[Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun May 31 16:20:37 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686





--- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud <denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org>  2009-05-31 12:20:37 EDT ---
When building on (a kqemu virtual machine set-up with an installation from
scratch of) CentOS 5.3, the RPM packages are well built.

However, rpmlint still complains on CentOS 5.3 (that "libraries are delivered
in a "noarch" package), due the "BuildArch: noarch" directive of the "doc"
sub-package, though that directive is enclosed within proper "%if 0%{fedora} >=
10 [...] %endif" clause, as per the following:
-------------------------
%package doc
Summary: HTML documentation for the %{name} library
Group: Documentation
%if 0%{?fedora} >= 10
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: texlive-latex
%endif
-------------------------

I have checked that 'rpm --eval "%{fedora}"' gives "%{fedora}" under CentOS 5.3
(i.e, the %{fedora} macro is not defined on that distribution), whereas it
gives "11" under Fedora Rawhide and "10" under Fedora 10 (as expected).
However, I'm not sure that the following assertion "0%{fedora} >= 10" holds
false under CentOS 5.3.

Also, still on CentOS 5.3, the three %{rhel}, %{rhl} and %{el5} macros are
undefined, though they should be defined, according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag . Or, did I miss something?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list