[Bug 497622] Review Request: apbs - adaptive poisson boltzmann solver

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497622





--- Comment #6 from Tim Fenn <fenn at stanford.edu>  2009-05-05 00:08:46 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
> > > - Stuff under contrib/ seems to be licensed under LGPLv2+, but nothing seems to
> > > be packaged from there.
> > > 
> > 
> > the libraries that are built in contrib/ are lumped into libapbs.so* (along
> > with some of the BSD licensed functions) - I've made note of the dual license,
> > is it sufficient/OK to annotate the .so files as "BSD and LGPLv2+" in the
> > %files section and add a PACKAGE-LICENSING file?
> 
> Damn. Then the current packaging is a no-go: you must strip apbs of the contrib
> packages and package them separately.
> 
> At least maloc and pmg have upstreams here: http://fetk.org/
> 

Argh - OK, I'll talk with upstream, who I believe may be able to correct this.

> Btw, you're maintaining PyMOL, right?

Yes.

> Does it include an own copy of apbs?

No - thus the reason for this package.  :(

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.