus_gsi_cert_utils_$flavour > libglobus_openssl_$flavour libglobus_gsi_proxy_core_$flavour > libglobus_callout_$flavour libltdl_$flavour > libssl_$flavour libcrypto_$flavour" > > libglobus_gss_assist > bug #467239 > libglobus_gssapi_gsi > bug #467237 > libglobus_gsi_credential > bug #453861 > libglobus_common > bug #453851 > libglobus_gsi_callback, libglobus_oldgaa > bug #453858 > libglobus_proxy_ssl > bug #453854 > libglobus_gsi_sysconfig > bug #453857 > libglobus_openssl_error > bug #453853 > libglobus_gsi_cert_utils > bug #453856 > libglobus_openssl > bug #453855 > libglobus_gsi_proxy_core > bug #453862 > libglobus_callout > bug #467235 > libltdl > bug #453849 (GPT wrapper for the system version) > libssl, libcrypto > bug #453850 (GPT wrapper for the system version) > > The configure script also looks for the grid-proxy-init binary - this is > available in > bug #453865 All done!!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 05:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 01:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457160] Review Request: Zorba - General purpose XQuery processor implemented in C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260524.n4Q5O5ER009774@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457160 --- Comment #33 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-26 01:24:03 EDT --- Maybe a different version of Bison or of some library? The line before declares "expr", maybe that's defined as a macro somewhere? If you change your: make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags} in your specfile to: make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags} || ( cd src && g++ -E -Dzorba_simplestore_EXPORTS -Dzorba_EXPORTS -DFLEX_FILES_REGENERATED -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I. -I../external -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I../include compiler/parser/query_loc.cpp && exit 1 ) you should get the preprocessed source code in your build.log, that might tell us some more about the error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 06:39:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:39:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] New: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library Alias: mingw32-boost https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-tcl - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-mingw at lists.fedoraproject.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows Boost C++ library. Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 06:42:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:42:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498873] Review Request: thrift - A multi-language RPC and serialization framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260642.n4Q6gSvq022964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498873 --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-26 02:42:26 EDT --- Fixed release/version, tweaked requires and updated to latest snapshot. SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/thrift-0.2-0.20090525svn777690.fc10.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn269&r=269&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/thrift/thrift.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 06:53:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260653.n4Q6rGvx025315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 06:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 02:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260656.n4Q6uajL032714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #12 from Parag 2009-05-26 02:56:32 EDT --- If no response received in next 15 days, I will close this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502556] New: Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502556 Summary: Review Request: lamson - A Python SMTP server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/lamson/lamson.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/lamson-0.8.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lamson is a modern Pythonic mail server built like a web application server. rpmlint [silas at silas rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260709.n4Q79hpr029561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 03:09:42 EDT --- Fedora review http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-26 Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376692 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint mingw*.rpm mingw32-libgnurx.spec mingw32-libgnurx-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libregex.a mingw32-libgnurx-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to stick to the native version + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2.1 ! License matches the actual package license Its not BSD + The package contains the license file (COPYING.LIB) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 35c8fed3101ca1f253e9b6b1966661f6 mingw-libgnurx-2.5.1-src.tar.gz 35c8fed3101ca1f253e9b6b1966661f6 x/mingw-libgnurx-2.5.1-src.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static n/a Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260739.n4Q7daSX003966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #7 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-26 03:39:34 EDT --- Fedora 7 was end-of-life a while ago, only Fedora 9 and up are currently active and Fedora 9 will be end-of-life soon. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life Fedora 10 also uses Python 2.5, but Fedora didn't support creating eggs in distutils until Fedora 9. I would highly recommend using a non-EOL product when doing package reviews or use mock and a more recent build tree. I changed my setup.py to use setuptools instead of distutils which should fix the issue you were seeing. SRPM: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/funcshell-0.0.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn274&r=274&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/funcshell/funcshell.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260752.n4Q7qPqS012533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:52:23 EDT --- xcowsay-1.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492927] Review Request: xcowsay - xcowsay displays a cute cow and message In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260752.n4Q7qUSN012576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492927 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-1.fc10 |1.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260752.n4Q7q4KJ012445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:52:03 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260752.n4Q7qESe012488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260753.n4Q7rt8f006900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:53:54 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494693] Review Request: gloox - A rock-solid, full-featured Jabber/XMPP client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260751.n4Q7pf6E006427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494693 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:51:39 EDT --- gloox-1.0-0.5.SVNr4003.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:53:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:53:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260753.n4Q7r2nQ006697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:53:00 EDT --- R-Biostrings-2.12.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260751.n4Q7pwnZ006503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:51:57 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260753.n4Q7r7SW006734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.12.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260752.n4Q7q9nr006556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260755.n4Q7tLhv013608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:55:19 EDT --- R-Biostrings-2.12.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:56:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:56:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260756.n4Q7ugxx013925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11 |0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260754.n4Q7s0MF013016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490721] Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260755.n4Q7tPtR007715@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.12.1-2.fc10 |2.12.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260756.n4Q7umm4008197@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.6.4.1-1.fc11 |0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:56:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:56:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498363] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe - Add to Any Subscribe Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260756.n4Q7ubH8008151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498363 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:56:36 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 07:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498362] Review Request: wordpress-plugin-add-to-any - Add to Any: Share/Bookmark/Email Button plugin for WordPress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260756.n4Q7uTgE008096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498362 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 03:56:28 EDT --- wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-subscribe-0.9.6.4.1-1.fc10, wordpress-plugin-add-to-any-0.9.9.2.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 08:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 04:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260826.n4Q8Quv3014861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: mingw32-tcl |Review Request: |- MinGW Windows Boost C++ |mingw32-boost - MinGW |library |Windows Boost C++ library --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-26 04:26:55 EDT --- Fixed Summary line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 08:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 04:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260857.n4Q8vHn8021217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 04:57:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx.spec SRPM URL: http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm * Tue May 26 2009 Erik van Pienbroek - 2.5.1-2 - Fixed license tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260905.n4Q95o3l029123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 05:05:48 EDT --- The static subpackage contains some leftovers from libsoup: %description static Static version of the MinGW Windows Libsoup library. The %defattr line should be: %defattr(-,root,root,-) What's the dependency problem with the test framework library? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260917.n4Q9He9i026250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 05:17:39 EDT --- APPROVED by sailer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260918.n4Q9I0Ub026318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260922.n4Q9MPLm000946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 05:22:24 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libgnurx Short Description: MinGW Regex library Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 09:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 05:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905260953.n4Q9rs7L002959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 05:53:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Fixed Summary line. Thanks! (In reply to comment #2) > What's the dependency problem with the test framework library? All of: libboost_prg_exec_monitor.lib libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mt.lib libboost_test_exec_monitor.lib libboost_test_exec_monitor-mt.lib libboost_unit_test_framework.lib libboost_unit_test_framework-mt.lib link to external, undefined functions. While under unix, this is possible, under windows, DLL's do not allow undefined external references. Therefore, we can only provide static libraries for these. Specifically, test_exec_monitor wants test_main(int, char**), prg_exec_monitor wants cpp_main(int, char**), and unit_test_framework wants init_unit_test_suite(int, char**). > The static subpackage contains some leftovers from libsoup: > %description static > Static version of the MinGW Windows Libsoup library. > > The %defattr line should be: > %defattr(-,root,root,-) An update for these is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 10:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 06:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261013.n4QADs7H008723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |t.sailer at alumni.ethz.ch Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 06:13:51 EDT --- Fedora review http://www.ftd4linux.nl/contrib/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-26 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint * mingw32-hunspell.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libparsers.a mingw32-hunspell-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libhunspell-1.2.a mingw32-hunspell-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. As per Packaging/MinGW, these errors can be ignored. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint output + Package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + Specfile name matches the package base name + Package follows the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines version seems to be slightly ahead of native (1.1 vs. 1.0) please try to stick to the native version + License meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora LGPLv2+ or GPLv2+ or MPLv1.1 + License matches the actual package license + The package contains the license file (COPYING,COPYING.LGPL,COPYING.MPL) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible - IMO, you don't need to include the whole history of the native package in %changelog, just a reference that it was derived from the native package would be sufficient + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm 1177af54a09e320d2c24015f29c3a93e hunspell-1.2.8.tar.gz 1177af54a09e320d2c24015f29c3a93e x/hunspell-1.2.8.tar.gz n/a Package builds in mock n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires list all build dependencies n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/* n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and %postun + Does not use Prefix: /usr + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + %files has %defattr + %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Consistent use of macros + Package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Fedora MinGW guidelines allow headers in main package + Static libraries should be in -static + Packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig' n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files Fedora MinGW guidelines allow .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages + %install begins with rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT + Filenames must be valid UTF-8 Have you tried to upstream your patches? Especially hunspell-build-dll.patch seems like very upstream-worthy. Also, what is the failure mode of AC_FUNC_MALLOC? I guess a bug report with autoconf would be in order. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 10:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 06:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261036.n4QAa6ta014130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #2 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 06:36:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Have you tried to upstream your patches? > Especially hunspell-build-dll.patch seems like very upstream-worthy. Filed at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2796772&group_id=143754&atid=756395 > Also, what is the failure mode of AC_FUNC_MALLOC? I guess a bug report with > autoconf would be in order. The AC_FUNC_MALLOC is some kind of fallback for environments which don't have a malloc() function in their libc. If this is the case (apparently it is for MinGW), then a '#define malloc rpl_malloc' is added to config.h. According to rjones, the rpl_malloc() function is part of gnulib. We don't have gnulib in our MinGW toolchain, so this ends up in a undefined reference (to rpl_malloc). After removing the AC_FUNC_MALLOC from the configure.ac file, the compile completes without problems (and the malloc from the MinGW libraries is used). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 10:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 06:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261046.n4QAkMD5022332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 06:46:21 EDT --- The promised update: Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 10:56:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 06:56:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261056.n4QAuFbH024869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 06:56:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > The AC_FUNC_MALLOC is some kind of fallback for environments which don't have a > malloc() function in their libc. If this is the case (apparently it is for > MinGW), then a '#define malloc rpl_malloc' is added to config.h. I agree we don't want rpl_malloc. The question is why does it fail to find the malloc in libmsvcrt.a (or newer friends). libmsvcrt.a provides _malloc: i686-pc-mingw32-nm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libmsvcrt.a dxnmbs00676.o: 00000000 b .bss 00000000 d .data 00000000 i .idata$4 00000000 i .idata$5 00000000 i .idata$6 00000000 i .idata$7 00000000 t .text U __head_libmsvcrt_a 00000000 I __imp__malloc 00000000 T _malloc But that shouldn't hold up packaging. APPROVED by sailer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261106.n4QB6J5K027516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #34 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-26 07:06:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dinotrace Short Description: X11 waveform viewer for electronics Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:12:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:12:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261112.n4QBCZ3M028918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-26 07:12:33 EDT --- Brennan, can you continue with the review ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] New: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 Summary: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/btnx.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/btnx-0.4.11-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: btnx is a daemon that enables rerouting of mouse button events through uinput as keyboard and other mouse button combinations. For example, you can configure an extra mouse button to send a Ctrl+Alt+Right command to switch workspaces. This is especially useful for mice with more buttons than Gnome or KDE can properly handle, or mice that need evdev and a 100 step howto to register button events at all. btnx integrates revoco, a program that allows changing MX Revolution's wheel behavior. So, rpmlint is clean, and Koji scratch builds are here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376801 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376787 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261126.n4QBQHlI032439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |502592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502592] Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261126.n4QBQGnT032414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261126.n4QBQHDp026899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 07:26:16 EDT --- Thomas, thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-hunspell Short Description: MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library Owners: epienbro rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:24:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:24:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261124.n4QBOk58026214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #4 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 07:24:45 EDT --- On the fedora-mingw mailing list Fridrich Strba clarified the AC_FUNC_MALLOC behaviour: Easy! The AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC try to execute a program to see whether malloc(0) will return a NULL pointer. If that is not the case, it will use the rpl_malloc. Since cross-compiling, binaries cannot be executed and the test fails even though the malloc and realloc are in MS C runtime. Those malloc and realloc functions are compliant in the sense of AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC test, so patching them out is safe when cross-compiling for win32. Cheers Fridrich -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502592] New: Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Summary: Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/btnx-config.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/btnx-config-0.4.9-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: btnx-config is a graphical user interface for btnx So, rpmlint is clean, and Koji scratch builds are here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376808 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261140.n4QBeCsD003448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #23 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-26 07:40:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > (In reply to comment #18) > > > > Using %cmake instead of "cmake ..." will likely resolve your issue. > > I tried this, and rpmlint still generates a warning. Does it ? can you post your SRPM please. My scratch build for F-10 gives me only these warnings: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1376830/ chitlesh(~)[0]$ls *.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.i386.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.i386.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc64.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc64.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc64.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.ppc.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo-debuginfo-0.6.11-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm armadillo-0.6.11-2.fc11.src.rpm armadillo-devel-0.6.11-2.fc10.i386.rpm chitlesh(~)[0]$rpmlint *.rpm armadillo.i386: W: no-documentation armadillo.ppc64: W: no-documentation armadillo.ppc: W: no-documentation armadillo.x86_64: W: no-documentation armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo-0.6.11.tar.gz 0640 armadillo.src: W: strange-permission armadillo.spec 0640 13 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 11:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 07:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502596] New: Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502596 Summary: Review Request: sblim-tools-libra - SBLIM Common Resource Access Library for WBEM-SMT tasks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-tools-libra/sblim-tools-libra.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-tools-libra/sblim-tools-libra-0.2.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The tools-libra package provides common functionality required by the task-specific resource access layers of wbem-smt tasks such as cmpi-dns and cmpi-samba. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 12:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 08:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261209.n4QC9Y6q010834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-26 08:09:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > The AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC try to execute a program to see > whether malloc(0) will return a NULL pointer. If that is not the case, So that means these autoconf tests can't be used when crosscompiling to any target, not just mingw. Bad. That should IMO at least be documented (it isn't in autoconf 2.63). > C runtime. Those malloc and realloc functions are compliant in the sense > of AC_FUNC_MALLOC and AC_FUNC_REALLOC test, so patching them out is safe > when cross-compiling for win32. That's not what I'm worried about. I'm worried about the tediousness to patch these tests out in all packages that use them, vs. fixing the macro in autoconf. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 12:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 08:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261215.n4QCF6bK012695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-26 08:15:04 EDT --- rpmlint is silent on this package. Koji scratch-build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1376891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 12:13:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 08:13:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] New: Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Summary: Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rjones at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ancient.spec SRPM URL: http://www.annexia.org/tmp/ocaml/ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Ancient is an OCaml module that allows you to use in-memory data structures which are larger than available memory and so are kept in swap. If you try this in normal OCaml code, you'll find that the machine quickly descends into thrashing as the garbage collector repeatedly iterates over swapped memory structures. This module lets you break that limitation. Of course the module doesn't work by magic. If your program tries to access these large structures, they still need to be swapped back in, but it is suitable for large, sparsely accessed structures. Secondly, this module allows you to share those structures between processes. In this mode, the structures are backed by a disk file, and any process that has read/write access to that disk file can map that file in and see the structures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 12:42:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 08:42:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261242.n4QCg1D8020049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #26 from Charles Lopes 2009-05-26 08:41:57 EDT --- Sorry for the late feedback. The current version of the gnustep-make package does not make any difference between the Local and System domains anymore. In order to restore the upstream behaviour, I made my own version gnustep-make-2.0.8-2.fc10 where I commented out the following line in the spec file: sed -i -e 's,/local,,' FilesystemLayouts/fhs-system As for gnustep-base, I successfully built the package with mock for fedora-10-x86_64 and fedora-10-i386. I did so with both the original gnustep-make-2.0.8-2.fc10 and the version modified as described earlier. So I would say that the last package is fine by me. I have used it to build sogo and did not see any issues in my tests so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 13:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502609] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502609 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-syslog - SBLIM syslog instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-syslog/sblim-cmpi-syslog.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-syslog/sblim-cmpi-syslog-0.7.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Syslog Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 13:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] New: Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Summary: Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: th.p.janssen at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://thomasj.fedorapeople.org/stfl-0.20-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: STFL is a library which implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals. It is needed for another (the main app i want to package for fedora) package called Newsbeuter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 14:10:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:10:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] New: Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Summary: Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/libint.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/libint-1.1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Libint library is used to evaluate the traditional (electron repulsion) and certain novel two-body matrix elements (integrals) over Cartesian Gaussian functions used in modern atomic and molecular theory. The idea of the library is to let computer write optimized code for computing such integrals. There are two primary advantages to this: much less human effort is required to write code for computing new integrals, and code can be optimized specifically for a particular computer architecture (e.g., vector processor). Libint has been utilized to implement methods such as Hartree-Fock (HF) and Kohn-Sham density functional theory (KS DFT), second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), coupled cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) method, as well as explicitly correlated R12 methods. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 14:30:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:30:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: xavier at bachelot.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Config-Properties.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Config-Properties-1.70-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Config::Properties is a near implementation of the java.util.Properties API. It is designed to allow easy reading, writing and manipulation of Java- style property files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 14:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261447.n4QEl2Kw020494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Fridrich Strba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fridrich.strba at bluewin.ch --- Comment #7 from Fridrich Strba 2009-05-26 10:47:01 EDT --- OK, I don't see how you want to change that. You need to run a programme to be sure that malloc(0) returns NULL or non-null. You have some other situations where you cannot determine something without actually running a programme, like allignments of types. The standard way of proceding is either to patch the system for known platform with values that we know to be true (I did this here http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/evolution-data-server/trunk/configure.in?r1=9959&r2=9961 ) or to pre-populate the compile cache with values for tests that cannot be run. In this case, it is just to pre-fill the cache with: ac_cv_func_malloc_0_nonnull=yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 14:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 10:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261451.n4QEpi8s021644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-26 10:51:42 EDT --- New Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts.spec New SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 15:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261523.n4QFNVft024957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-26 11:23:29 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.src.rpm Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 bc0c5ccc95bf0fcbc68b372c5f00d2d5 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 8acbdc11fc93f8b304b3ddb804506415e963c6c3 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 - Added LICENSE.GPLv2 which contains the full text of the GPLv2 - changed %{_inittddir} to %{_sysconfdir}/rc.d/init.d -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 15:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261524.n4QFOuKF030608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 --- Comment #8 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-26 11:24:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-ds-base Short Description: 389 Directory Server base package Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 15:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261525.n4QFPnJ5025985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #27 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-26 11:25:47 EDT --- Thats sounds fine. Please talk to the maintainer of gnustep-make about the topic you have described in your comment. At least it may be fine to have a formal review and approvement of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 15:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 11:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261547.n4QFlikE006334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #9 from David Nalley 2009-05-26 11:47:41 EDT --- So I talked to a FPC member and the gist of the conversation is: These libraries have to go. In order of preference: 1) Upstream the patches, eg have upstream (enano) commit their changes to the library project in question. 2) Fork from upstream. eg, have enano essentially fork the packages and begin maintaining a fork of each of those libraries (which will then need to be packaged) 3) Other solution.... I don't know what other solution exists to be honest, though I imagine that there exists some novel solution. Unfortunately a lot of this seems very much out of your hands and in the hands of upstream. Let me know how I can help you proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 16:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501831] Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261603.n4QG300N011855@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-26 12:02:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-testosterone Short Description: Text-based UI for running Python unit tests Owners: dmalcolm Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 17:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261712.n4QHCNP2032182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-26 13:12:22 EDT --- A fair amount of the repoze stack has failing tests, even though we know the code works fine, which is why it is commented out. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-repoze-who-friendlyform Short Description: Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 17:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261734.n4QHYBtH030651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-26 13:34:10 EDT --- Good deal, still waiting on libglpng to show up in my mock buildroot. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 17:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261743.n4QHhk9V001058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 13:43:46 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 17:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261743.n4QHhZu2009534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 13:43:32 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 17:43:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:43:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261743.n4QHhfsw009602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 13:43:40 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 17:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261743.n4QHhd8Q009566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #8 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-26 13:43:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Good deal, still waiting on libglpng to show up in my mock buildroot. . . Hmm, are you pointing mock at rawhide + F-11 updates ? rawhide == F-11 GA, so get the latest and greatest you need rawhide + F-11 updates. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261839.n4QId2N4016792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #5 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-05-26 14:39:01 EDT --- While trying to build this package using rpmbuild I noticed several occurences of lines like this: gcc.archive bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/libboost_math_c99f.lib "/usr/bin/ar" rc "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/libboost_math_c99f.lib" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/acoshf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/asinhf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/atanhf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/cbrtf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/copysignf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/erfcf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/erff.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/expm1f.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/fmaxf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/fminf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/fpclassifyf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/hypotf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/lgammaf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/llroundf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/log1pf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/lroundf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/nextafterf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/nexttowardf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/roundf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/tgammaf.o" "bin.v2/libs/math/build/gcc-mingw-4.4.0/release/debug-symbols-on/link-static/target-os-windows/truncf.o" It looks like the native 'ar' is used (/usr/bin/ar) instead of i686-pc-mingw32-ar. This might need some further investigation. Another issue I noticed in the .spec file is this: if a2dll libboost_thread-mt.lib libboost_thread-mt "-lpthreadGC2"; then As of mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-8{.fc11,.fc12} it isn't necessary to use '-lpthreadGC2' anymore. It should be sufficient to use just '-lpthread' here. For the link errors in the testsuite libraries. I might have found out a way to get it operational as shared libraries. Would it be possible to add a main() function to those testsuite libraries which looks something like this: int main(int argc, char **argv) { void (*test_main_func) (int, char**); test_main_func = GetProcAddress(NULL, "test_main"); if (!test_main_func) { printf("No test_main() function found\n"); return -1; } test_main_func(arg1, arg2); return 0; } -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:46:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:46:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261846.n4QIkcrd027939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 14:46:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345498) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345498) laconic shadow fontconfig rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:50:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:50:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261850.n4QIojn8020156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 14:50:44 EDT --- ??? APPROVED ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 18:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261849.n4QInu37019692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-26 14:49:55 EDT --- Behdad suggests the rules in the attached file for laconic shadow. (20:31:14) behdad: nim-nim: yes. in target="scan" (20:31:16) behdad: I suggest: (20:31:34) behdad: 1) in target="scan" append "LaconicShadow" as family name (not replace). (20:31:56) behdad: humm. then add LaconicShadow to decorative queue ? (20:42:43) behdad: nim-nim: I believe so. I never used target="scan" myself though... (20:42:43) behdad: so test The rest of the packaging is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 19:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261906.n4QJ63Ld025008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #6 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-05-26 15:06:02 EDT --- Is there any practical difference between native 'ar' and i686-pc-mingw32-ar? I thought it was just a generic archive tool ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 19:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261912.n4QJCFQn003406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2009-05-26 15:12:14 EDT --- Looks good to me. There's some trailing whitespace in the spec file (Version and Source0 lines), but not a showstopper. Changelog is missing release. rpmlint output: % rpmlint *.rpm virtuoso-opensource.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1) virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.11 ['5.0.11-1.fc11', '5.0.11-1'] virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbc.so virtodbc.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbc.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbcu.so virtodbcu.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbcu.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbc_r.so virtodbc_r.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbc_r.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib64/virtodbcu_r.so virtodbcu_r.so virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/virtodbcu_r.so exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 virtuoso-opensource.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /var/lib/virtuoso/db/virtuoso.ini ../../..//etc/virtuoso/virtuoso.ini virtuoso-opensource-apps.x86_64: W: no-documentation virtuoso-opensource-conductor.noarch: W: no-documentation virtuoso-opensource-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11/libsrc/Wi/xmllazy.c virtuoso-opensource-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11/libsrc/Wi/sparqld.c virtuoso-opensource-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 12 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 19:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 15:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905261930.n4QJUN1H000384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-26 15:30:22 EDT --- [build at fawkes ~]$ cat /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-i586.cfg config_opts['root'] = 'fedora-rawhide-i586' config_opts['target_arch'] = 'i586' config_opts['chroot_setup_cmd'] = 'groupinstall buildsys-build' config_opts['dist'] = 'fc12' # only useful for --resultdir variable subst config_opts['yum.conf'] = """ [main] cachedir=/var/cache/yum debuglevel=1 reposdir=/dev/null logfile=/var/log/yum.log retries=20 obsoletes=1 gpgcheck=0 assumeyes=1 # repos [fedora] name=fedora mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=rawhide&arch=i586 failovermethod=priority [local] name=local baseurl=http://koji.fedoraproject.org/static-repos/dist-rawhide-current/i386 cost=2000 enabled=0 """ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 20:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262049.n4QKn4Im021219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #4 from Kevin Kofler 2009-05-26 16:49:03 EDT --- We also need libiodbc from http://www.iodbc.org/ packaged, it's used by Soprano to communicate with Virtuoso. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 20:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262054.n4QKs43r030107@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-26 16:54:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.04.5-1 - Update to 0.04.5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262202.n4QM2m4Z003923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:02:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262206.n4QM6cDX012021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:06:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262205.n4QM5FDj011864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:05:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262207.n4QM7UlK004809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:07:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:08:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:08:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262208.n4QM8Ew6004888@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:08:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:08:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:08:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262208.n4QM8wBR012316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:08:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:10:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262210.n4QMAbv6005552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:10:36 EDT --- CVS done, with the caveat that I did not add an InitialCC because we can only CC FAS accounts (or group accounts), not addresses. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502323] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262212.n4QMCV3X005800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:12:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:13:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:13:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262213.n4QMDP6D005903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ Bug 478919 depends on bug 478918, which changed state. Bug 478918 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-error - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Error Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478918 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:13:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:20:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:20:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466737] Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262220.n4QMKfpb014681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #28 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-26 18:20:39 EDT --- Thx for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262220.n4QMKisn014779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 466737, which changed state. Bug 466737 Summary: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262220.n4QMKhp2014745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Bug 472639 depends on bug 466737, which changed state. Bug 466737 Summary: Review Request: matio - Library for reading/writing Matlab MAT files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466737 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262227.n4QMR2JC015969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:27:00 EDT --- CVS requests are processed by a human and are not seen at all unless you set the fedora-cvs flag as Mamoru did for you. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262227.n4QMRnFK008370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:27:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:31:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:31:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262231.n4QMVMSq016925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:31:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:30:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:30:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262230.n4QMUMJO008973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:30:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262237.n4QMbSR9017971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:37:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262235.n4QMZmnR017803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:35:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262233.n4QMXHbO017164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #21 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:33:14 EDT --- There seems to be no FAS account "truch". Please correct the CVS request and re-set the fedora-cvs flag to '?' when you're ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262236.n4QMaa1f017903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:36:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:38:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262238.n4QMcYDI010187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #35 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:38:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:41:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:41:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262241.n4QMfta2019061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 18:41:54 EDT --- mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:42:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:42:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262242.n4QMgFjv019124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 18:42:14 EDT --- mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262239.n4QMdnXZ018439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:39:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501831] Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262240.n4QMeqLm010776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:40:51 EDT --- CVS done (no release branches were requested, so there's only a devel branch). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262244.n4QMiaKB011286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.0-1 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-26 18:44:35 EDT --- Package: mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Package: mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete 2389 (mod_log_post): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. 2390 (mod_log_post): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 22:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262248.n4QMmxKB020305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-26 18:48:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] New: Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 Summary: Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/wsdlpull/123/wsdlpull.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/wsdlpull/123/wsdlpull-1.23-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: wsdlpull is a C++ web services client library. It includes a WSDL Parser, a XSD Schema Parser and Validator and XML Parser and serializer and an API and command line tool for dynamic WSDL inspection and invocation. wsdlpull comes with a generic web service client. Using wsdlpull's /wsdl/ tool you can invoke most web services from command line without writing any code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:03:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:03:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262303.n4QN3kqs022614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:04:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:04:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262304.n4QN4m3O022683@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501831] Review Request: python-testosterone - Text-based UI for running Python unit tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262317.n4QNHLac016555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501831 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Dave Malcolm 2009-05-26 19:17:20 EDT --- Thanks. Imported into CVS (devel) and built into dist-f12 as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1378455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502689] New: Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502689 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-cppunit - C++ unit testing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-cppunit.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-cppunit-1.12.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: C++ unit testing framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502690] New: Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502690 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-dirac - MinGW Windows dirac compression library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-dirac.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-dirac-1.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows dirac compression library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502691] New: Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502691 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-gdbm - MinGW port of GNU database routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-gdbm.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-gdbm-1.8.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MinGW port of GNU database routines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:26:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502692] New: Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows libatomic_ops compression library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows libatomic_ops compression library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502692 Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libatomic_ops - MinGW Windows libatomic_ops compression library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw32-libatomic_ops-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: MinGW Windows libatomic_ops compression library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:39:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:39:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] New: Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 Summary: Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: justin.gallardo at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, kwade at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Elgg 1.5 SPEC: http://oregonstate.edu/~gallardj/elgg-1.5-1.spec Elgg 1.5 SRPM: http://oregonstate.edu/~gallardj/elgg-1.5-1.src.rpm Description: Elgg is a white label, open source social networking platform. It offers blogging, networking, community, collecting of news using feeds aggregation and file sharing features. Everything can be shared among users with access controls and everything can be cataloged by tags as well. Elgg is written for the LAMP platform (Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP). As this is my first package submission, I'm seeking sponsorship. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262345.n4QNj80G021002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 19:45:07 EDT --- mod_selinux-2.2.1930-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_selinux-2.2.1930-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262354.n4QNsYIc022128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Michael Fleming changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mfleming+rpm at thatfleminggen | |t.com --- Comment #9 from Michael Fleming 2009-05-26 19:54:32 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pyicq-t New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: mfleming -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262359.n4QNx55t022805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Michael Fleming changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jochen at herr-schmitt.de |mfleming+rpm at thatfleminggen | |t.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue May 26 23:59:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 19:59:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905262359.n4QNxiAk031421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Michael Fleming changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 00:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270005.n4R05jng032675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Matthew Truch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Matthew Truch 2009-05-26 20:05:44 EDT --- Whoops, it's 'mtruch'. I should know my own username. Sorry. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slimdata Short Description: Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data Owners: mtruch Branches: F-11 F-10 F-9 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 00:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270006.n4R066mo024090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #9 from KaiGai Kohei 2009-05-26 20:06:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > CVS done, with the caveat that I did not add an InitialCC because we can only > CC FAS accounts (or group accounts), not addresses. Sorry, I misunderstood it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 00:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270010.n4R0AP28000932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 20:10:24 EDT --- lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 00:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270010.n4R0Auej024711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 20:10:55 EDT --- lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 00:30:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:30:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270030.n4R0UkgI004199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #25 from Liang Suilong 2009-05-26 20:30:44 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka If patch -p0 -b --suffix .warning < %{SOURCE1} is replaced by %patch1 -p0 -b .warning , koji will appear errors. You see: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1378575&name=build.log Here is my SPEC file and SRPM: http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.05-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 01:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 21:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502699] New: Review Request: crosstool-ng - A toolchain building utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: crosstool-ng - A toolchain building utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502699 Summary: Review Request: crosstool-ng - A toolchain building utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mike at flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/crosstool-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/crosstool-ng-1.