[Bug 487098] Review Request: Djblets - A collection of useful classes and functions for Django

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487098





--- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat.com>  2009-05-13 17:20:11 EDT ---
Thanks.

I got a response from fedora-legal on the partial license grant on this
question:
---
The project's website does state that the overall code license is MIT
[1], my concern was that only a subset of the files within the tarball
carry an explicit MIT grant in their headers, the others are devoid of
copyright/license text.

Based on that, it sounds like this is OK for inclusion, and that I was
being overly paranoid.  Is this correct?

Dave
[1] http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/Djblets states "Djblets is
under the MIT license."
---

----
Response at:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-May/msg00025.html
> Based on that, it sounds like this is OK for inclusion, and that I was
> being overly paranoid.  Is this correct?

Yes, although, you should still ask upstream to fix the license
attribution on the files which do not contain it.
----

I think this package is ready to approve, with these caveats:
 - Please add a comment above the License tag indicating the upstream license
text, and the link to fedora-legal-list above.
 - Please change License to "MIT and (MIT or GPL)", with a further comment
about the bundled version of jquery.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.