[Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713





--- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson <rmeggins at redhat.com>  2009-05-18 15:24:30 EDT ---
Updated:
Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base.spec
SRPM URL:
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.src.rpm
Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
Other source files mentioned in spec are at
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview

sha1sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 
f2bd1d448cddb6bddfb5c62f97e898a97d253c5e  389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2
md5sum 389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2 
5c14449d2960ddba89efc48269ba6f3b  389-ds-base-1.2.1.tar.bz2

Builds in mock cleanly

> rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

> rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/389-ds-base-1.2.1-1.fc10.i386.rpm 
389-ds-base.i386: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/dirsrv
389-ds-base.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.2.1-1 1.2.1-1.fc10
389-ds-base.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.

For the first warning - the directory server does its own log rotation, so no
need for logrotate.

For the second warning - I have no idea - there is no .fc10 in the Changelog
section

For the third warning - yes, this is intentional that the file is named
"dirsrv" and not the Fedora package name.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.