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: crosstool-NG aims at building toolchains. Toolchains are an essential component in a software development project. It will compile, assemble and link the code that is being developed. Some pieces of the toolchain will eventually end up in the resulting binary/ies: static libraries are but an example. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 02:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 22:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270217.n4R2HptN012742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 22:17:50 EDT --- mod_selinux-2.2.1938-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_selinux-2.2.1938-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270318.n4R3I0od024575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 23:17:59 EDT --- perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270318.n4R3I4B1000778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 23:18:04 EDT --- perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270322.n4R3M3jO025500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270325.n4R3Ps89026365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 23:25:53 EDT --- perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270325.n4R3PnQX026331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-26 23:25:49 EDT --- perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270330.n4R3UNdO003465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 03:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 23:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270344.n4R3iwVQ005508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-perl-devel-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-05-26 23:44:56 EDT --- build now available: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1378830 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270405.n4R45Gkq001312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #10 from Dan Fuhry 2009-05-27 00:05:14 EDT --- Hi. I'm the project manager, and your contact for Enano upstream. Here is the official word on these packages and how Enano uses them. Text_Wiki stopped being developed in 2007. Enano forked the last version and customized it heavily. It's now an integral part of Enano; the engine will not work outside of an Enano environment. For now, I honestly think it would be best to include our modified Text_Wiki with the Enano package. We are doing some research on cutting Text_Wiki out of the picture entirely. It was really only a band-aid solution until I could get good enough with PCRE to hack up an engine myself, and now I have that level of knowledge, it's just a matter of finding the time to go through it and build a list of things to parse, design the new engine, and implement it. Patches welcome. TinyMCE is not forked. We actually do not modify the code in their core package at all. But we do throw a few extra files, tinymce_gzip*, into the TinyMCE root. Those ARE modified, because the gzip script's caching feature has to integrate with Enano's. Otherwise, you would have cached files in two locations. From the webmaster's perspective, that is a disaster waiting to happen. In any case, tinymce_gzip.php seems to depend on being in the TinyMCE root. I can fork the hell out of that script for the sake of leaving the rest of TinyMCE alone, or we can distribute TinyMCE with the Enano package, which is probably safer anyway seeing as MoxieCode has historically been very good at breaking their API on us. freeCap is another thing we were forced to fork. The upstream package includes a lot of overhead for deciding on a word to obfuscate into the image, but Enano already took care of that so we had to remove that. Like the TinyMCE caching, Enano has its own way of storing the captcha code and does not and cannot use what freeCap provides. Most other third-party components are single files - small PHP classes I found on the net or borrowed from other projects because I didn't have the knowledge to write them myself. This is the case with MediaWiki's table engine, phpWiki's diff engine, etc. I'm not going to write out and get approval for packages for a couple hundred KB of code from 10+ different sources. Reusing code != one copy on the entire system. That's the gist of things. Please take these into consideration and re-evaluate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270442.n4R4g7E9018083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 00:42:06 EDT --- python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270442.n4R4g2w6009803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 00:42:01 EDT --- python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270443.n4R4hGWP010003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Bug 499483 depends on bug 468227, which changed state. Bug 468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270443.n4R4hCXk009911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Luke Macken 2009-05-27 00:43:11 EDT --- Imported, tagged, built, and pending a push to F10/F11 updates. Thanks all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270443.n4R4hIUd010055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Bug 501576 depends on bug 468227, which changed state. Bug 468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:43:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:43:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270443.n4R4hHea010031@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Bug 501566 depends on bug 468227, which changed state. Bug 468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468228] Review Request: python-tg-ext-repoze-who - repoze.who plugins for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270443.n4R4hEEZ009945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468228 Bug 468228 depends on bug 468227, which changed state. Bug 468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 04:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468805] Review Request: python-tgext-authorization - Authorization for TurboGears 2 applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270443.n4R4hFuJ009974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468805 Bug 468805 depends on bug 468227, which changed state. Bug 468227 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 06:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270606.n4R66upY008051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 02:06:56 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 06:06:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:06:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270606.n4R66kp8007985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 02:06:44 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 06:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 02:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270606.n4R66pnH031985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 02:06:50 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 07:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270724.n4R7O7K3029770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #10 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-27 03:24:06 EDT --- Hmm, ok so no F-11 updates not F-11 updates-testing in there. Note that even if you did have that it still wont build as you also need the ftgl from F-12. So I guess its best to wait till rawhide unfreezes from F-11 and becomes F-12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 07:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270744.n4R7ihut000781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #22 from MATSUURA Takanori 2009-05-27 03:44:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345573) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345573) Updated dpec file I have updated spec file from that Henrique was generated. With this spec file, I get only one warning: $ rpmlint gluegen-1.0-0.20090527.svn.fc10.x86_64.rpm gluegen.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libgluegen-rt.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I'm not familiar with this issue. So I hope someone will help for this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 07:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270745.n4R7jajl025283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 MATSUURA Takanori changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345573|Updated dpec file |Updated spec file description| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 07:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270754.n4R7sWrD002718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 --- Comment #1 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-27 03:54:31 EDT --- I found a little bug in my spec file, so I resolved this. Daemon did not start at starting of X (runlevel 5), so I added line to correct this. Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/btnx.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/btnx-0.4.11-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 07:58:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 03:58:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270758.n4R7weJp003550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #23 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-27 03:58:39 EDT --- Having gluegen splitted isn't that difficult, what remains harder is to have this version of gluegen used to build jogl. (at least, last time I've tried). (then jogl used by openjdk will be the next step) soname is stand for Shared Object NAME, aka the internal name of the library which is defined at link time. usually readelf -a any_system_library.so.x |grep SONAME will show you the one used to recognize the library. But I don't know how ant do to generate soname nor if that's usefull for a java architecture dependant package. (I guess it is). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 08:17:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 04:17:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270817.n4R8HhNq008414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Gratien D'haese changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #20 from Gratien D'haese 2009-05-27 04:17:39 EDT --- * fully agree with the comments in #17 - thanks for the in-depth analysis Mamoru ==> the legal issue must be fixed * man page sslogger contains an error: FILES /etc/sloger.conf << /etc/sslogger.conf Configuration file * Concerning "replay" - I agree it would be better to rename it to e.g. slreplay $ replay /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log Sending output to: /dev/pts/4 /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log: Permission denied End replay ==> replay can only be used by people part of group sloggers. Why can a plain user not replay his own logs? ==> replay man page missing ==> some useful functions are still missing in replay such as find. I would rather see "/" as find symbol, rather then "f" (try to follow vi syntax) * It is rather confusing to see sometimes slogger and then sslogger and then sl e.g. in config.h: #define SLOGGER sslogger * The "-h" option is not respected: $ sl -h [sudo] password for gdha: $ sslogger -h Sloggerd started, file is /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-gdha-2009.05.27-10:04:37.log Reason for invoking thus interactive shell for gdha: * Found lots of spelling errors in source files and in the man page * why not combining the -u option in sslogger itself? Why using sl for that purpose? * The sl.log file contains not enough information where the log file itself is stored: # cat /var/log/sl/sl.log 2009-05-27 09:24:39 sslogger[30880]; user:gdha; as:root; invoked_shell:"/bin/bash"; logfile:sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log; reason:test sslogger Actual location is: /var/log/sl/2009/05/sl-fed-gdha-root-2009.05.27-09:24:31.log To use replay (or cat) it would be better to log the full path of the log file. * why do I read in the log file Sloggerd started - it should read sslogger started # ps ax|grep ssl 31720 pts/2 S+ 0:00 sslogger 31721 pts/2 S+ 0:00 sslogger -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 09:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 05:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] New: Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Summary: Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: shakthimaan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mcu8051ide.spec SRPM URL: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Integrated Development Enviroment for some MCS-51 based microcontrollers (e.g. AT89S8253). Supported languages are assembly and C. First package! Need sponsor! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 09:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 05:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270911.n4R9BerJ012603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 09:20:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 05:20:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270920.n4R9KEPK023621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 09:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 05:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270935.n4R9Zcr9028402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-27 05:35:36 EDT --- Package Review was started on : https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/19 and now continuing here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 09:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 05:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905270957.n4R9vRrl026670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-27 05:57:26 EDT --- By the way mock build fails even for dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1379204 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271025.n4RAPnxC009040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #24 from Takanori MATSUURA 2009-05-27 06:25:47 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345591) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345591) Updated spec fie with manual as a separated package We hope jogl will bundled as a Fedora package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271025.n4RAPPgI001326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-27 06:25:23 EDT --- #01: This is a no-arch application. Add BuildArch: noarch to the spec file #02: rpmlint on SRPM rpmlint package helps to qualify a SRPM or a RPM. It should be applied to every RPM produced by the spec file. Errors and warnings should be corrected. A common fix list of errors and warnings is listed on : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues rpmlint /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm mcu8051ide.src: E: description-line-too-long Integrated Development Enviroment for some MCS-51 based microcontrollers (e.g. AT89S8253). Supported languages are assembly and C. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings Break it into several lines. #03: Keeping timestamps Can you patch the install.sh file so that during cp timestamps are preserved. cp --> cp -p There are some typos in the install.sh files as well : example: successuful, Unistallation Then send the patch to upstream. #04: rpmlint on the RPM Here there are several errors and warnings. In most cases the fix should be in the %prep stage. # rpmlint : hidden-file-or-dir, backup-file-in-package and zero-length rm lib/.tex* rm lib/.html in %install # rpmlint : non-executable-script chmod 0755 %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/lib/*.tcl Tip: To check the permissions of the files of a RPM without installing the rpm $ rpm -qvlp /home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mcu8051ide-1.1-2.fc10.noarch.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:34:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:34:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271034.n4RAYore011127@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #3 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-05-27 06:34:49 EDT --- #05: dedundant BRs: - tk-devel already requires tcl-devel, Actually do we need BRs "tcl-devel, tk-devel, tkimg, itcl, tdom, tcllib, bwidget, rxvt-unicode" here as the rpmbuild is simply a copy process? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:39:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:39:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271039.n4RAdeac012330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 06:39:39 EDT --- task-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/task-1.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478749] Review Request: dinotrace - X11 waveform viewer for electronics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271041.n4RAf4d5012981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478749 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271042.n4RAgBe9005418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 06:42:10 EDT --- task-1.7.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/task-1.7.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 10:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 06:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502818] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502818 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dns - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Dns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-dns/sblim-cmpi-dns.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-dns/sblim-cmpi-dns-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The cmpi-dns package provides access to the dns configuration data via CIMOM technology/infrastructure. It contains the Dns CIM Model, CMPI Provider with the Samba task specific Resource Access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271103.n4RB30LD010959@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-27 07:02:57 EDT --- Any progress here? What issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:13:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271113.n4RBD8Pf021267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org --- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-27 07:13:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Disabling the latex generation causes all arches to build successfully. > > Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=981048 Within Fedora versions prior to 10 (as well as for all the RedHat/CentOS versions, including EL-5), the Latex package was TeTex, whereas it is now TexLive. An example of how to handle the different packages corresponding to different versions is given in http://rmol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rmol/trunk/rmol/rmol.spec.in?revision=214&view=markup Basically, you may use the following: %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: texlive-latex, texlive-dvips %endif %if 0%{?fedora} < 10 BuildRequires: tetex-latex, tetex-dvips %endif BuildRequires: doxygen, ghostscript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:21:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:21:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271121.n4RBLlSx023370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 --- Comment #12 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-27 07:21:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > By the way mock build fails even for dist-f12: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1379204 Woops, my bad, here is a fixed version: Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/chromium-bsu-0.9.14-3.fc11.src.rpm And here is a working koji scratch build of it: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1379288 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: WordNet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271134.n4RBY6TS026529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #16 from steve 2009-05-27 07:34:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) Thanks for your time and comments spot. Sorry about the slip-ups, this is the first time I played around with autotools and have learned a lot in the process. > Well, if you're going to use a shared library here, you should do it properly, > as a versioned .so, with proper packaging. > > libWN_la_LDFLAGS = -version-number 3:0:0 > > will give you what you want, although, you might talk to upstream to be sure > they're okay with the .so numbering starting there. > I did mail upstream about this but got no response back. I also checked other distributions (ubuntu and mandriva) and they seem to be using version 3.x.x for the .so ...so, i went with that. > Don't forget to delete the .la and .a file, your -devel wildcard is catching > them. See why wildcards are tricky! :) Yep ! ...and Done > Also, you need to change a few things to ensure that the autotooling happens > cleanly, specifically: > > * BuildRequires: libtool > * autoreconf -i instead of just autoreconf Done The new spec and srpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-6.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271136.n4RBakjj020361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-27 07:36:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271136.n4RBaQ54020261@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-27 07:36:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > It looks like the native 'ar' is used (/usr/bin/ar) instead of > i686-pc-mingw32-ar. This might need some further investigation. I thought too that ar was just a simple archiver. But I fixed this anyway. > Another issue I noticed in the .spec file is this: > if a2dll libboost_thread-mt.lib libboost_thread-mt "-lpthreadGC2"; then > As of mingw32-pthreads-2.8.0-8{.fc11,.fc12} it isn't necessary to use > '-lpthreadGC2' anymore. It should be sufficient to use just '-lpthread' here. I've seen you made the change too, but it seems it hasn't propagated yet to my mirror. Anyway, I would like to keep it that way for some time until your change has fully propagated... > For the link errors in the testsuite libraries. I might have found out a way to > get it operational as shared libraries. Would it be possible to add a main() > function to those testsuite libraries which looks something like this: Sure, if you write your own dynamic linker :) Seriously though, this is quite a lot of work to implement, I won't have time to do this in the next couple of weeks. If someone else wants to give it a try, be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Simple multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271144.n4RBiPBa029455@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2009-05-27 07:44:23 EDT --- I had a package ready to go, but waiting on a few blocker bugs being fixed upstream, so here's my comments based on my version of the spec: - Use %{__python} not python - From what I gathered, loads of missing Requires: Requires: dbus-python Requires: pycairo Requires: pygtk2 Requires: gstreamer-python Requires: gstreamer-plugins-good gstreamer-plugins-base - I'd remove "Simple" from the descriptions, and say "easy-to-use" instead. Simple implies "not featureful". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271147.n4RBleIc022829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:47:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:47:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271147.n4RBlLxQ022788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-27 07:47:20 EDT --- Hi. I'll take this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:56:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:56:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271156.n4RBuCco032464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #4 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-27 07:56:11 EDT --- License* ------------------------------------------------------ COPYING file says GPLv2 or higher. You should change license to mentioned one. By the way you could contact upstream and tell him to include license in header of source files. ------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 11:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271158.n4RBw1uD032726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 --- Comment #20 from Sergio Pascual 2009-05-27 07:57:59 EDT --- A few quick comments: * Please use command names consistently, you have both %{__python} and rm for example. I recommend using python and rm (in the other hand, you can use %{__python} and %{__rm}). * "screenlets-manager > /dev/null" doesn't work. You don't have to redirect stdout, it goes automatically to .xsession-errors on a graphic sessions. A simple Exec=screenlets-manager in screenlets-manager.desktop does the job. * You can join all the %{_bindir}/screenlets-whatever in %{_bindir}/* * The directory %{_datadir}/icons/ for screenlets.svg seems wrong to me. In my system is the only icon present there. I suggest /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps and add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme * You must update the icon cache after installing screenlets.svg. See the details here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 12:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271215.n4RCFBfD030575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: arista - |Review Request: arista - |Simple multimedia |Easy to use multimedia |transcoder for the GNOME |transcoder for the GNOME |Desktop |Desktop --- Comment #2 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-05-27 08:15:09 EDT --- oops, I had deleted the Requires. Added back, added disttag. Changed python to macro and replace simple with easy to use. Added desktop-file-validate as well. Take a look http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/arista.spec http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/arista-0.9.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 12:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502834] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502834 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-samba - SBLIM WBEM-SMT Samba Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-samba/sblim-cmpi-samba.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-samba/sblim-cmpi-samba-0.5.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The cmpi-samba package provides access to the samba configuration data via CIMOM technology/infrastructure. It contains the Samba CIM Model, CMPI Provider with the Samba task specific Resource Access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 12:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271233.n4RCXTve009909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-27 08:33:28 EDT --- Looks good to me. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 12:50:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271250.n4RCo0Ot007196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-27 08:49:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Looks good to me. > > APPROVED. Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: chromium-bsu Short Description: Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter Owners: jwrdegoede Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 12:51:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 08:51:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502839] New: Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502839 Summary: Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eugene_beast at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: ftp://223-223.ru/pub/fedora/specs/nginx.spec SRPM URL: ftp://223-223.ru/pub/fedora/misc/SRPMS/nginx-0.6.36-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Nginx [engine x] is an HTTP(S) server, HTTP(S) reverse proxy and IMAP/POP3 proxy server written by Igor Sysoev. In the stock Fedora nginx package there is only one third party module included, nginx-upstream-fair. However, nginx by itself provides very poor authentication support (only HTTP Basic Auth is actually supported). There's a PAM Auth module available for nginx (see full list of 3rd party modules here http://wiki.nginx.org/Nginx3rdPartyModules#Auth_PAM_Module). With this module been included we could have a vast number of authentication options enabled, as almost everything is supported through the PAM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 13:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502843] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502843 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-fsvol - SBLIM fsvol instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-fsvol/sblim-cmpi-fsvol.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-fsvol/sblim-cmpi-fsvol-1.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Fsvol Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 13:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271343.n4RDhghM020989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #4 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-05-27 09:43:41 EDT --- #01 - Done #02 - Done #03 - Done #04 - Done. But, I get: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mcu8051ide-1.1-3.fc10.noarch.rpm mcu8051ide.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency tcllib tcllib is required runtime, so I have to explicitly specify it. #05 The configure script calls cmake, and does BR library checks. So, it is required. === configure OUTPUT === $ ./configure -- The C compiler identification is GNU -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- works -- Detecting C compiler ABI info -- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/c++ -- works -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info -- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done Check for Tcl Interpreter -- Found Tclsh: /usr/bin/tclsh -- Found TCL: /usr/lib/libtcl.so -- Found TCLTK: /usr/lib/libtcl.so -- Found TK: /usr/lib/libtk.so Check for BWidget Check for Itcl Check for Tcl Check for md5 Check for Tk Check for img::png Check for tdom -- Configuring done -- Generating done === END === Please take .spec release 3: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mcu8051ide.spec http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 13:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] New: Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Summary: Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pokerth.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pokerth-0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PokerTH is a poker game written in C++/QT4. You can play the popular "Texas Hold'em" poker variant against up to six computer-opponents or play network games with people all over the world. This poker engine is available for Linux, Windows, and MacOSX. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 14:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502854] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502854 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv3 - SBLIM nfsv3 instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3/sblim-cmpi-nfsv3-1.0.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Nfsv3 Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 14:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] New: Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Summary: Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain-0.99-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: PDF Chain is a GUI for pdftk written with gtkmm. You can merge some pdf files to one pdf file or split. There are also some options and tools. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271511.n4RFBg5T019710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502870 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:24:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271524.n4RFO2QC018706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 11:24:00 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271525.n4RFPhSi024191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502878 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:25:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:25:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271525.n4RFP2Se019349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 11:25:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:30:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:30:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 200310] Review Request: pyicq-t - ICQ transport for Jabber servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271530.n4RFUurK021185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200310 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 11:30:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271535.n4RFZIaX027214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 11:35:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-repoze-who-testutil Short Description: Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications Owners: spot Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: ...and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271534.n4RFYxQL026780@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 11:34:58 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: woodardworks-laconic-fonts Short Description: An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family Owners: spot Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redhat.com ... and it's done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271539.n4RFdYIo023426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-27 11:39:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > So I have created a new xsd package for Fedora here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Sorry, I completely missed your message of this. I will check this later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271539.n4RFdxvZ028243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 15:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271543.n4RFhthC025056@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: WordNet - A |Review Request: wordnet - A |lexical database for the |lexical database for the |english language |english language Alias|WordNet |wordnet --- Comment #17 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-05-27 11:43:54 EDT --- Fixing the title to match the package so that review reports count it right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271616.n4RGG6Ls003660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-05-27 12:16:04 EDT --- Your comments explain why you've decided to bundle the libraries in with enano. What they do not do is explain how you've mitigated the problems with bundling libraries: 1) Bundling libraries means that whenever a security issue comes up in a library we have to first find the applications that bundle those libraries, then fix the version in that application (which could be an older version or forked from mainline and so not just a matter of applying an update). 2) We have to audit the code to find out if there are licensing issues. With just a quick look at the code, I've found that: * includes/captcha/engine_failsafe.php: is GPL (v2 only) (so Enano as a whole would need to be GPLv2 only, not GPLv2 or later.) * includes/clientside/admin-menu.js: the Tigra Tree Menu should be looked at by spot/FSF. The term "header" needs to be clarified and we need to know if this usage is in compliance. * includes/wikiengine/Render/Plain/Prefilter.php: is licensed under the PHP license v2.0 which is GPL incompatible. So it's use with Enano might not be okay. * includes/graphs.php: is licensed under the PHP license v3.01 whichisGPL incompatible. Once again, this might not be okay. * includes/graphs.php also has this sketchy bit of text: """ // Graph Generator for PHP // Originally located at http://szewo.com/php/graph, but link was broken, so this file was retrieved from: // http://web.archive.org/web/20030130065944/szewo.com/php/graph/graph.class.php3.txt // License unknown, however sources on the web have shown this to be either GPL or public domain. """ If the link is broken and the license is unknown, what leads you to think that the code is public domain? At best some citation is missing. At worst, this has to be removed/remaining pieces will need to be rewritten for Enano. * There are many files that reference external files for the details of their license information, for example GPL-LICENSE.txt Remember, this wasn't an exhaustive search -- it was only a series of quick greps to look for especially problematic files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271626.n4RGQKhe010969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:26:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:26:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502839] Review Request: nginx - should include Auth PAM Module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271626.n4RGQ2Lb006453@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502839 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-27 12:26:01 EDT --- You should file a bug against nginx itself, rather than adding this review request. Please, notify Fedora's nginx maintainer via bugzilla or maybe even directly. All necessary information can be obtained here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/nginx That's why I'm closing this ticket. O/T you may find it interesting to discuss some aspects of Fedora development in russian language in unofficial xmpp conference: fedora-devel at conference.jabber.ru -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271629.n4RGThhg011708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-27 12:29:41 EDT --- I'm just curious - why it requires rxvt-unicode for both building and working? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271637.n4RGb9aL013948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:37:08 EDT --- python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:38:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271638.n4RGcjIO010039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:38:44 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271637.n4RGb4hg009730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:37:04 EDT --- python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271638.n4RGceZO014436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:38:40 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:38:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:38:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271638.n4RGcof0014495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 12:38:49 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271642.n4RGgk57011619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |497719 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 16:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271649.n4RGna7R013485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-27 12:49:35 EDT --- Tank you. The licensing guideline says "If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll use COPYING to imply that it is under the GPL, all versions (GPL+)." That's why I used GPL+. Please see case #4 at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ I already asked Hermann to include the GPL version in the source headers a while ago (around guitarix-0.04-2) but he didn't do it. I guess we will have to live with what we have. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:08:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:08:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271708.n4RH89KQ022878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #18 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 13:08:07 EDT --- %files ... %{_libdir}/libWN.so* %files devel ... %{_libdir}/libWN.so* You're double-packaging those files. The .so.* go in the main package, and the .so goes into the -devel package. It should be: %files ... %{_libdir}/libWN.so.* %files devel ... %{_libdir}/libWN.so You're also missing the necessary %post and %postun invocations for packages with shared libraries, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271720.n4RHK4nM026025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #10 from Paul Fox 2009-05-27 13:20:02 EDT --- this review has been stalled for several weeks. i'm hoping that soon some of the pressure will ease on fedora folk, and that perhaps we can pick it up again? the above URLs for the 6-1 version of the package are still valid, but on checking just now, there was a discrepancy between the sizes of what was on the web vs. what was in my build tree, so i've rebuilt and re-uploaded to dev.laptop.org, just in case. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271726.n4RHQ1e0027687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-27 13:25:59 EDT --- ! About Licensing: - While most files in the source archives are under GPLv2+ with exceptions which contains the clause to allow the linkage against xerces-c which are under ASL 2.0, some files are strict GPLv2. Then with "verbose=yes", build.log shows (for example): ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 96 g++ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386/i486/i586/i686 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386/i486/i586 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386/i486 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/i386 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/arch/generic -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2 -I/builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/../install/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.o -c /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.cxx 102 ar -rc /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/libcult.a /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/eh/exception.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/mm/new.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/mm/counter.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/mm/buffer.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/rtti/type-info.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/trace/log.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/file-arguments.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/scanner.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/options.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/options-parser.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/options-spec.o 306 g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/xsd /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/xsd.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/elements.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/elements.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/validator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/name-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/type-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/state-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/generator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-inline.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/parser-forward.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/impl-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/impl-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/driver-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/element-validation-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/attribute-validation-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/parser/characters-validation-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/elements.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/validator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/counter.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/name-processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/generator.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-forward.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-inline.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/tree-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/parser-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/parser-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/stream-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/stream-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/serialization-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/serialization-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/stream-insertion-header.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/stream-insertion-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/cxx/tree/stream-extraction-source.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/type-map/lexer.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/type-map/parser.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/processing/cardinality/processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/xsd/processing/inheritance/processor.o /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/../install/lib/libxsd-frontend.a /builddir/build/BUILD/xsd-3.2.0+dep/xsd-3.2.0-2/../install/lib/libcult.a /usr/lib/libboost_filesystem.so /usr/lib/libboost_regex.so /usr/lib/libxerces-c.so ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here - libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.cxx is under GPLv2 - Building xsd binary uses both * libcult.a (which contains libcult-1.4.2/cult/cli/arguments.o), which is under GPLv2 * and libxerces-c.so which is under ASL 2.0 They are incompatible according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing I guess the possible way to resolve this license conflict is to relicense all files in this source tarball which are under GPLv2 to GPLv2+ (or GPLv2+ with exceptions: note that ASL 2.0 is compatible with GPLv3) Setting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:31:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:31:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271731.n4RHVJoC029335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-27 13:31:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > CVS done. Thanks, imported and build, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:30:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:30:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271730.n4RHUeK3025059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-27 13:30:37 EDT --- Reviewing as the flags policy has been suspended for now. Full review done: MUST FIX -------- * The docs are currently duplicated between the main package and the -docs package. put the README, COPYING etc only in the main package and the rest in the -docs package * Make the -docs package Require the main package (with full evr) * Upstream source files are AWOL (newer RC?) so I cannot verify the origin of the files included in the srpm SHOULD FIX ---------- * Why aren't you using %configure, if there is a specific reason not to please add a comment explaining this to the .spec file * Don't untar %{SOURCE1} in %build instead add " -a 1" as extra arguments to %setup, or even better take a look at generating the docs buildtime as suggested in comment #14 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:36:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470727] Review Request: slimdata - Tools and library for reading and writing slim compressed data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271736.n4RHagfv031213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470727 Matthew Truch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Matthew Truch 2009-05-27 13:36:39 EDT --- Building now (or already done) with pushes soon thereafter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271735.n4RHZCr2030788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-27 13:35:10 EDT --- Okay, now I approve this package. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (xml-security-c) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271740.n4RHeBlv032407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271751.n4RHpxHQ031604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 502894, which changed state. Bug 502894 Summary: Add libmbca support to NetworkManager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502894 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |UPSTREAM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271758.n4RHwf7S000985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-27 13:58:40 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill with naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Package contains most recent release of the application + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 0ede5640b1c6f0f2f513e992b60a261f) + Package contains valid License tag + License tags excalim GPLV3+ as an valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Consistently rpm macro usage + Package doesn't contains subpackages + Proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned on beginning of %clean and %install + RPM_OPT_FLAGS will be honour on build step + Build step support smp enabled make + Local build works fine + No complaints from rpmlint for source rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for binary rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for debuginfo rpm + Debuginfo package contains sources + Local install/uninstall works fine + Short test of the application looks fine. + Files has proper files permissions + All package files are owned by the package + %files stanza contains no duplicated entries + %doc stanzs is small, so we don't need an extra subpackage + Package contains proper Changelog Bad: - Source header indicates GPLv3 as license instead of GPLv3+ Please talk with upstream for clarification - Scratch build failed on koji Please see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380090 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 17:58:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 13:58:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271758.n4RHw0dT005230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #19 from steve 2009-05-27 13:57:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > > You're double-packaging those files. The .so.* go in the main package, and the > .so goes into the -devel package. It should be: > ... Done. > > You're also missing the necessary %post and %postun invocations for packages > with shared libraries, see: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries Yep ! Sorry about that ...something I forgot. Done. As always, thanks for your time. The new spec and srpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-7.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:19:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:19:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271819.n4RIJWxB006254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-27 14:19:31 EDT --- I have try to make a first look on this package. Unfortunately, I could found any java sources. The wrapper script try to call a java class which I could found in this package. It may nice, if you can give me a explaination. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271821.n4RILRT1007012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #20 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 14:21:26 EDT --- rpmlint says: wordnet.src:107: W: macro-in-%changelog files wordnet.src:109: W: macro-in-%changelog pre (it also says: wordnet.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libWN.so.3.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 but that is reasonably safe to ignore) Just use %%macro instead of %macro when you mention things in the changelog. Oh, and you should also get in the habit of running rpmlint on your packages after you build them. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271833.n4RIXTFx009863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-27 14:33:28 EDT --- Note: I can't get this to build on F10 due to missing /usr/include/boost/asio.hpp, in F11 it builds fine, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271832.n4RIWjQK009779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 14:32:44 EDT --- > I guess the possible way to resolve this license conflict is to > relicense all files in this source tarball which are under GPLv2 > to GPLv2+ (or GPLv2+ with exceptions: note that ASL 2.0 is compatible > with GPLv3). Either option would be acceptable, please reach out to upstream and have them correct it one way or the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271839.n4RIdnaX011013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-27 14:39:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Bad: > - Source header indicates GPLv3 as license instead of GPLv3+ > Please talk with upstream for clarification Good catch. The license tag is from Leigh's spec. Should've checked it myself. Send an email upstream. > - Scratch build failed on koji > Please see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380090 Duh, should've checked this too :) OK, missing BR and license have been fixed. I set the license to GPLv3 as it is more restrictive than GPLv3+, I can change it when upstream replies. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pdfchain-0.99-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271845.n4RIjfrx013054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-27 14:45:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I have try to make a first look on this package. > > Unfortunately, I could found any java sources. > > The wrapper script try to call a java class which I could found in this > package. > > It may nice, if you can give me a explaination. Yes. The 389-console package just provides the "skin" or "flavor" for the console. The console implementation package is idm-console-framework, which is a requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271848.n4RImixZ016913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #21 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 14:48:42 EDT --- Because the original copyright holder on sslogger.c is the Regents of the University of California, this isn't a problem (because they have dropped the advertising clause on all code they are the copyright holder for). I've been meaning to write this up as a FAQ entry for some time now, and this was a good reminder: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#BSD_with_advertising Please ask upstream to remove the advertising clause from that file. