[Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu May 7 13:57:55 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855
Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?
--- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp <cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org> 2009-05-07 09:57:54 EDT ---
=========
REVOKED
=========
the SRPM, i never take a look in the single SPEC-file
mh, I'm in the shit. I didn't see the missing Icon-Cache and the incorrect
ownage.
The desktop file and the icon stuff is not needed and there are dependencies in
the X. I have a CUI package with a desktop file, too.. So this wasn't a problem
for me.
Another thing is that the main dependency ccrypt is not available for ppc64.
---
MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
FAIL!
---
Group: yeah, you are right again.
I'm awfully sorry for making such a trouble...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list