[Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed May 20 21:26:08 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583


Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola at iki.fi>  2009-05-20 17:26:06 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I hope everything is fixed now, I didn't notice upstream's license change.
> When adding Requires: libpurple, rpmlint says E: explicit-lib-dependency
> libpurple
> so I dropped that tag again... RPM is recognizing it by itself. Besides,
> Requires: pidgin automatically pulls in libpurple.

Oh, sometimes you don't have to care about rpmlint's warnings since it does
produce some false positives; this is one very common type of them. Due to the
dir ownership issue it IS wanted that libpurple is explicitly required; the
rpmlint warning can be ignored.

I don't have an xfire account, so I can't test this. From a packaging point of
view the package looks good, though.

APPROVED


PS. A final nitpick: I'd use
 %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/%{srcname}.png
instead of
 %{_datadir}/pixmaps/pidgin/protocols/*/%{srcname}*
since thus one sees straight away what kind of stuff in is in those
directories.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list