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 18:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271851.n4RIpv3x014446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-27 14:51:56 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC files matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + Package contains valid license tag + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Could download sources via spectool -g + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 0357fee5f1ab61e7ead345a2c76cd3b6) + License tag state GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Package doesn't contains subpacakges + Package has proper Provides/Obsoles statement for renaming + Proper Buildroot defintion + Buildroot will be cleaned on beginning of %clean and %install + Package contains SMP-enabled build + Local build works fine + Build use $RPM_OPT_FLAGS as compiler flags + No complaints from rpmlint for source rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for binary rpm + No complaints from rpmlint for debuginfo rpm + Debuginfo contains sources + Files has proper file permission + %file stanza doesn't contains dupblicated entries + All package files are owned by this package + Ther are no other package which claims one of the package files + %doc stanza is small. + Chagelog stanza has proper format Bad: - LICENSE file state GPLV2+ as license - Header files state GPLv2 with exception or GPLv2 as license - Package doesn't contains verbatin copy of the license - Scratch build fails on koji (Please refer to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380175) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:02:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:02:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271902.n4RJ2V2V020147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-05-27 15:02:30 EDT --- Ok, now the koji scratch build works fine, so I can APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:03:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:03:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271903.n4RJ3nST017178@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.3004-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271903.n4RJ3iRZ017142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:03:43 EDT --- perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271904.n4RJ4OgK017313@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.43-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271904.n4RJ4JVV017268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:04:06 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:07:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271907.n4RJ7WfK021909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.04-1.fc11 |0.04-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:04:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271904.n4RJ4Uur020797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:04:30 EDT --- perl-XML-Feed-0.43-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271906.n4RJ6Oq2021585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:06:23 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:04:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501099] Review Request: perl-XML-Feed - Syndication feed parser and auto-discovery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271904.n4RJ4Yhr020828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501099 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.43-1.fc10 |0.43-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:06:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271906.n4RJ6TcN021626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.00002-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271907.n4RJ7SNc019115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:07:27 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271907.n4RJ7IqC019041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:07:17 EDT --- perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN-0.04-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271907.n4RJ7wLD019187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.00002-1.fc10 |0.00002-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500197] Review Request: perl-Text-Emoticon-MSN - Emoticon filter of MSN Messenger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271907.n4RJ7M9q019077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500197 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.04-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:08:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:08:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271908.n4RJ8Hjo019255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-27 15:08:15 EDT --- Thanks for the speedy review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pdfchain Short Description: A GUI for pdftk Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271908.n4RJ8DAj022404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:08:12 EDT --- perl-XML-RSS-LibXML-0.3004-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501098] Review Request: perl-XML-RSS-LibXML - XML::RSS with XML::LibXML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271908.n4RJ8Ir9022439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501098 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3004-1.fc11 |0.3004-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499773] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn - Automatically encode columns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271907.n4RJ7rh0022268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499773 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:07:53 EDT --- perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00002-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:14:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:14:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] New: Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Summary: Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/eggdbus.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/eggdbus-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271914.n4RJEmOe023646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:14:47 EDT --- python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:15:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:15:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] New: Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Summary: Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit-0.92-0.git20090527.fc11.src.rpm Description: PolicyKit Authorization Framework This depends on eggdbus, see bug 502918. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271914.n4RJEgmG021049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:14:42 EDT --- python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271916.n4RJGVVi021915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(tibbs at math.uh.edu | |) | --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 15:16:29 EDT --- I kept waiting for python-coverage to make it into rawhide so I could build this, but it turns out that the mock configs don't reference the update repos at all so that never would have worked. Oh, well. rpmlint is now clean (barring the expected no-documentation complaint) and the tests seem to work (or at least nothing fails). Nothing left for me to complain about. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:15:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:15:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] New: Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Summary: Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: davidz at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit-gnome.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/polkit-gnome-0.92-0.git20090527.fc11.src.rpm Description: PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop. This depends on polkit, see bug 502919. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:24:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:24:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271924.n4RJOLpY023317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 15:24:20 EDT --- sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11,sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11,sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271921.n4RJLt8D022967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-05-27 15:21:53 EDT --- Pushed. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:24:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271924.n4RJO2kf023201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #21 from steve 2009-05-27 15:24:01 EDT --- > > Just use %%macro instead of %macro when you mention things in the changelog. Done. Although I didn't change the version for this trivial change. Hope that's ok. > Oh, and you should also get in the habit of running rpmlint on your packages > after you build them. :) Yep ! Will do. Hope that all. The latest spec and src rpm are at: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-7.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271949.n4RJn7wQ028439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Luke Macken 2009-05-27 15:49:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-repoze-what Short Description: Authorization for WSGI applications Owners: lmacken Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] New: Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Summary: Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/sk1/sk1.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/sk1/sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator ------------------- koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380257 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271950.n4RJo88A028901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #22 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-27 15:50:05 EDT --- Last thing, sorry for not noticing it earlier: You've currently got: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc AUTHORS COPYING INSTALL ChangeLog README doc/{html,ps,pdf} ... %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/dict/* %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/html/* %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/pdf/* %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/ps/* %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/lib/wnres/* There are two problems here. 1. You're not owning the %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ dir, just the directories beneath it. You can solve this problem by replacing the subdirs with wildcards with simply: %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ That translates into "own this directory and all files and directories underneath it". 2. You're packaging up duplicate copies of the same html,ps,pdf docs, in two different location. The ones in %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc/ don't have %doc attribution, so they should just be manually removed after make install is done. # Remove duplicate copies of docs installed by make install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc Show me a new spec with both issues fixed and I'll finish this review off and sponsor you. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:57:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271957.n4RJvhiD030451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 15:57:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 19:57:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 15:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905271957.n4RJv0lP030348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 15:56:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:40:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:40:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272040.n4RKeIrx009665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 16:40:17 EDT --- pdfchain-0.99-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfchain-0.99-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272039.n4RKdaAh009194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 16:39:35 EDT --- pdfchain-0.99-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pdfchain-0.99-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272043.n4RKhYbT010092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 21:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272116.n4RLG92M014428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-27 17:16:08 EDT --- and one more thing -%configure --enable-gtk-doc +%configure --enable-gtk-doc --disable-static which spares few cycles and allows removing rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 21:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272105.n4RL5Ud8012399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 17:05:26 EDT --- OK, looks good to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272056.n4RKuZgu010102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 16:56:33 EDT --- Indeed, this builds fine. The complaints I had seem to be all solved now, and the package looks OK to me. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 21:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272111.n4RLB2Zv016328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-27 17:11:01 EDT --- Missing BuildRequires: gtk-doc -%{_datadir}/man/* +%{_datadir}/man/man1/* perhaps Group: Development/Libraries for lack of anything better URL: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~david/eggdbus -make +make %{?_smp_mflags} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 21:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272111.n4RLBkgx016496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Remko Bijker changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rubidium at openttd.org --- Comment #17 from Remko Bijker 2009-05-27 17:11:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > * Upstream source files are AWOL (newer RC?) so I cannot verify the origin > of the files included in the srpm All official releases OpenTTD release (ever) can be found at either http://binaries.openttd.org/releases/ or at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=103924&package_id=111717 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272042.n4RKgg7W006924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 16:42:41 EDT --- towhee-6.2.3-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/towhee-6.2.3-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272043.n4RKhX9B007005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-27 16:43:32 EDT --- towhee-6.2.3-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/towhee-6.2.3-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272043.n4RKhqVS010143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464432] Review Request: octopus - a TDDFT code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272046.n4RKkAw3010708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464432 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-27 16:46:07 EDT --- Nothing has still happened, closing the bug as deferred. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494520] Review Request: cdf - The NASA Common Data Format implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272045.n4RKjapB007508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494520 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-27 16:45:34 EDT --- Ugh, no reply. Closing as deferred. If the license changes this can be picked up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 21:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 17:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272152.n4RLq00h024984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #23 from steve 2009-05-27 17:51:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Last thing, sorry for not noticing it earlier: Thanks, you've been very patient. This is my first submission but still that ought not to be an excuse for some of the basic things i've overlooked :). Anyways, ... > There are two problems here. > > 1. You're not owning the %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ dir, just the > directories beneath it. > You can solve this problem by replacing the subdirs with wildcards with simply: > %{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > > That translates into "own this directory and all files and directories > underneath it". Done. > # Remove duplicate copies of docs installed by make install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}-%{version}/doc Done. > > Show me a new spec with both issues fixed and I'll finish this review off and > sponsor you. :) Here goes: http://www.lonetwin.net/wordnet.spec http://lonetwin.net/wordnet-3.0-8.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272033.n4RKXHEt005395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 20:32:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:32:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272032.n4RKWewj008070@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #6 from Igor Juri?kovi? 2009-05-27 16:32:39 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. YES MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. YES MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. YES MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. YES MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. YES MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. YES MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. YES MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. YES MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. YES MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. YES MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. YES MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. YES MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. YES MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. YES MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. YES MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. YES MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. YES MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). N/A MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. YES MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} N/A MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. N/A MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. YES MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. YES MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). YES MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. YES Don't see any blockers. _________________________________ ( Package guitarix is APPROVED by ) ( igjurisk. ) --------------------------------- o ^__^ o (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225809] Merge Review: gmp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272216.n4RMGEEG029296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225809 --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 18:16:10 EDT --- I note that 4.3.1 has recently been released, but that doesn't really have any bearing on this review. There is no reason for: Requires(post): /sbin/install-info Requires(preun): /sbin/install-info because you're using the "-p" forms of the scriptlets: %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig The license of the demos is GPL, not LGPL, but those aren't packaged so the license tag is correct. The README file is duplicated between the three packages; it should not be. Normally I would complain about such a generic name as /usr/include/mp.h, but this package has been around approximately forever. So I see only two minor issues. If you like, I can just go ahead and fix them up and call this done. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 5420b0e558a69a53b36f2b2c70a69f547e075d98366a585fc80cbbcce1efe368 gmp-4.2.4.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: gmp-4.2.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm libgmp.so.3()(64bit) libgmpxx.so.4()(64bit) libmp.so.3()(64bit) gmp = 4.2.4-6.fc11 gmp(x86-64) = 4.2.4-6.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libgmp.so.3()(64bit) libgmpxx.so.4()(64bit) libmp.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4.11)(64bit) gmp-devel-4.2.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm gmp-devel = 4.2.4-6.fc11 gmp-devel(x86-64) = 4.2.4-6.fc11 = /bin/sh /sbin/install-info gmp = 4.2.4-6.fc11 libgmp.so.3()(64bit) libgmpxx.so.4()(64bit) libmp.so.3()(64bit) gmp-static-4.2.4-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm gmp-static = 4.2.4-6.fc11 gmp-static(x86-64) = 4.2.4-6.fc11 = gmp-devel = 4.2.4-6.fc11 * %check is present and all tests pass: All 9 tests passed All 10 tests passed All 56 tests passed All 11 tests passed All 26 tests passed All 7 tests passed All 3 tests passed All 14 tests passed All 3 tests passed * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig is called properly. unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. X README file is duplicated in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig, info installation) * code, not content. * headers are in the -devel package. * no pkgconfig files. * static libraries are in a separate -static package. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 22:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 18:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272226.n4RMQwsg031240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-27 18:26:56 EDT --- Just noticed this was still open. Did anything ever happen with upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed May 27 23:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 19:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905272348.n4RNmtb9012526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-05-27 19:48:54 EDT --- All of the issues have been addressed. The code has been relicensed, including all header files, to use GPLv2 (not +). I did not try to build in koji. It builds cleanly in mock using -r fedora-10-i386 Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-dsgw.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-dsgw-1.1.2-3.src.rpm Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 0eed1a7a66ce7d77895067e31e064445 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 e2ac8fa22c56754aef6e826a166e4ec75b67ab52 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 02:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 22:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497759] Review Request: funcshell - A shell interface to Func In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280217.n4S2HSWN012900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497759 --- Comment #8 from arthurguru 2009-05-27 22:17:26 EDT --- Hi Silas, Just did another informal review of funcshell using Koji for the builds. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380831 (i386, f-10) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380834 (ppc, f-10) Although it now builds on f-7 (thanks) its not worth pursuing as there is no python-cly for f-7 (in the standard repo). I plan to upgrade, but that will be some months away. In the meantime all the items that I could check (mainly clerical and builds) appear to be in order. Best regards, Arthur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 03:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 23:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280358.n4S3wRUb003562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-27 23:58:26 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sippy Short Description: B2BUA (back-to-back user agent) SIP call controlling component Owners: peter Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: peter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 04:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280401.n4S41YQS006852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #6 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-05-28 00:01:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) | I'm just curious - why it requires rxvt-unicode for both building and working? \-- The upstream README mentions the same as an optional package: "OPTIONAL PACKAGES: (Without these packages some features will not be avaliable)" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 04:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 00:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280416.n4S4Gwmx007106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) --- Comment #6 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-05-28 00:16:57 EDT --- Any new information on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485403] Review Request: ytnef - Yerase's TNEF Stream Reader. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280501.n4S51cNo018173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485403 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) | --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-05-28 01:01:37 EDT --- look again http://ispbrasil.com.br/ytnef/ytnef.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/ytnef/ytnef-2.6-4.fc11.src.rpm --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380867 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280508.n4S58Y0N017214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 01:08:33 EDT --- Yeah, I've noticed the same things. Please provide a spec that fixes those, then I'll run down the checklist. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] New: Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 Summary: Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: silas at sewell.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-line_profiler/python-line_profiler.spec SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-line_profiler-1.0-0.1.b2.fc10.src.rpm Description: line_profiler will profile the time individual lines of code take to execute. rpmlint [silas at silas rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280517.n4S5HVu4021302@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 01:17:30 EDT --- missing BuildRequires: gtk-doc here as well -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280524.n4S5OxXk022372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 01:24:58 EDT --- and intltool -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462176] Review Request: hybserv - Hybrid IRC Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280523.n4S5NJxT022184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462176 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rayvd at bludgeon.org Flag| |needinfo?(mmahut at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #1 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-05-28 01:23:18 EDT --- Hello, are you planning to complete this? I'd begun packaging hybserv as well and stumbled across this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280535.n4S5ZDsq025064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280535.n4S5ZExc025103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 05:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] New: Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Summary: Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: maxamillion at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables. It is a very efficient implementation of rainbow tables done by the inventors of the method. It comes with a Graphical User Interface and runs on multiple platforms. Features: * ? Runs on Windows, Linux/Unix, Mac OS X, ... * ? Cracks LM and NTLM hashes. * ? Free tables available for Windows XP and Vista. * ? Brute-force module for simple passwords. * ? Audit mode and CSV export. * ? Real-time graphs to analyze the passwords. * ? LiveCD available to simplify the cracking. * ? Loads hashes from encrypted SAM recovered from a Windows partition, Vista included. * ? Free and open source software (GPL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502987] New: Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502987 Summary: Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mvaliyav at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree.spec SRPM URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree-1.92-1.src.rpm Description: A console based file manager in the tradition of Xtree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:06:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:06:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] New: Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Summary: Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mvaliyav at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree.spec SRPM URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree-1.92-1.src.rpm Description: A console based file manager in the tradition of Xtree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280619.n4S6JfU9030058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-28 02:19:40 EDT --- *** Bug 502987 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502987] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280619.n4S6JfsR030033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502987 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |dan at danny.cz Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-05-28 02:19:40 EDT --- Submitted twice, closing the second copy. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 502986 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] New: Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Summary: Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-eradius.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-eradius-0-0.2.fc10.src.rpm Description: RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps. I contains both client an server functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] New: Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Summary: Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsyslog.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-0.3.svn10.fc10.src.rpm Description: Syslog client facility for Erlang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 06:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 02:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502991] New: Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 Summary: Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Erlsom is a set of functions to deal with XML Schema (XSDs) in Erlang. First you 'compile' the schema, and after that you can parse XML documents that conform to the schema. The result is a structure of Erlang records, based on the types that are defined by the Schema. Or, the other way around, a structure of records can be translated to an XML document. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280705.n4S75YXR008341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-05-28 03:05:33 EDT --- Thank you. Looking that Kevin is on holiday, so please add CVS. :-) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libirman Short Description: Library for IRMAN hardware Owners: ondrejj Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280718.n4S7I4UN007614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-28 03:18:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > Because the original copyright holder on sslogger.c is the Regents of the > University of California, this isn't a problem (because they have dropped the > advertising clause on all code they are the copyright holder for). Ah, thank you for clarifying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280723.n4S7Nqb7010893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:23:51 EDT --- R-BSgenome-1.12.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-BSgenome-1.12.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280723.n4S7NlQC010859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Bug 490722 depends on bug 490721, which changed state. Bug 490721 Summary: Review Request: R-Biostrings - String objects representing biological sequences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:23:46 EDT --- R-BSgenome-1.12.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-BSgenome-1.12.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:33:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:33:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280733.n4S7Xqmp012577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-28 03:33:51 EDT --- 1) Add dist tag as per given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Using_the_.25.7B.3Fdist.7D_Tag 2) As README clearly said license is as per given in COPYING so change it to GPLv2+ 3) %build should be make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" DESTDIR="%{_prefix}" 4)Use macros in %install section. Look https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros 5) Don't add user and group while using install commands for ytree and ytree.1 in %install 6) Remove %post 7) Change Source to Source0: http://www.han.de/~werner/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz 8) Change readline BR as BuildRequires: readline-devel >= 4.3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280757.n4S7vYRf016598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.8-3.b7.fc9 |0.0.8-3.b7.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:57:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:57:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495420] Review Request: rapid-photo-downloader - Images downloader for external devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280757.n4S7vUR6016559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495420 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:57:28 EDT --- rapid-photo-downloader-0.0.8-3.b7.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280757.n4S7vIxh016482@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:57:17 EDT --- towhee-6.2.3-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update towhee'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5540 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280757.n4S7vOfV016524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:57:22 EDT --- lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lxsession'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5541 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:57:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:57:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280757.n4S7v1pP014652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:57:00 EDT --- python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280757.n4S7v6xg014699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.13-1.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280759.n4S7xAA4015144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280759.n4S7x55F016997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:59:03 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280800.n4S80UZo017629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:00:29 EDT --- mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:01:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:01:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280801.n4S81S4F017865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:01:26 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:59:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:59:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280759.n4S7xsKX017129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 03:59:53 EDT --- python-repoze-who-1.0.13-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280803.n4S830SC017019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:02:59 EDT --- razertool-0.0.7-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280802.n4S823HD016608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:02:01 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 07:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 03:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468227] Review Request: python-repoze-who - An identification and authentication framework for WSGI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280759.n4S7xw76015619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468227 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.13-1.fc11 |1.0.13-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280804.n4S848mR017270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |4.106-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:02:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:02:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280802.n4S829rJ016723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280801.n4S81Xh2016403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280803.n4S83uMc017214@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |001.001-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280801.n4S81XVl016380@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:02:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:02:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280802.n4S82IvX016834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:02:16 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rabbitmq-server'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5563 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280807.n4S87Jh7020043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 04:07:18 EDT --- Once you have fixed these I'll do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280807.n4S87HUr020010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:07:16 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280807.n4S87TjR020087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:07:28 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492479] Review Request: razertool - Tool for controlling Razer Copperhead mice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280803.n4S835bs018504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.0.7-5.fc11 |0.0.7-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:03:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280803.n4S83pO0018892@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:03:49 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502307] Review Request:sil-charis-compact-fonts - A version of Charis SIL with tighter line spacing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280804.n4S843oJ018946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502307 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:04:02 EDT --- sil-charis-fonts-4.106-2.fc11, sil-charis-compact-fonts-4.106-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S863Le019785@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:06:02 EDT --- pdfchain-0.99-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfchain'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280805.n4S85BmC019527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280804.n4S84JXn019006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:04:18 EDT --- pdfchain-0.99-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pdfchain'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5576 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86YaY019889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 04:06:33 EDT --- A few initial notes: - You're mixing URL with Source0. Source0 should have the contents of the current URL, URL should be http://ophcrack.sourceforge.net/ instead. - I think you need BR: expat-devel. No need to specify the Requires: though, these will be picked up by RPM. - Remove the extra >>'s from the description. - Instead of Icon=ophcrack.png use Icon=ophcrack in the desktop file. - You are mixing %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, this is not allowed. Choose one and stick with it. - Drop %{_datadir}/applications as this is a standard system directory. Besides, now you're owning %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop twice as owning %{_datadir}/applications owns everything in it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86SQk018857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:06:27 EDT --- ykclient-2.2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86hBe018943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:06:42 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86BQa018769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:06:10 EDT --- task-1.7.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280808.n4S88Xux019489@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:08:32 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89T1P019649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:08:47 EDT --- zita-convolver-1.0.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280807.n4S87XUx019224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-2.fc11 |2.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280808.n4S88DG1019405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:08:11 EDT --- libgarmin-0-0.6.20090212svn.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498276] Review Request: ykclient - Yubikey management library and client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86Wli018902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498276 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2-1.fc11 |2.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280805.n4S85dMR018589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:05:38 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280805.n4S85hQU018624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3-3.fc11 |0.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280805.n4S856Of018387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:05:06 EDT --- python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89gOT019720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:09:41 EDT --- python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86GBf018814@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.7.0-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:06:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:06:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280806.n4S86mds018982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.34-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:07:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:07:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280807.n4S87M5w019181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:05:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:05:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280805.n4S85KBF018452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:05:19 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rabbitmq-server'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5581 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502117] Review Request: mod_log_post - Module for the Apache web server to log all HTTP POST messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280811.n4S8BNph021757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502117 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:11:22 EDT --- mod_log_post-0.1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280808.n4S88cDV020782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-2.fc10 |1.0.0-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499300] Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89Yv9020968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.0-2.fc9 |1.0.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:11:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:11:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280811.n4S8BWd0021799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:11:31 EDT --- python-repoze-who-testutil-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:08:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:08:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468631] Review Request: libgarmin - C library to parse and use Garmin image files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280808.n4S88Jk1020561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468631 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.6.20090212svn.fc9 |0-0.6.20090212svn.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280810.n4S8ANih021498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:10:22 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89XWv020934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 04:09:30 EDT --- 9) Use -p to conserve time stamps in install. 10) Don't use -s, stripping is done automatically by rpm (this is what creates the -debuginfo package). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:10:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280810.n4S8A2KA021338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|001.001-3.fc11 |001.001-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280807.n4S87eku020147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:07:39 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update rabbitmq-server'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5601 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:11:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:11:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280811.n4S8Bmnf021061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.7.0-2.fc10 |1.7.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:11:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:11:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501498] Review Request: task - an open source, command-line, TODO list manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280811.n4S8BiRW021024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501498 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:11:43 EDT --- task-1.7.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89wKW020200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:09:57 EDT --- woodardworks-laconic-fonts-001.001-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493479] Review Request: woodardworks-laconic-fonts - An artistic and minimal sans-serif font family In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280810.n4S8ARfO020584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493479 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|001.001-3.fc9 |001.001-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499483] Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280811.n4S8BbEj020985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-0.2.rc1.fc11 |1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280809.n4S89kdO019874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-0.1.b3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280814.n4S8EI4F021761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:14:17 EDT --- lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update lxsession'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5623 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280814.n4S8EN8N021802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:14:22 EDT --- towhee-6.2.3-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update towhee'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5624 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:16:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280816.n4S8Gilh023519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:16:43 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280814.n4S8ESUR022652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:14:27 EDT --- jack_capture-0.9.34-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280817.n4S8HGXj023637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:17:15 EDT --- jack-keyboard-2.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280815.n4S8F1uQ022796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:15:00 EDT --- spawn-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499743] Review Request: jack-keyboard - Virtual keyboard for JACK MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280817.n4S8HLqv023668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499743 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5-2.fc9 |2.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:14:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280814.n4S8EcnB022720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.34-1.fc11 |0.9.34-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280817.n4S8HXjv023730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:17:32 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:17:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:17:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280817.n4S8HcL0023786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-1.fc11 |0.6-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:16:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280816.n4S8GZWR023480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6-1.fc10 |0.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497705] Review Request: spawn - Simple tool to run several Linux command-lines in parallel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280815.n4S8F6WC023111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497705 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc9 |0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280816.n4S8G8gP023406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:16:06 EDT --- mod_selinux-2.2.1938-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280815.n4S8FPnS023235@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:15:24 EDT --- python-repoze-who-friendlyform-1.0-0.1.b3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:15:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280815.n4S8FnDI023322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3-3.fc10 |0.3-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:16:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499323] Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280816.n4S8GnDJ023025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.34-1.fc10 |0.9.34-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499749] Review Request: unoconv - Tool to convert between any document format supported by OpenOffice.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280815.n4S8Fh7u022689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499749 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:15:42 EDT --- unoconv-0.3-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478919] Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280816.n4S8GU6s022963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 04:16:29 EDT --- globus-xio-gsi-driver-0.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:15:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:15:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501566] Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280815.n4S8FUij022627@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-0.1.b3.fc11 |1.0-0.1.b3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501228] Review Request: mod_selinux - An apache module to launch web applications with restrictive privileges In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280816.n4S8GDbA022880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501228 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.1938-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 08:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 04:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280820.n4S8KMHP024055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 04:20:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Is this review stuck? I'm going to approve it in one week if nobody takes > over. No, it is not stuck, since no-one has even done the review yet! Taking over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 09:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280934.n4S9YlG7009212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #4 from Minto Joseph 2009-05-28 05:34:46 EDT --- Hello, Made changes. Please check. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree.spec http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree-1.92-2.fc11.src.rpm Regards Minto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 09:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 05:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905280958.n4S9wsKK015147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-28 05:58:52 EDT --- Package fails to build due to wrong/missing BuildRequires: 1) BuildRequires wrong: libxml++ should be libxml++-devel 2) BuildRequires missing: zfstream-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:03:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:03:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281003.n4SA3FUW016351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 06:03:13 EDT --- - You don't need DESTDIR="%{_prefix}" in the build phase. - Remove the commented #make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT line. - You can drop mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man1 if you add the -D flag to install (you have to use install -m755 -D -p ytree $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_bindir}/ytree though). - Don't tab the buildroot line, if you're not tabbing the other ones either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] New: Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Summary: Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gnaughty-1.2.0/gnaughty.spec SRPM URL: http://cassmodiah.fedorapeople.org/gnaughty-1.2.0/gnaughty-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Application to download automatically adult sex content, i.e. porn movies and pictures, from a known internet porn directory. Features: * No spyware, no adware * Free software, provided under the GPL license * Wide variaty of porn categories * Fast parallel downloads * Proxy support * Many more... RPMLINT: gnaughty.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/gnaughty.schemas A non-executable file in your package is being installed in /etc, but is not a configuration file. All non-executable files in /etc should be configuration files. Mark the file as %config in the spec file. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281011.n4SAB4kg018577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 06:11:03 EDT --- - I don't think the man page should be listed as %doc. ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - See comments above. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - License of ytree is GPL+, but the tarball also contains a couple of files ({tilde,xmalloc}.{c,h}) from GNU readline that are licensed GPLv2+, thus license is GPLv2+. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281019.n4SAJYZm020674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281026.n4SAQGfW022454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cheekyboinc at foresightlinux. | |org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cheekyboinc at foresightlinux. | |org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281034.n4SAYAOL024392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-28 06:34:09 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503019] New: Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - a simple application launcher for Plasma Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - a simple application launcher for Plasma https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503019 Summary: Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - a simple application launcher for Plasma Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: floriansievert at phobeus.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.floriansievert.de/linux/repo/f11/stable/specs/kde-plasma-daisy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.floriansievert.de/linux/repo/f11/stable/srpms/kde-plasma-daisy-0.0.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Daisy is a simple application launcher for Plasma. It comes by default by a fancy circle appearance and might be interesting for people needing a simple and nice looking way to run their default applications. It is configurable and might be used as media controller for amarok as well. For getting an first impression on the appearance you might want to visit: http://kde-look.org/content/show.php/Daisy?content=102077 This is my first package for fedora and I need someone to sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] New: Review Request: pony - a simple image manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pony - a simple image manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Summary: Review Request: pony - a simple image manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pony.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pony-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Pony is a simple KDE based image manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281052.n4SAqhxL029087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #7 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-05-28 06:52:41 EDT --- I tried sending an e-mail to the author, but the gmail.cz address doesn't seem to exist. I got a mail daemon error. Also, in lib/terminal.tcl and lib/editor.tcl, the AUTHOR is invoking urxvt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 10:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 06:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281059.n4SAxWYD031110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-28 06:59:31 EDT --- The description seems bad to me: * No spyware, no adware Since when is this a feature? * Free software, provided under the GPL license Redundant to the License field * Many more... Does not look like a feature either :) The description should preferably not be a formatted text, it won't look good in a GUI frontend. Please try to replace the list with paragraph of sentences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281103.n4SB350N032295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281104.n4SB4f6l000660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #7 from Minto Joseph 2009-05-28 07:04:39 EDT --- Hello, Made changes. Please check. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree.spec http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ytree-1.92-3.fc11.src.rpm Regards Minto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281113.n4SBDMpq004520@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #51 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-28 07:13:17 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-0.4.rc4.fc11.src.rpm -- * Thu May 28 2009 Michal Nowak 3.3-0.4.rc4 - 3.3-rc4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281140.n4SBefrA010725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-28 07:40:40 EDT --- ? Rpmlint must be run on every package. pony.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/pony/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. There exist some sw but nothing exactly named pony: http://sourceforge.net/search/?type_of_search=soft&words=pony OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281149.n4SBn3Cl013614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-28 07:49:01 EDT --- I know the featurelist is bad. the list shows what I expect of a application in fedora. the description itself looks very short to me, but I'm sure there are packages with shorter descriptions. I will remove the list! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281153.n4SBrEvr013837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-28 07:53:13 EDT --- Wow, it's cool. Please add your source to correct place, which would be somewhere at https://fedorahosted.org/releases/... I'm unsure about the rest of path but the pros are that others can download from here by wget. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 11:58:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 07:58:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281158.n4SBwtDT015352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-28 07:58:54 EDT --- Review: OK; rpmlint shows a number of warnings. But the packager already explained them and I agree that they are not a problem. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: License is included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: Script for fetching sources is included. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: BuildRequires are good OK: No duplicate entries in %files listings. OK: Permissions on files are good OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadoc are in separate package. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281212.n4SCCaMY019188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com Summary|Review Request: fb-contrib |Review Request: |- Extra findbugs detectors |findbugs-contrib - Extra | |findbugs detectors Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-28 08:12:35 EDT --- I'm taking this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:12:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:12:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] New: Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Summary: Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/easystroke.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/easystroke-0.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Easystroke is a gesture-recognition application for X11. Gestures or strokes are movements that you make with you mouse (or your pen, finger etc.) while holding down a specific mouse button. Easystroke will execute certain actions if it recognizes the stroke; currently easystroke can emulate key presses, execute shell commands, hold down modifiers and emulate a scroll wheel. rpmlint is not clean for debug package: easystroke-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package I checked if %{optflags} passing to compiler, and they pass (see build.log at Koji), but I'm still getting this error. Koji builds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1381241 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1381227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281227.n4SCR4Qk023974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 08:27:02 EDT --- Yes, now it looks very clean. The package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281231.n4SCVdtm025220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 --- Comment #3 from Kushal Das 2009-05-28 08:31:38 EDT --- Sorry for that stupid mistake on source url. Fixed. Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pony.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pony-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281230.n4SCU7aW024878@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-28 08:30:06 EDT --- What do you think about making a subpackage eclipse-findbugs-contrib built by this srpm? It will just need to require eclipse-findbugs and make a symlink of fb-contrib.jar in the %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/findbugs/plugins/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.plugin.eclipse_*/plugin folder. This will really ease the adoption of the new checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281234.n4SCYDEV025649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-28 08:34:11 EDT --- I think you should also remove the word "porn" from the summary. This is "adult content". Are you sure, you want to maintain this piece of software? I'm afraid you'll get lots of bugs reports for broken ULRs, mabye even people kidding and filing RFEs for "hands-free support". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281236.n4SCaO4S025066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-28 08:36:23 EDT --- No problem, but what about the rpmlint? pony.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/pony/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281244.n4SCiB4Z027891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 --- Comment #5 from Kushal Das 2009-05-28 08:44:10 EDT --- /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common comes from KDE itself (I guess kdelibs or something). Last night from #fedora-kde i learnt: This is a bug in the KDE CMake stuff. All the KDE packages have broken symlinks like that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281258.n4SCwmgh030884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-05-28 08:58:47 EDT --- Ok, this explanation is enough. ACCEPTED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 12:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 08:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281259.n4SCxTlF031851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-28 08:59:28 EDT --- I'm sure that proper versioning scheme is Version: 0.9.1 Release: 0.1.pre_rev730%{?dist} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281301.n4SD1tqH032258@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-05-28 09:01:54 EDT --- And why not to keep sK1 as Name of the package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281303.n4SD3mA2032683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #4 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-28 09:03:47 EDT --- In reply to comment #3) > I think you should also remove the word "porn" from the summary. This is "adult > content". K, and in desktopfile of course, too... > Are you sure, you want to maintain this piece of software? Not really, but If this will raise to an overchallenge i will give it away.. I'm sure it finds a new maintainer in 15min or less. :-p -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:03:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281303.n4SD3iFM000737@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-28 09:03:41 EDT --- Ok, thanks, fixed & updated: SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-7.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1381322 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281303.n4SD30bd000539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Kushal Das 2009-05-28 09:02:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pony Short Description: Pony is a simple image manager Owners: kushal Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:03:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281303.n4SD3Hfa000606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-28 09:03:16 EDT --- Several notes: ! Mock fails: error: File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/dynamic-wallpaper-0.3-1.fc11.x86_64/usr/bin/motor.py? Try change to: %exclude %{_bindir}/motor.pyc - Add this line at %prep to preserve time stamps: sed -i 's|install |install -p |' Makefile - The new version is on upstream, please update. - If not necessary, delete commented make line from %build ? If you sponsored packager, I can make review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503019] Review Request: kde-plasma-daisy - a simple application launcher for Plasma In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281306.n4SD6pNW001356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503019 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281306.n4SD6HKO001237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-28 09:06:13 EDT --- == Review == Good: - rpmlint checks return: wordnet.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libWN.so.3.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 [SAFE TO IGNORE] - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (MIT) OK, text in %doc (source code does not include licensing, just blanket attribution, please ask upstream to include per file licensing) - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (aeb7887cb4935756cf77deb1ea86973dff0e32fb) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file (tk application is just wish shell, does not meet requirements for desktop file inclusion) - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED. Pick up the steps here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored Also, please don't forget about wmfire (478744)! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:08:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:08:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281308.n4SD8BT8002217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-05-28 09:08:09 EDT --- I'm assuming that this is legally blocked because it is solely designed to download internet pornography, not because it includes any in the package, correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281331.n4SDV38A007977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 09:31:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345761) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345761) new spec file Here is a new spec file that I am going to base my review on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281329.n4SDThGN007388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #10 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-05-28 09:29:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Is this review stuck? I'm going to approve it in one week if nobody takes > > over. > > No, it is not stuck, since no-one has even done the review yet! Well, Nils Philippsen did an initial review and the packager responded to it. > Taking over. Sure, go on. This review has been stuck for way too long. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281334.n4SDYffT007936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 09:34:41 EDT --- I'll make a patch for these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281333.n4SDXY74007826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 09:33:33 EDT --- With that spec file, packages build fine in mock, and rpmlint reports: [mclasen at planemask rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281331.n4SDV8w3007407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zarko.pintar at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-28 09:31:07 EDT --- Note about ffmpeg: If KRadio4 can works nice without ffmpeg and lame than you can put it on Fedora, but if this application is useless (or mostly useless) without these dependencies, than put it on RPM Fusion! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:34:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:34:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281334.n4SDYrk0008533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #9 from Minto Joseph 2009-05-28 09:34:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ytree Short Description: A filemanager similar to XTree Owners: mintojoseph Branches: F-11 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281334.n4SDYDgB008456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 09:34:10 EDT --- - Instead of make clean'ing in between building the different versions, I'd suggest using off-root builds. ** rpmlint output: xsane.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsane-0.996/xsane.CHANGES xsane.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsane-0.996/xsane.PROBLEMS xsane.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsane-0.996/xsane.INSTALL xsane-gimp.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. - You need to convert these to UTF-8 in the setup phase: for doc in xsane.{CHANGES,PROBLEMS,INSTALL}; do iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t utf8 $doc -o $doc.new && \ touch -r $doc $doc.new && \ mv $doc.new $doc done MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - You don't need BR: sed, it is in the standard buildroot. - No need to define desktop_vendor as it is only used in two places and is not even supposed to be changed. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - Package must not own %dir %{_datadir}/applications which is a standard system directory. - gimp package must Requires: gimp for dir ownership and not own %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp/plugins.d MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK - %{_datadir}/sane, %{_datadir}/sane/xsane and %{_datadir}/sane/xsane/xsane-eula.txt are owned by both xsane and xsane-gimp. Is there a good reason for this? If xsane-gimp needs those files, it'd be wiser to let xsane own them and put a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to xsane-gimp. MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root). MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Remove unneeded files from doc (rm in setup or install phase): xsane.RPM, xsane.conf, xsane.spec*, xsane.INSTALL, xsane.REMOVE MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281341.n4SDfvBb010365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #3 from Adam Miller 2009-05-28 09:41:56 EDT --- I fixed the URL/Source0 mishap, that one was a horrible oversight by myself. Don't need expat-devel, I built the SRPM in mock to verify and I'd rather leave the Requires for personal sanity as opposed to relying on the auto-fu but if there is a guideline saying otherwise I will happily oblige. Got rid of the extra >>'s Changed the Icon listing This was an oversight/laziness as a side effect of fedora vim auto generating a template for me with $RPM_BUILD_ROOT, it has been fixed. Dropped the %{_datadir}/applications listing in %files. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.2.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281343.n4SDhERJ009865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 09:43:13 EDT --- No F10?! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281347.n4SDl5pb011888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #11 from Minto Joseph 2009-05-28 09:47:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ytree Short Description: A filemanager similar to XTree Owners: mintojoseph Branches: F-10,F-11 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281347.n4SDlH2S011941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #6 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-28 09:47:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Note about ffmpeg: > > If KRadio4 can works nice without ffmpeg and lame than you can put it on > Fedora, but if this application is useless (or mostly useless) without these > dependencies, than put it on RPM Fusion! It works perfectly without ffmpeg, which is only needed for Internet radio. For using only an FM/TV capture card, there is no need of ffmpeg/libmms, and it will work the same way as gnomeradio. The current version supports pulseaudio: SRPM URL: http://dl.atrpms.net/src/f10-i386/atrpms/stable/kradio4-4.0.0-0.9.r883.20090514.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:53:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:53:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281353.n4SDraZ4012515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #7 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-28 09:53:35 EDT --- Yes, but internet radio is something very useful and I do not know how is smart build this application without internet radio support! Personally, I know more people who use internet radio from those who use FM capture cards... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281358.n4SDwOsV013976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #8 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-28 09:58:23 EDT --- BTW, are you sponsored packager? If you are, than I can do review ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281358.n4SDwC8G013914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 09:58:11 EDT --- - Don't use macros in the URL. This makes copy-paste impossible from the spec file. (In reply to comment #3) > Don't need expat-devel, I built the SRPM in mock to verify and I'd rather leave > the Requires for personal sanity as opposed to relying on the auto-fu but if > there is a guideline saying otherwise I will happily oblige. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires "Packages must not contain explicit Requires on libraries except when absolutely necessary. When explicit library Requires are necessary, there should be a spec file comment justifying it." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281359.n4SDxpcJ014707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #6 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-28 09:59:50 EDT --- correct -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:01:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:01:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281401.n4SE1hks015433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 10:01:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Created an attachment (id=345764) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345764) [details] > Patch against spec file in CVS This should fix every issue in the review. I tried the off-root build, however it didn't work as nicely as it should. Maybe it's easier and nicer to keep the build the way it is now. I did add the SMP flags to the build, though. Once you have committed the patch to CVS and built it in rawhide, I can check that everything is OK and approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 13:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 09:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281359.n4SDxqmC014358@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 09:59:51 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345764) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345764) Patch against spec file in CVS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:03:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281403.n4SE33Dj015522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-28 10:03:02 EDT --- Fedora review RasmusDSP-0.1-1.20090321cvs.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-28 $ rpmlint *.rpm RasmusDSP.spec RasmusDSP-editor.x86_64: W: no-documentation 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * OK ? needs attention * rpmlint output is OK * package is named according to the guidelines * spec file is named after the package * package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (BSD) * package license matches license statements in the sources * no license file present in sources * spec file is written in legible English * sources matches upstream * package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ? jack-audio-connection-kit-devel - is it needed as a BuildRequires? "grep -lr jack RasmusDSP" does not return any matches * package owns the directories it creates * no duplicate files * permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * spec file uses macros consistently * contains code, not content * subpackages requires main with fully qualified version * desktop files are installed using desktop-file-install * %install clears buildroot * installed filenames are UTF-8 * icon cache handling according to (draft) guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:04:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:04:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281404.n4SE4rJ1016208@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #9 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-28 10:04:52 EDT --- Yes I am. Please, go ahead .... I also spent days with the developer for removing bugs and adding pulseaudio support. It would be nice if you had a capture card to test all the aspects of the software, which is really nice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281410.n4SEAPS0017986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-28 10:10:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Yes, but internet radio is something very useful and I do not know how is smart > build this application without internet radio support! > > Personally, I know more people who use internet radio from those who use FM > capture cards... I am one of those people.... I use kradio4 in several computers without a capture card. But the Internet radio is just a plugin, which could go in a separate package kradio4-nonfree something, I guess. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:12:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:12:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281412.n4SECL2o018269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 10:12:21 EDT --- doing the checklist: rpmlint: ok, see above package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec legible: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locales: n/a shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: -devel needs to depend on gtk-doc for /usr/share/gtk-doc duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: ok doc subpackage: ok doc content: ok headers: ok static libs: n/a pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: -devel must not include /usr/share/gtk-doc/html, it should just include /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eggdbus %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281411.n4SEBSS3018251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #7 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-05-28 10:11:26 EDT --- If you really want to maintain this software, seriously, and fix the description "problems"...then i will give you that review. :) -> Blocks: FE-Legal <- *sigh* :) ...you know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281414.n4SEEhcD018530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 10:14:42 EDT --- Also, I just noticed that the package installs two documentation trees: /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/eggdbus /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/tests the second name looks awfully general. That should probably be fixed, or that part of the docs nuked. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281416.n4SEG8sM019385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #11 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-28 10:16:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > But the Internet radio is just a plugin, which could go in > a separate package kradio4-nonfree something, I guess. That is good. Could you make this separate package in the near future? I will today, tomorrow take a look of spec, OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281420.n4SEKSEH020520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #12 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-28 10:20:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > > > But the Internet radio is just a plugin, which could go in > > a separate package kradio4-nonfree something, I guess. > > > That is good. Could you make this separate package in the near future? Sure. > > I will today, tomorrow take a look of spec, OK? Thanks. Take your time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281426.n4SEQE1D022005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 10:26:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345768) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345768) new spec file This spec file addresses the remaining concerns. If you are ok with the changes made, this can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281430.n4SEUVbt023276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #8 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-28 10:30:29 EDT --- I volunteer to conduct some functional testing then :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:35:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:35:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281435.n4SEZldH025148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |limb at jcomserv.net --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-28 10:35:45 EDT --- To clarify, the nonfree plugin will be going to rpmfusion, correct? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281444.n4SEi66h027473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #7 from Jerry James 2009-05-28 10:44:04 EDT --- Ah, good idea. I'll roll a new SRPM later today to include that. Thanks for the suggestion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:41:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:41:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281441.n4SEfvFJ027042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #5 from Adam Miller 2009-05-28 10:41:56 EDT --- Got rid of the macro in the URL Removed the Requires Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281447.n4SElewd028262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #14 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-28 10:47:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > To clarify, the nonfree plugin will be going to rpmfusion, correct? Of course. I know it cannot be here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281452.n4SEq3R1030404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla 2009-05-28 10:52:02 EDT --- I figured as much, just making sure all the Rs are dotted and the Ms are crossed. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 14:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 10:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281452.n4SEq4gI030430@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 10:52:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345772) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345772) spec that builds Here is a spec file that has the missing BRs added. I'm going to base my review on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 15:15:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 11:15:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281515.n4SFFuqx005482@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 11:15:55 EDT --- [mclasen at planemask rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm polkit.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified polkit.src: W: no-url-tag polkit.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified polkit.x86_64: W: no-url-tag polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/polkit-1 polkit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/polkit-1 0700 polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/polkit-1/nullbackend.conf.d/50-nullbackend.conf polkit.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/libexec/polkit-agent-helper-1 root 04755 polkit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/polkit-agent-helper-1 04755 polkit.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/pkexec root 04755 polkit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pkexec 04755 polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.conf polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/50-localauthority.conf polkit-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag polkit-devel.x86_64: W: no-url-tag polkit-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation polkit-docs.noarch: E: devel-dependency polkit-devel polkit-docs.noarch: W: no-url-tag 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 12 warnings. The no-url and non-standard-group warnings should be easy enough to fix. The non-conffile-in-etc ones are probably ignorable. The setuid and executable-perm ones should perhaps get a comment in the %files section, explaining why things are the way they are Not sure what the devel-dependency error is about, doesn't make sense to me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:02:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:02:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281602.n4SG2Cik018741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-28 12:02:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281602.n4SG2tZE018893@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-28 12:02:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281604.n4SG4FFv019145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-28 12:04:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:03:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:03:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281603.n4SG3fAo018082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-05-28 12:03:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Issues: > - Package does not match the naming guidelines, Correct is version 0.5.1 > release 1%{?dist} see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_packages Sorry i dont understand this one; i read the guidelines and it seems to be correct to version the package 0.5.1c, as it is the third bugfix release under version 0.5.1 > > - change License tag to GPLv2+, take a look at the source > > - You are not owning %{buildroot}/etc/alsa.d, and AFAIK that dir is not created > by another package ether > > - this wont work %dir %{_datadir}/soundfonts/*.bnk > > - add INSTALL ="install -p" to make install to preserve timestamps of the > soundbank files > > - I suggest to use install rather then cp so you can always be sure permissions > are correct. ok rpmlint is now silent; latest files here: http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/awesfx/awesfx.spec http://guidograzioli.fedorapeople.org/packages/awesfx/awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc9.src.rpm cheers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281608.n4SG8OQx020372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 12:08:23 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345787) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345787) more fixes This spec file has some more fixes, like directory ownership, etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:09:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:09:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281609.n4SG9hCL019837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 12:09:42 EDT --- rpmlint output based on this spec file: [mclasen at planemask rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/pam.d/polkit-1 polkit.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/polkit-1 0700 polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/polkit-1/nullbackend.conf.d/50-nullbackend.conf polkit.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/libexec/polkit-agent-helper-1 root 04755 polkit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/libexec/polkit-agent-helper-1 04755 polkit.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/bin/pkexec root 04755 polkit.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/pkexec 04755 polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.conf polkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/polkit-1/localauthority.conf.d/50-localauthority.conf polkit-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation polkit-docs.noarch: E: devel-dependency polkit-devel 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 5 warnings. I see that you already had the comment about permissions, so thats good -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281626.n4SGQmHb024723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #52 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-05-28 12:26:46 EDT --- Is anyone providing a cairo package prebuilt with the xcb backend? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:26:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:26:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281626.n4SGQ3Hj024549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 12:26:02 EDT --- checklist: rpmlint: see above package name: follows tarball name, ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec legible: ok upstream sources: ok buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locales: ok shared libs: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: needs to own /usr/lib64/polkit-1/ and the backends/ subdir might want to add an explicit dbus dep for /usr/share/dbus-1/ (even though ConsoleKit pulls it in) duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: ok large docs: ok %doc content: ok headers: ok static libs: n/a pc files: ok shared libs: ok devel deps: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: must run rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT utf8 filenames: ok I wonder why pkexec is in the main package, but the pkexec policy is in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:33:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:33:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281633.n4SGXfUH026620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 12:33:40 EDT --- libirman-0.4.5-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libirman-0.4.5-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281633.n4SGX2Ss026484@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 12:33:01 EDT --- libirman-0.4.5-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libirman-0.4.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281639.n4SGdwuM028228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 12:39:57 EDT --- Ugh, what a broken build system. - You need BuildRequires: qwt-devel to get graph rendering (enabled by default). Then you need to %configure --with-libqwt=%{_libdir} to get configure to realize qwt is installed (at least on x86_64). Doesn't hurt having the specification, though. - Opt flags are not respected all the way. You need to get the build process to use the RPM optimization flags also in the beginning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:43:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:43:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281643.n4SGhFgo029619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-28 12:43:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Mamoru Tasaka > > If patch -p0 -b --suffix .warning < %{SOURCE1} is replaced by %patch1 -p0 -b > .warning > , koji will appear errors. I said so and I did not say that "cd bin/" can be dropped .... And still directory ownership issue is not addressed correctly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281652.n4SGqQYG031959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #53 from Michal Nowak 2009-05-28 12:52:25 EDT --- I don't think so. It's quite easy to DIY. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281653.n4SGrwAO032565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #23 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-28 12:53:55 EDT --- To Ed: Now I will wait for you to update your srpm. Also would you address what Gratien pointed out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 16:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281654.n4SGsSbV032383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #28 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-28 12:54:27 EDT --- Building lirc w/irman support in rawhide now. Not sure if I need to wait a bit before I can do F10/F11 builds... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:02:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:02:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281702.n4SH2PZE002791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #29 from Jarod Wilson 2009-05-28 13:02:24 EDT --- Ugh. Rawhide build failed, can't find libirman-devel yet for some reason. I'll just wait a bit to build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281704.n4SH40oc002605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #8 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-28 13:03:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > I wonder why pkexec is in the main package, but the pkexec policy is in -devel No, the pkexec policy is in the main package as org.freedesktop.policykit.exec the file you are referring to is for the org.freedesktop.policykit.example.pkexec.run-frobnicate action which is used by /usr/bin/pk-example-frobnicate (also in the -devel package). E.g. the example is basically that you can do $ pkexec pk-example-frobnicate and then get a dialog like this http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/pk-example-frobnicate.png instead of e.g. this http://people.freedesktop.org/~david/pkexec-3.png -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281716.n4SHGbh0007194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-28 13:16:36 EDT --- For rawhide, you just have to wait for a newrepo task to complete. For the release branches, you need to wait until either the next updates push or request from releng that the package you need be tagged into the buildroot. Honestly I don't know if or how the not-yet-released status of F11 alters that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281721.n4SHLO5c008511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 13:21:24 EDT --- python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281721.n4SHLIcZ008476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 13:21:16 EDT --- python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281738.n4SHcWod012534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-28 13:38:30 EDT --- Also ----------------------------------------------------- mv %{_bindir}/perltetris.pl %{_bindir}/perlfangkuang.pl ----------------------------------------------------- this is not right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503075] New: Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503075 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ku.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-ku-0.21-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kurdish hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 17:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281754.n4SHso3I018385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-28 13:54:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Sorry i dont understand this one; i read the guidelines and it seems to be > correct to version the package 0.5.1c, as it is the third bugfix release under > version 0.5.1 I was under the impression that characters were not allowed in releases and are always moved to the release field. But you are correct, the wiki does not say so explicitly. If you like you can stick with 0.5.1c-1%{?dist}, but I'd prefer 0.5.1-1%{?dist}.c Let's see what we have now: OK - License tag matches actual license (GPLv2+) OK - %files section fixed: package owns %{_sysconfdir}/alsa.d and %{_datadir}/soundfonts/ OK - Time stamps preserved during install OK - Permissions of files are correct. The package awesfx-0.5.1c-2.fc9.src.rpm is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 18:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 14:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281812.n4SICpYW023643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345772|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #345787|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #9 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 14:12:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345810) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345810) fixed spec This spec file fixes the points that came up while running through the checklist. If you are fine with these changes, this can be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 19:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281910.n4SJA74Q003448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 15:10:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345821) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345821) add build requires This spec adds enough build requires to make the package build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 19:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281914.n4SJEvto004321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 15:14:56 EDT --- rpmlint output [mclasen at planemask rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm polkit-gnome.src: W: non-standard-group Unspecified polkit-gnome.src: W: no-url-tag polkit-gnome.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Unspecified polkit-gnome.x86_64: W: no-url-tag polkit-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation polkit-gnome-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-url-tag 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 19:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 15:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905281942.n4SJgoBU011935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345821|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 15:42:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345829) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345829) pendantic fixes This spec file has some more pedantic fixes. With this, rpmlint reports: 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Basing the review on this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:09:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:09:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282009.n4SK98gw017357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #7 from Adam Miller 2009-05-28 16:09:07 EDT --- I have been in contact with upstream ever since I decided to package this and when speaking with one of the developers today I was informed that they are going to release a new version tomorrow and they will also be altering a few things in their make file that will accommodate for the location of the qwt header files in Fedora (an issue I was having). I will put together a new package tomorrow with the new version and update the review request then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282009.n4SK9etL017423@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 16:09:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Sorry i dont understand this one; i read the guidelines and it seems to be > > correct to version the package 0.5.1c, as it is the third bugfix release under > > version 0.5.1 > > I was under the impression that characters were not allowed in releases and are > always moved to the release field. But you are correct, the wiki does not say > so explicitly. If you like you can stick with 0.5.1c-1%{?dist}, but I'd prefer > 0.5.1-1%{?dist}.c Guido's numbering is correct, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Post-Release_package "Properly ordered simple versions. These are usually due to quick bugfix releases, such as openssl-0.9.6b or gkrellm-2.1.7a. As new versions come out, the non-numeric tag is properly incremented (e.g. openssl-0.9.6c) or the numeric version is increased and the non-numeric tag is dropped (openssl-0.9.7). In this case, the non-numeric characters are permitted in the Version: field. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282008.n4SK8arG016941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-28 16:08:35 EDT --- checklist rpmlint: see above package name: matches tarball name, ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok, but should probably updated to be straight LGPL, since the daemon etc are gone spec file language: ok spec file legible: ok upstream sources: missing buildable: ok excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locales: ok shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok permissions: ok %clean: ok macro use: ok content: ok large docs: n/a %doc content: ok header files: n/a static libs: n/a pc files: n/a shared libs: n/a devel deps: ok gui apps: ok file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Should drop the --vendor gnome in the desktop-file-install call -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282012.n4SKCitU018613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-28 16:12:43 EDT --- Okay, please ask them to make also sure that the CFLAGS set in configure phase are used everywhere. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:19:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:19:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282019.n4SKJbIn019834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-28 16:19:36 EDT --- I wouldn't say this one or that one is correct, both are allowed as per guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:33:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:33:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282033.n4SKXxOA023149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-28 16:33:58 EDT --- Further update. Now the package uses the boost build system to build the dynamic libraries as well. As a side effect, this fixes building DLLs for the above mentioned DLLs. Spec URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost.spec SRPM URL: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:42:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:42:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282042.n4SKgXI8023756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-28 16:42:30 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openttd-opengfx Short Description: OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD Owners: heffer Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 20:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 16:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282048.n4SKmgJx025064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #18 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-28 16:48:40 EDT --- I hope this fixes all the problems you pointed out: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd.spec http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-0.7.1-0.2.rc2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 21:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282100.n4SL06To028254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cassmodiah at fedoraproject.or | |g Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #59 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-28 16:59:53 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tor New Branches: EL-5 Owners: ensc cassmodiah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 21:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282103.n4SL3mUQ029090@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #8 from Jerry James 2009-05-28 17:03:47 EDT --- New URLs: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-contrib/findbugs-contrib.spec http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/findbugs-contrib/findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Now that I've done this, though, I wonder about that eclipse-findbugs-contrib subpackage. Would it be better to use an RPM trigger to create and destroy the symbolic link? That way, we wouldn't need an entire package just to contain one symbolic link, and we could gain independence from the version number on the eclipse-findbugs package. What do you think? (Possible problem: I'm not sure I can easily determine the directory where the symbolic link should be created in a trigger.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 21:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282103.n4SL3Gdi028535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 Jeff Sheltren changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sheltren at fedoraproject.org Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Jeff Sheltren 2009-05-28 17:03:12 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libextractor New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 Owners: sheltren -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 21:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282144.n4SLixCX005029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Ronny Fischer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ronny.fischer at taunusstein.n | |et --- Comment #9 from Ronny Fischer 2009-05-28 17:44:58 EDT --- I think this package shouldn't make it into Fedora. Not because it's an application only for adults but because of legal things. If the package gets into the official fedora repo, the distro will get some problems to be distributed with linux magazines. It would be no more just informational software since it would be easily possible for underaged users to get adult contents from the web. Besides that it isn't guaranteed that every content downloaded is from legal sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 21:57:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282157.n4SLvuTx006468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-28 17:57:55 EDT --- i added a FE-LEGAL blocker... The legal-team knows best! We will see... and if it's a no-go so there is still rpmfusion :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 22:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282214.n4SMEtLW009134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 18:14:55 EDT --- mulk-0.4.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mulk-0.4.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 22:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282215.n4SMF0aO010030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 18:14:59 EDT --- mulk-0.4.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mulk-0.4.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 22:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282214.n4SMEpmg009989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-28 18:14:50 EDT --- mulk-0.4.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mulk-0.4.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 22:19:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:19:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282219.n4SMJqa3009970@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #19 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-28 18:19:51 EDT --- Your icon-cache scriptlets are not up-to-date. Check the latest version at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 22:27:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:27:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282227.n4SMRmM7012025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Ant Bryan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 22:51:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 18:51:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282251.n4SMpKr6016496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Greg Adair changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adairgj at lilly.com --- Comment #3 from Greg Adair 2009-05-28 18:51:19 EDT --- I just compiled this today and tested. It is very cool! The only issue I've found so far is that using the --html option described in the man page causes a segmentation fault. This option is something we'd like to use so that we can keep a historical record. I've emailed the author to see if this is a known issue or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 23:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282320.n4SNKrFo020602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #60 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-28 19:20:50 EDT --- I found an ack from Enrico on IRC; I include it below: [15:31] ensc you recieved my mail? [15:33] ensc about tor [15:35] cassmodiah: no, did not saw such a mail [15:35] :-( [15:36] ensc http://fpaste.org/paste/13205 [15:39] cassmodiah: ah... no, I do not plan to do EPEL packaging. "Working" with CVS SCM takes too much time... the three FEdora branches are enough and I do not want two additional ones. [15:39] :-p [15:40] you need a co? for epel? I'm just a packager in training, but cwickert and rsc always help me out if i have a problem :-) [15:43] ensc thx. can i have the el5? [15:47] cassmodiah: yes; but you will have to do the necessary steps to add it to epel. I will approve you then (when required) [15:48] ensc i thought i create a cvs request for el5 with me as co :-p [15:50] cassmodiah: sorry; I do not have time for these steps [15:51] cassmodiah: you don't need any approval from the Fedora maintainer for EPEL branching [15:53] rsc i know, but i think i have to bring the respect to the maintainer and ask him/her first [15:54] cassmodiah: that's okay and good. I just wanted to note that. However, I see no indication that Enrico wishes to have anything to do with this package; the above would seem to indicate the contrary. So I won't branch with him as the owner without an explicit ack. Please reset fedora-cvs to '?' if that ack is received or if another CVS request is made without Enrico as an owner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 23:34:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:34:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282334.n4SNY8q6022321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org --- Comment #24 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-28 19:34:06 EDT --- rpmlint complains on the absence of documentation for the non -devel package. I would alter the %file section as per following: %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %{_libdir}/*.so.* %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt It effectively duplicates the README.txt and LICENSE.txt files, but I think it is normal to repeat both of those on the two generated packages. The guideline (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplicate_Files) may not be clear enough on that part. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 23:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282344.n4SNigZ7024691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 --- Comment #61 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-28 19:44:41 EDT --- Sorry, please correct my above comment as "I see no indication that Enrico wishes to have anything to do with an EPEL branch of this package". Obviously he still maintains the package in the regular Fedora branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu May 28 23:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 19:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905282342.n4SNg7n9024455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #2 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-05-28 19:42:05 EDT --- I haven't this problem with mock, what's your fedora's version ? mock works fine in my F10. I've put 2 %exclude line to fix the problem. new links : SPEC : http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper.spec SRPM : http://tmp.sereinity.homelinux.org/rpm/dynamic-wallpaper-0.3.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 00:24:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 20:24:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290024.n4T0OVEb031838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-28 20:24:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > In reply to comment #3) > > This is "adult content". > K, and in desktopfile of course, too... Of course, because nether "p0rn" nor "adult content" are categories in freedesktop specs, see http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 01:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290127.n4T1REOg010346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-28 21:27:12 EDT --- So is someone going to ask about it on the plexus mailing-lists? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 01:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290123.n4T1N42p009563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? Bug 499975 depends on bug 499323, which changed state. Bug 499323 Summary: Review Request: jack_capture - Record sound files with JACK https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499323 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-28 21:23:03 EDT --- Thank you Igor, for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: guitarix Short Description: Mono amplifier to JACK Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 01:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290125.n4T1P8uD011113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-28 21:25:07 EDT --- Thank you very much! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tritonus Short Description: Java Sound API Implementation Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 01:38:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 21:38:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290138.n4T1cYbp013266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-28 21:38:33 EDT --- I poked around http://jira.codehaus.org a little but was not smart enough to work out where this should be filed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 02:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290200.n4T20u8A019486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-28 22:00:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Fedora review RasmusDSP-0.1-1.20090321cvs.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-28 > > ? jack-audio-connection-kit-devel - is it needed as a BuildRequires? > "grep -lr jack RasmusDSP" does not return any matches > Thanks for the review and the catch. No, jack is not needed for this. It must have slipped through while I was copying/pasting stuff from another SPEC file. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/RasmusDSP.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc10.src.rpm Changelog: 0.1-2.20090321cvs - Remove unneeded BR: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 02:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 22:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500252] Pre-Review Request: plexus-mail-sender - Plexus Archiver Component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290203.n4T23aNM020682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500252 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-28 22:03:34 EDT --- I created http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-417 for this. Though personally I feel this small source file (it is just a simple date printf) license issue is too minor to block the inclusion in fedora and the maven2 update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 03:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 23:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500248] Pre-Review Request: plexus-cli - Command Line Interface facilitator for Plexus In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290302.n4T32Swm004808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500248 --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-05-28 23:02:27 EDT --- Well I filed http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/PLX-418 under unknown component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 03:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 23:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503075] Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290333.n4T3XPiv012757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503075 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 03:53:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 23:53:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290353.n4T3rth3016984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-28 23:53:54 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290400.n4T40kUh018673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-29 00:00:45 EDT --- hmm. Build failed with error File not found by glob: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-line_profiler-1.0-0.1.b2.fc12.i386/usr/bin/kernprof.py[co] see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1382215 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290412.n4T4CjhM019695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-29 00:12:44 EDT --- Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1382220 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290432.n4T4WX9l023708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 478921 depends on bug 467239, which changed state. Bug 467239 Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478921 depends on bug 478919, which changed state. Bug 478919 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-gsi-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GSI Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478919 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-29 00:32:31 EDT --- This one is good to go too. I just have one minor question: ? Requires: globus-xio-gsi-driver Is this unversioned explicit library dependency needed (I know that it comes from the gpt file)? - rpmlint globus-io-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored - the doxygen doc is not packaged but it seems useless, so this is OK. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1382226 -------------------------------------------- This package (globus-io) is APPROVED by oget -------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:36:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:36:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290436.n4T4aC95025467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-29 00:36:11 EDT --- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: RasmusDSP Short Description: Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290437.n4T4b7Lm024738@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503075] Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290439.n4T4dTkx025237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503075 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-29 00:39:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1382209 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream. 3879c65c6eb1bee1f88790aa0041afed76d283c4 hyph_ku.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc files present. + BuildRequires are proper. + defattr usage is correct. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code. + no static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage exists. + no .la files. + no translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + no scriptlets are used. + Not a GUI app. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290452.n4T4qNQ0029447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 00:52:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:49:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:49:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290449.n4T4nuV5027950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 00:49:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:53:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:53:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290453.n4T4r7tL028620@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 00:53:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 04:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 00:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290454.n4T4s6bN029724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 00:54:05 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 05:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 01:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290520.n4T5K0tl001458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-05-29 01:19:59 EDT --- you may want to path Makefile and remove -s in install command install -Ds $(BINARY) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)/$(BINARY) to install -D $(BINARY) $(DESTDIR)$(BINDIR)/$(BINARY) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:02:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:02:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290602.n4T625qG008349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:02:05 EDT --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:00:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:00:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290600.n4T60Yds008219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:00:33 EDT --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290604.n4T64JC3007866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:04:18 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290601.n4T61FlP007517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:01:14 EDT --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290601.n4T617K5007469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #13 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-29 02:01:05 EDT --- Fedora review vfrnav-0.3-7.fc11.src.rpm 2009-05-29 $ rpmlint *.rpm vfrnav.spec vfrnav-utils.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * OK ? needs attention * rpmlint is OK * package is named according to the guidelines * specfile is named after the package * package is licensed under a Fedora approved licence (GPLv2+) * package license matches the license of the sources * license file (COPYING) is included as %doc * specfile is written in legible English * sources matches upstream $ md5sum vfrnav-0.3.tar.gz SRPM/vfrnav-0.3.tar.gz 674af747da8ea31642df815e909b2342 vfrnav-0.3.tar.gz 674af747da8ea31642df815e909b2342 SRPM/vfrnav-0.3.tar.gz * package builds in mock (Fedora 10) ? is the boost-devel BuildRequires needed? there are no include statements in the sources including any boost headers and there are no boost library dependencies in the built rpms configure does check for it though... ? directories not owned by package or its dependencies: 26x26 and 40x40 are very odd sized icons, neither /usr/share/icons/hicolor/26x26 nor /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40 are available in the hicolor-icon-theme package the subdirectories /usr/share/icons/hicolor/26x26/hildon and /usr/share/icons/hicolor/40x40/hildon are not owned by any package either - and a subdirectory called hildon is not standard either (not present in any of the directories for normal sized icons), is there a reason for not using something standard like apps instead? * no duplicate files * permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * spec file consistently uses macros * package contains code * %doc is not runtime essential ? is the utils subpackage useful/usable without the main package? it currently has no Requires on the main package * desktop files are processed with desktop-file-validate * package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * installed filenames are UTF-8 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290605.n4T65Atv009010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:05:09 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290603.n4T63Nk0008470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:03:23 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290634.n4T6YaqG013400@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-05-29 02:34:35 EDT --- Hi, Is there anything else I can do to help this along? Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290636.n4T6ahmk014100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:36:43 EDT --- RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290642.n4T6gGff015443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:42:16 EDT --- RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290641.n4T6fBpB014926@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 02:41:10 EDT --- RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:49:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:49:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290649.n4T6nNM3016996@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #2 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 02:49:22 EDT --- Thanks. I resolved, now it's good. Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/easystroke.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/easystroke-0.4.4-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290658.n4T6wmFq019179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-05-29 02:58:47 EDT --- Maybe eclipse-findbugs can be modified so %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/findbugs/plugins/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.plugin.eclipse_*/plugin becomes a symlink to %{_datadir}/findbugs/plugin. I haven't thought much about it but if this works we will get out-of-the-box new check in eclipse, whenever they are installed in findbugs folder. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 06:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 02:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290658.n4T6wadP019128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-29 02:58:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > This one is good to go too. I just have one minor question: > > ? Requires: globus-xio-gsi-driver > Is this unversioned explicit library dependency needed (I know that it comes > from the gpt file)? Yes, it is needed since it is a plugin. It is not linked to so there is no autogenerated requires on it. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-io Short Description: Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 07:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 03:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290719.n4T7JCf8022879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #3 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-05-29 03:19:11 EDT --- Note : I'm already sponsored, I just need review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 07:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 03:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503075] Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290718.n4T7IMUj023201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503075 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-05-29 03:18:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-ku Short Description: Kurdish hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 07:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 03:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] New: Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 Summary: Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at alexhudson.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync.spec SRPM URL: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync-0.43.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: csync is a lightweight utility to synchronize files between two directories, potentially on different computers. It synchronizes bidirectionally and allows the user to keep two copies of files and directories in sync. csync uses widely adopted protocols, such as smb or sftp, so that there is no need for a server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:05:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:05:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290805.n4T85UTP002663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #16 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 04:05:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345864) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345864) Kdenlive's specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290802.n4T82ntZ001893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Hans de Goede 2009-05-29 04:02:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > I hope this fixes all the problems you pointed out: > > http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd.spec > http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/openttd-0.7.1-0.2.rc2.fc11.src.rpm Looks good, but as said you should update the icon-cache scriptlets, thats not a blocker though, so: APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290803.n4T832jc001952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #25 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 04:03:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > rpmlint complains on the absence of documentation for the non -devel package. I > would alter the %file section as per following: > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %{_libdir}/*.so.* > %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt > > It effectively duplicates the README.txt and LICENSE.txt files, but I think it > is normal to repeat both of those on the two generated packages. The guideline > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplicate_Files) may not > be clear enough on that part. I'd place at least the LICENSE.txt in the main package, since it applies to the main package too. The development documentation, however, should go with -devel (unless it is so big that it should be branched into a separate -doc package). As the -devel package requires the main package, the documentation of the main package is also available whenever -devel is installed, and thus there is no need to duplicate the file(s). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:08:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:08:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290808.n4T88qwu002154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290808.n4T88Xwr002083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |zarko.pintar at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290805.n4T85nF7001767@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #17 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 04:05:47 EDT --- OK, I assigned this for review, but we have here some issues in spec file: 1. Please purify spec file. I mean that you drop your macro definitions for snapshot and ffmpeg. ffmpeg must be droped out from spec file! 2. This version is snapshot. Can you expect stable release soon? 3. I think that you do not need these BR-s: -chrpath (RPATHS resolved by %cmake_kde4 macro -gcc-c++ -qt-devel Try to build without them 4. Please, try to use BuildRoot in form of this: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) 5. Please use kde4 macros for cmake, dirs, (I'll attach kdenlive.spec as example) 6. .desktop file: Why you wrote .desktop file? Isn't a author's job? 7. Why you copy icons from /icons dir to /pixmaps? 8. %defattr must be %defattr(-,root,root,-) 9. {_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/* you can write on this way: {_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* 10.Please, try to build this package with Koji (or local Mock) for F10 and F11 branches. It must be successfully! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290814.n4T8EtW0003431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345864|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290842.n4T8gDIw010873@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #12 from Ronny Fischer 2009-05-29 04:42:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #4) > > In reply to comment #3) > > > This is "adult content". > > K, and in desktopfile of course, too... > > Of course, because nether "p0rn" nor "adult content" are categories in > freedesktop specs, see > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html That is just a minor problem since it fits into categories like network application or file transfer application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:47:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:47:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290847.n4T8l9RG012782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #4 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 04:47:08 EDT --- OK, I assigned. 1. Koji build on dist-f10 passed, but dist-f11 failed! See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1382595 2. At Changelog, the newest instances must go upper then old ones, so change this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290847.n4T8lNK1012241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 08:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 04:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290847.n4T8lkIl012986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |zarko.pintar at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 09:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 05:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503148] New: Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503148 Summary: Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: floriansievert at phobeus.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://floriansievert.de/linux/repo/f11/unstable/specs/kmess.spec SRPM URL: http://floriansievert.de/linux/repo/f11/unstable/srpms/kmess-2.0beta2-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: kmess is a msn clone for kde. It is in copetition with kopete, but is offering much more msn specific features. There are quite some people out there, who are waiting for this instant messenger. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 09:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 05:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290937.n4T9b1i1024667@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #5 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-05-29 05:37:00 EDT --- Ok, I see, it will be better to have to SPEC file : one with %exclude line, the other without. Sorry for the mistake in changelog. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 09:55:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 05:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905290955.n4T9tukx028748@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #6 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-05-29 05:55:55 EDT --- (files are updated) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 10:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 06:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291029.n4TATEkS004279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #18 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-29 06:29:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > OK, I assigned this for review, but we have here some issues in spec file: > > 1. Please purify spec file. I mean that you drop your macro definitions for > snapshot and ffmpeg. ffmpeg must be droped out from spec file! I will do it. I just kept them for now so I can fully test the resulting rpm. > > 2. This version is snapshot. Can you expect stable release soon? I think so. It was promised sometime ago, but maybe the author is trying to provide a better pulse support (I suggested him to talk to Lennard). > > 3. I think that you do not need these BR-s: > -chrpath (RPATHS resolved by %cmake_kde4 macro > -gcc-c++ > -qt-devel > Try to build without them They are not needed. I just used qt-devel to specify the minimum version. > > 4. Please, try to use BuildRoot in form of this: > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} > -n) > Done. I should have missed the %{version} in a cut-and-paste action. > 5. Please use kde4 macros for cmake, dirs, (I'll attach kdenlive.spec as > example) > Done. > 6. .desktop file: > Why you wrote .desktop file? Isn't a author's job? I did not find any desktop entry, so I wrote one. > > 7. Why you copy icons from /icons dir to /pixmaps? Not really necessary. Removed. > > 8. %defattr must be %defattr(-,root,root,-) Done. > > 9. {_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/*/* you can write on this way: > {_datadir}/icons/hicolor/* > Would I not have been claiming ownership of the intermediate directories this way? > 10.Please, try to build this package with Koji (or local Mock) for F10 and F11 > branches. It must be successfully! It is building just fine. SPEC: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/kradio4.spec SRPM: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/kradio4-4.0.0-0.10.r883.20090514.fc10.src.rpm Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 10:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 06:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291042.n4TAg6mm007028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #7 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 06:42:04 EDT --- - I thin that you do not need this: ============================================================= update-mime-database %{_kde4_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : ============================================================= This is neded only if application drops an XML file in %{_datadir}/mime/packages. Please, can you explain this: ============================================= unset QTINC QTLIB QTPATH_LRELEASE QMAKESPEC export QT4DIR=%{_libdir}/qt4 export QTDIR=$QT4DIR PATH=$QT4DIR/bin:$PATH ; export PATH ============================================= Do we need this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291116.n4TBGbCM013851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #8 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 07:16:36 EDT --- Huh, forget last message, it isn't from this story ;) BTW, your spec seem to be OK, please change to this: %if %{?fedora} < 11 %exclude %{_bindir}/motor.py? %endif I -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:17:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:17:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291117.n4TBHlNQ014572@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #19 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 07:17:46 EDT --- - I thin that you do not need this: ============================================================= update-mime-database %{_kde4_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : ============================================================= This is neded only if application drops an XML file in %{_datadir}/mime/packages. Please, can you explain this: ============================================= unset QTINC QTLIB QTPATH_LRELEASE QMAKESPEC export QT4DIR=%{_libdir}/qt4 export QTDIR=$QT4DIR PATH=$QT4DIR/bin:$PATH ; export PATH ============================================= Do we need this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291133.n4TBXRAN018242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #20 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-29 07:33:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > - I thin that you do not need this: > ============================================================= > update-mime-database %{_kde4_datadir}/mime &> /dev/null || : > ============================================================= > > This is neded only if application drops an XML file in > %{_datadir}/mime/packages. I will remove it. > > Please, can you explain this: > ============================================= > unset QTINC QTLIB QTPATH_LRELEASE QMAKESPEC > export QT4DIR=%{_libdir}/qt4 > export QTDIR=$QT4DIR > PATH=$QT4DIR/bin:$PATH ; export PATH > ============================================= > > Do we need this? If we build with mock, the answer is no, we do not need this. However, If a user try to rebuild the package, he could have set in his environment the variables for QT3, and the build will fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:38:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:38:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291138.n4TBcfw9018156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Andreas Osowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Andreas Osowski 2009-05-29 07:38:39 EDT --- Sorry for the delay, PACKAGE APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291143.n4TBhaJU019852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #9 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 07:43:35 EDT --- Last notes... - License is LGPLv2+ in COPYING file, but in python code stands GPLv2. Can you clarify? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:46:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:46:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291146.n4TBkGD9019623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-29 07:46:14 EDT --- Okay. I'll change the scriptlets before adding it to the CVS. Thank you for your review. It is much appreciated. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: openttd Short Description: Transport system simulation game Owners: heffer Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291149.n4TBn30J020719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |redhat at linuxnetz.de Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-29 07:49:02 EDT --- No problem, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mongrel_cluster Short Description: GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server Owners: robert Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291151.n4TBpYQ9020768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #21 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 07:51:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > If we build with mock, the answer is no, we do not need this. > However, If a user try to rebuild the package, he could have set > in his environment the variables for QT3, and the build will fail. Hmm, I think that is not good idea to change users local environment with src.RPM file. I never seen before that type of case....and nobody want from me to adjust my spec files to users local environment... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 11:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 07:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291156.n4TBuwpx022745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 alvaro rincon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alvarorincon2005 at yahoo.com --- Comment #15 from alvaro rincon 2009-05-29 07:56:55 EDT --- i compiled it succesfully in fedora 10, it works fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:15:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:15:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291215.n4TCFKRd026333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #10 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-05-29 08:15:18 EDT --- No I can't, while it's not blocking (both are accepted in fedora). But I have send an email to the author to clarify the situation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291218.n4TCI3oK025964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #22 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-29 08:18:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > (In reply to comment #20) > > If we build with mock, the answer is no, we do not need this. > > However, If a user try to rebuild the package, he could have set > > in his environment the variables for QT3, and the build will fail. > > > Hmm, I think that is not good idea to change users local environment with > src.RPM file. In fact, I am not changing his environment. The change only occurs in the shell used to build the rpm (which inherits the user variables). > > I never seen before that type of case....and nobody want from me to adjust my > spec files to users local environment... As I said, it can be removed. I am trying to create an internetradio package, with the plugin which requires ffmpeg. Would you mind taking a look at it, also? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291227.n4TCRepi028396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #11 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 08:27:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > No I can't, while it's not blocking (both are accepted in fedora). Yes, I know. But I want to know which one is relevant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291225.n4TCPDF1028046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-29 08:25:10 EDT --- Fedora review dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-29 $ rpmlint *.rpm *.spec dssi-vst-wine.i386: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * OK ? needs attention * rpmlint is OK * package is named according to guidelines * specfile is named after the package * package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (GPLv2) * package license corresponds to the license of the package sources * license file (COPYING) is included as %doc * specfile is written in legible English * sources matches upstream $ md5sum dssi-vst-0.8.tar.gz SRPM/dssi-vst-0.8.tar.gz 2d46474eaf84f0a2efc2389edaa18e3a dssi-vst-0.8.tar.gz 2d46474eaf84f0a2efc2389edaa18e3a SRPM/dssi-vst-0.8.tar.gz * package builds in mock in ix86 and x86_64 (Fedora 10) * package has exclusive arch for ix86 and x86_64 (requires wine) * BuildRequires are sane * package owns all directories it creates - both the main and wine subpackages own /usr/lib/dssi/dssi-vst, but that is necessary since the packages Require each other * no duplicate files * permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * specfile uses macros consistently * package contains code * subpackage interdepencies used fully qualified versions ? the wine subpackage owns /usr/lib/dssi which is also owned by the dssi package - should the wine subpackage require dssi instead? * %install clears buildroot * installed filenames are UTF8 The minor issue above you can fix post-review. Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:32:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:32:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291232.n4TCWSxK029504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #23 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 08:32:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > > As I said, it can be removed. > OK, maybe it is a good idea. If someone have complaint about that, we can do an update of package with these lines... > I am trying to create an internetradio package, with the plugin which requires > ffmpeg. Would you mind taking a look at it, also? Sure, why not! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] New: Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Summary: Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-application.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-application-1.1.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package is a collection of modules that are useful when building python applications. Their purpose is to eliminate the need to divert resources into implementing the small tasks that every application needs to do in order to run successfully and focus instead on the application logic itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] New: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Summary: Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The Crypt::GPG module provides access to the functionality of the GnuPG (www.gnupg.org) encryption tool through an object oriented interface. It provides methods for encryption, decryption, signing, signature verification, key generation, key certification, export and import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291241.n4TCfRmO031528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #15 from Nils Philippsen 2009-05-29 08:41:24 EDT --- Thanks for your effort, but I'll not use your patch because it's not very readable (better use unified diffs: diff -u) and I want to discuss some things: (In reply to comment #11) > - Instead of make clean'ing in between building the different versions, I'd > suggest using off-root builds. Later you said you had problems with that, what were these? > ** > > rpmlint output: > xsane.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsane-0.996/xsane.CHANGES > xsane.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsane-0.996/xsane.PROBLEMS > xsane.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/xsane-0.996/xsane.INSTALL > xsane-gimp.x86_64: W: no-documentation > 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. > > - You need to convert these to UTF-8 in the setup phase: > > for doc in xsane.{CHANGES,PROBLEMS,INSTALL}; do > iconv -f ISO-8859-1 -t utf8 $doc -o $doc.new && \ > touch -r $doc $doc.new && \ > mv $doc.new $doc > done applied > - You don't need BR: sed, it is in the standard buildroot. removed > - No need to define desktop_vendor as it is only used in two places and is not > even supposed to be changed. "Existing packages that use a vendor tag must continue to do so for the life of the package." As this is a merge review, i.e. the package isn't new, I'll leave it as it is. > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK > - Package must not own > %dir %{_datadir}/applications > which is a standard system directory. > - gimp package must Requires: gimp for dir ownership and not own > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp/plugins.d fixed (-gimp subpackage already requires gimp) > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK > - %{_datadir}/sane, %{_datadir}/sane/xsane and > %{_datadir}/sane/xsane/xsane-eula.txt are owned by both xsane and xsane-gimp. > Is there a good reason for this? If xsane-gimp needs those files, it'd be wiser > to let xsane own them and put a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to > xsane-gimp. xsane and xsane-gimp can be installed independently, they both need the same xsane-eula.txt file. I believe the rule you're hinting on means files listed twice for the same package (e.g. twice in "%files gimp") > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK > - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root). The latter (which I use) is functionally equivalent to the former (which isn't mandatory either). > MUST: Clean section exists. OK > MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A > > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSWORK > - Remove unneeded files from doc (rm in setup or install phase): xsane.RPM, > xsane.conf, xsane.spec*, xsane.INSTALL, xsane.REMOVE I've changed the file list to only include the other documentation files. I've commited my changes to Rawhide CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:51:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:51:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291251.n4TCpcVZ001331@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #13 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-05-29 08:51:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > ... since it would be easily possible for underaged users to > get adult contents from the web. Besides that it isn't guaranteed that every > content downloaded is from legal sources. The same thing applies for Firefox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:57:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:57:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291257.n4TCvJi4002569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 08:57:16 EDT --- openttd-opengfx-0-0.4.alpha4.2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-opengfx-0-0.4.alpha4.2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 12:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 08:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291259.n4TCxJM5003266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 08:59:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > Thanks for your effort, but I'll not use your patch because it's not very > readable (better use unified diffs: diff -u) and I want to discuss some things: Right. You could have generated an unified diff by patching a local copy of the spec file, though :) > (In reply to comment #11) > > - Instead of make clean'ing in between building the different versions, I'd > > suggest using off-root builds. > > Later you said you had problems with that, what were these? The automake stuff isn't configured properly. First of all, configure reads some xsane. files (at least xsane.NEWS), so one needs to copy them to the build dir. After that things got even messier since it seemed that there were problems with header files etc as well. This could of course be overcome rather simply: do a manual setup of the build tree by extracting the tarball twice into separate subdirs (gimp and nogimp) where the builds can be made separately. This of course doubles the size of the -debuginfo package (although I'm not sure if debugging xsane-gimp is even possible now!). > > - No need to define desktop_vendor as it is only used in two places and is not > > even supposed to be changed. > > "Existing packages that use a vendor tag must continue to do so for the life of > the package." As this is a merge review, i.e. the package isn't new, I'll leave > it as it is. Yes, that's exactly my point. As there are only two instances where the macro is used, I'd replace them both with "fedora". > > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > > that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK > > - Package must not own > > %dir %{_datadir}/applications > > which is a standard system directory. > > - gimp package must Requires: gimp for dir ownership and not own > > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp > > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/gimp/plugins.d > > fixed (-gimp subpackage already requires gimp) Only in %post and %postun phases. > > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. NEEDSWORK > > - %{_datadir}/sane, %{_datadir}/sane/xsane and > > %{_datadir}/sane/xsane/xsane-eula.txt are owned by both xsane and xsane-gimp. > > Is there a good reason for this? If xsane-gimp needs those files, it'd be wiser > > to let xsane own them and put a Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to > > xsane-gimp. > > xsane and xsane-gimp can be installed independently, they both need the same > xsane-eula.txt file. I believe the rule you're hinting on means files listed > twice for the same package (e.g. twice in "%files gimp") http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles "A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. If you think your package is a valid exception to this, please bring it to the attention of the Packaging Committee so they can improve on this Guideline." Now you have xsane-eula.txt and the directories listed twice. Of course, you can get around this by putting xsane-eula.txt in %doc of the xsane-gimp package. > > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK > > - Use %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root). > > The latter (which I use) is functionally equivalent to the former (which isn't > mandatory either). Hmm, the guideline at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions states: "Unless you have a very good reason to deviate from that, you should use %defattr(-,root,root,-) for all %files sections in your package." Please, just use the version of the guideline. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291302.n4TD2cN3003864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 09:02:37 EDT --- The defattr line of the gimp package should be changed too in the above patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226658] Merge Review: xsane In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291300.n4TD0rgT003627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226658 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 09:00:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345904) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345904) Patch in unified mode -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291312.n4TDCD5G006177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #24 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-29 09:12:12 EDT --- This is the Fedora version, without ffmpeg: SPEC: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/kradio4.spec SRPMS: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/kradio4-4.0.0-0.12.r883.20090514.fc10.src.rpm This is the full version, which also creates a kradio4-internetradio: SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/kradio4.spec SRPMS: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/kradio4-4.0.0-0.11.r883.20090514.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291311.n4TDBNaS006484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 09:11:21 EDT --- openttd-opengfx-0-0.4.alpha4.2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-opengfx-0-0.4.alpha4.2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:40:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:40:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291340.n4TDefWi012915@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #31 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-05-29 09:40:38 EDT --- Jarod, libirman has been just moved to F10/F11: Subject: libirman-0.4.5-3.fc11 successfully moved from dist-f11-updates-candidate into dist-f11-updates by bodhi Subject: libirman-0.4.5-3.fc10 successfully moved from dist-f10-updates-candidate into dist-f10-updates by bodhi These should be available now or in a few minutes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:46:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291346.n4TDkmLg014753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #16 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-05-29 09:46:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > One last thing: I suggest to also require gnome-system-monitor, since it is in > the right click menu. But you can change this after import into CVS. I have > just sponsored you. Christoph, I'm not entirely sure where you found that, but on my system the right-click menu has only the following options: - About - Remove From Panel - Move - Lock To Panel The package is currently imported into CVS (F-11 and devel) but not yet built pending this question. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:51:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:51:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291351.n4TDpAtt015586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 --- Comment #17 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 09:51:09 EDT --- Sorry, my bad, that was another applet. You can start your builds now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:53:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:53:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291353.n4TDrmZJ016024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #25 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-29 09:53:47 EDT --- - We have trouble here: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u}-n) MUST be: BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) (space between %{__id_u} and -n parameter), otherwise we get rpmlint errors. -rpmlint drops errors: kradio4.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/kde4/apps/kradio4/default-dot-lircrc "lircrcd" kradio4.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/kde4/apps/kradio4/default-dot-lircrc 0644 Can you examine this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 13:57:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 09:57:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291357.n4TDvqEo018258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-29 09:57:51 EDT --- I won't have time to work on this package for the next couple of weeks, if someone wants to take over, be my guest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:02:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291402.n4TE2oab018190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #26 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-29 10:02:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > - We have trouble here: > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u}-n) > > MUST be: > BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) > > (space between %{__id_u} and -n parameter), otherwise we get rpmlint errors. No problem. Fixed. Same URLS. > > -rpmlint drops errors: > > kradio4.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/kde4/apps/kradio4/default-dot-lircrc "lircrcd" > kradio4.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/kde4/apps/kradio4/default-dot-lircrc 0644 > > Can you examine this? This is not really a script. This is just a lirc configuration file, for using a remote control. [cascavel:~/specs] more /usr/share/kde4/apps/kradio4/default-dot-lircrc #! lircrcd begin button = * prog = kradio config = eventmap repeat = 1 end -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] New: Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Summary: Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lemenkov at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-gnutls.spec SRPM URL: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-gnutls-1.1.8-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This package provides a high level object oriented wrapper around gnutls, as well as low level bindings to the GNUTLS types and functions via ctypes. The high level wrapper hides the details of accessing the GNUTLS library via ctypes behind a set of classes that encapsulate GNUTLS sessions, certificates and credentials and expose them to python applications using a simple API. The package also includes a Twisted interface that has seamless intergration with Twisted, providing connectTLS and listenTLS methods on the Twisted reactor once imported (the methods are automatically attached to the reactor by simply importing the GNUTLS Twisted interface module). The high level wrapper is written using the GNUTLS library bindings that are made available via ctypes. This makes the wrapper very powerful and flexible as it has direct access to all the GNUTLS internals and is also very easy to extend without any need to write C code or recompile anything. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291429.n4TETV6L025371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #14 from Thomas Sailer 2009-05-29 10:29:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) Thanks for starting the review! > ? is the boost-devel BuildRequires needed? Indeed. It's not needed. > ? directories not owned by package or its dependencies: Convert the icons to more standard sizes (using ImageMagick), and then store them in the correct locations. Now at least plasma finds them. > ? is the utils subpackage useful/usable without the main package? > it currently has no Requires on the main package You could use the database conversion utilities in vfrnav-utils without vfrnav. But I added the Requires now, it doesn't hurt either. SRPM: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav-0.3-8.fc11.src.rpm SPEC: http://sailer.fedorapeople.org/vfrnav.spec Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1383258 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:25:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:25:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291425.n4TEPME1024554@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-05-29 10:25:21 EDT --- Review of agedu REVIEW GUIDELINES OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint agedu.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/agedu- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10.x86_64.rpm agedu-debuginfo-0-1.r8442.fc10.x86_64.rpm [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/agedu-* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . This is effectively a pre-release version and the svn revision is noted after the release notation. OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. CHECK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Package released under the MIT license. OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. SPEC file reports MIT which agrees with the website, LICENCE file in source, and licence.h OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. FIX: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. As noted before this is still a problem [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ md5sum ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz* b237e584844d30d7a8a815aae11e57c1 ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz.1 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz.2 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz.3 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz.4 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 ../SOURCES/agedu-r8442.tar.gz.5 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Works on at least x86_64 NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. N/A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Regarding the source not matching, the above is a different md5sum: [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum agedu-r8442.tar.gz* b237e584844d30d7a8a815aae11e57c1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.1 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.2 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.3 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.4 1d92b5ac8e5368c9ad7b9be5ecc56cb1 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.5 c41cb4fb26acc8691d047e7542dd9331 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.6 c41cb4fb26acc8691d047e7542dd9331 agedu-r8442.tar.gz.7 I downloaded source from the source url in the spec twice more and received different checksums. I also had someone else replicate my findings. and they were table to replicate the same md5sum problems. I almost wonder if that's a host issue on the machine that's serving them up, as tightly downloaded samples are all the same md5sum, but separated by a few hours or more and it becomes different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291428.n4TES66T025600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #11 from D Haley 2009-05-29 10:28:04 EDT --- Thanks for the pointers. I have re-enabled the latex documentation. SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-5.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-5.fc10.src.rpm $ rpmlint -vi stxxl.spec ../SRPMS/stxxl-1.2.1-5.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-1.2.1-5.fc10.i386.rpm stxxl.src: I: checking stxxl.i386: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Koji: F9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1383288 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1383287 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - porn downloader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291439.n4TEdUMM028330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #14 from Ronny Fischer 2009-05-29 10:39:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #9) > > ... since it would be easily possible for underaged users to > > get adult contents from the web. Besides that it isn't guaranteed that every > > content downloaded is from legal sources. > > The same thing applies for Firefox. That applies to most network transfer applications but neither firefox nor a ftp client or a bittorrent client is directly intended to download adult content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:41:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:41:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291441.n4TEfX1r029526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291443.n4TEhCD6029786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:45:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:45:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291445.n4TEjtil030919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 10:45:53 EDT --- Ugh. I emailed the author about the issue, my guess is that the tarball is generated from SVN every N hours or so. Of course I could switch to using an own tarball generated from upstream SVN, which would circumvent the problem, but I'd rather use the one straight from upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 14:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 10:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291456.n4TEuZvJ001195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #6 from Greg Adair 2009-05-29 10:56:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I just compiled this today and tested. It is very cool! The only issue I've > found so far is that using the --html option described in the man page causes a > segmentation fault. This option is something we'd like to use so that we can > keep a historical record. I've emailed the author to see if this is a known > issue or not. This was user error. When you create the index pointing to a specific directory you have to use the same directory when creating the html. For example, I created an index at /cluster/scratch. I then tried to run agedu with the --html flag thinking it was going to write the html to that directory. Instead I had to run it with the --html flag pointed to /cluster/scratch. When I did this it dumps the html to stdout. I then ran again and redirected it to a file where I needed it stored. Great program! Two enhancements I'd love. 1). Dump the entire HTML tree so that you don't loose the drill down capability you get with the interactive "-w" flag. 2). Create an index that doesn't have to be removed every time you need updated data. Something similar to the way rsync only updates necessary changes. As it stands now recreating on a multi terabyte filesystem daily is very time consuming. Thanks again to the author. Please include this in future RHEL releases! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 236856] Review Request: brlcad - An extensive Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) modeling system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291508.n4TF84iZ004868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236856 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-05-29 11:08:03 EDT --- alvaro rincon, do you want maintain it? Feel free open new Review Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:17:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291517.n4TFHRdN007676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291517.n4TFHDOF007602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291516.n4TFGh4a007468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #9 from Adam Miller 2009-05-29 11:16:41 EDT --- The new release looks good to me, upstream fixed the issues I had. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] New: Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 Summary: Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: terjeros at phys.ntnu.no QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/moserial/moserial.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/moserial/moserial-2.26.1-1.fc10.src.rpm koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1383370 url: http://live.gnome.org/moserial/ description: Moserial is a clean, friendly gtk-based serial terminal for the gnome desktop. It is written in Vala for extra goodness. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291516.n4TFGNlB007378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(felix at fetzig.org) --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-29 11:16:22 EDT --- + GOOD: rpmlint is silent on both source and binary package. + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + GOOD: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . ? UNEASY: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . I would feel much better if you mentioned somehwere (specfile, copyright statements in the source code) explicit permission to package it in Fedora from http://dansguardian.org/?page=copyright2: * freely (no cost) downloadable from this site for general purpose unix distributions like FreeBSD, Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, etc Otherwise we could look like changing software's license without author's permission. + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. see the previous point, it is correct as of now; it would have to be changed, if license files are not changed, or changed in different way. - BAD: LICENSE file is in %doc. It isn't ... COPYING file that is. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 68c8e9a97a3b58d2467a19cb15db5599 + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1383216 + GOOD: builds on all architectures + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. (builds in koji) + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: no libraries + GOOD: not relocatable + GOOD: A package owns all directories that it creates. + GOOD: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: The package does not contain library files with a suffix. + GOOD: No devel packages. + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. Please fix or explain above show issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291520.n4TFKwlk009148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-05-29 11:20:56 EDT --- So I'll start with the painful stuff: There are bundled libraries in WebCalendar which will need to be packaged separately. Those I have found in my brief initial search: hkit ( includes/classes/hKit ) http://allinthehead.com/code/hkit/ Illustrating one of the problems with bundled libraries, this particular library is at 0.4, while upstream has been at 0.5 for at least a year. PHPMailer ( includes/classes/phpmailer ) http://sourceforge.net/projects/phpmailer This appears to be using a version that's almost 6 years old, while upstream has been releasing as recently as this week. captcha ( includes/classes/captcha ) In addition to being a bundled library that needs to be separately packaged: The original was Public Domain, changes were made by Ray Jones, but with no indication of how his changes were licensed. While I am sure a very liberal reading would mean that this is also under public domain, given the difficulty of actually giving up rights available under copyright, I'd feel better if Ray Jones communicated a specific license - lets at least try and ask him. Interestingly, the link to the freshmeat site no longer works. >From a licensing perspective the icon bit below causes me a bit of concern (includes/menu/index.php): * This menu was created using some fantastic free tools out on the internet: * - Most icons by everaldo at http://en.crystalxp.net/ (with his permission ) * - Javascript & CSS by JSCookMenu at http://www.cs.ucla.edu/~heng/JSCookMenu/ That said JSCookMenu at the above location is another bundled lib -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:24:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] New: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Summary: Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jonathansteffan at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/blueproximity-1.2.5-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: This software helps you add a little more security to your desktop. It does so by detecting one of your bluetooth devices, most likely your mobile phone, and keeping track of its distance. If you move away from your computer and the distance is above a certain level (no measurement in meters is possible) for a given time, it automatically locks your desktop (or starts any other shell command you want). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:30:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:30:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503075] Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291530.n4TFUp29012452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503075 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 11:30:50 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:30:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:30:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291530.n4TFUBUo012205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 11:30:10 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:31:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:31:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291531.n4TFVxRu012359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 11:31:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291532.n4TFWTw2012473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(felix at fetzig.org) | --- Comment #4 from Felix Kaechele 2009-05-29 11:32:28 EDT --- Thank you for your review. I adressed the issues you pointed out and updated the spec file: Spec: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/dansguardian.spec SRPM: http://heffer.fedorapeople.org/review/dansguardian-2.10.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291532.n4TFWrpK013170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 11:32:52 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:38:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:38:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291538.n4TFcNlE014156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-29 11:38:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Fedora review dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10.src.rpm 2009-05-29 > Thank you for the review! > ? the wine subpackage owns /usr/lib/dssi which is also owned by the > dssi package - should the wine subpackage require dssi instead? > There is a subtlety here. I first thought of doing it that way but then I realized that it would be problematic on x86_64. On x86_64, when someone installs dssi-vst, the dssi-vst.x86_64 dssi-vst-wine.i586 packages will be installed. If I put a Requires: dssi on the dssi-vst-wine package, it will pull dssi.x86_64 during installation, and dssi.x86_64 does not own /usr/lib/dssi. The only solution I found was to own /usr/lib/dssi by dssi-vst-wine.i586 so that we have all directories owned in all archs. Please let me know if you find a better solution. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dssi-vst Short Description: DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 214087] Review Request: libextractor -- Simple library for keyword extraction In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291538.n4TFcJRu014720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=214087 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 11:38:15 EDT --- I'm going to go ahead and branch this as I've seen statements elsewhere that Enrico doesn't wish to be involved with EPEL, but that he's OK with someone branches his packages for EPEL as long as he's not bothered by the process. If that is not the case, I sincerely apologize. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291550.n4TFoOS7017527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 11:50:23 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:50:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:50:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503075] Review Request: hyphen-ku - Kurdish hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291550.n4TFoquJ017634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503075 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 15:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 11:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291556.n4TFuN9P019757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #25 from D Haley 2009-05-29 11:56:19 EDT --- OK, seeing as no-one else has so far proposed a package that everyone can agree on, here's my shot: SPEC URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gluegen.spec SRPM URL : http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/gluegen-1.0-0.135.svn.fc10.src.rpm koji: No, requires cpptasks (can someone reopen cpptasks?) rpmlint: $ rpmlint gluegen.spec ../SRPMS/gluegen-1.0-0.135.svn.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/gluegen-1.0-0.135.svn.fc10.i386.rpm 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:17:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:17:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291617.n4TGH9O7025020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #10 from Jerry James 2009-05-29 12:17:08 EDT --- That would be nice, but that particular approach won't work. The directory %{_datadir}/eclipse/dropins/findbugs/plugins/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.plugin.eclipse_*/plugin contains information about the findbugs plugin for Eclipse, while %{_datadir}/findbugs/plugin contains plugins for Findbugs; i.e., they're different animals altogether. It looks to me like eclipse-findbugs would have to be modified to make this work. I'll have to bring this up with upstream and see if they have any ideas. In the meantime, can we proceed with the current package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291619.n4TGJpsA025927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-05-29 12:19:50 EDT --- Thanks for your review, David. >From your remarks, I can imagine I have to package all those bundled libraries separately myself, since none of them is available on Fedora yet. This may take a while. I'll attempt to do so in the very next weeks and submit separate review requests for them, so don't expect a lot of activity on the current one during this time. The link to captcha is now http://freshmeat.net/projects/captchaphp. Ray Jones is one of WebCalendar developers, so I can imagine the modifications he made are public domain or GPL. But I'll ask him. Anyway, that will be another package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291624.n4TGOwSH027062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 12:24:57 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-0.3.rc2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-0.7.1-0.3.rc2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291624.n4TGOvcH027004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 12:24:56 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-0.3.rc2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-0.7.1-0.3.rc2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291640.n4TGec29032142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-29 12:40:37 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291639.n4TGdnVQ031772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-05-29 12:39:48 EDT --- Yes, and unfortunately I can empathize with your pain. Once you start getting some of the libraries packaged, please don't hesitate to ping me and I'll be happy to review those as well, and hopefully get things moving pretty quickly. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:47:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:47:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291647.n4TGl0XJ001483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #4 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-05-29 12:46:59 EDT --- Many thanks for your cooperation and help proposals -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488618] Review Request: Likewise Open - Likewise Active Directory Authentication Services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291646.n4TGkpXt001433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488618 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(krishnag at likewise | |.com) --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-29 12:46:48 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 16:51:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:51:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291651.n4TGpS1f002705@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #32 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-05-29 12:51:27 EDT --- Thanks to all, lirc-0.8.5-2.fc10.i386 works well with IRMAN. :-) Closing bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:13:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:13:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291713.n4THDY6j008634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 --- Comment #10 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-29 13:13:34 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291711.n4THBZH6008231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345810|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291711.n4THBuvT008322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345829|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:11:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:11:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291711.n4THBJo8008149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345768|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291713.n4THD1rW008893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 --- Comment #9 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-29 13:13:00 EDT --- Looks good to me. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291719.n4THJ7nK010060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #345829|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #5 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-29 13:19:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345932) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345932) nuked --vendor Nuked the --vendor for desktop-file install. I've fixed the COPYING file in the upstream tree http://git.gnome.org/cgit/PolicyKit-gnome/commit/?id=96e92020e8f98b5b290215d9f6c7e02861c7bfd5 and this will be in 0.92 (won't build it anyway until 0.92 releases are out). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:22:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:22:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291722.n4THMB9W011227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-29 13:22:10 EDT --- ok, approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291721.n4THLTdK011056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-29 13:21:28 EDT --- ok, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291724.n4THO6wi011638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-29 13:24:05 EDT --- ok, approved. I assume the 0.92 releases will find a permanent upstream location, too... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291729.n4THTAqp012545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-29 13:29:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eggdbus Short Description: Experimenal D-Bus bindings for GObject Owners: davidz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:29:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:29:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291729.n4THTDPH012583@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-29 13:29:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: polkit Short Description: PolicyKit Authorization Framework Owners: davidz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291729.n4THTFFh012889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 David Zeuthen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Zeuthen 2009-05-29 13:29:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: polkit-gnome Short Description: PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop Owners: davidz Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484644] Review Request: screenlets - Fully themeable mini-apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291730.n4THUYPt013529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484644 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-29 13:30:31 EDT --- Umm.. I think the license text src/share/screenlets/ClearWeather/themes/default/weather_icons_readme.txt is very questionable. ------------------------------------------------------------------- These weather images are (c) 2003 by Stardock Corporation. All rights reserved. Permission: Stardock gives you permission to distribute these images and or icons freely as long as this permission document is included. Allowed Uses: You may use these images with any Stardock related product (such as creating DesktopX objects or ObjectDock or plugins). In addition, Stardock licenses this for use with content that is provided free of charge and is not connected to a commercial software product. You may use these images for skins, themes, and other content for freeware software even if it is competitive in nature with Stardock's offerings as long as the copyright notices are included. You may not, however, bundle these images in any way with any software product without Stardock's express permission. You may use these images in your website or product as long as this permission.txt is linked somewhere along with Stardock's copyright notice with a link to Stardock's homepage: http://www.stardock.com. Designed Use: These weather images are designed to provide the various weather conditions reported by weather services. It was created for use with Stardock DesktopX (http://www.desktopx.net) and Stardock ObjectDock (http://www.objectdock.com) both of which allow users to monitor the weather conditions from their desktop. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Once setting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291730.n4THUsCH013251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622 --- Comment #9 from Tim Fenn 2009-05-29 13:30:53 EDT --- Still waiting for info regarding the licensing on some of the subpackages, aqua is apparently LGPLv2+ but seems unavailable other than as part of APBS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291756.n4THu4TB020106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 13:56:03 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291756.n4THuqp4020269@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 13:56:52 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 17:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 13:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291757.n4THvRW0020266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 13:57:27 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:00:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:00:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291800.n4TI07eL021173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Janssen 2009-05-29 14:00:05 EDT --- Scratch koji-build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1380908 -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:04:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:04:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291804.n4TI4P8F022278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #12 from Dan Fuhry 2009-05-29 14:04:22 EDT --- 1. The way Enano bundles libraries, we only use parts that are very, very unlikely to result in security vulnerabilities because they are only ever given sanitized input. 2. I've checked the validity of these. * engine_failsafe: from the phpBB project (v2.0.21), and is GPLv2+. Clarified in comments in upstream. * Tigra: we got them to license it under the GPL. I will be fixing the comments in upstream shortly. * Prefilter: this is an upstream licensing issue for us. Prefilter is from Text_Wiki. The file is a skeleton anyway. I suspect the author labeled it wrongly. I'll just rewrite this file for Enano. See: http://hg.enanocms.org/repos/enano-1.1/file/tip/includes/wikiengine/Render/Plain/Prefilter.php * I'm considering removing the graph stuff. It wasn't used for very long and I was afraid of API breakage which is the only reason it's still in there. I don't know about stuff under the PHP license; from what I know (and I could very likely be wrong), it should be legal to link code under the PHP License with GPL code. * The failsafe graph code (with that sketchy comment) is GPL. Citation: http://google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#bvpP-RfBwPE/sb_statsbar.php&q=%22function%20BarGraphHoriz%22 Going by the fact that this file was released in 2006, and it points to the URL which always shows the latest version of the license, it would be very safe to assume this means GPLv2 or later. I still might remove it because it's a stale and unmaintained part of the API. One quick question. Have you looked at licenses/index.html? Do that and *then* tell us what our problems are. Every third party component that's been added to Enano with the exception of public domain code has been documented in that file, with copies of all relevant licenses included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:06:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:06:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291806.n4TI6aJ8023287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #13 from Dan Fuhry 2009-05-29 14:06:35 EDT --- Whoops, that Hg link should be: http://hg.enanocms.org/repos/enano-1.1/file/fa665a95e99d/includes/wikiengine/Render/Plain/Prefilter.php -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291820.n4TIKiJg026753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 14:20:43 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291820.n4TIKsvg026818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 14:20:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:21:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291821.n4TIL4OH026876@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-29 14:21:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:24:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:24:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291824.n4TIOvfV027653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 14:24:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ugh. > > I emailed the author about the issue, my guess is that the tarball is generated > from SVN every N hours or so. Okay, got a reply from upstream: On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 16:00 +0100, Simon Tatham wrote: "Jussi Lehtola" wrote: > > > Is the tarball regenerated from svn by a cron job or whatnot? > > Yes. This explains the changing md5sum. Technically, the source matches upstream, even if the md5sum of the tarball changes every now and then. Can you approve the package now? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291831.n4TIVwQE029323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from David Nalley 2009-05-29 14:31:56 EDT --- worksforme Thanks for following up with upstream. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291830.n4TIU4DI029199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-29 14:30:02 EDT --- Again what need to be done is to see if this gluegen is capable to build jogl. If not, there is no reason to validate this package because it will fail the usability test of the package review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291833.n4TIXB4d029787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #14 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-05-29 14:33:10 EDT --- For security, that's not really good enough. Sanitising input is necessary whether you bundle your libraries or not. Bundling means that if foo.php v1.1 has an unintended flaw that allows users to access resources they shouldn't (or DOS the server or...) even without injection, and upstream foo fixes that by releasing foo-2.0 we will upgrade the foo package ASAP. But we don't know that enano is carrying an old, insecure foo-1.1 because you didn't notice the security announcement or didn't immediately release a new enano version. System administrators rely on us to keep their software free of security vulnerabilities. Not bundling libraries is one way that we ensure that. For the PHP license: http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291834.n4TIYgQR030028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 14:34:41 EDT --- Nope, there is still the issue of the optflags: In the beginning of the build process you see a lot of gcc -Wall -std=gnu9x -pedantic -I.. -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I.. -I/usr/include -O2 -DNDEBUG -I./samdump2 -c -o list.o list.c and the linking uses g++ -m64 -Wl,-O1 -o ../ophcrack main.o ophcrackgui.o hashmodel.o tablemodel.o progdelegate.o tabledialog.o singlehashdialog.o hashview.o samdialog.o aboutdialog.o helpdialog.o graphdialog.o histogram_item.o exportdialog.o moc_ophcrackgui.o moc_hashmodel.o moc_tablemodel.o moc_progdelegate.o moc_tabledialog.o moc_singlehashdialog.o moc_hashview.o moc_samdialog.o moc_aboutdialog.o moc_helpdialog.o moc_graphdialog.o moc_exportdialog.o qrc_gui.o ../libophcrack.a ../samdump2/libsamdump2.a -L/usr/lib -lm -lssl -lcrypto -lqwt -lQtGui -lQtCore -lpthread -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291840.n4TIeTvD031938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 14:40:28 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: agedu Short Description: An utility for tracking down wasted disk space Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291843.n4TIhZoO032477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-29 14:43:33 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 18:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291856.n4TIuMK9002719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #15 from Dan Fuhry 2009-05-29 14:56:20 EDT --- I don't think you really understood what I was communicating. What I mean by that statement is as follows. User input is, of course, always sanitized. I'm not an idiot. What I mean is that Enano checks values that are already "trusted" (pulled from the database, or sent through validation already) a second time before sending them to third party libraries, so that any potentially unsafe input is eliminated before it could possibly touch 3rd-party code. If you have, for example, an XSS vulnerability that can be exploited through MediaWiki's table code, we fix Enano's preprocessor to filter it out, instead of fixing MediaWiki's table code. To the outside world at large, the vulnerability is still closed; we just are extra careful to make sure trouble doesn't ever reach the vulnerable code. I know this is controversial because it seems like a band-aid or hackish solution instead of fixing the underlying problem. That's true in a sense. Anybody that writes Enano plugins is going to read the API documentation and see that the correct way to sanitize text is with RenderMan::preprocess_text(), and the correct way to render it is RenderMan::render(), and that stuff like MediaWiki's table code is considered a private API. If developers avoid using private APIs, there won't ever be a security concern with regards to 3rd-party libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:08:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:08:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503237] New: Review Request: globalmenu - A global menu for GTK2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: globalmenu - A global menu for GTK2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503237 Summary: Review Request: globalmenu - A global menu for GTK2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://gr33nn1nj4.com/rpms/globalmenu.spec SRPM URL: http://gr33nn1nj4.com/rpms/globalmenu-0.7.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Adds global menu support for GTK2 apps. For compatibility issues see http://code.google.com/p/gnome2-globalmenu/wiki/ApplicationCompatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:26:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:26:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291926.n4TJQKHJ008784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #9 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 15:26:18 EDT --- I really think this package should Require gnome-session, especially as it's just for directory ownership. In this case duplicate ownership is perfectly ok as none of the packages really requires the other. If ths package required gnome-session we will have a *lot* of Gnome bits (GConf2, control-center, gnome-desktop, gnome-icon-theme, gnome-menus and their deps) on every livecd that contains a system-config tool or requies polkit-gnome somehow. Please reconsider this requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:23:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:23:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291923.n4TJN50I008172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #8 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-29 15:23:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > There is a subtlety here. I first thought of doing it that way but then I > realized that it would be problematic on x86_64. On x86_64, when someone > installs dssi-vst, the > dssi-vst.x86_64 > dssi-vst-wine.i586 > packages will be installed. If I put a > Requires: dssi > on the dssi-vst-wine package, it will pull dssi.x86_64 during installation, and > dssi.x86_64 does not own /usr/lib/dssi. The only solution I found was to own > /usr/lib/dssi by dssi-vst-wine.i586 so that we have all directories owned in > all archs. > > Please let me know if you find a better solution. I see your point here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291928.n4TJS5QB008901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com --- Comment #34 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 15:28:03 EDT --- *** Bug 503237 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503237] Review Request: globalmenu - A global menu for GTK2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291928.n4TJS4Aj008828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503237 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 15:28:02 EDT --- Sorry, but this was already submitted and is closed to finished. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480279 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:32:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:32:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291932.n4TJWDJO010067@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Wilmer Jaramillo M. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wilmer at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #9 from Wilmer Jaramillo M. 2009-05-29 15:32:12 EDT --- This should be the faster review approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291937.n4TJbZEP010660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 15:37:34 EDT --- globus-io-6.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-io-6.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:37:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:37:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291937.n4TJbiA6010726@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 15:37:44 EDT --- globus-io-6.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-io-6.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291937.n4TJbepv010695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 15:37:39 EDT --- globus-io-6.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-io-6.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 19:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 15:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905291939.n4TJdFO8011220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-05-29 15:39:13 EDT --- What I'm communicating is that sanitising user input is only one part of security and it doesn't form a complete argument for why bundling libraries would be okay. If you didn't bundle your libraries, you'd still pass the data through the Enano preprocessor before handing off to the third party libraries, right? So there's no security advantage to bundling. But the security advantage to unbundled libraries is that if there's a security flaw in an unbundled library, we can address that by updating a single package. If there's a security flaw and enano, drupal, phpnuke, and wordpress all have that library bundled, then we have to find that the library exists in each of those packages, backport the fix to each of the versions each of those apps is bundling, make it work with the local modifications that you may have applied, rebuild all of those packages, and release new versions of all of those packages with a security announcement for each of those packages which our users then have to download and install on their machines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503148] Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292009.n4TK9g6F016421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503148 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 16:09:40 EDT --- Some initial notes: - Is the target platform stuff really necessary? Doesn't a simple %{cmake_kde4} make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags} do the job? - You don't need to use %setup -q -n %{name}-%{version} a simple %setup -q will do. - You probably don't need to mkdir %{buildroot} as this should be automatically done by make install. - You must install the desktop file as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files - You must handle locale files as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files - You need to Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership. - You need to update icon cache as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache - Explicit requires of libraries (qca2) is not allowed http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - %{_kde4_appsdir}/kmess/icons/hicolor/*/apps/gnomemeeting.png doesn't look correct. - You're missing the source URL, ref http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292014.n4TKErC6017418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:12:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:12:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292012.n4TKCs7Z017192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 16:12:53 EDT --- - Don't use %{summary}. as description for the libs package. Use something along the lines of the description of the devel package instead. - Is the target platform stuff really necessary? Won't a simple %{cmake_kde4} make VERBOSE=1 %{?_smp_mflags} do? - Devel package should probably Requires: %{name}-libs = %{version}-%{release} instead of Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - Libs should not Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Is there even a need to have a separate package for the library? I'd put them in the main package. - Devel package must own %{_includedir}/csync/ instead of %{_includedir}/csync/* otherwise it will not own the directory. - Main package must own %dir %{_sysconfdir}/csync/ as it places files in that directory -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503021] Review Request: pony - a simple image manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292023.n4TKNlVG019064@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503021 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Kushal Das 2009-05-29 16:23:46 EDT --- cvs imported -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:25:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:25:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292025.n4TKPC6K019833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 16:25:11 EDT --- - Package must Requires: yelp for dir ownership. - Package must own %{_datadir}/%{name}/ instead of %{_datadir}/%{name}/glade/%{name}.ui - Is having the icon in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/%{name}.png really purposeful? As there is just one icon I'd put it in %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}.png Then you wouldn't need the icon cache updates, and wouldn't also need to add the missing Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership. - I'd nag about using macros for standard commands, but they're still allowed. ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is GPLv3+ not GPLv3, check src/MainWindow.vala MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Time stamps are not preserved, use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - See comments above. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK - Although README is empty for now, you might want to add a [ -s README ] && exit 1 in the setup phase so you'll notice if it acquires content. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292039.n4TKdqU9022657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #35 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 16:39:48 EDT --- Sorry it took so long, but I'm still not happy with the spec. It was ok to drop the gtk-module package, but IMO the -common package should remain to avoid confusion. Otherwise people install gnome-globalmenu and wonder why the don't have a panel applet. If you renamed the base package to gnome-globalmenu-common you could make the gnome-applet-globalmenu provide gnome-applet-globalmenu for easy installation with yum. I have moved the gconf schema to the gnome-applet package and the xfce plugin still works nice. So why wait for a new release to move the file? Use %global instead of %define, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define Requires(pre|post|preun): GConf2 and the GConf scriptlets are in the base package, but they belong to the gnome-applet package. Only ldconfig will remain in the base package. You could replace it with "%post -p /sbin/ldconfig" and drop the Requires(post|postun) for ldconfig, rpm will take care of this. Of course it needs to be "%post -p common /sbin/ldconfig" if you renamed the base package. The conditionals are bad. You only want to build the xfce plugin in Fedora. So you better use "%if 0%{?fedora}" configure can be more simplified to %configure --disable-schemas-install \ --disable-static \ --disable-tests \ --with-gnome-panel \ --docdir=%{pkgdocdir} \ %if 0%{?fedora} --with-xfce4-panel %else --without-xfce4-panel %endif -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:45:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:45:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292045.n4TKj5fi022937@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #36 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 16:45:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=345959) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=345959) Patch to incorporate all suggestions I made in comment #35 I have also reworked the descriptions a little so that the correct texts for each subpackage gets displayed in the package-manager. Take a look at the patch to see what I have in mind. You don't need to apply it to your spec, but take what you like. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:57:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:57:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503148] Review Request: kmess - a msn messenger for kde In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292057.n4TKv02t025861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503148 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-29 16:56:59 EDT --- Is this your first package? It should have said so in the review request. Also, I see you have applied for packager group membership. You need a sponsor, which also should have been in the review request and the blocker bug FE-NEEDSPONSOR should have been set. If you do not have a sponsor yet I am willing to sponsor you if you convince me you know the Fedora Packaging guidelines (which, obviously, you don't - at the moment - judging from the amount of problems in the spec file). You will need to submit at least one another package for review, and perform initial reviews of packages of other people. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 20:59:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 16:59:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292059.n4TKxRGT026099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 Igor Juri?kovi? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |juriskovic.igor at gmail.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292100.n4TL0fKc025704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 17:00:39 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:00:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:00:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292100.n4TL0kqr025746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 17:00:45 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292150.n4TLonX3002463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #8 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-05-29 17:50:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) Thanks for the review. I have been on a short holiday, hence the delay in responding I believe I have now fixed all your comments: > For -2: > > * tarball > - Tarball in your srpm does not match which can be downloaded > from the URL written as %SOURCE0: > Ok, fixed this. Released 0.5.4 upstream and used that to make the new spec file > * Macros > - Please use macros for standard directories. > /usr should be either %_prefix or %_exec_prefix: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/RPMMacros > Done > * %defattr > - Now we recommend %defattr(-,root,root,-) > Done > * Directory ownership issue > - %_exec_prefix/lib/cups/backend (defined as %cups_backend_dir) > is already owned by cups rpm and this package should > not own this directory itself > ! Note that > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > %files > %{cups_backend_dir} > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > contains all files/directories under %cups_backend_dir and > the directory %cups_backend_dir itself > As this directory is owned by cups (and currently this > package Requires cups-libs but not cups), add > "Requires: cups" to resolve directory ownership issue. > Thanks, completely missed this. Fixed! > * Documents > - As Igor pointed out on the comment 6, "INSTALL" file > is not likely to be needed. > Done, INSTALL removed > * %changelog > - And modify %changelog entry Done New versions available: Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:57:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292157.n4TLvMar003497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Zach Oglesby 2009-05-29 17:57:21 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:55:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292155.n4TLt1ti001855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Zach Oglesby 2009-05-29 17:55:00 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar-0.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 21:58:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:58:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292158.n4TLwdpQ002571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oglesbyzm at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Zach Oglesby 2009-05-29 17:58:38 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string.spec This is my first time trying to package so let me know if anything needs fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 22:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] New: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Status Whiteboard: NotReady Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oglesbyzm at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, fedora-haskell-list at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 426750 Spec URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify.spec SRPM URL: http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library provides a wrapper to the Linux Kernel's inotify feature,allowing applications to subscribe to notifications when a file is accessed or modified. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 22:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 18:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292204.n4TM43k0004874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |ghc-utf8-string - Support |ghc-hinotify - Haskell |reading and writing UTF8 |binding to INotify |Strings | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 23:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 19:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905292309.n4TN967c013350@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-29 19:09:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I really think this package should Require gnome-session, ^ Sorry, the word NOT was missing here. Some more comments: - License tag is wrong, should be LGPLv2+ instead of LGPLv2 - Why does %configure check for GConf? - "BuildRequires: gnome-doc-utils" seems wrong to me, AFAIKS only gtkdoc-check from gtk-doc is needed. - What is the use of " --enable-gtk-doc" if there are no docs? - package does not use parallel make, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make - Timestamps not preserved during make install, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - This is the successor of PolicyKit-gnome, but the Provides and Obsoletes for it are missing. - HACKING and TODO are missing from %doc, possibly also NEWS, but this one is very outdated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri May 29 23:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 19:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] New: Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 Summary: Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/freepv/freepv.spec SRPM URL: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/freepv/freepv-0.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This rpm includes two patches from upstream SVN, one for gcc-4.4.0 compilation and another to build the library dynamically. FreePV is a viewer for QuickTimeVR (QTVR), SPiV, cylindrical, cubic and cylindrical panoramas. The package provides a standalone panorama viewer. Install the freepv-plugin package for a Firefox/Mozilla plugin. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 00:42:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 20:42:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439627] Review Request: gluegen - Java/JNI glue code generator to call out to ANSI C In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300042.n4U0gpbN001225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439627 --- Comment #27 from D Haley 2009-05-29 20:42:50 EDT --- I think you might be looking at this from a slightly different perspective. If we want jogl to build, we need to modify the jogl build system to decouple it from gluegen. Jogl itself will work with gluegen *once built* -- its a matter of tricking ant to do what we need. I had a shot at this a while back, and was able to decouple it, but some java errors I introduced caused some problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 00:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 20:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300058.n4U0wi8M004694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 Hal Finkel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |half at halssoftware.com --- Comment #28 from Hal Finkel 2009-05-29 20:58:38 EDT --- It seems that the licensing issues apply only to the TAO packages. Could progress be made on ACE itself while we wait on the TAO licensing fixes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 01:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 21:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300114.n4U1Er7Q003609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #29 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-29 21:14:52 EDT --- Well, I am not sure which part is ACE or TAO and I have almost forgotton which files need license fixing. However based from my comment 19, it seems that "ACE part" is legally free. So if you can remove TAO related part (from the source tarball itself) completely and package it into rpm style, I can recheck it if it can be allowed on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:07:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:07:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300207.n4U27AFW021182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |henriquecsj at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior 2009-05-29 22:07:08 EDT --- Hello, Haley, Using this srpm for a test I was able to build the RPM for cpptasks, but things seems to have been quiet around here. Does the problems still persist? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300206.n4U26I2R021121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #11 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-29 22:06:17 EDT --- - Why does %configure check for GConf? Because it does. Remember, this is a git snapshot, so don't expect perfect polish. - "BuildRequires: gnome-doc-utils" seems wrong to me, AFAIKS only gtkdoc-check from gtk-doc is needed. Well, thats what you think. Had you tried to build in mock, like I did, you'd see that gnome-doc-utils is needed for the build to succeed. - This is the successor of PolicyKit-gnome, but the Provides and Obsoletes for it are missing. You want us to break rawhide until all the porting is done ? Really ? - HACKING and TODO are missing from %doc, possibly also NEWS, but this one is very outdated Both of these are not useful at all in a non-devel package, I'd say. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] New: gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Summary: gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gareth.l.john at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora FILES: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.log ------------------------------------------------ DESCRIPTION: High level utility functions, classes and widgets written on top of gtkmm and glibmm. * logging framework * option parsing, date and string utilities * tile widgets (see a Paperbox screenshot) * dialog helpers The package consists of two shared libraries which will be installed to your pkg-config path, glibmm-utils and gtkmm-utils. Gtkmm is the official C++ API for GTK+, a graphical user interface toolkit used in the GNOME desktop. glibmm is a C++ API for GLib. ------------------------------------------------ RPMLINT SAYS: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.i386.rpm gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 gtkmm-utils.i386: E: invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.la (line 17) gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 gtkmm-utils.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/home/gaza/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.i386//usr/lib'] gtkmm-utils.i386: E: invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.la (line 35) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-1.i386.rpm gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: no-version-dependency-on gtkmm-utils/gtkmm-utils-libs/libgtkmm-utils 0.4.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.src.rpm gtkmm-utils.src:19: W: hardcoded-packager-tag %packager gtkmm-utils.src:47: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. With regards to "gtkmm-utils.src:47: W: configure-without-libdir-spec" i tried the suggestion from rpmlint -i and it broke the build so left it out. Re, "gtkmm-utils.i386: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/home/gaza/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.i386//usr/lib'] gtkmm-utils.i386: E: invalid-directory-reference /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.la (line 35)" these errors have only just appeard and were never there before and i am clueless as to why they have turned up i have probably done over 20 builds ironing out the previous errors and these just turned up?? However rpmlint -i had a suggestion for rpath which did not break the build but did not solve the problem either. Re, "unstripped-binary-or-object" i know that to fix this i need to chmod the files in question to be executable however when i tried to slot this in under any headers had no luck again breaking the build. Having consulted the web this was the only answer i found with no guidance on where to put them and my guess work did not serve me well either. so again no joy here. I have also included a limited worklog in files to show my thought process and fixes anything that worked i have left off as it is not an issue i hope so it is a list of my issues although the dependencies listed on there have all been added and some removed due to explicit dependency error! I look forward to any guidance on the two or three problems that evade me, however many of them I hope to solve with a little more google time! ------------------------------------------------------------ I hope its not too shabby I have improved on as many errors as possible with google and some knowledge and some guess work. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300227.n4U2Rcn5026373@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:27:37 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300227.n4U2ROpf026304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:27:23 EDT --- RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300228.n4U2SKM6021744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 |0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:29:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:29:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300229.n4U2TXOG022264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc9 |0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300227.n4U2RUkp021504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300229.n4U2TOL4022203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:29:23 EDT --- R-BSgenome-1.12.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-BSgenome'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5661 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300229.n4U2TdFg027105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:29:38 EDT --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300228.n4U2SFkE026644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:28:14 EDT --- RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300230.n4U2Ub6t027745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:30:37 EDT --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491578] Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300229.n4U2TSt8027044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:29:28 EDT --- RasmusDSP-0.1-2.20090321cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300232.n4U2W6Ck028251@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:32:05 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300229.n4U2Th3M027150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300227.n4U2Rhut026447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.93-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:30:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:30:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300230.n4U2Umrw027816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:30:47 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update guitarix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5671 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300227.n4U2RsJP026512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:27:51 EDT --- python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sippy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5653 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300228.n4U2SRof026754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:28:26 EDT --- openttd-opengfx-0-0.4.alpha4.2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openttd-opengfx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5657 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300232.n4U2WJl9023787@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:32:18 EDT --- libirman-0.4.5-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300233.n4U2X43C024098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:33:03 EDT --- me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300230.n4U2UE6X023036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:30:12 EDT --- me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:30:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:30:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300230.n4U2Ufjj023201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc9 |0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300232.n4U2WA0c023730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.93-3.fc10 |1.93-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300230.n4U2UItE023085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.8.12-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300232.n4U2WOIt023843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.5-3.fc10 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300236.n4U2aJhJ030420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:36:18 EDT --- tritonus-0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300235.n4U2Z3Pt029839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.5-3.fc10 |0.4.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300236.n4U2a3cC030321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:36:01 EDT --- me-tv-0.8.12-5.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300233.n4U2X9KH028909@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.12-5.fc11 |0.8.12-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:36:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:36:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300236.n4U2abob030501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:36:36 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update guitarix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5699 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300235.n4U2Zj1d030189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:35:44 EDT --- R-BSgenome-1.12.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-BSgenome'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5694 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474992] Review Request: libirman - Library for IRMAN hardware In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300234.n4U2Yvts024655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474992 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:34:57 EDT --- libirman-0.4.5-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496525] Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300236.n4U2aOiZ025881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc10 |0.3.7-0.3.20090419cvs.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:36:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:36:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500926] Review Request: me-tv - GNOME desktop application for watching digital television In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300236.n4U2aA8s025791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.12-5.fc10 |0.8.12-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491519] Review Request: openttd-opengfx - OpenGFX replacement graphics for OpenTTD In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300235.n4U2Zu6q025395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491519 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:35:55 EDT --- openttd-opengfx-0-0.4.alpha4.2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openttd-opengfx'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5696 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:35:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:35:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300235.n4U2ZSss025124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:35:27 EDT --- python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-sippy'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5692 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:39:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:39:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300239.n4U2di9m031803@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:39:43 EDT --- bibtex2html-1.93-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:39:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:39:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300239.n4U2dHFK031727@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-29 22:39:16 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update guitarix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5707 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 02:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 22:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490576] Review Request: bibtex2html - Collection of tools for translating from BibTeX to HTML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300239.n4U2dm91026913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490576 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.93-3.fc9 |1.93-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 03:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 23:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300314.n4U3EDPn001519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #30 from Hal Finkel 2009-05-29 23:14:11 EDT --- Looking at the Debian copyright file, there seem to be only three files in ACE proper which could be problematic. ACE_wrappers/ace/OS_NS_wchar.cpp - This has a 4-clause BSD license with copyright belonging to the The Regents of the University of California. The advertising clause, however, may have been "deleted", and, if so, this file should be updated (ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change). ACE_wrappers/ace/Get_Opt.cpp - This has a 4-clause BSD license with copyrights belonging to he Regents of the University of California and to The NetBSD Foundation, Inc. The NetBSD license, may have been changed to the 2-clause version, and, if so, this file should be updated (http://www.netbsd.org/about/redistribution.html#why2clause). ACE_wrappers/ace/UTF*_Encoding_Converter.* - These have a license from Unicode, Inc. which, in part, reads, "Unicode, Inc. hereby grants the right to freely use the information supplied in this file in the creation of products supporting the Unicode Standard, and to make copies of this file in any form for internal or external distribution as long as this notice remains attached." This restriction on use may render the files non-free. Fortunately, replacing them should not be difficult. The TAO components can be removed. In fact, source packages of only ACE (no TAO, etc.) are released as part of the normal upstream release cycle (see: http://download.dre.vanderbilt.edu/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 06:55:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 02:55:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300655.n4U6tD8M008560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-05-30 02:55:12 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is ok php-ezc-Webdav.src: I: checking php-ezc-Webdav.noarch: I: checking 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. + package name ok + spec file name ok + package meet the PHP Guidelines (new update) + License ok : BSD + License is upstream + spec in english and legible + license file in sources is provided + sources match the upstream sources b97a4d88771171bbeba466837be97e4c Webdav-1.1.tgz + Source URL ok + build on F11.x86_64 + BuildRequires (php-pear >= 1:1.4.9-1.2, php-channel(components.ez.no)) ok + no locale + no .so + own all directories that it creates + no duplicate file + %defattr ok + %clean section ~ use macros consistently + contain code + small documentation not required to run + no devel + no pkgconfig + no sub-package + no GUI + don't own files or directories already owned by other packages + %install start with rm -rf + valid UTF-8 + build in mock (fedora-rawhide-x86_64) + no test suite + scriptlets ok ~ Final Requires ok /usr/bin/pear php-common >= 5.2.1 php-pear(components.ez.no/Base) >= 1.6 php-xml + Final Provides ok php-pear(components.ez.no/Webdav) = 1.1 php-ezc-Webdav = 1.1-1.fc8 Notes: Should use %global rather than %define As reported by pci, this need mime_magic. ezcWebdavFileBackend::getMimeType, can use fileinfo (first) or mime_magic (second, but not available) or a DAV property or a default value. So, Should requires Fileinfo extension. "grep -r hasExtensionSupport /usr/share/pear/ezc/Webdav" doesn't report other optional extension No blocker, so ======== APPROVED ======== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 07:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 03:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300725.n4U7Piho013990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-05-30 03:25:43 EDT --- As for Tk-Stderr, license is ambiguous. - web page says Unknown - man page says "same terms as Perl" - spec says GLPv2 Should probably be "GPLv2+ or Artistic" Can you ask upstream for clarification ? I always prefer more precise %file (this improves change detection in update, for ex: %{perl_vendorlib}/Tk %{_mandir}/man3/Tk*.3* You %define _xvfb (better be %global) but I don't where you need it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 07:28:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 03:28:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] New: Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Summary: Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/xsynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Xsynth-DSSI is a classic-analog (VCOs-VCF-VCA) style software synthesizer which operates as a plugin for the DSSI Soft Synth Interface. DSSI is a plugin API for software instruments (soft synths) with user interfaces, permitting them to be hosted in-process by audio applications. rpmlint W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/xsynth-dssi jack-dssi-host can be ignored since the package requires dssi koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1384488 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 09:56:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 05:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905300956.n4U9ux9f017241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 05:56:57 EDT --- This looks like a package that's probably covered with patents, since it's related with QuickTime. Can we get an opinion from legal? (Blocking FE-LEGAL). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301006.n4UA6xOi014519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 06:06:58 EDT --- - Don't define %{name}, %{version}, %{release}, %{prefix} or %{packager}. The first four are atomatic (%{name} is what is in the Name: field and so on) and the last is not used in Fedora. - You're missing the source URL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL - Drop the Requires: lines altogether, ref. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires The requires are picked up automatically by RPM (except for pkgconfig which you have to require explicitly for dir ownership). - Drop the BuildArch line. - Summary doesn't seem right. - BuildRoot is obsolete, use http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag - %prep shouldn't have an argument - %setup should have argument -q - No checking if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ]; then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi is used in Fedora. Also, you need to remove it in %install, not in %build. - Why do you delete the header files??? These should go to a -devel subpackage. - Post and postun should be just %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - Remove .la files at end of install find %{buildroot} -name *.la -delete - Use %{_libdir} instead of %{_prefix}/lib. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:10:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:10:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301010.n4UAAQKA020417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301008.n4UA8XaP019771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 06:08:32 EDT --- Ugh. The spec file is so shabby that I'd start anew with a good spec file template. Install the rpmdevtools package and start with $ rpmdev-newspec library that should give you a good starting point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:10:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:10:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301010.n4UAAwdH020478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|gtkmm-utils & |Review Request: gtkmm-utils |gtkmm-utils-devel, library |& gtkmm-utils-devel, |used by paperbox. |library used by paperbox. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:10:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] gtkmm-utils & gtkmm-utils-devel, library used by paperbox. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301010.n4UAAAxw015250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 06:10:10 EDT --- - Also, you need to use %configure instead of CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" ./configure --prefix=%{prefix} Just rewrite the spec file with the template, OK? And read the packaging guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:12:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:12:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301012.n4UAC8N4015581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gtkmm-utils |Review Request: gtkmm-utils |& gtkmm-utils-devel, |- C++ utility and widget |library used by paperbox. |library based on glibmm and | |gtkmm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503252] Review Request: freepv - Immersive panorama viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301015.n4UAFtP1021421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503252 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Postle 2009-05-30 06:15:54 EDT --- Hi the QuickTime .mov container format is openly documented, the problem with patents is related to video codecs such as Sorenson and MPEG. QTVR isn't video, it is just JPEG compressed images wrapped up in a .mov container. FreePV doesn't implement any codecs, it uses libjpeg for decoding the data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301039.n4UAd1Ch020932@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-30 06:39:00 EDT --- rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:38:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:38:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301038.n4UAc845020857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-05-30 06:38:07 EDT --- rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:40:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:40:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301040.n4UAexjB026618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Robert Scheck 2009-05-30 06:40:58 EDT --- Package: rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Package: rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete 2426 (rubygem-mongrel_cluster): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 10:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 06:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301054.n4UAsSGp028500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-30 06:54:27 EDT --- Changes: - add req. on yelp - fix dir ownership Moving icon did not work. spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/moserial/moserial.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/moserial/moserial-2.26.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 11:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 07:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301126.n4UBQS8T028641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 07:26:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Changes: > > - add req. on yelp > - fix dir ownership > > Moving icon did not work. Where did it fail? Please, fix also the issues raised in the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 11:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 07:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301147.n4UBlH0a005168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 --- Comment #4 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-30 07:47:16 EDT --- Sorry, the menu did find the icon, however the window manager (metacity) did not find it, given a less than perfect result. Seems like I was confused by the layout, I believed you created a summary of the problems in the top section. Now I see there are more issues. Updated package will follow soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 12:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478744] Review Request: wmfire - WindowMaker dock app that displays cpu, memory or network load as flames In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301223.n4UCN7Kt011009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478744 --- Comment #3 from steve 2009-05-30 08:23:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > A few points here: > > 1. Go through the spec and use macros consistently. Specifically, %{name}, > %{version}. Done. > 2. Look at the license tag. Re-read: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#GPL_and_LGPL > (hint: look at the source code) > Done. Added the correct license tag (GPLv2+) to the spec file. > 3. Look at the Requires that rpm finds automatically. If it finds > libgtop-2.0.so.7() as a Requires, you don't need to explicitly list it as a > Requires. > Done. > 4. Instead of wildcarding so aggressively for a single binary and manpage, why > not be more specific? > Done. I've also checked both the spec file and rpm with rpmlint and received no errors. > I'll do a more complete review when I see a new SRPM/SPEC. Thanks for your time. The latest spec and rpm are at: http://lonetwin.net/wmfire.spec http://lonetwin.net/wmfire-1.2.3-2.fc10.src.rpm cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 12:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226321] Merge Review: psgml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301232.n4UCWlLo012889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226321 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-30 08:32:46 EDT --- This is one of the worst specs I have ever seen, so I decided to review this. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 12:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301246.n4UCkbM9015108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-30 08:46:36 EDT --- I just don't feel like deciding about this. The question I have is whether the author would object to inclusion of dansguardian in RHEL (if that ever happens). RHEL is freely distributable (and of course there is CentOS), but Red Hat charges for support, so the limitations on his page http://dansguardian.org/?page=copyright2 are unequivocal. Probably best would be get the author's statement on the issue. Blocking FE-LEGAL again and posting question to fedora-legal. Aside from this issue this package is OK, and it would be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 12:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301248.n4UCmrgZ009653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl 2009-05-30 08:48:52 EDT --- And of course if you write the email to the auhor, please, do mention existence of ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/linux/enterprise/ (complete src.rpm files of RHEL). He may not know about it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 12:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 08:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301246.n4UCkCGa009438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #4 from Gareth John 2009-05-30 08:46:11 EDT --- OK thanks jussilehtola, i've made a new spec it looks ok with only two errors in the resulting rpm. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. All other files devel.rpm and src.rpm have no errors from rpmlint. I have used the line %attr(755, root, root)%{_libdir}/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 and after reading the guidance on files that need to be executable i had no answers it just gave a default attributes example. I have tried without specific file attributes and the error still occurs the new files can be found: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.fc10.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 14:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:33:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301433.n4UEXLVY001258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 10:33:20 EDT --- You didn't address the issues I raised. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 14:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301442.n4UEg2cw030073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(caillon at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 15:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301503.n4UF3xoJ002446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #10 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-05-30 11:03:58 EDT --- Jan, did you had time to take a look ? The new version seems to work nicely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 15:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226321] Merge Review: psgml In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301506.n4UF6UPC003295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226321 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-30 11:06:28 EDT --- First, let's go through the spec step by step: Summary: No dot at the end please name: Capital letter at the beginning Prereq: should not be used, I doubt it really is one. sgml-common is a Requires and BuildRequires. Is the license tag really correct? I could not find anything in the sources. URL tag is missing BuildRoot: is invalid, should be %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Prefix: /usr: drop this completely. Will be set automatically and using absolute paths is strictly forbidden Requires: emacs is missing %define psgmldir %{prefix}/share/emacs/site-lisp/psgml/: use %global, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define %{prefix}/share/ should be %{_datadir} here %description: line breaks at 80 characters %build: PATH=/usr/bin:$PATH this is most likely unnecessary ./configure --prefix=/usr: Hardcoded paths are strictly forbidden, just use %configure here. Use parallel make if possible. If not, write a comment, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Parallel_make During build I see a lot of errors like this one: Warning: !! The file uses old-style backquotes !! This functionality has been obsolete for more than 10 years already and will be removed soon. See (elisp)Backquote in the manual. Please look into this. %install: When creating psgml-init.el you should also use macros, %{psgmldir} instead of /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/psgml, %{_sysconfdir} instead of /etc and so on mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{prefix}/share/sgml/cdtd: use %{_datadir} instead of %{prefix}/share Timestamps are not preserved during install, add INSTALL="install -p" The install-info scriptlets lack the "|| :" at the end of the line and the %postun scriptlet is wrong, should be run in %preun, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Texinfo %files: %defattr should be (-,root,root,-) %{prefix}/share/sgml/cdtd should be %{_datadir}/sgml/cdtd ChangeLog and psgml.texi are missing from %doc ChangeLog, psgml.texi and psgml.info.gz are not UTF-8, please convert them as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackagingTricks#Convert_encoding_to_UTF-8 Now the full checklist. All FIX or ??? items are explained above. FIX - MUST: rpmlint $ rpmlint noarch/psgml-1.2.5-9.fc12.noarch.rpm psgml.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A GNU Emacs major mode for editing SGML documents. psgml.noarch: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog psgml.noarch: W: no-url-tag psgml.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/info/psgml.info.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. FIX - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. ??? - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. FIX - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 d4f346b0242035e54860b29d7466b0a2 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 (noarch) N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. FIX - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: ??? - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. FIX - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 15:33:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 11:33:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301533.n4UFXeRg009278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-30 11:33:39 EDT --- By the way, - Please change the release number every time you modify your spec/srpm to modify your spec file/srpm to avoid confusion. (In reply to comment #4) > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm > gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 - Would you check if you have surely redhat-rpm-config installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 16:06:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:06:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301606.n4UG64EJ022126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 --- Comment #5 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-30 12:06:03 EDT --- Here we go: - add req. on yelp and hicolor-icon-theme - fix dir ownership - fix license - preserve timestamps - detect README changes spec: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/moserial/moserial.spec srpm: http://terjeros.fedorapeople.org/moserial/moserial-2.26.1-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 16:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226647] Merge Review: xorg-x11-utils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301622.n4UGMAwt025619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226647 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussilehtola at fedoraproject. | |org --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 12:22:09 EDT --- This package should be broken down into 10/11 packages, one for each util. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 16:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301624.n4UGO7Cu020826@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 12:24:06 EDT --- Everything has been fixed, so the package has been APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 16:24:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:24:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] New: Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Summary: Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/nekobee-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Since it was first released in 2004, the Disposable Soft Synth Interface has allowed Linux audio users to have simple plugin software synthesizers. Over time, the number of these has grown as users and coders have developed new plugins for particular sounds. Now, nekosynth brings some new plugins to enrich your sonic palette. This package provides the nekobee DSSI plugin, which is suitable for recreating those squelchy acid sounds. rpmlint nekobee-dssi.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/nekobee jack-dssi-host can be ignored since the package requires dssi koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1384757 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 16:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 12:31:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301631.n4UGVvfj022733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-30 12:31:56 EDT --- For 0.5.4-1: * cups_backend_dir - Well, according to cups.spec on Fedora %cups_backend_dir is %{_exec_prefix}/lib/cups, not %{_libdir}/cups/backend ( note that on 64 bit architecture, %_exec_prefix is /usr, while %_libdir is /usr/lib64 ) * %setup - "%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}" can be replaced by "%setup -q" Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301731.n4UHVRvt008601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |488174 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488174] Review Request: nimbus-theme-gnome - The Nimbus theme originally from Sun In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301731.n4UHVQQD008563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488174 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:31:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:31:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301731.n4UHVIqd003468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #12 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-05-30 13:31:16 EDT --- The response was : > Obviously I missed that. Because some of the source files are not written by me I can't change their license, so I guess that the more conservative stays - GPLv2. So I think we keep GPLv2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301739.n4UHd1dB004940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-05-30 13:38:59 EDT --- Some notes: * BR - Using "BR: perl" is not preferred. Please specify perl module names needes as BRs more verbosely ( Usually this is "BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) or so ) ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides * noarch vs optflags - This package is noarch so specifying %optflags is useless. * Macros - Use macros correctly. If you want to use %__perl, also use %__make, %__rm * Skipped tests - From build.log: ---------------------------------------------------------- 77 t/01_load.t ... ok 78 t/02_basic.t .. ok 79 t/99_pod.t .... skipped: Enable TEST_POD environment variable to test POD ---------------------------------------------------------- It seems TEST_POD environ should be set and BR: perl(Test::Pod) should be added. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301745.n4UHjTvh006686@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |459065 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459065] Review Request: italc - intelligent teaching and learning with computers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301745.n4UHjSoO006646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459065 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com Blocks| |496433(RussianFedora) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 17:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 13:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301748.n4UHmJ5h007193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #7 from Gareth John 2009-05-30 13:48:18 EDT --- Ok, cheers Mamoru i yum install redhat-rpm-config the -ba again and no errors at all on anything. Jussi, below are the points you gave me below and my action on them. - Removed define %{name}, %{version}, %{release}, %{prefix} or %{packager}. - Removed Packager line - Added direct source URL - Dropped the Requires: lines altogether - Dropped the BuildArch line. - Summary doesn't seem right--I have now changed the summary to read like other summaries that i have found in Fedora repo, i'm not sure if that is what you were getting at but i hope so. - BuildRoot was used as provided by 'rpmdev-newspec library' checked it against requirments and it is on the preference list although is not the top preference - Removed %prep argument - %setup already had a -q argument - No checking if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ]; then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi, i realise i did miss this on my second spec file sorry is now corrected, and is under %install - headers go to a -devel subpackage. - Post and postun should is now just %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig - Added Remove .la files at end of install find %{buildroot} -name *.la -delete - Used %{_libdir} instead of %{_prefix}/lib, also in addition change %prefix/include to %{_includedir} Other points - I installed redhat-rpm-config and did not get any errors or warnings in the resulting rpm - I have made a new spec addressing all of the isues here as far as i am aware and to the best of my knowledge. I have also changed the release to 2 as instructed -I now have a debug.rpm produced which did not happen before am guessing it had something to do with redhat-rpm-config. I am not sure if it is need but have supplied it. ------------------------------------------------------------------ So "third time lucky", my rpmlint output is: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-2.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. FILES..... http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-debuginfo-0.4.0-2.fc10.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 18:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301806.n4UI6b1o016430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 18:06:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301806.n4UI6Jjm016342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 14:06:19 EDT --- Okay, now it looks a world better. Still: - Fix the summary, should be the same one I put as the title of this review request (library for use with paperbox is not a good summary since gtkmm-utils can be used for other things too). - The package should only BuildRequires: gtkmm24-devel glibmm24-devel as the rest of the packages you have listed will be automatically pulled in. (actually gtkmm24-devel pulls in also glibmm24-devel, so basically you need only BR: gtkmm24-devel) - Use %{version} in the Source0 line, this will make updating to new versions easier. - Drop --prefix=%{_prefix} --libdir=%{_libdir} from %configure, since %configure already defines those automatically (you can see it with $ rpm --eval %configure ). - As before, if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ]; then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi should be just rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - Devel package needs to Requires: pkgconfig for dir ownership. - Devel package should own the directories %{_includedir}/glibmm-utils-1.0/ %{_includedir}/gtkmm-utils-1.0/ (you don't have to list the files as this will own everything in those directories). - Don't use %attr lines in %files sections; if you have to change the attributes then do so in %install with chmod. Then you can just include %{_libdir}/*.so.* in %files. - As the devel package requires the main package, there's no need to duplicate the documentation. Drop the %doc line from -devel. (Yes, this creates an rpmlint warning but that can be omitted.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 18:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301827.n4UIRqAs016341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-05-30 14:27:51 EDT --- * Sat May 30 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.02-3 - Implement review feedback from Mamoru Tasaka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888#c2 - Do not own %%{perl_vendorlib}/POE + Component http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl.spec http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl/perl-POE-Component-Log4perl-0.02-3.fc11.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 18:44:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:44:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301844.n4UIi00M019596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #9 from Gareth John 2009-05-30 14:43:59 EDT --- Jussi, i have done everything on the list. However chmod +x and chmod 755 in the install section just gives a permissions error. Without being root im not sure how to fix this problem? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 18:50:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 14:50:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301850.n4UIoBm7025634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek 2009-05-30 14:50:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > 4] vendor/rails contains ruby library files: which have licensing: MIT for > actionmailer, actionpack, activerecord, activeresource, activesupport, GPLv2 > for activemodel actionwebservice is under MIT license, and in your specfile, you don't reflect this. And this applies to other plugins in vendor/plugins directory as well. I'm not sure if actionwebservice and plugins (like coderay) could be shipped in this package, i will find out and let you know. sed -i 's|RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.1.2'|RAILS_GEM_VERSION = '2.1.1'|' %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/config/environment.rb This is not working. Do you need it anyway? when you comment out this line, redmine will use any version which is in system. And if you need it for some reason you should also specify same version in Requires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 19:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301921.n4UJLf4I030330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 --- Comment #2 from Silas Sewell 2009-05-30 15:21:41 EDT --- I'm not sure the correct way to fix this, Koji doesn't create the pyc and pyo files in bindir, but mock still does. The documentation ( https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Unnecessary_Byte_compilation ) recommends using the exclude, but as you've seen this breaks Koji builds. I removed the exclude from the package above, but it will have the unnecessary glob in the files' bindir (ex: %{_bindir}/kernprof.py*) and if you build with mock the .pyc and .pyo files will be in the bindir along with the following warnings. rpmlint [silas at silas rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm python-line_profiler.i386: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/kernprof.pyc 0644 python-line_profiler.i386: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/kernprof.pyo 0644 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. SPEC Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn280&r=280&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-line_profiler/python-line_profiler.spec SRPM URL: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-line_profiler-1.0-0.2.b2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 19:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 15:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905301927.n4UJRpa9026421@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #13 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-30 15:27:50 EDT --- Good. So, can you patch COPYING file with the right license information (GPLv2)? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 20:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302003.n4UK3E72004323@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-30 16:03:13 EDT --- Did you remember to put in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? If you tried chmod 755 %{_libdir}/*.so* this will surely fail, but chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} should work perfectly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 20:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302007.n4UK7GEf005022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Terje R??sten 2009-05-30 16:07:15 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Jussi! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: moserial Short Description: Serial terminal for the gnome desktop Owners: terjeros Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 20:12:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:12:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302012.n4UKC66F005789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #27 from Zarko (grof) 2009-05-30 16:12:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > > This is not really a script. This is just a lirc configuration file, > for using a remote control. OK then. I tested application with my TV/FM card, and works just fine! Please, see with upstream if the next release will be soon. I think that is wise to waiting for release (RC4 is out, so I concluded that the release is close :) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 20:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:37:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302037.n4UKbF8T009688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 478922 depends on bug 467237, which changed state. Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478922 depends on bug 467239, which changed state. Bug 467239 Summary: Review Request: globus-gss-assist - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI Assist library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467239 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-30 16:37:14 EDT --- I reviewed this package and found one minor issue - koji rawhide build is fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385107 * These type of warnings may indicate misbehavior in 64bit systems warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'globus_size_t' Can you patch this up? Swapping %d with %zd will probably solve the issue. - rpmlint globus-ftp-control-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored Otherwise, the package is good to go. Please take care of the above warnings before you commit. ----------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-ftp-control) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 20:46:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 16:46:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302046.n4UKkaCC011194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #10 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-05-30 16:46:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > For 0.5.4-1: > > * cups_backend_dir > - Well, according to cups.spec on Fedora %cups_backend_dir is > %{_exec_prefix}/lib/cups, not %{_libdir}/cups/backend > ( note that on 64 bit architecture, %_exec_prefix is /usr, > while %_libdir is /usr/lib64 ) > corrected. I got misled by the description of the macros on the Wiki. Using the same as what cups does is indeed the bet way. Thanks! > * %setup > - "%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}" can be replaced by > "%setup -q" > Corrected > Then: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > NOTE: Before being sponsored: > > This package will be accepted with another few work. > But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) > must sponsor you. > Thanks for the offer. I will start working on some reviews and/or other packages as soon as possible. I seem to have picked a bad time to apply as packager with first a holiday and now a business trip coming up. But first there is an updated package version available: Spec URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp.spec SRPM URL: http://www.fazant.net/cups-bjnp/cups-bjnp-0.5.4-2.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for your excellent input, guidance and review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 21:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] New: Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 Summary: Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: alekcejk at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/webkitkde/webkitkde.spec SRPM URL: http://nucleo.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/webkitkde/webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: This project aims to integrate WebKit (QtWebKit) into KDE. The project is made up of the following components: - WebKitKDE: The binding between KDE and QtWebKit - WebKitPart: A KPart based on it Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385155 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 21:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302158.n4ULwfjq021175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #1 from nucleo 2009-05-30 17:58:41 EDT --- $ rpmlint webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.src.rpm webkitkde-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitkde-debuginfo-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitkde-devel-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitpart-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.i586.rpm webkitpart-devel-0.0.1-0.1.20090530svn.fc11.i586.rpm 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 22:47:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:47:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] New: Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Summary: Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at postle.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/panoglview/panoglview.spec SRPM URL: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/panoglview/panoglview-0.2.2-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Use panoglview to explore equirectangular panoramic images. Equirectangular panoramas are typically JPEG/TIFF/PNG images with a 2:1 aspect ratio. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 23:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302336.n4UNatoZ002334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 478925 depends on bug 467237, which changed state. Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-30 19:36:54 EDT --- Everything is okay with this one - rpmlint globus-gass-transfer-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385178 ------------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gass-transfer) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 23:45:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:45:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503293] Review Request: webkitkde - QtWebKit bindings to KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302345.n4UNjfd6003798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503293 --- Comment #2 from nucleo 2009-05-30 19:45:40 EDT --- New scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385199 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 23:50:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:50:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302350.n4UNoD8D032510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #1 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-30 19:50:12 EDT --- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/wsdlpull/123/wsdlpull.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/wsdlpull/123/wsdlpull-1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm $ rpmlint -i SPECS/wsdlpull.spec SRPMS/wsdlpull-1.23-1.fc11.src.rpm RPMS/noarch/wsdlpull-doc-1.23-1.fc11.noarch.rpm RPMS/x86_64/wsdlpull-*fc11.x86_64.rpm RPMS/x86_64/wsdlpull-*fc11.i586.rpm 8 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 23:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] New: Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Summary: Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: callea.gaetano.andrea at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/cga/vim-bash-support.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/cga/vim-bash-support-2.11-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Bash Support implements a bash-IDE for Vim/gVim. It is written to considerably speed up writing code in a consistent style. This is done by inserting complete statements comments idioms and code snippets. Syntax checking running a script starting a debugger can be done with a keystroke. There are many additional hints and options which can improve speed and comfort when writing shell scripts. NEW PACKAGER: this is my first package ever. ricky helped me alot. i need a sponsor. the package works for both of us. thank you ricky. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat May 30 23:56:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 19:56:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905302356.n4UNuM4V005391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rzhou at redhat.com Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 00:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 20:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167525] Review Request: cpptasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310052.n4V0qcPo010377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167525 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-05-30 20:52:36 EDT --- Hello Henrique, This package is awaiting review. A sponsored packager needs to review my proposal for correctness before it can be submitted to the fedora repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 01:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] New: Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 Summary: Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: callea.gaetano.andrea at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/cga/vim-c-support.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/cga/vim-c-support-5.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: C/C++-IDE. Write programs by inserting complete statements comments idioms code snippets templates and comments. Compile link and run one-file-programs without a makefile. See also help file csupport.txt NEW PACKAGER: this is my second rpm. need a sponsor. OTHER PACKAGES: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 01:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503301] New: Review Request: vim-nerdtree - Tree File Browser for VIM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: vim-nerdtree - Tree File Browser for VIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503301 Summary: Review Request: vim-nerdtree - Tree File Browser for VIM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: callea.gaetano.andrea at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/cga/vim-nerdtree.spec SRPM URL: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/cga/vim-nerdtree-3.1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The NERD tree allows you to explore your filesystem and to open files and directories. It presents the filesystem to you in the form of a tree which you manipulate with the keyboard and/or mouse. It also allows you to perform simple filesystem operations. NEW PACKAGER: this is my third. wow i'm on fire tonight :P OTHER PACKAGES: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 01:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 21:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310138.n4V1cBSe023143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 --- Comment #1 from cga 2009-05-30 21:38:10 EDT --- one more to sponsor: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503301 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 03:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 23:05:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310305.n4V35fQC011163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #9 from D Haley 2009-05-30 23:05:39 EDT --- Here is my shot at this. General comments: * givaro-makefile is a makefile and not an executable shell script. Remove the $!/bin/sh from it and move the file into %doc. *Why are the header files split into two sections (gmp++ and %{name})? This may be related to a later point I make about the configure script. * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1]] $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/givaro-3.2.13-2.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/givaro-3.2.13-2.fc10.i386.rpm givaro.spec givaro.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgivaro.so.0.0.2 exit at GLIBC_2.0 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Please inform upstream that it is not a good idea to do this, or patch this out (if possible). Offending file is: src/kernel/zpz/givzpz16table1.C: Line 46. Could be replaced with an exception or some kind of return code propagation. No idea what the easiest solution is. If upstream is informed that they shouldn't do this, and replies with something sensible, I don't see this as a block. * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . As far as I can see it is OK. * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: Please consider adding AUTHORS and ChangeLog (not a blocker) * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. FAIL: URL provided gives 404 error. (The requested URL /CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/givaro-3.2.13.tar.gz was not found on this server.) Please update URL or request upstream to not remove old tarballs. * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK. Was able to compile. * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK. * MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK * MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK * MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK * MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK, no large -doc files * MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK. * MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK * MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK * MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A * MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK * MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK * MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK * MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] OK * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] OK * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] OK * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Koji OK * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Would it be better to patch the -config file to return /usr/include/givaro/ for --cflags rather than /usr/include ? Also it would be good if `givaro-config --cflags --libs` did not return endlines. (add -n to lines 58 and 62, also add leading space to linker & include flags). Finally this may be because of the gmp++ bit? The examples given on the website are a bit bogus -- requires some preprocessor that doesn't exist (404 again). Could you pack a trivial example that compiles into doc directory? * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 03:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 23:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310341.n4V3fEDM013344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #10 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-30 23:41:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > Here is my shot at this. > > General comments: > * givaro-makefile is a makefile and not an executable shell script. Remove the > $!/bin/sh from it and move the file into %doc. Why should we put this in %doc? How is it remotely helpful? > *Why are the header files split into two sections (gmp++ and %{name})? This may > be related to a later point I make about the configure script. gmp++ is C++ bindings for gmp, I think. > * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in > the review.[1]] > > $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/givaro-3.2.13-2.fc10.src.rpm > ../RPMS/i386/givaro-3.2.13-2.fc10.i386.rpm givaro.spec > givaro.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libgivaro.so.0.0.2 > exit at GLIBC_2.0 > 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > > Please inform upstream that it is not a good idea to do this, or patch this > out (if possible). Offending file is: src/kernel/zpz/givzpz16table1.C: Line 46. > Could be replaced with an exception or some kind of return code propagation. No > idea what the easiest solution is. If upstream is informed that they shouldn't > do this, and replies with something sensible, I don't see this as a block. This is poor coding practice by upstream, but it isn't a blocker. > ... > Please consider adding AUTHORS and ChangeLog (not a blocker) Ok (though this is not something I feel strongly about). > ... > * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > FAIL: URL provided gives 404 error. (The requested URL > /CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/givaro-3.2.13.tar.gz was not found on this server.) > Please update URL or request upstream to not remove old tarballs. Again, upstream's fault... > ... > * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A > package should not segfault instead of running, for example. > Would it be better to patch the -config file to return /usr/include/givaro/ > for --cflags rather than /usr/include ? Also it would be good if `givaro-config > --cflags --libs` did not return endlines. (add -n to lines 58 and 62, also add > leading space to linker & include flags). Finally this may be because of the > gmp++ bit? Something like that sounds necessary, yes. > The examples given on the website are a bit bogus -- requires some > preprocessor that doesn't exist (404 again). Could you pack a trivial example > that compiles into doc directory? Sorry, I'm not familiar with the use of this library, I'm just interested in getting SAGE (and dependencies) packaged and in Fedora. > ... Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 04:28:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 00:28:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310428.n4V4Sbux023097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2009-05-31 00:28:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-webflash Short Description: Portable flash messages for WSGI apps Owners: lmacken Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 04:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 00:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310429.n4V4TNLN028029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Luke Macken 2009-05-31 00:29:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-wsgiref Short Description: WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library Owners: lmacken Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 04:41:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 00:41:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310441.n4V4fJ6b026114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2009-05-31 00:41:18 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql.spec * Sat May 30 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0-0.2.rc1 - Update to 1.0rc1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 05:00:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 01:00:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310500.n4V50UUs029536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #11 from D Haley 2009-05-31 01:00:28 EDT --- Some quick replies: > Why should we put this in %doc? How is it remotely helpful? Maybe %doc is not quite the right place, but as far as I can see it is only an example makefile, hence documentation, or similar. It certainly should not be executable, nor should it be mislabelled as a shell script and definitely does not belong in /usr/bin. > This is poor coding practice by upstream, but it isn't a blocker. Still, please try to contact upstream and if they reply put a copy of the relevant reply here. or state that they are non-responsive. I note that te > Again, upstream's fault... This is a blocker. I cannot confirm the md5sum without this, which is required for review - we need to build against an upstream tarball somewhere, and agree on its location. http://www-lmc.imag.fr/CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/Downloads/ may have what we need. >Sorry, I'm not familiar with the use of this library, I'm just interested in >getting SAGE (and dependencies) packaged and in Fedora. I need some way to confirm that the system is working properly -- do you have a suggestion? >gmp++ is C++ bindings for gmp, I think So is this two separate projects bundled into one? I am totally confused. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 05:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 01:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310531.n4V5Vp1f001775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #12 from D Haley 2009-05-31 01:31:50 EDT --- Additional: None of the source files have a proper GPL header, as documented in the GPL licence "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs". Please notify upstream. I am uncertain as to whether this is a blocker or not. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 05:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 01:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310537.n4V5bRiH007232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #14 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-31 01:37:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Additional: > > None of the source files have a proper GPL header, as documented in the GPL > licence "How to Apply These Terms to Your New Programs". Please notify > upstream. I am uncertain as to whether this is a blocker or not. Upstream doesn't have any sort of bugtracking system or email contact I can find (other than directly emailing all six developers). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 05:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 01:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310536.n4V5aiB0007167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #13 from Conrad Meyer 2009-05-31 01:36:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Some quick replies: > > > Why should we put this in %doc? How is it remotely helpful? > Maybe %doc is not quite the right place, but as far as I can see it is only an > example makefile, hence documentation, or similar. It certainly should not be > executable, nor should it be mislabelled as a shell script and definitely does > not belong in /usr/bin. Ah, sorry, didn't realize I was putting it in /usr/bin. I would prefer to not install it anywhere, I think. > > This is poor coding practice by upstream, but it isn't a blocker. > Still, please try to contact upstream and if they reply put a copy of the > relevant reply here. or state that they are non-responsive. I note that te Sorry, I don't see any sort of contact info or bug tracking system on the home page. > > Again, upstream's fault... > This is a blocker. I cannot confirm the md5sum without this, which is required > for review - we need to build against an upstream tarball somewhere, and agree > on its location. http://www-lmc.imag.fr/CASYS/LOGICIELS/givaro/Downloads/ may > have what we need. Eh, it won't be an issue *after* review though. I can update to the most recent tarball and you can verify against that md5sum (or, please, sha1sum). > >Sorry, I'm not familiar with the use of this library, I'm just interested in > >getting SAGE (and dependencies) packaged and in Fedora. > > I need some way to confirm that the system is working properly -- do you have a > suggestion? Maybe look at some of their examples on the webpage? > >gmp++ is C++ bindings for gmp, I think > So is this two separate projects bundled into one? I am totally confused. It's developed by the givaro folks, and they distribute it with givaro. I don't believe it's a library that anyone else is supposed to use (at least not yet). But you can try asking them if you want a better explanation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 06:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 02:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310612.n4V6Cwtv007830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164 --- Comment #31 from Johnny Willemsen 2009-05-31 02:12:55 EDT --- if you have a unified diff for the mentioned files to update, I can commit that to the ACE repository. We are working towards ACE 5.7 which should be released in June -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 06:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 02:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310617.n4V6HLOq008584@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-31 02:17:20 EDT --- Thank you for the review - I'll fix those warnings... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-ftp-control Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 06:17:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 02:17:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310617.n4V6HR0u008622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-05-31 02:17:26 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gass-transfer Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 09:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 05:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497251] Review Request: libstdc++-docs - Documentation in html for libstdc++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310909.n4V99bw8019085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497251 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-05-31 05:09:34 EDT --- *** Bug 451619 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 09:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 05:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475065] Review Request: givaro - C++ library for arithmetic and algebraic computations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310924.n4V9OFhW017327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475065 --- Comment #15 from D Haley 2009-05-31 05:24:14 EDT --- I recommend emailing the three lead devs, probably in the one email. Their addresses are on each of their profile sites. I'm sure they would be happy to help, considering the time it would have taken to write their system. Also their input here would clear up a few matters relatively quickly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 09:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 05:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497525] Review Request: gnome-applet-bubblemon - Bubbling Load Monitoring Applet for the GNOME Panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905310930.n4V9UEZR018725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497525 Edwin ten Brink changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Edwin ten Brink 2009-05-31 05:30:13 EDT --- The package is built successfully for devel and F-11 and has been included in comps.xml. Closing this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 10:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 06:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311037.n4VAbp7U001498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-31 06:37:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > - "BuildRequires: gnome-doc-utils" seems wrong to me, AFAIKS only gtkdoc-check > from gtk-doc is needed. > > Well, thats what you think. Had you tried to build in mock, like I did, you'd > see that gnome-doc-utils is needed for the build to succeed. > > - This is the successor of PolicyKit-gnome, but the Provides and Obsoletes for > it are missing. > > You want us to break rawhide until all the porting is done ? Really ? No, but I want this to be in the spec, even if it's commented out, so the reviewer could verify it is correct. > - HACKING and TODO are missing from %doc, possibly also NEWS, but this one is > very outdated > > Both of these are not useful at all in a non-devel package, I'd say. As long as we have no devel package they should be in the base package I think. The main problem I see is that you rewrote the spec and based your review on the rewrite. This renders the review pretty useless because nobody will realize his own errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 11:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 07:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311112.n4VBCFs1007650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #42 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-31 07:12:11 EDT --- Thanks, Jochen There are rpms available for Fedora here: http://atrpms.net/name/yafaray/ Therefore, anyone willing to test them are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 12:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 08:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311234.n4VCYal8022343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #28 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-31 08:34:35 EDT --- > OK then. I tested application with my TV/FM card, and works just fine! > Good to know. kradio is really nice. You can import preset stations and add image logos for each one of them. > Please, see with upstream if the next release will be soon. > > I think that is wise to waiting for release (RC4 is out, so I concluded that > the release is close :) ) I talked to Ernst Whitte today, and he told me the final version is almost done. Therefore, it is really better to wait a little bit longer. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 13:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311300.n4VD0wp8026368@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |byron at theclarkfamily.name --- Comment #2 from Byron Clark 2009-05-31 09:00:57 EDT --- I started on this package a while ago and just sent my patches upstream last night. If you're interested, here is a version with those patches. It gets rid of all the sed trickery. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl-0.20-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 13:05:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:05:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311305.n4VD5HxL000553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |502614 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 13:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311305.n4VD5Iq6000578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |503336 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 13:05:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:05:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] New: Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Summary: Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: byron at theclarkfamily.name QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter-2.0-3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Configurable text-based feed reader. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 13:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311352.n4VDqDGj007848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #11 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 09:52:12 EDT --- Ok jussi i have done all that you have said plus some more, i also looked in #fedora to see if anyone could help before you had chance to reply and was told that i should include examples in the devel docs. So i tried to do this it took a while as i am rather busy with exams at the minute as well however here is the latest rev. and its changelog. ------------------------------- * Sun May 31 2009 Gareth John gareth.l.john at googlemail.com 0.4.0-3 - Changed summary to recomendation - Changed Build requirments to gtkmm24-devel only - Use name & version macro in the Source0 line - Dropped prefix from configure - Removed checking for remove build root under install - Added pkgconfig as requirement for devel package, for dir ownership. - Dropped the doc line from -devel, as the devel package requires the main package. - Tidy devel files as devel package should own the directories - Tidy package files. - Added chmod commands under install - Removed attr lines under files - Added patch to stop examples compiling - Added examples to devel docs - Added remove makefile from examples under prep -------------------------------- Rpmlint says: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-3.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-3.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- Files: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 13:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 09:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311356.n4VDudn4003273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #12 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 09:56:38 EDT --- Just to explain sorry to leave it off, when inlcuding examples as documentation i followed the example of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Docs/Drafts/BuildingPackagesGuide#Case_Study:_leafpad, i hope that this is the correct way of doing it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311401.n4VE1Y9G004218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Janssen 2009-05-31 10:01:33 EDT --- You started earlier on that. You should maintain it. I just need it for Newsbeuter. So if you're interested to maintain it in Fedora, please take it. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:10:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311410.n4VEAHaC011290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #4 from Byron Clark 2009-05-31 10:10:16 EDT --- I was really only packaging it for newsbeuter, but I would be happy to maintain the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311426.n4VEQ1MG014229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #43 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-05-31 10:26:00 EDT --- Can someone send me a picture of blender to see where the yafaray render option take place... I've never seen this from the whole review... (at least on x86_64). yafaray should be at version 1.0. That a rather common sense that a stable release have matching svn revision, that's very incorrect to have it mentioned talking from a stable release. quoting theses directories: %{_datadir}/blender/scripts/* %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so %{_libdir}/libyafarayplugin.so %{python_sitearch}/_yaf*.so IMO, you should only uses one directory from the script and the _yaf*.so. Again, that was meant to be asked with upstream blender/yafaray. The current package provided above doesn't work at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311427.n4VERv7q008853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-31 10:27:57 EDT --- What's the purpose of the no.example patch? Otherwise it's starting to look quite good. You shouldn't include INSTALL in %doc, however, since it probably contains just instructions for installing from source. Also, use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" to preserve time stamps in install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311437.n4VEbmlI010950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #62 from Simon Wesp 2009-05-31 10:37:39 EDT --- okay, then me only Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: tor New Branches: EL-5 Owners: cassmodiah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311441.n4VEfx6c011953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com --- Comment #1 from D Haley 2009-05-31 10:41:56 EDT --- Its me again. Here are my comments for this package. General comments: * For ease of update, I recommend defining a svnrev macro, then using that where appropriate. * DTD is named in an unusual manner, with version number after .dtd --should this be renamed? *-config script needs correcting to produce appropriate output when called with multiple flags. This is the same problem as for bug 475065 (why is this identical to the other one?) *"# Commented out because it seems broken" - is the check failing, or just not running? Review comments: # MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint -v ghmm.spec ../SRPMS/ghmm-0.7-1.svn2251.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ghmm-0.7-1.svn2251.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ghmm-static-0.7-1.svn2251.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ghmm-devel-0.7-1.svn2251.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ghmm-debuginfo-0.7-1.svn2251.fc10.i386.rpm ghmm.spec:71: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep -e 's|$(PYTHON) setup.py install.*$|$(PYTHON) setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}|' \ ghmm.src: I: checking ghmm.src:71: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %prep -e 's|$(PYTHON) setup.py install.*$|$(PYTHON) setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT}|' \ ghmm.i386: I: checking ghmm.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libghmm.so.1.0.0 exit at GLIBC_2.0 ghmm-static.i386: I: checking ghmm-static.i386: W: no-documentation ghmm-devel.i386: I: checking ghmm-devel.i386: W: no-documentation ghmm-debuginfo.i386: I: checking 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Please notify upstream about the exit() call, and ask for a fix; notification of upstream is required, upstream response is not, although reply should be given here if upstream responds. # MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK # MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK # MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . FAIL : Running my quick and dirty grep (x`grep "any later"` != x"") over the files indicates that the following files don't have an LGPLv2+ boilerplate: Bad: ./ghmmwrapper/ghmmwrapper_wrap.c Bad: ./tests/two_states_three_symbols.c Bad: ./tests/read_fa.c Bad: ./tests/read_smodel.c Bad: ./tests/label_higher_order_test.c Bad: ./tests/randvar_test.c Bad: ./tests/generate_PHI.c Bad: ./tests/shmm_viterbi_test.c Bad: ./tests/chmm_test.c Bad: ./tests/libxml-test.c Bad: ./tests/ghmmunittests.c Bad: ./tests/sequences_old_format.c Bad: ./tests/chmm.c Bad: ./tests/root_finder_test.c Bad: ./tests/test_gsl_ran_gaussian_tail.c Bad: ./tests/sequences_test.c Bad: ./tests/coin_toss_test.c Bad: ./tools/smo2xml.c Bad: ./tools/probdist.c Bad: ./tools/scluster.c Bad: ./tools/smix_hmm.c Bad: ./tools/cluster.c Bad: ./ghmm/mt19937ar.c Bad: ./ghmm/psequence.h Bad: ./ghmm/obsolete.h Bad: ./win_config.h Bad: ./config.h ./ghmm/mt19937ar.c appears to have BSD style licence, and others no licence at all. * Also the copyright file says parts are from the Sun BSD style licence, but no clear relation as to which source files this applies to is given. * The COPYING links to the GPL, which is included but their website says LGPL. This needs to be clarified by upstream. * Requiring the GNU Scientific Library will make the package GPLv3(+?), not LGPL. * Finally the COPYING file must be bundled into %doc as this is the user "recieving" a copy of the LGPL/GPL (additional to COPYRIGHT.txt). This will all need to be fixed. At the very least you need to change the licence field, as the licences are mixed. You should notify upstream about this so they can relicence, and/or fix the missing licences. # MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. FAIL: see above # MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. FAIL: see above # MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK # MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK # MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this pacKoji OKkage, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. FAIL: $ svn export -r2251 https://ghmm.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/ghmm/trunk/ghmm ghmm $ tar -cjf ghmm.tar.bz2 ghmm/ $ md5sum ghmm.tar.bz2 5a410a91489785811535622a89bd25ab ghmm.tar.bz2 $ md5sum ../ghmm.tar.bz2 00c08b65e71b51e63b2922ea9ce4883b ../ghmm.tar.bz2 Could not reproduce MD5 included in SRPM. Please check and advise of correct MD5. Also, please provide exact SVN (including rev number) command for a current checkout, so md5 can match if someone executes the suggested command. # MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Koji OK. # MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. N/A # MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK # MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A # MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK # MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. N/A # MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK # MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. FAIL: please fix # MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK # MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK, but I strongly recommend defining an svn version number macro # MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK, pending licence clarification. # MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK # MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. OK # MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK # MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK # MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). N/A # MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK # MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK # MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. OK # MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. N/A # MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK # MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK # MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. FAIL: See earlier licence problems * SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. N/A * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Koji OK * SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. FAIL: Please run scratch tasks for each fedora version (i.e. also do F-9 F-10) * SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. FAIL: Not checked by reviewer (me), will check on next SRPM. * SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. OK * SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK * SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. N/A * SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the ile itself. N/A -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:45:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:45:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491490] Review Request: ghmm - A library with data structures and algorithms for Hidden Markov Models In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311445.n4VEjBTw018416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491490 --- Comment #2 from D Haley 2009-05-31 10:45:10 EDT --- Also, can you set the depends upon and blocks fields for this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311452.n4VEqL98019923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #14 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 10:52:20 EDT --- PATCH: Following the guidance for including examples i removed the makefiles for examples, however when I went to compile it was hitting an error as it was looking for the files. I looked for flags to turn examples off during configure and make however couldnt make much from that so removed the lines from configure and makefile.in that were looking for files in /example and made a patch i figured as the guide did this and with examples compiled rpmlint gave 64 errors that they needed to come out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 14:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 10:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311449.n4VEnvct019186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #44 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-31 10:49:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > Can someone send me a picture of blender to see where the yafaray render option > take place... I've never seen this from the whole review... (at least on > x86_64). > I am also using x86_64. Here is the picture: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/temp/blender-yafaray.png This is an archive with some scenes prepared to be rendered with blender/yafaray: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/temp/example_scenes.tar.bz2 The first one, bed_0001.blend, took more than 2 hours in a quadcore 2.4. Therefore, I would try the other ones first. > > yafaray should be at version 1.0. That a rather common sense that a stable > release have matching svn revision, that's very incorrect to have it mentioned > talking from a stable release. That is how upstream is doing. They moved from 1.0 - 305 to 1.0 - 315: http://www.yafaray.org/download/yafaray > > quoting theses directories: > %{_datadir}/blender/scripts/* > %{_libdir}/libyafarayqt.so > %{_libdir}/libyafarayplugin.so > %{python_sitearch}/_yaf*.so > > IMO, you should only uses one directory from the script and the _yaf*.so. > > Again, that was meant to be asked with upstream blender/yafaray. I have posted a message in yafaray Building forum and did not receive a single reply. They are Debian oriented, and I do not think they are concerned where we are going to install our files. > > The current package provided above doesn't work at all. What do you mean by that? It is working for me just fine. Have you tried it? Does it segfault? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 15:00:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:00:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311500.n4VF0mfo016355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #29 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-31 11:00:47 EDT --- Just a quick update. The desktop entry has been added to the source. I built revision 889, which is very close to the final release. SPEC: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/kradio4.spec SRPMS: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/fedora/kradio4-4.0.0-0.12.r889.20090531.fc10.src.rpm This is the full version, which also creates a kradio4-internetradio: SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/kradio4.spec SRPMS: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/kradio4-4.0.0-0.12.r889.20090531.fc10.src.rpm Both have the same version, and therefore, any 3th party repo can build the full version and post just kradio4-internetradio rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 15:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311509.n4VF92PE023884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #45 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-05-31 11:09:01 EDT --- Another thing. Old models prepared for yafray 0.9 will not be rendered correctly. They must be adapted. That is why I sent you some new models for you to run. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 15:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:13:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311513.n4VFDLGe019968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fkooman at tuxed.net --- Comment #3 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-05-31 11:13:20 EDT --- arista-0.9.1-2.fc11.noarch [fkooman at localhost ~]$ arista-gtk Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/arista-gtk", line 1244, in arista.utils.get_path("locale")) File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/arista/utils.py", line 75, in get_path "path": path, IOError: Can't find locale in any known prefix! [fkooman at localhost ~]$ Maybe a dependency missing? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 15:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 11:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311529.n4VFTuoi029723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Janssen 2009-05-31 11:29:55 EDT --- Ok. It's all yours. Thanks for your contribution :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 16:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 12:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311613.n4VGDE2i008345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #17 from Dan Fuhry 2009-05-31 12:13:11 EDT --- Please excuse my confrontational disposition. I'd like to know how MediaWiki made it into Fedora repositories, seeing as much of the code it uses is also borrowed without being separately packaged. An example of this would be phpWiki's diff engine - both Enano and MediaWiki use this same code from phpWiki 1.3.3. By the standard you are holding us to, MediaWiki would have had to split its diff engine out before it was accepted into Fedora repositories. They don't even HAVE a centralized list of 3rd-party code distributed with their package. Like other web apps, Enano is not very much like a desktop application in the way it is designed. It is a web application. We can't just distribute it with a configure script that screams at you about dependent libraries until everything is satisfied. On the Web, libraries are so small and APIs change so quickly that bundling libraries is the only thing that makes sense. MediaWiki does it like this, so why can't Enano? We take security problems as seriously as anyone. Our turnaround time for security releases is typically 4 hours from the time I'm alerted to it to the time the tarballs are on the Web server and announcements are circulating. Neal Gompa (King InuYasha), who built and plans to maintain the RPM, is the second-highest person in the Enano project. If there's going to be a security release, he knows about it as soon as I become aware of the vulnerability, and sometimes sooner as he's our official QA contact. Now on to API stabilization. Web developers love to break APIs. (Yes, I'm guilty of this too.) By controlling the code ourselves, we ensure that there are not any API changes that could cause Enano to break or somehow introduce a security problem. When done properly - with proper porting and removal of unneeded components, such as is done in Enano and MediaWiki - bundling can mean that security is in fact INCREASED because only the core components involving the heavy number crunching really stay; everything else is done by Enano. Almost all GPL'ed PHP scripts are distributed as applications, not individual libraries and toolkits. This is in contrast to Java applications, which you are equating with PHP applications, but really are different in the sense that Java components are separated into libraries rather than bundled and integrated tightly with the core. This is an industry trend and not something the Enano project really has control over. We have to go with the flow in this case. Integration is crucial too: we also have our own API that bundled libraries need to use, such as the code required to parse wikilinks and route CAPTCHA images through Enano's URL and page management code. Proper integration doesn't happen without this. Another fun statistic: while Enano has a bunch of bundled libraries, none of them ever make SQL queries or directly parse any sort of user input. So the two biggest sources of security vulnerabilities - SQL injection and XSS - should NEVER be present in any 3rd party code. The 80:20 rule applies to security problems too: roughly 80% of security holes are caused by 20% of vulnerability types. In summary: we bundle for two reasons: 1) We don't want API breakage, and 2) Web apps are different from traditional ones; libraries often do too much and need things to be stripped out in order to work correctly. We allow this because the overhead, not the core functionality, is almost always where security problems are. If you're going to have someone review this package, it should be an experienced web developer who understands this stuff. Web apps just are not traditional desktop apps, and many web application security practices are difficult to grasp from the perspective of someone who handles security of desktop apps. They're not less secure, they're just different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 16:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 12:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311620.n4VGKbSH004624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-31 12:20:37 EDT --- When building on (a kqemu virtual machine set-up with an installation from scratch of) CentOS 5.3, the RPM packages are well built. However, rpmlint still complains on CentOS 5.3 (that "libraries are delivered in a "noarch" package), due the "BuildArch: noarch" directive of the "doc" sub-package, though that directive is enclosed within proper "%if 0%{fedora} >= 10 [...] %endif" clause, as per the following: ------------------------- %package doc Summary: HTML documentation for the %{name} library Group: Documentation %if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: texlive-latex %endif ------------------------- I have checked that 'rpm --eval "%{fedora}"' gives "%{fedora}" under CentOS 5.3 (i.e, the %{fedora} macro is not defined on that distribution), whereas it gives "11" under Fedora Rawhide and "10" under Fedora 10 (as expected). However, I'm not sure that the following assertion "0%{fedora} >= 10" holds false under CentOS 5.3. Also, still on CentOS 5.3, the three %{rhel}, %{rhl} and %{el5} macros are undefined, though they should be defined, according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag . Or, did I miss something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 16:56:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 12:56:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311656.n4VGuSBD012675@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt 2009-05-31 12:56:27 EDT --- * The macros are Fedora EPEL specific. You need add-on packages: http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/buildgroups/ * Have you verified that CentOS builds all packages as noarch? Or is it just rpmlint that returns a false positive? AFAIK, it only runs some regexp over the spec file. > 'rpm --eval "%{fedora}"' gives "%{fedora}" In the spec it's %{?fedora} however (cf. "rpm --eval %{?fedora}"), which expands to %nil if the macro is undefined. Hence 0%{?fedora} >= 10 is false on CentOS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 18:07:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 14:07:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311807.n4VI7Gc0002441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 478930 depends on bug 467237, which changed state. Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-05-31 14:07:14 EDT --- There are some issues with this one: - koji rawhide build seems fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385823 ! The file CHANGELOG can go to a %doc * The source extraction guide is incomplete. The original source tree contains a ./java directory, which is missing from your tarball. Is there a reason? ? There is some html documentation under the ./Doc directory. Currently there is a doxygen documentation in the doc package which seemed to me rather useless. Shall we replace it with the html documentation from the ./Doc directory? - rpmlint globus-rls-client-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored. (Well, the CHANGELOG might fit in here) * Please fix the compilation warnings of the type rpc.c:395: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'globus_size_t' -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 18:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 14:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481536] Review Request: enano - Enano CMS, a php-based modular content management system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311810.n4VIAmnm030075@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481536 --- Comment #18 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-05-31 14:10:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Please excuse my confrontational disposition. > The problem with confrontational dispositions are that they leave the impression that the party being confrontational is unwilling to learn and adapt. At that point, it's often not worthwhile to continue a conversation because no progress will be made. > I'd like to know how MediaWiki made it into Fedora repositories, seeing as much > of the code it uses is also borrowed without being separately packaged. An > example of this would be phpWiki's diff engine - both Enano and MediaWiki use > this same code from phpWiki 1.3.3. By the standard you are holding us to, > MediaWiki would have had to split its diff engine out before it was accepted > into Fedora repositories. They don't even HAVE a centralized list of 3rd-party > code distributed with their package. > Sorry if my quick grep for license incompatibilities confused you. Your example falls outside the scope of the no bundled library requirement because the file is not a library. Even though no duplication of code would lead to more security in an ideal world, there are a number of issues that prevent us from doing this reasonably. The requirement that libraries not be bundled is a good compromise since libraries are packaged separately, released on their own timelines, and exist to be used in this way. Since the code you point out has been copy and pasted between three applications, I'd say that it's a great candidate for spinning off into its own library so all three projects can share the maintainance burden and addition of new features. If you can point out a place where Mediawiki is bundling a library I'll be happy to open a bug report and pursue the mediawiki packager to get that fixed. Incompatible licensing or even problems with people including unlicensed code is a separate issue from bundled libraries as they can exist independent of each other. However, projects that bundle libraries often have license issues as well as they stem from the same root cause: upstream not understanding all the implications of including code that they do not originate. > Like other web apps, Enano is not very much like a desktop application in the > way it is designed. It is a web application. We can't just distribute it with a > configure script that screams at you about dependent libraries until everything > is satisfied. On the Web, libraries are so small and APIs change so quickly > that bundling libraries is the only thing that makes sense. This is certainly a developer way of looking at things. However, the claim that web applications are special is false. There are web applications that distribute with scripts that check that necessary functionality is available. There are desktop applications that have to deal with small libraries and quickly changing APIs. We've made the decision in Fedora that convenience in this area does not trump security. Instead we evolve solutions to the problems you face. Sometimes we port code to newer versions of libraries for you and send the patches back to you. In other instances we create parallel installable versions of the libraries your application depends on. Compromises that address both API instability and security exist. > MediaWiki does it > like this, so why can't Enano? > If mediawiki bundles libraries, I'll file a bug and either the maintainer will fix it or I'll talk with the PHP SIG about the best way to fix the issues. > We take security problems as seriously as anyone. Our turnaround time for > security releases is typically 4 hours from the time I'm alerted to it to the > time the tarballs are on the Web server and announcements are circulating. Neal > Gompa (King InuYasha), who built and plans to maintain the RPM, is the > second-highest person in the Enano project. If there's going to be a security > release, he knows about it as soon as I become aware of the vulnerability, and > sometimes sooner as he's our official QA contact. > This shows that you are good at reacting to security issues which is certainly good. It doesn't show that you are good at proactively designing secure systems. It doesn't show that you are paying attention to the security issues that are popping up in the third-party code you are bundling. It doesn't show that you are evaluating the third party code you incorporate for security issues. > Now on to API stabilization. Web developers love to break APIs. (Yes, I'm > guilty of this too.) By controlling the code ourselves, we ensure that there > are not any API changes that could cause Enano to break or somehow introduce a > security problem. When done properly - with proper porting and removal of > unneeded components, such as is done in Enano and MediaWiki - bundling can mean > that security is in fact INCREASED because only the core components involving > the heavy number crunching really stay; everything else is done by Enano. This is only partially true but has offsetting costs as well. The partially true part is that if you are using function A but not B from a library, it doesn't matter if you strip function B from the library or use the system version, a security flaw in function A will affect you in either case and a security flaw in function B will not affect you. If you are removing functionality from function A to do your work, then yes, you can increase security. But the cost is that you have to make invasive local changes to the code which takes time, could possibly introduce other security flaws into the code, and which makes backporting new fixes from the upstream for that code harder. > Almost all GPL'ed PHP scripts are distributed as applications, not individual > libraries and toolkits. This is in contrast to Java applications, which you are > equating with PHP applications, but really are different in the sense that Java > components are separated into libraries rather than bundled and integrated > tightly with the core. This is an industry trend and not something the Enano > project really has control over. We have to go with the flow in this case. > Recently there's been a lot more dependencies on http://pear.php.net/ modules cropping up in php applications so I'd dispute your idea that this is a trend. Perhaps, "the way applications have been coded in the past" would be more accurate. Contributing the common code you rely on to PEAR and maintaining them there is a way that Enano can go against hte flow and help the greater PHP community as well. Regardless, the blocker is on things that are separately bundled libraries, not things that you've copy-and-pasted out of random other applications (despite the problems that can crop up here as well). > Integration is crucial too: we also have our own API that bundled libraries > need to use, such as the code required to parse wikilinks and route CAPTCHA > images through Enano's URL and page management code. Proper integration doesn't > happen without this. > > Another fun statistic: while Enano has a bunch of bundled libraries, none of > them ever make SQL queries or directly parse any sort of user input. So the two > biggest sources of security vulnerabilities - SQL injection and XSS - should > NEVER be present in any 3rd party code. The 80:20 rule applies to security > problems too: roughly 80% of security holes are caused by 20% of vulnerability > types. > > In summary: we bundle for two reasons: > 1) We don't want API breakage, and > 2) Web apps are different from traditional ones; libraries often do too much > and need things to be stripped out in order to work correctly. We allow this > because the overhead, not the core functionality, is almost always where > security problems are. > > If you're going to have someone review this package, it should be an > experienced web developer who understands this stuff. Web apps just are not > traditional desktop apps, and many web application security practices are > difficult to grasp from the perspective of someone who handles security of > desktop apps. They're not less secure, they're just different. If you want an experienced web application developer to review this package, I can take over the review. But seeing as I've been explaining the problem with bundling libraries, that particular blocker would remain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 19:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311903.n4VJ3N3R007526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #15 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 15:03:22 EDT --- ------------------------------- * Sun May 31 2009 Gareth John gareth.l.john at googlemail.com 0.4.0-4 - Removed install from package docs - added preserve timestamp flag to make install -------------------------------- Rpmlint says: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-4.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-4.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-4.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- Files: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 19:17:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311917.n4VJHeeE015488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-31 15:17:39 EDT --- IMHO there's no need to patch anything. Drop the patch and after the install just remove the examples/.libs directory and the makefiles. In fact you could as well ship the example binaries, that way one wouldn't need to compile them to see what they do. They can't be placed in %{_bindir} though, since they have such generic names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 19:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 15:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905311946.n4VJkdsY014248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #17 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 15:46:38 EDT --- $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-5.fc10.i386.rpm gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/logging.o gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/tiles-simple.o gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/multi-completion.o gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.deps gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.deps gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/tiles-simple gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/multi-completion gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/logging Should i remove all of the following file as well?(In reply to comment #16) > IMHO there's no need to patch anything. Drop the patch and after the install > just remove the examples/.libs directory and the makefiles. > > In fact you could as well ship the example binaries, that way one wouldn't need > to compile them to see what they do. They can't be placed in %{_bindir} though, > since they have such generic names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:11:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312011.n4VKBR4M023912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:11:26 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:10:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:10:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312010.n4VKA6Wm023684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #4 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-31 16:10:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) I had added the EPEL RPM repository, and those macros were defined. But, as you suggested, I made a typo when trying to evaluate them with 'rpm --eval' :) However, I had it right in the specification file (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/wsdlpull/123/wsdlpull.spec) and: * All the packages, including the "doc" one, are generated under the specific architecture (RPMS/x86_64 in my case) directory (as expected). * Again as you suggested, it appears that it is just rpmlint returning a false positive. It is certainly due to the rpmlint "W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package" bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488930). That bug has been corrected in version from 0.87-1, whereas the latest version available on CentOS 5.3 (Fedora EPEL 5) is 0.85-3 (newer versions are not even available in the epel-testing repository). So, that package builds nicely on all the platforms (Fedora 10, 11, rawhide and EPEL 5). For instance, for F11/F12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1385925 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312014.n4VKEI36018644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:14:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312013.n4VKDGdM018567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:13:15 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312012.n4VKCFDJ018455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:12:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502323] Review Request: perl-Class-DBI-Plugin-DeepAbstractSearch - SQL::Abstract for Class::DBI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312012.n4VKC9DS018415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502323 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-05-31 16:12:09 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:15:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:15:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312015.n4VKFtYH019220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:15:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:15:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:15:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312015.n4VKF7UN019123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:15:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175433] Review Request: tor - Anonymizing overlay network for TCP (The onion router) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312017.n4VKHrWC024931@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175433 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #63 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-05-31 16:17:51 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312031.n4VKVRog021628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #18 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 16:31:26 EDT --- %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.deps/ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.libs/ chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ------------------------------------------ I have tried this and nearly every combination of directory even hard coding the relevant directory in and nothing gets removed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 20:33:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 16:33:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312033.n4VKXveZ027476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #19 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 16:33:57 EDT --- %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.deps/ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.libs/ chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ------------------------------------------ I have tried this and nearly every combination of directory even hard coding the relevant directory in and nothing gets removed? The .libs and .deps will not shift is there any reason you could suggest as to why it isnt working rpmlint hints (-i flag) dont give much guidance here and internet is being friendly either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 21:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312112.n4VLCpL1001540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-05-31 17:12:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Should i remove all of the following file as well? Yes, the .o files are object files resulting from compilation of the source code units. (In reply to comment #19) > %install > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.deps/ > rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/.libs/ > chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > > ------------------------------------------ > I have tried this and nearly every combination of directory even hard coding > the relevant directory in and nothing gets removed? The .libs and .deps will > not shift is there any reason you could suggest as to why it isnt working > rpmlint hints (-i flag) dont give much guidance here and internet is being > friendly either. You just need to rm -rf examples/.libs examples/.deps as the %doc listing pulls them in after the install phase. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 21:45:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 17:45:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312145.n4VLjiVV000500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #13 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-31 17:45:43 EDT --- > The main problem I see is that you rewrote the spec and based your review on > the rewrite. This renders the review pretty useless because nobody will realize > his own errors. No, the main problem is that you have 'licked blood' now and go out of your way to find issues where there are none. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 22:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 18:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312202.n4VM2kII009076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-05-31 18:02:45 EDT --- You call a wrong license tag and missing parallel build no problems? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 22:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 18:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312241.n4VMfimR015242@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #15 from Matthias Clasen 2009-05-31 18:41:43 EDT --- The license tag was a minor oversight indeed. Thanks for finding that. I don't see any problem with parallel build. Have you verified that there are no race conditions in the package if you turn it on ? See, me neither... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun May 31 22:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 18:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200905312244.n4VMihsv009329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #21 from Gareth John 2009-05-31 18:44:42 EDT --- ------------------------------- * Sun May 31 2009 Gareth John gareth.l.john at googlemail.com 0.4.0-5 - Removed patch - Added line remove example/.libs and example/.deps - Dropped remove /example/makefiles -------------------------------- Rpmlint says: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-5.fc10.i386.rpm gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/tiles-simple gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/multi-completion gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0/examples/logging 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-5.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-5.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- Files: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-5.fc10.src.rpm --------------------------------- The spurious-executable-perm warnings are due to the compiled files in the examples directory, as they are in the correct dir for their purpose and not in %{_bindir} i assume that this is an acceptable warning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.